search
Back to results

A Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of Bendamustine Compared With Bendamustine+Obinutuzumab (GA101) in Participants With Rituximab-Refractory, Indolent Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (GADOLIN)

Primary Purpose

Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Obinutuzumab
Bendamustine
Sponsored by
Genentech, Inc.
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma focused on measuring follicular, follicular lymphoma

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • History of histologically documented, B-lymphocyte antigen cluster of differentiation 20 plus (CD20+), iNHL
  • Refractory to any previous regimen containing rituximab (defined by participants who did not respond or who progressed during or up to 6 months after treatment with rituximab or a rituximab-containing regimen)
  • Previously treated with a maximum of four unique chemotherapy containing treatment regimens
  • All participants must have at least one bi-dimensionally measurable lesion (greater than [>]1.5 centimeters (cm) in its largest dimension by computed tomography [CT] scan)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prior use of any monoclonal antibody (other than anti-CD20) within 3 months prior to the start of Cycle 1, prior treatment with obinutuzumab was not allowed
  • Chemotherapy or other investigational therapy within 28 days prior to the start of Cycle 1
  • Prior treatment with bendamustine (within 2 years of the start of Cycle 1)
  • Prior allogeneic stem cell transplant
  • History of severe allergic or anaphylactic reactions to monoclonal antibody therapy
  • History of sensitivity to mannitol
  • Central nervous system lymphoma or prior diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), histological evidence of transformation to high grade or diffuse large B-cell lymphoma
  • History of other malignancy that could affect compliance with the protocol or interpretation of results
  • Evidence of significant, uncontrolled concomitant diseases that could affect compliance with the protocol or interpretation of results
  • Known active bacterial, viral, fungal, mycobacterial, parasitic, or other infection (excluding fungal infections of nail beds) or any major episode of infection requiring treatment with intravenous antibiotics or hospitalization within 4 weeks
  • Participants with a history of confirmed progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML)
  • Vaccination with a live vaccine a minimum of 28 days prior to randomization
  • Recent major surgery (within 4 weeks), other than for diagnosis
  • Presence of positive test results for Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg); antibody to hepatitis B core antigen [anti-HBc]) with detectable viral load (positive hepatitis B virus [HBV] deoxyribo-nucleic acid [DNA]) or Hepatitis C
  • Participants with chronic hepatitis B or seropositive occult (HBV) infection
  • Participants with seronegative occult HBV infection or past HBV infection (defined as anti-HBc positive and HBV DNA negative) could be eligible if they were willing to be followed according to the protocol for HBV DNA testing
  • Participants positive for Hepatitis C virus (HCV) antibody were eligible only if polymerase chain reaction(PCR) was negative for HCV Ribonucleic acid (RNA)
  • Known history of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) seropositive status
  • Positive test results for human T-lymphotropic virus type I (HTLV 1) virus in endemic countries
  • Women who are pregnant or lactating
  • Fertile men or women of childbearing potential unless 1) surgically sterile or 2) using an adequate measure of contraception such as oral contraceptives, intrauterine device, or barrier method of contraception in conjunction with spermicidal jelly
  • Ongoing corticosteroid use >30 milligrams per day (mg/day) prednisone or equivalent

Sites / Locations

  • Southern Cancer Center, PC
  • Dr. Donald W. Hill, MD, FACP
  • Highlands Oncology Group
  • Kaiser Permanente - Bellflower
  • Bay Area Cancer Research Group, LLC
  • Sharp Memorial Hospital
  • Georgetown University Medical Center Lombardi Cancer Center
  • Washington DC VA Med Center; Hematology
  • University of Florida
  • University of Florida; Division of Hematology/Oncology
  • Md Anderson Cancer Center Orlando
  • Rush Cancer Institute
  • Quincy Medical Group
  • Simmons Cancer Institute
  • University of Iowa
  • Univ Louisville School of Med
  • New England Cancer Specialists
  • Meritus Center for Clinical Research
  • Capitol Comprehensive CA Care
  • Hackensack University Medical Center
  • Hematology Oncology Assoc SJ
  • San Juan Oncology
  • The Mark H. Zangmeister Ctr; Mid Ohio Onc/Hem Inc.
  • OHSU Knight Cancer Institute
  • Pacific Oncology, PC
  • OHSU Ctr for Health & Healing
  • Thomas Jefferson University Hospital
  • Western Pennsylvania Hospital
  • Sanford Health System
  • South Texas Inst of Cancer
  • University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
  • Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
  • Univ of Wisconsin Hosp & Clin
  • Lkh-Univ. Klinikum Graz
  • Lkh Salzburg - Univ. Klinikum Salzburg; Iii. Medizinische Abt.
  • Medizinische Universität Wien
  • ZNA Stuivenberg
  • AZ Groeninge
  • CHU Ambroise Paré
  • Cross Cancer Institute
  • British Columbia Cancer Agency
  • British Columbia Cancer Agency
  • Manitoba Cancer Care
  • Moncton Hospital
  • Toronto East General Hospital; Main Pharmacy G Wing Basement
  • Princess Margaret Hospital
  • CHUM-Hosp Notre Dame
  • McGill University; Sir Mortimer B Davis Jewish General Hospital; Oncology
  • CHA Hopital de I enfant-Jesus
  • Allan Blair Cancer Centre
  • Fakultni nemocnice Brno; Interni hematologicka a onkologicka klinika
  • Fakultni nemocnice Hradec Kralove
  • I Interni klinika; Vseobecna fakultni nemocnice
  • Institut Bergonie; Hematologie Oncologie
  • Polyclinique Bordeaux Nord
  • Hopital Henri Mondor
  • CH Dijon
  • Centre d'oncologie-radiotherap
  • Hopital Claude Huriez
  • Centre Leon Berard
  • Hopital Bon Secour
  • CHU Hopital Saint Eloi
  • Hopital Hotel Dieu Et Hme; Clinique Dermatologique
  • Hopital Necker
  • Hopital Saint Louis; Dermatologie 1
  • CHU Bordeaux
  • Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud; Hematolgie
  • Chu De Poitiers; Chu La Miletrie
  • CHU de Reims
  • Hopital Pontchaillou
  • Centre Henri Becquerel
  • Clinique Ste Anne
  • CHRU de; Maladies, Vasculaires
  • St. Johannes Hospital Duisburg
  • Klinikum Frankfurt Höchst
  • Asklepios Klinik St. Georg
  • Universitaetsklinikum Leipzig
  • Klinikum der Universitat Munchen, Campus Grobhadern;; Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik III
  • Schwarzwald-Baar Klinikum GmbH
  • Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria di Modena
  • Azienda Ospedaliera Univ, Ematologica
  • Azienda Ospedaliera Univ
  • Universita La Sapienza
  • Irccs Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori (Int);S.C. Medicina Oncologica 2
  • Irccs Policlinico San Matteo; Divisione Di Ematologia
  • Azienda Ospedale San Giovanni
  • Ospedale Mauriziano Umberto I
  • Ospedale Vito Fazzi
  • Azienda Ospedaliero Univ
  • Azienda Ospedaliera Univ
  • VU MEDISCH CENTRUM; Dept. of Medical Oncology
  • Haga Ziekenhuis
  • Albert Schweitzer Ziekenhuis
  • Universitair Medisch Centrum Groningen
  • Erasmus Mc - Daniel Den Hoed Kliniek; Medical Oncology
  • Erasmus MC
  • Regional Oncology Hospital
  • Blokhin Cancer Research Center; Combined Treatment
  • City Clin Hosp n.a. S.P.Botkin
  • Russian Hema Res Ctr of RAMS
  • Republican Clinical Hospital n.a. Baranov; Haematology
  • Ryazan Regional Clinical Hosp
  • St. Petersburg State Medical University n.a. I.P. Pavlov; Hematology, transfusiology and transplanta
  • SRI of Hematology and Transfusiology
  • Clinica Universitaria de Navarra
  • Hospital Univ. Nuestra Señora de Valme;
  • Hospital Universitario Basurto
  • Hospital Universitario de la Princesa; Servicio de Hematologia
  • Hospital Universitario La Paz
  • Skånes University Hospital, Skånes Department of Onclology
  • Hematology Center; Karolinska Univ Hosp
  • Norrlands Uni Hospital; Onkologi Avd.
  • Onc Clin, Akademiska Sjukhuset
  • Universitaetsspital Basel; Onkologie
  • Inselspital Bern; Universitätsklinik für medizinische Onkologie
  • Kantonsspital Graubünden;Onkologie und Hämatologie
  • Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre
  • Leicester Royal Infirmary
  • Barts & London School of Med; Medical Oncology
  • Freeman Hospital
  • Singleton Hospital; Pharmacy Department

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Experimental

Arm Label

Bendamustine Alone

Obinutuzumab + Bendamustine

Arm Description

Participants will receive bendamustine 120 milligrams per meter square (mg/m^2) Intravenous (IV) infusion on Days 1 and 2 of each 28-day cycle for up to six cycles.

Induction phase: Participants will receive bendamustine 90 mg/m^2 IV on Days 2 and 3 of Cycle 1 and on Days 1 and 2 of Cycles 2-6 (28-day cycles) for the first 10 participants and on Days 1 and 2 of each 28-day cycle for Cycles 1-6 for remaining participants. Participants will also receive obinutuzumab 1000 mg IV infusion on Days 1, 8, and 15 of Cycle 1; Day 1 of Cycles 2-6. Maintenance phase: Participants with complete response (CR), partial response (PR) or stable response (SD) then will receive obinutuzumab 1000 mg IV infusion every 2 months until disease progression or for up to 2 years (whichever occurs first).

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Number of Participants With Progressive Disease (PD) as Assessed by Independent Review Committee (IRC) or Death
PD was assessed by an IRC according to the modified response criteria for indolent Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (iNHL) (Modified Cheson et al, 2007). PD was defined as appearance of any new lesion more than 1.5 centimeters (cm) in any axis during or at the end of therapy, even if other lesions are decreasing in size; at least a 50 percent (%) increase from nadir in the sum of product diameter (SPD) of any previously involved nodes, or in a single involved node, or the size of other lesions (example: splenic or hepatic nodules). To be considered PD, a lymph node with a diameter of the short axis of less than (<) 1.0 cm must increase by greater than or equal to (≥) 50% and to a size of 1.5 multiplied by 1.5 cm or more than 1.5 cm in the long axis; at least a 50% increase in the longest diameter of any single previously identified node greater than (>) 1 cm in its short axis.
Progression-Free Survival (PFS) as Assessed by IRC
PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the first occurrence of PD or death as assessed by an IRC according to the modified response criteria for iNHL (Modified Cheson et al, 2007). PD was defined as appearance of any new lesion more than 1.5 cm in any axis during or at the end of therapy, even if other lesions are decreasing in size; at least a 50% increase from nadir in the SPD of any previously involved nodes, or in a single involved node, or the size of other lesions (e.g., splenic or hepatic nodules). To be PD, a lymph node with a diameter of the short axis of <1.0 cm must increase by ≥ 50% and to a size of 1.5 multiplied by 1.5 cm or more than 1.5 cm in the long axis; at least a 50% increase in the longest diameter of any single previously identified node >1 cm in its short axis. PFS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method and 95% confidence interval (CI) for median was computed using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Number of Participants With PD or Death as Assessed by Investigator
PD was assessed by an investigator according to the modified response criteria for iNHL (Modified Cheson et al, 2007). PD was defined as appearance of any new lesion more than 1.5 cm in any axis during or at the end of therapy, even if other lesions are decreasing in size; at least a 50% increase from nadir in the SPD of any previously involved nodes, or in a single involved node, or the size of other lesions (e.g., splenic or hepatic nodules). To be considered PD, a lymph node with a diameter of the short axis of <1.0 cm must increase by ≥ 50% and to a size of 1.5 multiplied by 1.5 cm or more than 1.5 cm in the long axis; at least a 50% increase in the longest diameter of any single previously identified node >1 cm in its short axis.
PFS as Assessed by Investigator
PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the first occurrence of PD as assessed by an investigator according to the modified response criteria for iNHL (Modified Cheson et al, 2007), or death from any cause on study. PD was defined as appearance of any new lesion more than 1.5 cm in any axis during or at the end of therapy, even if other lesions are decreasing in size; at least a 50% increase from nadir in the SPD of any previously involved nodes, or in a single involved node, or the size of other lesions (e.g., splenic or hepatic nodules). To be considered PD, a lymph node with a diameter of the short axis of <1.0 cm must increase by ≥ 50% and to a size of 1.5 multiplied by 1.5 cm or more than 1.5 cm in the long axis; at least a 50% increase in the longest diameter of any single previously identified node >1 cm in its short axis. PFS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method and 95% CI for median was computed using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley.
Percentage of Participants With Objective Response as Assessed by IRC
Objective response was defined as having CR or PR as assessed according to the modified response criteria for iNHL (Modified Cheson et al, 2007). CR: Complete disappearance of all detectable clinical evidence of disease and disease-related symptoms if present prior to therapy, liver and spleen have returned to normal size (if enlarged at baseline), If the bone marrow was involved by lymphoma prior to treatment, the infiltrate must have cleared on repeat bone marrow biopsy. PR: at least 50% regression of measurable disease compared to tumors measured by a baseline scan and no new sites; no increase in the size of the other nodes, liver, or spleen; with the exception of splenic and hepatic nodules, involvement of other organs is usually assessable and no measurable disease should be present. IRC review was performed up clinical cutoff date of to 1 May 2015.
Percentage of Participants With Objective Response as Assessed by Investigator
Objective response was defined as having CR or PR as assessed according to the modified response criteria for iNHL (Modified Cheson et al, 2007). CR: Complete disappearance of all detectable clinical evidence of disease and disease-related symptoms if present prior to therapy, liver and spleen have returned to normal size (if enlarged at baseline), If the bone marrow was involved by lymphoma prior to treatment, the infiltrate must have cleared on repeat bone marrow biopsy. PR: at least 50% regression of measurable disease compared to tumors measured by a baseline scan and no new sites; no increase in the size of the other nodes, liver, or spleen; with the exception of splenic and hepatic nodules, involvement of other organs is usually assessable and no measurable disease should be present.
Percentage of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) as Assessed by IRC
BOR observed during assessment period according to modified response criteria for iNHL (Modified Cheson et al, 2007). CR: complete disappearance of all detectable clinical evidence of disease & disease-related symptoms if present prior to therapy, PR: at least 50% regression of measurable disease compared to tumors measured by baseline scan & no new sites; no increase in size of other nodes, liver, or spleen; with exception of splenic & hepatic nodules, involvement of other organs is usually assessable & no measurable disease should be present, SD: Failing to attain criteria needed for a CR/PR, but not fulfilling those for PD, PD: appearance of any new lesion >1.5 cm in any axis during or at end of therapy, even if other lesions are decreasing in size; at least a 50% increase from nadir in SPD of any previously involved nodes, or in single involved node, or size of other lesions (e.g., splenic or hepatic nodules). IRC review was performed up clinical cutoff date of to 1 May 2015.
Percentage of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) as Assessed by Investigator
BOR: best response for a participant, observed during assessment period according to modified response criteria for iNHL (Modified Cheson et al, 2007). CR: complete disappearance of all detectable clinical evidence of disease and disease-related symptoms if present prior to therapy, PR: at least 50% regression of measurable disease compared to tumors measured by baseline scan and no new sites; no increase in size of other nodes, liver, or spleen; with exception of splenic and hepatic nodules, involvement of other organs is usually assessable and no measurable disease should be present, SD: Failing to attain the criteria needed for a CR or PR, but not fulfilling those for PD, PD: appearance of any new lesion more than 1.5 cm in any axis during or at the end of therapy, even if other lesions are decreasing in size; at least a 50% increase from nadir in the SPD of any previously involved nodes, or in single involved node, or the size of other lesions (e.g., splenic or hepatic nodules).
Percentage of Participants With BOR at the End of Induction Treatment as Assessed by IRC
BOR observed during assessment period according to modified response criteria for iNHL (Modified Cheson et al, 2007). CR: complete disappearance of all detectable clinical evidence of disease & disease-related symptoms if present prior to therapy, PR: at least 50% regression of measurable disease compared to tumors measured by a baseline scan & no new sites; no increase in size of other nodes, liver or spleen; with exception of splenic & hepatic nodules, involvement of other organs is usually assessable & no measurable disease should be present, SD: Failing to attain criteria needed for a CR/PR, but not fulfilling those for PD, PD: appearance of any new lesion >1.5 cm in any axis during or at end of therapy, even if other lesions are decreasing in size; at least a 50% increase from nadir in the SPD of any previously involved nodes, or in a single involved node, or size of other lesions (e.g., splenic/hepatic nodules). IRC review was performed up clinical cutoff date of to 1 May 2015.
Percentage of Participants With BOR at the End of Induction Treatment as Assessed by Investigator
BOR: best response for a participant, observed during assessment period according to modified response criteria for iNHL (Modified Cheson et al, 2007). CR: complete disappearance of all detectable clinical evidence of disease and disease-related symptoms if present prior to therapy, PR: at least 50% regression of measurable disease compared to tumors measured by a baseline scan and no new sites; no increase in size of other nodes, liver, or spleen; with exception of splenic and hepatic nodules, involvement of other organs is usually assessable and no measurable disease should be present, SD: Failing to attain criteria needed for a CR or PR, but not fulfilling those for PD, PD: appearance of any new lesion more than 1.5 cm in any axis during or at the end of therapy, even if other lesions are decreasing in size; at least a 50% increase from nadir in the SPD of any previously involved nodes, or in a single involved node, or the size of other lesions (e.g., splenic or hepatic nodules).
Percentage of Participants With Objective Response at the End of Induction Treatment as Assessed by IRC
Objective response was defined as having CR or PR as assessed according to the modified response criteria for iNHL (Modified Cheson et al, 2007). CR: Complete disappearance of all detectable clinical evidence of disease and disease-related symptoms if present prior to therapy, liver and spleen have returned to normal size (if enlarged at baseline), If the bone marrow was involved by lymphoma prior to treatment, the infiltrate must have cleared on repeat bone marrow biopsy. PR: at least 50% regression of measurable disease compared to tumors measured by a baseline scan and no new sites; no increase in the size of the other nodes, liver, or spleen; with the exception of splenic and hepatic nodules, involvement of other organs is usually assessable and no measurable disease should be present. IRC review was performed up clinical cutoff date of to 1 May 2015.
Percentage of Participants With Objective Response at the End of Induction Treatment as Assessed by Investigator
Objective response was defined as having CR or PR as assessed according to the modified response criteria for iNHL (Modified Cheson et al, 2007). CR: Complete disappearance of all detectable clinical evidence of disease and disease-related symptoms if present prior to therapy, liver and spleen have returned to normal size (if enlarged at baseline), If the bone marrow was involved by lymphoma prior to treatment, the infiltrate must have cleared on repeat bone marrow biopsy. PR: at least 50% regression of measurable disease compared to tumors measured by a baseline scan and no new sites; no increase in the size of the other nodes, liver, or spleen; with the exception of splenic and hepatic nodules, involvement of other organs is usually assessable and no measurable disease should be present.
Duration of Response (DoR) as Assessed by IRC
DoR: time from first objective response of CR/PR to first occurrence of PD/relapse/death from any cause. CR: Complete disappearance of all detectable evidence of disease & disease-related symptoms if present before therapy; liver, spleen returned to normal size; if bone marrow involved by lymphoma before treatment, infiltrate must be cleared on repeat bone marrow biopsy. PR: at least 50% measurable disease regressed vs. to baseline scan and no new sites; no increase in size of other nodes/liver/spleen, exception: splenic, hepatic nodules; other organs involved is usually assessable; no measurable disease present. PD: any new lesion >1.5 cm in any axis appear during or at end of therapy, even if other lesions are decreasing in size; at least 50% increase from nadir in SPD of any previously involved nodes, or in single involved node, or size of other lesions. DoR estimated using Kaplan-Meier method. IRC review performed up to clinical cutoff date 1 May 2015.
Duration of Response (DoR) as Assessed by Investigator
DoR: time from first objective response of CR/PR to first occurrence of PD/relapse/death from any cause. CR: Complete disappearance of all detectable clinical evidence of disease and disease-related symptoms if present prior to therapy; liver, spleen returned to normal size (if enlarged at baseline); if bone marrow was involved by lymphoma prior to treatment, infiltrate must have cleared on repeat bone marrow biopsy. PR: at least 50% regression of measurable disease compared to baseline scan and no new sites; no increase in size of other nodes, liver, or spleen; with exception of splenic, hepatic nodules; involvement of other organs is usually assessable; no presence of measurable disease. PD: appearance of any new lesion >1.5 cm in any axis during or at end of therapy, even if other lesions are decreasing in size; at least 50% increase from nadir in SPD of any previously involved nodes, or in single involved node, or size of other lesions. DoR was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method.
Disease-Free Survival (DFS) in Participants With CR as Assessed by IRC
DFS was defined as the time from the first occurrence of a documented CR until progression on the basis of the IRC assessments (as per modified response criteria for iNHL [Modified Cheson et al, 2007]) or death from any cause on study. CR: Complete disappearance of all detectable clinical evidence of disease and disease-related symptoms if present prior to therapy, liver and spleen have returned to normal size (if enlarged at baseline), If the bone marrow was involved by lymphoma prior to treatment, the infiltrate must have cleared on repeat bone marrow biopsy. PD: appearance of any new lesion >1.5 cm in any axis during or at end of therapy, even if other lesions are decreasing in size; at least a 50% increase from nadir in SPD of any previously involved nodes, or in a single involved node, or size of other lesions. DFS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method. IRC review was performed up clinical cutoff date of to 1 May 2015.
Disease-Free Survival (DFS) in Participants With CR as Assessed by Investigator
DFS was defined as the time from the first occurrence of a documented CR until progression on the basis of the IRC assessments (as per modified response criteria for iNHL [Modified Cheson et al, 2007]) or death from any cause on study. CR: Complete disappearance of all detectable clinical evidence of disease and disease-related symptoms if present prior to therapy, liver and spleen have returned to normal size (if enlarged at baseline), If the bone marrow was involved by lymphoma prior to treatment, the infiltrate must have cleared on repeat bone marrow biopsy. PD: appearance of any new lesion >1.5 cm in any axis during or at end of therapy, even if other lesions are decreasing in size; at least a 50% increase from nadir in SPD of any previously involved nodes, or in a single involved node, or size of other lesions. DFS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method.
Event-free Survival (EFS) as Assessed by IRC
EFS was defined as the time between the date of randomization and the date of PD/relapse based on IRC assessments (as per modified response criteria for iNHL [Modified Cheson et al, 2007]), death from any cause on study, or start of a new anti-lymphoma therapy. PD: appearance of any new lesion >1.5 cm in any axis during or at end of therapy, even if other lesions are decreasing in size; at least a 50% increase from nadir in SPD of any previously involved nodes, or in a single involved node, or size of other lesions. EFS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method. IRC review was performed up clinical cutoff date of to 1 May 2015.
Percentage of Participants Who Died
Overall Survival (OS)
OS was defined as the time between the date of randomization and the date of death from any cause. OS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method and 95% CI for median was computed using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley.
Change From Baseline (CFB) in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lymphoma (FACT-Lym)-Physical Well Being Sub-scale Score
The FACT-Lym measures 5 sub-scales which includes 42 items; responses to each item range from 0, "Not at all" to 4, "Very much". Total score ranges from 0-168. Physical Well-being sub-scale includes 7 items measured on 0-4 point scale. The total score for physical well-being sub-scale is sum of each 7 items (range: 0-28). Higher scores indicate a better participant-reported outcome (PRO)/quality of life (QoL). In timeframe, follow-up months represents months after end of induction (e.g. Follow-up Month 2 is 2 months after end of induction) and extension follow-up months represents months after end of 2 years normal follow-up (e.g. extension follow-up Month 6 is 6 months after end of normal 2 year follow-up).
CFB in FACT-Lym-Social/Family Well-being Sub-scale Score
The FACT-Lym measures 5 sub-scales which includes 42 items; responses to each item range from 0, "Not at all" to 4, "Very much". Total score ranges from 0-168. Social/family Well-being sub-scale includes 7 items measured on 0-4 point scale. The total score for social/family well-being sub-scale is sum of each 7 items (range: 0-28). Higher scores indicate a better PRO/QoL. In timeframe, follow-up months represents months after end of induction (e.g. Follow-up Month 2 is 2 months after end of induction) and extension follow-up months represents months after end of 2 years normal follow-up (e.g. extension follow-up Month 6 is 6 months after end of normal 2 year follow-up).
CFB in FACT-Lym-Emotional Well-Being Sub-scale Score
The FACT-Lym measures 5 sub-scales which includes 42 items; responses to each item range from 0, "Not at all" to 4, "Very much". Total score ranges from 0-168. Emotional Well-being sub-scale includes 6 items measured on 0-4 point scale. The total score for emotional well-being sub-scale is sum of each 6 items (range: 0-24). Higher scores indicate a better PRO/QoL. In timeframe, follow-up months represents months after end of induction (e.g. Follow-up Month 2 is 2 months after end of induction) and extension follow-up months represents months after end of 2 years normal follow-up (e.g. extension follow-up Month 6 is 6 months after end of normal 2 year follow-up).
CFB in FACT-Lym-Functional Well-Being Sub-scale Score
The FACT-Lym measures 5 sub-scales which includes 42 items; responses to each item range from 0, "Not at all" to 4, "Very much". Total score ranges from 0-168. Functional Well-being sub-scale includes 7 items measured on 0-4 point scale. The total score for functional well-being sub-scale is sum of each 7 items (range: 0-28). Higher scores indicate a better PRO/QoL. In timeframe, follow-up months represents months after end of induction (e.g. Follow-up Month 2 is 2 months after end of induction) and extension follow-up months represents months after end of 2 years normal follow-up (e.g. extension follow-up Month 6 is 6 months after end of normal 2 year follow-up).
CFB in FACT-Lym-Lymphoma Sub-scale Score
The FACT-Lym measures 5 sub-scales which includes 42 items; responses to each item range from 0, "Not at all" to 4, "Very much". Total score ranges from 0-168. Lymphoma scale includes 15 items measured on 0-4 point scale. The total score for lymphoma sub-scale is sum of each 15 items (range: 0-60). Higher scores indicate a better PRO/QoL. In timeframe, follow-up months represents months after end of induction (e.g. Follow-up Month 2 is 2 months after end of induction) and extension follow-up months represents months after end of 2 years normal follow-up (e.g. extension follow-up Month 6 is 6 months after end of normal 2 year follow-up).
CFB in Euro Quality of Life 5 Dimension (EuroQoL-5D/EQ-5D) - Health State Profile Utility Score During Induction Phase
EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in terms of a single utility score. Health State Profile component assesses level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression; 1 indicates better health state (no problems); 3 indicates worst health state ("confined to bed"). Scoring formula developed by EuroQoL Group assigns a utility value for each domain in the profile. Score is transformed and results in a total score range -0.594 to 1.000; higher score indicates a better health state. In timeframe, follow-up months represents months after end of induction (e.g. Follow-up Month 2 is 2 months after end of induction). For 'Obinutuzumab + Bendamustine' arm, participants who had their follow-up Month 2 and 4 visits before start of maintenance treatment were reported in induction phase results under "CFB at Follow-up Month 2" and "CFB at Follow-up Month 4" categories.
CFB in EuroQol 5D (EQ-5D) - Health State Profile Utility Score During Maintenance Phase
EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in terms of a single utility score. Health State Profile component assesses level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression; 1 indicates better health state (no problems); 3 indicates worst health state ("confined to bed"). Scoring formula developed by EuroQoL Group assigns a utility value for each domain in the profile. Score is transformed and results in a total score range -0.594 to 1.000; higher score indicates a better health state. Data for this outcome was planned to be reported only for 'Obinutuzumab + Bendamustine' arm. In timeframe, follow-up months represents months after end of induction (e.g. Follow-up Month 2 is 2 months after end of induction). Follow-up months were during maintenance phase.
CFB in EQ-5D Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score During Induction Phase
EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in terms of a single index value. The VAS component rates current health state on a scale from 0 millimeter (mm) (worst imaginable health state) to 100 mm (best imaginable health state); higher scores indicate a better health state. In timeframe, follow-up months represents months after end of induction (e.g. Follow-up Month 2 is 2 months after end of induction). For 'Obinutuzumab + Bendamustine' arm, participants who had their follow-up Month 2 and 4 visits before start of maintenance treatment were reported in induction phase results under "CFB at Follow-up Month 2" and "CFB at Follow-up Month 4" categories.
CFB in EQ-5D VAS Score During Maintenance Phase
EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in terms of a single index value. The VAS component rates current health state on a scale from 0 mm (worst imaginable health state) to 100 mm (best imaginable health state); higher scores indicate a better health state. Data for this outcome was planned to be reported only for 'Obinutuzumab + Bendamustine' arm. In timeframe, follow-up months represents months after end of induction (e.g. Follow-up Month 2 is 2 months after end of induction). Follow-up months were during maintenance phase.
CFB in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Generic (FACT-G) Score
The FACT-G is the sum of 4 sub-scales (physical, social, emotional and functional well-being) of FACT-Lym which includes total 27 items; responses to each item range from 0, "Not at all" to 4, "Very much". Total score ranges from 0-108. Higher scores indicate a better PRO/QoL. In timeframe, follow-up months represents months after end of induction (e.g. Follow-up Month 2 is 2 months after end of induction) and extension follow-up months represents months after end of 2 years normal follow-up (e.g. extension follow-up Month 6 is 6 months after end of normal 2 year follow-up).
CFB in FACT-Lym Trial Outcome Index (TOI)
TOI is the sum of 3 sub-scales (physical well-being, functional well-being, and Lymphoma sub-scale) of FACT-Lym which includes total 29 items; responses to each item range from 0, "Not at all" to 4, "Very much". Total score ranges from 0-116. Higher scores indicate a better PRO/QoL. In timeframe, follow-up months represents months after end of induction (e.g. Follow-up Month 2 is 2 months after end of induction) and extension follow-up months represents months after end of 2 years normal follow-up (e.g. extension follow-up Month 6 is 6 months after end of normal 2 year follow-up).
CFB in FACT-Lym Total Score
FACT-Lym total score is the sum of physical well-being score (7 items), social/family well-being (7 items), emotional well-being (6 items), functional well-being (7 items), and Lymphoma sub-scale (15 items); responses to each item range from 0, "Not at all" to 4, "Very much". Total score ranges from 0-168. Higher scores indicate a better PRO/QoL. In timeframe, follow-up months represents months after end of induction (e.g. Follow-up Month 2 is 2 months after end of induction) and extension follow-up months represents months after end of 2 years normal follow-up (e.g. extension follow-up Month 6 is 6 months after end of normal 2 year follow-up).
Time to Deterioration of FACT-Lym TOI
The median time, in month, from date of randomization until a clinically meaningful decline from baseline in TOI or death, whichever occurred first. TOI: sum of physical well-being score,functional well-being score, and Lymphoma sub-scale of FACT-Lym; total 29 items, responses to each item range from 0, "Not at all" to 4, "Very much". Total score ranges from 0-116. Higher scores indicate a better PRO/QoL. A clinically meaningful decline in TOI score was defined as at least a 6 point decline from baseline. Time to deterioration was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method and 95% CI for median was computed using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley. In timeframe, follow-up months represents months after end of induction (EOI) (e.g. Follow-up Month 2 is 2 months after end of induction) and extension follow-up months represents months after end of 2 years normal follow-up (e.g. extension follow-up Month 6 is 6 months after end of normal 2 year follow-up).
Percentage of Participants With Definitive Improvement (DI) From Baseline in FACT-Lym Instrument Scores
FACT-Lym: 42-items in 5 subscales. Responses to each item range from 0 (Not at all) to 4 (Very much). FACT-Lym Lymphoma subscale includes 15 items (total score range = 0-60). FACT-Lym TOI is sum of 3 subscales (physical well-being, functional well-being, lymphoma subscale) and includes 29 items (total score range = 0-116). FACT-Lym total score is sum of 42 items (total score ranges from 0-168). For all above, higher scores indicate a better PRO/QoL. DI from baseline: at least 3 point increase from baseline in FACT-Lym Lymphoma subscale; at least 6 point increase from baseline in FACT Lym TOI; at least 7 point increase from baseline in FACT Lym total scores. In timeframe, follow-up months represents months after EOI (e.g. Follow-up Month 2 is 2 months after EOI; EOI = up to Month 6).

Full Information

First Posted
January 28, 2010
Last Updated
December 20, 2019
Sponsor
Genentech, Inc.
Collaborators
Roche Pharma AG
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01059630
Brief Title
A Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of Bendamustine Compared With Bendamustine+Obinutuzumab (GA101) in Participants With Rituximab-Refractory, Indolent Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (GADOLIN)
Official Title
An Open-Label, Multicenter, Randomized, Phase III Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of Bendamustine Compared With Bendamustine+RO5072759 (GA101) in Patients With Rituximab-Refractory, Indolent Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
December 2019
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
April 30, 2010 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
September 30, 2014 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
November 30, 2018 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Genentech, Inc.
Collaborators
Roche Pharma AG

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This open-label, multicenter, randomized Phase III study will investigate the efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics and pharmacoeconomics of obinutuzumab (RO5072759, GA101) combined with bendamustine followed by continued obinutuzumab treatment (maintenance monotherapy) compared with bendamustine alone treatment in participants with rituximab-refractory indolent Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (iNHL). The end of study was defined to when safety follow-up for all patients had been completed (2 years' safety follow-up from last dose).

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma
Keywords
follicular, follicular lymphoma

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
413 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Bendamustine Alone
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Participants will receive bendamustine 120 milligrams per meter square (mg/m^2) Intravenous (IV) infusion on Days 1 and 2 of each 28-day cycle for up to six cycles.
Arm Title
Obinutuzumab + Bendamustine
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Induction phase: Participants will receive bendamustine 90 mg/m^2 IV on Days 2 and 3 of Cycle 1 and on Days 1 and 2 of Cycles 2-6 (28-day cycles) for the first 10 participants and on Days 1 and 2 of each 28-day cycle for Cycles 1-6 for remaining participants. Participants will also receive obinutuzumab 1000 mg IV infusion on Days 1, 8, and 15 of Cycle 1; Day 1 of Cycles 2-6. Maintenance phase: Participants with complete response (CR), partial response (PR) or stable response (SD) then will receive obinutuzumab 1000 mg IV infusion every 2 months until disease progression or for up to 2 years (whichever occurs first).
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Obinutuzumab
Other Intervention Name(s)
RO5072759; GA101
Intervention Description
IV infusion.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Bendamustine
Intervention Description
IV infusion.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Number of Participants With Progressive Disease (PD) as Assessed by Independent Review Committee (IRC) or Death
Description
PD was assessed by an IRC according to the modified response criteria for indolent Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (iNHL) (Modified Cheson et al, 2007). PD was defined as appearance of any new lesion more than 1.5 centimeters (cm) in any axis during or at the end of therapy, even if other lesions are decreasing in size; at least a 50 percent (%) increase from nadir in the sum of product diameter (SPD) of any previously involved nodes, or in a single involved node, or the size of other lesions (example: splenic or hepatic nodules). To be considered PD, a lymph node with a diameter of the short axis of less than (<) 1.0 cm must increase by greater than or equal to (≥) 50% and to a size of 1.5 multiplied by 1.5 cm or more than 1.5 cm in the long axis; at least a 50% increase in the longest diameter of any single previously identified node greater than (>) 1 cm in its short axis.
Time Frame
Baseline until PD or death, whichever occurred first (assessed at baseline, 14 days prior to Cycle [Cy] 4 Day 1 [1 Cy=28days], 28-42 days after Cy 6 Day 1, then every 3 months up to 2 years and every 6 months for next 2 years [up to 4.5 years overall])
Title
Progression-Free Survival (PFS) as Assessed by IRC
Description
PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the first occurrence of PD or death as assessed by an IRC according to the modified response criteria for iNHL (Modified Cheson et al, 2007). PD was defined as appearance of any new lesion more than 1.5 cm in any axis during or at the end of therapy, even if other lesions are decreasing in size; at least a 50% increase from nadir in the SPD of any previously involved nodes, or in a single involved node, or the size of other lesions (e.g., splenic or hepatic nodules). To be PD, a lymph node with a diameter of the short axis of <1.0 cm must increase by ≥ 50% and to a size of 1.5 multiplied by 1.5 cm or more than 1.5 cm in the long axis; at least a 50% increase in the longest diameter of any single previously identified node >1 cm in its short axis. PFS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method and 95% confidence interval (CI) for median was computed using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley.
Time Frame
Baseline until PD or death, whichever occurred first (assessed at baseline, 14 days prior to Cy 4 Day 1 [1 Cy=28days], 28-42 days after Cy 6 Day 1, then every 3 months up to 2 years and every 6 months for next 2 years [up to 4.5 years overall])
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Number of Participants With PD or Death as Assessed by Investigator
Description
PD was assessed by an investigator according to the modified response criteria for iNHL (Modified Cheson et al, 2007). PD was defined as appearance of any new lesion more than 1.5 cm in any axis during or at the end of therapy, even if other lesions are decreasing in size; at least a 50% increase from nadir in the SPD of any previously involved nodes, or in a single involved node, or the size of other lesions (e.g., splenic or hepatic nodules). To be considered PD, a lymph node with a diameter of the short axis of <1.0 cm must increase by ≥ 50% and to a size of 1.5 multiplied by 1.5 cm or more than 1.5 cm in the long axis; at least a 50% increase in the longest diameter of any single previously identified node >1 cm in its short axis.
Time Frame
Baseline until PD or death, whichever occurred first (up to 8.5 years overall))
Title
PFS as Assessed by Investigator
Description
PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the first occurrence of PD as assessed by an investigator according to the modified response criteria for iNHL (Modified Cheson et al, 2007), or death from any cause on study. PD was defined as appearance of any new lesion more than 1.5 cm in any axis during or at the end of therapy, even if other lesions are decreasing in size; at least a 50% increase from nadir in the SPD of any previously involved nodes, or in a single involved node, or the size of other lesions (e.g., splenic or hepatic nodules). To be considered PD, a lymph node with a diameter of the short axis of <1.0 cm must increase by ≥ 50% and to a size of 1.5 multiplied by 1.5 cm or more than 1.5 cm in the long axis; at least a 50% increase in the longest diameter of any single previously identified node >1 cm in its short axis. PFS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method and 95% CI for median was computed using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley.
Time Frame
Baseline until PD or death, whichever occurred first (up to 8.5 years overall)
Title
Percentage of Participants With Objective Response as Assessed by IRC
Description
Objective response was defined as having CR or PR as assessed according to the modified response criteria for iNHL (Modified Cheson et al, 2007). CR: Complete disappearance of all detectable clinical evidence of disease and disease-related symptoms if present prior to therapy, liver and spleen have returned to normal size (if enlarged at baseline), If the bone marrow was involved by lymphoma prior to treatment, the infiltrate must have cleared on repeat bone marrow biopsy. PR: at least 50% regression of measurable disease compared to tumors measured by a baseline scan and no new sites; no increase in the size of the other nodes, liver, or spleen; with the exception of splenic and hepatic nodules, involvement of other organs is usually assessable and no measurable disease should be present. IRC review was performed up clinical cutoff date of to 1 May 2015.
Time Frame
Baseline until PD or death, whichever occurred first (up to approximately 5 years)
Title
Percentage of Participants With Objective Response as Assessed by Investigator
Description
Objective response was defined as having CR or PR as assessed according to the modified response criteria for iNHL (Modified Cheson et al, 2007). CR: Complete disappearance of all detectable clinical evidence of disease and disease-related symptoms if present prior to therapy, liver and spleen have returned to normal size (if enlarged at baseline), If the bone marrow was involved by lymphoma prior to treatment, the infiltrate must have cleared on repeat bone marrow biopsy. PR: at least 50% regression of measurable disease compared to tumors measured by a baseline scan and no new sites; no increase in the size of the other nodes, liver, or spleen; with the exception of splenic and hepatic nodules, involvement of other organs is usually assessable and no measurable disease should be present.
Time Frame
Baseline until PD or death, whichever occurred first (up to approximately 8.5 years)
Title
Percentage of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) as Assessed by IRC
Description
BOR observed during assessment period according to modified response criteria for iNHL (Modified Cheson et al, 2007). CR: complete disappearance of all detectable clinical evidence of disease & disease-related symptoms if present prior to therapy, PR: at least 50% regression of measurable disease compared to tumors measured by baseline scan & no new sites; no increase in size of other nodes, liver, or spleen; with exception of splenic & hepatic nodules, involvement of other organs is usually assessable & no measurable disease should be present, SD: Failing to attain criteria needed for a CR/PR, but not fulfilling those for PD, PD: appearance of any new lesion >1.5 cm in any axis during or at end of therapy, even if other lesions are decreasing in size; at least a 50% increase from nadir in SPD of any previously involved nodes, or in single involved node, or size of other lesions (e.g., splenic or hepatic nodules). IRC review was performed up clinical cutoff date of to 1 May 2015.
Time Frame
Baseline until PD or death, whichever occurred first (up to approximately 5 years)
Title
Percentage of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) as Assessed by Investigator
Description
BOR: best response for a participant, observed during assessment period according to modified response criteria for iNHL (Modified Cheson et al, 2007). CR: complete disappearance of all detectable clinical evidence of disease and disease-related symptoms if present prior to therapy, PR: at least 50% regression of measurable disease compared to tumors measured by baseline scan and no new sites; no increase in size of other nodes, liver, or spleen; with exception of splenic and hepatic nodules, involvement of other organs is usually assessable and no measurable disease should be present, SD: Failing to attain the criteria needed for a CR or PR, but not fulfilling those for PD, PD: appearance of any new lesion more than 1.5 cm in any axis during or at the end of therapy, even if other lesions are decreasing in size; at least a 50% increase from nadir in the SPD of any previously involved nodes, or in single involved node, or the size of other lesions (e.g., splenic or hepatic nodules).
Time Frame
Baseline until PD or death, whichever occurred first (up to approximately 8.5 years)
Title
Percentage of Participants With BOR at the End of Induction Treatment as Assessed by IRC
Description
BOR observed during assessment period according to modified response criteria for iNHL (Modified Cheson et al, 2007). CR: complete disappearance of all detectable clinical evidence of disease & disease-related symptoms if present prior to therapy, PR: at least 50% regression of measurable disease compared to tumors measured by a baseline scan & no new sites; no increase in size of other nodes, liver or spleen; with exception of splenic & hepatic nodules, involvement of other organs is usually assessable & no measurable disease should be present, SD: Failing to attain criteria needed for a CR/PR, but not fulfilling those for PD, PD: appearance of any new lesion >1.5 cm in any axis during or at end of therapy, even if other lesions are decreasing in size; at least a 50% increase from nadir in the SPD of any previously involved nodes, or in a single involved node, or size of other lesions (e.g., splenic/hepatic nodules). IRC review was performed up clinical cutoff date of to 1 May 2015.
Time Frame
Baseline until end of induction treatment (assessed at baseline, 14 days prior to Cy 4 Day 1 [1 Cy=28days], 28-42 days after Cy 6 Day 1)
Title
Percentage of Participants With BOR at the End of Induction Treatment as Assessed by Investigator
Description
BOR: best response for a participant, observed during assessment period according to modified response criteria for iNHL (Modified Cheson et al, 2007). CR: complete disappearance of all detectable clinical evidence of disease and disease-related symptoms if present prior to therapy, PR: at least 50% regression of measurable disease compared to tumors measured by a baseline scan and no new sites; no increase in size of other nodes, liver, or spleen; with exception of splenic and hepatic nodules, involvement of other organs is usually assessable and no measurable disease should be present, SD: Failing to attain criteria needed for a CR or PR, but not fulfilling those for PD, PD: appearance of any new lesion more than 1.5 cm in any axis during or at the end of therapy, even if other lesions are decreasing in size; at least a 50% increase from nadir in the SPD of any previously involved nodes, or in a single involved node, or the size of other lesions (e.g., splenic or hepatic nodules).
Time Frame
Baseline until end of induction treatment (assessed at baseline, 14 days prior to Cy 4 Day 1 [1 Cy=28days], 28-42 days after Cy 6 Day 1)
Title
Percentage of Participants With Objective Response at the End of Induction Treatment as Assessed by IRC
Description
Objective response was defined as having CR or PR as assessed according to the modified response criteria for iNHL (Modified Cheson et al, 2007). CR: Complete disappearance of all detectable clinical evidence of disease and disease-related symptoms if present prior to therapy, liver and spleen have returned to normal size (if enlarged at baseline), If the bone marrow was involved by lymphoma prior to treatment, the infiltrate must have cleared on repeat bone marrow biopsy. PR: at least 50% regression of measurable disease compared to tumors measured by a baseline scan and no new sites; no increase in the size of the other nodes, liver, or spleen; with the exception of splenic and hepatic nodules, involvement of other organs is usually assessable and no measurable disease should be present. IRC review was performed up clinical cutoff date of to 1 May 2015.
Time Frame
Baseline until end of induction treatment (assessed at baseline, 14 days prior to Cy 4 Day 1 [1 Cy=28days], 28-42 days after Cy 6 Day 1)
Title
Percentage of Participants With Objective Response at the End of Induction Treatment as Assessed by Investigator
Description
Objective response was defined as having CR or PR as assessed according to the modified response criteria for iNHL (Modified Cheson et al, 2007). CR: Complete disappearance of all detectable clinical evidence of disease and disease-related symptoms if present prior to therapy, liver and spleen have returned to normal size (if enlarged at baseline), If the bone marrow was involved by lymphoma prior to treatment, the infiltrate must have cleared on repeat bone marrow biopsy. PR: at least 50% regression of measurable disease compared to tumors measured by a baseline scan and no new sites; no increase in the size of the other nodes, liver, or spleen; with the exception of splenic and hepatic nodules, involvement of other organs is usually assessable and no measurable disease should be present.
Time Frame
Baseline until end of induction treatment (assessed at baseline, 14 days prior to Cy 4 Day 1 [1 Cy=28days], 28-42 days after Cy 6 Day 1)
Title
Duration of Response (DoR) as Assessed by IRC
Description
DoR: time from first objective response of CR/PR to first occurrence of PD/relapse/death from any cause. CR: Complete disappearance of all detectable evidence of disease & disease-related symptoms if present before therapy; liver, spleen returned to normal size; if bone marrow involved by lymphoma before treatment, infiltrate must be cleared on repeat bone marrow biopsy. PR: at least 50% measurable disease regressed vs. to baseline scan and no new sites; no increase in size of other nodes/liver/spleen, exception: splenic, hepatic nodules; other organs involved is usually assessable; no measurable disease present. PD: any new lesion >1.5 cm in any axis appear during or at end of therapy, even if other lesions are decreasing in size; at least 50% increase from nadir in SPD of any previously involved nodes, or in single involved node, or size of other lesions. DoR estimated using Kaplan-Meier method. IRC review performed up to clinical cutoff date 1 May 2015.
Time Frame
Baseline until PD or death, whichever occurred first (up to approximately 5 years)
Title
Duration of Response (DoR) as Assessed by Investigator
Description
DoR: time from first objective response of CR/PR to first occurrence of PD/relapse/death from any cause. CR: Complete disappearance of all detectable clinical evidence of disease and disease-related symptoms if present prior to therapy; liver, spleen returned to normal size (if enlarged at baseline); if bone marrow was involved by lymphoma prior to treatment, infiltrate must have cleared on repeat bone marrow biopsy. PR: at least 50% regression of measurable disease compared to baseline scan and no new sites; no increase in size of other nodes, liver, or spleen; with exception of splenic, hepatic nodules; involvement of other organs is usually assessable; no presence of measurable disease. PD: appearance of any new lesion >1.5 cm in any axis during or at end of therapy, even if other lesions are decreasing in size; at least 50% increase from nadir in SPD of any previously involved nodes, or in single involved node, or size of other lesions. DoR was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method.
Time Frame
Baseline until PD or death, whichever occurred first (up to approximately 8.5 years)
Title
Disease-Free Survival (DFS) in Participants With CR as Assessed by IRC
Description
DFS was defined as the time from the first occurrence of a documented CR until progression on the basis of the IRC assessments (as per modified response criteria for iNHL [Modified Cheson et al, 2007]) or death from any cause on study. CR: Complete disappearance of all detectable clinical evidence of disease and disease-related symptoms if present prior to therapy, liver and spleen have returned to normal size (if enlarged at baseline), If the bone marrow was involved by lymphoma prior to treatment, the infiltrate must have cleared on repeat bone marrow biopsy. PD: appearance of any new lesion >1.5 cm in any axis during or at end of therapy, even if other lesions are decreasing in size; at least a 50% increase from nadir in SPD of any previously involved nodes, or in a single involved node, or size of other lesions. DFS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method. IRC review was performed up clinical cutoff date of to 1 May 2015.
Time Frame
Baseline until PD or death, whichever occurred first (up to approximately 5 years)
Title
Disease-Free Survival (DFS) in Participants With CR as Assessed by Investigator
Description
DFS was defined as the time from the first occurrence of a documented CR until progression on the basis of the IRC assessments (as per modified response criteria for iNHL [Modified Cheson et al, 2007]) or death from any cause on study. CR: Complete disappearance of all detectable clinical evidence of disease and disease-related symptoms if present prior to therapy, liver and spleen have returned to normal size (if enlarged at baseline), If the bone marrow was involved by lymphoma prior to treatment, the infiltrate must have cleared on repeat bone marrow biopsy. PD: appearance of any new lesion >1.5 cm in any axis during or at end of therapy, even if other lesions are decreasing in size; at least a 50% increase from nadir in SPD of any previously involved nodes, or in a single involved node, or size of other lesions. DFS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method.
Time Frame
Baseline until PD or death, whichever occurred first (up to approximately 8.5 years)
Title
Event-free Survival (EFS) as Assessed by IRC
Description
EFS was defined as the time between the date of randomization and the date of PD/relapse based on IRC assessments (as per modified response criteria for iNHL [Modified Cheson et al, 2007]), death from any cause on study, or start of a new anti-lymphoma therapy. PD: appearance of any new lesion >1.5 cm in any axis during or at end of therapy, even if other lesions are decreasing in size; at least a 50% increase from nadir in SPD of any previously involved nodes, or in a single involved node, or size of other lesions. EFS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method. IRC review was performed up clinical cutoff date of to 1 May 2015.
Time Frame
Baseline until PD or death, whichever occurred first (up to approximately 5 years)
Title
Percentage of Participants Who Died
Time Frame
Baseline until death (up to 8.5 years overall)
Title
Overall Survival (OS)
Description
OS was defined as the time between the date of randomization and the date of death from any cause. OS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method and 95% CI for median was computed using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley.
Time Frame
Baseline until death (up to 8.5 years overall)
Title
Change From Baseline (CFB) in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lymphoma (FACT-Lym)-Physical Well Being Sub-scale Score
Description
The FACT-Lym measures 5 sub-scales which includes 42 items; responses to each item range from 0, "Not at all" to 4, "Very much". Total score ranges from 0-168. Physical Well-being sub-scale includes 7 items measured on 0-4 point scale. The total score for physical well-being sub-scale is sum of each 7 items (range: 0-28). Higher scores indicate a better participant-reported outcome (PRO)/quality of life (QoL). In timeframe, follow-up months represents months after end of induction (e.g. Follow-up Month 2 is 2 months after end of induction) and extension follow-up months represents months after end of 2 years normal follow-up (e.g. extension follow-up Month 6 is 6 months after end of normal 2 year follow-up).
Time Frame
Baseline, Day 1 of Cycles 3, 4, 5, End of induction treatment (up to Month 6); Follow-up Months 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, Final Follow-up (up to 2 years after end of induction); Extension follow-up Months 6, 18 and 24
Title
CFB in FACT-Lym-Social/Family Well-being Sub-scale Score
Description
The FACT-Lym measures 5 sub-scales which includes 42 items; responses to each item range from 0, "Not at all" to 4, "Very much". Total score ranges from 0-168. Social/family Well-being sub-scale includes 7 items measured on 0-4 point scale. The total score for social/family well-being sub-scale is sum of each 7 items (range: 0-28). Higher scores indicate a better PRO/QoL. In timeframe, follow-up months represents months after end of induction (e.g. Follow-up Month 2 is 2 months after end of induction) and extension follow-up months represents months after end of 2 years normal follow-up (e.g. extension follow-up Month 6 is 6 months after end of normal 2 year follow-up).
Time Frame
Baseline, Day 1 of Cycles 3, 4, 5, End of induction treatment (up to Month 6); Follow-up Months 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, Final Follow-up (up to 2 years after end of induction); Extension follow-up Months 6, 18 and 24
Title
CFB in FACT-Lym-Emotional Well-Being Sub-scale Score
Description
The FACT-Lym measures 5 sub-scales which includes 42 items; responses to each item range from 0, "Not at all" to 4, "Very much". Total score ranges from 0-168. Emotional Well-being sub-scale includes 6 items measured on 0-4 point scale. The total score for emotional well-being sub-scale is sum of each 6 items (range: 0-24). Higher scores indicate a better PRO/QoL. In timeframe, follow-up months represents months after end of induction (e.g. Follow-up Month 2 is 2 months after end of induction) and extension follow-up months represents months after end of 2 years normal follow-up (e.g. extension follow-up Month 6 is 6 months after end of normal 2 year follow-up).
Time Frame
Baseline, Day 1 of Cycles 3, 4, 5, End of induction treatment (up to Month 6); Follow-up Months 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, Final Follow-up (up to 2 years after end of induction); Extension follow-up Months 6, 18 and 24
Title
CFB in FACT-Lym-Functional Well-Being Sub-scale Score
Description
The FACT-Lym measures 5 sub-scales which includes 42 items; responses to each item range from 0, "Not at all" to 4, "Very much". Total score ranges from 0-168. Functional Well-being sub-scale includes 7 items measured on 0-4 point scale. The total score for functional well-being sub-scale is sum of each 7 items (range: 0-28). Higher scores indicate a better PRO/QoL. In timeframe, follow-up months represents months after end of induction (e.g. Follow-up Month 2 is 2 months after end of induction) and extension follow-up months represents months after end of 2 years normal follow-up (e.g. extension follow-up Month 6 is 6 months after end of normal 2 year follow-up).
Time Frame
Baseline, Day 1 of Cycles 3, 4, 5, End of induction treatment (up to Month 6); Follow-up Months 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, Final Follow-up (up to 2 years after end of induction); Extension follow-up Months 6, 18 and 24
Title
CFB in FACT-Lym-Lymphoma Sub-scale Score
Description
The FACT-Lym measures 5 sub-scales which includes 42 items; responses to each item range from 0, "Not at all" to 4, "Very much". Total score ranges from 0-168. Lymphoma scale includes 15 items measured on 0-4 point scale. The total score for lymphoma sub-scale is sum of each 15 items (range: 0-60). Higher scores indicate a better PRO/QoL. In timeframe, follow-up months represents months after end of induction (e.g. Follow-up Month 2 is 2 months after end of induction) and extension follow-up months represents months after end of 2 years normal follow-up (e.g. extension follow-up Month 6 is 6 months after end of normal 2 year follow-up).
Time Frame
Baseline, Day 1 of Cycles 3, 4, 5, End of induction treatment (up to Month 6); Follow-up Months 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, Final Follow-up (up to 2 years after end of induction); Extension follow-up Months 6, 18 and 24
Title
CFB in Euro Quality of Life 5 Dimension (EuroQoL-5D/EQ-5D) - Health State Profile Utility Score During Induction Phase
Description
EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in terms of a single utility score. Health State Profile component assesses level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression; 1 indicates better health state (no problems); 3 indicates worst health state ("confined to bed"). Scoring formula developed by EuroQoL Group assigns a utility value for each domain in the profile. Score is transformed and results in a total score range -0.594 to 1.000; higher score indicates a better health state. In timeframe, follow-up months represents months after end of induction (e.g. Follow-up Month 2 is 2 months after end of induction). For 'Obinutuzumab + Bendamustine' arm, participants who had their follow-up Month 2 and 4 visits before start of maintenance treatment were reported in induction phase results under "CFB at Follow-up Month 2" and "CFB at Follow-up Month 4" categories.
Time Frame
Baseline, Day 1 of Cycles 3, 4, 5, End of induction treatment (up to Month 6); Follow-up Months 2, 4 and 14
Title
CFB in EuroQol 5D (EQ-5D) - Health State Profile Utility Score During Maintenance Phase
Description
EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in terms of a single utility score. Health State Profile component assesses level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression; 1 indicates better health state (no problems); 3 indicates worst health state ("confined to bed"). Scoring formula developed by EuroQoL Group assigns a utility value for each domain in the profile. Score is transformed and results in a total score range -0.594 to 1.000; higher score indicates a better health state. Data for this outcome was planned to be reported only for 'Obinutuzumab + Bendamustine' arm. In timeframe, follow-up months represents months after end of induction (e.g. Follow-up Month 2 is 2 months after end of induction). Follow-up months were during maintenance phase.
Time Frame
Baseline, Follow-up Months 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, Final follow-up (up to 2 years after end of induction) (End of induction = up to Month 6)
Title
CFB in EQ-5D Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score During Induction Phase
Description
EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in terms of a single index value. The VAS component rates current health state on a scale from 0 millimeter (mm) (worst imaginable health state) to 100 mm (best imaginable health state); higher scores indicate a better health state. In timeframe, follow-up months represents months after end of induction (e.g. Follow-up Month 2 is 2 months after end of induction). For 'Obinutuzumab + Bendamustine' arm, participants who had their follow-up Month 2 and 4 visits before start of maintenance treatment were reported in induction phase results under "CFB at Follow-up Month 2" and "CFB at Follow-up Month 4" categories.
Time Frame
Baseline, Day 1 of Cycles 3, 4, 5, End of induction treatment (up to Month 6); Follow-up Months 2, 4 and 14
Title
CFB in EQ-5D VAS Score During Maintenance Phase
Description
EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in terms of a single index value. The VAS component rates current health state on a scale from 0 mm (worst imaginable health state) to 100 mm (best imaginable health state); higher scores indicate a better health state. Data for this outcome was planned to be reported only for 'Obinutuzumab + Bendamustine' arm. In timeframe, follow-up months represents months after end of induction (e.g. Follow-up Month 2 is 2 months after end of induction). Follow-up months were during maintenance phase.
Time Frame
Baseline, Follow-up Months 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, Final Follow-up (up to 2 years after end of induction) (end of induction = up to Month 6)
Title
CFB in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Generic (FACT-G) Score
Description
The FACT-G is the sum of 4 sub-scales (physical, social, emotional and functional well-being) of FACT-Lym which includes total 27 items; responses to each item range from 0, "Not at all" to 4, "Very much". Total score ranges from 0-108. Higher scores indicate a better PRO/QoL. In timeframe, follow-up months represents months after end of induction (e.g. Follow-up Month 2 is 2 months after end of induction) and extension follow-up months represents months after end of 2 years normal follow-up (e.g. extension follow-up Month 6 is 6 months after end of normal 2 year follow-up).
Time Frame
Baseline, Day 1 of Cycles 3, 4, 5, End of induction treatment (up to Month 6); Follow-up Months 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, Final Follow-up (up to 2 years after end of induction); Extension follow-up Months 6, 18 and 24
Title
CFB in FACT-Lym Trial Outcome Index (TOI)
Description
TOI is the sum of 3 sub-scales (physical well-being, functional well-being, and Lymphoma sub-scale) of FACT-Lym which includes total 29 items; responses to each item range from 0, "Not at all" to 4, "Very much". Total score ranges from 0-116. Higher scores indicate a better PRO/QoL. In timeframe, follow-up months represents months after end of induction (e.g. Follow-up Month 2 is 2 months after end of induction) and extension follow-up months represents months after end of 2 years normal follow-up (e.g. extension follow-up Month 6 is 6 months after end of normal 2 year follow-up).
Time Frame
Baseline, Day 1 of Cycles 3, 4, 5, End of induction treatment (up to Month 6); Follow-up Months 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, Final Follow-up (up to 2 years after end of induction); Extension follow-up Months 6, 18 and 24
Title
CFB in FACT-Lym Total Score
Description
FACT-Lym total score is the sum of physical well-being score (7 items), social/family well-being (7 items), emotional well-being (6 items), functional well-being (7 items), and Lymphoma sub-scale (15 items); responses to each item range from 0, "Not at all" to 4, "Very much". Total score ranges from 0-168. Higher scores indicate a better PRO/QoL. In timeframe, follow-up months represents months after end of induction (e.g. Follow-up Month 2 is 2 months after end of induction) and extension follow-up months represents months after end of 2 years normal follow-up (e.g. extension follow-up Month 6 is 6 months after end of normal 2 year follow-up).
Time Frame
Baseline, Day 1 of Cycles 3, 4, 5, End of induction treatment (up to Month 6); Follow-up Months 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, Final Follow-up (up to 2 years after end of induction); Extension follow-up Months 6, 18 and 24
Title
Time to Deterioration of FACT-Lym TOI
Description
The median time, in month, from date of randomization until a clinically meaningful decline from baseline in TOI or death, whichever occurred first. TOI: sum of physical well-being score,functional well-being score, and Lymphoma sub-scale of FACT-Lym; total 29 items, responses to each item range from 0, "Not at all" to 4, "Very much". Total score ranges from 0-116. Higher scores indicate a better PRO/QoL. A clinically meaningful decline in TOI score was defined as at least a 6 point decline from baseline. Time to deterioration was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method and 95% CI for median was computed using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley. In timeframe, follow-up months represents months after end of induction (EOI) (e.g. Follow-up Month 2 is 2 months after end of induction) and extension follow-up months represents months after end of 2 years normal follow-up (e.g. extension follow-up Month 6 is 6 months after end of normal 2 year follow-up).
Time Frame
Baseline up to approximately 8.5 years
Title
Percentage of Participants With Definitive Improvement (DI) From Baseline in FACT-Lym Instrument Scores
Description
FACT-Lym: 42-items in 5 subscales. Responses to each item range from 0 (Not at all) to 4 (Very much). FACT-Lym Lymphoma subscale includes 15 items (total score range = 0-60). FACT-Lym TOI is sum of 3 subscales (physical well-being, functional well-being, lymphoma subscale) and includes 29 items (total score range = 0-116). FACT-Lym total score is sum of 42 items (total score ranges from 0-168). For all above, higher scores indicate a better PRO/QoL. DI from baseline: at least 3 point increase from baseline in FACT-Lym Lymphoma subscale; at least 6 point increase from baseline in FACT Lym TOI; at least 7 point increase from baseline in FACT Lym total scores. In timeframe, follow-up months represents months after EOI (e.g. Follow-up Month 2 is 2 months after EOI; EOI = up to Month 6).
Time Frame
Baseline, Cycle 5 Day 1 (C5D1) (Cycle length = 28 days), Follow-up Months 6 (FUM6), 12 (FUM12), 18 (FUM18), 24 (FUM24), Extension Follow Up Month 6 (Extension FUM6)

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: History of histologically documented, B-lymphocyte antigen cluster of differentiation 20 plus (CD20+), iNHL Refractory to any previous regimen containing rituximab (defined by participants who did not respond or who progressed during or up to 6 months after treatment with rituximab or a rituximab-containing regimen) Previously treated with a maximum of four unique chemotherapy containing treatment regimens All participants must have at least one bi-dimensionally measurable lesion (greater than [>]1.5 centimeters (cm) in its largest dimension by computed tomography [CT] scan) Exclusion Criteria: Prior use of any monoclonal antibody (other than anti-CD20) within 3 months prior to the start of Cycle 1, prior treatment with obinutuzumab was not allowed Chemotherapy or other investigational therapy within 28 days prior to the start of Cycle 1 Prior treatment with bendamustine (within 2 years of the start of Cycle 1) Prior allogeneic stem cell transplant History of severe allergic or anaphylactic reactions to monoclonal antibody therapy History of sensitivity to mannitol Central nervous system lymphoma or prior diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), histological evidence of transformation to high grade or diffuse large B-cell lymphoma History of other malignancy that could affect compliance with the protocol or interpretation of results Evidence of significant, uncontrolled concomitant diseases that could affect compliance with the protocol or interpretation of results Known active bacterial, viral, fungal, mycobacterial, parasitic, or other infection (excluding fungal infections of nail beds) or any major episode of infection requiring treatment with intravenous antibiotics or hospitalization within 4 weeks Participants with a history of confirmed progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) Vaccination with a live vaccine a minimum of 28 days prior to randomization Recent major surgery (within 4 weeks), other than for diagnosis Presence of positive test results for Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg); antibody to hepatitis B core antigen [anti-HBc]) with detectable viral load (positive hepatitis B virus [HBV] deoxyribo-nucleic acid [DNA]) or Hepatitis C Participants with chronic hepatitis B or seropositive occult (HBV) infection Participants with seronegative occult HBV infection or past HBV infection (defined as anti-HBc positive and HBV DNA negative) could be eligible if they were willing to be followed according to the protocol for HBV DNA testing Participants positive for Hepatitis C virus (HCV) antibody were eligible only if polymerase chain reaction(PCR) was negative for HCV Ribonucleic acid (RNA) Known history of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) seropositive status Positive test results for human T-lymphotropic virus type I (HTLV 1) virus in endemic countries Women who are pregnant or lactating Fertile men or women of childbearing potential unless 1) surgically sterile or 2) using an adequate measure of contraception such as oral contraceptives, intrauterine device, or barrier method of contraception in conjunction with spermicidal jelly Ongoing corticosteroid use >30 milligrams per day (mg/day) prednisone or equivalent
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Clinical Trials
Organizational Affiliation
Genentech, Inc.
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Southern Cancer Center, PC
City
Mobile
State/Province
Alabama
ZIP/Postal Code
36608
Country
United States
Facility Name
Dr. Donald W. Hill, MD, FACP
City
Casa Grande
State/Province
Arizona
ZIP/Postal Code
85122
Country
United States
Facility Name
Highlands Oncology Group
City
Rogers
State/Province
Arkansas
ZIP/Postal Code
72758
Country
United States
Facility Name
Kaiser Permanente - Bellflower
City
Bellflower
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
90706
Country
United States
Facility Name
Bay Area Cancer Research Group, LLC
City
Pleasant Hill
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
94523
Country
United States
Facility Name
Sharp Memorial Hospital
City
San Diego
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92123
Country
United States
Facility Name
Georgetown University Medical Center Lombardi Cancer Center
City
Washington
State/Province
District of Columbia
ZIP/Postal Code
20007
Country
United States
Facility Name
Washington DC VA Med Center; Hematology
City
Washington
State/Province
District of Columbia
ZIP/Postal Code
20422
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Florida
City
Gainesville
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
32607
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Florida; Division of Hematology/Oncology
City
Gainesville
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33610-0277
Country
United States
Facility Name
Md Anderson Cancer Center Orlando
City
Orlando
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
32806
Country
United States
Facility Name
Rush Cancer Institute
City
Chicago
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60612
Country
United States
Facility Name
Quincy Medical Group
City
Quincy
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
62301
Country
United States
Facility Name
Simmons Cancer Institute
City
Springfield
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
62794-9677
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Iowa
City
Iowa City
State/Province
Iowa
ZIP/Postal Code
52242
Country
United States
Facility Name
Univ Louisville School of Med
City
Louisville
State/Province
Kentucky
ZIP/Postal Code
40202
Country
United States
Facility Name
New England Cancer Specialists
City
Scarborough
State/Province
Maine
ZIP/Postal Code
04074
Country
United States
Facility Name
Meritus Center for Clinical Research
City
Hagerstown
State/Province
Maryland
ZIP/Postal Code
21740
Country
United States
Facility Name
Capitol Comprehensive CA Care
City
Jefferson City
State/Province
Missouri
ZIP/Postal Code
65101
Country
United States
Facility Name
Hackensack University Medical Center
City
Hackensack
State/Province
New Jersey
ZIP/Postal Code
07601
Country
United States
Facility Name
Hematology Oncology Assoc SJ
City
Mount Holly
State/Province
New Jersey
ZIP/Postal Code
08060
Country
United States
Facility Name
San Juan Oncology
City
Farmington
State/Province
New Mexico
ZIP/Postal Code
87401
Country
United States
Facility Name
The Mark H. Zangmeister Ctr; Mid Ohio Onc/Hem Inc.
City
Columbus
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
43219
Country
United States
Facility Name
OHSU Knight Cancer Institute
City
Portland
State/Province
Oregon
ZIP/Postal Code
97210
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pacific Oncology, PC
City
Portland
State/Province
Oregon
ZIP/Postal Code
97210
Country
United States
Facility Name
OHSU Ctr for Health & Healing
City
Portland
State/Province
Oregon
ZIP/Postal Code
97239
Country
United States
Facility Name
Thomas Jefferson University Hospital
City
Philadelphia
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
19107
Country
United States
Facility Name
Western Pennsylvania Hospital
City
Pittsburgh
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
15224
Country
United States
Facility Name
Sanford Health System
City
Sioux Falls
State/Province
South Dakota
ZIP/Postal Code
57105
Country
United States
Facility Name
South Texas Inst of Cancer
City
Corpus Christi
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
78405
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
City
Houston
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
77030
Country
United States
Facility Name
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
City
Seattle
State/Province
Washington
ZIP/Postal Code
98109
Country
United States
Facility Name
Univ of Wisconsin Hosp & Clin
City
Madison
State/Province
Wisconsin
ZIP/Postal Code
53792
Country
United States
Facility Name
Lkh-Univ. Klinikum Graz
City
Graz
ZIP/Postal Code
8036
Country
Austria
Facility Name
Lkh Salzburg - Univ. Klinikum Salzburg; Iii. Medizinische Abt.
City
Salzburg
ZIP/Postal Code
5020
Country
Austria
Facility Name
Medizinische Universität Wien
City
Wien
ZIP/Postal Code
1090
Country
Austria
Facility Name
ZNA Stuivenberg
City
Antwerpen
ZIP/Postal Code
2060
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
AZ Groeninge
City
Kortrijk
ZIP/Postal Code
8500
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
CHU Ambroise Paré
City
Mons
ZIP/Postal Code
7000
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
Cross Cancer Institute
City
Edmonton
State/Province
Alberta
ZIP/Postal Code
T6G 1Z2
Country
Canada
Facility Name
British Columbia Cancer Agency
City
Kelowna
State/Province
British Columbia
ZIP/Postal Code
V1Y 5L3
Country
Canada
Facility Name
British Columbia Cancer Agency
City
Vancouver
State/Province
British Columbia
ZIP/Postal Code
V5Z 1H6
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Manitoba Cancer Care
City
Winnipeg
State/Province
Manitoba
ZIP/Postal Code
R3E 0V9
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Moncton Hospital
City
Moncton
State/Province
New Brunswick
ZIP/Postal Code
E1C 6Z8
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Toronto East General Hospital; Main Pharmacy G Wing Basement
City
East York
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
M4C 3E7
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Princess Margaret Hospital
City
Toronto
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
M4X 1K9
Country
Canada
Facility Name
CHUM-Hosp Notre Dame
City
Montreal
State/Province
Quebec
ZIP/Postal Code
H2X 3E4
Country
Canada
Facility Name
McGill University; Sir Mortimer B Davis Jewish General Hospital; Oncology
City
Montreal
State/Province
Quebec
ZIP/Postal Code
H3T 1E2
Country
Canada
Facility Name
CHA Hopital de I enfant-Jesus
City
Quebec City
State/Province
Quebec
ZIP/Postal Code
G1J 1Z4
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Allan Blair Cancer Centre
City
Regina
State/Province
Saskatchewan
ZIP/Postal Code
S4T 7T1
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Fakultni nemocnice Brno; Interni hematologicka a onkologicka klinika
City
Brno
ZIP/Postal Code
625 00
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
Fakultni nemocnice Hradec Kralove
City
Hradec Kralove
ZIP/Postal Code
500 05
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
I Interni klinika; Vseobecna fakultni nemocnice
City
Prague 2
ZIP/Postal Code
128 08
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
Institut Bergonie; Hematologie Oncologie
City
Bordeaux
ZIP/Postal Code
33076
Country
France
Facility Name
Polyclinique Bordeaux Nord
City
Bordeaux
ZIP/Postal Code
33300
Country
France
Facility Name
Hopital Henri Mondor
City
Creteil
ZIP/Postal Code
94010
Country
France
Facility Name
CH Dijon
City
Dijon
ZIP/Postal Code
21079
Country
France
Facility Name
Centre d'oncologie-radiotherap
City
LeMans
ZIP/Postal Code
72015
Country
France
Facility Name
Hopital Claude Huriez
City
Lille
ZIP/Postal Code
59037
Country
France
Facility Name
Centre Leon Berard
City
Lyon
ZIP/Postal Code
69008
Country
France
Facility Name
Hopital Bon Secour
City
Metz
ZIP/Postal Code
57038
Country
France
Facility Name
CHU Hopital Saint Eloi
City
Montpellier
ZIP/Postal Code
34295
Country
France
Facility Name
Hopital Hotel Dieu Et Hme; Clinique Dermatologique
City
Nantes
ZIP/Postal Code
44093
Country
France
Facility Name
Hopital Necker
City
Paris
ZIP/Postal Code
75015
Country
France
Facility Name
Hopital Saint Louis; Dermatologie 1
City
Paris
ZIP/Postal Code
75475
Country
France
Facility Name
CHU Bordeaux
City
Pessac
ZIP/Postal Code
33604
Country
France
Facility Name
Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud; Hematolgie
City
Pierre Benite
ZIP/Postal Code
69495
Country
France
Facility Name
Chu De Poitiers; Chu La Miletrie
City
Poitiers
ZIP/Postal Code
86021
Country
France
Facility Name
CHU de Reims
City
Reims
ZIP/Postal Code
51100
Country
France
Facility Name
Hopital Pontchaillou
City
Rennes
ZIP/Postal Code
35033
Country
France
Facility Name
Centre Henri Becquerel
City
Rouen
ZIP/Postal Code
76038
Country
France
Facility Name
Clinique Ste Anne
City
Strasbourg
ZIP/Postal Code
67000
Country
France
Facility Name
CHRU de; Maladies, Vasculaires
City
Vandoeuvre
ZIP/Postal Code
54511
Country
France
Facility Name
St. Johannes Hospital Duisburg
City
Duisburg
ZIP/Postal Code
47166
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Klinikum Frankfurt Höchst
City
Frankfurt am Main
ZIP/Postal Code
65929
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Asklepios Klinik St. Georg
City
Hamburg
ZIP/Postal Code
20099
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Universitaetsklinikum Leipzig
City
Leipzig
ZIP/Postal Code
04103
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Klinikum der Universitat Munchen, Campus Grobhadern;; Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik III
City
München
ZIP/Postal Code
81377
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Schwarzwald-Baar Klinikum GmbH
City
Villingen-Schwenningen
ZIP/Postal Code
78052
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria di Modena
City
Modena
State/Province
Emilia-Romagna
ZIP/Postal Code
41100
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Azienda Ospedaliera Univ, Ematologica
City
Udine
State/Province
Friuli-Venezia Giulia
ZIP/Postal Code
33100
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Azienda Ospedaliera Univ
City
Roma
State/Province
Lazio
ZIP/Postal Code
00133
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Universita La Sapienza
City
Roma
State/Province
Lazio
ZIP/Postal Code
00161
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Irccs Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori (Int);S.C. Medicina Oncologica 2
City
Milano
State/Province
Lombardia
ZIP/Postal Code
20133
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Irccs Policlinico San Matteo; Divisione Di Ematologia
City
Pavia
State/Province
Lombardia
ZIP/Postal Code
27100
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Azienda Ospedale San Giovanni
City
Torino
State/Province
Piemonte
ZIP/Postal Code
10126
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Ospedale Mauriziano Umberto I
City
Torino
State/Province
Piemonte
ZIP/Postal Code
10128
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Ospedale Vito Fazzi
City
Lecce
State/Province
Puglia
ZIP/Postal Code
73100
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Azienda Ospedaliero Univ
City
Catania
State/Province
Sicilia
ZIP/Postal Code
95124
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Azienda Ospedaliera Univ
City
Firenze
State/Province
Toscana
ZIP/Postal Code
50141
Country
Italy
Facility Name
VU MEDISCH CENTRUM; Dept. of Medical Oncology
City
Amsterdam
ZIP/Postal Code
1081 HV
Country
Netherlands
Facility Name
Haga Ziekenhuis
City
Den Haag
ZIP/Postal Code
2504 LN
Country
Netherlands
Facility Name
Albert Schweitzer Ziekenhuis
City
Dordrecht
ZIP/Postal Code
3371 NM
Country
Netherlands
Facility Name
Universitair Medisch Centrum Groningen
City
Groningen
ZIP/Postal Code
9713 GZ
Country
Netherlands
Facility Name
Erasmus Mc - Daniel Den Hoed Kliniek; Medical Oncology
City
Rotterdam
ZIP/Postal Code
3015 CE
Country
Netherlands
Facility Name
Erasmus MC
City
Rotterdam
ZIP/Postal Code
3015 GD
Country
Netherlands
Facility Name
Regional Oncology Hospital
City
Irkutsk
ZIP/Postal Code
664035
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Blokhin Cancer Research Center; Combined Treatment
City
Moscow
ZIP/Postal Code
115478
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
City Clin Hosp n.a. S.P.Botkin
City
Moscow
ZIP/Postal Code
125101
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Russian Hema Res Ctr of RAMS
City
Moscow
ZIP/Postal Code
125167
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Republican Clinical Hospital n.a. Baranov; Haematology
City
Petrozavodsk
ZIP/Postal Code
185019
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Ryazan Regional Clinical Hosp
City
Ryazan
ZIP/Postal Code
390039
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
St. Petersburg State Medical University n.a. I.P. Pavlov; Hematology, transfusiology and transplanta
City
Saint-Petersburg
ZIP/Postal Code
197022
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
SRI of Hematology and Transfusiology
City
St. Petersburg
ZIP/Postal Code
191024
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Clinica Universitaria de Navarra
City
Pamplona
State/Province
Navarra
ZIP/Postal Code
31008
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Hospital Univ. Nuestra Señora de Valme;
City
Sevillac
State/Province
Sevilla
ZIP/Postal Code
41014
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Hospital Universitario Basurto
City
Bilbao
State/Province
Vizcaya
ZIP/Postal Code
48013
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Hospital Universitario de la Princesa; Servicio de Hematologia
City
Madrid
ZIP/Postal Code
28006
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Hospital Universitario La Paz
City
Madrid
ZIP/Postal Code
28034
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Skånes University Hospital, Skånes Department of Onclology
City
Lund
ZIP/Postal Code
22185
Country
Sweden
Facility Name
Hematology Center; Karolinska Univ Hosp
City
Stockholm
ZIP/Postal Code
14186
Country
Sweden
Facility Name
Norrlands Uni Hospital; Onkologi Avd.
City
Umeå
ZIP/Postal Code
901 85
Country
Sweden
Facility Name
Onc Clin, Akademiska Sjukhuset
City
Uppsala
ZIP/Postal Code
751 85
Country
Sweden
Facility Name
Universitaetsspital Basel; Onkologie
City
Basel
ZIP/Postal Code
4031
Country
Switzerland
Facility Name
Inselspital Bern; Universitätsklinik für medizinische Onkologie
City
Bern
ZIP/Postal Code
3010
Country
Switzerland
Facility Name
Kantonsspital Graubünden;Onkologie und Hämatologie
City
Chur
ZIP/Postal Code
7000
Country
Switzerland
Facility Name
Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre
City
Glasgow
ZIP/Postal Code
G12 0YN
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Leicester Royal Infirmary
City
Leicester
ZIP/Postal Code
LE1 5WW
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Barts & London School of Med; Medical Oncology
City
London
ZIP/Postal Code
EC1A 7BE
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Freeman Hospital
City
Newcastle upon Tyne
ZIP/Postal Code
NE7 7DN
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Singleton Hospital; Pharmacy Department
City
Swansea
ZIP/Postal Code
SA2 8QA
Country
United Kingdom

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
31462735
Citation
Pott C, Sehn LH, Belada D, Gribben J, Hoster E, Kahl B, Kehden B, Nicolas-Virelizier E, Spielewoy N, Fingerle-Rowson G, Harbron C, Mundt K, Wassner-Fritsch E, Cheson BD. MRD response in relapsed/refractory FL after obinutuzumab plus bendamustine or bendamustine alone in the GADOLIN trial. Leukemia. 2020 Feb;34(2):522-532. doi: 10.1038/s41375-019-0559-9. Epub 2019 Aug 28.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
31050355
Citation
Gibiansky E, Gibiansky L, Buchheit V, Frey N, Brewster M, Fingerle-Rowson G, Jamois C. Pharmacokinetics, exposure, efficacy and safety of obinutuzumab in rituximab-refractory follicular lymphoma patients in the GADOLIN phase III study. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2019 Sep;85(9):1935-1945. doi: 10.1111/bcp.13974. Epub 2019 Jul 12.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
29584548
Citation
Cheson BD, Chua N, Mayer J, Dueck G, Trneny M, Bouabdallah K, Fowler N, Delwail V, Press O, Salles G, Gribben JG, Lennard A, Lugtenburg PJ, Fingerle-Rowson G, Mattiello F, Knapp A, Sehn LH. Overall Survival Benefit in Patients With Rituximab-Refractory Indolent Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Who Received Obinutuzumab Plus Bendamustine Induction and Obinutuzumab Maintenance in the GADOLIN Study. J Clin Oncol. 2018 Aug 1;36(22):2259-2266. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.76.3656. Epub 2018 Mar 27.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
27345636
Citation
Sehn LH, Chua N, Mayer J, Dueck G, Trneny M, Bouabdallah K, Fowler N, Delwail V, Press O, Salles G, Gribben J, Lennard A, Lugtenburg PJ, Dimier N, Wassner-Fritsch E, Fingerle-Rowson G, Cheson BD. Obinutuzumab plus bendamustine versus bendamustine monotherapy in patients with rituximab-refractory indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma (GADOLIN): a randomised, controlled, open-label, multicentre, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016 Aug;17(8):1081-1093. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30097-3. Epub 2016 Jun 23.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

A Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of Bendamustine Compared With Bendamustine+Obinutuzumab (GA101) in Participants With Rituximab-Refractory, Indolent Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (GADOLIN)

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs