search
Back to results

A Study of Tocilizumab (RoActemra/Actemra) Versus Adalimumab in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis

Primary Purpose

Rheumatoid Arthritis

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 4
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Tocilizumab
Adalimumab
Placebo to tocilizumab
Placebo to adalimumab
Sponsored by
Hoffmann-La Roche
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Rheumatoid Arthritis

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult patients, ≥ 18 years of age.
  • Rheumatoid arthritis of > 6 months duration.
  • Intolerant of methotrexate or continued treatment with methotrexate is considered inappropriate.
  • All disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARD) are to be withdrawn prior to receiving study drug.
  • Weight ≤ 150 kg.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Major surgery (including joint surgery) within 12 weeks prior to baseline or planned major surgery within 6 months after baseline.
  • History of or current inflammatory joint disease other than rheumatoid arthritis (RA).
  • Treatment with a biologic agent at any time prior to baseline.
  • Intra-articular or parenteral corticosteroids ≤ 4 weeks prior to baseline.
  • Active current infection or history of recurrent bacterial, viral, fungal or mycobacterial infection.

Sites / Locations

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg

Adalimumab 40 mg

Arm Description

Patients received 6 infusions of tocilizumab 8 mg/kg intravenously every 4 weeks and 12 injections of placebo to adalimumab subcutaneously every 2 weeks.

Patients received 12 injections of adalimumab 40 mg subcutaneously every 2 weeks and 6 infusions of placebo to tocilizumab intravenously every 4 weeks.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Change From Baseline to Week 24 in the Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28)
The DAS28 is a combined index for measuring disease activity in rheumatic arthritis (RA) and includes swollen and tender joint counts, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and general health (GH) status. The index is calculated with the following formula: DAS28 = (0.56 × √(TJC28)) + (0.28 × √(SJC28)) + (0.7 × log(ESR)) + (0.014 × GH), where TJC28 = tender joint count and SJC28 = swollen joint count, each on 28 joints. GH = a patient's global assessment of disease activity in the previous 24 hours on a 100 mm visual analog scale (left end = no disease activity [symptom-free and no arthritis symptoms], right end = maximum disease activity [maximum arthritis disease activity]). When ESR equaled 0 mm/hr, it was set to 1 mm/hr. The DAS28 scale ranges from 0 to 10, where higher scores represent higher disease activity. A negative change score indicates improvement. The analysis was adjusted for stratification factors of duration of RA (≤ 2 years and > 2 years) and region (US and non-US).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Percentage of Patients With a Remission Response (Disease Activity Score 28 [DAS28] < 2.6) at Week 24
The percentage of patients who achieved remission of their rheumatic arthritis at Week 24, as measured by a DAS28 score < 2.6, is reported.
Percentage of Patients With Low Disease Activity (Disease Activity Score 28 [DAS28] ≤ 3.2) at Week 24
The percentage of patients who had low rheumatic arthritis disease activity at Week 24, as measured by a DAS28 score of 3.2 or less, is reported.
Percentage of Patients With an Improvement of at Least 20%, 50%, or 70% in American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Score (ACR20/50/70) From Baseline at Week 24
Improvement must be seen in tender and swollen joint counts (28 assessed joints) and in at least 3 of the following 5 parameters: Separate patient and physician assessments of patient disease activity in the previous 24 hours on a visual analog scale (VAS, the extreme left end of the line "no disease activity" [symptom-free and no arthritis symptoms] and the extreme right end "maximum disease activity"; patient assessment of pain in previous the 24 hours on a VAS (extreme left end of the line "no pain" and the extreme right end "unbearable pain"); Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (20 questions, 8 components: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and activities, 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do); and erythrocyte sedimentation rate.
Percentage of Patients With a European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Good Response at Week 24
Change of the Disease Activity Score 28 score from baseline was used to determine EULAR responses of good, moderate, or no response. For a post-baseline score ≤ 3.2, a change from baseline of < -1.2 was a good response, < -0.6 to ≥ -1.2 was a moderate response, and ≥ -0.6 was no response. For a post-baseline score > 3.2 to ≤ 5.1, a change from baseline of < -0.6 was a moderate response and ≥ -0.6 was no response. For a post-baseline score > 5.1, a change from baseline < -1.2 was a moderate response and ≥ -1.2 was no response. A good response could not be achieved for post-baseline scores > 3.2.
Percentage of Patients With a European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Good or Moderate Response at Week 24
Change of the Disease Activity Score 28 score from baseline was used to determine EULAR responses of good, moderate, or no response. For a post-baseline score ≤ 3.2, a change from baseline of < -1.2 was a good response, < -0.6 to ≥ -1.2 was a moderate response, and ≥ -0.6 was no response. For a post-baseline score > 3.2 to ≤ 5.1, a change from baseline of < -0.6 was a moderate response and ≥ -0.6 was no response. For a post-baseline score > 5.1, a change from baseline < -1.2 was a moderate response and ≥ -1.2 was no response. A good response could not be achieved for post-baseline scores > 3.2.

Full Information

First Posted
April 1, 2010
Last Updated
January 10, 2013
Sponsor
Hoffmann-La Roche
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01119859
Brief Title
A Study of Tocilizumab (RoActemra/Actemra) Versus Adalimumab in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis
Official Title
A Multi-center, Randomized, Blinded, Parallel-group Study of the Reduction of Signs and Symptoms During Monotherapy Treatment With Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg Intravenously Versus Adalimumab 40 mg Subcutaneously in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
January 2013
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
May 2010 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
January 2012 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
January 2012 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Hoffmann-La Roche

4. Oversight

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This randomized, blinded, parallel arm study evaluated the efficacy and safety of tocilizumab (RoActemra/Actemra) versus adalimumab as monotherapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis who are intolerant of methotrexate or where continued treatment with methotrexate was considered inappropriate. Patients were randomized to receive either tocilizumab 8 mg/kg intravenously (iv) every 4 weeks plus placebo subcutaneously (sc) every 2 weeks, or adalimumab 40 mg sc every 2 weeks plus placebo iv every 4 weeks. Treatment was anticipated to last 24 weeks. With regard to the blind, the study nurse was unblinded due to the nature of the treatment administration, but the investigator and the patient remained blinded.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Rheumatoid Arthritis

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 4
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantInvestigator
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
326 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Patients received 6 infusions of tocilizumab 8 mg/kg intravenously every 4 weeks and 12 injections of placebo to adalimumab subcutaneously every 2 weeks.
Arm Title
Adalimumab 40 mg
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Patients received 12 injections of adalimumab 40 mg subcutaneously every 2 weeks and 6 infusions of placebo to tocilizumab intravenously every 4 weeks.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Tocilizumab
Other Intervention Name(s)
RoActemra, Actemra
Intervention Description
The maximum dose was 800 mg for patients weighing more than 100 kg. Tocilizumab was infused into an arm vein over a 1-hour period.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Adalimumab
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Placebo to tocilizumab
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Placebo to adalimumab
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in the Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28)
Description
The DAS28 is a combined index for measuring disease activity in rheumatic arthritis (RA) and includes swollen and tender joint counts, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and general health (GH) status. The index is calculated with the following formula: DAS28 = (0.56 × √(TJC28)) + (0.28 × √(SJC28)) + (0.7 × log(ESR)) + (0.014 × GH), where TJC28 = tender joint count and SJC28 = swollen joint count, each on 28 joints. GH = a patient's global assessment of disease activity in the previous 24 hours on a 100 mm visual analog scale (left end = no disease activity [symptom-free and no arthritis symptoms], right end = maximum disease activity [maximum arthritis disease activity]). When ESR equaled 0 mm/hr, it was set to 1 mm/hr. The DAS28 scale ranges from 0 to 10, where higher scores represent higher disease activity. A negative change score indicates improvement. The analysis was adjusted for stratification factors of duration of RA (≤ 2 years and > 2 years) and region (US and non-US).
Time Frame
Baseline to Week 24
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Percentage of Patients With a Remission Response (Disease Activity Score 28 [DAS28] < 2.6) at Week 24
Description
The percentage of patients who achieved remission of their rheumatic arthritis at Week 24, as measured by a DAS28 score < 2.6, is reported.
Time Frame
Week 24
Title
Percentage of Patients With Low Disease Activity (Disease Activity Score 28 [DAS28] ≤ 3.2) at Week 24
Description
The percentage of patients who had low rheumatic arthritis disease activity at Week 24, as measured by a DAS28 score of 3.2 or less, is reported.
Time Frame
Week 24
Title
Percentage of Patients With an Improvement of at Least 20%, 50%, or 70% in American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Score (ACR20/50/70) From Baseline at Week 24
Description
Improvement must be seen in tender and swollen joint counts (28 assessed joints) and in at least 3 of the following 5 parameters: Separate patient and physician assessments of patient disease activity in the previous 24 hours on a visual analog scale (VAS, the extreme left end of the line "no disease activity" [symptom-free and no arthritis symptoms] and the extreme right end "maximum disease activity"; patient assessment of pain in previous the 24 hours on a VAS (extreme left end of the line "no pain" and the extreme right end "unbearable pain"); Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (20 questions, 8 components: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and activities, 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do); and erythrocyte sedimentation rate.
Time Frame
Baseline to Week 24
Title
Percentage of Patients With a European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Good Response at Week 24
Description
Change of the Disease Activity Score 28 score from baseline was used to determine EULAR responses of good, moderate, or no response. For a post-baseline score ≤ 3.2, a change from baseline of < -1.2 was a good response, < -0.6 to ≥ -1.2 was a moderate response, and ≥ -0.6 was no response. For a post-baseline score > 3.2 to ≤ 5.1, a change from baseline of < -0.6 was a moderate response and ≥ -0.6 was no response. For a post-baseline score > 5.1, a change from baseline < -1.2 was a moderate response and ≥ -1.2 was no response. A good response could not be achieved for post-baseline scores > 3.2.
Time Frame
Baseline to Week 24
Title
Percentage of Patients With a European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Good or Moderate Response at Week 24
Description
Change of the Disease Activity Score 28 score from baseline was used to determine EULAR responses of good, moderate, or no response. For a post-baseline score ≤ 3.2, a change from baseline of < -1.2 was a good response, < -0.6 to ≥ -1.2 was a moderate response, and ≥ -0.6 was no response. For a post-baseline score > 3.2 to ≤ 5.1, a change from baseline of < -0.6 was a moderate response and ≥ -0.6 was no response. For a post-baseline score > 5.1, a change from baseline < -1.2 was a moderate response and ≥ -1.2 was no response. A good response could not be achieved for post-baseline scores > 3.2.
Time Frame
Baseline to Week 24

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Adult patients, ≥ 18 years of age. Rheumatoid arthritis of > 6 months duration. Intolerant of methotrexate or continued treatment with methotrexate is considered inappropriate. All disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARD) are to be withdrawn prior to receiving study drug. Weight ≤ 150 kg. Exclusion Criteria: Major surgery (including joint surgery) within 12 weeks prior to baseline or planned major surgery within 6 months after baseline. History of or current inflammatory joint disease other than rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Treatment with a biologic agent at any time prior to baseline. Intra-articular or parenteral corticosteroids ≤ 4 weeks prior to baseline. Active current infection or history of recurrent bacterial, viral, fungal or mycobacterial infection.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Clinical Trials
Organizational Affiliation
Hoffmann-La Roche
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
City
Aniston
State/Province
Alabama
ZIP/Postal Code
36207
Country
United States
City
Birmingham
State/Province
Alabama
ZIP/Postal Code
35294
Country
United States
City
Scottsdale
State/Province
Arizona
ZIP/Postal Code
85258
Country
United States
City
Hot Springs
State/Province
Arkansas
ZIP/Postal Code
71913
Country
United States
City
Little Rock
State/Province
Arkansas
ZIP/Postal Code
72205
Country
United States
City
San Diego
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92108
Country
United States
City
Colorado Springs
State/Province
Colorado
ZIP/Postal Code
80910
Country
United States
City
Trumbull
State/Province
Connecticut
ZIP/Postal Code
06611
Country
United States
City
Boca Raton
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33486
Country
United States
City
Fort Lauderdale
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33334
Country
United States
City
Ormond Beach
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
32174
Country
United States
City
Idaho Falls
State/Province
Idaho
ZIP/Postal Code
83404
Country
United States
City
Springfield
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
62704
Country
United States
City
Cumberland
State/Province
Maryland
ZIP/Postal Code
21502
Country
United States
City
Flowood
State/Province
Mississippi
ZIP/Postal Code
39232
Country
United States
City
Tupelo
State/Province
Mississippi
ZIP/Postal Code
38802
Country
United States
City
Lincoln
State/Province
Nebraska
ZIP/Postal Code
68516
Country
United States
City
Dover
State/Province
New Hampshire
ZIP/Postal Code
03820
Country
United States
City
New Brunswick
State/Province
New Jersey
ZIP/Postal Code
08903
Country
United States
City
Hickory
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
28601
Country
United States
City
Dayton
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
45402
Country
United States
City
Duncansville
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
16635
Country
United States
City
Willow Grove
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
19090
Country
United States
City
Wyomissing
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
19610
Country
United States
City
Greenville
State/Province
South Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
29601
Country
United States
City
Hixson
State/Province
Tennessee
ZIP/Postal Code
37343
Country
United States
City
Houston
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
77074
Country
United States
City
Lubbock
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
79424
Country
United States
City
Mesquite
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
75150
Country
United States
City
Nassau Bay
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
77058
Country
United States
City
Waco
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
76708
Country
United States
City
Spokane
State/Province
Washington
ZIP/Postal Code
99204
Country
United States
City
Tacoma
State/Province
Washington
ZIP/Postal Code
98405
Country
United States
City
Maroochydore
ZIP/Postal Code
4558
Country
Australia
City
Sydney
ZIP/Postal Code
2050
Country
Australia
City
Bruxelles
ZIP/Postal Code
1070
Country
Belgium
City
Liege
ZIP/Postal Code
4000
Country
Belgium
City
Curitiba
ZIP/Postal Code
80060-240
Country
Brazil
City
Goiania
ZIP/Postal Code
74110010
Country
Brazil
City
Sao Paulo
ZIP/Postal Code
04266-010
Country
Brazil
City
Prague
ZIP/Postal Code
12850
Country
Czech Republic
City
Helsinki
ZIP/Postal Code
00290
Country
Finland
City
Jyväskylä
ZIP/Postal Code
40100
Country
Finland
City
Baden-baden
ZIP/Postal Code
76530
Country
Germany
City
Berlin
ZIP/Postal Code
14059
Country
Germany
City
Essen
ZIP/Postal Code
45239
Country
Germany
City
Heidelberg
ZIP/Postal Code
69120
Country
Germany
City
Herne
ZIP/Postal Code
44652
Country
Germany
City
Hildesheim
ZIP/Postal Code
31134
Country
Germany
City
Köln
ZIP/Postal Code
50924
Country
Germany
City
Osnabrück
ZIP/Postal Code
49074
Country
Germany
City
Ratingen
ZIP/Postal Code
40882
Country
Germany
City
Würzburg
ZIP/Postal Code
97080
Country
Germany
City
Athens
ZIP/Postal Code
11527
Country
Greece
City
Heraklion
ZIP/Postal Code
71110
Country
Greece
City
Thessaloniki
ZIP/Postal Code
54642
Country
Greece
City
Mexicali
ZIP/Postal Code
21100
Country
Mexico
City
Mexico, Df
ZIP/Postal Code
11850
Country
Mexico
City
Obregon
ZIP/Postal Code
85000
Country
Mexico
City
Almada
ZIP/Postal Code
2801-951
Country
Portugal
City
Lisboa
ZIP/Postal Code
1649-035
Country
Portugal
City
Porto
ZIP/Postal Code
4200-319
Country
Portugal
City
Barcelona
ZIP/Postal Code
08036
Country
Spain
City
La Coruna
ZIP/Postal Code
15006
Country
Spain
City
Madrid
ZIP/Postal Code
28006
Country
Spain
City
Santiago de Compostela
ZIP/Postal Code
15705
Country
Spain
City
Sevilla
ZIP/Postal Code
41009
Country
Spain
City
Stockholm
ZIP/Postal Code
17176
Country
Sweden
City
Uppsala
ZIP/Postal Code
751 85
Country
Sweden
City
Aarau
ZIP/Postal Code
5000
Country
Switzerland
City
Genève
ZIP/Postal Code
1211
Country
Switzerland
City
Lausanne
ZIP/Postal Code
1011
Country
Switzerland
City
St. Gallen
ZIP/Postal Code
9007
Country
Switzerland
City
Zürich
ZIP/Postal Code
8091
Country
Switzerland
City
Ankara
ZIP/Postal Code
06100
Country
Turkey
City
Antalya
ZIP/Postal Code
07059
Country
Turkey
City
Istanbul
ZIP/Postal Code
34098
Country
Turkey
City
Cannock
ZIP/Postal Code
WS11 5XY
Country
United Kingdom
City
Leeds
ZIP/Postal Code
LS7 4SA
Country
United Kingdom
City
London
ZIP/Postal Code
E11 1NR
Country
United Kingdom
City
Newcastle Upon Tyne
ZIP/Postal Code
NE1 4LP
Country
United Kingdom
City
Poole
ZIP/Postal Code
BH15 2JB
Country
United Kingdom

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
28955499
Citation
Strand V, Michalska M, Birchwood C, Pei J, Tuckwell K, Finch R, Gabay C, Kavanaugh A, Jones G. Impact of tocilizumab monotherapy on patient-reported outcomes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis from two randomised controlled trials. RMD Open. 2017 Sep 14;3(2):e000496. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2017-000496. eCollection 2017.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
26613768
Citation
Gabay C, McInnes IB, Kavanaugh A, Tuckwell K, Klearman M, Pulley J, Sattar N. Comparison of lipid and lipid-associated cardiovascular risk marker changes after treatment with tocilizumab or adalimumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2016 Oct;75(10):1806-12. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-207872. Epub 2015 Nov 27.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
25167216
Citation
Dennis G Jr, Holweg CT, Kummerfeld SK, Choy DF, Setiadi AF, Hackney JA, Haverty PM, Gilbert H, Lin WY, Diehl L, Fischer S, Song A, Musselman D, Klearman M, Gabay C, Kavanaugh A, Endres J, Fox DA, Martin F, Townsend MJ. Synovial phenotypes in rheumatoid arthritis correlate with response to biologic therapeutics. Arthritis Res Ther. 2014;16(2):R90. doi: 10.1186/ar4555. Epub 2014 Apr 30.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
23515142
Citation
Gabay C, Emery P, van Vollenhoven R, Dikranian A, Alten R, Pavelka K, Klearman M, Musselman D, Agarwal S, Green J, Kavanaugh A; ADACTA Study Investigators. Tocilizumab monotherapy versus adalimumab monotherapy for treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (ADACTA): a randomised, double-blind, controlled phase 4 trial. Lancet. 2013 May 4;381(9877):1541-50. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60250-0. Epub 2013 Mar 18. Erratum In: Lancet. 2013 Dec 7;382(9908):1878. Lancet. 2013 May 4;381(9877):1540. Dosage error in article text.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

A Study of Tocilizumab (RoActemra/Actemra) Versus Adalimumab in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs