search
Back to results

A Study Of A Novel Compound For Excessive Daytime Sleepiness Associated With Narcolepsy

Primary Purpose

Excessive Daytime Sleepiness, Narcolepsy

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Placebo
PF-03654746
Sponsored by
Pfizer
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Excessive Daytime Sleepiness focused on measuring Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study of PF-03654746 in Excessive Daytime Sleepiness associated with Narcolepsy

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 55 Years (Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • ISDC diagnosis of narcolepsy
  • Excessive Daytime Sleepiness in association with a diagnosis of narcolepsy
  • An MWT (Maintenance of Wakefulness Test) average sleep latency of under 15 minutes at Baseline

Exclusion Criteria:

  • No other diagnosed sleep disorders (e.g., sleep apnea)
  • Major medical disorders
  • Major psychiatric disorders

Sites / Locations

  • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Placebo Comparator

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Placebo

PF-03654746

Arm Description

At the end of the second arm of the study, the patient will have completed the study and have a 7-10 day follow-up visit.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Change From Baseline in Maintenance of Wakefulness Test (MWT) Score at Day 21 of Stable Dosing Phase
MWT measured ability of participant to remain awake. Participants were instructed to try and remain awake during series of six 20-minute periods in a semi-recumbent position in dark room. Each period was terminated immediately after sleep onset or at end of 20 minutes if no sleep occurred. Poorest outcome was 0 minute the best was 20 minutes.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Change From Baseline in Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) Total Score at Day 5, 10, 15, 20 of Titration Phase and Day 7, 14, 21 of Stable Dosing Phase
ESS is a simple, self-administered questionnaire which provides a measurement of the participant's general level of daytime sleepiness. The participant rates the chance that he/she would fall asleep when in 8 different situations (e.g. sitting and reading, talking to someone, etc.) commonly encountered in daily life on a scale of 0 (no daytime sleep) to 3 (maximum daytime sleep). Total score was the sum of 8 situations ranges from 0 to 24 with a higher score indicating greater daytime sleepiness.
Change From Baseline in Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) Global Score at Day 5, 10, 15, 20 of Titration Phase and Day 7, 14, 21 of Stable Dosing Phase
BFI is a subjective-completed tool for the assessment of the impact of fatigue on daily functioning. There are 3 questions that pertain specifically to level of fatigue and 6 questions regarding general activity level, mood and quality of life, all are answered on an 11-point scale, with "0" being "No fatigue at all" to "10" being "As bad as you can imagine". The global score is calculated by taking the sum of all 9 rating scales for a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 90. Higher global scores are associated with more severe fatigue.
Change From Baseline in Cataplexy Episodes at Day 7, 14, 21 of Stable Dosing Phase
Cataplexy is a medical condition in which a person suffers sudden physical collapse though remaining conscious. Cataplexy episodes is number of counts the participant had cataplexy.
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Day 21 of Stable Dosing Phase
SF-36 is a standardized survey evaluating 8 aspects of functional health and well-being: physical functioning (PF), role physical (RP), bodily pain (BP), general health (GH), vitality, social functioning (SF), role emotional (RE) and mental health (MH). The score for a section is an average of the individual question scores, which are scaled 0-100 (100=highest level of functioning).
Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale Score
CGI-I: 7-point clinician rated scale ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Clinician responded to a question: "Compared to your subject's condition at the beginning of treatment, how much has your subject changed?". Improvement was compared to baseline and was defined as a score of 1 (very much improved), 2 (much improved), or 3 (minimally improved) on the scale. Higher score = more affected.
Computer Based Objective Cognition Testing (CogState) Groton Maze Learning Task (GMLT)
GMLT: a cognitive test which assessed executive function. Participant was shown a 10 multiplied by 10 grid of tiles on a computer touch screen. A 28-step pathway was hidden among 100 possible locations. The participant was instructed to move 1 step from the start location and then continue 1 tile at a time, toward the end to find the pathway. The outcome measure was total number of errors made in attempting to learn the same hidden pathway on 5 consecutive trials at a single session. Score ranges from 0 to infinity. Lower scores meant a better performance.
Computer Based Objective Cognition Testing (CogState) Detection Speed
Detection speed: a cognitive test which assessed psychomotor function. A playing card was presented face up in the center of the screen. As soon as this happened, the participant was to press the 'Yes' key. The outcome measure was speed of performance; mean of the log10 transformed reaction time for correct responses [measured in log10 milliseconds (msec)]. Scores ranges from 2 (best) to 3.3 (worst). Lower scores meant a better performance.
Computer Based Objective Cognition Testing (CogState) Identification Speed
Identification speed: a cognitive test which assessed visual attention. A playing card was presented face up in the center of the screen. As soon as this happened, the participant had to decide whether the card was red or not. The outcome measure was speed of performance; mean of the log10 transformed reaction time for correct responses (measured in log10 msec). Score ranges from 2 (best) to 3.3 (worst). Lower scores meant a better performance.
Computer Based Objective Cognition Testing (CogState) One Card Learning
One card learning: a cognitive test which assessed visual learning. Participants were to remember which cards were previously shown in a task. The outcome measure was accuracy of performance; arcsine transformation of the square root of the proportion of correct responses. Score ranges from 0 (worse) to 1.57 (best). Higher scores meant a better performance.
Computer Based Objective Cognition Testing (CogState) Continuous Paired Associate Learning (CPAL)
CPAL: a cognitive test which assessed visual episodic learning. Participant was to learn and remember picture locations on the screen and was to tap the target on the central location to begin. As each picture was revealed, the participant was to remember where the picture was located and tap that location. The outcome measure was the number of errors made in correctly placing each of the 4 patterns in their location 4 times. Score ranges from 0 to infinity. Lower scores meant a better performance.
Computer Based Objective Cognition Testing (CogState ) Composite Score
CogState had 5 outcome measures that measured the cognitive constructs. GMLT, detection, identification, one card learning and CPAL. GMLT score range: 0 (best) to infinity (worst), detection and identification score range: 2 (best) to 3.3 (worst); One card learning score range: 0 (worse) to 1.57 (best) and CPAL score range: 0 (best) to infinity (worst). The individual score was standardized at each assessment and was then averaged to yield a composite score; total possible score: minus infinity to plus infinity. Positive composite score=improved performance.

Full Information

First Posted
October 29, 2009
Last Updated
April 8, 2014
Sponsor
Pfizer
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01006122
Brief Title
A Study Of A Novel Compound For Excessive Daytime Sleepiness Associated With Narcolepsy
Official Title
A Randomized Phase 2, Double Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multi-Center Crossover Study Of PF-03654746 As A Daily Treatment For Excessive Daytime Sleepiness (EDS) Associated With Narcolepsy
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
April 2014
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
November 2009 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
November 2010 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
November 2010 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Pfizer

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Histaminergic agents are known to be involved with the sleep/wake cycle. This compound is a histaminergic agent which therefore may improve alertness and awakeness in patients with excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) associated with narcolepsy. Significant improvement in EDS when treated with this compound compared to placebo in patients with narcolepsy is hypothesized.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Excessive Daytime Sleepiness, Narcolepsy
Keywords
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study of PF-03654746 in Excessive Daytime Sleepiness associated with Narcolepsy

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Crossover Assignment
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
95 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Placebo
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Title
PF-03654746
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
At the end of the second arm of the study, the patient will have completed the study and have a 7-10 day follow-up visit.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Placebo
Intervention Description
Patients receiving placebo will undergo the same procedures as those receiving active treatment. Each patient will receive matching placebo tablets in a fixed dose escalation schedule beginning at 0.25 mg QD for 5 days; then up to 0.50 mg QD for another 5 days; and up to 1.0 mg QD for an additional 5 days. At the end of this fixed titration schedule, the patient will either stay at 1.0 mg; decrease to 0.5 mg or increase to 2.0 mg based upon the clinicians judgment regarding efficacy and side effects at the 1.0 dose level. The patient will then remain at the determined dose for a 3 week stable dosing period, with a 7 (-2/+ 9) day wash out and then crossover to repeat the same sequence for the second arm of the study.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
PF-03654746
Intervention Description
Each patient will receive PF-03654746 tablets in a fixed dose titration schedule beginning at 0.25 mg QD for 5 days; then up to 0.50 mg QD for another 5 days; and up to 1.0 mg QD for an additional 5 days. At the end of this fixed titration schedule, the patient will either stay at the 1.0 mg dose; decrease to 0.50 mg or increase to 2.0 mg based upon the clinician's judgement regarding efficacy and side effects at the 1.0 mg dose. The patient will remain at the determined dose for a 3 week stable dosing period.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change From Baseline in Maintenance of Wakefulness Test (MWT) Score at Day 21 of Stable Dosing Phase
Description
MWT measured ability of participant to remain awake. Participants were instructed to try and remain awake during series of six 20-minute periods in a semi-recumbent position in dark room. Each period was terminated immediately after sleep onset or at end of 20 minutes if no sleep occurred. Poorest outcome was 0 minute the best was 20 minutes.
Time Frame
Baseline, Day 21 of stable dosing phase
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change From Baseline in Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) Total Score at Day 5, 10, 15, 20 of Titration Phase and Day 7, 14, 21 of Stable Dosing Phase
Description
ESS is a simple, self-administered questionnaire which provides a measurement of the participant's general level of daytime sleepiness. The participant rates the chance that he/she would fall asleep when in 8 different situations (e.g. sitting and reading, talking to someone, etc.) commonly encountered in daily life on a scale of 0 (no daytime sleep) to 3 (maximum daytime sleep). Total score was the sum of 8 situations ranges from 0 to 24 with a higher score indicating greater daytime sleepiness.
Time Frame
Baseline, Day 5, 10, 15, 20 of titration phase; Day 7, 14, 21 of stable dosing phase
Title
Change From Baseline in Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) Global Score at Day 5, 10, 15, 20 of Titration Phase and Day 7, 14, 21 of Stable Dosing Phase
Description
BFI is a subjective-completed tool for the assessment of the impact of fatigue on daily functioning. There are 3 questions that pertain specifically to level of fatigue and 6 questions regarding general activity level, mood and quality of life, all are answered on an 11-point scale, with "0" being "No fatigue at all" to "10" being "As bad as you can imagine". The global score is calculated by taking the sum of all 9 rating scales for a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 90. Higher global scores are associated with more severe fatigue.
Time Frame
Baseline, Day 5, 10, 15, 20 of titration phase; Day 7, 14, 21 of stable dosing phase
Title
Change From Baseline in Cataplexy Episodes at Day 7, 14, 21 of Stable Dosing Phase
Description
Cataplexy is a medical condition in which a person suffers sudden physical collapse though remaining conscious. Cataplexy episodes is number of counts the participant had cataplexy.
Time Frame
Baseline, Day 7, 14, 21 of stable dosing phase
Title
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Day 21 of Stable Dosing Phase
Description
SF-36 is a standardized survey evaluating 8 aspects of functional health and well-being: physical functioning (PF), role physical (RP), bodily pain (BP), general health (GH), vitality, social functioning (SF), role emotional (RE) and mental health (MH). The score for a section is an average of the individual question scores, which are scaled 0-100 (100=highest level of functioning).
Time Frame
Baseline, Day 21 of stable dosing phase
Title
Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale Score
Description
CGI-I: 7-point clinician rated scale ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Clinician responded to a question: "Compared to your subject's condition at the beginning of treatment, how much has your subject changed?". Improvement was compared to baseline and was defined as a score of 1 (very much improved), 2 (much improved), or 3 (minimally improved) on the scale. Higher score = more affected.
Time Frame
Day 5, 10, 15, 20 of titration phase; Day 7, 14, 21 of stable dosing phase
Title
Computer Based Objective Cognition Testing (CogState) Groton Maze Learning Task (GMLT)
Description
GMLT: a cognitive test which assessed executive function. Participant was shown a 10 multiplied by 10 grid of tiles on a computer touch screen. A 28-step pathway was hidden among 100 possible locations. The participant was instructed to move 1 step from the start location and then continue 1 tile at a time, toward the end to find the pathway. The outcome measure was total number of errors made in attempting to learn the same hidden pathway on 5 consecutive trials at a single session. Score ranges from 0 to infinity. Lower scores meant a better performance.
Time Frame
Baseline, Day 5, 10, 15, 20 of titration phase; Day 21 of stable dosing phase
Title
Computer Based Objective Cognition Testing (CogState) Detection Speed
Description
Detection speed: a cognitive test which assessed psychomotor function. A playing card was presented face up in the center of the screen. As soon as this happened, the participant was to press the 'Yes' key. The outcome measure was speed of performance; mean of the log10 transformed reaction time for correct responses [measured in log10 milliseconds (msec)]. Scores ranges from 2 (best) to 3.3 (worst). Lower scores meant a better performance.
Time Frame
Baseline, Day 5, 10, 15, 20 of titration phase; Day 21 of stable dosing phase
Title
Computer Based Objective Cognition Testing (CogState) Identification Speed
Description
Identification speed: a cognitive test which assessed visual attention. A playing card was presented face up in the center of the screen. As soon as this happened, the participant had to decide whether the card was red or not. The outcome measure was speed of performance; mean of the log10 transformed reaction time for correct responses (measured in log10 msec). Score ranges from 2 (best) to 3.3 (worst). Lower scores meant a better performance.
Time Frame
Baseline, Day 5, 10, 15, 20 of titration phase; Day 21 of stable dosing phase
Title
Computer Based Objective Cognition Testing (CogState) One Card Learning
Description
One card learning: a cognitive test which assessed visual learning. Participants were to remember which cards were previously shown in a task. The outcome measure was accuracy of performance; arcsine transformation of the square root of the proportion of correct responses. Score ranges from 0 (worse) to 1.57 (best). Higher scores meant a better performance.
Time Frame
Baseline, Day 5, 10, 15, 20 of titration phase; Day 21 of stable dosing phase
Title
Computer Based Objective Cognition Testing (CogState) Continuous Paired Associate Learning (CPAL)
Description
CPAL: a cognitive test which assessed visual episodic learning. Participant was to learn and remember picture locations on the screen and was to tap the target on the central location to begin. As each picture was revealed, the participant was to remember where the picture was located and tap that location. The outcome measure was the number of errors made in correctly placing each of the 4 patterns in their location 4 times. Score ranges from 0 to infinity. Lower scores meant a better performance.
Time Frame
Baseline, Day 5, 10, 15, 20 of titration phase; Day 21 of stable dosing phase
Title
Computer Based Objective Cognition Testing (CogState ) Composite Score
Description
CogState had 5 outcome measures that measured the cognitive constructs. GMLT, detection, identification, one card learning and CPAL. GMLT score range: 0 (best) to infinity (worst), detection and identification score range: 2 (best) to 3.3 (worst); One card learning score range: 0 (worse) to 1.57 (best) and CPAL score range: 0 (best) to infinity (worst). The individual score was standardized at each assessment and was then averaged to yield a composite score; total possible score: minus infinity to plus infinity. Positive composite score=improved performance.
Time Frame
Baseline, Day 5, 10, 15, 20 of titration phase; Day 21 of stable dosing phase
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data
Description
Criteria for potential clinical concern in vital signs: supine and standing systolic blood pressure (BP) less than (<) 90 millimeter of mercury (mmHg), supine and standing diastolic BP <50 mmHg, supine and standing heart rate <40 beats per minute (bpm) or >140 bpm. Number of participants who met the criteria for potential clinical concern was reported.
Time Frame
Baseline up to 7-10 days after Day 21 (stable dosing phase)
Title
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities
Description
Laboratory parameters included hematology (hemoglobin, hematocrit, red blood cell count, platelets, leukocytes, total neutrophils, eosinophils, basophils, lymphocytes, monocytes); liver function (total bilirubin, direct bilirubin, indirect bilirubin, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase, albumin, total protein); renal function (creatinine, blood urea nitrogen, uric acid, sodium, potassium, chloride, bicarbonate, calcium); urinalysis (protein, blood), and clinical chemistry (glucose). Total number of participants with laboratory abnormalities was reported.
Time Frame
Baseline up to Day 21 of stable dosing phase
Title
Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings
Description
Criteria for potential clinical concern in ECG parameters: maximum PR interval of greater than or equal to (>=) 300 milliseconds (msec), maximum QRS interval >=200 msec, maximum Fridericia's correction of QT (QTcF) interval of 450 to <480 msec, 480 to <500 msec and >=500 msec. Number of participants who met the criteria for potential clinical concern in ECG findings were reported.
Time Frame
Baseline up to Day 21 of stable dosing phase
Title
Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale Score
Description
Participant-rated questionnaire to assess sleep quality and quantity. Consists of 12-item questionnaires answered on a range of 1 to 6 for questions (Q) 3 to 12, 1 to 5 for Q1(some questions are reversed so that high score reflects more of the attributes); and Q2 answered on 0 to 24. Scores are transformed (actual raw score minus lowest possible score divided by possible raw score range multiplied by 100); total score range:0 to 100; higher score = greater intensity of attribute. The items contribute to each scale and are averaged to create 7 scale scores and 2 sleep scale index. Scales with at least one item answered was used to generate a scale score. Scales include; sleep disturbance (SD), sleep quantity, snoring, awaken short of breath (ASoB), somnolence, sleep adequacy and optimal sleep; and a 9-item overall sleep problems index(SPI) I and II Subscales range from 0-100 except for sleep quantity (SQ) ranging from0 to 24. Except for sleep quantity, higher scores=greater impairment.
Time Frame
Baseline, Day 5, 10, 15, 20 of titration phase; Day 7, 14, 21 of stable dosing phase
Title
Number of Participants With Response to Sheehan Suicidality Tracking Scale (STS)
Description
Sheehan-STS is an 8-item clinician/participant administered prospective rating scale and an indicator of trigger assessment that tracks both treatment-emergent suicidal ideation and behaviors). Items 1a, 2-6, 8 scored on 5-point Likert scale (0=not at all, 1=a little, 2=moderately, 3=very, and 4=extremely). Items 1, 1b, 7, an indicator of trigger assessment (TA) require yes/no response. Items included 1= Ever suffer any accident, 1a= Extent plan/intend to hurt yourself, 1b= Intend to die, 2= Wish dead, 3= Want to harm yourself, 4= Think about suicide, 5= Plan for a suicide, 6= Prepare for suicide (PS) with intent to die (ITD), 7= Injure yourself on purpose, 8= Attempt suicide. Result for item 1 indicates if any of the participant ever suffered any accident, 1b indicates if any of the participant intended to die, 7 indicates if any of the participant injured themselves purposely and trigger assessment indicates if any of the participant evoked trigger assessment.
Time Frame
Baseline, Day 5, 10, 15, 20 of titration phase; Day 7, 14, 21 of stable dosing phase

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
55 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: ISDC diagnosis of narcolepsy Excessive Daytime Sleepiness in association with a diagnosis of narcolepsy An MWT (Maintenance of Wakefulness Test) average sleep latency of under 15 minutes at Baseline Exclusion Criteria: No other diagnosed sleep disorders (e.g., sleep apnea) Major medical disorders Major psychiatric disorders
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Pfizer CT.gov Call Center
Organizational Affiliation
Pfizer
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Phoenix
State/Province
Arizona
ZIP/Postal Code
85006
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Phoenix
State/Province
Arizona
ZIP/Postal Code
85051
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Tucson
State/Province
Arizona
ZIP/Postal Code
85712
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Los Angeles
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
90048
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Orange
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92868
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Brandon
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33511
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
St. Petersburg
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33707
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Atlanta
State/Province
Georgia
ZIP/Postal Code
30342
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Macon
State/Province
Georgia
ZIP/Postal Code
31201
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Vernon Hills
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60061
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Crestview Hills
State/Province
Kentucky
ZIP/Postal Code
41017
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Louisville
State/Province
Kentucky
ZIP/Postal Code
40217
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Hattiesburg
State/Province
Mississippi
ZIP/Postal Code
39401
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Hattiesburg
State/Province
Mississippi
ZIP/Postal Code
39402
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Durham
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27710
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Dublin
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
43017
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Philadelphia
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
19114
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Philadelphia
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
19139
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Columbia
State/Province
South Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
29201
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Austin
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
78731
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Houston
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
77063
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

A Study Of A Novel Compound For Excessive Daytime Sleepiness Associated With Narcolepsy

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs