search
Back to results

Evaluation of the Safety and Effectiveness of Tailored Transoral Incisionless Fundoplication (TIF) Using EsophyX for the Treatment of GERD

Primary Purpose

Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD)

Status
Withdrawn
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
Canada
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
EsophyX™ system with SerosaFuse fasteners
Sponsored by
University of Alberta
About
Eligibility
Locations
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) focused on measuring Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD), EsophyX

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 70 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 18-70 years
  • On daily PPIs for > 6 months
  • Persistent GERD symptoms despite PPI therapy
  • Anatomic disruption of the gastroesophageal valve to a Hill Grade II-III
  • Evidence of one of the following while on PPI therapy:

    • Erosive esophagitis (erosions or ulcerations during endoscopy)
    • Abnormal ambulatory pH study
    • Biopsy confirmed changes characteristic of reflux esophagitis
  • Acceptable esophageal motility (by either manometry or video esophagogram)
  • Hiatal hernia no larger than 2 cm
  • Patient willing to cooperate with post-operative dietary recommendations and assessment tests
  • Signed informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • BMI > 40
  • Hiatal hernia > 2 cm
  • Esophagitis grade D
  • Esophageal ulcer
  • Esophageal stricture
  • Esophageal motility disorder
  • Prior splenectomy
  • Pregnancy or plans for pregnancy in the next 12 months (in females)
  • Immunosuppression
  • ASA > 2
  • Portal hypertension and/or varices
  • History of previous resective gastric or esophageal surgery, cervical spine fusion, Zenker's diverticulum, esophageal epiphrenic diverticulum, achalasia, scleroderma or dermatomyositis, eosinophilic esophagitis, or cirrhosis
  • Active gastro-duodenal ulcer disease
  • Gastric outlet obstruction or stenosis
  • Gastroparesis or delayed gastric emptying confirmed by solid-phase gastric emptying study if patient complains of postprandial satiety during assessment
  • Coagulation disorders

Sites / Locations

  • CAMIS, Royal Alexandra Hospital

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

24 hour pH impedance study: change in Johnson DeMeester scores; GERD-HRQOL scores

Secondary Outcome Measures

PPI usage, GERD symptoms at 6 and 12 months vs. baseline off PPI's, total number of reflux episodes, and Symptom Association Probability while off PPI. Safety: Adverse events will be mapped to standard terms and reported.

Full Information

First Posted
December 2, 2009
Last Updated
April 27, 2015
Sponsor
University of Alberta
Collaborators
AHS Cancer Control Alberta
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01025739
Brief Title
Evaluation of the Safety and Effectiveness of Tailored Transoral Incisionless Fundoplication (TIF) Using EsophyX for the Treatment of GERD
Official Title
Phase II Study of Evaluation of the Safety and Effectiveness of Tailored Transoral Incisionless Fundoplication (TIF) Using EsophyX for the Treatment of GERD
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
April 2015
Overall Recruitment Status
Withdrawn
Why Stopped
No funding source for device purchasing
Study Start Date
January 2010 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
February 2011 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
February 2011 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
University of Alberta
Collaborators
AHS Cancer Control Alberta

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Objectives of the Study: The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the relative merits, safety and effectiveness of the tailored TIF2 procedure in treating GERD patients who have persistent GERD symptoms despite PPI therapy. The secondary objective of the study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the tailored TIF procedure in restoring the antireflux barrier and eliminating GE reflux. Type of Study: Prospective, non-randomized, uncontrolled Study Duration 12 months Number of Patients 20 Inclusion Criteria: Age 18-70 years, on daily PPIs for > 6 months, persistent GERD symptoms despite PPI therapy, anatomic disruption of the gastroesophageal valve to a Hill Grade II-III, evidence of one of the following while on PPI therapy: (1) erosive esophagitis (erosions or ulcerations during endoscopy); (2) abnormal ambulatory pH study; or (3) biopsy confirmed changes characteristic of reflux esophagitis; acceptable esophageal motility (by either manometry or video esophagogram), hiatal hernia no larger than 2 cm, patient willing to cooperate with post-operative dietary recommendations and assessment tests, signed informed consent Exclusion Criteria: BMI > 40, hiatal hernia > 2 cm, esophagitis grade D, esophageal ulcer, fixed esophageal stricture, gastric motility disorders, previous splenectomy, pregnancy (female), immunosuppression, ASA > 2, portal hypertension and/or varices, history of previous resective gastric or esophageal surgery, cervical spine fusion, Zenker's diverticulum, esophageal epiphrenic diverticulum, achalasia, scleroderma or dermatomyositis, eosinophilic esophagitis, or cirrhosis, active gastro-duodenal ulcer disease, gastric outlet obstruction or stenosis, gastroparesis or delayed gastric emptying, coagulation disorders Interventions: Treatment: Tailored transoral incisionless fundoplication (TIF2) using EsophyX system with SerosaFuse fasteners (EndoGastric Solutions, Inc., Redmond, WA, USA) Evaluation Criteria: Primary Outcome Measure 24 hour pH impedance study: change in Johnson DeMeester scores; GERD-HRQOL scores Secondary Outcome Measures PPI usage, GERD symptoms at 6 and 12 months vs. baseline off PPI's, total number of reflux episodes, and Symptom Association Probability while off PPI. Safety: Adverse events will be mapped to standard terms and reported.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD)
Keywords
Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD), EsophyX

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
0 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
EsophyX™ system with SerosaFuse fasteners
Intervention Description
The EsophyX™ system with SerosaFuse fasteners (EndoGastric Solutions, Redmond, WA, USA) was designed to reconstruct the gastroesophageal junction through anterior partial fundoplication with tailored delivery of multiple fasteners during a single-device insertion.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
24 hour pH impedance study: change in Johnson DeMeester scores; GERD-HRQOL scores
Time Frame
1, 3, 6, 12 month
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
PPI usage, GERD symptoms at 6 and 12 months vs. baseline off PPI's, total number of reflux episodes, and Symptom Association Probability while off PPI. Safety: Adverse events will be mapped to standard terms and reported.
Time Frame
1 day; 1 week; 1, 3, 6, 12 month

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
70 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Age 18-70 years On daily PPIs for > 6 months Persistent GERD symptoms despite PPI therapy Anatomic disruption of the gastroesophageal valve to a Hill Grade II-III Evidence of one of the following while on PPI therapy: Erosive esophagitis (erosions or ulcerations during endoscopy) Abnormal ambulatory pH study Biopsy confirmed changes characteristic of reflux esophagitis Acceptable esophageal motility (by either manometry or video esophagogram) Hiatal hernia no larger than 2 cm Patient willing to cooperate with post-operative dietary recommendations and assessment tests Signed informed consent Exclusion Criteria: BMI > 40 Hiatal hernia > 2 cm Esophagitis grade D Esophageal ulcer Esophageal stricture Esophageal motility disorder Prior splenectomy Pregnancy or plans for pregnancy in the next 12 months (in females) Immunosuppression ASA > 2 Portal hypertension and/or varices History of previous resective gastric or esophageal surgery, cervical spine fusion, Zenker's diverticulum, esophageal epiphrenic diverticulum, achalasia, scleroderma or dermatomyositis, eosinophilic esophagitis, or cirrhosis Active gastro-duodenal ulcer disease Gastric outlet obstruction or stenosis Gastroparesis or delayed gastric emptying confirmed by solid-phase gastric emptying study if patient complains of postprandial satiety during assessment Coagulation disorders
Facility Information:
Facility Name
CAMIS, Royal Alexandra Hospital
City
Edmonton
State/Province
Alberta
ZIP/Postal Code
T5H 3V9
Country
Canada

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
17142109
Citation
El-Serag HB. Time trends of gastroesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007 Jan;5(1):17-26. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2006.09.016. Epub 2006 Dec 4.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15383757
Citation
Lundell L. Surgery of gastroesophageal reflux disease: a competitive or complementary procedure? Dig Dis. 2004;22(2):161-70. doi: 10.1159/000080315.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15478853
Citation
Metz DC. Managing gastroesophageal reflux disease for the lifetime of the patient: evaluating the long-term options. Am J Med. 2004 Sep 6;117 Suppl 5A:49S-55S. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2004.07.009.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16798392
Citation
Moayyedi P, Talley NJ. Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Lancet. 2006 Jun 24;367(9528):2086-100. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68932-0.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
11003807
Citation
Nandurkar S, Talley NJ. Epidemiology and natural history of reflux disease. Baillieres Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2000 Oct;14(5):743-57. doi: 10.1053/bega.2000.0122.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17544105
Citation
Smout AJ. The patient with GORD and chronically recurrent problems. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2007;21(3):365-78. doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2007.01.007.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15622007
Citation
Stylopoulos N, Rattner DW. The history of hiatal hernia surgery: from Bowditch to laparoscopy. Ann Surg. 2005 Jan;241(1):185-93. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000149430.83220.7f.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
11419819
Citation
Jones MP, Sloan SS, Rabine JC, Ebert CC, Huang CF, Kahrilas PJ. Hiatal hernia size is the dominant determinant of esophagitis presence and severity in gastroesophageal reflux disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2001 Jun;96(6):1711-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2001.03926.x.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
9422620
Citation
Mittal RK. Hiatal hernia: myth or reality? Am J Med. 1997 Nov 24;103(5A):33S-39S. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(97)00318-5. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
8359662
Citation
Mittal RK. Hiatal hernia and gastroesophageal reflux: another attempt to resolve the controversy. Gastroenterology. 1993 Sep;105(3):941-3. doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(93)90917-2. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
Citation
Moss SF, Kidd M, Modlin IM. The status of the hiatus: the role of hernia in gastroesophageal reflux disease. J Clin Gastroenterol 2007;41:S144-S153
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
10201789
Citation
Rydberg L, Ruth M, Lundell L. Mechanism of action of antireflux procedures. Br J Surg. 1999 Mar;86(3):405-10. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.1999.01025.x.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15946454
Citation
Ahroni JH, Montgomery KF, Watkins BM. Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: weight loss, co-morbidities, medication usage and quality of life at one year. Obes Surg. 2005 May;15(5):641-7. doi: 10.1381/0960892053923716.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17190659
Citation
Cadiere GB, Rajan A, Rqibate M, Germay O, Dapri G, Himpens J, Gawlicka AK. Endoluminal fundoplication (ELF)--evolution of EsophyX, a new surgical device for transoral surgery. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2006;15(6):348-55. doi: 10.1080/13645700601040024.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
18580209
Citation
Jobe BA, O'Rourke RW, McMahon BP, Gravesen F, Lorenzo C, Hunter JG, Bronner M, Kraemer SJ. Transoral endoscopic fundoplication in the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease: the anatomic and physiologic basis for reconstruction of the esophagogastric junction using a novel device. Ann Surg. 2008 Jul;248(1):69-76. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31817c9630.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
18071818
Citation
Cadiere GB, Rajan A, Germay O, Himpens J. Endoluminal fundoplication by a transoral device for the treatment of GERD: A feasibility study. Surg Endosc. 2008 Feb;22(2):333-42. doi: 10.1007/s00464-007-9618-9. Epub 2007 Dec 11.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
18443855
Citation
Cadiere GB, Buset M, Muls V, Rajan A, Rosch T, Eckardt AJ, Weerts J, Bastens B, Costamagna G, Marchese M, Louis H, Mana F, Sermon F, Gawlicka AK, Daniel MA, Deviere J. Antireflux transoral incisionless fundoplication using EsophyX: 12-month results of a prospective multicenter study. World J Surg. 2008 Aug;32(8):1676-88. doi: 10.1007/s00268-008-9594-9.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16554990
Citation
Huber-Lang M, Henne-Bruns D, Schmitz B, Wuerl P. Esophageal perforation: principles of diagnosis and surgical management. Surg Today. 2006;36(4):332-40. doi: 10.1007/s00595-005-3158-5.
Results Reference
background
Citation
Bouvy ND, Witteman BPL, Jobe BA, Lorenzo C, Kraemer SJM, Gawlicka AK, McMahon B, Gravesen FH, Masclee A, Hameeteman W, Koek GH, Perry K. Tailored reconstruction of the esophagogastric junction using transoral incisionless fundoplication: a feasibility study. Surg Endosc 2008
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22648098
Citation
Witteman BP, Strijkers R, de Vries E, Toemen L, Conchillo JM, Hameeteman W, Dagnelie PC, Koek GH, Bouvy ND. Transoral incisionless fundoplication for treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease in clinical practice. Surg Endosc. 2012 Nov;26(11):3307-15. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2324-2. Epub 2012 May 31.
Results Reference
background
Citation
Bouvy ND, Witteman BPL, de Vries E, van Dam R, Greve JW, Gawlicka AK, Masclee A, Hameeteman W, Koek GH. EsophyX transoral incisionless fundoplication for the treatment of GERD in clinical practice. Gastrointest Endosc 2008
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
10403727
Citation
Lundell LR, Dent J, Bennett JR, Blum AL, Armstrong D, Galmiche JP, Johnson F, Hongo M, Richter JE, Spechler SJ, Tytgat GN, Wallin L. Endoscopic assessment of oesophagitis: clinical and functional correlates and further validation of the Los Angeles classification. Gut. 1999 Aug;45(2):172-80. doi: 10.1136/gut.45.2.172.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15046210
Citation
Jobe BA, Kahrilas PJ, Vernon AH, Sandone C, Gopal DV, Swanstrom LL, Aye RW, Hill LD, Hunter JG. Endoscopic appraisal of the gastroesophageal valve after antireflux surgery. Am J Gastroenterol. 2004 Feb;99(2):233-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2004.04042.x.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
8934159
Citation
Hill LD, Kozarek RA, Kraemer SJ, Aye RW, Mercer CD, Low DE, Pope CE 2nd. The gastroesophageal flap valve: in vitro and in vivo observations. Gastrointest Endosc. 1996 Nov;44(5):541-7. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(96)70006-8.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

Evaluation of the Safety and Effectiveness of Tailored Transoral Incisionless Fundoplication (TIF) Using EsophyX for the Treatment of GERD

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs