Comparison of Iodine + Isopropyl Alcohol Versus Iodine + Antimicrobial Sealant for Skin Preparation
Primary Purpose
Surgical Site Infection
Status
Unknown status
Phase
Phase 4
Locations
Mexico
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
2-octyl cyanoacrylate [InteguSEAL®]
Iodine povacrylex in isopropyl alcohol [Duraprep®, 3M]
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional prevention trial for Surgical Site Infection focused on measuring Surgical site infection, Skin preparation, Cost analysis
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients >= 18 years undergoing elective clean or clean-contaminated breast, gynecologic or digestive tract surgery
- Accepts to participate and signs the informed consent form
- Have a telephone number to be contacted after surgery
Exclusion Criteria:
- Previous allergy to one of the study products
- Two or more procedures in different anatomical sites at the same time / surgery (v.g. hysterectomy and mastectomy)
- Pregnancy
- Breast feeding
- Contaminated or infected surgeries
Sites / Locations
- National Institute of CancerologyRecruiting
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Active Comparator
Arm Label
2-octyl cyanoacrylate
iodine povacrylex in isopropyl alcohol
Arm Description
As recommended, povidone iodine is used for skin antisepsis. After drying, a layer of cyanoacrylate is applied on the skin surface with the purpose of immobilizing skin bacteria.
Iodine povacrylex in isopropyl alcohol (Duraprep 3M) This is considered a standard of care in our hospital as many other institutions. It's efficacy and safety have been demonstrated.
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Surgical site infection
Patients we'll be followed prospectively by direct observation to evaluate if a surgical infection occurs. After 30 days of follow-up, patients will be classified as having or not a surgical site infection using the CDC criteria.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Cost analysis
We'll be doing a cost-efectiveness analysis at the end of the study considering the treatment arm, complications developed from surgery to end of follow-up and costs for its treatment.
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT01110772
First Posted
April 23, 2010
Last Updated
April 26, 2010
Sponsor
National Institute of Cancerología
Collaborators
Kimberly-Clark de México
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01110772
Brief Title
Comparison of Iodine + Isopropyl Alcohol Versus Iodine + Antimicrobial Sealant for Skin Preparation
Official Title
Comparative Study of a Iodine + Cyanoacrylate (Integuseal) vs. Iodine and Isopropyl Alcohol in Skin Preparation for Prevention of Surgical Site Infections in Oncologic Surgery
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
April 2010
Overall Recruitment Status
Unknown status
Study Start Date
May 2009 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
October 2010 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
December 2010 (Anticipated)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Name of the Sponsor
National Institute of Cancerología
Collaborators
Kimberly-Clark de México
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The purpose if this study is to determine whether a microbial sealant (iodine + cyanoacrylate) [InteguSEAL®, Kimberly-Clark] reduces surgical site infections when compared to iodine and isopropyl alcohol (povacrylex in isopropyl alcohol) [Duraprep®] in oncologic surgery.
Detailed Description
Patient's skin flora is a major source of pathogens, and microbial contamination of the surgical site is a likely precursor of SSI. A variety of skin products may be used, including iodophors, alcohol-containing products, and clorhexidine gluconate. Despite these perioperative tactics, bacteria continue to survive at the skin level and migrate to contaminate the wound.
A microbial sealant (InteguSEAL®, Kimberly-Clark) that uses cyanoacrylate to seal endogenous skin flora has demonstrated to reduce wound contamination. The efficacy of the microbial sealant in preventing SSI has been tested in cardiovascular surgery and open inguinal hernia repair, with a reduction on SSI rate when compared to standard skin preparations. This cyanoacrylate has not been tested in oncologic surgeries.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Surgical Site Infection
Keywords
Surgical site infection, Skin preparation, Cost analysis
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Prevention
Study Phase
Phase 4
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
1200 (Anticipated)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
2-octyl cyanoacrylate
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
As recommended, povidone iodine is used for skin antisepsis. After drying, a layer of cyanoacrylate is applied on the skin surface with the purpose of immobilizing skin bacteria.
Arm Title
iodine povacrylex in isopropyl alcohol
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Iodine povacrylex in isopropyl alcohol (Duraprep 3M) This is considered a standard of care in our hospital as many other institutions. It's efficacy and safety have been demonstrated.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
2-octyl cyanoacrylate [InteguSEAL®]
Other Intervention Name(s)
InteguSEAL® (Kimberly Clark)
Intervention Description
At operating room arrival prior to surgery, povidone-iodine is applied on the skin surface on concentric circles as recommended; after drying, the cyanoacrylate device is opened and a layer of the sealant is applied on the incision and skin site(IS100 for patients undergoing mastectomy, and IS200 for patients undergoing gynecologic or digestive tract surgeries).
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Iodine povacrylex in isopropyl alcohol [Duraprep®, 3M]
Other Intervention Name(s)
Duraprep® (3M)
Intervention Description
At the operating room arrival a few minutes before the incision, cleansing and skin antisepsis is done with the prefilled device with iodine povacrylex in isopropyl alcohol as recommended by 3M.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Surgical site infection
Description
Patients we'll be followed prospectively by direct observation to evaluate if a surgical infection occurs. After 30 days of follow-up, patients will be classified as having or not a surgical site infection using the CDC criteria.
Time Frame
30-45 days
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Cost analysis
Description
We'll be doing a cost-efectiveness analysis at the end of the study considering the treatment arm, complications developed from surgery to end of follow-up and costs for its treatment.
Time Frame
30-45 days
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Patients >= 18 years undergoing elective clean or clean-contaminated breast, gynecologic or digestive tract surgery
Accepts to participate and signs the informed consent form
Have a telephone number to be contacted after surgery
Exclusion Criteria:
Previous allergy to one of the study products
Two or more procedures in different anatomical sites at the same time / surgery (v.g. hysterectomy and mastectomy)
Pregnancy
Breast feeding
Contaminated or infected surgeries
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Diana Vilar-Compte, MD, MsC
Phone
+52 555 628 0400
Ext
262
Email
parakalomx@yahoo.com.mx
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Diana Vilar-Compte, MD;MsC
Organizational Affiliation
Instituto Nacional de Cancerologia, Columbia
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
National Institute of Cancerology
City
Mexico City
State/Province
DF
ZIP/Postal Code
14080
Country
Mexico
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Diana Vilar-Compte, MD, MsC
Phone
+52 555 628 0400
Ext
262
Email
parakalomx@yahoo.com.mx
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Learn more about this trial
Comparison of Iodine + Isopropyl Alcohol Versus Iodine + Antimicrobial Sealant for Skin Preparation
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs