Alteration of Deep Brain Stimulation Parameters for Dystonia
Primary Purpose
Dystonia
Status
Unknown status
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United Kingdom
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Alteration of deep brain stimulator settings
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Dystonia focused on measuring Dystonia
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Primary dystonia (focal cervical or generalised dystonia) who are receiving chronic (>1 year) bilateral pallidal stimulation but have had poor therapeutic responses (< 50% improvement in relevant dystonia severity rating scale*) despite confirmation of accurate electrode position.
Able to understand study requirements - able to provide consent.
- Relevant dystonia rating scales: Cervical dystonia - severity subsection of the Toronto Western Hospital spasmodic torticollis rating scale; Generalised dystonia - severity section of the Burke Fahn Marsden rating scale.
Exclusion Criteria:
- None.
Sites / Locations
- University of Oxford, Nuffield Department of SurgeryRecruiting
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
No Intervention
Arm Label
60 Hz stimulation
130 Hz stimulation
Arm Description
Experimental reduced frequency pallidal stimulation
Current standard pallidal stimulation setting
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
To assess if the stimulation frequency of 60 Hz is superior to 130 Hz for patients with primary dystonia who have responded poorly to standard 130 Hz pallidal stimulation
Secondary Outcome Measures
Assess any potential changes in anxiety, mood, cognition
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT00971854
First Posted
September 3, 2009
Last Updated
October 12, 2009
Sponsor
University of Oxford
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00971854
Brief Title
Alteration of Deep Brain Stimulation Parameters for Dystonia
Official Title
Alteration of Deep Brain Stimulation Parameters for Dystonia- A Double Blinded Randomised Controlled Trial
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
September 2009
Overall Recruitment Status
Unknown status
Study Start Date
September 2009 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
January 2010 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
February 2010 (Anticipated)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Name of the Sponsor
University of Oxford
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) involves placing electrodes into the brain. Through these electrodes, artificial electrical signals are chronically delivered into deep brain regions in order to alter abnormal brain activity. The artificial electrical signals are generated by a battery that is inserted under the skin of the chest. DBS is used to treat several disorders of movement, including dystonia. In dystonia, the electrodes are inserted into a brain region called the globus pallidus.
Globus pallidus stimulation can be very effective therapy for dystonia. However not all patients are equally responsive and therapeutic outcomes can be frustratingly variable. The reason for this variability is unclear. Such variability in response may need to be met by tailoring stimulation to individual patients.
Another issue with deep brain stimulation is battery life. Eventually, batteries become depleted and need to be replaced. Such battery replacements require an operation, hospital stay and the risk of introducing infection. The high electrical energy that has been used to treat dystonia means that batteries are typically replaced every year or two.
The artificial electrical signals of deep brain stimulation are delivered with three parameters; frequency (Hertz - Hz), voltage (volts) and pulse width (microseconds). It has recently been reported that lower frequency stimulation, at 60Hz rather than 130Hz, can be used effectively to treat dystonia. Such 60Hz stimulation may be more effective for some patients than others. The lower energy demands of 60Hz stimulation would also greatly improve battery life (potentially doubling battery life).
The aim of this study is to assess if 60Hz stimulation is more effective in ameliorating the dystonia of patients who have responded poorly to 130Hz pallidal stimulation. The current status of the evidence is one of clinical equipoise (uncertainty) and therefore suits a double blinded randomised trial.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Dystonia
Keywords
Dystonia
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
20 (Anticipated)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
60 Hz stimulation
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Experimental reduced frequency pallidal stimulation
Arm Title
130 Hz stimulation
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
Current standard pallidal stimulation setting
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Alteration of deep brain stimulator settings
Intervention Description
From 130Hz to 60Hz pallidal stimulation
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
To assess if the stimulation frequency of 60 Hz is superior to 130 Hz for patients with primary dystonia who have responded poorly to standard 130 Hz pallidal stimulation
Time Frame
6 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Assess any potential changes in anxiety, mood, cognition
Time Frame
6 months
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Primary dystonia (focal cervical or generalised dystonia) who are receiving chronic (>1 year) bilateral pallidal stimulation but have had poor therapeutic responses (< 50% improvement in relevant dystonia severity rating scale*) despite confirmation of accurate electrode position.
Able to understand study requirements - able to provide consent.
Relevant dystonia rating scales: Cervical dystonia - severity subsection of the Toronto Western Hospital spasmodic torticollis rating scale; Generalised dystonia - severity section of the Burke Fahn Marsden rating scale.
Exclusion Criteria:
None.
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Wesley Thevathasan, MBBS FRACP
Phone
07748729186
Email
wesley.thevathasan@nds.ox.ac.uk
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Julian Woollard, MMBS BSc
Phone
07779 654 944
Email
julian.woollard@doctors.org.uk
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Tipu Aziz, Professor
Organizational Affiliation
University of Oxford, Nuffield Department of Surgery
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University of Oxford, Nuffield Department of Surgery
City
Oxford
State/Province
Oxfordshire
ZIP/Postal Code
OX3 9DU
Country
United Kingdom
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Wesley Thevathasan, MBBS FRACP
Phone
07748729186
Email
wesley.thevathasan@nds.ox.ac.uk
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Julian Woollard, MBBS BSc
Phone
07779 654 944
Email
julian.woollard@doctors.org.uk
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Carole Joint
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Beth Furrow
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Julian Woollard
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Learn more about this trial
Alteration of Deep Brain Stimulation Parameters for Dystonia
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs