search
Back to results

Multicenter Study to Rule Out Myocardial Infarction by Cardiac Computed Tomography (ROMICAT-II)

Primary Purpose

Acute Coronary Syndrome, Myocardial Infarction, Unstable Angina Pectoris

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Cardiac Computed Tomography
Sponsored by
Massachusetts General Hospital
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional diagnostic trial for Acute Coronary Syndrome focused on measuring acute chest pain, emergency department, cardiac computed tomography

Eligibility Criteria

40 Years - 75 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Participant had at least five minutes of chest pain or equivalent (chest tightness; pain radiating to left, right, or both arms or shoulders, back, neck, epigastrium, jaw/throat; or unexplained shortness of breath, syncope/presyncope, generalized weakness, nausea, or vomiting thought to be of cardiac origin) at rest or during exercise within 24 hours of ED presentation, warranting further risk stratification, as determined by an ED attending.
  2. 2 or more cardiac risk factors (diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, current smoker and family history of coronary artery disease).
  3. Able to provide a written informed consent.
  4. <75 years of age, but >40 years of age.
  5. Able to hold breath for at least 10 seconds.
  6. Sinus rhythm.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. New diagnostic ischemic ECG changes (ST-segment elevation or depression > 1 mm or T-wave inversion > 4 mm) in more than two anatomically adjacent leads or left bundle branch block
  2. Documented or self-reported history of CAD (MI, percutaneous coronary interventions [PCIs], coronary artery bypass graft [CABG], known significant coronary stenosis [>50%])
  3. Greater than 6 hours since presentation to ED.
  4. BMI >40 kg/m2
  5. Impaired renal function as defined by serum creatinine >1.5 mg/dL*
  6. Elevated troponin-T (> 0.09 ng/ml)
  7. Hemodynamically or clinically unstable condition (BP systolic < 80 mm Hg, atrial or ventricular arrhythmias, persistent chest pain despite adequate therapy)
  8. Known allergy to iodinated contrast agent
  9. Currently symptomatic asthma
  10. Documented or self-reported cocaine use within the past 48 hours (acute)
  11. On Metformin therapy and unable or unwilling to discontinue for 48 hours after the CT scan
  12. Contraindication to beta blockers (taking daily antiasthmatic medication): This exclusion only applies to patients with a heart rate >65 bpm at sites using a non-dual source CT scanner
  13. Participant with no telephone or cell phone numbers or no address (preventing follow-up)
  14. Participant with positive pregnancy test. Women of childbearing potential, defined as <2 years of menopause in the absence of hysterectomy or tube ligation, must have a pregnancy test performed within 24 hours before the CT scan.
  15. Participant unwilling to provide a written informed consent.

Sites / Locations

  • Massachusetts General Hospital

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

No Intervention

Experimental

Arm Label

Standard of care

Cardiac CT

Arm Description

Subjects in this arm (50% of the total cohort) continued to receive standard non-invasive evaluation of acute chest pain symptoms in the emergency department - mostly comprising of, but not limited to - exercise treadmill test, stress test with imaging and stress echocardiography.

Subjects in this arm (50% of the total cohort) were randomized to receive a cardiac computed tomography scan as part of the initial evaluation of acute chest pain symptoms, upon presentation to the emergency department.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Length of Hospital Stay

Secondary Outcome Measures

Time to Diagnosis
Healthcare Utilization
Number of patients with diagnostic testing (CCTA, ETT, SPECT, stress echocardiography, and invasive coronary angiography)
MACE
Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events, All though these events are called MACE they do not qualify as adverse or serious adverse events. As these events are expected in some individuals in this population. Only MACE that occured within 72 hours after hospital discharge were considered serious adverse events in this trial. There were no such events.
Cost-effectiveness
Total cost during index hospitalization
Rate of ED Discharge
Direct discharge from Emergency Department

Full Information

First Posted
January 7, 2010
Last Updated
April 8, 2014
Sponsor
Massachusetts General Hospital
Collaborators
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI), Kaiser Permanente, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Bay State Clinical Trials, Inc., Washington University School of Medicine, Tufts Medical Center, The Cleveland Clinic, Northwestern University, University of Maryland
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01084239
Brief Title
Multicenter Study to Rule Out Myocardial Infarction by Cardiac Computed Tomography
Acronym
ROMICAT-II
Official Title
Rule Out Myocardial Ischemia/Infarction by Computer Assisted Tomography
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
April 2014
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
April 2010 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
January 2012 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
March 2012 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Massachusetts General Hospital
Collaborators
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI), Kaiser Permanente, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Bay State Clinical Trials, Inc., Washington University School of Medicine, Tufts Medical Center, The Cleveland Clinic, Northwestern University, University of Maryland

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The growing availability of cardiac computed tomography (CT)* in emergency departments (EDs) across the U.S. expands the opportunities for its clinical application, but also heightens the need to define its appropriate use in the evaluation of patients with acute chest pain. To address this need, we performed a randomized diagnostic trial (RDT) to determine whether integrating cardiac CT, along with the information it provides on coronary artery disease (CAD) and left ventricular (LV) function, can improve the efficiency of the management of these patients (i.e. shorten length of hospital stay, increase direct discharge rates from the ED, decreasing healthcare costs and improving cost effectiveness while being safe).
Detailed Description
Patients with acute chest pain and normal or non-diagnostic electrocardiograms (ECGs) represent a cohort whose management is notably inefficient and diagnostically challenging. Because in less than 30% of EDs diagnostic testing (e.g. nuclear imaging, echocardiography, and exercise treadmill ECG) that would allow physicians to rule out the occurrence of myocardial ischemia is performed as part of the initial evaluation, most of these patients are hospitalized for 24 to 36 hours to exclude the presence of acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Of the six million acute chest pain patients admitted each year in the U.S. under these conditions, less than 10% of them ultimately receive a diagnosis of ACS at discharge. Moreover, inpatient care for negative evaluations imparts an economic burden in excess of $8 billion annually. Since acute myocardial ischemia and necrosis are rare in the absence of coronary artery disease, a technology that reliably identifies CAD may allow physicians to discharge chest pain patients directly from the ED. Cardiac CT is a safe, high-speed, noninvasive imaging technique that accurately detects coronary atherosclerotic plaque and stenosis, and also allows physicians to assess global and regional LV function. Observational studies have demonstrated that approximately 40% of acute chest pain patients have no evidence of atherosclerosis on cardiac CT, and that an additional 30% have no evidence of hemodynamically significant (>50%) coronary artery stenosis. Both of these criteria are powerful predictors of the absence of both ACS and major adverse cardiovascular events (negative predictive value [NPV] of 98%). The specificity of cardiac CT is further increased when global and regional LV function is normal. Several studies have demonstrated that cardiac CT, with its high NPV, can be effectively used to rule out ACS, but little is known about the willingness ability of ED physicians to use this information to augment patient management. We therefore performed a trial at 9 clinical sites and randomized 1000 patients with acute chest pain and normal or non-diagnostic ECGs, to receive either standard ED evaluation (no intervention) or a cardiac CT (experimental) in the evaluation of acute chest pain in the emergency room. (Rule Out Myocardial Infarction using Computer Assisted Computed Tomography [ROMICAT II]).

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Acute Coronary Syndrome, Myocardial Infarction, Unstable Angina Pectoris
Keywords
acute chest pain, emergency department, cardiac computed tomography

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Diagnostic
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
1000 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Standard of care
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
Subjects in this arm (50% of the total cohort) continued to receive standard non-invasive evaluation of acute chest pain symptoms in the emergency department - mostly comprising of, but not limited to - exercise treadmill test, stress test with imaging and stress echocardiography.
Arm Title
Cardiac CT
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Subjects in this arm (50% of the total cohort) were randomized to receive a cardiac computed tomography scan as part of the initial evaluation of acute chest pain symptoms, upon presentation to the emergency department.
Intervention Type
Radiation
Intervention Name(s)
Cardiac Computed Tomography
Intervention Description
A contrast enhanced cardiac CT was performed in addition to standard evaluation. Reconstructed data sets were evaluated for the presence of coronary artery calcium, coronary atherosclerotic plaque and stenosis, LV function and incidental findings.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Length of Hospital Stay
Time Frame
Duration of stay in the hospital during the initial visit
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Time to Diagnosis
Time Frame
Time from ED arrival to first positive test (all tests except Echocardiography Rest and including troponins ) if discharge diagnosis is ACS, otherwise time to performance of last test (all tests except Echocardiography Rest and including troponins ).
Title
Healthcare Utilization
Description
Number of patients with diagnostic testing (CCTA, ETT, SPECT, stress echocardiography, and invasive coronary angiography)
Time Frame
Duration of stay in the hospital during the initial visit
Title
MACE
Description
Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events, All though these events are called MACE they do not qualify as adverse or serious adverse events. As these events are expected in some individuals in this population. Only MACE that occured within 72 hours after hospital discharge were considered serious adverse events in this trial. There were no such events.
Time Frame
72 hours after discharge up to 28 days after enrollment.
Title
Cost-effectiveness
Description
Total cost during index hospitalization
Time Frame
Duration of stay in the hospital during the initial visit
Title
Rate of ED Discharge
Description
Direct discharge from Emergency Department
Time Frame
Duration of stay in the hospital during the initial visit

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
40 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
75 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Participant had at least five minutes of chest pain or equivalent (chest tightness; pain radiating to left, right, or both arms or shoulders, back, neck, epigastrium, jaw/throat; or unexplained shortness of breath, syncope/presyncope, generalized weakness, nausea, or vomiting thought to be of cardiac origin) at rest or during exercise within 24 hours of ED presentation, warranting further risk stratification, as determined by an ED attending. 2 or more cardiac risk factors (diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, current smoker and family history of coronary artery disease). Able to provide a written informed consent. <75 years of age, but >40 years of age. Able to hold breath for at least 10 seconds. Sinus rhythm. Exclusion Criteria: New diagnostic ischemic ECG changes (ST-segment elevation or depression > 1 mm or T-wave inversion > 4 mm) in more than two anatomically adjacent leads or left bundle branch block Documented or self-reported history of CAD (MI, percutaneous coronary interventions [PCIs], coronary artery bypass graft [CABG], known significant coronary stenosis [>50%]) Greater than 6 hours since presentation to ED. BMI >40 kg/m2 Impaired renal function as defined by serum creatinine >1.5 mg/dL* Elevated troponin-T (> 0.09 ng/ml) Hemodynamically or clinically unstable condition (BP systolic < 80 mm Hg, atrial or ventricular arrhythmias, persistent chest pain despite adequate therapy) Known allergy to iodinated contrast agent Currently symptomatic asthma Documented or self-reported cocaine use within the past 48 hours (acute) On Metformin therapy and unable or unwilling to discontinue for 48 hours after the CT scan Contraindication to beta blockers (taking daily antiasthmatic medication): This exclusion only applies to patients with a heart rate >65 bpm at sites using a non-dual source CT scanner Participant with no telephone or cell phone numbers or no address (preventing follow-up) Participant with positive pregnancy test. Women of childbearing potential, defined as <2 years of menopause in the absence of hysterectomy or tube ligation, must have a pregnancy test performed within 24 hours before the CT scan. Participant unwilling to provide a written informed consent.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Udo Hoffmann, MD, MPH
Organizational Affiliation
Massachusetts General Hospital
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Massachusetts General Hospital
City
Boston
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
02114
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
33766254
Citation
Karady J, Mayrhofer T, Ferencik M, Nagurney JT, Udelson JE, Kammerlander AA, Fleg JL, Peacock WF, Januzzi JL Jr, Koenig W, Hoffmann U. Discordance of High-Sensitivity Troponin Assays in Patients With Suspected Acute Coronary Syndromes. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021 Mar 30;77(12):1487-1499. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.01.046.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
30405295
Citation
Reinhardt SW, Babatunde A, Novak E, Brown DL. Effect of Race on Outcomes Following Early Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography or Standard Emergency Department Evaluation for Acute Chest Pain. Ethn Dis. 2018 Oct 18;28(4):517-524. doi: 10.18865/ed.28.4.517. eCollection 2018 Fall.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
30354493
Citation
Bittner DO, Mayrhofer T, Puchner SB, Lu MT, Maurovich-Horvat P, Ghemigian K, Kitslaar PH, Broersen A, Bamberg F, Truong QA, Schlett CL, Hoffmann U, Ferencik M. Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography-Specific Definitions of High-Risk Plaque Features Improve Detection of Acute Coronary Syndrome. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018 Aug;11(8):e007657. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.118.007657.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
29138794
Citation
Reinhardt SW, Lin CJ, Novak E, Brown DL. Noninvasive Cardiac Testing vs Clinical Evaluation Alone in Acute Chest Pain: A Secondary Analysis of the ROMICAT-II Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Feb 1;178(2):212-219. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.7360.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
28923845
Citation
Ferencik M, Mayrhofer T, Lu MT, Woodard PK, Truong QA, Peacock WF, Bamberg F, Sun BC, Fleg JL, Nagurney JT, Udelson JE, Koenig W, Januzzi JL, Hoffmann U. High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin I as a Gatekeeper for Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography and Stress Testing in Patients with Acute Chest Pain. Clin Chem. 2017 Nov;63(11):1724-1733. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2017.275552. Epub 2017 Sep 18.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
28487318
Citation
Bittner DO, Mayrhofer T, Bamberg F, Hallett TR, Janjua S, Addison D, Nagurney JT, Udelson JE, Lu MT, Truong QA, Woodard PK, Hollander JE, Miller C, Chang AM, Singh H, Litt H, Hoffmann U, Ferencik M. Impact of Coronary Calcification on Clinical Management in Patients With Acute Chest Pain. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017 May;10(5):e005893. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.116.005893.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
27006119
Citation
Truong QA, Schulman-Marcus J, Zakroysky P, Chou ET, Nagurney JT, Fleg JL, Schoenfeld DA, Udelson JE, Hoffmann U, Woodard PK. Coronary CT Angiography Versus Standard Emergency Department Evaluation for Acute Chest Pain and Diabetic Patients: Is There Benefit With Early Coronary CT Angiography? Results of the Randomized Comparative Effectiveness ROMICAT II Trial. J Am Heart Assoc. 2016 Mar 22;5(3):e003137. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.115.003137.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
26762723
Citation
Pursnani A, Celeng C, Schlett CL, Mayrhofer T, Zakroysky P, Lee H, Ferencik M, Fleg JL, Bamberg F, Wiviott SD, Truong QA, Udelson JE, Nagurney JT, Hoffmann U. Use of Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography Findings to Modify Statin and Aspirin Prescription in Patients With Acute Chest Pain. Am J Cardiol. 2016 Feb 1;117(3):319-24. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.10.052. Epub 2015 Nov 18.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
26476506
Citation
Ferencik M, Liu T, Mayrhofer T, Puchner SB, Lu MT, Maurovich-Horvat P, Pope JH, Truong QA, Udelson JE, Peacock WF, White CS, Woodard PK, Fleg JL, Nagurney JT, Januzzi JL, Hoffmann U. hs-Troponin I Followed by CT Angiography Improves Acute Coronary Syndrome Risk Stratification Accuracy and Work-Up in Acute Chest Pain Patients: Results From ROMICAT II Trial. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015 Nov;8(11):1272-1281. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2015.06.016. Epub 2015 Oct 14.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
25819865
Citation
Januzzi JL, Sharma U, Zakroysky P, Truong QA, Woodard PK, Pope JH, Hauser T, Mayrhofer T, Nagurney JT, Schoenfeld D, Peacock WF, Fleg JL, Wiviott S, Pang PS, Udelson J, Hoffmann U. Sensitive troponin assays in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome: Results from the multicenter rule out myocardial infarction using computer assisted tomography II trial. Am Heart J. 2015 Apr;169(4):572-8.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2014.12.023. Epub 2015 Jan 9.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
25710925
Citation
Pursnani A, Chou ET, Zakroysky P, Deano RC, Mamuya WS, Woodard PK, Nagurney JT, Fleg JL, Lee H, Schoenfeld D, Udelson JE, Hoffmann U, Truong QA. Use of coronary artery calcium scanning beyond coronary computed tomographic angiography in the emergency department evaluation for acute chest pain: the ROMICAT II trial. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015 Mar;8(3):e002225. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.114.002225. Epub 2015 Feb 20.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
25125300
Citation
Puchner SB, Liu T, Mayrhofer T, Truong QA, Lee H, Fleg JL, Nagurney JT, Udelson JE, Hoffmann U, Ferencik M. High-risk plaque detected on coronary CT angiography predicts acute coronary syndromes independent of significant stenosis in acute chest pain: results from the ROMICAT-II trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Aug 19;64(7):684-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.05.039.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
23685743
Citation
Truong QA, Hayden D, Woodard PK, Kirby R, Chou ET, Nagurney JT, Wiviott SD, Fleg JL, Schoenfeld DA, Udelson JE, Hoffmann U. Sex differences in the effectiveness of early coronary computed tomographic angiography compared with standard emergency department evaluation for acute chest pain: the rule-out myocardial infarction with Computer-Assisted Tomography (ROMICAT)-II Trial. Circulation. 2013 Jun 25;127(25):2494-502. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.001736. Epub 2013 May 17.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
22830462
Citation
Hoffmann U, Truong QA, Schoenfeld DA, Chou ET, Woodard PK, Nagurney JT, Pope JH, Hauser TH, White CS, Weiner SG, Kalanjian S, Mullins ME, Mikati I, Peacock WF, Zakroysky P, Hayden D, Goehler A, Lee H, Gazelle GS, Wiviott SD, Fleg JL, Udelson JE; ROMICAT-II Investigators. Coronary CT angiography versus standard evaluation in acute chest pain. N Engl J Med. 2012 Jul 26;367(4):299-308. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1201161.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
22424002
Citation
Hoffmann U, Truong QA, Fleg JL, Goehler A, Gazelle S, Wiviott S, Lee H, Udelson JE, Schoenfeld D; ROMICAT II. Design of the Rule Out Myocardial Ischemia/Infarction Using Computer Assisted Tomography: a multicenter randomized comparative effectiveness trial of cardiac computed tomography versus alternative triage strategies in patients with acute chest pain in the emergency department. Am Heart J. 2012 Mar;163(3):330-8, 338.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2012.01.028. Epub 2012 Feb 22.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Multicenter Study to Rule Out Myocardial Infarction by Cardiac Computed Tomography

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs