search
Back to results

Evaluation of Effectiveness and Tolerability of Tapentadol Hydrochloride in Subjects With Severe Chronic Low Back Pain Taking Either WHO Step I or Step II Analgesics or no Regular Analgesics

Primary Purpose

Chronic Pain, Low Back Pain

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Tapentadol PR
Observation period
Tapentadol PR
Sponsored by
Grünenthal GmbH
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Chronic Pain focused on measuring low back pain, pain, assessment, tapentadol, centrally acting analgesic

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Participants must have signed an Informed Consent Form.
  • Participants were men or non-pregnant, non-lactating women. Female participants must be postmenopausal, surgically sterile, or practicing an effective method of birth control. Women of childbearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test at screening.
  • Participants must be appropriately communicative to verbalize and to differentiate with regard to location and intensity of the pain.
  • Participants must be at least 18 years of age.
  • Participants must have a diagnosis of chronic low back pain; chronic pain defined as pain lasting for at least 3 months.
  • If the participant has radicular pain, this must have been present for at least 3 months and stable for the 4 weeks before enrollment.
  • Participants's pain must require a strong analgesic (defined as WHO Step III) as judged by the Investigator.
  • Participants must report a rate of satisfaction with their previous analgesic regimen not exceeding "fair" on a subject satisfaction with treatment scale (5-point VRS).
  • If under regular, daily pretreatment:

    • Participants must be taking a WHO Step I or Step II analgesic medication on a daily basis for at least 2 weeks prior to the Screening Visit.
    • The Investigator considers dose increase of WHO Step I analgesics (as mono- or combination therapy) and/or continuation with or dose increase of WHO Step II analgesics inadequate for the individual participant, whatever applicable.
    • Participants must have an average pain intensity score (NRS 3) greater than 5 points during the last 3 days prior to the Screening Visit. or
  • If no regular analgesic pretreatment is reported:

    • Participants must have an average pain intensity score (NRS-3) greater than 6 points in the last 3 days prior to the Screening Visit and related to low back pain.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of a clinically significant disease or laboratory findings that in the Investigator's opinion may affect efficacy or safety assessments.
  • Presence of active systemic or local infection that may, in the opinion of the Investigator, affect the efficacy, quality of life/function or safety assessments.
  • History of alcohol or drug abuse, or suspicion of in Investigator's judgement.
  • Presence of concomitant autoimmune inflammatory conditions.
  • Known history of or laboratory values reflecting severe renal impairment.
  • Known history of moderately or severely impaired hepatic function.
  • History of or active hepatitis B or C within the past 3 months or history of HIV infection
  • History of seizure disorder or epilepsy.
  • Any of the following within 1 year: mild/moderate traumatic brain injury, stroke, transient ischemic attack, or brain neoplasm. Severe traumatic brain injury within 15 years (consisting of 1 or more of the following: brain contusion, intracranial hematoma, either unconsciousness or post-traumatic amnesia lasting more than 24 h) or residual sequelae suggesting transient changes in consciousness.
  • Pregnant or breast-feeding.
  • History of allergy to, or hypersensitivity to tapentadol hydrochloride or its excipients, or contraindications related to tapentadol hydrochloride including:
  • Participants with acute or severe bronchial asthma or hypercapnia.
  • Participants who have or are suspected of having paralytic ileus.
  • Employees of the Investigator or trial site, with direct involvement in this trial or other trials under the direction of the Investigator or trial site, as well as family members of employees of the Investigator.
  • Participation in another trial concurrently or within 4 weeks prior to the Screening Visit.
  • Known to or suspected of not being able to comply with the protocol and the use of the investigational medicinal product.
  • Use of monoamine oxidase inhibitors within 14 days before the Screening Visit.
  • Non-stable dosing of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors within 30 days before the Screening Visit (the doses must remain stable during the trial).
  • Presence of conditions other than low back pain that could confound the assessment or self evaluation of pain, e.g., anatomical deformities, significant skin conditions such as abscess or syndromes with widespread pain such as fibromyalgia.
  • Any concomitant painful condition that could interfere with the subject's trial assessments or with their ability to differentiate low back pain from other painful conditions.
  • Any painful procedures during the trial (e.g., major surgery) that may, in the opinion of the Investigator, affect the efficacy or safety assessments.
  • Pending litigation due to chronic pain or disability.
  • Intake of Step III analgesics within the 30 days prior to the Screening Visit.

Sites / Locations

  • Site 5
  • Site 1
  • Site 2
  • Site 3
  • Site 4
  • Site 3
  • Site 2
  • Site 1
  • Site 2
  • Site 4
  • Site 3
  • Site 1
  • Site 3
  • Site 7
  • Site 4
  • Site 1
  • Site 6
  • Site 8
  • Site 5
  • Site 2
  • Site 6
  • Site 5
  • Site 2
  • Site 4
  • Site 3
  • Site 1
  • Site 1
  • Site 4
  • Site 3
  • Site 5
  • Site 1
  • Site 7
  • Site 6
  • Site 4
  • Site 8
  • Site 3
  • Site 1
  • Site 2
  • Site 7
  • Site 2
  • Site 8
  • Site 6
  • Site 1
  • Site 4
  • Site 5
  • Site 3

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm Type

Experimental

Arm Label

Tapentadol

Arm Description

Tapentadol PR was given orally twice a day. A maximum of 2 oral Tapentadol immediate release (IR) tablets per day, with a minimum of a 4 hour interval between doses, were taken if there were acute pain episodes. The total daily dose of Tapentadol PR and IR were not permitted to exceed 500 mg per day.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

The Primary Endpoint is Defined as the Change of the Average Pain Intensity Score on an 11-point NRS-3 at Week 6 From Week -1 (Baseline).
For this pain assessment, the participant was to indicate the level of average pain experienced over the previous 3 days on an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale(NRS) where a score of 0 indicated "no pain" and a score of 10 indicated "pain as bad as you can imagine". The value indicates the change from the baseline participant assessment on the 0 to 10 scale. A negative value indicates a reduction in pain intensity.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Patient Global Impression of Change at End of Titration and Optimal Dose Period
In the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) the participant indicates the perceived change over the treatment period. The participant is requested to choose one of seven categories. Scores range from very much improved to very much worse.
Patient Global Impression of Change at End of the Maintenance Period
In the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) the participant indicates the perceived change over the treatment period. The participant is requested to choose one of seven categories. Scores range from very much improved to very much worse.
Change in the Health Survey Scores Form (SF-36) at End of Titration and Optimal Dose Period
The Scores Form 36 (SF-36) includes several brief board questions on 8 aspects, (physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional and mental health) that a participant was asked to score over the last week. A higher score indicates an improvement in health. All domains are scored on a scale from 0 (negative health) to 100 (positive health), with 100 representing the best possible health state. A positive mean value indicates an improvement from baseline.
Change in the Health Survey Scores Form (SF-36) at End of Maintenance Period
The Scores Form 36 (SF-36) includes several brief board questions on 8 aspects, (physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional and mental health) that a participant was asked to score over the last week. A higher score indicates an improvement in health. All domains are scored on a scale from 0 (negative health) to 100 (positive health), with 100 representing the best possible health state. A positive mean value indicates an improvement from baseline.
painDETECT Assessment at Baseline
The painDETECT questionnaire was used to determine the possibility of the presence of a neuropathic pain component. It is a participant completed questionnaire. A total score is calculated. Participants with a score between 0 and 12 are scored as being "negative" (no neuropathic pain component). Value between 19 and 38 as being "positive" (presence of neuropathic component)". Values from 13 to 18 are scored as being "unclear".
painDETECT Assessment for Participants at End of Titration and Optimal Dose Period
The baseline painDETECT score was reassessed at the end of Week 6. It is a participant completed questionnaire. A total score is calculated. Participants with a score between 0 and 12 are scored as being "negative" (no neuropathic pain component). Value between 19 and 38 as being "positive" (presence of neuropathic component)". Values from 13 to 18 are scored as being "unclear".
painDETECT Assessment for Participants at End of the Maintenance Period
The baseline painDETECT score was reassessed at the end of Week 12. It is a participant completed questionnaire. A total score is calculated. Participants with a score between 0 and 12 are scored as being "negative" (no neuropathic pain component). Value between 19 and 38 as being "positive" (presence of neuropathic component)". Values from 13 to 18 are scored as being "unclear".
Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) Subscores and Overall Score Assessment at Baseline
Mean score NPSI (Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory). The participant rates their symptoms of neuropathic pain. Ten pain questions are answered on an 11-point scale 0 (no pain) to 10 (most intense pain imaginable). Two items related to temporal pain assessed on 5-point scales.
Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) Subscores and Overall Score at End of Titration and Optimal Dose Period
Mean score NPSI (Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory). The participant rates their symptoms of neuropathic pain. Ten pain questions are answered on an 11-point scale 0 (no pain) to 10 (most intense pain imaginable). Two items related to temporal pain assessed on 5-point scales.
Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) Subscores and Overall Score Assessment at End of the Maintenance Period
Mean score NPSI (Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory). The participant rates their symptoms of neuropathic pain. Ten pain questions are answered on an 11-point scale 0 (no pain) to 10 (most intense pain imaginable). Two items related to temporal pain assessed on 5-point scales.
Change in Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) Final Score Assessment at End of Titration and Optimal Dose Period
Change in mean score NPSI, questionnaire evaluates symptoms of neuropathic pain. Ten pain descriptors questions are answered on an 11-point scale 0 (no pain)-10 (most intense pain imaginable). The NPSI derives a total intensity score calculated from the subscores. A negative value indicates improvement in neuropathic symptoms.
Change in Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) Final Score Assessment at End of the Maintenance Period
Change in mean score NPSI, questionnaire evaluates symptoms of neuropathic pain. Ten pain descriptors questions are answered on an 11-point scale 0 (no pain)-10 (most intense pain imaginable). The NPSI derives a total intensity score calculated from the subscores. A negative value indicates improvement in neuropathic symptoms.
EuroQol-5 (EQ-5D) Health Status Index Outcome Over Time at End of Titration and Optimal Dose Period.
The participant scored the EuroQol-5. This is a five dimensional health state classification. Each dimension is assessed on a 3-point ordinal scale (1=no problems, 2=some problems, 3=extreme problems). The responses to the five EQ-5D dimensions were scored using a utility-weighted algorithm to derive an EQ-5D health status index score between 0 to 1, with 1.00 indicating "full health" and 0 representing dead. The positive values indicate that during the study the health status improved.
Change in Health Related Quality of Life: EuroQol-5D Health State Visual Analog Scale (VAS)at End of Titration and Optimal Dose Period.
EuroQoL-5D Health State Visual Analog Scale (VAS) is a participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in terms of a single index value. The VAS component rates current health state on a scale from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state); higher scores indicate a better health state. The values indicated represent the change from the baseline, a positive value indicates an improvement.
EuroQol-5 (EQ-5D) Health Status Index Outcome Over Time at End of Maintenance Period
The participant scored the EuroQol-5. This is a five dimensional health state classification. Each dimension is assessed on a 3-point ordinal scale (1=no problems, 2=some problems, 3=extreme problems). The responses to the five EQ-5D dimensions were scored using a utility-weighted algorithm to derive an EQ-5D health status index score between 0 to 1, with 1.00 indicating "full health" and 0 representing dead. The positive values indicate that during the study the health status improved.
Change in Health Related Quality of Life: EuroQol-5D Health State Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at End of Maintenance Period
EuroQoL-5D Health State Visual Analog Scale (VAS) is a participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in terms of a single index value. The VAS component rates current health state on a scale from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state); higher scores indicate a better health state. The values indicated represent the change from the baseline, a positive value indicates an improvement.
Clinical Global Impression of Change (All Participants) at End of Titration and Optimal Dose Period
In the Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) the clinician indicates the perceived change over the treatment period. The clinician is requested to choose one of seven categories. Scores range from very much improved to very much worse.
Clinical Global Impression of Change (All Participants) at End of Maintenance Period
In the Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) the clinician indicates the perceived change over the treatment period. The clinician is requested to choose one of seven categories. Scores range from very much improved to very much worse.
Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale (HADS): Anxiety Score at Baseline
Anxiety Scale - 7 items scored for each individual question from 0 = best and 3 = worst. HADS is a self-assessment scale for the symptom severity of anxiety disorders and depression. It comprises of 14 items. Seven statements describe anxiety. Each answer is scored on a four-point scale (0-3). All seven answers are summed to a total score with a maximum score of 21 points. A negative value indicates that there has been an improvement.
Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale: Change in Anxiety Score at End of Titration and Optimal Dose Period
Anxiety Scale - 7 items scored for each individual question from 0 = best and 3 = worst. HADS is a self-assessment scale for the symptom severity of anxiety disorders and depression. It comprises of 14 items. Seven statements describe anxiety. Each answer is scored on a four-point scale (0-3). All seven answers are summed to a total score with a maximum score of 21 points. A negative value indicates that there has been an improvement.
Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale: Change in Anxiety Score at End of Maintenance Period
Anxiety Scale - 7 items scored for each individual question from 0 = best and 3 = worst. HADS is a self-assessment scale for the symptom severity of anxiety disorders and depression. It comprises of 14 items. Seven statements describe anxiety. Each answer is scored on a four-point scale (0-3). All seven answers are summed to a total score with a maximum score of 21 points. A negative value indicates that there has been an improvement.
Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale: Depression Score at Baseline
Depression Scale - 7 items scored for each individual question from 0 = best and 3 = worst. HADS is a self-assessment scale for the symptom severity of anxiety disorders and depression. It comprises of 14 items. Seven statements describe anxiety. Each answer is scored on a four-point scale (0-3). All seven answers are summed to a total score with a maximum score of 21 points. A negative value indicates that there has been an improvement.
Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale: Change in Depression Score at End of Titration and Optimal Dose Period.
Depression Scale - 7 items scored for each individual question from 0 = best and 3 = worst. HADS is a self-assessment scale for the symptom severity of anxiety disorders and depression. It comprises of 14 items. Seven statements describe depression. Each answer is scored on a four-point scale (0-3). All seven answers are summed to a total score with a maximum score of 21 points. A negative value indicates that there has been an improvement.
Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale: Change in Depression Score at End of Maintenance Period
Depression Scale - 7 items scored for each individual question from 0 = best and 3 = worst. HADS is a self-assessment scale for the symptom severity of anxiety disorders and depression. It comprises of 14 items. Seven statements describe depression. Each answer is scored on a four-point scale (0-3). All seven answers are summed to a total score with a maximum score of 21 points. A negative value indicates that there has been an improvement.
Final Stable Tapentadol PR Dose in Opioid Naive Participants at End of Titration and Optimal Dose Period.
Tapentadol hydrochloride PR dose after 5 weeks of titration which was to be kept stable during the remained of the trial.
Participant's Satisfaction With Previous Analgesic Treatment at Baseline
Participants were requested to rate their previous analgesic medication on a 5-point scale. Previous analgesic medication was rated as excellent, very good, good, fair and poor.
Participant's Satisfaction With New Analgesic Treatment, i.e Tapentadol, at the End of Titration and Optimal Dose Period.
Participants were requested to rate their tapentadol (new) analgesic medication on a 5-point scale. The medication was rated as excellent, very good, good, fair and poor.
Participant's Satisfaction With New Analgesic Treatment, i.e Tapentadol, in the Maintenance Period.
Participants were requested to rate their tapentadol (new) analgesic medication on a 5-point scale. The medication was rated as excellent, very good, good, fair and poor.
Participant's Satisfaction With New Analgesic Treatment, i.e Tapentadol, at End of the Maintenance Period.
Participants were requested to rate their tapentadol (new) analgesic medication on a 5-point scale. The medication was rated as excellent, very good, good, fair and poor.
Baseline NRS-3 Pain Intensity in Participants With No Prior Opioid Treatment, at Baseline.
For this pain assessment, the participant was to indicate the level of average pain experienced over the previous 3 days on an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale(NRS) where a score of 0 indicated "no pain" and a score of 10 indicated "pain as bad as you can imagine".
NRS-3 Pain Intensity in Participants With No Prior Opioid Treatment at the End of the Titration and Optimal Dose Period.
For this pain assessment, the participant was to indicate the level of average pain experienced over the previous 3 days on an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale(NRS) where a score of 0 indicated "no pain" and a score of 10 indicated "pain as bad as you can imagine".
NRS-3 Pain Intensity in Participants With No Prior Opioid Treatment at the End of the Maintenance Period.
For this pain assessment, the participant was to indicate the level of average pain experienced over the previous 3 days on an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale(NRS) where a score of 0 indicated "no pain" and a score of 10 indicated "pain as bad as you can imagine".
Baseline NRS-3 Pain Intensity in Participants With Prior Opioid Treatment, at Baseline.
For this pain assessment, the participant was to indicate the level of average pain experienced over the previous 3 days on an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale(NRS) where a score of 0 indicated "no pain" and a score of 10 indicated "pain as bad as you can imagine".
NRS-3 Pain Intensity Assessment in Participants With Prior Opioid Treatment at the End of the Titration and Optimal Dose Period.
For this pain assessment, the participant was to indicate the level of average pain experienced over the previous 3 days on an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale(NRS) where a score of 0 indicated "no pain" and a score of 10 indicated "pain as bad as you can imagine".
NRS-3 Pain Intensity Assessment in Participants With Prior Opioid Treatment at the End of the Maintenance Period.
For this pain assessment, the participant was to indicate the level of average pain experienced over the previous 3 days on an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale(NRS) where a score of 0 indicated "no pain" and a score of 10 indicated "pain as bad as you can imagine".

Full Information

First Posted
September 23, 2009
Last Updated
December 18, 2018
Sponsor
Grünenthal GmbH
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00983385
Brief Title
Evaluation of Effectiveness and Tolerability of Tapentadol Hydrochloride in Subjects With Severe Chronic Low Back Pain Taking Either WHO Step I or Step II Analgesics or no Regular Analgesics
Official Title
An Evaluation of the Effectiveness and Tolerability of Tapentadol Hydrochloride Prolonged Release, and Tapentadol Hydrochloride Immediate Release on Demand, in Subjects With Uncontrolled Severe Chronic Nociceptive, Mixed or Neuropathic Low Back Pain Taking Either WHO Step I or Step II Analgesics or no Regular Analgesics.
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
December 2018
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
September 30, 2009 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
May 2010 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
July 6, 2010 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Grünenthal GmbH

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The main objective of the study is to evaluate the effectiveness, tolerability, and safety of tapentadol hydrochloride prolonged release in subjects suffering from severe chronic low back pain (LBP) who are taking either WHO Step I or Step II analgesics or no regular analgesics. This is a clinical effectiveness trial designed to establish a link between anticipated clinical outcomes and the clinical practice by means of selected measures of clinical and subject-reported outcome. The trial will compare the effectiveness of previous analgesic treatment (either WHO Step I or Step II analgesics or no regular analgesics) with that of tapentadol hydrochloride prolonged release (PR) treatment during defined periods of evaluation.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Chronic Pain, Low Back Pain
Keywords
low back pain, pain, assessment, tapentadol, centrally acting analgesic

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
208 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Tapentadol
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Tapentadol PR was given orally twice a day. A maximum of 2 oral Tapentadol immediate release (IR) tablets per day, with a minimum of a 4 hour interval between doses, were taken if there were acute pain episodes. The total daily dose of Tapentadol PR and IR were not permitted to exceed 500 mg per day.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Tapentadol PR
Other Intervention Name(s)
Palexia®, Nucynta®
Intervention Description
Tapentadol Prolonged Release (PR) Titration and Optimal Dose Period: Starting at 50 mg Tapentadol PR twice daily, adjusted with 50 mg PR steps (upwards or downwards) as necessary to achieve a balance between pain relief and a satisfactory level of tolerability. Participants were not permitted to exceed a dose of 500 mg of Tapentadol per day.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Observation period
Intervention Description
Eligibility assessment period to characterize the baseline over a one week period (week -1). Participants continued their previous treatment prior to allocation to tapentadol, if eligible.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Tapentadol PR
Other Intervention Name(s)
Palexia®, Nucynta®
Intervention Description
Maintenance Period: In this period participants continued Tapentadol Prolonged Release (PR) on the dose established in the Titration and Optimal Dose Period. Tapentadol IR participants were not permitted to exceed a total daily tapentadol dose of 500 mg.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
The Primary Endpoint is Defined as the Change of the Average Pain Intensity Score on an 11-point NRS-3 at Week 6 From Week -1 (Baseline).
Description
For this pain assessment, the participant was to indicate the level of average pain experienced over the previous 3 days on an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale(NRS) where a score of 0 indicated "no pain" and a score of 10 indicated "pain as bad as you can imagine". The value indicates the change from the baseline participant assessment on the 0 to 10 scale. A negative value indicates a reduction in pain intensity.
Time Frame
Baseline; End of Week 6 (6 Weeks)
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Patient Global Impression of Change at End of Titration and Optimal Dose Period
Description
In the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) the participant indicates the perceived change over the treatment period. The participant is requested to choose one of seven categories. Scores range from very much improved to very much worse.
Time Frame
Baseline; End of Week 6 (6 Weeks)
Title
Patient Global Impression of Change at End of the Maintenance Period
Description
In the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) the participant indicates the perceived change over the treatment period. The participant is requested to choose one of seven categories. Scores range from very much improved to very much worse.
Time Frame
Baseline; End of Week 12 (12 weeks)
Title
Change in the Health Survey Scores Form (SF-36) at End of Titration and Optimal Dose Period
Description
The Scores Form 36 (SF-36) includes several brief board questions on 8 aspects, (physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional and mental health) that a participant was asked to score over the last week. A higher score indicates an improvement in health. All domains are scored on a scale from 0 (negative health) to 100 (positive health), with 100 representing the best possible health state. A positive mean value indicates an improvement from baseline.
Time Frame
Baseline; End of Week 6 (6 weeks)
Title
Change in the Health Survey Scores Form (SF-36) at End of Maintenance Period
Description
The Scores Form 36 (SF-36) includes several brief board questions on 8 aspects, (physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional and mental health) that a participant was asked to score over the last week. A higher score indicates an improvement in health. All domains are scored on a scale from 0 (negative health) to 100 (positive health), with 100 representing the best possible health state. A positive mean value indicates an improvement from baseline.
Time Frame
Baseline; End of Week 12 (12 weeks)
Title
painDETECT Assessment at Baseline
Description
The painDETECT questionnaire was used to determine the possibility of the presence of a neuropathic pain component. It is a participant completed questionnaire. A total score is calculated. Participants with a score between 0 and 12 are scored as being "negative" (no neuropathic pain component). Value between 19 and 38 as being "positive" (presence of neuropathic component)". Values from 13 to 18 are scored as being "unclear".
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
painDETECT Assessment for Participants at End of Titration and Optimal Dose Period
Description
The baseline painDETECT score was reassessed at the end of Week 6. It is a participant completed questionnaire. A total score is calculated. Participants with a score between 0 and 12 are scored as being "negative" (no neuropathic pain component). Value between 19 and 38 as being "positive" (presence of neuropathic component)". Values from 13 to 18 are scored as being "unclear".
Time Frame
End of Week 6
Title
painDETECT Assessment for Participants at End of the Maintenance Period
Description
The baseline painDETECT score was reassessed at the end of Week 12. It is a participant completed questionnaire. A total score is calculated. Participants with a score between 0 and 12 are scored as being "negative" (no neuropathic pain component). Value between 19 and 38 as being "positive" (presence of neuropathic component)". Values from 13 to 18 are scored as being "unclear".
Time Frame
End of Week 12
Title
Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) Subscores and Overall Score Assessment at Baseline
Description
Mean score NPSI (Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory). The participant rates their symptoms of neuropathic pain. Ten pain questions are answered on an 11-point scale 0 (no pain) to 10 (most intense pain imaginable). Two items related to temporal pain assessed on 5-point scales.
Time Frame
Baseline Visit
Title
Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) Subscores and Overall Score at End of Titration and Optimal Dose Period
Description
Mean score NPSI (Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory). The participant rates their symptoms of neuropathic pain. Ten pain questions are answered on an 11-point scale 0 (no pain) to 10 (most intense pain imaginable). Two items related to temporal pain assessed on 5-point scales.
Time Frame
End of Week 6
Title
Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) Subscores and Overall Score Assessment at End of the Maintenance Period
Description
Mean score NPSI (Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory). The participant rates their symptoms of neuropathic pain. Ten pain questions are answered on an 11-point scale 0 (no pain) to 10 (most intense pain imaginable). Two items related to temporal pain assessed on 5-point scales.
Time Frame
End of Week 12
Title
Change in Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) Final Score Assessment at End of Titration and Optimal Dose Period
Description
Change in mean score NPSI, questionnaire evaluates symptoms of neuropathic pain. Ten pain descriptors questions are answered on an 11-point scale 0 (no pain)-10 (most intense pain imaginable). The NPSI derives a total intensity score calculated from the subscores. A negative value indicates improvement in neuropathic symptoms.
Time Frame
Baseline; End of Week 6 (6 Weeks)
Title
Change in Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) Final Score Assessment at End of the Maintenance Period
Description
Change in mean score NPSI, questionnaire evaluates symptoms of neuropathic pain. Ten pain descriptors questions are answered on an 11-point scale 0 (no pain)-10 (most intense pain imaginable). The NPSI derives a total intensity score calculated from the subscores. A negative value indicates improvement in neuropathic symptoms.
Time Frame
Baseline; End of Week 12 (12 Weeks)
Title
EuroQol-5 (EQ-5D) Health Status Index Outcome Over Time at End of Titration and Optimal Dose Period.
Description
The participant scored the EuroQol-5. This is a five dimensional health state classification. Each dimension is assessed on a 3-point ordinal scale (1=no problems, 2=some problems, 3=extreme problems). The responses to the five EQ-5D dimensions were scored using a utility-weighted algorithm to derive an EQ-5D health status index score between 0 to 1, with 1.00 indicating "full health" and 0 representing dead. The positive values indicate that during the study the health status improved.
Time Frame
Baseline; End of Week 6 (6 weeks)
Title
Change in Health Related Quality of Life: EuroQol-5D Health State Visual Analog Scale (VAS)at End of Titration and Optimal Dose Period.
Description
EuroQoL-5D Health State Visual Analog Scale (VAS) is a participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in terms of a single index value. The VAS component rates current health state on a scale from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state); higher scores indicate a better health state. The values indicated represent the change from the baseline, a positive value indicates an improvement.
Time Frame
Baseline; End of Week 6 (6 weeks)
Title
EuroQol-5 (EQ-5D) Health Status Index Outcome Over Time at End of Maintenance Period
Description
The participant scored the EuroQol-5. This is a five dimensional health state classification. Each dimension is assessed on a 3-point ordinal scale (1=no problems, 2=some problems, 3=extreme problems). The responses to the five EQ-5D dimensions were scored using a utility-weighted algorithm to derive an EQ-5D health status index score between 0 to 1, with 1.00 indicating "full health" and 0 representing dead. The positive values indicate that during the study the health status improved.
Time Frame
Baseline; End of Week 12 (12 weeks)
Title
Change in Health Related Quality of Life: EuroQol-5D Health State Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at End of Maintenance Period
Description
EuroQoL-5D Health State Visual Analog Scale (VAS) is a participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in terms of a single index value. The VAS component rates current health state on a scale from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state); higher scores indicate a better health state. The values indicated represent the change from the baseline, a positive value indicates an improvement.
Time Frame
Baseline; End of Week 12 (12 weeks)
Title
Clinical Global Impression of Change (All Participants) at End of Titration and Optimal Dose Period
Description
In the Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) the clinician indicates the perceived change over the treatment period. The clinician is requested to choose one of seven categories. Scores range from very much improved to very much worse.
Time Frame
Baseline; End of Week 6 (6 weeks)
Title
Clinical Global Impression of Change (All Participants) at End of Maintenance Period
Description
In the Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) the clinician indicates the perceived change over the treatment period. The clinician is requested to choose one of seven categories. Scores range from very much improved to very much worse.
Time Frame
Baseline; End of Week 12 (12 weeks)
Title
Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale (HADS): Anxiety Score at Baseline
Description
Anxiety Scale - 7 items scored for each individual question from 0 = best and 3 = worst. HADS is a self-assessment scale for the symptom severity of anxiety disorders and depression. It comprises of 14 items. Seven statements describe anxiety. Each answer is scored on a four-point scale (0-3). All seven answers are summed to a total score with a maximum score of 21 points. A negative value indicates that there has been an improvement.
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale: Change in Anxiety Score at End of Titration and Optimal Dose Period
Description
Anxiety Scale - 7 items scored for each individual question from 0 = best and 3 = worst. HADS is a self-assessment scale for the symptom severity of anxiety disorders and depression. It comprises of 14 items. Seven statements describe anxiety. Each answer is scored on a four-point scale (0-3). All seven answers are summed to a total score with a maximum score of 21 points. A negative value indicates that there has been an improvement.
Time Frame
Baseline; End of Week 6 (6 weeks)
Title
Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale: Change in Anxiety Score at End of Maintenance Period
Description
Anxiety Scale - 7 items scored for each individual question from 0 = best and 3 = worst. HADS is a self-assessment scale for the symptom severity of anxiety disorders and depression. It comprises of 14 items. Seven statements describe anxiety. Each answer is scored on a four-point scale (0-3). All seven answers are summed to a total score with a maximum score of 21 points. A negative value indicates that there has been an improvement.
Time Frame
Baseline; End of Week 12 (12 Weeks)
Title
Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale: Depression Score at Baseline
Description
Depression Scale - 7 items scored for each individual question from 0 = best and 3 = worst. HADS is a self-assessment scale for the symptom severity of anxiety disorders and depression. It comprises of 14 items. Seven statements describe anxiety. Each answer is scored on a four-point scale (0-3). All seven answers are summed to a total score with a maximum score of 21 points. A negative value indicates that there has been an improvement.
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale: Change in Depression Score at End of Titration and Optimal Dose Period.
Description
Depression Scale - 7 items scored for each individual question from 0 = best and 3 = worst. HADS is a self-assessment scale for the symptom severity of anxiety disorders and depression. It comprises of 14 items. Seven statements describe depression. Each answer is scored on a four-point scale (0-3). All seven answers are summed to a total score with a maximum score of 21 points. A negative value indicates that there has been an improvement.
Time Frame
Baseline; End of Week 6 (6 weeks)
Title
Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale: Change in Depression Score at End of Maintenance Period
Description
Depression Scale - 7 items scored for each individual question from 0 = best and 3 = worst. HADS is a self-assessment scale for the symptom severity of anxiety disorders and depression. It comprises of 14 items. Seven statements describe depression. Each answer is scored on a four-point scale (0-3). All seven answers are summed to a total score with a maximum score of 21 points. A negative value indicates that there has been an improvement.
Time Frame
Baseline; End of Week 12 (12 Weeks)
Title
Final Stable Tapentadol PR Dose in Opioid Naive Participants at End of Titration and Optimal Dose Period.
Description
Tapentadol hydrochloride PR dose after 5 weeks of titration which was to be kept stable during the remained of the trial.
Time Frame
Week 6
Title
Participant's Satisfaction With Previous Analgesic Treatment at Baseline
Description
Participants were requested to rate their previous analgesic medication on a 5-point scale. Previous analgesic medication was rated as excellent, very good, good, fair and poor.
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Participant's Satisfaction With New Analgesic Treatment, i.e Tapentadol, at the End of Titration and Optimal Dose Period.
Description
Participants were requested to rate their tapentadol (new) analgesic medication on a 5-point scale. The medication was rated as excellent, very good, good, fair and poor.
Time Frame
End of Week 6
Title
Participant's Satisfaction With New Analgesic Treatment, i.e Tapentadol, in the Maintenance Period.
Description
Participants were requested to rate their tapentadol (new) analgesic medication on a 5-point scale. The medication was rated as excellent, very good, good, fair and poor.
Time Frame
End of Week 8
Title
Participant's Satisfaction With New Analgesic Treatment, i.e Tapentadol, at End of the Maintenance Period.
Description
Participants were requested to rate their tapentadol (new) analgesic medication on a 5-point scale. The medication was rated as excellent, very good, good, fair and poor.
Time Frame
End of Week 12
Title
Baseline NRS-3 Pain Intensity in Participants With No Prior Opioid Treatment, at Baseline.
Description
For this pain assessment, the participant was to indicate the level of average pain experienced over the previous 3 days on an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale(NRS) where a score of 0 indicated "no pain" and a score of 10 indicated "pain as bad as you can imagine".
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
NRS-3 Pain Intensity in Participants With No Prior Opioid Treatment at the End of the Titration and Optimal Dose Period.
Description
For this pain assessment, the participant was to indicate the level of average pain experienced over the previous 3 days on an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale(NRS) where a score of 0 indicated "no pain" and a score of 10 indicated "pain as bad as you can imagine".
Time Frame
End of Week 6
Title
NRS-3 Pain Intensity in Participants With No Prior Opioid Treatment at the End of the Maintenance Period.
Description
For this pain assessment, the participant was to indicate the level of average pain experienced over the previous 3 days on an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale(NRS) where a score of 0 indicated "no pain" and a score of 10 indicated "pain as bad as you can imagine".
Time Frame
End of Week 12
Title
Baseline NRS-3 Pain Intensity in Participants With Prior Opioid Treatment, at Baseline.
Description
For this pain assessment, the participant was to indicate the level of average pain experienced over the previous 3 days on an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale(NRS) where a score of 0 indicated "no pain" and a score of 10 indicated "pain as bad as you can imagine".
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
NRS-3 Pain Intensity Assessment in Participants With Prior Opioid Treatment at the End of the Titration and Optimal Dose Period.
Description
For this pain assessment, the participant was to indicate the level of average pain experienced over the previous 3 days on an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale(NRS) where a score of 0 indicated "no pain" and a score of 10 indicated "pain as bad as you can imagine".
Time Frame
End of Week 6
Title
NRS-3 Pain Intensity Assessment in Participants With Prior Opioid Treatment at the End of the Maintenance Period.
Description
For this pain assessment, the participant was to indicate the level of average pain experienced over the previous 3 days on an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale(NRS) where a score of 0 indicated "no pain" and a score of 10 indicated "pain as bad as you can imagine".
Time Frame
End of Week 12

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Participants must have signed an Informed Consent Form. Participants were men or non-pregnant, non-lactating women. Female participants must be postmenopausal, surgically sterile, or practicing an effective method of birth control. Women of childbearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test at screening. Participants must be appropriately communicative to verbalize and to differentiate with regard to location and intensity of the pain. Participants must be at least 18 years of age. Participants must have a diagnosis of chronic low back pain; chronic pain defined as pain lasting for at least 3 months. If the participant has radicular pain, this must have been present for at least 3 months and stable for the 4 weeks before enrollment. Participants's pain must require a strong analgesic (defined as WHO Step III) as judged by the Investigator. Participants must report a rate of satisfaction with their previous analgesic regimen not exceeding "fair" on a subject satisfaction with treatment scale (5-point VRS). If under regular, daily pretreatment: Participants must be taking a WHO Step I or Step II analgesic medication on a daily basis for at least 2 weeks prior to the Screening Visit. The Investigator considers dose increase of WHO Step I analgesics (as mono- or combination therapy) and/or continuation with or dose increase of WHO Step II analgesics inadequate for the individual participant, whatever applicable. Participants must have an average pain intensity score (NRS 3) greater than 5 points during the last 3 days prior to the Screening Visit. or If no regular analgesic pretreatment is reported: Participants must have an average pain intensity score (NRS-3) greater than 6 points in the last 3 days prior to the Screening Visit and related to low back pain. Exclusion Criteria: Presence of a clinically significant disease or laboratory findings that in the Investigator's opinion may affect efficacy or safety assessments. Presence of active systemic or local infection that may, in the opinion of the Investigator, affect the efficacy, quality of life/function or safety assessments. History of alcohol or drug abuse, or suspicion of in Investigator's judgement. Presence of concomitant autoimmune inflammatory conditions. Known history of or laboratory values reflecting severe renal impairment. Known history of moderately or severely impaired hepatic function. History of or active hepatitis B or C within the past 3 months or history of HIV infection History of seizure disorder or epilepsy. Any of the following within 1 year: mild/moderate traumatic brain injury, stroke, transient ischemic attack, or brain neoplasm. Severe traumatic brain injury within 15 years (consisting of 1 or more of the following: brain contusion, intracranial hematoma, either unconsciousness or post-traumatic amnesia lasting more than 24 h) or residual sequelae suggesting transient changes in consciousness. Pregnant or breast-feeding. History of allergy to, or hypersensitivity to tapentadol hydrochloride or its excipients, or contraindications related to tapentadol hydrochloride including: Participants with acute or severe bronchial asthma or hypercapnia. Participants who have or are suspected of having paralytic ileus. Employees of the Investigator or trial site, with direct involvement in this trial or other trials under the direction of the Investigator or trial site, as well as family members of employees of the Investigator. Participation in another trial concurrently or within 4 weeks prior to the Screening Visit. Known to or suspected of not being able to comply with the protocol and the use of the investigational medicinal product. Use of monoamine oxidase inhibitors within 14 days before the Screening Visit. Non-stable dosing of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors within 30 days before the Screening Visit (the doses must remain stable during the trial). Presence of conditions other than low back pain that could confound the assessment or self evaluation of pain, e.g., anatomical deformities, significant skin conditions such as abscess or syndromes with widespread pain such as fibromyalgia. Any concomitant painful condition that could interfere with the subject's trial assessments or with their ability to differentiate low back pain from other painful conditions. Any painful procedures during the trial (e.g., major surgery) that may, in the opinion of the Investigator, affect the efficacy or safety assessments. Pending litigation due to chronic pain or disability. Intake of Step III analgesics within the 30 days prior to the Screening Visit.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Hans Kress, Prof. MD
Organizational Affiliation
Medical University / AKH Vienna
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Site 5
City
Graz
Country
Austria
Facility Name
Site 1
City
Vienna
Country
Austria
Facility Name
Site 2
City
Vienna
Country
Austria
Facility Name
Site 3
City
Vienna
Country
Austria
Facility Name
Site 4
City
Vienna
Country
Austria
Facility Name
Site 3
City
Karlovac
Country
Croatia
Facility Name
Site 2
City
Opatija
Country
Croatia
Facility Name
Site 1
City
Sisak
Country
Croatia
Facility Name
Site 2
City
Chateaugiron
Country
France
Facility Name
Site 4
City
La Seyne sur Mer
Country
France
Facility Name
Site 3
City
Murs Erigné
Country
France
Facility Name
Site 1
City
Paris
Country
France
Facility Name
Site 3
City
Berlin
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Site 7
City
Böblingen
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Site 4
City
Celle
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Site 1
City
Dresden
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Site 6
City
Hannover
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Site 8
City
Leipzig
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Site 5
City
Lünen
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Site 2
City
Wiesbaden
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Site 6
City
Bologna
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Site 5
City
Catania
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Site 2
City
Genova
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Site 4
City
Parma
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Site 3
City
Pavia
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Site 1
City
Rome
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Site 1
City
Lublin
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Site 4
City
Tychy
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Site 3
City
Wroclaw
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Site 5
City
Alicante
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Site 1
City
Badalona
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Site 7
City
Guadalajara
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Site 6
City
Madrid
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Site 4
City
Oviedo
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Site 8
City
Pamplona
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Site 3
City
Valencia
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Site 1
City
Morges
Country
Switzerland
Facility Name
Site 2
City
Valens
Country
Switzerland
Facility Name
Site 7
City
Belfast
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Site 2
City
Bristol
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Site 8
City
Chelmsford
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Site 6
City
Edinburgh
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Site 1
City
Glasgow
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Site 4
City
London
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Site 5
City
London
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Site 3
City
Plymouth
Country
United Kingdom

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Yes
IPD Sharing Plan Description
Information available on the Grünenthal Web Site
IPD Sharing URL
http://www.grunenthal.com/r-d-vision-mission/clinical-trials/data-sharing-clinical-trials
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
22443293
Citation
Steigerwald I, Muller M, Davies A, Samper D, Sabatowski R, Baron R, Rozenberg S, Szczepanska-Szerej A, Gatti A, Kress HG. Effectiveness and safety of tapentadol prolonged release for severe, chronic low back pain with or without a neuropathic pain component: results of an open-label, phase 3b study. Curr Med Res Opin. 2012 Jun;28(6):911-36. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2012.679254. Epub 2012 May 9.
Results Reference
result

Learn more about this trial

Evaluation of Effectiveness and Tolerability of Tapentadol Hydrochloride in Subjects With Severe Chronic Low Back Pain Taking Either WHO Step I or Step II Analgesics or no Regular Analgesics

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs