search
Back to results

A Safety and Efficacy Study of Canagliflozin in Older Patients (55 to 80 Years of Age) With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Primary Purpose

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Canagliflozin 100 mg
Canagliflozin 300 mg
Antihyperglycemic agent(s)
Placebo
Sponsored by
Janssen Research & Development, LLC
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 focused on measuring Canagliflozin, Placebo, Hemoglobin A1c, Bone, Type 2 diabetes mellitus

Eligibility Criteria

55 Years - 80 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All patients must have a diagnosis of T2DM and may be currently treated with a stable regimen of antihyperglycemic agent(s)
  • Patients in the study must have a HbA1c between >=7 and <=10.0%
  • Patients must have a fasting plasma glucose (FPG) <270 mg/dL (15 mmol/L)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of diabetic ketoacidosis, type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM), pancreas or beta cell transplantation, or diabetes secondary to pancreatitis or pancreatectomy, or a severe hypoglycemic episode within 6 months before screening

Sites / Locations

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm Type

Experimental

Experimental

Placebo Comparator

Arm Label

Canagliflozin 100 mg

Canagliflozin 300 mg

Placebo

Arm Description

Each patient will receive 100 mg of canagliflozin once daily for 104 weeks with/without stable doses of antihyperglycemic agent(s) taken at the time of study entry.

Each patient will receive 300 mg of canagliflozin once daily for 104 weeks with/without stable doses of antihyperglycemic agent(s) taken at the time of study entry.

Each patient will receive matching placebo once daily for 104 weeks with/without stable doses of antihyperglycemic agent(s) taken at the time of study entry.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Change in HbA1c From Baseline to Week 26
The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean change in HbA1c from Baseline to Week 26 for each treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus placebo) in the LS mean change.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Percentage of Patients With HbA1c <7% at Week 26
The table below shows the percentage of patients with HbA1c <7% at Week 26 in each treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus placebo) in the percentage.
Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) From Baseline to Week 26
The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean change in FPG from Baseline to Week 26 for each treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus placebo) in the LS mean change.
Percent Change in Body Weight From Baseline to Week 26
The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean percent change in body weight from Baseline to Week 26 for each treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus placebo) in the LS mean change.
Change in Total Fat From Baseline to Week 26 in a Subset of Patients Undergoing Specific Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) Analysis for Body Composition
The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean change in total fat from Baseline to Week 26 for each treatment group in patients randomized to the subset of patients undergoing specific DXA analysis for body composition. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus placebo) in the LS mean change.
Change in Region Percent Total Fat From Baseline to Week 26 in a Subset of Patients Undergoing Specific Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) Analysis for Body Composition
Region percent total fat = body fat as a percentage of (body fat + lean body mass + bone mass content). The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean change in region percent total fat from Baseline to Week 26 for each treatment group in patients randomized to the subset of patients undergoing specific dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) analysis for body composition. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus placebo) in the LS mean change.
Change in Tissue Percent Total Fat From Baseline to Week 26 in a Subset of Patients Undergoing Specific Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) Analysis for Body Composition
Tissue percent total fat = body fat as a percentage of body fat + lean body mass. The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean change in tissue percent total fat from Baseline to Week 26 for each treatment group in patients randomized to the subset of patients undergoing specific DXA analysis for body composition. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus placebo) in the LS mean change.
Change in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) From Baseline to Week 26
The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean change in SBP from Baseline to Week 26 for each treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus placebo) in the LS mean change.
Percent Change in Triglycerides From Baseline to Week 26
The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean percent change in triglycerides from Baseline to Week 26 for each treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus placebo) in the LS mean change.
Percent Change in High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) From Baseline to Week 26
The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean percent change in HDL-C from Baseline to Week 26 or each treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus placebo) in the LS mean change.
Percent Change in Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density (BMD) From Baseline to Week 26
The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean percent change from Baseline to Week 26 in lumbar spine BMD for each treatment group as assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus placebo) in LS mean percent change.
Percent Change in Distal Forearm Bone Mineral Density (BMD) From Baseline to Week 26
The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean percent change from Baseline to Week 26 in distal forearm BMD for each treatment group as assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus placebo) in LS mean percent change.
Percent Change in Femoral Neck Bone Mineral Density (BMD) From Baseline to Week 26
The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean percent change from Baseline to Week 26 in femoral neck BMD for each treatment group as assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus placebo) in LS mean percent change.
Percent Change in Total Hip Bone Mineral Density (BMD) From Baseline to Week 26
The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean percent change from Baseline to Week 26 in total hip BMD for each treatment group as assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus placebo) in LS mean percent change.

Full Information

First Posted
April 1, 2010
Last Updated
October 27, 2014
Sponsor
Janssen Research & Development, LLC
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01106651
Brief Title
A Safety and Efficacy Study of Canagliflozin in Older Patients (55 to 80 Years of Age) With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Official Title
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Canagliflozin Compared With Placebo in the Treatment of Older Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Inadequately Controlled on Glucose Lowering Therapy
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
October 2014
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
June 2010 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
November 2011 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
May 2013 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Janssen Research & Development, LLC

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 2 different doses of canagliflozin compared with placebo in older patients (55 to 80 years of age) with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) with inadequate control on their current diabetes treatment regimen.
Detailed Description
Canagliflozin is a drug that is being tested to see if it may be useful in treating patients diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). This is a randomized (study drug assigned by chance), double-blind (neither the patient or the study doctor will know the name of the assigned treatment), placebo-controlled, parallel-group, 3-arm (3 treatment groups) multicenter study to determine the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of canagliflozin (100 mg and 300 mg) compared to placebo (a capsule that looks like all the other treatments but has no real medicine) in patients with T2DM who are not achieving an adequate response from current antihyperglycemic therapy to control their diabetes. Approximately 720 older (55 to 80 years of age) patients with T2DM who are either not on an antihyperglycemic agent or who are receiving treatment with a stable regimen of antihyperglycemic agent(s) and have inadequate glycemic (blood sugar) control will receive once daily treatment with canagliflozin (100 mg or 300 mg) or placebo capsules for 104 weeks (includes 26 weeks of double-blind treatment followed by a 78-week extension period). In addition, all patients will take stable doses of the antihyperglycemic agent(s) that they were taking before entry in the study for the duration of the study. Patients will participate in the study for approximately 108 weeks. During the study, if a patient's fasting blood sugar remains high despite treatment with study drug, the patient will receive treatment with an antihyperglycemic agent (rescue therapy) that is considered clinically appropriate and consistent with local prescribing information. During treatment, patients will be monitored for safety by review of adverse events, results from laboratory tests, measures of bone health, 12-lead electrocardiograms (ECGs), vital signs measurements, body weight, physical examinations, and self-monitored blood glucose (SMGB) measurements. The primary outcome measure in the study is the effect of canagliflozin relative to placebo on hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) after 26 weeks of treatment. Study drug will be taken orally (by mouth) once daily before the first meal each day unless otherwise specified. All patients will take single-blind placebo capsules for 2 weeks before randomization. After randomization, patients will take double blind canagliflozin (100 mg or 300 mg) or matching placebo for 104 weeks.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
Keywords
Canagliflozin, Placebo, Hemoglobin A1c, Bone, Type 2 diabetes mellitus

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderInvestigator
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
716 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Canagliflozin 100 mg
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Each patient will receive 100 mg of canagliflozin once daily for 104 weeks with/without stable doses of antihyperglycemic agent(s) taken at the time of study entry.
Arm Title
Canagliflozin 300 mg
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Each patient will receive 300 mg of canagliflozin once daily for 104 weeks with/without stable doses of antihyperglycemic agent(s) taken at the time of study entry.
Arm Title
Placebo
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
Each patient will receive matching placebo once daily for 104 weeks with/without stable doses of antihyperglycemic agent(s) taken at the time of study entry.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Canagliflozin 100 mg
Intervention Description
One 100 mg over-encapsulated tablet orally (by mouth) once daily for 104 weeks with/without stable doses of antihyperglycemic agent(s) taken at the time of study entry.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Canagliflozin 300 mg
Intervention Description
One 300 mg over-encapsulated tablet orally (by mouth) once daily for 104 weeks with/without stable doses of antihyperglycemic agent(s) taken at the time of study entry.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Antihyperglycemic agent(s)
Intervention Description
Stable doses of antihyperglycemic agents (sulfonylurea agent, thiazolidinediones, dipeptidyl peptidase 4 [DPP-4] inhibitors, metformin, insulin [all types]) and their combinations (sulfonylurea agent and insulin [all types], metformin and insulin [all types], metformin and sulfonylurea, alpha glucosidase inhibitors, thiazolidinediones, dipeptidyl peptidase 4 [DPP-4]) are used as per protocol specifications.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Placebo
Intervention Description
One matching placebo capsule orally once daily for 104 weeks with/without stable doses of antihyperglycemic agent(s) taken at the time of study entry.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in HbA1c From Baseline to Week 26
Description
The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean change in HbA1c from Baseline to Week 26 for each treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus placebo) in the LS mean change.
Time Frame
Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Percentage of Patients With HbA1c <7% at Week 26
Description
The table below shows the percentage of patients with HbA1c <7% at Week 26 in each treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus placebo) in the percentage.
Time Frame
Week 26
Title
Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) From Baseline to Week 26
Description
The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean change in FPG from Baseline to Week 26 for each treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus placebo) in the LS mean change.
Time Frame
Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26
Title
Percent Change in Body Weight From Baseline to Week 26
Description
The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean percent change in body weight from Baseline to Week 26 for each treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus placebo) in the LS mean change.
Time Frame
Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26
Title
Change in Total Fat From Baseline to Week 26 in a Subset of Patients Undergoing Specific Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) Analysis for Body Composition
Description
The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean change in total fat from Baseline to Week 26 for each treatment group in patients randomized to the subset of patients undergoing specific DXA analysis for body composition. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus placebo) in the LS mean change.
Time Frame
Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26
Title
Change in Region Percent Total Fat From Baseline to Week 26 in a Subset of Patients Undergoing Specific Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) Analysis for Body Composition
Description
Region percent total fat = body fat as a percentage of (body fat + lean body mass + bone mass content). The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean change in region percent total fat from Baseline to Week 26 for each treatment group in patients randomized to the subset of patients undergoing specific dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) analysis for body composition. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus placebo) in the LS mean change.
Time Frame
Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26
Title
Change in Tissue Percent Total Fat From Baseline to Week 26 in a Subset of Patients Undergoing Specific Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) Analysis for Body Composition
Description
Tissue percent total fat = body fat as a percentage of body fat + lean body mass. The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean change in tissue percent total fat from Baseline to Week 26 for each treatment group in patients randomized to the subset of patients undergoing specific DXA analysis for body composition. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus placebo) in the LS mean change.
Time Frame
Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26
Title
Change in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) From Baseline to Week 26
Description
The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean change in SBP from Baseline to Week 26 for each treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus placebo) in the LS mean change.
Time Frame
Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26
Title
Percent Change in Triglycerides From Baseline to Week 26
Description
The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean percent change in triglycerides from Baseline to Week 26 for each treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus placebo) in the LS mean change.
Time Frame
Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26
Title
Percent Change in High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) From Baseline to Week 26
Description
The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean percent change in HDL-C from Baseline to Week 26 or each treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus placebo) in the LS mean change.
Time Frame
Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26
Title
Percent Change in Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density (BMD) From Baseline to Week 26
Description
The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean percent change from Baseline to Week 26 in lumbar spine BMD for each treatment group as assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus placebo) in LS mean percent change.
Time Frame
Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26
Title
Percent Change in Distal Forearm Bone Mineral Density (BMD) From Baseline to Week 26
Description
The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean percent change from Baseline to Week 26 in distal forearm BMD for each treatment group as assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus placebo) in LS mean percent change.
Time Frame
Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26
Title
Percent Change in Femoral Neck Bone Mineral Density (BMD) From Baseline to Week 26
Description
The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean percent change from Baseline to Week 26 in femoral neck BMD for each treatment group as assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus placebo) in LS mean percent change.
Time Frame
Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26
Title
Percent Change in Total Hip Bone Mineral Density (BMD) From Baseline to Week 26
Description
The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean percent change from Baseline to Week 26 in total hip BMD for each treatment group as assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus placebo) in LS mean percent change.
Time Frame
Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
55 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
80 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: All patients must have a diagnosis of T2DM and may be currently treated with a stable regimen of antihyperglycemic agent(s) Patients in the study must have a HbA1c between >=7 and <=10.0% Patients must have a fasting plasma glucose (FPG) <270 mg/dL (15 mmol/L) Exclusion Criteria: History of diabetic ketoacidosis, type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM), pancreas or beta cell transplantation, or diabetes secondary to pancreatitis or pancreatectomy, or a severe hypoglycemic episode within 6 months before screening
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Janssen Research & Development, LLC Clinical Trial
Organizational Affiliation
Janssen Research & Development, LLC
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
City
Glendale
State/Province
Arizona
Country
United States
City
Phoenix
State/Province
Arizona
Country
United States
City
Little Rock
State/Province
Arkansas
Country
United States
City
Carmichael
State/Province
California
Country
United States
City
Citrus Heights
State/Province
California
Country
United States
City
Fair Oaks
State/Province
California
Country
United States
City
Roseville
State/Province
California
Country
United States
City
Sacramento
State/Province
California
Country
United States
City
San Diego
State/Province
California
Country
United States
City
Walnut Creek
State/Province
California
Country
United States
City
Daytona Beach
State/Province
Florida
Country
United States
City
Fleming Island
State/Province
Florida
Country
United States
City
Jacksonville
State/Province
Florida
Country
United States
City
Miami
State/Province
Florida
Country
United States
City
Atlanta
State/Province
Georgia
Country
United States
City
Wichita
State/Province
Kansas
Country
United States
City
Waltham
State/Province
Massachusetts
Country
United States
City
Pahrump
State/Province
Nevada
Country
United States
City
Albuquerque
State/Province
New Mexico
Country
United States
City
Cary
State/Province
North Carolina
Country
United States
City
Charlotte
State/Province
North Carolina
Country
United States
City
Wilmington
State/Province
North Carolina
Country
United States
City
Bismarck
State/Province
North Dakota
Country
United States
City
Franklin
State/Province
Ohio
Country
United States
City
Mount Pleasant
State/Province
South Carolina
Country
United States
City
Bristol
State/Province
Tennessee
Country
United States
City
Carrollton
State/Province
Texas
Country
United States
City
Dallas
State/Province
Texas
Country
United States
City
Irving
State/Province
Texas
Country
United States
City
Plano
State/Province
Texas
Country
United States
City
Richardson
State/Province
Texas
Country
United States
City
Renton
State/Province
Washington
Country
United States
City
Tacoma
State/Province
Washington
Country
United States
City
Wenatchee
State/Province
Washington
Country
United States
City
Fremantle
Country
Australia
City
Heidelberg Heights
Country
Australia
City
Meadowbrook
Country
Australia
City
Richmond
Country
Australia
City
Vancouver
State/Province
British Columbia
Country
Canada
City
St. John'S
State/Province
Newfoundland and Labrador
Country
Canada
City
Barrie
State/Province
Ontario
Country
Canada
City
London
State/Province
Ontario
Country
Canada
City
Markham
State/Province
Ontario
Country
Canada
City
Oakville
State/Province
Ontario
Country
Canada
City
Toronto
State/Province
Ontario
Country
Canada
City
Montreal
State/Province
Quebec
Country
Canada
City
Barranquilla
Country
Colombia
City
Bogota
Country
Colombia
City
Corbeil Essonnes
Country
France
City
Paris
Country
France
City
Venissieux
Country
France
City
Thessalonikis
Country
Greece
City
Thessaloniki
Country
Greece
City
Sha Tin
Country
Hong Kong
City
Bangalore
Country
India
City
Nagpur
Country
India
City
Pune
Country
India
City
Auckland
Country
New Zealand
City
Christchurch
Country
New Zealand
City
Tauranga
Country
New Zealand
City
Wellington
Country
New Zealand
City
Katowice
Country
Poland
City
Krakow
Country
Poland
City
Torun
Country
Poland
City
Warszawa
Country
Poland
City
Wroclaw
Country
Poland
City
Bucharest
Country
Romania
City
Sibiu
Country
Romania
City
Pretoria
Country
South Africa
City
Granada
Country
Spain
City
Madrid
Country
Spain
City
Pozuelo De Alarcon
Country
Spain
City
Sevilla
Country
Spain
City
Göteborg
Country
Sweden
City
Uppsala
Country
Sweden
City
Bruderholz
Country
Switzerland
City
St Gallen
Country
Switzerland
City
Kharkov
Country
Ukraine
City
Kiev
Country
Ukraine
City
Birmingham
Country
United Kingdom
City
Cardiff
Country
United Kingdom
City
Glasgow
Country
United Kingdom
City
Liverpool
Country
United Kingdom
City
Manchester
Country
United Kingdom
City
Reading
Country
United Kingdom
City
Salford
Country
United Kingdom

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
28619659
Citation
Januzzi JL Jr, Butler J, Jarolim P, Sattar N, Vijapurkar U, Desai M, Davies MJ. Effects of Canagliflozin on Cardiovascular Biomarkers in Older Adults With Type 2 Diabetes. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Aug 8;70(6):704-712. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.06.016. Epub 2017 Jun 12.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
27977934
Citation
Qiu R, Balis D, Xie J, Davies MJ, Desai M, Meininger G. Longer-term safety and tolerability of canagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes: a pooled analysis. Curr Med Res Opin. 2017 Mar;33(3):553-562. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2016.1271780. Epub 2017 Jan 4.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
27002421
Citation
Blonde L, Stenlof K, Fung A, Xie J, Canovatchel W, Meininger G. Effects of canagliflozin on body weight and body composition in patients with type 2 diabetes over 104 weeks. Postgrad Med. 2016 May;128(4):371-80. doi: 10.1080/00325481.2016.1169894. Epub 2016 Apr 7.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
26580237
Citation
Watts NB, Bilezikian JP, Usiskin K, Edwards R, Desai M, Law G, Meininger G. Effects of Canagliflozin on Fracture Risk in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2016 Jan;101(1):157-66. doi: 10.1210/jc.2015-3167. Epub 2015 Nov 18.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
26580234
Citation
Bilezikian JP, Watts NB, Usiskin K, Polidori D, Fung A, Sullivan D, Rosenthal N. Evaluation of Bone Mineral Density and Bone Biomarkers in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Treated With Canagliflozin. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2016 Jan;101(1):44-51. doi: 10.1210/jc.2015-1860. Epub 2015 Nov 18.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
24786834
Citation
Weir MR, Kline I, Xie J, Edwards R, Usiskin K. Effect of canagliflozin on serum electrolytes in patients with type 2 diabetes in relation to estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Curr Med Res Opin. 2014 Sep;30(9):1759-68. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2014.919907. Epub 2014 May 22.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
24517339
Citation
Nyirjesy P, Sobel JD, Fung A, Mayer C, Capuano G, Ways K, Usiskin K. Genital mycotic infections with canagliflozin, a sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor, in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a pooled analysis of clinical studies. Curr Med Res Opin. 2014 Jun;30(6):1109-19. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2014.890925. Epub 2014 Feb 21.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
23680739
Citation
Bode B, Stenlof K, Sullivan D, Fung A, Usiskin K. Efficacy and safety of canagliflozin treatment in older subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized trial. Hosp Pract (1995). 2013 Apr;41(2):72-84. doi: 10.3810/hp.2013.04.1020.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

A Safety and Efficacy Study of Canagliflozin in Older Patients (55 to 80 Years of Age) With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs