search
Back to results

Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (PAP) Titration and Treatment Versus Auto-adjusting PAP Treatment for Sleep Apnea

Primary Purpose

Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Continuous positive airway pressure
Auto-adjusting positive airway pressure treatment
Sponsored by
North Florida Foundation for Research and Education
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Obstructive Sleep Apnea focused on measuring sleep apnea, positive airway pressure, portable monitoring, auto positive airway pressure

Eligibility Criteria

21 Years - 89 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • OSA, Apnea-hypopnea index > 5/hour

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prior CPAP
  • Uncontrolled Depression
  • Moderate to Severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)
  • Hypoventilation
  • Average estimated nightly total sleep time < 4 hours
  • Shift work
  • Unstable depression
  • Upper airway surgery
  • Uncontrolled Restless legs syndrome (RLS), narcolepsy
  • Use of supplemental oxygen
  • Severe congestive heart failure
  • Use of nightly potent narcotics
  • Severe obesity (BMI > 40)

Sites / Locations

  • Malcom Randall VA Medical Center

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Arm Label

PSG CPAP titration then CPAP treatment

Auto-Adjusting Positive Airway Pressure

Arm Description

Patients diagnosed with sleep apnea will have a continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) titration with polysomnography (PSG) followed by continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) Treatment

Following diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea patients will be have auto-adjusting positive airway pressure treatment without a titration.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Positive Airway Pressure Adherence (Nightly Use of Treatment)
average nightly hours of using positive airway pressure (including 0 for nights not used)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Change in Epworth Sleepiness Scale
Epworth sleepiness scale (ESS) is measure of subjective sleepiness. Tendency to fall asleep in 8 situations. Total varies from zero to 24. A ESS of 10 or less is considered normal. The change in the ESS = post-treatment value - pre-treatment value. A decrease in the ESS (negative change) is consistent with less sleepiness.
Change in Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire
The functional outcomes of sleep questionnaire (FOSQ) is a standard quality of life measure used to assess improvement in quality of life after treatment for sleep disorders. The total FOSQ score was analyzed. The range if 5 to 20. A higher score is a better quality of life. This analysis compares the change after treatment (post treatment FOSQ - pretreatment FOSQ). A positive difference indicates an improve in the quality of life.
Residual Apnea-hypopnea Index
The PAP device estimate of residual apnea-hypopnea index (AHI, number of apneas and hypopneas per hour of patient use) an estimate of effectiveness of treatment. An AHI < 10 is considered adequate treatment and <5/hour ideal treatment.
Treatment Pressure (Level of CPAP or 90th Percentile APAP)
The level of CPAP used for treatment versus the 90th percentile pressure used during APAP. The 90th percentile pressure is the value that is used if one converts a patient from APAP to CPAP.

Full Information

First Posted
October 1, 2009
Last Updated
October 30, 2014
Sponsor
North Florida Foundation for Research and Education
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00988351
Brief Title
Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (PAP) Titration and Treatment Versus Auto-adjusting PAP Treatment for Sleep Apnea
Official Title
Portable Monitoring and APAP Treatment for Diagnosis and Treatment of OSA
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
October 2014
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
February 2010 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
December 2012 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
December 2012 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
North Florida Foundation for Research and Education

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The purpose of this randomized prospective study is to compare the efficacy of two approaches to initiate Positive Airway Pressure (PAP) treatment in patients diagnosed as having obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) by portable monitoring (PM) (limited sleep study). One pathway involves attended Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) titration by PSG (full attended sleep study) followed by CPAP treatment. The other pathway involves treatment with auto-adjusting positive airway pressure (APAP)(without a titration). Study Aims: Compare PAP adherence, improvement in subjective sleepiness (Epworth Sleepiness Scale), reaction time (Psychomotor vigilance test), quality of life by the Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire (FOSQ), and PAP satisfaction (PAP satisfaction questionnaire) between the two study arms.
Detailed Description
RESEARCH PLAN: All patients being evaluated for possible OSA are required to attend a Sleep Education and Evaluation Class before having a sleep study. At this class they receive information on sleep apnea, PAP treatment, and the types of sleep studies. They also complete a sleep questionnaire to identify co-existing sleep disorders and important co-morbid medical conditions. Screening of the sleep questionnaire and the patient's medical record is part of routine care to identify patients needing a diagnostic PSG and/or an attended titration. At the end of the class, participation in the current study will be offered the patients. Those signifying interest in being part of the research study and meeting inclusion and exclusion criteria will be contacted to participate in the study. Once they sign an informed consent they will be randomized to one of the two clinical pathways. METHODS: Study visits: Before informed consent (routine clinical care) Sleep Education and Evaluation Class (education about OSA, sleep studies, and OSA treatment). Patients complete screening sleep and medical history questionnaires. Determination of patient interest in participating in the current study and review of inclusion/exclusion criteria After informed consent PM study Randomization if the Portable monitoring (PM) study is diagnostic of OSA. If not, the patient will be offered a diagnostic PSG. If this is positive, they will have APAP treatment. If both the PM and PSG are negative for OSA the patient exits the study but will be followed in sleep clinic. PSG for CPAP titration (PSG arm only). CPAP/APAP setup - patient fills out Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) and Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire (FOSQ). The same Research coordinator/Respiratory therapist will setup the units, fit masks, and instruct the patients on the use of their device. Patients being treated with CPAP or APAP will be in separate classes. Telephone contact within 7 days of setup with early intervention for PAP problems if needed. Clinic visit 6 weeks after starting treatment: download objective adherence, ESS, FOSQ, and PAP satisfaction questionnaire.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Obstructive Sleep Apnea
Keywords
sleep apnea, positive airway pressure, portable monitoring, auto positive airway pressure

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
156 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
PSG CPAP titration then CPAP treatment
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Patients diagnosed with sleep apnea will have a continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) titration with polysomnography (PSG) followed by continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) Treatment
Arm Title
Auto-Adjusting Positive Airway Pressure
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Following diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea patients will be have auto-adjusting positive airway pressure treatment without a titration.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Continuous positive airway pressure
Other Intervention Name(s)
CPAP
Intervention Description
continuous positive airway pressure determined by polysomnography titration
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Auto-adjusting positive airway pressure treatment
Other Intervention Name(s)
AutoCPAP, APAP
Intervention Description
Pressure range 4-18 centimeters of water (cm H2O)
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Positive Airway Pressure Adherence (Nightly Use of Treatment)
Description
average nightly hours of using positive airway pressure (including 0 for nights not used)
Time Frame
6 weeks after starting treatment
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in Epworth Sleepiness Scale
Description
Epworth sleepiness scale (ESS) is measure of subjective sleepiness. Tendency to fall asleep in 8 situations. Total varies from zero to 24. A ESS of 10 or less is considered normal. The change in the ESS = post-treatment value - pre-treatment value. A decrease in the ESS (negative change) is consistent with less sleepiness.
Time Frame
6 weeks after starting treatment
Title
Change in Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire
Description
The functional outcomes of sleep questionnaire (FOSQ) is a standard quality of life measure used to assess improvement in quality of life after treatment for sleep disorders. The total FOSQ score was analyzed. The range if 5 to 20. A higher score is a better quality of life. This analysis compares the change after treatment (post treatment FOSQ - pretreatment FOSQ). A positive difference indicates an improve in the quality of life.
Time Frame
6 weeks at clinic
Title
Residual Apnea-hypopnea Index
Description
The PAP device estimate of residual apnea-hypopnea index (AHI, number of apneas and hypopneas per hour of patient use) an estimate of effectiveness of treatment. An AHI < 10 is considered adequate treatment and <5/hour ideal treatment.
Time Frame
over first 6 weeks of treatment
Title
Treatment Pressure (Level of CPAP or 90th Percentile APAP)
Description
The level of CPAP used for treatment versus the 90th percentile pressure used during APAP. The 90th percentile pressure is the value that is used if one converts a patient from APAP to CPAP.
Time Frame
6 weeks clinic

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
21 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
89 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: OSA, Apnea-hypopnea index > 5/hour Exclusion Criteria: Prior CPAP Uncontrolled Depression Moderate to Severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) Hypoventilation Average estimated nightly total sleep time < 4 hours Shift work Unstable depression Upper airway surgery Uncontrolled Restless legs syndrome (RLS), narcolepsy Use of supplemental oxygen Severe congestive heart failure Use of nightly potent narcotics Severe obesity (BMI > 40)
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Richard B Berry, MD
Organizational Affiliation
University of Florida/Malcom Randall VAMC
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Malcom Randall VA Medical Center
City
Gainesville
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
32608
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (PAP) Titration and Treatment Versus Auto-adjusting PAP Treatment for Sleep Apnea

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs