Phase II Study of Afinitor vs. Sutent in Patients With Metastatic Non-Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma (ASPEN)
Primary Purpose
Advanced Non-clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma
Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Everolimus
Sunitinib
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Advanced Non-clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma focused on measuring cancer, kidney cancer, sutent, everolimus, renal cancer, papillary renal cell, chromophobe renal cell, papillary, chromophobe
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Histologically confirmed advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC), with non-clear cell pathology.
- RCC tumor tissue available for correlative sciences, from either primary or metastatic site or both.
- At the time of screening, at least 4 weeks since prior palliative radiation therapy and/or major surgery, and resolution of all toxic effects of prior therapy to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE; version 4.0) Grade 1.
- Subject must have radiographic evidence of metastatic disease with at least 1 measurable per RECIST 1.1 criteria (Attachment 1)].
- Age > 18 years.
- Adequate laboratory values
- Karnofsky Performance Status ≥ 60 (Attachment 2).
- Life expectancy of at least 3 months.
- Written, signed, dated, and witnessed Institutional Review Board (IRB) or Institutional Ethics Committee (IEC) approved informed consent form (ICF) before any screening procedures are performed.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Subjects with a history of or active central nervous system (CNS) metastases.
- Prior systemic therapy for RCC, including mTOR and anti-angiogenic therapy, chemotherapy, biologic or experimental therapy.
- Subjects with collecting duct, medullary, small cell, oncocytoma, or lymphoma-type pathology.
- Subjects receiving known strong CYP3A4 isoenzyme inhibitors and/or inducers.
- Major surgery, open biopsy, traumatic injury, or radiotherapy within 4 weeks of the screening visit.
- Subjects who have not recovered from prior biopsy, surgery, traumatic injury, and/or radiation therapy.
- Presence of a non-healing wound or ulcer.
- Grade 3 hemorrhage within the past month.
- Hypertension with systolic blood pressure of >180 mm Hg and/or diastolic pressure >100 mm Hg.
- Subjects with American Heart Association (AHA) Class 2-4 heart disease or any history of congestive heart failure with an ejection fraction <50%, or history of unstable angina, myocardial infarction, coronary artery bypass graft, cerebrovascular accident, transient ischemic attack, or pulmonary embolism within 6 months of entry.
- Diabetes mellitus with glycosylated hemoglobin A1c (HbgA1c) > 10% despite therapy.
- A history of interstitial pneumonitis.
- Subjects with active autoimmune disorder(s) being treated with immunosuppressive agents within 4 weeks prior to the screening visit.
- Subjects receiving immunosuppressive agents and those with chronic viral/bacterial/fungal illnesses such as human immunodeficiency virus (HIV).
- Patients who have receive immunization with attenuated live vaccines within one week of study entry or during study period.
- Patients with active infection(s), active antimicrobial therapy or serious intercurrent illness.
- History of other prior malignancy in past 5 years.
- Pregnant or nursing women.
- Major medical/psychiatric illness that, in the investigator's judgment, will substantially increase the risk associated with the subject's participation in this study, including inability to absorb oral medications and history of noncompliance to medical regimens.
- Known hypersensitivity to any of the components in everolimus or sunitinib product
- Subjects taking agents that significantly prolong the QTc interval are not eligible.
- Proteinuria with a spot urine protein/creatinine ratio >2 or 24 hour urine protein >2 grams per 24 hours.
- Severely impaired lung function as defined as spirometry and Carbon Monoxide Diffusing Capacity (DLCO) that is 50% of the normal predicted value and/or O2 saturation that is 88% or less at rest on room air.
- Advanced liver disease such as cirrhosis or severe hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh class C).
Sites / Locations
- University of Chicago
- Indiana University Melvin and Bran Simon Cancer Center
- Karmanos Cancer Institute/Wayne State University
- Washington Univ in St. Louis-School of Medicine
- Duke Univeristy Medical Center
- Cleveland Clinic
- Oregon Health & Science University
- SCRI
- The Vanderbilt Clinic, Henry-Joyce Cancer Center
- BC Cancer Agency
- CancerCare Manitoba, Med Onc, Dept Hem and Onc
- London Health Sciences Center
- Cambridge Cancer Trials Centre
- The Royal Marsden NHS
- The Christie Hospital NHS
- Weston Park Hospital
- Churchill Hospital
- Beatson West Scotland Cancer Centre
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Active Comparator
Arm Label
RAD001
Sunitinib
Arm Description
Subjects in this treatment arm will receive everolimus/RAD001 10 mg orally once daily by mouth on days 1 through 42 for each 42 day cycle.
Subjects in this treatment arm will take sunitinib 50 mg daily by mouth on days 1 through 28 of each 42 day cycle.
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Anti-tumor Activity as Measured by Median Progression Free Survival Time
The primary objective will be to compare the anti-tumor activity of everolimus and sunitinib in subjects with mRCC with non-clear cell pathology, as measured by progression-free survival (PFS) following treatment initiation according to RECIST 1.1 criteria. Progressive disease is defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the LD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. (Note: the appearance of one or more new lesions is also considered progression).
Secondary Outcome Measures
Progression Free Survival Rates
6-, 12-, and 24-month rates of PFS in each arm will be compared for each treatment arm. Progressive disease is defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the LD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. (Note: the appearance of one or more new lesions is also considered progression).
PFS Expressed in Months
Progression-free survival (PFS) expressed in months as compared to an historic control (interferon-treated clear cell RCC control arm from the sunitinib phase III study). Progressive disease is defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the LD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. (Note: the appearance of one or more new lesions is also considered progression).
Overall Response Rate
Defined as complete response [CR] and partial response [PR] by RECIST 1.1 criteria in each treatment arm.Overall Response Rate (ORR) = CR + PR. Complete Response (CR) is disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to <10 mm. Partial Response (PR) is at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters.
Percentage of Participants With Stable Disease (SD)
Percentage of participants with stable disease during treatment is defined as stable disease [SD] by RECIST 1.1 criteria as calculated in each treatment arm. Stable Disease (SD) is defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum diameters while on study.
12 Week Clinical Benefit Rate as Percentage
Rate of complete or partial response or stable disease by the RECIST 1.1 criteria lasting ≥ 12 weeks prior to progression. Benefit rate is defined as complete response [CR] and partial response [PR] and stable disease [SD] by RECIST 1.1 criteria in each treatment arm. Benefit rate = CR + PR + SD. Complete Response (CR) is disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to <10 mm. Partial Response (PR) is at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. Stable Disease (SD): Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum diameters while on study.
Overall Survival Rates
To compare overall survival (OS) rates at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months and over time in each treatment arm.
Best Tumor Shrinkage as a Percentile in Each Arm
To compare the best tumor shrinkage as a percentile in each treatment arm. The percentile change at each follow up visit is calculated by measuring the percentage change in the Sum of lesion measurement from baseline. The best tumor shrinkage is lowest percentile change. A decrease is indicated by a negative percentage.
Median Duration of Response (CR, PR, and SD)
To compare the median duration of response (CR, PR, and SD) in each treatment arm. According to RECIST 1.1, Complete Response (CR) is disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to <10 mm. Partial Response (PR) is at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. Stable Disease (SD): Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum diameters while on study.
Median OS
To compare the median OS in each treatment arm.
Time-to-new Metastatic Disease in Each Treatment Arm
To compare the time-to-new metastatic disease in each treatment arm, defined from the date of first study agent administration to the onset of a new evaluable site of disease, excluding the primary site and all sites documented at baseline
Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events
To assess toxicities associated with everolimus or sunitinib using NCI CTC version 4.0 criteria
Change in Quality-of-life
To compare change in quality-of-life, as measured by the FACT-KSI scale at baseline and cycle 3 day 1 per subject in each treatment arm. Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Kidney Symptom Index. FKSI is a questionnaire for FACT-Kidney Symptom Index used to assess QoL/participant-reported outcomes for participants diagnosed with renal cell cancer. The FKSI contained 15 questions each ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much) so that FKSI ranged between 0-60 where higher scores reflects better functioning and fewer symptoms.
Change in Quality-of-life
To compare change in quality-of-life, as measured by the FACT-KSI scale at baseline and cycle 6 day1 per subject in each treatment arm. Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Kidney Symptom Index. FKSI is a questionnaire for FACT-Kidney Symptom Index used to assess QoL/participant-reported outcomes for participants diagnosed with renal cell cancer. The FKSI contained 15 questions each ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much) so that FKSI ranged between 0-60 where higher scores reflects better functioning and fewer symptoms.
Change in Quality-of-life
To compare change in quality-of-life, as measured by the FACT-KSI scale at baseline and end of treatment per subject in each treatment arm. Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Kidney Symptom Index. FKSI is a questionnaire for FACT-Kidney Symptom Index used to assess QoL/participant-reported outcomes for participants diagnosed with renal cell cancer. The FKSI contained 15 questions each ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much) so that FKSI ranged between 0-60 where higher scores reflects better functioning and fewer symptoms.
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT01108445
First Posted
April 20, 2010
Last Updated
December 15, 2017
Sponsor
Duke University
Collaborators
Novartis, Pfizer
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01108445
Brief Title
Phase II Study of Afinitor vs. Sutent in Patients With Metastatic Non-Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma
Acronym
ASPEN
Official Title
A Randomized Phase II Study of Afinitor (RAD001) vs. Sutent (Sunitinib) in Patients With Metastatic Non-Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma (ASPEN)
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
September 2017
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
September 2010 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
February 2015 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
April 2015 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Duke University
Collaborators
Novartis, Pfizer
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
To compare the anti-tumor activity of everolimus and sunitinib in subjects with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) with non-clear cell pathology.
Detailed Description
This will be an international (USA, Canada, and UK) open-label, outpatient, multicenter, randomized study of treatment with RAD001 (everolimus (Afinitor®) or sunitinib (Sutent®) in subjects with mRCC and non-clear cell histology. Special emphasis is placed on papillary and chromophobe histologies while sarcomatoid clear cell variants, medullary, and collecting duct carcinomas will be excluded (see eligibility). Subjects may continue receiving study drugs until disease progression, unacceptable toxicities, or withdrawal of consent, for a maximum of 24 months. Continuation of study assigned treatment will be allowed beyond 24 months at the discretion of the sponsor. Stratification variables will include histology (papillary vs. chromophobe) and Motzer risk criteria (0, 1-2, and 3). Tumor progression will be assessed locally and by independent review, in strict accordance with Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST 1.1) criteria measured every 12 weeks. At the time of progression, subjects will be taken off study other than simple administrative mortality follow-up. Primary pathologic samples and plasma/urine angiokine levels at baseline and over time will be collected and stored centrally for biomarker analysis.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Advanced Non-clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma
Keywords
cancer, kidney cancer, sutent, everolimus, renal cancer, papillary renal cell, chromophobe renal cell, papillary, chromophobe
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
131 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
RAD001
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Subjects in this treatment arm will receive everolimus/RAD001 10 mg orally once daily by mouth on days 1 through 42 for each 42 day cycle.
Arm Title
Sunitinib
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Subjects in this treatment arm will take sunitinib 50 mg daily by mouth on days 1 through 28 of each 42 day cycle.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Everolimus
Other Intervention Name(s)
Afinitor, everolimus, RAD001
Intervention Description
Subjects in this treatment arm will receive everolimusRAD001 10 mg orally once daily by mouth on days 1 through 42 for each 42 day cycle.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Sunitinib
Other Intervention Name(s)
Sutent
Intervention Description
50 mg daily by mouth on days 1 through 28 of each 42 day cycle.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Anti-tumor Activity as Measured by Median Progression Free Survival Time
Description
The primary objective will be to compare the anti-tumor activity of everolimus and sunitinib in subjects with mRCC with non-clear cell pathology, as measured by progression-free survival (PFS) following treatment initiation according to RECIST 1.1 criteria. Progressive disease is defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the LD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. (Note: the appearance of one or more new lesions is also considered progression).
Time Frame
24 Months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Progression Free Survival Rates
Description
6-, 12-, and 24-month rates of PFS in each arm will be compared for each treatment arm. Progressive disease is defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the LD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. (Note: the appearance of one or more new lesions is also considered progression).
Time Frame
6, 12 and 24 months
Title
PFS Expressed in Months
Description
Progression-free survival (PFS) expressed in months as compared to an historic control (interferon-treated clear cell RCC control arm from the sunitinib phase III study). Progressive disease is defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the LD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. (Note: the appearance of one or more new lesions is also considered progression).
Time Frame
24 months
Title
Overall Response Rate
Description
Defined as complete response [CR] and partial response [PR] by RECIST 1.1 criteria in each treatment arm.Overall Response Rate (ORR) = CR + PR. Complete Response (CR) is disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to <10 mm. Partial Response (PR) is at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters.
Time Frame
24 months
Title
Percentage of Participants With Stable Disease (SD)
Description
Percentage of participants with stable disease during treatment is defined as stable disease [SD] by RECIST 1.1 criteria as calculated in each treatment arm. Stable Disease (SD) is defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum diameters while on study.
Time Frame
Baseline to 36 months
Title
12 Week Clinical Benefit Rate as Percentage
Description
Rate of complete or partial response or stable disease by the RECIST 1.1 criteria lasting ≥ 12 weeks prior to progression. Benefit rate is defined as complete response [CR] and partial response [PR] and stable disease [SD] by RECIST 1.1 criteria in each treatment arm. Benefit rate = CR + PR + SD. Complete Response (CR) is disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to <10 mm. Partial Response (PR) is at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. Stable Disease (SD): Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum diameters while on study.
Time Frame
Baseline to 36 months
Title
Overall Survival Rates
Description
To compare overall survival (OS) rates at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months and over time in each treatment arm.
Time Frame
6, 12, 24, 36 months
Title
Best Tumor Shrinkage as a Percentile in Each Arm
Description
To compare the best tumor shrinkage as a percentile in each treatment arm. The percentile change at each follow up visit is calculated by measuring the percentage change in the Sum of lesion measurement from baseline. The best tumor shrinkage is lowest percentile change. A decrease is indicated by a negative percentage.
Time Frame
24 months
Title
Median Duration of Response (CR, PR, and SD)
Description
To compare the median duration of response (CR, PR, and SD) in each treatment arm. According to RECIST 1.1, Complete Response (CR) is disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to <10 mm. Partial Response (PR) is at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. Stable Disease (SD): Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum diameters while on study.
Time Frame
24 months
Title
Median OS
Description
To compare the median OS in each treatment arm.
Time Frame
Up to 40 months
Title
Time-to-new Metastatic Disease in Each Treatment Arm
Description
To compare the time-to-new metastatic disease in each treatment arm, defined from the date of first study agent administration to the onset of a new evaluable site of disease, excluding the primary site and all sites documented at baseline
Time Frame
36 months
Title
Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events
Description
To assess toxicities associated with everolimus or sunitinib using NCI CTC version 4.0 criteria
Time Frame
24 months
Title
Change in Quality-of-life
Description
To compare change in quality-of-life, as measured by the FACT-KSI scale at baseline and cycle 3 day 1 per subject in each treatment arm. Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Kidney Symptom Index. FKSI is a questionnaire for FACT-Kidney Symptom Index used to assess QoL/participant-reported outcomes for participants diagnosed with renal cell cancer. The FKSI contained 15 questions each ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much) so that FKSI ranged between 0-60 where higher scores reflects better functioning and fewer symptoms.
Time Frame
baseline, cycle 3 day 1
Title
Change in Quality-of-life
Description
To compare change in quality-of-life, as measured by the FACT-KSI scale at baseline and cycle 6 day1 per subject in each treatment arm. Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Kidney Symptom Index. FKSI is a questionnaire for FACT-Kidney Symptom Index used to assess QoL/participant-reported outcomes for participants diagnosed with renal cell cancer. The FKSI contained 15 questions each ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much) so that FKSI ranged between 0-60 where higher scores reflects better functioning and fewer symptoms.
Time Frame
baseline, cycle 6 day 1
Title
Change in Quality-of-life
Description
To compare change in quality-of-life, as measured by the FACT-KSI scale at baseline and end of treatment per subject in each treatment arm. Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Kidney Symptom Index. FKSI is a questionnaire for FACT-Kidney Symptom Index used to assess QoL/participant-reported outcomes for participants diagnosed with renal cell cancer. The FKSI contained 15 questions each ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much) so that FKSI ranged between 0-60 where higher scores reflects better functioning and fewer symptoms.
Time Frame
baseline, up to 40 months
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
Clinical Measures of Response and PFS With Baseline and Time-dependent Levels of Biomarkers
Description
To correlate clinical measures of response and PFS with baseline and time-dependent levels of biomarkers. These biomarkers include plasma angiokine levels, tissue immunohistochemical and genomic profiles, copy number as assessed by array-based comparative genomic hybridization (CGH), and known mutations in non-clear cell RCC
Time Frame
36 months
Title
Changes in Copy Number, RNA Expression, and Immunohistochemical Profiles
Description
To evaluate in an exploratory fashion changes in copy number, RNA expression, and immunohistochemical profiles by microarray between primary non-clear cell RCC tumors and metastatic samples
Time Frame
36 months
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Histologically confirmed advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC), with non-clear cell pathology.
RCC tumor tissue available for correlative sciences, from either primary or metastatic site or both.
At the time of screening, at least 4 weeks since prior palliative radiation therapy and/or major surgery, and resolution of all toxic effects of prior therapy to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE; version 4.0) Grade 1.
Subject must have radiographic evidence of metastatic disease with at least 1 measurable per RECIST 1.1 criteria (Attachment 1)].
Age > 18 years.
Adequate laboratory values
Karnofsky Performance Status ≥ 60 (Attachment 2).
Life expectancy of at least 3 months.
Written, signed, dated, and witnessed Institutional Review Board (IRB) or Institutional Ethics Committee (IEC) approved informed consent form (ICF) before any screening procedures are performed.
Exclusion Criteria:
Subjects with a history of or active central nervous system (CNS) metastases.
Prior systemic therapy for RCC, including mTOR and anti-angiogenic therapy, chemotherapy, biologic or experimental therapy.
Subjects with collecting duct, medullary, small cell, oncocytoma, or lymphoma-type pathology.
Subjects receiving known strong CYP3A4 isoenzyme inhibitors and/or inducers.
Major surgery, open biopsy, traumatic injury, or radiotherapy within 4 weeks of the screening visit.
Subjects who have not recovered from prior biopsy, surgery, traumatic injury, and/or radiation therapy.
Presence of a non-healing wound or ulcer.
Grade 3 hemorrhage within the past month.
Hypertension with systolic blood pressure of >180 mm Hg and/or diastolic pressure >100 mm Hg.
Subjects with American Heart Association (AHA) Class 2-4 heart disease or any history of congestive heart failure with an ejection fraction <50%, or history of unstable angina, myocardial infarction, coronary artery bypass graft, cerebrovascular accident, transient ischemic attack, or pulmonary embolism within 6 months of entry.
Diabetes mellitus with glycosylated hemoglobin A1c (HbgA1c) > 10% despite therapy.
A history of interstitial pneumonitis.
Subjects with active autoimmune disorder(s) being treated with immunosuppressive agents within 4 weeks prior to the screening visit.
Subjects receiving immunosuppressive agents and those with chronic viral/bacterial/fungal illnesses such as human immunodeficiency virus (HIV).
Patients who have receive immunization with attenuated live vaccines within one week of study entry or during study period.
Patients with active infection(s), active antimicrobial therapy or serious intercurrent illness.
History of other prior malignancy in past 5 years.
Pregnant or nursing women.
Major medical/psychiatric illness that, in the investigator's judgment, will substantially increase the risk associated with the subject's participation in this study, including inability to absorb oral medications and history of noncompliance to medical regimens.
Known hypersensitivity to any of the components in everolimus or sunitinib product
Subjects taking agents that significantly prolong the QTc interval are not eligible.
Proteinuria with a spot urine protein/creatinine ratio >2 or 24 hour urine protein >2 grams per 24 hours.
Severely impaired lung function as defined as spirometry and Carbon Monoxide Diffusing Capacity (DLCO) that is 50% of the normal predicted value and/or O2 saturation that is 88% or less at rest on room air.
Advanced liver disease such as cirrhosis or severe hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh class C).
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Andrew Armstrong, MD, ScM
Organizational Affiliation
Duke University
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University of Chicago
City
Chicago
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60637
Country
United States
Facility Name
Indiana University Melvin and Bran Simon Cancer Center
City
Indianapolis
State/Province
Indiana
ZIP/Postal Code
46202
Country
United States
Facility Name
Karmanos Cancer Institute/Wayne State University
City
Detroit
State/Province
Michigan
ZIP/Postal Code
48201
Country
United States
Facility Name
Washington Univ in St. Louis-School of Medicine
City
Saint Louis
State/Province
Missouri
ZIP/Postal Code
63110
Country
United States
Facility Name
Duke Univeristy Medical Center
City
Durham
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27708
Country
United States
Facility Name
Cleveland Clinic
City
Cleveland
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
44195
Country
United States
Facility Name
Oregon Health & Science University
City
Portland
State/Province
Oregon
ZIP/Postal Code
97239
Country
United States
Facility Name
SCRI
City
Nashville
State/Province
Tennessee
ZIP/Postal Code
37203
Country
United States
Facility Name
The Vanderbilt Clinic, Henry-Joyce Cancer Center
City
Nashville
State/Province
Tennessee
ZIP/Postal Code
37212
Country
United States
Facility Name
BC Cancer Agency
City
Vancouver
State/Province
British Columbia
ZIP/Postal Code
V5Z 4E6
Country
Canada
Facility Name
CancerCare Manitoba, Med Onc, Dept Hem and Onc
City
Winnipeg
State/Province
Manitoba
ZIP/Postal Code
R3E 0V9
Country
Canada
Facility Name
London Health Sciences Center
City
London
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
N6A-4L6
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Cambridge Cancer Trials Centre
City
Cambridge
State/Province
England
ZIP/Postal Code
CB2 0QQ
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
The Royal Marsden NHS
City
London
State/Province
England
ZIP/Postal Code
8W3 6JJ
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
The Christie Hospital NHS
City
Manchester
State/Province
England
ZIP/Postal Code
M20 4BX
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Weston Park Hospital
City
Sheffield
State/Province
England
ZIP/Postal Code
S10 2SJ
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Churchill Hospital
City
Headington
State/Province
Oxford
ZIP/Postal Code
OX3 7LJ
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Beatson West Scotland Cancer Centre
City
Glasgow
State/Province
Scottland
ZIP/Postal Code
G12 0YN
Country
United Kingdom
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
26794930
Citation
Armstrong AJ, Halabi S, Eisen T, Broderick S, Stadler WM, Jones RJ, Garcia JA, Vaishampayan UN, Picus J, Hawkins RE, Hainsworth JD, Kollmannsberger CK, Logan TF, Puzanov I, Pickering LM, Ryan CW, Protheroe A, Lusk CM, Oberg S, George DJ. Everolimus versus sunitinib for patients with metastatic non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ASPEN): a multicentre, open-label, randomised phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016 Mar;17(3):378-388. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00515-X. Epub 2016 Jan 13.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
23228299
Citation
Winquist E, Rodrigues G. Open clinical uro-oncology trials in Canada. Can J Urol. 2012 Dec;19(6):6587-91. No abstract available.
Results Reference
derived
Learn more about this trial
Phase II Study of Afinitor vs. Sutent in Patients With Metastatic Non-Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs