search
Back to results

Santyl vs. Sharp Debridement of Diabetic Foot Wounds

Primary Purpose

Diabetic Foot Ulcers, Foot Wounds

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 4
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Santyl
Control
Sponsored by
Healthpoint
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Diabetic Foot Ulcers focused on measuring Diabetic Foot Ulcers, Diabetic Foot Wounds

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • The informed consent document must be read, signed, and dated by the subject or the subject's legally authorized representative before conducting any study procedures or exams. In addition, the informed consent document must be signed and dated by the individual who consents the subject before conducting Visit 1. A photocopy of the signed informed consent document must be provided to the subject, and the original signed document placed in the subject's chart.
  • Subjects 18 years of age or older. Subjects may be of either sex and of any race or skin type provided that their skin color, in the opinion of the investigator, will not interfere with the study assessments.
  • Willing to make all required study visits.
  • Able to follow instructions and perform the dressing changes at home, or, have a caregiver who can perform the dressing changes according to the protocol.
  • Willing to use the Darco (orthopedic) shoe off-loading device and insole, if appropriate, starting on the day of screening and running through the follow-up phase.
  • A history of Type I or Type II Diabetes Mellitus requiring insulin or oral hypoglycemic medications to normalize blood glucose levels.

A foot wound which is:

  • Superficial, involving the full skin thickness but not underlying tissues and is 0.5 cm2 to 10 cm2 in measured surface area at screening visit (not yet debrided)
  • Chronic, defined as open for 30 days
  • On a neuropathic foot, defined as inability to perceive 10 grams pressure using a Semmes-Weinstein 5.07 or equivalent monofilament in the periwound area
  • Adequately perfused, defined as TcPO2 > 40 mmHg; or toe pressure > 40 mmHg, or Doppler waveform consistent with adequate flow in the foot (biphasic or triphasic waveforms) at screening.

    • Acceptable state of health and nutrition with:
  • Serum albumin ≥ 2.0 g/dL (20g/L)
  • Pre-albumin levels of ≥ 15 mg/dL (0.15g/L).

    • Per Screening lab chemistry† report:
  • Alkaline phosphatase <500 U/L
  • Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) <200 U/L
  • Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) <175 U/L
  • Serum total bilirubin <3.0 mg/dL
  • Serum blood urea nitrogen (BUN) < 75 mg/dL
  • Serum creatinine 4.5 mg/dL
  • HbA1c 12%

    • Per Screening lab hematology† report:
  • Hemoglobin (Hgb) > 8.0 g/dL
  • White blood cells (WBC) > 2.0 109/L
  • Absolute neutrophil count > 1.0 109/L
  • Platelet count > 50 109/L.

    • Local laboratories will be used, but the ranges for inclusion are set based on Healthpoint Data Management ranges. Refer to Appendix 18.1.2.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Contraindications or hypersensitivity to the use of the study medications or their components (refer to product labels).
  • Target wound does not require debridement, or is covered with dry eschar.
  • Uncontrolled bleeding disorder.
  • Untreated cellulitis extending >2 cm around the target wound, untreated lymphangitic streaking, spread beneath the superficial fascia, deep-tissue abscess, gangrene, or infection of muscle, tendon, joint or bone.
  • Infection in a patient with systemic toxicity or metabolic instability (e.g., fever, chills, tachycardia, hypotension, confusion, vomiting, leukocytosis, acidosis, severe hyperglycemia, or azotemia).
  • Any of the following:

    • Target wound tunneling per probing and visual assessment
    • Osteomyelitis of the target foot or wound probes to bone
    • Target wound is on the heel
    • Target wound is over a Charcot deformity which cannot be offloaded.
  • Diagnosis of chronic granulomatous disease, leukocyte adhesion defects or severe neutropenia
  • Treatment with any of the following:

    • Systemic corticosteroids
    • Immunosuppressive agent(s)
    • Chemotherapeutic agent(s)
    • Antiviral agent(s)
    • Platelet-derived growth factor
    • Living skin equivalent
    • Dermal substitute
    • Radiation therapy to the target lower extremity within 30 days prior to signing the informed consent document.
    • Currently on systemic antibiotic therapy
  • Any medical condition judged by the Medical Monitor and/or Investigator to cause the study to be detrimental to the subject (specify on the reason for screen failure if this applies).

Sites / Locations

  • Foot Research
  • St. Elizabeth Regional Medical Center
  • Advanced Regional Center for Ankle and Foot Care
  • St. Mary Medical Center
  • Paddington Testing Company, Inc.
  • Arlington Research Center
  • UNTHSC Fort Worth
  • Robert Wunderlich
  • Providence Health Center

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Sham Comparator

Arm Label

Santyl

Control

Arm Description

2 mm Santyl applied once daily

Daily gauze and optional sharp debridement

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Bates-Jensen Wound Assessment Score - Modified (BWAT-m)
The Bates-Jensen Wound Assessment Score was used to collect information about the wound bed appearance in each of 8 categories (sub-scales) each with a possible score of 1 to 5. For each sub-scale intact skin was scored a one (1) while a five (5) would indicate the worst possible rating. All scores were combined to compute a total score for each arm/group, with a score of 8 indicating intact skin (minimum summed score), and a score of 40 indicating the worst possible rating (maximum summed score).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Percent of Wound Area Change From Baseline at End of Treatment
Percent of Wound Area Change From Baseline at the End of 12 Week Follow-up

Full Information

First Posted
January 25, 2010
Last Updated
October 23, 2012
Sponsor
Healthpoint
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01056198
Brief Title
Santyl vs. Sharp Debridement of Diabetic Foot Wounds
Official Title
Comparison of Sharp Surgical Debridement Versus Collagenase Santyl Ointment in the Care of Diabetic Foot Wounds
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
October 2012
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
February 2010 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
August 2011 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
November 2011 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Healthpoint

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This study tests two different approaches to the removal of dead tissue from the surface of a wound.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Diabetic Foot Ulcers, Foot Wounds
Keywords
Diabetic Foot Ulcers, Diabetic Foot Wounds

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 4
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
48 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Santyl
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
2 mm Santyl applied once daily
Arm Title
Control
Arm Type
Sham Comparator
Arm Description
Daily gauze and optional sharp debridement
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Santyl
Intervention Description
2 mm Santyl applied once daily.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Control
Intervention Description
Daily gauze and optional sharp debridement
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Bates-Jensen Wound Assessment Score - Modified (BWAT-m)
Description
The Bates-Jensen Wound Assessment Score was used to collect information about the wound bed appearance in each of 8 categories (sub-scales) each with a possible score of 1 to 5. For each sub-scale intact skin was scored a one (1) while a five (5) would indicate the worst possible rating. All scores were combined to compute a total score for each arm/group, with a score of 8 indicating intact skin (minimum summed score), and a score of 40 indicating the worst possible rating (maximum summed score).
Time Frame
baseline and 28 days
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Percent of Wound Area Change From Baseline at End of Treatment
Time Frame
baseline and 28 days
Title
Percent of Wound Area Change From Baseline at the End of 12 Week Follow-up
Time Frame
baseline and 84 days

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: The informed consent document must be read, signed, and dated by the subject or the subject's legally authorized representative before conducting any study procedures or exams. In addition, the informed consent document must be signed and dated by the individual who consents the subject before conducting Visit 1. A photocopy of the signed informed consent document must be provided to the subject, and the original signed document placed in the subject's chart. Subjects 18 years of age or older. Subjects may be of either sex and of any race or skin type provided that their skin color, in the opinion of the investigator, will not interfere with the study assessments. Willing to make all required study visits. Able to follow instructions and perform the dressing changes at home, or, have a caregiver who can perform the dressing changes according to the protocol. Willing to use the Darco (orthopedic) shoe off-loading device and insole, if appropriate, starting on the day of screening and running through the follow-up phase. A history of Type I or Type II Diabetes Mellitus requiring insulin or oral hypoglycemic medications to normalize blood glucose levels. A foot wound which is: Superficial, involving the full skin thickness but not underlying tissues and is 0.5 cm2 to 10 cm2 in measured surface area at screening visit (not yet debrided) Chronic, defined as open for 30 days On a neuropathic foot, defined as inability to perceive 10 grams pressure using a Semmes-Weinstein 5.07 or equivalent monofilament in the periwound area Adequately perfused, defined as TcPO2 > 40 mmHg; or toe pressure > 40 mmHg, or Doppler waveform consistent with adequate flow in the foot (biphasic or triphasic waveforms) at screening. Acceptable state of health and nutrition with: Serum albumin ≥ 2.0 g/dL (20g/L) Pre-albumin levels of ≥ 15 mg/dL (0.15g/L). Per Screening lab chemistry† report: Alkaline phosphatase <500 U/L Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) <200 U/L Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) <175 U/L Serum total bilirubin <3.0 mg/dL Serum blood urea nitrogen (BUN) < 75 mg/dL Serum creatinine 4.5 mg/dL HbA1c 12% Per Screening lab hematology† report: Hemoglobin (Hgb) > 8.0 g/dL White blood cells (WBC) > 2.0 109/L Absolute neutrophil count > 1.0 109/L Platelet count > 50 109/L. Local laboratories will be used, but the ranges for inclusion are set based on Healthpoint Data Management ranges. Refer to Appendix 18.1.2. Exclusion Criteria: Contraindications or hypersensitivity to the use of the study medications or their components (refer to product labels). Target wound does not require debridement, or is covered with dry eschar. Uncontrolled bleeding disorder. Untreated cellulitis extending >2 cm around the target wound, untreated lymphangitic streaking, spread beneath the superficial fascia, deep-tissue abscess, gangrene, or infection of muscle, tendon, joint or bone. Infection in a patient with systemic toxicity or metabolic instability (e.g., fever, chills, tachycardia, hypotension, confusion, vomiting, leukocytosis, acidosis, severe hyperglycemia, or azotemia). Any of the following: Target wound tunneling per probing and visual assessment Osteomyelitis of the target foot or wound probes to bone Target wound is on the heel Target wound is over a Charcot deformity which cannot be offloaded. Diagnosis of chronic granulomatous disease, leukocyte adhesion defects or severe neutropenia Treatment with any of the following: Systemic corticosteroids Immunosuppressive agent(s) Chemotherapeutic agent(s) Antiviral agent(s) Platelet-derived growth factor Living skin equivalent Dermal substitute Radiation therapy to the target lower extremity within 30 days prior to signing the informed consent document. Currently on systemic antibiotic therapy Any medical condition judged by the Medical Monitor and/or Investigator to cause the study to be detrimental to the subject (specify on the reason for screen failure if this applies).
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Herbert B Slade, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Healthpoint, Ltd.
Official's Role
Study Chair
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Herbert B Slade, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Healthpoint, Ltd
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Foot Research
City
Phoenix
State/Province
Arizona
ZIP/Postal Code
85015
Country
United States
Facility Name
St. Elizabeth Regional Medical Center
City
Lincoln
State/Province
Nebraska
ZIP/Postal Code
68510
Country
United States
Facility Name
Advanced Regional Center for Ankle and Foot Care
City
Altoona
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
16602
Country
United States
Facility Name
St. Mary Medical Center
City
Langhorne
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
19047
Country
United States
Facility Name
Paddington Testing Company, Inc.
City
Philadelphia
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
19103
Country
United States
Facility Name
Arlington Research Center
City
Arlington
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
76011
Country
United States
Facility Name
UNTHSC Fort Worth
City
Fort Worth
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
76107
Country
United States
Facility Name
Robert Wunderlich
City
San Antonio
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
78212
Country
United States
Facility Name
Providence Health Center
City
Waco
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
76712
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
24145042
Citation
Tallis A, Motley TA, Wunderlich RP, Dickerson JE Jr, Waycaster C, Slade HB; Collagenase Diabetic Foot Ulcer Study Group. Clinical and economic assessment of diabetic foot ulcer debridement with collagenase: results of a randomized controlled study. Clin Ther. 2013 Nov;35(11):1805-20. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2013.09.013. Epub 2013 Oct 18.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Santyl vs. Sharp Debridement of Diabetic Foot Wounds

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs