search
Back to results

Study of Effect of Exercise With Osteoporosis and Vertebral Fracture

Primary Purpose

Osteoporosis, Vertebral Fracture

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Norway
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Exercise group
Control Group
Sponsored by
Ostfold Hospital Trust
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Osteoporosis focused on measuring randomized controlled trial, osteoporosis, moderate-intensity circuit exercises, balance, health-related quality of life

Eligibility Criteria

60 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)FemaleDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • women
  • living at home
  • ambulatory
  • aged 60 or more
  • clinical diagnosis of osteoporosis
  • a history of vertebral fracture

Exclusion Criteria:

  • recent vertebral fractures
  • unable to complete the questionnaires
  • major cognitive impairment (MMSE) ( MMS < 23 )

Sites / Locations

  • Ostfold Hospital Trust

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Other

Arm Label

Exercise group

Control Group

Arm Description

Exercise group with intervention Subjects in the intervention group must participate in a training course consisted of 24 sessions over 3 months. The exercises include aerobic, stretching, balance and functional training, i.e. circuit exercises focus been on: the prevention of falls and fractures, improving balance and coordination, improving posture, and informing subjects about risk factors for falls and for osteoporosis and fractures. A 3-hour session of information and supervision will be hold for the intervention group by the same physiotherapist who leads the training sessions. The focus is on body awareness and ergonomic advice in specific, daily-life situations (e.g. lifting/carrying, resting positions).

Control group with no intervention Subjects in the control group are asked to maintain their current lifestyle. No restrictions are placed on their exercise activities. The control group is followed for the same duration as the intervention group.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Time Used to Walk 20 m at Maximal Speed.
Times (measured in seconds) used walking at maximum speed for 20m indoors. No acceleration or deceleration phase used. The type of walking aids used during the test will be recorded. The participants walk as fast as possible wearing their ordinary shoes. The test perform once, the time measured with a stopwatch and the time used on 20 m will be recorded

Secondary Outcome Measures

Timed Up & Go Test (TUG)
The subject will be instructed to rise from a chair with a seat height of 43 cm, walk 3 m, turn around, return and sit down again, wearing ordinary footwear and use customary walking aids if necessary.
Functional Reach
The maximum distance in centimetres that can be reached forward in a standing position while maintaining a fixed base of support. Subjects will be instructed to stand sideways against a wall in a natural position and stretch one arm forward level with the shoulder. The position of the third metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joint was taken as the zero point. With the body tilted forward as far as possible, the subjects continued to stretch the arm parallel to the ground. Amount of cm indicate better balance.
QUALEFFO 41
Quality of Life Questionnaire issued by the European Foundation for Osteoporosis (QUALEFFO-41), is a disease-specific questionnaire to be used by patients with vertebral fractures attributed to osteoporosis. QUALEFFO-41 is self-administered and contains questions in five domains: pain, ability to perform physical functions, social functioning, general health perception and mental performance. These five domains can be evaluated individually or be represented in a total score. All scores in all the domains are expressed in values ranging from 0-100, where 0 represents the best and 100 the worst. The total QALEFFO score is calculated as a sum of all answers to items and then linearly transformed on the scale 0-100. High scores indicate poor quality of life.
General Health Questionnaire 20 (GHQ20).
GHQ-20 is a generic instrument and registers distress and psychopathology. GHQ-20 is self-administered and the answers to each item may be treated as a "Likert Scale" and have weights assigned to each position (0-1-2-3) where 0 is no distress, and 3 is severe distress. This gives a possible range for the total GHQ-20 score of 0-60. Higher scores indicating poor qol.
Falls-Efficacy Scale-International
A 16- item self report or interview- based questionnaire assessing the fear of falling during basic and more demanding activities of daily living (Yardley et al. 2005). Each item is scored on a four point scale. Minimun score indicating low concern about falling is 16. The maximun score indication high concern about falling is 64.

Full Information

First Posted
May 6, 2010
Last Updated
September 26, 2016
Sponsor
Ostfold Hospital Trust
Collaborators
Norwegian Fund for Postgraduate Training in Physiotherapy
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01120197
Brief Title
Study of Effect of Exercise With Osteoporosis and Vertebral Fracture
Official Title
Study of Effect of Exercise on Health-related Quality of Life, Mobility and Balance in Osteoporotic Women With a History of Vertebral Fracture.
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
September 2016
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
May 2005 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
January 2009 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
November 2009 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Ostfold Hospital Trust
Collaborators
Norwegian Fund for Postgraduate Training in Physiotherapy

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The aim of this randomized controlled trial is to evaluate the effectiveness for health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of a 3-month course of exercises for a group of postmenopausal women with osteoporosis who has at least one vertebral fracture versus a control group (undertaking their usual activities). The course of exercises is devised in accordance with methods recommended in "Rehabilitation treatment guidelines in postmenopausal and senile osteoporosis".
Detailed Description
Public health policies in most European countries are concerned with how to keep older people living independently with a qualitatively good life in the community as long as possible. Apart from its personal and human cost, osteoporosis is a major public health problem, which has an enormous social and economic impact. Osteoporosis(OP) is a common condition among older people,and a non-fatal condition that leads more to changes in the quality of life than to change in the length of life. Osteoporosis is a skeletal disorder characterized by decreased bone mass. The World Health Organization (WHO) Study Group on Osteoporosis has defined osteoporosis as "a hip BMD level of more than 2.5 SDs below the mean BMD for young, white, adult women". Using the WHO definition, approximately 30% of postmenopausal women have osteoporosis. The most common consequences of osteoporosis are fractures. Furthermore the most common conditions associated with osteoporosis are back pain, limitations in physical functioning, and psychosocial impairment. Thus, the purpose of this study is to record the effect of the programme on mobility, balance, the disease-specific and generic health-related quality of life for women with osteoporosis and a history of vertebral fractures. The programme consist of a three-hour educational session and a three-month course of exercises in accordance with guidelines for women with an increased risk of falls and postmenopausal osteoporotic women with a history of fractures. Our hypothesis that a three-month course of exercises and a three-hour lesson on how to cope with osteoporosis will have a significantly positive effect on the generic and disease-specific quality of life, as well as the balance and mobility, of elderly (≥60 years) women with postmenopausal osteoporosis and a history of vertebral fractures, both 3 months after the intervention and after one year. The sample would be recruited from the Osteoporosis Outpatient clinic at the Ostfold Hospital, Norway and they their body mineral density (BMD) has been measured using Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry (DXA). The design of the study is a randomized controlled trial and the sample would be randomized to an intervention group or a control group. Subjects in the control group are asked to maintain their current lifestyle. No restrictions are placed on their exercise activities. Subjects in the intervention group must participate in a training course consisted of 24 sessions over 3 months. The exercises include aerobic, stretching, balance and functional training, i.e. circuit exercises focus been on: the prevention of falls and fractures, improving balance and coordination, improving posture, and informing subjects about risk factors for falls and for osteoporosis and fractures. A 3-hour session of information and supervision will be hold for the intervention group by the same physiotherapist who leads the training sessions. The focus is on body awareness and ergonomic advice in specific, daily-life situations (e.g. lifting/carrying, resting positions).

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Osteoporosis, Vertebral Fracture
Keywords
randomized controlled trial, osteoporosis, moderate-intensity circuit exercises, balance, health-related quality of life

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Outcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
89 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Exercise group
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Exercise group with intervention Subjects in the intervention group must participate in a training course consisted of 24 sessions over 3 months. The exercises include aerobic, stretching, balance and functional training, i.e. circuit exercises focus been on: the prevention of falls and fractures, improving balance and coordination, improving posture, and informing subjects about risk factors for falls and for osteoporosis and fractures. A 3-hour session of information and supervision will be hold for the intervention group by the same physiotherapist who leads the training sessions. The focus is on body awareness and ergonomic advice in specific, daily-life situations (e.g. lifting/carrying, resting positions).
Arm Title
Control Group
Arm Type
Other
Arm Description
Control group with no intervention Subjects in the control group are asked to maintain their current lifestyle. No restrictions are placed on their exercise activities. The control group is followed for the same duration as the intervention group.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Exercise group
Intervention Description
Weekly exercises
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Control Group
Intervention Description
No Intervention, control group only
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Time Used to Walk 20 m at Maximal Speed.
Description
Times (measured in seconds) used walking at maximum speed for 20m indoors. No acceleration or deceleration phase used. The type of walking aids used during the test will be recorded. The participants walk as fast as possible wearing their ordinary shoes. The test perform once, the time measured with a stopwatch and the time used on 20 m will be recorded
Time Frame
At baseline, 3 and 12 months after the baseline
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Timed Up & Go Test (TUG)
Description
The subject will be instructed to rise from a chair with a seat height of 43 cm, walk 3 m, turn around, return and sit down again, wearing ordinary footwear and use customary walking aids if necessary.
Time Frame
At baseline, 3 and 12 months after the baseline.
Title
Functional Reach
Description
The maximum distance in centimetres that can be reached forward in a standing position while maintaining a fixed base of support. Subjects will be instructed to stand sideways against a wall in a natural position and stretch one arm forward level with the shoulder. The position of the third metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joint was taken as the zero point. With the body tilted forward as far as possible, the subjects continued to stretch the arm parallel to the ground. Amount of cm indicate better balance.
Time Frame
At baseline, 3 and 12 months after the baseline
Title
QUALEFFO 41
Description
Quality of Life Questionnaire issued by the European Foundation for Osteoporosis (QUALEFFO-41), is a disease-specific questionnaire to be used by patients with vertebral fractures attributed to osteoporosis. QUALEFFO-41 is self-administered and contains questions in five domains: pain, ability to perform physical functions, social functioning, general health perception and mental performance. These five domains can be evaluated individually or be represented in a total score. All scores in all the domains are expressed in values ranging from 0-100, where 0 represents the best and 100 the worst. The total QALEFFO score is calculated as a sum of all answers to items and then linearly transformed on the scale 0-100. High scores indicate poor quality of life.
Time Frame
At baseline, 3 and 12 months after the baseline
Title
General Health Questionnaire 20 (GHQ20).
Description
GHQ-20 is a generic instrument and registers distress and psychopathology. GHQ-20 is self-administered and the answers to each item may be treated as a "Likert Scale" and have weights assigned to each position (0-1-2-3) where 0 is no distress, and 3 is severe distress. This gives a possible range for the total GHQ-20 score of 0-60. Higher scores indicating poor qol.
Time Frame
At baseline, 3 and 12 months after baseline
Title
Falls-Efficacy Scale-International
Description
A 16- item self report or interview- based questionnaire assessing the fear of falling during basic and more demanding activities of daily living (Yardley et al. 2005). Each item is scored on a four point scale. Minimun score indicating low concern about falling is 16. The maximun score indication high concern about falling is 64.
Time Frame
Baseline, 3 months follow-up, 12 months follow up

10. Eligibility

Sex
Female
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
60 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: women living at home ambulatory aged 60 or more clinical diagnosis of osteoporosis a history of vertebral fracture Exclusion Criteria: recent vertebral fractures unable to complete the questionnaires major cognitive impairment (MMSE) ( MMS < 23 )
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Astrid Bergland, Professor
Organizational Affiliation
Faculty of Health Science, University of Oslo, Norway
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Ostfold Hospital Trust
City
Sarpsborg
ZIP/Postal Code
1703
Country
Norway

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No

Learn more about this trial

Study of Effect of Exercise With Osteoporosis and Vertebral Fracture

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs