search
Back to results

Safety and Tolerability of Aripiprazole in Adolescents With Schizophrenia or Children and Adolescents With Bipolar I Disorder, Manic or Mixed Episode With or Without Psychotic Features. (ATTAIN 267)

Primary Purpose

Adolescent Schizophrenia, Child or Adolescent Bipolar I Disorder, Manic or Mixed Episode With or Without Psychotic Features

Status
Terminated
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Aripiprazole
Sponsored by
Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc.
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Adolescent Schizophrenia focused on measuring schizophrenia, adolescent, bipolar

Eligibility Criteria

10 Years - 17 Years (Child)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects 13-17 years old (Schizophrenia); Subjects 10-17 years old (Bipolar manic or mixed episode)* [*Bulgaria will enroll Schizophrenia subjects only.]
  • Subjects with a current diagnosis of schizophrenia, and a history of the illness (diagnosis or symptoms) for at least 6 months prior to screening (as per subject, family, or healthcare provider, or by previous medical records).
  • Subjects with a current diagnosis of bipolar I disorder, manic or mixed episode with or without psychotic features (diagnosis or symptoms) experiencing symptoms for at least 1 week prior to screening. * [*These subjects will not be eligible to enroll in Bulgaria]
  • Subjects who have shown previous response to antipsychotic treatment (other than clozapine) and are not resistant to treatment with other antipsychotics.
  • Subjects who are currently being treated with oral antipsychotics other than clozapine, and are not resistant to treatment with other antipsychotics.
  • Inpatient or outpatient status, with the exception of acute hospitalization due to psychiatric reasons at the time of screening or before Phase 2.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • All subjects: diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder, autism, pervasive developmental disorder (PDD), OCD, or PTSD.
  • Subjects with schizophrenia: a current major depressive episode.
  • Subjects with bipolar manic or mixed episode: presenting with a clinical picture and/or history that is consistent with a diagnosis of bipolar II disorder or bipolar disorder not otherwise specified.
  • Subjects with delirium, dementia, amnesia or other cognitive disorders; subjects with psychotic symptoms that are better accounted for by another general medical condition(s) or direct effect of a substance (i.e., medication, illicit drug use, etc.).
  • Subjects with any neurological disorder, with the exception of Tourette's syndrome.
  • Subjects experiencing major depressive episode at the time of screening other than subjects diagnosed with bipolar I disorder mixed episode.
  • Subjects who are currently receiving clozapine or have received clozapine at any time in the past are ineligible for entry into the study.
  • Subjects who meet the DSM-IV-TR criteria for substance dependence (including alcohol and benzodiazepines, but excluding caffeine and nicotine) within the past 180 days prior to screening.
  • Subjects who have epilepsy, a history of seizures (except for a single childhood febrile seizure or post-traumatic seizure), or a history of severe head trauma or stroke, or have a history or current evidence of other unstable medical conditions.
  • Subjects with a history of subclinical hypothyroidism (TSH ≥ 4.0 mIU/L), known hypothyroidism, or hyperthyroidism (unless the condition has been stabilized with medications for at least 90 days prior to entry into Phase 1 or Phase 2).
  • Subjects who have a medical history of uncontrolled diabetes, labile or unstable diabetes (brittle diabetes), newly diagnosed diabetes, or clinically significant abnormal blood glucose levels (defined as fasting blood glucose ≥ 125 mg/dL).

Sites / Locations

  • Study Site
  • Study Site
  • Study Site
  • Study Site
  • Study Site
  • Study Site
  • Study Site
  • Study Site
  • Study Site
  • Study Site
  • Study Site
  • Study Site
  • Study Site
  • Study Site
  • Study Site
  • Study Site
  • Study Site
  • Study Site
  • Study Site
  • Study Site
  • Study Site
  • Study Site
  • Study Site
  • Study Site
  • Study Site
  • Study Site
  • Study Site
  • Study Site 2
  • Study Site
  • Study Site 1
  • Study Site 2
  • Study Site
  • Study Site 1
  • Study Site 2
  • Study Site
  • Study Site
  • Study Site
  • Study Site
  • Study Site
  • Study Site
  • Study Site
  • Study Site 1
  • Study Site 2
  • Study Site
  • Study Site
  • Study Site
  • Study Site
  • Study Site
  • Study Site
  • Study Site
  • Study Site
  • Study Site
  • Study Site
  • Study Site
  • Study Site
  • Study Site
  • Study Site
  • Study Site
  • Study Site
  • Study Site
  • Study Site
  • Study Site
  • Study Site
  • Study Site
  • Study Site
  • Study Site
  • Study Site
  • Study Site
  • Study Site
  • Study Site
  • Study Site
  • Study Site
  • Study Site
  • Study Site
  • Study Site
  • Study Site
  • Study Site
  • Study Site
  • Study Site
  • Study Site
  • Study Site
  • Study Site
  • Study Site
  • Study Site
  • Study Site
  • Study Site
  • Study Site 1
  • Study Site 2
  • Study Site
  • Study Site
  • Study Site
  • Study Site
  • Study Site 1
  • Study Site 2
  • Study Site
  • Study Site
  • Study Site
  • Study Site
  • Study Site
  • Study Site
  • Study Site

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm Type

Experimental

Arm Label

Phase 1 and Phase 2

Arm Description

Aripiprazole (2-mg, 5-mg, 10-mg, 15-mg, 20-mg, 25-mg or 30-mg)

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or participant enrolled in a clinical trial and which did not necessarily have a causal relationship with the study medication. A treatment emergent adverse event (TEAE) was any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of study medication, whether or not considered to have a causal relationship with the study medication. A serious-AE or reaction was any untoward occurrence that, at any dose, was fatal, life-threatening, required inpatient hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, was a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or was any other medically significant event that, based on appropriate medical judgment, may have jeopardized the participant and may have required medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed above.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Incidence of Laboratory Values of Potential Clinical Relevance
The laboratory values were one of the parameters to measure the safety and tolerability of individual participants. Incidence of TEAEs of potential clinical relevance include abnormal values in serum chemistry, hematology, urinalyses and prolactin tests that were identified based on pre-defined criteria. Abnormal laboratory values in participants were reported as SAE/AEs and are reported in the SAE/other AE section of this report.
Incidence of Physical Examination Findings of Potential Clinical Relevance
The physical examination evaluation was one of the parameters to measure the safety and tolerability of individual participants. Incidence of TEAEs of potential clinical relevance include abnormal changes in the following body systems: head, ears, eyes, nose, and throat; thorax; abdomen; urogenital; extremities; neurological; and skin and mucosae.
Incidence of Vital Signs of Potential Clinical Relevance
Vital signs are taken at Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, and Months 3, 4, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24 of Phase 2 (Visits beyond Month 12 only for de novo subjects). Assessments included orthostatic (supine and standing) blood pressure (BP), heart rate and body temperature. Incidence of TEAEs of potential clinical relevance included abnormal values in heart rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, respiratory rate and weight that were identified based on pre-defined criteria. Abnormal vital signs in participants were reported as SAE/AEs and are reported in the SAE/other AE section of this report.
Mean Change From Baseline by Week in Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS)
The AIMS Scale was an extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS) rating scale. The AIMS is a 12 item scale. The first 10 items e.g. facial and oral movements (items 1-4), extremity movements (items 5 and 6), trunk movements (item 7), investigators global assessment of dyskinesia (items 8 to 10). The first 10 items are rated from 0 to 4 (0=best, 4=worst). Items 11 and 12, related to dental status, have dichotomous responses, 0=no and 1=yes. The AIMS Total Score is the sum of the ratings for the first seven items. The possible total scores are from 0 to 28.
Mean Change From Baseline by Week in Simpson-Angus Scale (SAS) Total Score
The SAS is a rating scale used to measure EPS. The SAS scale consists of a list of 10 symptoms of parkinsonism (gait, arm dropping, shoulder shaking, elbow rigidity, wrist rigidity, head rotation, glabella tap, tremor, salivation, and akathisia), with each item rated from 0 to 4, with 0 being normal and 4 being the worst. The SAS Total score is sum of ratings for all 10 items, with possible Total scores from 0 to 40.
Mean Change From Baseline by Week in Barnes Akathisia Rating Scale (BARS) Score
The BARS was an EPS rating scale. The BARS was used to assess the presence and severity of akathisia. This scale consists of 4 items. Only the 4th item, the Global Clinical Assessment of Akathisia, was evaluated in this trial. This item is rated on a 6 point scale, with 0 being best (absent) and 5 being worst (severe akathisia).
Number of Participants With Cognitive Impairment for Each New York Assessment for Adverse Cognitive Effects of Neuropsychiatric Treatment (NY-AACENT)
The NY-AACENT is not a validated scale. It was included in this trial because of concerns that regulatory authorities (the European Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use [CHMP] and the Paediatric Sub-Committee of the European Medicinal Agency [PDCO]) had regarding drug induced cognitive impairment. No validated scale addressing these issues was available at the time of the trial. The NY-AACENT was used to detect changes in cognitive function subsequent to pharmacological or similar treatments for neurological or psychiatric problems. It was specifically designed to be used in pediatric populations (ages 12 to 17), but could have been utilized with other age groups, as appropriate.
Baseline and Post-Baseline Tanner Staging
Tanner staging was completed together with the physical examination by the same trial-affiliated clinician in the most inconspicuous manner for the participant as possible. Tanner staging assessment consisted of 2 domains (pubic hair and breast development) for girls and 3 domains (pubic hair, penis development, and testes development) for boys. A participant who reached Stage 5 (both in pubic hair and genitalia) did not need to continue with Tanner Staging assessment and the Tanner Staging scales of this participant were imputed as 5 for all of the following scheduled time points up to and including the completion visit/ET visit. The clinician arrived at a single score summarizing the domains (not individual domain scores) when evaluating the participant. The total shift data for last visit is presented below.
Mean Change From Baseline for Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) in Suicidal Ideation Intensity Total Score
Suicidality was defined as reporting at least one occurrence of any suicidal behavior or suicidal ideation. Suicidal behavior was defined as reporting any type of suicidal behaviors (actual attempt, interrupted attempt, aborted attempt, and preparatory acts or behavior). Suicidal ideation was defined as reporting any type of suicidal ideation. The suicidal ideation intensity total score is the sum of intensity scores of 5 items (frequency, duration, controllability, deterrents, and reasons for ideation). The score of each intensity item ranges from 0 (none) to 5 (worst) which leads to the range of the total score from 0 to 25. A missing score of any item resulted in a missing total score. If no suicidal ideation was reported, a score of 0 was given to the intensity scale.
Incidence of Suicidality, Suicidal Behavior and Suicidal Ideation
Suicidality was defined as reporting at least one occurrence of any suicidal behavior or suicidal ideation. Suicidal behavior was defined as reporting any type of suicidal behaviors (actual attempt, interrupted attempt, aborted attempt, and preparatory acts or behavior). Suicidal ideation was defined as reporting any type of suicidal ideation. The below reported N value is the number of participants with specified suicidal ideation/behavior at the given time point.
Percentage of Participants Who Discontinued Due to All Adverse Events
The percentage of participants who discontinued due to all causes other than sponsor terminating the trial was measured from the date of entering the open-label treatment phase to the date of ET for discontinued participants in the open-label treatment phase (ie, time to discontinuation = date of discontinuation [or date of completion for completed participants] - date of participant entering the open-label treatment phase + 1). If the participants completed the trial or were discontinued due to the sponsor terminating the trial, they were censored at the time of completion or trial termination, respectively.
Mean Change From Baseline in Positive and Negative Symptoms Score (PANSS) Total Score
The PANSS consisted of three subscales: a total of 30 symptom constructs. For each symptom construct, severity was rated on a 7-point scale, with a score of 1 (absence of symptoms) and a score of 7 (extremely severe symptoms). The PANSS total score was the sum of the rating scores for 7 positive scale items, 7 negative scale items, and 16 general psychopathology scale items from the PANSS panel. The PANSS total score ranged from 30 (best possible outcome) to 210 (worst possible outcome).
Mean Change From Baseline in PANSS Positive Subscale Score
The PANSS consisted of three subscales: a total of 30 symptom constructs. For each symptom construct, severity was rated on a 7-point scale, with a score of 1 (absence of symptoms) and a score of 7 (extremely severe symptoms). The PANSS positive subscale score was the sum of the rating scores for the 7 positive scale items from the PANSS panel. The 7 positive symptom constructs are delusions, conceptual disorganization, hallucinatory behavior, excitement, grandiosity, suspiciousness/persecution, and hostility. The PANSS Positive Subscale ranges from 7 (absence of symptoms) to 49 (extremely severe symptoms).
Mean Change From Baseline in PANSS Negative Subscale Score
The PANSS consisted of three subscales: a total of 30 symptom constructs. For each symptom construct, severity was rated on a 7-point scale, with a score of 1 (absence of symptoms) and a score of 7 (extremely severe symptoms). The PANSS negative subscale score was the sum of the rating scores for the 7 negative scale items from the PANSS panel. The 7 negative symptom constructs: blunted affect, emotional withdrawal, poor rapport, passive apathetic withdrawal, difficulty in abstract thinking, lack of spontaneity and flow of conversation, stereotyped thinking. The PANSS Negative Subscale ranges from 7 (absence of symptoms) to 49 (extremely severe symptoms).
Mean Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) Score
The severity of illness for each participant was rated using the CGI-S scale. To assess CGI-S, the study physician answered the following question: "Considering your total clinical experience with this particular population, how mentally ill is the participant at this time?" Response choices included: 0 = not assessed; 1 = normal, not ill at all; 2 = borderline mentally ill; 3 = mildly ill; 4 = moderately ill; 5 = markedly ill; 6 = severely ill; and 7 = among the most extremely ill participants.
Mean Change in Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) Score
The efficacy of trial medication were rated for each participant using the CGI-I scale. The study physician must rate the participant's total improvement whether or not it is due entirely to drug treatment. All responses were compared to the participant's condition at baseline. Response choices include: 0 = not assessed; 1 =very much improved; 2 = much improved; 3 = minimally improved; 4 = no change; 5 =minimally worse; 6 = much worse; and 7 = very much worse.
Mean Change From Baseline in Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) Score
The YMRS consists of 11 items assessing the core symptoms of mania and was used to assess participants with bipolar I disorder, manic and mixed episodes with or without psychotic features: elevated mood, increased motor activity - energy, sexual interest, sleep, irritability, speech (rate and amount), language - thought disorder, content, disruptive - aggressive behavior, appearance, and insight. Each item had 5 or 9 grades of severity, with lower scores indicating milder symptoms. The number of raters within each trial center was to be kept to a minimum. The YMRS Total Score (range 0 to 44) is the sum of the rating scores for 11 items for assessing the core symptoms of mania. A missing value for any YMRS assessment item(s) could have resulted in a missing YMRS Total Score. A higher YMRS Total Score represents greater severity. In this study, 94 participants had bipolar disorder, this explains the N=94 in the table below and these were de novo participants.
Mean Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression Scale - Bipolar (CGI-BP) Version Severity Score
The CGI-BP scale refers to the global impression of the subject with respect to bipolar disorder. The scale rated the subject's Severity of Illness (CGI-BP-Severity: mania, depression, and overall bipolar illness) and Change From Preceding Phase (CGI-BP-Improvement: mania, depression, and overall bipolar illness) based on a 7- or 8-point scale. Severity of Illness (CGI-BP-Severity) was rated at all visits. At each visit other than Day 0 (Baseline), the Change From Preceding Phase (CGI-BP-Improvement) was judged with respect to participant's condition at Baseline. The CGI-BP Severity Scores (range 1 to 7), as well as CGI-BP Improvement Scores (range 1 to 7) are single-item rating scores, with higher scores representing greater severity or less improvement. Data for 94 de novo participants were available with bipolar disorder.
Mean Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression Scale - Bipolar Version Improvement Score
The CGI-BP scale refers to the global impression of the subject with respect to bipolar disorder. The scale rated the subject's Severity of Illness (CGI-BP-Severity: mania, depression, and overall bipolar illness) and Change From Preceding Phase (CGI-BP-Improvement: mania, depression, and overall bipolar illness) based on a 7- or 8-point scale. Severity of Illness (CGI-BP-Severity) was rated at all visits. At each visit other than Day 0 (Baseline), the Change From Preceding Phase (CGI-BP-Improvement) was judged with respect to participant's condition at Baseline. The CGI-BP Severity Scores (range 1 to 7), as well as CGI-BP Improvement Scores (range 1 to 7) are single-item rating scores, with higher scores representing greater severity or less improvement. Only 94 participants had data at Baseline to explain the N=94 in the table below and these were de novo participants.
Mean Change From Baseline in General Behavior Inventory (GBI) Scale Total Score for Mania and Depression in Both Parent/Guardian and Subject Version of the Scale
The GBI is a self-report inventory with 73 items focusing on mood-related behaviors, including depressive, hypomanic, and biphasic symptoms. For this trial, two 20-item subscales were utilized: one was completed by the parent/guardian or legal representative, as applicable for local laws, and the other was completed by the participant. Responses were given on a 4-point Likert scale, with 0 being never or hardly ever and 3 being very often or almost constantly. The GBI Total Score for mania (range 0 to 30) is the sum of scores for items 1 to 10 and the GBI Total Score for depression (range 0 to 30) is the sum of scores for items 11 to 20 in the GBI Parent/Guardian or Subject Version panel. Scores from the Parent/Guardian and participant Versions were summarized separately. A missing value for any GBI assessment items could have resulted in a missing GBI Total Score. High scores represent greater psychopathology. Data was only available for 80 de novo participants with bipolar disorder.
Mean Change From Baseline in the Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorders Rating (ADHD-RS-IV) Scale Score
The ADHD-RS-IV is a reliable and easy-to-administer instrument both for diagnosing ADHD in children and adolescents and for assessing treatment response. Containing 18 items, the scale was linked directly to DSM-IV-TR diagnostic criteria for ADHD. There were 3 versions of the scale: a parent questionnaire on home behaviors (English), a parent questionnaire on home behaviors (Spanish), and a teacher questionnaire on classroom behaviors. For this trial, the parent questionnaire on home behaviors (English) was utilized. The ADHD-RS-IV Total Score (range 0 to 54) is the sum of rating scores for 18 items, with higher scores representing greater severity. A missing value for any ADHD-RS-IV assessment items could have resulted in a missing ADHD-RS-IV Total Score. Data were only available for 82 participants with bipolar disorder and these were de novo participants.
Mean Change From Baseline in Children's Global Assessment Scale (CGAS) in Bipolar (de Novo Participants)
The CGAS is a 100-point rating scale measuring psychological, social, and school functioning for children aged 6 to 17. It was adapted from the Adults Global Assessment Scale. The Global Assessment Scale was a rating scale for evaluating the overall functioning of a participant during a specified time period on a continuum from psychological or psychiatric sickness to health. The CGAS is a valid and reliable tool for rating a child's general level of functioning on a health-illness continuum. The CGAS was developed by Schaffer and colleagues to provide a global measure of severity of disturbance in children and adolescents. The CGAS Score (range 1 to 100) is a single-item score for rating a child's general level of functioning on a health-illness continuum, with higher scores representing better functioning.

Full Information

First Posted
May 6, 2010
Last Updated
January 8, 2016
Sponsor
Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc.
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01122927
Brief Title
Safety and Tolerability of Aripiprazole in Adolescents With Schizophrenia or Children and Adolescents With Bipolar I Disorder, Manic or Mixed Episode With or Without Psychotic Features.
Acronym
ATTAIN 267
Official Title
A Long-term, Multicenter, Open-Label Study to Evaluate the Safety and Tolerability of Flexible-Dose Oral Aripiprazole (OPC-14597) as Maintenance Treatment in Adolescent Patients With Schizophrenia or Child and Adolescent Patients With Bipolar I Disorder, Manic or Mixed Episode With or Without Psychotic Features
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
January 2016
Overall Recruitment Status
Terminated
Why Stopped
The trial was terminated early as the objective of the Aripiprazole Pediatric Investigational Plan was met and provided 2 years of safety data.
Study Start Date
July 2010 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
August 2014 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
September 2014 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc.

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This is an open-label study consisting of a screening period, a conversion/titration phase (Phase 1), an open-label treatment phase (Phase 2), and a follow-up period. The study will enroll new subjects (hereafter referred as "de novo" subjects) with schizophrenia, or bipolar I disorder, manic or mixed episode with or without psychotic features, and rollover subjects with schizophrenia from 31-09-266 (hereafter referred to as "Study 266"). All de novo subjects must enter the screening period of the study. Subjects who are screened and are not required to go through Phase 1 will complete a Phase 2 baseline visit prior to their participation in Phase 2. Study Design: Treatment, Single Group Assignment, Open Label, Active Control, Safety/Efficacy Study

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Adolescent Schizophrenia, Child or Adolescent Bipolar I Disorder, Manic or Mixed Episode With or Without Psychotic Features
Keywords
schizophrenia, adolescent, bipolar

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
524 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Phase 1 and Phase 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Aripiprazole (2-mg, 5-mg, 10-mg, 15-mg, 20-mg, 25-mg or 30-mg)
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Aripiprazole
Intervention Description
Aripiprazole (2-mg, 5-mg, 10-mg, 15-mg, 20-mg, 25-mg or 30-mg) pill taken orally once per day
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)
Description
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or participant enrolled in a clinical trial and which did not necessarily have a causal relationship with the study medication. A treatment emergent adverse event (TEAE) was any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of study medication, whether or not considered to have a causal relationship with the study medication. A serious-AE or reaction was any untoward occurrence that, at any dose, was fatal, life-threatening, required inpatient hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, was a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or was any other medically significant event that, based on appropriate medical judgment, may have jeopardized the participant and may have required medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed above.
Time Frame
Adverse events were recorded from the time of the informed consent was signed throughout the 24 month treatment period until the follow-up visit 30 (± 3) days after the end of trial.
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Incidence of Laboratory Values of Potential Clinical Relevance
Description
The laboratory values were one of the parameters to measure the safety and tolerability of individual participants. Incidence of TEAEs of potential clinical relevance include abnormal values in serum chemistry, hematology, urinalyses and prolactin tests that were identified based on pre-defined criteria. Abnormal laboratory values in participants were reported as SAE/AEs and are reported in the SAE/other AE section of this report.
Time Frame
Baseline to Month 24
Title
Incidence of Physical Examination Findings of Potential Clinical Relevance
Description
The physical examination evaluation was one of the parameters to measure the safety and tolerability of individual participants. Incidence of TEAEs of potential clinical relevance include abnormal changes in the following body systems: head, ears, eyes, nose, and throat; thorax; abdomen; urogenital; extremities; neurological; and skin and mucosae.
Time Frame
Baseline to Month 24
Title
Incidence of Vital Signs of Potential Clinical Relevance
Description
Vital signs are taken at Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, and Months 3, 4, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24 of Phase 2 (Visits beyond Month 12 only for de novo subjects). Assessments included orthostatic (supine and standing) blood pressure (BP), heart rate and body temperature. Incidence of TEAEs of potential clinical relevance included abnormal values in heart rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, respiratory rate and weight that were identified based on pre-defined criteria. Abnormal vital signs in participants were reported as SAE/AEs and are reported in the SAE/other AE section of this report.
Time Frame
Baseline to Month 24
Title
Mean Change From Baseline by Week in Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS)
Description
The AIMS Scale was an extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS) rating scale. The AIMS is a 12 item scale. The first 10 items e.g. facial and oral movements (items 1-4), extremity movements (items 5 and 6), trunk movements (item 7), investigators global assessment of dyskinesia (items 8 to 10). The first 10 items are rated from 0 to 4 (0=best, 4=worst). Items 11 and 12, related to dental status, have dichotomous responses, 0=no and 1=yes. The AIMS Total Score is the sum of the ratings for the first seven items. The possible total scores are from 0 to 28.
Time Frame
Baseline to Month 24
Title
Mean Change From Baseline by Week in Simpson-Angus Scale (SAS) Total Score
Description
The SAS is a rating scale used to measure EPS. The SAS scale consists of a list of 10 symptoms of parkinsonism (gait, arm dropping, shoulder shaking, elbow rigidity, wrist rigidity, head rotation, glabella tap, tremor, salivation, and akathisia), with each item rated from 0 to 4, with 0 being normal and 4 being the worst. The SAS Total score is sum of ratings for all 10 items, with possible Total scores from 0 to 40.
Time Frame
Baseline to Month 24
Title
Mean Change From Baseline by Week in Barnes Akathisia Rating Scale (BARS) Score
Description
The BARS was an EPS rating scale. The BARS was used to assess the presence and severity of akathisia. This scale consists of 4 items. Only the 4th item, the Global Clinical Assessment of Akathisia, was evaluated in this trial. This item is rated on a 6 point scale, with 0 being best (absent) and 5 being worst (severe akathisia).
Time Frame
Baseline to Month 24
Title
Number of Participants With Cognitive Impairment for Each New York Assessment for Adverse Cognitive Effects of Neuropsychiatric Treatment (NY-AACENT)
Description
The NY-AACENT is not a validated scale. It was included in this trial because of concerns that regulatory authorities (the European Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use [CHMP] and the Paediatric Sub-Committee of the European Medicinal Agency [PDCO]) had regarding drug induced cognitive impairment. No validated scale addressing these issues was available at the time of the trial. The NY-AACENT was used to detect changes in cognitive function subsequent to pharmacological or similar treatments for neurological or psychiatric problems. It was specifically designed to be used in pediatric populations (ages 12 to 17), but could have been utilized with other age groups, as appropriate.
Time Frame
Baseline to Month 24
Title
Baseline and Post-Baseline Tanner Staging
Description
Tanner staging was completed together with the physical examination by the same trial-affiliated clinician in the most inconspicuous manner for the participant as possible. Tanner staging assessment consisted of 2 domains (pubic hair and breast development) for girls and 3 domains (pubic hair, penis development, and testes development) for boys. A participant who reached Stage 5 (both in pubic hair and genitalia) did not need to continue with Tanner Staging assessment and the Tanner Staging scales of this participant were imputed as 5 for all of the following scheduled time points up to and including the completion visit/ET visit. The clinician arrived at a single score summarizing the domains (not individual domain scores) when evaluating the participant. The total shift data for last visit is presented below.
Time Frame
Baseline to Last Visit
Title
Mean Change From Baseline for Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) in Suicidal Ideation Intensity Total Score
Description
Suicidality was defined as reporting at least one occurrence of any suicidal behavior or suicidal ideation. Suicidal behavior was defined as reporting any type of suicidal behaviors (actual attempt, interrupted attempt, aborted attempt, and preparatory acts or behavior). Suicidal ideation was defined as reporting any type of suicidal ideation. The suicidal ideation intensity total score is the sum of intensity scores of 5 items (frequency, duration, controllability, deterrents, and reasons for ideation). The score of each intensity item ranges from 0 (none) to 5 (worst) which leads to the range of the total score from 0 to 25. A missing score of any item resulted in a missing total score. If no suicidal ideation was reported, a score of 0 was given to the intensity scale.
Time Frame
Baseline to Month 24
Title
Incidence of Suicidality, Suicidal Behavior and Suicidal Ideation
Description
Suicidality was defined as reporting at least one occurrence of any suicidal behavior or suicidal ideation. Suicidal behavior was defined as reporting any type of suicidal behaviors (actual attempt, interrupted attempt, aborted attempt, and preparatory acts or behavior). Suicidal ideation was defined as reporting any type of suicidal ideation. The below reported N value is the number of participants with specified suicidal ideation/behavior at the given time point.
Time Frame
Baseline to Month 24
Title
Percentage of Participants Who Discontinued Due to All Adverse Events
Description
The percentage of participants who discontinued due to all causes other than sponsor terminating the trial was measured from the date of entering the open-label treatment phase to the date of ET for discontinued participants in the open-label treatment phase (ie, time to discontinuation = date of discontinuation [or date of completion for completed participants] - date of participant entering the open-label treatment phase + 1). If the participants completed the trial or were discontinued due to the sponsor terminating the trial, they were censored at the time of completion or trial termination, respectively.
Time Frame
Baseline to Month 24
Title
Mean Change From Baseline in Positive and Negative Symptoms Score (PANSS) Total Score
Description
The PANSS consisted of three subscales: a total of 30 symptom constructs. For each symptom construct, severity was rated on a 7-point scale, with a score of 1 (absence of symptoms) and a score of 7 (extremely severe symptoms). The PANSS total score was the sum of the rating scores for 7 positive scale items, 7 negative scale items, and 16 general psychopathology scale items from the PANSS panel. The PANSS total score ranged from 30 (best possible outcome) to 210 (worst possible outcome).
Time Frame
Baseline to Month 24
Title
Mean Change From Baseline in PANSS Positive Subscale Score
Description
The PANSS consisted of three subscales: a total of 30 symptom constructs. For each symptom construct, severity was rated on a 7-point scale, with a score of 1 (absence of symptoms) and a score of 7 (extremely severe symptoms). The PANSS positive subscale score was the sum of the rating scores for the 7 positive scale items from the PANSS panel. The 7 positive symptom constructs are delusions, conceptual disorganization, hallucinatory behavior, excitement, grandiosity, suspiciousness/persecution, and hostility. The PANSS Positive Subscale ranges from 7 (absence of symptoms) to 49 (extremely severe symptoms).
Time Frame
Baseline to Month 24
Title
Mean Change From Baseline in PANSS Negative Subscale Score
Description
The PANSS consisted of three subscales: a total of 30 symptom constructs. For each symptom construct, severity was rated on a 7-point scale, with a score of 1 (absence of symptoms) and a score of 7 (extremely severe symptoms). The PANSS negative subscale score was the sum of the rating scores for the 7 negative scale items from the PANSS panel. The 7 negative symptom constructs: blunted affect, emotional withdrawal, poor rapport, passive apathetic withdrawal, difficulty in abstract thinking, lack of spontaneity and flow of conversation, stereotyped thinking. The PANSS Negative Subscale ranges from 7 (absence of symptoms) to 49 (extremely severe symptoms).
Time Frame
Baseline to Month 24
Title
Mean Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) Score
Description
The severity of illness for each participant was rated using the CGI-S scale. To assess CGI-S, the study physician answered the following question: "Considering your total clinical experience with this particular population, how mentally ill is the participant at this time?" Response choices included: 0 = not assessed; 1 = normal, not ill at all; 2 = borderline mentally ill; 3 = mildly ill; 4 = moderately ill; 5 = markedly ill; 6 = severely ill; and 7 = among the most extremely ill participants.
Time Frame
Baseline to Month 24
Title
Mean Change in Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) Score
Description
The efficacy of trial medication were rated for each participant using the CGI-I scale. The study physician must rate the participant's total improvement whether or not it is due entirely to drug treatment. All responses were compared to the participant's condition at baseline. Response choices include: 0 = not assessed; 1 =very much improved; 2 = much improved; 3 = minimally improved; 4 = no change; 5 =minimally worse; 6 = much worse; and 7 = very much worse.
Time Frame
Baseline to Month 24
Title
Mean Change From Baseline in Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) Score
Description
The YMRS consists of 11 items assessing the core symptoms of mania and was used to assess participants with bipolar I disorder, manic and mixed episodes with or without psychotic features: elevated mood, increased motor activity - energy, sexual interest, sleep, irritability, speech (rate and amount), language - thought disorder, content, disruptive - aggressive behavior, appearance, and insight. Each item had 5 or 9 grades of severity, with lower scores indicating milder symptoms. The number of raters within each trial center was to be kept to a minimum. The YMRS Total Score (range 0 to 44) is the sum of the rating scores for 11 items for assessing the core symptoms of mania. A missing value for any YMRS assessment item(s) could have resulted in a missing YMRS Total Score. A higher YMRS Total Score represents greater severity. In this study, 94 participants had bipolar disorder, this explains the N=94 in the table below and these were de novo participants.
Time Frame
Baseline to Month 24
Title
Mean Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression Scale - Bipolar (CGI-BP) Version Severity Score
Description
The CGI-BP scale refers to the global impression of the subject with respect to bipolar disorder. The scale rated the subject's Severity of Illness (CGI-BP-Severity: mania, depression, and overall bipolar illness) and Change From Preceding Phase (CGI-BP-Improvement: mania, depression, and overall bipolar illness) based on a 7- or 8-point scale. Severity of Illness (CGI-BP-Severity) was rated at all visits. At each visit other than Day 0 (Baseline), the Change From Preceding Phase (CGI-BP-Improvement) was judged with respect to participant's condition at Baseline. The CGI-BP Severity Scores (range 1 to 7), as well as CGI-BP Improvement Scores (range 1 to 7) are single-item rating scores, with higher scores representing greater severity or less improvement. Data for 94 de novo participants were available with bipolar disorder.
Time Frame
Baseline to Month 24
Title
Mean Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression Scale - Bipolar Version Improvement Score
Description
The CGI-BP scale refers to the global impression of the subject with respect to bipolar disorder. The scale rated the subject's Severity of Illness (CGI-BP-Severity: mania, depression, and overall bipolar illness) and Change From Preceding Phase (CGI-BP-Improvement: mania, depression, and overall bipolar illness) based on a 7- or 8-point scale. Severity of Illness (CGI-BP-Severity) was rated at all visits. At each visit other than Day 0 (Baseline), the Change From Preceding Phase (CGI-BP-Improvement) was judged with respect to participant's condition at Baseline. The CGI-BP Severity Scores (range 1 to 7), as well as CGI-BP Improvement Scores (range 1 to 7) are single-item rating scores, with higher scores representing greater severity or less improvement. Only 94 participants had data at Baseline to explain the N=94 in the table below and these were de novo participants.
Time Frame
Baseline to Month 24
Title
Mean Change From Baseline in General Behavior Inventory (GBI) Scale Total Score for Mania and Depression in Both Parent/Guardian and Subject Version of the Scale
Description
The GBI is a self-report inventory with 73 items focusing on mood-related behaviors, including depressive, hypomanic, and biphasic symptoms. For this trial, two 20-item subscales were utilized: one was completed by the parent/guardian or legal representative, as applicable for local laws, and the other was completed by the participant. Responses were given on a 4-point Likert scale, with 0 being never or hardly ever and 3 being very often or almost constantly. The GBI Total Score for mania (range 0 to 30) is the sum of scores for items 1 to 10 and the GBI Total Score for depression (range 0 to 30) is the sum of scores for items 11 to 20 in the GBI Parent/Guardian or Subject Version panel. Scores from the Parent/Guardian and participant Versions were summarized separately. A missing value for any GBI assessment items could have resulted in a missing GBI Total Score. High scores represent greater psychopathology. Data was only available for 80 de novo participants with bipolar disorder.
Time Frame
Baseline to Month 24
Title
Mean Change From Baseline in the Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorders Rating (ADHD-RS-IV) Scale Score
Description
The ADHD-RS-IV is a reliable and easy-to-administer instrument both for diagnosing ADHD in children and adolescents and for assessing treatment response. Containing 18 items, the scale was linked directly to DSM-IV-TR diagnostic criteria for ADHD. There were 3 versions of the scale: a parent questionnaire on home behaviors (English), a parent questionnaire on home behaviors (Spanish), and a teacher questionnaire on classroom behaviors. For this trial, the parent questionnaire on home behaviors (English) was utilized. The ADHD-RS-IV Total Score (range 0 to 54) is the sum of rating scores for 18 items, with higher scores representing greater severity. A missing value for any ADHD-RS-IV assessment items could have resulted in a missing ADHD-RS-IV Total Score. Data were only available for 82 participants with bipolar disorder and these were de novo participants.
Time Frame
Baseline to Month 24
Title
Mean Change From Baseline in Children's Global Assessment Scale (CGAS) in Bipolar (de Novo Participants)
Description
The CGAS is a 100-point rating scale measuring psychological, social, and school functioning for children aged 6 to 17. It was adapted from the Adults Global Assessment Scale. The Global Assessment Scale was a rating scale for evaluating the overall functioning of a participant during a specified time period on a continuum from psychological or psychiatric sickness to health. The CGAS is a valid and reliable tool for rating a child's general level of functioning on a health-illness continuum. The CGAS was developed by Schaffer and colleagues to provide a global measure of severity of disturbance in children and adolescents. The CGAS Score (range 1 to 100) is a single-item score for rating a child's general level of functioning on a health-illness continuum, with higher scores representing better functioning.
Time Frame
Baseline to Month 24

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
10 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
17 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Subjects 13-17 years old (Schizophrenia); Subjects 10-17 years old (Bipolar manic or mixed episode)* [*Bulgaria will enroll Schizophrenia subjects only.] Subjects with a current diagnosis of schizophrenia, and a history of the illness (diagnosis or symptoms) for at least 6 months prior to screening (as per subject, family, or healthcare provider, or by previous medical records). Subjects with a current diagnosis of bipolar I disorder, manic or mixed episode with or without psychotic features (diagnosis or symptoms) experiencing symptoms for at least 1 week prior to screening. * [*These subjects will not be eligible to enroll in Bulgaria] Subjects who have shown previous response to antipsychotic treatment (other than clozapine) and are not resistant to treatment with other antipsychotics. Subjects who are currently being treated with oral antipsychotics other than clozapine, and are not resistant to treatment with other antipsychotics. Inpatient or outpatient status, with the exception of acute hospitalization due to psychiatric reasons at the time of screening or before Phase 2. Exclusion Criteria: All subjects: diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder, autism, pervasive developmental disorder (PDD), OCD, or PTSD. Subjects with schizophrenia: a current major depressive episode. Subjects with bipolar manic or mixed episode: presenting with a clinical picture and/or history that is consistent with a diagnosis of bipolar II disorder or bipolar disorder not otherwise specified. Subjects with delirium, dementia, amnesia or other cognitive disorders; subjects with psychotic symptoms that are better accounted for by another general medical condition(s) or direct effect of a substance (i.e., medication, illicit drug use, etc.). Subjects with any neurological disorder, with the exception of Tourette's syndrome. Subjects experiencing major depressive episode at the time of screening other than subjects diagnosed with bipolar I disorder mixed episode. Subjects who are currently receiving clozapine or have received clozapine at any time in the past are ineligible for entry into the study. Subjects who meet the DSM-IV-TR criteria for substance dependence (including alcohol and benzodiazepines, but excluding caffeine and nicotine) within the past 180 days prior to screening. Subjects who have epilepsy, a history of seizures (except for a single childhood febrile seizure or post-traumatic seizure), or a history of severe head trauma or stroke, or have a history or current evidence of other unstable medical conditions. Subjects with a history of subclinical hypothyroidism (TSH ≥ 4.0 mIU/L), known hypothyroidism, or hyperthyroidism (unless the condition has been stabilized with medications for at least 90 days prior to entry into Phase 1 or Phase 2). Subjects who have a medical history of uncontrolled diabetes, labile or unstable diabetes (brittle diabetes), newly diagnosed diabetes, or clinically significant abnormal blood glucose levels (defined as fasting blood glucose ≥ 125 mg/dL).
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Eva Kohegyi, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development and Commercialization, Inc.
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Study Site
City
Dothan
State/Province
Alabama
ZIP/Postal Code
36303
Country
United States
Facility Name
Study Site
City
Downey
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
90241
Country
United States
Facility Name
Study Site
City
Miami
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33155
Country
United States
Facility Name
Study Site
City
Miami
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33166
Country
United States
Facility Name
Study Site
City
Atlanta
State/Province
Georgia
ZIP/Postal Code
30308
Country
United States
Facility Name
Study Site
City
Smyrna
State/Province
Georgia
ZIP/Postal Code
30080
Country
United States
Facility Name
Study Site
City
Oak Brook
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60523
Country
United States
Facility Name
Study Site
City
Wichita
State/Province
Kansas
ZIP/Postal Code
67214
Country
United States
Facility Name
Study Site
City
Minneapolis
State/Province
Minnesota
ZIP/Postal Code
55454
Country
United States
Facility Name
Study Site
City
Buffalo
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
14215
Country
United States
Facility Name
Study Site
City
Stony Brook
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
11794
Country
United States
Facility Name
Study Site
City
Chapel Hill
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27517
Country
United States
Facility Name
Study Site
City
Cincinnati
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
45219
Country
United States
Facility Name
Study Site
City
Cleveland
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
44106
Country
United States
Facility Name
Study Site
City
Oklahoma City
State/Province
Oklahoma
ZIP/Postal Code
73116
Country
United States
Facility Name
Study Site
City
Philadelphia
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
19139
Country
United States
Facility Name
Study Site
City
Houston
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
77090
Country
United States
Facility Name
Study Site
City
San Antonio
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
78258
Country
United States
Facility Name
Study Site
City
The Woodlands
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
77381
Country
United States
Facility Name
Study Site
City
Richmond
State/Province
Virginia
ZIP/Postal Code
23230
Country
United States
Facility Name
Study Site
City
Bellevue
State/Province
Washington
ZIP/Postal Code
98004
Country
United States
Facility Name
Study Site
City
Bothell
State/Province
Washington
ZIP/Postal Code
98011
Country
United States
Facility Name
Study Site
City
Milwaukee
State/Province
Wisconsin
ZIP/Postal Code
53227
Country
United States
Facility Name
Study Site
City
Bourgas
ZIP/Postal Code
8000
Country
Bulgaria
Facility Name
Study Site
City
Pazardjik
ZIP/Postal Code
4400
Country
Bulgaria
Facility Name
Study Site
City
Plovdiv
ZIP/Postal Code
4000
Country
Bulgaria
Facility Name
Study Site
City
Rousse
ZIP/Postal Code
7004
Country
Bulgaria
Facility Name
Study Site 2
City
Sofia
ZIP/Postal Code
1431
Country
Bulgaria
Facility Name
Study Site
City
Targovishte
ZIP/Postal Code
7700
Country
Bulgaria
Facility Name
Study Site 1
City
Varna
ZIP/Postal Code
9010
Country
Bulgaria
Facility Name
Study Site 2
City
Varna
ZIP/Postal Code
9010
Country
Bulgaria
Facility Name
Study Site
City
Rijeka
ZIP/Postal Code
51000
Country
Croatia
Facility Name
Study Site 1
City
Zagreb
ZIP/Postal Code
10000
Country
Croatia
Facility Name
Study Site 2
City
Zagreb
ZIP/Postal Code
10000
Country
Croatia
Facility Name
Study Site
City
Budapest
ZIP/Postal Code
H-1021
Country
Hungary
Facility Name
Study Site
City
Budapest
ZIP/Postal Code
H-1135
Country
Hungary
Facility Name
Study Site
City
Gyula
ZIP/Postal Code
H-5700
Country
Hungary
Facility Name
Study Site
City
Szeged
ZIP/Postal Code
H-6725
Country
Hungary
Facility Name
Study Site
City
Vijayawada
State/Province
Andhra Pradesh
ZIP/Postal Code
520002
Country
India
Facility Name
Study Site
City
Visakhapatnam
State/Province
Andhra Pradesh
ZIP/Postal Code
530002
Country
India
Facility Name
Study Site
City
Visakhapatnam
State/Province
Andhra Pradesh
ZIP/Postal Code
530017
Country
India
Facility Name
Study Site 1
City
Ahmedabad
State/Province
Gujarat
ZIP/Postal Code
380006
Country
India
Facility Name
Study Site 2
City
Ahmedabad
State/Province
Gujarat
ZIP/Postal Code
380006
Country
India
Facility Name
Study Site
City
Ahmedabad
State/Province
Gujarat
ZIP/Postal Code
380013
Country
India
Facility Name
Study Site
City
Maninagar, Ahmedabad
State/Province
Gujarat
ZIP/Postal Code
380008
Country
India
Facility Name
Study Site
City
Mangalore
State/Province
Karnataka
ZIP/Postal Code
575001
Country
India
Facility Name
Study Site
City
Calicut
State/Province
Kerala
ZIP/Postal Code
673009
Country
India
Facility Name
Study Site
City
Nasik
State/Province
Maharashtra
ZIP/Postal Code
422101
Country
India
Facility Name
Study Site
City
Ludhiana
State/Province
Punjab
ZIP/Postal Code
141001
Country
India
Facility Name
Study Site
City
Jaipur
State/Province
Rajasthan
ZIP/Postal Code
302017
Country
India
Facility Name
Study Site
City
Chennai
State/Province
Tamil Nadu
ZIP/Postal Code
600003
Country
India
Facility Name
Study Site
City
Maduri
State/Province
Tamil Nadu
ZIP/Postal Code
625020
Country
India
Facility Name
Study Site
City
Kanpur
State/Province
Uttar Pradesh
ZIP/Postal Code
208005
Country
India
Facility Name
Study Site
City
Lucknow
State/Province
Uttar Pradesh
ZIP/Postal Code
226003
Country
India
Facility Name
Study Site
City
Varanasi
State/Province
Uttar Pradesh
ZIP/Postal Code
221005
Country
India
Facility Name
Study Site
City
Guntur
ZIP/Postal Code
522001
Country
India
Facility Name
Study Site
City
Kuala Lumpur
State/Province
Wilayah Persekutuan
ZIP/Postal Code
50603
Country
Malaysia
Facility Name
Study Site
City
Dasmarinas City
State/Province
Cavite
ZIP/Postal Code
4114
Country
Philippines
Facility Name
Study Site
City
Manila City
State/Province
Metro Manila
ZIP/Postal Code
1000
Country
Philippines
Facility Name
Study Site
City
Iloilo City
ZIP/Postal Code
5000
Country
Philippines
Facility Name
Study Site
City
Mandaluyong City
ZIP/Postal Code
1553
Country
Philippines
Facility Name
Study Site
City
Białystok
ZIP/Postal Code
15-879
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Study Site
City
Gdansk Wrzeszcz
ZIP/Postal Code
80-282
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Study Site
City
Toruń
ZIP/Postal Code
87-100
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Study Site
City
Wrocław
ZIP/Postal Code
50-227
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Study Site
City
Wrocław
ZIP/Postal Code
54-235
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Study Site
City
Cluj-Napoca
State/Province
Cluj
ZIP/Postal Code
400084
Country
Romania
Facility Name
Study Site
City
Timisoara
State/Province
Timis
ZIP/Postal Code
300239
Country
Romania
Facility Name
Study Site
City
Bucharest
ZIP/Postal Code
041914
Country
Romania
Facility Name
Study Site
City
Craiova, Dolj
ZIP/Postal Code
200620
Country
Romania
Facility Name
Study Site
City
Iasi
ZIP/Postal Code
700282
Country
Romania
Facility Name
Study Site
City
Ekaterinburg
ZIP/Postal Code
620030
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Study Site
City
Kazan
ZIP/Postal Code
420061
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Study Site
City
Lipetsk
ZIP/Postal Code
399313
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Study Site
City
Moscow
ZIP/Postal Code
124617
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Study Site
City
Moscow
ZIP/Postal Code
127083
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Study Site
City
Nizhniy Novgorod
ZIP/Postal Code
603155
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Study Site
City
Novosibirsk
ZIP/Postal Code
630091
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Study Site
City
Orenburg region
ZIP/Postal Code
460551
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Study Site
City
Petrozavodsk
ZIP/Postal Code
185001
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Study Site
City
Saratov
ZIP/Postal Code
410028
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Study Site
City
St. Petersburg
ZIP/Postal Code
190005
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Study Site
City
St. Petersburg
ZIP/Postal Code
197376
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Study Site
City
Tomsk
ZIP/Postal Code
634014
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Study Site
City
Tonnelnyi Township
ZIP/Postal Code
357034
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Study Site
City
Yaroslavl
ZIP/Postal Code
150003
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Study Site 1
City
Belgrade
ZIP/Postal Code
11000
Country
Serbia
Facility Name
Study Site 2
City
Belgrade
ZIP/Postal Code
11000
Country
Serbia
Facility Name
Study Site
City
Novi Sad
ZIP/Postal Code
21000
Country
Serbia
Facility Name
Study Site
City
Taipei City
ZIP/Postal Code
110
Country
Taiwan
Facility Name
Study Site
City
Dnepropetrovsk
ZIP/Postal Code
49005
Country
Ukraine
Facility Name
Study Site
City
Donetsk
ZIP/Postal Code
83037
Country
Ukraine
Facility Name
Study Site 1
City
Kharkiv
ZIP/Postal Code
61068
Country
Ukraine
Facility Name
Study Site 2
City
Kharkiv
ZIP/Postal Code
61068
Country
Ukraine
Facility Name
Study Site
City
Kherson
ZIP/Postal Code
73488
Country
Ukraine
Facility Name
Study Site
City
Lugansk
ZIP/Postal Code
91045
Country
Ukraine
Facility Name
Study Site
City
Lviv
ZIP/Postal Code
79021
Country
Ukraine
Facility Name
Study Site
City
Odessa
ZIP/Postal Code
65006
Country
Ukraine
Facility Name
Study Site
City
Simferopol Crimea
ZIP/Postal Code
95006
Country
Ukraine
Facility Name
Study Site
City
Temopil
ZIP/Postal Code
4620
Country
Ukraine
Facility Name
Study Site
City
Vinnytsya
ZIP/Postal Code
21005
Country
Ukraine

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

Safety and Tolerability of Aripiprazole in Adolescents With Schizophrenia or Children and Adolescents With Bipolar I Disorder, Manic or Mixed Episode With or Without Psychotic Features.

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs