search
Back to results

Tools for Improving Colorectal Cancer Screening Rates: Multimedia Versus Print

Primary Purpose

Colorectal Cancer

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Multimedia Education
Print Media
Usual and customary waiting room process
Sponsored by
Trinity Health Of New England
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional prevention trial for Colorectal Cancer focused on measuring colorectal cancer screening, multimedia education, print education, culturally competent

Eligibility Criteria

50 Years - 80 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 50-80 years of age,
  • Registered for an appointment at one of the target clinics,
  • Speaks English or Spanish.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient has had CRC screening in the past 12 months,
  • Unable to review the study materials because of language, physical condition or literacy.

Sites / Locations

  • Midlakes Medical Building
  • North Chicago Health Center
  • Belvidere Medical Building

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm Type

Experimental

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Multimedia educational tool

Print educational tool

No intervention

Arm Description

Multimedia education tool - A culturally competent video explaining the importance of and the process of colorectal cancer screening

Print media - A culturally competent printed brochure explaining the importance of and the process of colorectal cancer screening

Usual and customary waiting room process - Usual and customary office waiting period with access to standard nationally generated colorectal cancer screening informational material in the waiting room and/or exam room.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Comparison of the acceptance of colorectal cancer screening by patients who view print or multimedia educational tools

Secondary Outcome Measures

Role of race/ethnicity and literacy levels on the comparative effects if the intervention
Comparative knowledge of colorectal cancer screening by patients who view the print or multi-media educational tools.

Full Information

First Posted
February 18, 2010
Last Updated
September 6, 2012
Sponsor
Trinity Health Of New England
Collaborators
American Cancer Society, Inc., Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01072851
Brief Title
Tools for Improving Colorectal Cancer Screening Rates: Multimedia Versus Print
Official Title
Tools for Improving Colorectal Cancer Screening Rates: Multimedia vs Print
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
September 2012
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
July 2008 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
July 2012 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
September 2012 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Trinity Health Of New England
Collaborators
American Cancer Society, Inc., Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The objective of this study is to compare the effectiveness of multimedia and print tools designed to provide patients at safety-net clinics with comprehensible information about colorectal cancer screening and motivate them to complete screening.The print and multimedia interventions were constructed with parallel content to allow valid comparison of format-related effects on knowledge and screening rates.These easy to use tools will provide under served patients at community health centers with clear and consistent messages about colorectal Cancer(CRC) and CRC screening, delivered immediately before the patients see a doctor. Specific Aims To determine if multimedia and print interventions that provide patients with information and motivational messages about CRC screening increase screening rates above usual care. Determine whether showing patients a multimedia program achieves higher CRC screening rates than does a print booklet with equivalent messages. Examine if the effects of these multimedia and print interventions on CRC screening rates differ with literacy level. Examine if the effects of these multimedia and print interventions on CRC screening differ with race/ethnicity Examine if these multimedia and print interventions have differential effects on knowledge relevant to CRC screening.
Detailed Description
Despite the clear benefits of screening for early detection and prevention of colorectal cancer, as many as half of eligible adults remain unscreened. Poor and under served populations, particularly African American and Latino/Hispanic adults, are at greatest risk for noncompliance with recommended tests. Health education strategies developed to date have led to relatively minimal gains, resulting in little translation to routine clinical practice. This is especially true in more difficult, resource-strained practice settings, such as community health centers. The interventions in the proposed study draw on communication science to optimize message design, use communication technology to optimize message delivery and include parallel content in both print and multimedia versions to allow comparison of format-related effects on both knowledge and screening rates.The multimedia and print tools are based on patient education programs that we developed with extensive attention to theory as well as community member input.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Colorectal Cancer
Keywords
colorectal cancer screening, multimedia education, print education, culturally competent

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Prevention
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantCare Provider
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
920 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Multimedia educational tool
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Multimedia education tool - A culturally competent video explaining the importance of and the process of colorectal cancer screening
Arm Title
Print educational tool
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Print media - A culturally competent printed brochure explaining the importance of and the process of colorectal cancer screening
Arm Title
No intervention
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Usual and customary waiting room process - Usual and customary office waiting period with access to standard nationally generated colorectal cancer screening informational material in the waiting room and/or exam room.
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Multimedia Education
Other Intervention Name(s)
colon cancer, communication, patient education
Intervention Description
A four minute exposure to an educational video with controlled content on the importance of colorectal cancer screening and explaining the processes and procedures.
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Print Media
Other Intervention Name(s)
colon cancer, communication, education
Intervention Description
Exposure to a printed brochure with controlled content on the importance of colorectal cancer screening and explaining the processes and procedures.
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Usual and customary waiting room process
Other Intervention Name(s)
colon cancer, communitcation, education
Intervention Description
No specialized educational intervention to promote colorectal cancer screening or to explain the process
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Comparison of the acceptance of colorectal cancer screening by patients who view print or multimedia educational tools
Time Frame
3 months post visit
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Role of race/ethnicity and literacy levels on the comparative effects if the intervention
Time Frame
At scheduled appointment
Title
Comparative knowledge of colorectal cancer screening by patients who view the print or multi-media educational tools.
Time Frame
At the scheduled patient visit

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
50 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
80 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: 50-80 years of age, Registered for an appointment at one of the target clinics, Speaks English or Spanish. Exclusion Criteria: Patient has had CRC screening in the past 12 months, Unable to review the study materials because of language, physical condition or literacy.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Gregory Makoul, PHD
Organizational Affiliation
St. Francis Hospital and Medical Center
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Midlakes Medical Building
City
Highland Park
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60085
Country
United States
Facility Name
North Chicago Health Center
City
North Chicago
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60064
Country
United States
Facility Name
Belvidere Medical Building
City
Waukegan
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60085
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

Tools for Improving Colorectal Cancer Screening Rates: Multimedia Versus Print

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs