Comparing Two Different Approaches in the Screening of Cystic Fibrosis Related Diabetes (CFRD)
Primary Purpose
Screening of Cystic Fibrosis Related Diabetes
Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United Kingdom
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Glucose profile for 2 weeks
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional screening trial for Screening of Cystic Fibrosis Related Diabetes focused on measuring Adults, Cystic Fibrosis Related Diabetes, Screening, Oral glucose tolerance test, Royal Brompton & Harefield Foundation Trust
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- first one hundred consecutive clinically stable patients with CF attending annual review from January 2009
- 16 years of age and over will be eligible for the study.
Exclusion Criteria:
- patients with an existing diagnosis of CFRD.
- patients with an infective exacerbation (i.e. on a new course of antibiotics)
Sites / Locations
- Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm Type
Other
Arm Label
CF patients without known diagnose of CFRD
Arm Description
There is only one arm. All patients in the study had the same procedures (ie. an OGTT). Investigators used the screening criteria in parallel to this.
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
To identify if using the selective approach to screen for CFRD is as accurate as screening all patients with OGTT at annual review.
Patients identified for OGTT based on the selective approach by the two independent reviewers will be compared.
Patients will form two groups:
i)those identified as needing OGTT, ii)those on whom they considered it unnecessary
The results of the two groups will then be compared with the data obtain from OGTT to which the two reviewers were 'blinded'
Secondary Outcome Measures
Which is the more cost effective way of screening all patients with OGTT?
Calculate the cost of glucose powder and laboratory analysis for each OGTT.
Compare the cost effectiveness of carrying out OGTT on patients identified by the selective approach with the cost of carrying out OGTT on all patients.
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT01091025
First Posted
March 18, 2010
Last Updated
December 20, 2017
Sponsor
Imperial College London
Collaborators
Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01091025
Brief Title
Comparing Two Different Approaches in the Screening of Cystic Fibrosis Related Diabetes
Acronym
CFRD
Official Title
A Comparative Analysis of the Clinical Efficacy of Two Approaches in the Screening for Cystic Fibrosis Related Diabetes in Adult With Cystic Fibrosis: i) a Selective Approach; ii) an Unselected Annual Oral Glucose Tolerance Test
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
March 2010
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
March 2009 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
December 2009 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
January 2010 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Imperial College London
Collaborators
Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The incidence of cystic fibrosis related diabetes (CFRD) has risen significantly as patients' survival improves. Early diagnosis of CFRD is crucial to prevent the unnecessary deterioration of lung function and nutritional status, both of which affect the patient's overall survival. The oral glucose tolerance test (OGGT) is the accepted method for detecting CFRD. The Cystic Fibrosis Trust guidelines (2004) recommend that patients with CF over the age of twelve years should be screened annually. Most hospitals use an annual OGTT. Performing OGTT on all CF patients is inconvenient and may not be cost effective, as patients have to starve overnight and need to spend an extra 2 hours in the hospital in addition to all the other annual review tests. In our centre, a selective approach is used. If patients have an abnormal random blood glucose and /or abnormal glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c) and/or symptoms of hyperglycaemia or unexplained weight loss then an OGTT will be performed.
The aims of this study are
To compare the clinical efficiency in the screening for CFRD in the two different methods: i)a selective approach , ii)an unselected annual OGTT for all patients.
To compare the cost effectiveness of the two approaches in the screening for CFRD.
Detailed Description
CFRD affects 30% of all patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) by the age of twenty-five. Early diagnosis of CFRD is crucial to prevent the unnecessary deterioration of pulmonary function and nutritional status, both of which affect the patient's overall survival. The selective approach takes less patient time and is less expensive. If it is equally accurate it should be used routinely. The oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) is the accepted method for detecting CFRD and the Cystic Fibrosis Trust guidelines recommend that patients with CF over the age of twelve years should be screened annually. Yung et al, questioned this approach and argued that performing OGTT on all CF patients is inconvenient and may not be cost effective, as patients have to starve overnight and need to spend an extra 2 hours in the hospital in addition to all the other annual review tests.
In this study, a selective approach in performing OGTTs in the screening for CFRD will be used; this includes the use of a combination of clinical and biochemical criteria that of abnormal random blood glucose and /or abnormal glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c) and/or symptoms of hyperglycaemia, or weight loss.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Screening of Cystic Fibrosis Related Diabetes
Keywords
Adults, Cystic Fibrosis Related Diabetes, Screening, Oral glucose tolerance test, Royal Brompton & Harefield Foundation Trust
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Screening
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
100 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
CF patients without known diagnose of CFRD
Arm Type
Other
Arm Description
There is only one arm. All patients in the study had the same procedures (ie. an OGTT). Investigators used the screening criteria in parallel to this.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Glucose profile for 2 weeks
Intervention Description
A study subject has an abnormal OGTT will be referred to a cystic fibrosis consultant who is not involved in the study.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
To identify if using the selective approach to screen for CFRD is as accurate as screening all patients with OGTT at annual review.
Description
Patients identified for OGTT based on the selective approach by the two independent reviewers will be compared.
Patients will form two groups:
i)those identified as needing OGTT, ii)those on whom they considered it unnecessary
The results of the two groups will then be compared with the data obtain from OGTT to which the two reviewers were 'blinded'
Time Frame
6 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Which is the more cost effective way of screening all patients with OGTT?
Description
Calculate the cost of glucose powder and laboratory analysis for each OGTT.
Compare the cost effectiveness of carrying out OGTT on patients identified by the selective approach with the cost of carrying out OGTT on all patients.
Time Frame
6 months
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
16 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
first one hundred consecutive clinically stable patients with CF attending annual review from January 2009
16 years of age and over will be eligible for the study.
Exclusion Criteria:
patients with an existing diagnosis of CFRD.
patients with an infective exacerbation (i.e. on a new course of antibiotics)
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Maragret E Hodson, Professor
Organizational Affiliation
Imperial College London
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust
City
London
ZIP/Postal Code
SW3 6NP
Country
United Kingdom
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Learn more about this trial
Comparing Two Different Approaches in the Screening of Cystic Fibrosis Related Diabetes
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs