search
Back to results

A Screening Strategy for Q Fever Among Pregnant Women

Primary Purpose

Q Fever

Status
Unknown status
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Netherlands
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
screening
Sponsored by
University Medical Center Groningen
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional screening trial for Q Fever focused on measuring Q fever, Pregnancy, Screening, Cost-effectiveness

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)FemaleAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • being pregnant under first line healthcare
  • being eighteen years or older
  • having signed an informed consent form
  • having a estimated date of delivery between June 1th 2010 en December 31th 2010

Exclusion Criteria:

  • unable to fulfill study procedures
  • absence of informed consent
  • have been tested positive for Q fever prior to pregnancy
  • unable to understand Dutch

Sites / Locations

  • University Medical Center GroningenRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

No Intervention

Arm Label

intervention

control

Arm Description

Screening for Q-fever during pregnancy

No screening for Q-fever during pregnancy

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

obstetric or maternal complications in Q fever positive women
Presence of any obstetric or maternal complication after the first trimester of pregnancy, i.e. spontaneous abortion, intrauterine fetal death, termination of pregnancy, oligohydramnios, premature delivery or intrauterine growth retardation. Spontaneous abortion is defined as spontaneous expulsion of the embryo or the fetus before 16 weeks of gestation. Oligohydramnios is defined as the ultrasonic measurement with an amniotic index <=5 cm. IUGR is defined as a fetal birth weight less than the 10th percentile for gestational age, according to the national reference curves.

Secondary Outcome Measures

course of infection in pregnant women
maternal chronic infection or reactivation
the accuracy of the diagnostic tests used for screening
the accuracy of the diagnostic tests used for screening (serology vs PCR)
placentitis
the extent to which the placenta has been infected
costs
The costs associated with health care consumption and other related costs among pregnant women.

Full Information

First Posted
March 29, 2010
Last Updated
June 30, 2010
Sponsor
University Medical Center Groningen
Collaborators
ZonMw: The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01095328
Brief Title
A Screening Strategy for Q Fever Among Pregnant Women
Official Title
Cost-effectiveness of a Screening Strategy for Q Fever Among Pregnant Women in Risk Areas: a Clustered Randomized Controlled Trial
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
February 2010
Overall Recruitment Status
Unknown status
Study Start Date
March 2010 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
February 2011 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
March 2011 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Name of the Sponsor
University Medical Center Groningen
Collaborators
ZonMw: The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Q fever in the Netherlands is becoming more common. A Q fever infection is a serious threat to certain risk groups,including pregnant women. Pregnant women are more often than the general population asymptomatic. Studies from France show that an infection with Coxiella burnetii may cause obstetric complications including spontaneous abortion, intrauterine fetal death, intrauterine growth retardation and oligohydramnios. The aim of this study is to assess the effectiveness and cost effectiveness of a multidisciplinary screening program, whereby pregnant women in first line healthcare in high-risk areas for Q fever are screened with a single blood sample during pregnancy. If found positive for Q fever, advise for antibiotic treatment will follow as part of regular healthcare. Treatment is therefore not part of the study protocol. The results of this study will give more insights in the risks of asymptomatic Q fever in pregnancy and the benefits and harms of a screening strategy during pregnancy. This study will be used to give an evidence based advice to the Dutch minister of health on screening for Q fever in pregnancy.
Detailed Description
We will conduct a clustered randomized controlled trial among pregnant women within an area of high transmission. The study participants will be recruited by the midwives in high risk areas, defined by postal code from the RIVM. To inform the public in this area about the study we will publish an article in local newspapers. The midwife centers will be randomized to recruit pregnant women for either the control group or the intervention group. The pregnant women will receive study information by mail using the midwives patients file. It is estimated that approximately 10,000 eligible women live in the areas of transmission. After written informed consent, they will start with the strategy for which the midwife center is randomized. Participants will be asked for a blood sample in their second trimester of pregnancy, possibly combined with the routine structural ultrasound around 20 weeks of pregnancy to minimize hospital visit. If participants are enrolled in their third trimester, they will have their blood sampling as soon as possible after inclusion. When taking part in the intervention group the sample will be tested immediately for Q fever. If found positive for acute or chronic Q fever, patients have to be referred, according to local protocol, to a hospital for further pregnancy monitoring and long-term bacteriostatic treatment. Follow-up blood samples are required at 14 days, 3, 6 and 12 months after the first blood sampling as part of the standardized control of Q fever disease to diagnose possible chronicity of infection. Furthermore, current routine for pregnant women being treated with antibiotics against Q fever is to perform monthly blood analyses to monitor treatment, and if the serological parameters descend, these controls are brought back to once every two months. According to local protocol patients with Q fever have to deliver in hospital. After pregnancy serology should be continued with check-ups at 3, 6 and 12 months following the current protocol. Furthermore, after delivery a bacteriocide treatment with doxycycline or an alternative will be started by the specialist as part of regular health care. In the control arm the blood samples will be stored, and analyzed for Q fever after delivery. If tested positive for Q fever after pregnancy antibiotics could be started if needed as part of regular health care. At baseline, a questionnaire will be administered to all participants asking about the current pregnancy , pregnancy outcome of any previous pregnancies and demographics. Further risk factors for pregnancy outcome will also be obtained such as smoking and drinking behavior, risk-elevating comorbidities and medication use. After delivery all relevant outcome data will be collected by questionnaires filled out by the midwife, GP or specialist after delivery, notably the presence of obstetric complications. One month after delivery or end of pregnancy, a last questionnaire will be administered to the participant to verify potential long-term consequences of Q fever, potential loss of income, health-related quality-of-life, fatigue and depressive symptoms. Furthermore questions will be asked about the condition of the newborn and risk-accessing questions for Q fever infection will be asked. In the context of the secondary research questions an extra blood sample will be required, and placentas as well as amniotic fluid will be collected after delivery. The latter will only take place in a limited number of women and only if they gave birth in a hospital. All participants will receive usual care and will be asked to visit the general practitioner if symptoms of Q fever occur. He/she will start diagnostic research and treatment or will refer the patient to the hospital. Furthermore, both arms have access to an expert team for support.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Q Fever
Keywords
Q fever, Pregnancy, Screening, Cost-effectiveness

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Screening
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
4000 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
intervention
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Screening for Q-fever during pregnancy
Arm Title
control
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
No screening for Q-fever during pregnancy
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
screening
Intervention Description
screening for Q-fever with a single blood sampling
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
obstetric or maternal complications in Q fever positive women
Description
Presence of any obstetric or maternal complication after the first trimester of pregnancy, i.e. spontaneous abortion, intrauterine fetal death, termination of pregnancy, oligohydramnios, premature delivery or intrauterine growth retardation. Spontaneous abortion is defined as spontaneous expulsion of the embryo or the fetus before 16 weeks of gestation. Oligohydramnios is defined as the ultrasonic measurement with an amniotic index <=5 cm. IUGR is defined as a fetal birth weight less than the 10th percentile for gestational age, according to the national reference curves.
Time Frame
obstetric complications till delivery, maternal till one month post partum
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
course of infection in pregnant women
Description
maternal chronic infection or reactivation
Time Frame
till one month post partum
Title
the accuracy of the diagnostic tests used for screening
Description
the accuracy of the diagnostic tests used for screening (serology vs PCR)
Time Frame
around 20 weeks of gestation
Title
placentitis
Description
the extent to which the placenta has been infected
Time Frame
one month post partum
Title
costs
Description
The costs associated with health care consumption and other related costs among pregnant women.
Time Frame
till one month post partum

10. Eligibility

Sex
Female
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: being pregnant under first line healthcare being eighteen years or older having signed an informed consent form having a estimated date of delivery between June 1th 2010 en December 31th 2010 Exclusion Criteria: unable to fulfill study procedures absence of informed consent have been tested positive for Q fever prior to pregnancy unable to understand Dutch
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Eelko Hak, Dr
Phone
+31 50 36 14616
Email
E.Hak@epi.umcg.nl
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Janna M Munster, MD, MSc
Phone
+31 626890978
Email
J.Munster@og.umcg.nl
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Eelko Hak, Dr.
Organizational Affiliation
University Medical Center Groningen
Official's Role
Study Director
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Janna Munster, MD, MSc
Organizational Affiliation
University Medical Center Groningen
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Wim van der Hoek, Drs.
Organizational Affiliation
Center for Infectious Disease Control
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Ronald Stolk, Prof. dr.
Organizational Affiliation
University Medical Center Groningen
Official's Role
Study Chair
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jan Aarnoudse, Prof. dr.
Organizational Affiliation
University Medical Center Groningen
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Sander Leenders, Dr.
Organizational Affiliation
Jeroen Bosch Hospital
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Bert Timmer, Dr.
Organizational Affiliation
University Medical Center Groningen
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University Medical Center Groningen
City
Groningen
ZIP/Postal Code
9700 RB
Country
Netherlands
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Janna Munster, MD, MSc
Phone
+31 626890978
Email
J.Munster@og.umcg.nl
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Eelko Hak, Dr.
Phone
+31 50 36 14616
Email
E.Hak@epi.umcg.nl

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
18452690
Citation
Hartzell JD, Wood-Morris RN, Martinez LJ, Trotta RF. Q fever: epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment. Mayo Clin Proc. 2008 May;83(5):574-9. doi: 10.4065/83.5.574.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17682987
Citation
Carcopino X, Raoult D, Bretelle F, Boubli L, Stein A. Managing Q fever during pregnancy: the benefits of long-term cotrimoxazole therapy. Clin Infect Dis. 2007 Sep 1;45(5):548-55. doi: 10.1086/520661. Epub 2007 Jul 17.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16503466
Citation
Parker NR, Barralet JH, Bell AM. Q fever. Lancet. 2006 Feb 25;367(9511):679-88. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68266-4.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
18761906
Citation
Schimmer B, Morroy G, Dijkstra F, Schneeberger PM, Weers-Pothoff G, Timen A, Wijkmans C, van der Hoek W. Large ongoing Q fever outbreak in the south of The Netherlands, 2008. Euro Surveill. 2008 Jul 31;13(31):18939. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17868551
Citation
Karagiannis I, Morroy G, Rietveld A, Horrevorts AM, Hamans M, Francken P, Schimmer B. Q fever outbreak in the Netherlands: a preliminary report. Euro Surveill. 2007 Aug 9;12(8):E070809.2. doi: 10.2807/esw.12.32.03247-en. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17953175
Citation
Van Steenbergen JE, Morroy G, Groot CA, Ruikes FG, Marcelis JH, Speelman P. [An outbreak of Q fever in The Netherlands--possible link to goats]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2007 Sep 8;151(36):1998-2003. Dutch.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
11368259
Citation
Jover-Diaz F, Robert-Gates J, Andreu-Gimenez L, Merino-Sanchez J. Q fever during pregnancy: an emerging cause of prematurity and abortion. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol. 2001;9(1):47-9. doi: 10.1155/S1064744901000084.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20003524
Citation
Lin JM, Brimmer DJ, Maloney EM, Nyarko E, Belue R, Reeves WC. Further validation of the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory in a US adult population sample. Popul Health Metr. 2009 Dec 15;7:18. doi: 10.1186/1478-7954-7-18.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
10515901
Citation
Maurin M, Raoult D. Q fever. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1999 Oct;12(4):518-53. doi: 10.1128/CMR.12.4.518.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
12861167
Citation
Langley JM, Marrie TJ, Leblanc JC, Almudevar A, Resch L, Raoult D. Coxiella burnetii seropositivity in parturient women is associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Jul;189(1):228-32. doi: 10.1067/mob.2003.448.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
11911725
Citation
Raoult D, Fenollar F, Stein A. Q fever during pregnancy: diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up. Arch Intern Med. 2002 Mar 25;162(6):701-4. doi: 10.1001/archinte.162.6.701.
Results Reference
background
Citation
Advice Dutch Health Council, http://www.gezondheidsraad.nl/nl/adviezen/briefadviesbijeenkomst- over-q-koorts-nederland
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
18448698
Citation
Vaidya VM, Malik SV, Kaur S, Kumar S, Barbuddhe SB. Comparison of PCR, immunofluorescence assay, and pathogen isolation for diagnosis of q fever in humans with spontaneous abortions. J Clin Microbiol. 2008 Jun;46(6):2038-44. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01874-07. Epub 2008 Apr 30.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16524773
Citation
Wagner-Wiening C, Brockmann S, Kimmig P. Serological diagnosis and follow-up of asymptomatic and acute Q fever infections. Int J Med Microbiol. 2006 May;296 Suppl 40:294-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmm.2006.01.045. Epub 2006 Mar 9.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
11709360
Citation
Gikas A, Kofteridis DP, Manios A, Pediaditis J, Tselentis Y. Newer macrolides as empiric treatment for acute Q fever infection. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2001 Dec;45(12):3644-6. doi: 10.1128/AAC.45.12.3644-3646.2001.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
9770161
Citation
Stein A, Raoult D. Q fever during pregnancy: a public health problem in southern France. Clin Infect Dis. 1998 Sep;27(3):592-6. doi: 10.1086/514698.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
18387140
Citation
McCaughey C, McKenna J, McKenna C, Coyle PV, O'Neill HJ, Wyatt DE, Smyth B, Murray LJ. Human seroprevalence to Coxiella burnetii (Q fever) in Northern Ireland. Zoonoses Public Health. 2008 May;55(4):189-94. doi: 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2008.01109.x.
Results Reference
background
Citation
Meekelenkamp JCE, Notermans DW, Rietveld A, Marcelis JH, Schimmer B, Reimerink JHJ, Vollebergh JHA, Wijkmans CJ, Leenders ACAP. Seroprevalence of Coxiella burnetii in pregnant women in the province of Noord-Brabant in 2007. Infectieziekten Bulletin, 20: 57-61 [in Dutch].
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
7496944
Citation
Dupont HT, Thirion X, Raoult D. Q fever serology: cutoff determination for microimmunofluorescence. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 1994 Mar;1(2):189-96. doi: 10.1128/cdli.1.2.189-196.1994.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23787163
Citation
Munster JM, Leenders AC, Hamilton CJ, Meekelenkamp JC, Schneeberger PM, van der Hoek W, Rietveld A, de Vries E, Stolk RP, Aarnoudse JG, Hak E. Routine screening for Coxiella burnetii infection during pregnancy: a clustered randomised controlled trial during an outbreak, the Netherlands, 2010. Euro Surveill. 2013 Jun 13;18(24):20504.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
21040534
Citation
Munster JM, Leenders AC, van der Hoek W, Schneeberger PM, Rietveld A, Riphagen-Dalhuisen J, Stolk RP, Hamilton CJ, de Vries E, Meekelenkamp J, Lo-Ten-Foe JR, Timmer A, De Jong-van den Berg LT, Aarnoudse JG, Hak E. Cost-effectiveness of a screening strategy for Q fever among pregnant women in risk areas: a clustered randomized controlled trial. BMC Womens Health. 2010 Nov 1;10:32. doi: 10.1186/1472-6874-10-32.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

A Screening Strategy for Q Fever Among Pregnant Women

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs