Seizure Advisory System Feasibility Study
Primary Purpose
Epilepsy
Status
Terminated
Phase
Phase 1
Locations
Australia
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Seizure Advisory System
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Epilepsy focused on measuring Epilepsy, Seizures, Advisory, Prediction
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Subject has disabling partial seizures and/or secondarily generalized partial seizures. Disabling refers to seizures that are severe enough to cause injuries or to significantly impair areas of function such as employment, psychological or social wellbeing, or mobility.
- Subject has failed treatment with a minimum of two AED's used in typical therapeutic dosages.
- For three months prior to enrollment, subject's anti-epileptic medication dosages have been stable and subject has had at least two disabling seizures per month, on average, with a seizure-free interval not to exceed 45 days. Seizures must be separated by a minimum of eight hours not to be considered part of a cluster. A cluster, for the purpose of this criterion, shall be considered a single seizure.
Exclusion Criteria:
- For three months prior to enrollment, subject's anti-epileptic medication dosages have not been stable, or subject has had more than 12 disabling seizures per month, on average, or there was a seizure-free interval longer than 45 days. Clinical seizures must be separated by a minimum of eight hours to not be considered part of a cluster. A cluster, for the purpose of this criterion, shall be considered a single seizure.
- Subject is implanted with pacemaker, implantable cardiac defibrillator, cardiac management product, or a medical device that interferes with the SAS or with which the SAS interferes. This includes, but is not limited to, direct brain neurostimulators, spinal cord stimulators, vagus nerve stimulators (VNS), and cochlear implants. Patients with a vagus nerve stimulator implanted but turned off through the duration of the study may be enrolled, provided their clinical status has been stable for at least one month with VNS turned off.
- Subject has been diagnosed with primary generalized seizures.
Sites / Locations
- Royal Melbourne Hospital
- St. Vincent's Hospital (Melbourne)
- Austin Health
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Label
Single Arm, Device Implant
Arm Description
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
The primary evaluation of safety will be an assessment of adverse events .
Secondary Outcome Measures
Seizure advisory performance will be assessed for the study population.
Clinical effectiveness will be evaluated.
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT01043406
First Posted
January 4, 2010
Last Updated
October 22, 2012
Sponsor
NeuroVista Corporation
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01043406
Brief Title
Seizure Advisory System Feasibility Study
Official Title
Safety and Effectiveness of a Seizure Advisory System in Epilepsy: A Feasibility Study (Victoria)
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
October 2012
Overall Recruitment Status
Terminated
Why Stopped
Sponsor restructuring.
Study Start Date
March 2010 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
August 2012 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
October 2012 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
NeuroVista Corporation
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The purpose of this prospective, single-arm, unblinded, multicenter clinical study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the NeuroVista Seizure Advisory System (SAS) in patients with medically refractory epilepsy. A total of 15 subjects will be implanted at up to three study sites.
Detailed Description
This research project aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the SAS based on how well it provides subjects with signals (or "advisories") that they can see and hear to predict their "likelihood" of having a seizure. It does this by monitoring signals in the brain. A secondary purpose of the study is to learn whether the advisories improve subject quality of life or that of their caregiver.
The SAS is made up of three main components that work together to monitor the subject's brain signals and then relay their information to the subject: the leads, the implantable telemetry unit (ITU), and the personal advisory device (PAD). The leads will be placed on different areas of the subject's brain to record electrical signals. The leads are tunneled down the neck to an ITU that is implanted in the chest, similar to a pacemaker. The ITU wirelessly transmits information to the PAD, which is carried like a pager. It records and processes brain signals and may be able to advise subjects when a seizure is likely or unlikely to occur.
Following implantation with the SAS, subjects will return for five study visits for neurological examinations and quality of life assessments. Throughout the study, subjects must maintain their SAS; which includes daily recharging and data card replacement.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Epilepsy
Keywords
Epilepsy, Seizures, Advisory, Prediction
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 1
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
15 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Single Arm, Device Implant
Arm Type
Experimental
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Seizure Advisory System
Intervention Description
Implant of Seizure Advisory System followed by data collection for algorithm training and subsequent enabling of seizure advisory indicators.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
The primary evaluation of safety will be an assessment of adverse events .
Time Frame
Adverse events through the primary safety endpoint four months post-implant.
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Seizure advisory performance will be assessed for the study population.
Time Frame
At the primary advisory performance endpoint at the conclusion of the Data Collection Phase (approximately 3 months post-implant) .
Title
Clinical effectiveness will be evaluated.
Time Frame
At the primary clinical effectiveness endpoint 4 months following the commencement of the Advisory Phase (approximately 7 months post-implant)
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Subject has disabling partial seizures and/or secondarily generalized partial seizures. Disabling refers to seizures that are severe enough to cause injuries or to significantly impair areas of function such as employment, psychological or social wellbeing, or mobility.
Subject has failed treatment with a minimum of two AED's used in typical therapeutic dosages.
For three months prior to enrollment, subject's anti-epileptic medication dosages have been stable and subject has had at least two disabling seizures per month, on average, with a seizure-free interval not to exceed 45 days. Seizures must be separated by a minimum of eight hours not to be considered part of a cluster. A cluster, for the purpose of this criterion, shall be considered a single seizure.
Exclusion Criteria:
For three months prior to enrollment, subject's anti-epileptic medication dosages have not been stable, or subject has had more than 12 disabling seizures per month, on average, or there was a seizure-free interval longer than 45 days. Clinical seizures must be separated by a minimum of eight hours to not be considered part of a cluster. A cluster, for the purpose of this criterion, shall be considered a single seizure.
Subject is implanted with pacemaker, implantable cardiac defibrillator, cardiac management product, or a medical device that interferes with the SAS or with which the SAS interferes. This includes, but is not limited to, direct brain neurostimulators, spinal cord stimulators, vagus nerve stimulators (VNS), and cochlear implants. Patients with a vagus nerve stimulator implanted but turned off through the duration of the study may be enrolled, provided their clinical status has been stable for at least one month with VNS turned off.
Subject has been diagnosed with primary generalized seizures.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Warren D Sheffield, VMD, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
NeuroVista Corporation
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Royal Melbourne Hospital
City
Melbourne
State/Province
Victoria
ZIP/Postal Code
3050
Country
Australia
Facility Name
St. Vincent's Hospital (Melbourne)
City
Melbourne
State/Province
Victoria
ZIP/Postal Code
3065
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Austin Health
City
Melbourne
State/Province
Victoria
ZIP/Postal Code
3081
Country
Australia
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
18827312
Citation
Snyder DE, Echauz J, Grimes DB, Litt B. The statistics of a practical seizure warning system. J Neural Eng. 2008 Dec;5(4):392-401. doi: 10.1088/1741-2560/5/4/004. Epub 2008 Sep 30.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23642342
Citation
Cook MJ, O'Brien TJ, Berkovic SF, Murphy M, Morokoff A, Fabinyi G, D'Souza W, Yerra R, Archer J, Litewka L, Hosking S, Lightfoot P, Ruedebusch V, Sheffield WD, Snyder D, Leyde K, Himes D. Prediction of seizure likelihood with a long-term, implanted seizure advisory system in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy: a first-in-man study. Lancet Neurol. 2013 Jun;12(6):563-71. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(13)70075-9. Epub 2013 May 2.
Results Reference
derived
Learn more about this trial
Seizure Advisory System Feasibility Study
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs