search
Back to results

Comparison of a Metal Backed Fixed-Bearing Tibial Baseplate and an All-Polyethylene Tibia in Total Knee Arthroplasty

Primary Purpose

Osteoarthritis, Knee

Status
Terminated
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
TKA surgery with modular polished tibial baseplate/XLK design
TKA surgery with the nonmodular APT/GVF design
P.F.C.® Sigma Knee System
P.F.C.® Sigma Knee System
Sponsored by
Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Medical Center
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Osteoarthritis, Knee focused on measuring knee arthritis, total knee arthroplasty, total knee replacement, metal backed tibial component, all-polyethylene tibia, modular polished tibial baseplate

Eligibility Criteria

60 Years - 85 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • generally accepted clinical and radiographic criteria for total knee arthroplasty

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Significant angular or bony deformity necessitating structural bone grafting or more extensive modular designs will be excluded at the discretion of the principle investigator
  • Routine contraindications to TKA (active sepsis, Charcot arthropathy)
  • Patients whose mental function preclude them from responding to our standard questionnaires

Sites / Locations

  • Minneapolis VAMC

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Modular Metal Tibial Baseplate

All Polyethylene Tibial Baseplate

Arm Description

Patients who were randomized to receive the modular polished tibial baseplate/XLK TKA

Patients who were randomized to receive the nonmodular APT/GVF TKA design.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Clinical and Functional Outcomes Based on Standardized Validated TKA Outcome Instruments (KSS, KOOS, WOMAC, SF-36)
Patient recorded outcome measures as noted

Secondary Outcome Measures

Wear Characteristics of the Standard GVF Polyethylene vs. the Moderately Cross-linked XLK Polyethylene
Wear characteristics as above

Full Information

First Posted
September 16, 2009
Last Updated
September 3, 2020
Sponsor
Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Medical Center
Collaborators
Depuy, Inc.
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00979147
Brief Title
Comparison of a Metal Backed Fixed-Bearing Tibial Baseplate and an All-Polyethylene Tibia in Total Knee Arthroplasty
Official Title
A Randomized Prospective Level 1 Comparison of a Modular Polished Fixed-Bearing Tibial Baseplate and an All-Polyethylene Tibia in Total Knee Arthroplasty
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
September 2020
Overall Recruitment Status
Terminated
Why Stopped
PI/study coordinator retired due to personal family health matters; study sponsor withdrew funding. Study terminated and no data collected or analyzed
Study Start Date
November 2007 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
May 2013 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
November 2013 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Medical Center
Collaborators
Depuy, Inc.

4. Oversight

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This study is designed to compare prospectively, in a randomized Level 1 evidence fashion, the clinical, functional, and radiographic results of a modular polished tibial (MPT) tray with a moderately cross-linked polyethylene (XLK) insert to an all-polyethylene tibial (APT) design with GVF polyethylene. Comparing these two designs will afford us information in the following areas: Does a MPT/XLK design have improved wear characteristics over a nonmodular APT/GVF design? Is there a clear clinical advantage to the MPT/XLK design in certain patient populations that justify its use over the APT/GVF design? Answering these questions will allow surgeons to use both designs appropriately in different demand populations. This study is designed to address the questions of whether an MPT/XLK design offers improvement in wear characteristics, Knee Society scores, KOOS, WOMAC, SF-36, or radiographic measures, over an APT design. The investigator's primary hypothesis is that there will be no difference in these outcome measures at a minimum two year follow-up. A secondary hypothesis based on the long-term follow-up of this group, up to twenty years, is that there will be no difference in implant survival.
Detailed Description
Summary is detailed

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Osteoarthritis, Knee
Keywords
knee arthritis, total knee arthroplasty, total knee replacement, metal backed tibial component, all-polyethylene tibia, modular polished tibial baseplate

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Participant
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
400 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Modular Metal Tibial Baseplate
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Patients who were randomized to receive the modular polished tibial baseplate/XLK TKA
Arm Title
All Polyethylene Tibial Baseplate
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Patients who were randomized to receive the nonmodular APT/GVF TKA design.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
TKA surgery with modular polished tibial baseplate/XLK design
Other Intervention Name(s)
P.F.C.® Sigma Knee System with modular XLK poly
Intervention Description
TKA surgery with modular polished tibial baseplate/XLK design
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
TKA surgery with the nonmodular APT/GVF design
Other Intervention Name(s)
P.F.C. ® Sigma Knee with an all-poly GVF tibia
Intervention Description
TKA surgery with the nonmodular APT/GVF design
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
P.F.C.® Sigma Knee System
Intervention Description
P.F.C.® Sigma Knee System with modular XLK poly
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
P.F.C.® Sigma Knee System
Intervention Description
P.F.C. ® Sigma Knee System with an all-poly GVF tibia
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Clinical and Functional Outcomes Based on Standardized Validated TKA Outcome Instruments (KSS, KOOS, WOMAC, SF-36)
Description
Patient recorded outcome measures as noted
Time Frame
2 year follow-up intervals up to 20 years
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Wear Characteristics of the Standard GVF Polyethylene vs. the Moderately Cross-linked XLK Polyethylene
Description
Wear characteristics as above
Time Frame
2 year followup intervals to 20 years

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
60 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
85 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: generally accepted clinical and radiographic criteria for total knee arthroplasty Exclusion Criteria: Significant angular or bony deformity necessitating structural bone grafting or more extensive modular designs will be excluded at the discretion of the principle investigator Routine contraindications to TKA (active sepsis, Charcot arthropathy) Patients whose mental function preclude them from responding to our standard questionnaires
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Terence J Gioe, M.D.
Organizational Affiliation
Minneapolis VAMC
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Minneapolis VAMC
City
Minneapolis
State/Province
Minnesota
ZIP/Postal Code
55417
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

Comparison of a Metal Backed Fixed-Bearing Tibial Baseplate and an All-Polyethylene Tibia in Total Knee Arthroplasty

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs