Chemoembolization Versus Radioembolization in Treating Patients With Liver Cancer That Cannot Be Treated With Radiofrequency Ablation Or Surgery
Primary Purpose
Liver Cancer
Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
yttrium Y 90 glass microspheres
Doxorubicin
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Liver Cancer focused on measuring advanced adult primary liver cancer, localized unresectable adult primary liver cancer, recurrent adult primary liver cancer, adult primary hepatocellular carcinoma
Eligibility Criteria
DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:
- Hepatocellular Carcinoma confined to the liver that is unresectable with surgery or unable to be treated with radiofrequency ablation diagnosed by biopsy or imaging criteria (CT/MRI)
- No segmental, lobar, or main portal vein thrombosis as evidenced by CT or MRI imaging
Inclusion Criteria
- Adults > 18 years old of either gender
- Diagnosis of liver confined HCC confirmed by histology or American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) guidelines [59,60] [appendix A].
- Lesions < 1 cm in diameter have a low likelihood of being malignant and should be followed. Lack of growth over 1-2 years suggests it is not HCC.
- AFP >200 and radiological evidence (arterial hypervascularity) of lesion > 2 cm does not require biopsy.
- Two imaging modalities (triphasic CT, MRI, ultrasound, angiography) demonstrating "arterial hypervascularity" in the background of cirrhosis does not require biopsy
- One imaging modality with a lesion with arterial hypervascularity with wash out in early or delayed venous phase, does not require a biopsy
- Atypical appearances on imaging requires a biopsy.
- Non-conclusive biopsy requires closer monitoring
- For non-cirrhotics (by biopsy or imaging findings), diagnosis of HCC requires biopsy
- Patients with <50% liver involvement
- Measurable liver confined disease with bi-dimensional measurements, required within 4 weeks of screening. Lesions reported on imaging as "too small to characterize", abdominal lymph nodes < 2.0 cm or ascites in the setting of cirrhosis are not considered metastatic disease unless cytology proven.
- No segmental, lobar or main portal vein thrombosis as evidence by cross sectional imaging
- Prior resection permitted, no prior systemic, ablative or infusion therapy permitted
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0, 1, or 2 [appendix B]
- Childs score of A or B [appendix C]
- Required lab parameters within 28 days of screening
- Serum bilirubin ≤ 2.0 mg/dl (unless segmental infusion can be performed
- AST and ALT ≤ 5 times upper limit of normal (ULN)
- Creatinine ≤ 1.5 times ULN
- Prothrombin time (PT)/ International normalized ratio (INR) ≤ 2.3 or PT ≤ 6 seconds above control. If subjects are being anticoagulated they can participate if proof of no coagulation abnormality existed prior to use of anticoagulants
- Negative serum or urine pregnancy test for females of child bearing potential
- Ability to understand and sign the informed consent; patient must have signed informed consent prior to registration on study
- Women of childbearing potential and sexually active males must use contraception while on study
- Lesions must be treatable angiographically by either radioembolization or chemoembolization.
Exclusion criteria
- Cardiac disease: Congestive heart failure > class II New York Heart Association (NYHA). Patients must not have unstable angina (angina symptoms at rest) or new onset angina (began within the last 3 months) or myocardial infarction within the past 6 months.
- Patients with infiltrative HCC are not eligible.
- Patients with bulk disease (≥70% tumor replacement of liver) are not eligible.
- Patients with ≥50% tumor replacement of liver, with an albumin < 3.0 g/dl are not eligible.
- Major surgery within 4 weeks prior to the screening visit
- Active clinically serious infection > Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v 4.0) Grade 2
- Any condition (psychological, physical or use/abuse of substances) which, in the opinion of the principal investigator (PI) or a sub-investigator (sub-I), would possibly endanger the subject during their participation in the study, or allow for non-compliance with the investigational drug and treatment under study.
- Due to the experimental nature of the therapy and the unknown risk to a fetus, pregnant and/or lactating women are not eligible to participate in this study.
- In the opinion of the investigator, patient is not a candidate/lesion not amenable for RFA (e.g. lesion location, shape, abnormal coagulation parameters, multi-focality).
Sites / Locations
- Northwestern University, Northwestern Memorial Hospital
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Experimental
Arm Label
Arm I (radioembolization)
Arm II (transarterial chemoembolization [TACE])
Arm Description
Patients undergo radioembolization with yttrium Y 90 glass microspheres by hepatic artery infusion for approximately 1-3 courses.
Patients undergo TACE with mitomycin C, doxorubicin hydrochloride, and cisplatin by hepatic artery infusion for approximately 1-3 courses.
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Time to Progression (TTP) in Patients Treated With TACE and Y90
Compare and contrast TACE and Y90 in order to determine either equivalence or superiority as measured by time-to-progression. Patients have repeat imaging done (MRI or CT) at 1-month post procedure and then every 3 months after that. TTP and overall survival (OS) analyses were calculated from day of randomization by Kaplan-Meier analysis on intention-to-treat (ITT) basis.
Progression (which is detected on follow-up imaging scans) was defined as:
Progression by World Health Organization (WHO) response criteria 25% increase in bidimensional cross product.
Progression by European Assosciation for the Study of the Liver (EASL): 25% increase in arterial enhancement
Malignant portal vein tumor thrombus development
Index lesion: lesions requiring re-treatment because of worsening circumferential enhancement
Development of new lesions or extra-hepatic metastases.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Number of Patients Who Achieved Complete or Partial Radiologic Response After Treatment
Repeat imaging (CT/MRI) and lab work including tumor markers will be assessed 1 month post-treatment then every 3 months after that. Both EASL & WHO criteria are used.
By EASL criteria Complete response is 100% Decrease in amount of enhancing tissue in index lesion, Partial response is ≥50% deecrease in amount of enhancing tissue in index lesion, Stable disease is <50% Decrease in to ≤ 25% increase in amount of enhancing tissue in index lesion, Progressive disease <25% Increase in amount of enhancing tissue in index lesion and/or new enhancement in previously treated index lesion.
Overall Survival
Comparing overall survival of both treatment arms.
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT00956930
First Posted
August 8, 2009
Last Updated
November 17, 2022
Sponsor
Northwestern University
Collaborators
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00956930
Brief Title
Chemoembolization Versus Radioembolization in Treating Patients With Liver Cancer That Cannot Be Treated With Radiofrequency Ablation Or Surgery
Official Title
An Investigator Initiated Multicenter Prospective Randomized Study of Chemoembolization Versus Radioembolization for the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma (PREMIERE Trial)
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
November 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
August 2009 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
June 2, 2016 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
July 15, 2016 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Northwestern University
Collaborators
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
RATIONALE: Chemoembolization kills tumor cells by blocking the blood flow to the tumor and keeping chemotherapy drugs near the tumor. Radioembolization kills tumor cells by blocking the blood flow to the tumor and keeping radioactive substances near the tumor. It is not yet known which treatment regimen is more effective in treating patients with liver cancer.
PURPOSE: This randomized phase II trial is studying radioembolization to see how well it works compared with chemoembolization in treating patients with liver cancer that cannot be treated with Radiofrequency Ablation or removed by surgery.
Detailed Description
OBJECTIVES:
Primary
Compare and contrast TACE and Y90 in order to determine either equivalence or superiority as measured by time-to-progression.
Secondary
Characterize the safety and toxicity profile of these regimens.
Determine the need for subsequent treatment in these patients.
Determine tumor response in these patients
Characterize change in quality of life and functional status in these patients.
Determine time to progression in these patients.
OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to receive either TACE or Y90
Arm I (radioembolization): Patients undergo radioembolization with yttrium Y 90 glass microspheres by hepatic artery infusion for approximately 1-3 courses.
Arm II (transarterial chemoembolization [TACE]): Patients undergo TACE with mitomycin C, doxorubicin hydrochloride, and cisplatin by hepatic artery infusion for approximately 1-3 courses.
In both arms, treatment modifications may apply according to response.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed every 3 months.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Liver Cancer
Keywords
advanced adult primary liver cancer, localized unresectable adult primary liver cancer, recurrent adult primary liver cancer, adult primary hepatocellular carcinoma
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
45 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Arm I (radioembolization)
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Patients undergo radioembolization with yttrium Y 90 glass microspheres by hepatic artery infusion for approximately 1-3 courses.
Arm Title
Arm II (transarterial chemoembolization [TACE])
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Patients undergo TACE with mitomycin C, doxorubicin hydrochloride, and cisplatin by hepatic artery infusion for approximately 1-3 courses.
Intervention Type
Radiation
Intervention Name(s)
yttrium Y 90 glass microspheres
Other Intervention Name(s)
Radioembolization
Intervention Description
Patients undergo radioembolization.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Doxorubicin
Other Intervention Name(s)
Doxorubicin hydrocholoride, Adriamycin, Chemoembolization (TACE)
Intervention Description
75mg fixed dose
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Time to Progression (TTP) in Patients Treated With TACE and Y90
Description
Compare and contrast TACE and Y90 in order to determine either equivalence or superiority as measured by time-to-progression. Patients have repeat imaging done (MRI or CT) at 1-month post procedure and then every 3 months after that. TTP and overall survival (OS) analyses were calculated from day of randomization by Kaplan-Meier analysis on intention-to-treat (ITT) basis.
Progression (which is detected on follow-up imaging scans) was defined as:
Progression by World Health Organization (WHO) response criteria 25% increase in bidimensional cross product.
Progression by European Assosciation for the Study of the Liver (EASL): 25% increase in arterial enhancement
Malignant portal vein tumor thrombus development
Index lesion: lesions requiring re-treatment because of worsening circumferential enhancement
Development of new lesions or extra-hepatic metastases.
Time Frame
Up to 6 yrs
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Number of Patients Who Achieved Complete or Partial Radiologic Response After Treatment
Description
Repeat imaging (CT/MRI) and lab work including tumor markers will be assessed 1 month post-treatment then every 3 months after that. Both EASL & WHO criteria are used.
By EASL criteria Complete response is 100% Decrease in amount of enhancing tissue in index lesion, Partial response is ≥50% deecrease in amount of enhancing tissue in index lesion, Stable disease is <50% Decrease in to ≤ 25% increase in amount of enhancing tissue in index lesion, Progressive disease <25% Increase in amount of enhancing tissue in index lesion and/or new enhancement in previously treated index lesion.
Time Frame
up to 6 years
Title
Overall Survival
Description
Comparing overall survival of both treatment arms.
Time Frame
From day of randomization until date of death, or liver transplant or 7/15/2016, whichever came first, assessed up to 6 years
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
120 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:
Hepatocellular Carcinoma confined to the liver that is unresectable with surgery or unable to be treated with radiofrequency ablation diagnosed by biopsy or imaging criteria (CT/MRI)
No segmental, lobar, or main portal vein thrombosis as evidenced by CT or MRI imaging
Inclusion Criteria
Adults > 18 years old of either gender
Diagnosis of liver confined HCC confirmed by histology or American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) guidelines [59,60] [appendix A].
Lesions < 1 cm in diameter have a low likelihood of being malignant and should be followed. Lack of growth over 1-2 years suggests it is not HCC.
AFP >200 and radiological evidence (arterial hypervascularity) of lesion > 2 cm does not require biopsy.
Two imaging modalities (triphasic CT, MRI, ultrasound, angiography) demonstrating "arterial hypervascularity" in the background of cirrhosis does not require biopsy
One imaging modality with a lesion with arterial hypervascularity with wash out in early or delayed venous phase, does not require a biopsy
Atypical appearances on imaging requires a biopsy.
Non-conclusive biopsy requires closer monitoring
For non-cirrhotics (by biopsy or imaging findings), diagnosis of HCC requires biopsy
Patients with <50% liver involvement
Measurable liver confined disease with bi-dimensional measurements, required within 4 weeks of screening. Lesions reported on imaging as "too small to characterize", abdominal lymph nodes < 2.0 cm or ascites in the setting of cirrhosis are not considered metastatic disease unless cytology proven.
No segmental, lobar or main portal vein thrombosis as evidence by cross sectional imaging
Prior resection permitted, no prior systemic, ablative or infusion therapy permitted
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0, 1, or 2 [appendix B]
Childs score of A or B [appendix C]
Required lab parameters within 28 days of screening
Serum bilirubin ≤ 2.0 mg/dl (unless segmental infusion can be performed
AST and ALT ≤ 5 times upper limit of normal (ULN)
Creatinine ≤ 1.5 times ULN
Prothrombin time (PT)/ International normalized ratio (INR) ≤ 2.3 or PT ≤ 6 seconds above control. If subjects are being anticoagulated they can participate if proof of no coagulation abnormality existed prior to use of anticoagulants
Negative serum or urine pregnancy test for females of child bearing potential
Ability to understand and sign the informed consent; patient must have signed informed consent prior to registration on study
Women of childbearing potential and sexually active males must use contraception while on study
Lesions must be treatable angiographically by either radioembolization or chemoembolization.
Exclusion criteria
Cardiac disease: Congestive heart failure > class II New York Heart Association (NYHA). Patients must not have unstable angina (angina symptoms at rest) or new onset angina (began within the last 3 months) or myocardial infarction within the past 6 months.
Patients with infiltrative HCC are not eligible.
Patients with bulk disease (≥70% tumor replacement of liver) are not eligible.
Patients with ≥50% tumor replacement of liver, with an albumin < 3.0 g/dl are not eligible.
Major surgery within 4 weeks prior to the screening visit
Active clinically serious infection > Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v 4.0) Grade 2
Any condition (psychological, physical or use/abuse of substances) which, in the opinion of the principal investigator (PI) or a sub-investigator (sub-I), would possibly endanger the subject during their participation in the study, or allow for non-compliance with the investigational drug and treatment under study.
Due to the experimental nature of the therapy and the unknown risk to a fetus, pregnant and/or lactating women are not eligible to participate in this study.
In the opinion of the investigator, patient is not a candidate/lesion not amenable for RFA (e.g. lesion location, shape, abnormal coagulation parameters, multi-focality).
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Riad Salem, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Northwestern University
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Northwestern University, Northwestern Memorial Hospital
City
Chicago
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60611-3013
Country
United States
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
No
IPD Sharing Plan Description
Data will be published in medical journals.
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
27575820
Citation
Salem R, Gordon AC, Mouli S, Hickey R, Kallini J, Gabr A, Mulcahy MF, Baker T, Abecassis M, Miller FH, Yaghmai V, Sato K, Desai K, Thornburg B, Benson AB, Rademaker A, Ganger D, Kulik L, Lewandowski RJ. Y90 Radioembolization Significantly Prolongs Time to Progression Compared With Chemoembolization in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Gastroenterology. 2016 Dec;151(6):1155-1163.e2. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.08.029. Epub 2016 Aug 27.
Results Reference
result
Links:
URL
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27575820
Description
Y90 Radioembolization Significantly Prolongs Time to Progression Compared With Chemoembolization in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Learn more about this trial
Chemoembolization Versus Radioembolization in Treating Patients With Liver Cancer That Cannot Be Treated With Radiofrequency Ablation Or Surgery
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs