search
Back to results

Efficacy and Safety of Gadobutrol 1.0 Molar (Gadovist) for Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) (GEMMA 2)

Primary Purpose

Breast Cancer

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Gadobutrol (Gadavist, Gadovist, BAY86-4875)
Sponsored by
Bayer
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional diagnostic trial for Breast Cancer focused on measuring Breast Cancer, Gadobutrol-enhanced MRI, Mammography, Diagnostic Imaging

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Recent histologically proven diagnosis of breast cancer after having obtained X-Ray Mammography (XRM) of both breasts (according to American College of Radiology [ACR] and performed no longer than 6 weeks prior to enrollment into the study) and has been referred for a contrast-enhanced Magnetic Resonance Mammography (MRM) prior to surgery of the breast.
  • if female, a digital XRM is required if any of the following criteria is met:

    • a. patient is younger than 50 years;
    • b. patient has heterogeneously or extremely dense breasts;
    • c. is not post-menopausal (post-menopause defined as at least 12 months prior to inclusion without menstruation).
  • if female of childbearing potential, MRM should be performed on the 7-14th day of the menstrual cycle.
  • has an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) value >/= 60 mL/min/1.73m^2 derived from a serum creatinine result within 2 weeks prior to study enrollment.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • is a female patient who is pregnant or lactating
  • has any contraindication to the MRM examination (e.g. metal implants, phobia) or the use of gadolinium-containing contrast agents.
  • has received any contrast agent within 24 hours prior to the study MRM, or is scheduled to receive any contrast agent within 24 hours after the study MRM.
  • has severe cardiovascular disease (e.g., known long QT syndrome, acute myocardial infarction [< 14 days], unstable angina, congestive heart failure New York Heart Association class IV) or acute stroke (< 48 hours)).
  • has acute renal insufficiency of any severity due to hepato-renal syndrome or in the peri-operative liver transplantation period or who has acute or chronic moderate or severe renal insufficiency (glomerular filtration rate < 60 mL/min/1.73m^2).
  • has received chemotherapy or hormonal therapy for breast cancer within 6 months.
  • has received hormone replacement therapy within 4 weeks prior to study drug administration.
  • is scheduled or likely to require a surgery and/or biopsy in the time period up to 24 hours following study drug application
  • has prior excisional biopsy or breast surgery less than 6 months before enrollment and between XRM and study MRM

Sites / Locations

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm Type

Experimental

Arm Label

Gadobutrol (Gadavist, BAY86-4875)

Arm Description

Patients first received an unenhanced magnetic resonance mammography (MRM), followed by a gadobutrol-enhanced MRM. Gadobutrol was administered at the standard dose of 0.1 mmol/kg body weight (bw) [0.1 ml/kg bw] as an intravenous injection (i.v.) at a rate of 2 ml/sec. Unenhanced MRM (UMRM) and combined unenhanced and contrast (gadobutrol)-enhanced MRM (CMRM) image sets were evaluated in a randomized fashion. After the evaluation of the UMRM or CMRM the respective X-ray mammography (XRM) was added and evaluated together with the UMRM images.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Difference of Sensitivity for Detection of Full Extent of Malignant Breast Disease Using CMRM vs UMRM Per Reader
For a single participant the sensitivity was defined as the proportion of malignant breast regions that were recognized by the clinical investigators and the 3 blinded readers using the respective imaging modality as malignant. Subsequently the sensitivity percentage was calculated based on the mean of the sensitivities across all participants. The difference was calculated as CMRM value minus UMRM value. For ease of expression, the following abbreviations will be used: Magnetic Resonance Mammography (MRM), Unenhanced MRM (UMRM), combined unenhanced and contrast (gadobutrol)-enhanced MRM (CMRM), X-ray mammography (XRM).
Sensitivity for Detection of Full Extent of Malignant Breast Disease Using CMRM vs UMRM Per Reader
For a single participant the sensitivity was defined as the proportion of malignant breast regions that were recognized by the clinical investigators and the 3 blinded readers using the respective imaging modality as malignant. Subsequently the sensitivity percentage was calculated based on the mean of the sensitivities across all participants.
Breast Level Specificity of CMRM for Non-malignant Breasts by Reader
A non-malignant breast was defined as false positive (FP), when the reader assessed at least one breast region as malignant. When all breast regions were assessed as non-malignant, the breast was defined as true negative (TN). Breast level specificity was first defined in participant as number of TN-breasts in participant divided by number of non-malignant breasts in participant. Subsequently the specificity percentage was calculated based on the mean of the specificities across all participants who contributed with at least one non-malignant breast.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Breast Level Specificity of CMRM Based on Malignant Breasts
A malignant breast was defined as FP, when the reader using the respective imaging modality assessed more breast regions as malignant as were present according to SoT. Otherwise the breast was assessed as TN. Specificity was then defined as TN/(TN+FP).
Percentage Difference of Participants Whose Index Cancers Were Detected Using CMRM vs UMRM, CMRM vs XRM, and CMRM vs CMRM+XRM
Index cancer was defined as the cancer confirmed by histology prior to inclusion which made the participants eligible for the study. The difference in percentage of participants was calculated as CMRM value minus UMRM value, CMRM value minus XRM value, CMRM value minus CMRM+XRM value respectively.
Percentage Difference of Participants Whose Additional Index Cancers Were Detected Using CMRM vs UMRM, CMRM vs XRM, and CMRM vs CMRM+XRM
Additional cancer was defined as cancer which was present according to SoT, but which was not defined as index cancer, i.e. was not known when the participant was enrolled into the study. The difference in percentage of participants was calculated as CMRM value minus UMRM value, CMRM value minus XRM value, CMRM value minus CMRM+XRM value respectively.
Difference of Confidence in Diagnosis for Breast Region Diagnosis Using CMRM vs UMRM, CMRM+XRM vs UMRM+XRM and CMRM+XRM vs XRM by Reader, Participant Level
The investigator and the blinded readers each recorded his/her confidence in diagnosis for each breast region based on a 4-point scale (1 = not confident, 2 = somewhat confident, 3 = confident, and 4 = very confident). For each participant, the mean of the confidence responses for the diagnosed breast regions was calculated, and rounded to the nearest 0.5. The difference was calculated as CMRM value minus UMRM value, CMRM+XRM value minus UMRM+XRM value, CMRM+XRM value minus XRM value respectively.

Full Information

First Posted
April 14, 2010
Last Updated
November 10, 2014
Sponsor
Bayer
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01104584
Brief Title
Efficacy and Safety of Gadobutrol 1.0 Molar (Gadovist) for Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
Acronym
GEMMA 2
Official Title
An Open Label, Multi-center, Phase 3 Study With Corresponding Blinded Image Reading to Determine the Efficacy and Safety of a Single Intravenous Injection of 0.1 mmol/kg Body Weight of Gadobutrol 1.0 Molar (Gadovist®) in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer Referred for Contrast-enhanced Breast MRI
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
November 2014
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
May 2010 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
September 2011 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
January 2012 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Bayer

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to look at the efficacy (how does it work) and safety of gadobutrol when used for obtaining MR images of both breasts.Women with a recent diagnosis of breast cancer by mammogram (X-ray examination of the breasts) may benefit from MRI of the breasts as MRI may detect additional breast cancers

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Breast Cancer
Keywords
Breast Cancer, Gadobutrol-enhanced MRI, Mammography, Diagnostic Imaging

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Diagnostic
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
460 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Gadobutrol (Gadavist, BAY86-4875)
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Patients first received an unenhanced magnetic resonance mammography (MRM), followed by a gadobutrol-enhanced MRM. Gadobutrol was administered at the standard dose of 0.1 mmol/kg body weight (bw) [0.1 ml/kg bw] as an intravenous injection (i.v.) at a rate of 2 ml/sec. Unenhanced MRM (UMRM) and combined unenhanced and contrast (gadobutrol)-enhanced MRM (CMRM) image sets were evaluated in a randomized fashion. After the evaluation of the UMRM or CMRM the respective X-ray mammography (XRM) was added and evaluated together with the UMRM images.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Gadobutrol (Gadavist, Gadovist, BAY86-4875)
Intervention Description
A single bolus injection of gadobutrol 1.0 M; 0.1 mmol/kg body weight
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Difference of Sensitivity for Detection of Full Extent of Malignant Breast Disease Using CMRM vs UMRM Per Reader
Description
For a single participant the sensitivity was defined as the proportion of malignant breast regions that were recognized by the clinical investigators and the 3 blinded readers using the respective imaging modality as malignant. Subsequently the sensitivity percentage was calculated based on the mean of the sensitivities across all participants. The difference was calculated as CMRM value minus UMRM value. For ease of expression, the following abbreviations will be used: Magnetic Resonance Mammography (MRM), Unenhanced MRM (UMRM), combined unenhanced and contrast (gadobutrol)-enhanced MRM (CMRM), X-ray mammography (XRM).
Time Frame
Immediately before injection and after injection
Title
Sensitivity for Detection of Full Extent of Malignant Breast Disease Using CMRM vs UMRM Per Reader
Description
For a single participant the sensitivity was defined as the proportion of malignant breast regions that were recognized by the clinical investigators and the 3 blinded readers using the respective imaging modality as malignant. Subsequently the sensitivity percentage was calculated based on the mean of the sensitivities across all participants.
Time Frame
Immediately before injection and after injection
Title
Breast Level Specificity of CMRM for Non-malignant Breasts by Reader
Description
A non-malignant breast was defined as false positive (FP), when the reader assessed at least one breast region as malignant. When all breast regions were assessed as non-malignant, the breast was defined as true negative (TN). Breast level specificity was first defined in participant as number of TN-breasts in participant divided by number of non-malignant breasts in participant. Subsequently the specificity percentage was calculated based on the mean of the specificities across all participants who contributed with at least one non-malignant breast.
Time Frame
Immediately before injection and after injection
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Breast Level Specificity of CMRM Based on Malignant Breasts
Description
A malignant breast was defined as FP, when the reader using the respective imaging modality assessed more breast regions as malignant as were present according to SoT. Otherwise the breast was assessed as TN. Specificity was then defined as TN/(TN+FP).
Time Frame
Immediately before injection and after injection
Title
Percentage Difference of Participants Whose Index Cancers Were Detected Using CMRM vs UMRM, CMRM vs XRM, and CMRM vs CMRM+XRM
Description
Index cancer was defined as the cancer confirmed by histology prior to inclusion which made the participants eligible for the study. The difference in percentage of participants was calculated as CMRM value minus UMRM value, CMRM value minus XRM value, CMRM value minus CMRM+XRM value respectively.
Time Frame
Immediately before injection and after injection
Title
Percentage Difference of Participants Whose Additional Index Cancers Were Detected Using CMRM vs UMRM, CMRM vs XRM, and CMRM vs CMRM+XRM
Description
Additional cancer was defined as cancer which was present according to SoT, but which was not defined as index cancer, i.e. was not known when the participant was enrolled into the study. The difference in percentage of participants was calculated as CMRM value minus UMRM value, CMRM value minus XRM value, CMRM value minus CMRM+XRM value respectively.
Time Frame
Immediately before injection and after injection
Title
Difference of Confidence in Diagnosis for Breast Region Diagnosis Using CMRM vs UMRM, CMRM+XRM vs UMRM+XRM and CMRM+XRM vs XRM by Reader, Participant Level
Description
The investigator and the blinded readers each recorded his/her confidence in diagnosis for each breast region based on a 4-point scale (1 = not confident, 2 = somewhat confident, 3 = confident, and 4 = very confident). For each participant, the mean of the confidence responses for the diagnosed breast regions was calculated, and rounded to the nearest 0.5. The difference was calculated as CMRM value minus UMRM value, CMRM+XRM value minus UMRM+XRM value, CMRM+XRM value minus XRM value respectively.
Time Frame
Immediately before injection and after injection
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
Sensitivity for Detection of Full Extent of Malignant Breast Disease Using XRM, CMRM+XRM and UMRM+XRM Per Reader
Description
For a single participant the sensitivity was defined as the proportion of malignant breast regions that were recognized by the reader using the respective imaging modality as malignant. Subsequently the sensitivity percentage was calculated based on the mean of the sensitivities across all participants.
Time Frame
Immediately before injection and after injection
Title
Breast Level Specificity of in Non-malignant Breasts Using UMRM, XRM, CMRM+XRM and UMRM+XRM by Reader
Description
A non-malignant breast was defined as false positive (FP), when the reader assessed at least one breast region as malignant. When all breast regions were assessed as non-malignant, the breast was defined as true negative (TN). Breast level specificity was first defined in participant as number of TN-breasts in participant divided by number of non-malignant breasts in participant. Subsequently the specificity percentage was calculated based on the mean of the specificities across all participants who contributed with at least one non-malignant breast.
Time Frame
Immediately before injection and after injection
Title
Breast Level Specificity in Malignant Breasts Using UMRM, XRM, CMRM+XRM and UMRM+XRM by Reader
Description
A malignant breast was defined as FP, when the reader using the respective imaging modality assessed more breast regions as malignant as were present according to SoT. Otherwise the breast was assessed as TN. Specificity was then defined as TN/(TN+FP).
Time Frame
Immediately before injection and after injection
Title
Breast Level Specificity for All Breasts by Imaging Modality and by Reader
Description
A non-malignant breast was defined as FP when the reader assessed at least one breast region as malignant. A malignant breast was defined as FP, when the reader using the respective imaging modality assessed more breast regions as malignant as were present according to SoT. Otherwise the breast was assessed as TN. Specificity was then defined as (N-FP)/N, where N was total number of breasts.
Time Frame
Immediately before injection and after injection
Title
Sensitivity Difference in the Determination of Malignant Breast Disease Using CMRM vs UMRM, CMRM+XRM vs UMRM+XRM, and CMRM+XRM vs XRM Verified by SoT, Breast Region Level
Description
For a single participant the sensitivity was defined as the proportion of malignant breast regions that were recognized by the reader using the respective imaging modality as malignant. Subsequently the point estimates were calculated based on the mean of the sensitivities across all participants. Regions with malignant disease verified by SoT comprise unifocal and multifocal regions. Difference in sensitivity is calculated as CMRM value minus UMRM value, CMRM+XRM value minus UMRM+XRM value, CMRM+XRM value minus XRM value respectively.
Time Frame
Immediately before injection and after injection
Title
Sensitivity Difference in the Determination of Unifocal Malignant Breast Disease Using CMRM vs UMRM, CMRM+XRM vs UMRM+XRM, and CMRM+XRM vs XRM Verified by SoT, Breast Region Level
Description
For a single participant the sensitivity was defined as the proportion of malignant breast regions that were recognized by the reader using the respective imaging modality as malignant. Subsequently the point estimates were calculated based on the mean of the sensitivities across all participants. The difference in sensitivity is calculated as CMRM value minus UMRM value, CMRM+XRM value minus UMRM+XRM value, CMRM+XRM value minus XRM value respectively.
Time Frame
Immediately before injection and after injection
Title
Sensitivity Difference in the Determination of Multifocal Malignant Breast Disease Using CMRM vs UMRM, CMRM+XRM vs UMRM+XRM, and CMRM+XRM vs XRM Verified by SoT, Breast Region Level
Description
For a single participant the sensitivity was defined as the proportion of malignant breast regions that were recognized by the reader using the respective imaging modality as malignant. Subsequently the point estimates were calculated based on the mean of the sensitivities across all participants. The difference in sensitivity is calculated as CMRM value minus UMRM value, CMRM+XRM value minus UMRM+XRM value, CMRM+XRM value minus XRM value respectively.
Time Frame
Immediately before injection and after injection
Title
Specificity Difference in the Determination of Malignant Breast Disease Using CMRM vs UMRM, CMRM+XRM vs UMRM+XRM, and CMRM+XRM vs XRM Verified by SoT, Breast Region Level
Description
A malignant breast was defined as FP, when the reader using the respective imaging modality assessed more breast regions as malignant as were present according to SoT. Otherwise the breast was assessed as TN. Specificity was then defined as TN/(TN+FP). The difference was calculated as CMRM value minus UMRM value, CMRM+XRM value minus UMRM+XRM value, CMRM+XRM value minus XRM value respectively.
Time Frame
Immediately before injection and after injection
Title
Specificity Difference in the Determination of Unifocal Malignant Breast Disease Using CMRM vs UMRM, CMRM+XRM vs UMRM+XRM, and CMRM+XRM vs XRM Verified by SoT, Breast Region Level
Description
A malignant breast was defined as FP, when the reader using the respective imaging modality assessed more breast regions as malignant as were present according to SoT. Otherwise the breast was assessed as TN. Specificity was then defined as TN/(TN+FP). The difference was calculated as CMRM value minus UMRM value, CMRM+XRM value minus UMRM+XRM value, CMRM+XRM value minus XRM value respectively.
Time Frame
Immediately before injection and after injection
Title
Specificity Difference in the Determination of Multifocal Malignant Breast Disease Using CMRM vs UMRM, CMRM+XRM vs UMRM+XRM, and CMRM+XRM vs XRM Verified by SoT, Breast Region Level
Description
A malignant breast was defined as FP, when the reader using the respective imaging modality assessed more breast regions as malignant as were present according to SoT. Otherwise the breast was assessed as TN. Specificity was then defined as TN/(TN+FP). The difference was calculated as CMRM value minus UMRM value, CMRM+XRM value minus UMRM+XRM value, CMRM+XRM value minus XRM value respectively.
Time Frame
Immediately before injection and after injection
Title
Sensitivity of Detection of Multicentric Malignant Disease Verified by SoT, Breast Level
Description
For a single participant the sensitivity was defined as the proportion of malignant breast regions that were recognized by the reader using the respective imaging modality as malignant. Subsequently the point estimates were calculated based on the mean of the sensitivities across all participants. The difference was calculated as CMRM value minus UMRM value, CMRM+XRM value minus UMRM+XRM value, CMRM+XRM value minus XRM value respectively.
Time Frame
Immediately before injection and after injection
Title
Accuracy Difference of Presence of Bilateral Malignant Disease Verified by SoT by Clinical Investigator, Participant Level
Description
The disease state "bilateral malignant disease" was derived from the assessment of the different regions for each breast (right and left) for investigators for each imaging modality (UMRM, CMRM, XRM, UMRM+XRM, and CMRM+XRM) based on the following rule: If the participant had at least one breast with no malignant region , the assessment of bilateral malignant disease was categorized as "No". If the participant had at least one malignant lesion in both breasts, the assessment of bilateral malignant disease was categorized as "Yes". The proportion of correct matches of each different image set to the SoT for the existence of bilateral malignant disease were derived. The analysis was based on the difference in accuracy for the evaluation of bilateral malignant disease for the following image comparisons on a participant level. The difference was calculated as CMRM value minus UMRM value, CMRM+XRM value minus UMRM+XRM value, CMRM+XRM value minus XRM value respectively.
Time Frame
Immediately before injection and after injection
Title
Blinded Readers: Inter-reader Agreement on Sensitivity Based on Assessment for UMRM vs CMRM - Breast Region Level
Description
Inter-reader agreement was assessed by considering each breast region to have 2 possibilities (malignant disease / no malignant disease) for an assessment by the 2 image sets (UMRM and CMRM). Kappa value varies from 0 (no agreement) to 1 (perfect agreement).
Time Frame
Immediately before injection and after injection
Title
Blinded Reader 1: Intra-reader Variability Based on Assessment for CMRM - Breast Level
Description
Intra-reader variability was assessed using a kappa on the match to SoT for the different regions within each participant (match, no match SoT). For each of the 3 readers, intra-reader agreement was assessed by considering each breast region to have 2 possibilities for an assessment by CMRM: matched SoT or did not match SoT. Kappa value varies from 0 (no agreement) to 1 (perfect agreement).
Time Frame
Immediately before injection and after injection
Title
Blinded Reader 2: Intra-reader Variability Based on Assessment for CMRM - Breast Level
Description
Intra-reader variability was assessed using a kappa on the match to SoT for the different regions within each participant (match, no match SoT). For each of the 3 readers, intra-reader agreement was assessed by considering each breast region to have 2 possibilities for an assessment by CMRM: matched SoT or did not match SoT. Kappa value varies from 0 (no agreement) to 1 (perfect agreement).
Time Frame
Immediately before injection and after injection
Title
Blinded Reader 3: Intra-reader Variability Based on Assessment for CMRM - Breast Level
Description
Intra-reader variability was assessed using a kappa on the match to SoT for the different regions within each participant (match, no match SoT). For each of the 3 readers, intra-reader agreement was assessed by considering each breast region to have 2 possibilities for an assessment by CMRM: matched SoT or did not match SoT. Kappa value varies from 0 (no agreement) to 1 (perfect agreement).
Time Frame
Immediately before injection and after injection
Title
Categorical Accuracy Difference of Extent of Malignant Disease Verified by SoT by Majority Reader, Breast Region Level
Time Frame
Immediately before injection and after injection
Title
Categorical Accuracy Difference of Extent of Malignant Disease Verified by Histopathology by Majority Reader, Breast Region Level
Time Frame
Immediately before injection and after injection
Title
Vital Signs Change From Baseline and Follow-up 24 Hours Post Injection - Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure
Description
Systolic and diastolic blood pressure were measured in a supine position. Blood pressure was not to be measured on the arm used for the injection.
Time Frame
Baseline, 24 hours post injection
Title
Vital Signs Change From Baseline and Follow-up 24 Hours Post Injection - Heart Rate
Description
Heart rate was measured in a supine position.
Time Frame
Baseline, Follow-up visit (24 hours post injection)
Title
Number of Participants With at Least One Laboratory Parameter Change From Low or Normal at Baseline to Abnormally High at Follow-up 24 Hours Post Injection
Description
Number of participants with at least one occurrence of changing from low or normal at baseline to high at follow-up.
Time Frame
Baseline, Follow-up visit (24 hours post injection)

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Recent histologically proven diagnosis of breast cancer after having obtained X-Ray Mammography (XRM) of both breasts (according to American College of Radiology [ACR] and performed no longer than 6 weeks prior to enrollment into the study) and has been referred for a contrast-enhanced Magnetic Resonance Mammography (MRM) prior to surgery of the breast. if female, a digital XRM is required if any of the following criteria is met: a. patient is younger than 50 years; b. patient has heterogeneously or extremely dense breasts; c. is not post-menopausal (post-menopause defined as at least 12 months prior to inclusion without menstruation). if female of childbearing potential, MRM should be performed on the 7-14th day of the menstrual cycle. has an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) value >/= 60 mL/min/1.73m^2 derived from a serum creatinine result within 2 weeks prior to study enrollment. Exclusion Criteria: is a female patient who is pregnant or lactating has any contraindication to the MRM examination (e.g. metal implants, phobia) or the use of gadolinium-containing contrast agents. has received any contrast agent within 24 hours prior to the study MRM, or is scheduled to receive any contrast agent within 24 hours after the study MRM. has severe cardiovascular disease (e.g., known long QT syndrome, acute myocardial infarction [< 14 days], unstable angina, congestive heart failure New York Heart Association class IV) or acute stroke (< 48 hours)). has acute renal insufficiency of any severity due to hepato-renal syndrome or in the peri-operative liver transplantation period or who has acute or chronic moderate or severe renal insufficiency (glomerular filtration rate < 60 mL/min/1.73m^2). has received chemotherapy or hormonal therapy for breast cancer within 6 months. has received hormone replacement therapy within 4 weeks prior to study drug administration. is scheduled or likely to require a surgery and/or biopsy in the time period up to 24 hours following study drug application has prior excisional biopsy or breast surgery less than 6 months before enrollment and between XRM and study MRM
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Bayer Study Director
Organizational Affiliation
Bayer
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
City
Tucson
State/Province
Arizona
ZIP/Postal Code
85724
Country
United States
City
Oakland
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
94609
Country
United States
City
Englewood
State/Province
Colorado
ZIP/Postal Code
80112
Country
United States
City
Chicago
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60637
Country
United States
City
New York
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
10065
Country
United States
City
Columbus
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
43212
Country
United States
City
Providence
State/Province
Rhode Island
ZIP/Postal Code
02903
Country
United States
City
San Antonio
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
78229
Country
United States
City
Tacoma
State/Province
Washington
ZIP/Postal Code
98321
Country
United States
City
Buenos Aires
State/Province
Ciudad Auton. de Buenos Aires
ZIP/Postal Code
C1082A
Country
Argentina
City
Buenos Aires
State/Province
Ciudad Auton. de Buenos Aires
ZIP/Postal Code
C1181ACH
Country
Argentina
City
Buenos Aires
State/Province
Ciudad Auton. de Buenos Aires
ZIP/Postal Code
C1425BEE
Country
Argentina
City
Hamilton
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
L8N 4A6
Country
Canada
City
Toronto
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
M5G 2M9
Country
Canada
City
Toronto
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
M5S 1B2
Country
Canada
City
Montreal
State/Province
Quebec
ZIP/Postal Code
H4J 1C5
Country
Canada
City
Erlangen
State/Province
Bayern
ZIP/Postal Code
91054
Country
Germany
City
München
State/Province
Bayern
ZIP/Postal Code
81377
Country
Germany
City
Frankfurt
State/Province
Hessen
ZIP/Postal Code
60596
Country
Germany
City
Greifswald
State/Province
Mecklenburg-Vorpommern
ZIP/Postal Code
17489
Country
Germany
City
Göttingen
State/Province
Niedersachsen
ZIP/Postal Code
37081
Country
Germany
City
Göttingen
State/Province
Niedersachsen
ZIP/Postal Code
37099
Country
Germany
City
Bochum
State/Province
Nordrhein-Westfalen
ZIP/Postal Code
44892
Country
Germany
City
Münster
State/Province
Nordrhein-Westfalen
ZIP/Postal Code
48145
Country
Germany
City
Münster
State/Province
Nordrhein-Westfalen
ZIP/Postal Code
48149
Country
Germany
City
Gera
State/Province
Thüringen
ZIP/Postal Code
07548
Country
Germany
City
Berlin
ZIP/Postal Code
10115
Country
Germany
City
Mumbai
State/Province
Maharashtra
ZIP/Postal Code
400012
Country
India
City
Delhi
ZIP/Postal Code
110085
Country
India
City
Mumbai
ZIP/Postal Code
400 004
Country
India
City
Eindhoven
State/Province
EJ
ZIP/Postal Code
5623
Country
Netherlands
City
Maastricht
ZIP/Postal Code
6229 HX
Country
Netherlands
City
Nijmegen
ZIP/Postal Code
6525 GA
Country
Netherlands
City
Bydgoszcz
ZIP/Postal Code
85-796
Country
Poland
City
Gliwice
ZIP/Postal Code
44-100
Country
Poland
City
Krakow
ZIP/Postal Code
30-501
Country
Poland
City
Szczecin
ZIP/Postal Code
70-111
Country
Poland
City
Warszawa
ZIP/Postal Code
02-781
Country
Poland
City
Sabadell
State/Province
Barcelona
ZIP/Postal Code
08208
Country
Spain
City
Alzira
State/Province
Valencia
Country
Spain
City
Barcelona
ZIP/Postal Code
08036
Country
Spain
City
Cordoba
ZIP/Postal Code
14004
Country
Spain
City
Girona
ZIP/Postal Code
17002
Country
Spain
City
Taichung
Country
Taiwan
City
Taipei
ZIP/Postal Code
100
Country
Taiwan
City
Taipei
ZIP/Postal Code
110
Country
Taiwan
City
Taipei
ZIP/Postal Code
114
Country
Taiwan
City
Taizung
ZIP/Postal Code
402
Country
Taiwan

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
35462754
Citation
Endrikat J, Schmidt G, Haverstock D, Weber O, Trnkova ZJ, Barkhausen J. Sensitivity of Contrast-Enhanced Breast MRI vs X-ray Mammography Based on Cancer Histology, Tumor Grading, Receptor Status, and Molecular Subtype: A Supplemental Analysis of 2 Large Phase III Studies. Breast Cancer (Auckl). 2022 Apr 19;16:11782234221092155. doi: 10.1177/11782234221092155. eCollection 2022.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
26840494
Citation
Sardanelli F, Newstead GM, Putz B, Jirakova Trnkova Z, Trimboli RM, Abe H, Haverstock D, Rosenberg M. Gadobutrol-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Breast in the Preoperative Setting: Results of 2 Prospective International Multicenter Phase III Studies. Invest Radiol. 2016 Jul;51(7):454-61. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000254.
Results Reference
derived
Links:
URL
http://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu
Description
Click here and search for information of Bayer products for Europe

Learn more about this trial

Efficacy and Safety of Gadobutrol 1.0 Molar (Gadovist) for Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs