search
Back to results

Anal Fistula Treatment Outcome - Collagen Plug Versus Advancement Flap Surgery

Primary Purpose

Perianal Fistula

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Norway
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Anal fistula treatment
Sponsored by
University Hospital, Akershus
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Perianal Fistula

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 85 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with fistula involving > 1/3 of the external anal sphincter
  • Single, continuous fistula tract at time of inclusion (implies pre-treatment with seton)
  • Patients with previous fistula surgery can be included (max. 1 lambeau or 1 plug)
  • All patients included must be able to fill in an informed, written consent and to understand its implications and contents and to participate in the follow-up

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Fistula tract shorter than 2 cm
  • Complex fistula tract system (branching of the fistula tract)
  • Age < 18 years
  • Pregnancy
  • HIV-positivity
  • Fistula caused by malignancy
  • Tuberculosis
  • Hidrosadenitis suppurativa
  • Pilonidal sinus disease
  • No internal fistula opening found
  • Unable/contra indications to go through MRI scanning
  • Crohn´s disease
  • Ulcerative proctitis

Sites / Locations

  • Akershus University Hospital

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Advancement flap surgery

Collagen plug

Arm Description

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Anorectal fistula closing rate

Secondary Outcome Measures

Quality of life

Full Information

First Posted
November 27, 2009
Last Updated
November 28, 2016
Sponsor
University Hospital, Akershus
Collaborators
Uppsala University Hospital, University Hospital, Linkoeping, Region Örebro County
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01021774
Brief Title
Anal Fistula Treatment Outcome - Collagen Plug Versus Advancement Flap Surgery
Official Title
Comparison of Anal Fistula Treatment Outcome - Collagen Plug vs Advancement Flap Surgery. A Randomised Prospective Blinded Multi-centre Study
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
November 2016
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
November 2009 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
July 2015 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
June 2016 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
University Hospital, Akershus
Collaborators
Uppsala University Hospital, University Hospital, Linkoeping, Region Örebro County

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine whether the outcome of anal fistula repair with a collagen plug is comparable to that of repair by a mucosal advancement flap.
Detailed Description
Perianal fistula can occur as a complication to a perianal abscess. A perianal fistula is associated with significant morbidity and reduced quality of life. Anal fistulas seldom heal spontaneously and may require surgical intervention. The main purpose of the operation will be to close the fistula and preserve anal continence. The traditional surgical fistula closing techniques often show disappointing results. Today, a collagen plug for fistula treatment is commercially available. The mounting of this plug is technically easy and less invasive than the traditional closure of the fistula by making a lid of anal mucosa (advancement flap). The purpose of this study is to determine whether the outcome of anal fistula repair with a collagen plug is comparable to that of repair by a mucosal advancement flap, with regard to healing of fistula, anal continence and pain. Plug treatment has so far shown promising results, but prospective, randomised controlled trials are needed.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Perianal Fistula

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Participant
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
94 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Advancement flap surgery
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Title
Collagen plug
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Anal fistula treatment
Other Intervention Name(s)
Perianal, Lambeau technique, Anal fistula plug, Fistula, Surgical treatment
Intervention Description
A comparison of collagen plug vs advancement flap surgery
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Anorectal fistula closing rate
Time Frame
1 year
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Quality of life
Time Frame
1 year

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
85 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Patients with fistula involving > 1/3 of the external anal sphincter Single, continuous fistula tract at time of inclusion (implies pre-treatment with seton) Patients with previous fistula surgery can be included (max. 1 lambeau or 1 plug) All patients included must be able to fill in an informed, written consent and to understand its implications and contents and to participate in the follow-up Exclusion Criteria: Fistula tract shorter than 2 cm Complex fistula tract system (branching of the fistula tract) Age < 18 years Pregnancy HIV-positivity Fistula caused by malignancy Tuberculosis Hidrosadenitis suppurativa Pilonidal sinus disease No internal fistula opening found Unable/contra indications to go through MRI scanning Crohn´s disease Ulcerative proctitis
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Tom Oresland, M.D., Ph.D.
Organizational Affiliation
University Hospital, Akershus
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Akershus University Hospital
City
Lorenskog
ZIP/Postal Code
1478
Country
Norway

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
28489253
Citation
Bondi J, Avdagic J, Karlbom U, Hallbook O, Kalman D, Saltyte Benth J, Naimy N, Oresland T. Randomized clinical trial comparing collagen plug and advancement flap for trans-sphincteric anal fistula. Br J Surg. 2017 Aug;104(9):1160-1166. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10549. Epub 2017 May 10.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Anal Fistula Treatment Outcome - Collagen Plug Versus Advancement Flap Surgery

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs