search
Back to results

Prevention of Arrhythmia Device Infection Trial (PADIT Pilot) (PADIT)

Primary Purpose

Arrythmias

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
Canada
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Cefazolin, Bacitracin, Cefalexin
Cefazolin
Sponsored by
Population Health Research Institute
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional prevention trial for Arrythmias focused on measuring Device procedure, pacemaker, ICD, antibiotics

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • > 18 years
  • One of the following planned device procedures:

    • ICD, pacemaker, CRT-P, CRT-D generator and/or lead replacement or
    • Pocket or lead revision or
    • System upgrade (insertion or attempted insertion of leads) or
    • New cardiac resynchronization therapy device implant (pacemaker or ICD)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unable or unwilling to provide written informed consent
  • Unable or unwilling to complete the study follow-up schedule
  • Life expectancy < 12 months as per the opinion if the local investigator
  • Allergy to or unable to tolerate cefazolin or clindamycin or vancomycin
  • Allergy to or unable to tolerate intracavitary bacitracin or gentamicin or cefazolin
  • Previously enrolled in this trial
  • In another study that would confound the results of this trial

Sites / Locations

  • Institut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Quebec

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Aggressive Antibiotic therapy

Conventional Antibiotic Therapy

Arm Description

Patients receive preoperative intravenous antibiotics, intracavitary antibiotics during surgery and postoperative antibiotics.

Preoperative intravenous antibiotics

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Hospitalization attributed to device infection.

Secondary Outcome Measures

1. Any treatment with antibiotics for suspected device infection.
2. Antibiotic therapy related adverse event.
3. Prolongation of hospitalization due to proven or suspected adverse events from the hospitalization.

Full Information

First Posted
October 27, 2009
Last Updated
May 14, 2013
Sponsor
Population Health Research Institute
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01002911
Brief Title
Prevention of Arrhythmia Device Infection Trial (PADIT Pilot)
Acronym
PADIT
Official Title
Phase III Pilot Study - A Simple Randomized Trial of Conventional Versus Multimodal Prevention of Arrhythmia Device Infection
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
May 2013
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
December 2009 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
January 2012 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
January 2012 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Population Health Research Institute

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The goal of the pilot study is to compare conventional antibiotic therapy to an aggressive antibiotic therapy plan for the prevention of arrhythmia device infection in high-risk patients undergoing arrhythmia device procedures. All antibiotics are approved for use and readily available.
Detailed Description
Infection can occur after surgery for either a pacemaker or an implantable defibrillation and can have very serious consequences. These infections are common and can be seen in as many as 2-3% of high-risk patients. Doctors use antibiotics to prevent these infections, but we do not know how much or how often to give the antibiotics to get the best effect. It is not known whether additional antibiotics during and after the operation would further reduce the risk of infection. This research study will compare two different ways of using common antibiotics to prevent infection during and following a device procedure. One way is the standard approach of a single dose before surgery and the other way uses more antibiotics. We do not know if either way is better. The purpose of this study therefore, is to compare two types of antibiotic therapy plans to better understand if one is most effective in preventing infection. This study will provide the ability to evaluate the feasibility (i.e. site activation, enrollment, compliance, drop-out) and generate proof of concept for the larger clinical trial of 12,000 patients in all 25 Canadian Hospitals implanting ICDs, which will be submitted to the CIHR. Additionally, the study supports the continued initiatives of the network of physician investigators (Canadian Heart Rhythm Society Device Advisory Committee - CHRS DAC) collaborating to address arrhythmia procedures related clinical trials that will answer simple clinical questions that will focus initially on safety issues.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Arrythmias
Keywords
Device procedure, pacemaker, ICD, antibiotics

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Prevention
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
500 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Aggressive Antibiotic therapy
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Patients receive preoperative intravenous antibiotics, intracavitary antibiotics during surgery and postoperative antibiotics.
Arm Title
Conventional Antibiotic Therapy
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Preoperative intravenous antibiotics
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Cefazolin, Bacitracin, Cefalexin
Intervention Description
Single does of Cefazolin 1-2 g iv given over 60-120 minutes, 60-120 minutes prior to skin incision, Bacitracin wash, Cefalexin 250-500 mg TID
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Cefazolin
Intervention Description
Cefazolin 1-2 g iv given over 60-120 minutes, 60-120 minutes prior to skin incision
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Hospitalization attributed to device infection.
Time Frame
Patients will have one follow-up visit at 12 months or earlier should a primary outcome event occur.
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
1. Any treatment with antibiotics for suspected device infection.
Time Frame
Patients will have one follow-up visit at 12 months
Title
2. Antibiotic therapy related adverse event.
Time Frame
Patients will have one follow-up visit at 12 months
Title
3. Prolongation of hospitalization due to proven or suspected adverse events from the hospitalization.
Time Frame
Patients will have one follow-up visit at 12 months

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: > 18 years One of the following planned device procedures: ICD, pacemaker, CRT-P, CRT-D generator and/or lead replacement or Pocket or lead revision or System upgrade (insertion or attempted insertion of leads) or New cardiac resynchronization therapy device implant (pacemaker or ICD) Exclusion Criteria: Unable or unwilling to provide written informed consent Unable or unwilling to complete the study follow-up schedule Life expectancy < 12 months as per the opinion if the local investigator Allergy to or unable to tolerate cefazolin or clindamycin or vancomycin Allergy to or unable to tolerate intracavitary bacitracin or gentamicin or cefazolin Previously enrolled in this trial In another study that would confound the results of this trial
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Dr. Andrew Krahn
Organizational Affiliation
University of British Columbia
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Institut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Quebec
City
Ste-Foy
State/Province
Quebec
ZIP/Postal Code
G1V 4G5
Country
Canada

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
34859113
Citation
Longtin Y, Gervais P, Birnie DH, Wang J, Alings M, Philippon F, Parkash R, Manlucu J, Angaran P, Rinne C, Coutu B, Low RA, Essebag V, Morillo C, Redfearn D, Toal S, Becker G, Degrace M, Thibault B, Crystal E, Tung S, LeMaitre J, Sultan O, Bennett M, Bashir J, Ayala-Paredes F, Rioux L, Hemels MEW, Bouwels LHR, Exner DV, Dorian P, Connolly SJ, Krahn AD. Impact of Choice of Prophylaxis on the Microbiology of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Infections: Insights From the Prevention of Arrhythmia Device Infection Trial (PADIT). Open Forum Infect Dis. 2021 Oct 14;8(11):ofab513. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofab513. eCollection 2021 Nov.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
31806127
Citation
Birnie DH, Wang J, Alings M, Philippon F, Parkash R, Manlucu J, Angaran P, Rinne C, Coutu B, Low RA, Essebag V, Morillo C, Redfearn D, Toal S, Becker G, Degrace M, Thibault B, Crystal E, Tung S, LeMaitre J, Sultan O, Bennett M, Bashir J, Ayala-Paredes F, Gervais P, Rioux L, Hemels MEW, Bouwels LHR, Exner DV, Dorian P, Connolly SJ, Longtin Y, Krahn AD. Risk Factors for Infections Involving Cardiac Implanted Electronic Devices. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Dec 10;74(23):2845-2854. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.09.060. Erratum In: J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 Feb 25;75(7):840-841. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 Aug 11;76(6):762.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
30545448
Citation
Krahn AD, Longtin Y, Philippon F, Birnie DH, Manlucu J, Angaran P, Rinne C, Coutu B, Low RA, Essebag V, Morillo C, Redfearn D, Toal S, Becker G, Degrace M, Thibault B, Crystal E, Tung S, LeMaitre J, Sultan O, Bennett M, Bashir J, Ayala-Paredes F, Gervais P, Rioux L, Hemels MEW, Bouwels LHR, van Vlies B, Wang J, Exner DV, Dorian P, Parkash R, Alings M, Connolly SJ. Prevention of Arrhythmia Device Infection Trial: The PADIT Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Dec 18;72(24):3098-3109. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.09.068.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Prevention of Arrhythmia Device Infection Trial (PADIT Pilot)

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs