search
Back to results

SMART Study: A Study of Re-treatment With MabThera (Rituximab) in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis Who Have Failed on Anti-TNF Alfa Therapy

Primary Purpose

Rheumatoid Arthritis

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
France
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
rituximab
Sponsored by
Hoffmann-La Roche
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Rheumatoid Arthritis

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult patients >18 years of age
  • RA for >=6 months
  • Receiving outpatient treatment
  • Ongoing treatment with methotrexate for >=3 months, stable for >=1 month
  • Inadequate response or intolerance to etanercept, infliximab or adalimumab

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous treatment with MabThera
  • Concurrent treatment with any anti TNF-alfa therapy or biologic therapy
  • Previous treatment with any investigational cell-depleting therapies

Sites / Locations

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Experimental

Arm Label

A

B

Arm Description

1000 mg IV rituximab

2 x 1000 mg IV rituximab

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joints Count and C-Reactive Protein (DAS28-CRP) Area Under the Curve (AUC) at Week 104
DAS28-CRP was based on joint counts, overall participant assessment, and serum CRP levels (measured in milligrams per liter [mg/L]) at each visit. Joint counts included swollen joint count (SJC) and tender joint count (TJC). Total score range was 0 to 9.4; a higher score indicated more disease activity. DAS28-CRP less than or equal to (≤)3.2 implied low disease activity, >3.2 to 5.1 implied moderate to high disease activity, and less than (<)2.6 equals (=) remission. The AUC of all DAS28-CRP values between Day 1 and Week 104 (15 values of protocol visits) was calculated using the trapeze method (AUC between t1 and t2=(t2-t1)*((DAS28-CRP at t1 + DAS28-CRP at t2)/2). The true visit dates were used to calculate the time between 2 DAS28-CRP evaluations. All the AUC were censored at Week 104 (linear extrapolation using the 2 last DAS28-CRP values (Weeks 96 and 104) to obtain the "true" DAS28-CRP value at the "true" Week 104).

Secondary Outcome Measures

DAS28-CRP During the Initial Treatment
Mean DAS28-CRP at Week 24 of the Initial Treatment study. DAS28-CRP was based on joint counts, overall participant assessment, and the serum CRP level at each visit. Joint counts included SJC and TJC using the 28 joints count and CRP (mg/L). Total score range: 0 to 9.4, higher score indicated more disease activity. DAS28-CRP ≤3.2 implied low disease activity, >3.2 to 5.1 implied moderate to high disease activity, and <2.6=remission.
DAS28-CRP and Changes From Baseline to Week 24 in DAS28-CRP by Retreatment Course
DAS28-CRP was based on joint counts, overall participant assessment, and the serum CRP level at each visit. Joint counts included SJC and TJC using the 28 joints count and CRP (mg/L). Total score range=0 to 9.4; a higher score indicated more disease activity. A DAS28-CRP score of ≤3.2 implied low disease activity, >3.2 to 5.1 implied moderate to high disease activity, and <2.6=remission.
Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission (DAS28-CRP <2.6) or Low Disease Activity (DAS28-CRP ≤3.2)
Percentage of participants with clinical remission and low disease activity as measured by DAS28-CRP for Arm A and Arm B at Week 24 of the Initial Treatment, at 24 weeks after first re-treatment, and at 24 weeks after second retreatment. DAS28-CRP was based on joint counts, overall participant assessment, and the serum CRP level at each visit. Joint counts included SJC and TJC using the 28 joints count and CRP (mg/L). Total score range=0 to 9.4; a higher score indicated more disease activity. A DAS28-CRP score of ≤3.2 implied low disease activity and <2.6 = remission.
DAS28-CRP AUC Weighted Time
DAS28-CRP was based on joint counts, overall participant assessment, and the serum CRP level at each visit. Joint counts included SJC and TJC using the 28 joints count and CRP (mg/L). Total score range=0 to 9.4; a higher score indicated more disease activity. A DAS28-CRP score of ≤3.2 implied low disease activity, >3.2 to 5.1 implied moderate to high disease activity, and <2.6=remission.
Time to Achieve DAS28-CRP Remission After the First Course
DAS28-CRP was based on joint counts, overall participant assessment, and the serum CRP level at each visit. Joint counts included SJC and TJC using the 28 joints count and CRP (mg/L). Total score range=0 to 9.4; a higher score indicated more disease activity. A DAS28-CRP <2.6=remission.
Time to Achieve DAS28-CRP Remission After Retreatment
DAS28-CRP was based on joint counts, overall participant assessment, and the serum CRP level at each visit. Joint counts included SJC and TJC using the 28 joints count and CRP (mg/L). Total score range=0 to 9.4; a higher score indicated more disease activity. A DAS28-CRP <2.6=remission.
Time to Achieve DAS28-CRP ≤3.2 After the First Course of Treatment
DAS28-CRP was based on joint counts, overall participant assessment, and the serum CRP level at each visit. Joint counts included SJC and TJC using the 28 joints count and CRP (mg/L). Total score range=0 to 9.4; a higher score indicated more disease activity. A DAS28-CRP score of ≤3.2 implied low disease activity.
Time to Achieve DAS28-CRP ≤3.2 After Retreatment
DAS28-CRP was based on joint counts, overall participant assessment, and the serum CRP level at each visit. Joint counts included SJC and TJC using the 28 joints count and CRP (mg/L). Total score range=0 to 9.4; a higher score indicated more disease activity. A DAS28-CRP score of ≤3.2 implied low disease activity.
Duration of DAS28-CRP Remission After the First Course of Treatment
DAS28-CRP was based on joint counts, overall participant assessment, and the serum CRP level at each visit. Joint counts included SJC and TJC using the 28 joints count and CRP (mg/L). Total score range=0 to 9.4; a higher score indicated more disease activity. A DAS28-CRP <2.6=remission.
Duration of DAS28-CRP Remission After Retreatment
DAS28-CRP was based on joint counts, overall participant assessment, and the serum CRP level at each visit. Joint counts included SJC and TJC using the 28 joints count and CRP (mg/L). Total score range=0 to 9.4; a higher score indicated more disease activity. A DAS28-CRP <2.6=remission.
Duration of DAS28-CRP ≤3.2 After the First Course of Treatment
DAS28-CRP was based on joint counts, overall participant assessment, and the serum CRP level at each visit. Joint counts included SJC and TJC using the 28 joints count and CRP (mg/L). Total score range=0 to 9.4; a higher score indicated more disease activity. A DAS28-CRP score of ≤3.2 implied low disease activity.
Duration of DAS28-CRP ≤3.2 After Retreatment
DAS28-CRP was based on joint counts, overall participant assessment, and the serum CRP level at each visit. Joint counts included SJC and TJC using the 28 joints count and CRP (mg/L). Total score range=0 to 9.4; a higher score indicated more disease activity. A DAS28-CRP score of ≤3.2 implied low disease activity.
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20%, 50%, and 70% Improvement (ACR20/ACR50/ACR70)
ACR20/50/70 response defined as ≥20%, 50%, or 70% improvement, respectively, in TJC and SJC, and ≥20%, 50%, or 70% improvement, respectively, in at least 3 of 5 remaining ACR core measures: Patient Global Assessment of Pain, Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity, Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (on a visual analog scale [VAS]); Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI); and CRP.
Percentage of Participants Achieving a Response During Initial Treatment by European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Category
DAS28-based EULAR response criteria were used to measure individual response as no response, good, and moderate, depending on the extent of change from baseline and the level of disease activity reached. Good responders = change from baseline >1.2 with a DAS28 score of ≤3.2; moderate responders = change from baseline >1.2 with a DAS28 score of >3.2 to ≤ 5.1 or change from baseline >0.6 to ≤1.2 with a DAS28 score of ≤5.1; non-responders = change from baseline ≤0.6 or change from baseline >0.6 and ≤ 1.2 with a DAS28 score of >5.1.
Percentage of Participants Achieving a Response During Retreatment by EULAR Category
DAS28-based EULAR response criteria were used to measure individual response as no response, good, and moderate, depending on the extent of change from baseline and the level of disease activity reached. Good responders = change from baseline >1.2 with a DAS28 score of ≤3.2; moderate responders = change from baseline >1.2 with a DAS28 score of >3.2 to ≤ 5.1 or change from baseline >0.6 to ≤1.2 with a DAS28 score of ≤5.1; non-responders = change from baseline ≤0.6 or change from baseline >0.6 and ≤ 1.2 with a DAS28 score of >5.1.
Percentage of Participants With Rheumatoid Factor (RF) at 24 Weeks After Treatment
RF is the auto antibody directed against immunoglobulin G (IgG) and its concentration is observed in human serum or plasma. RF value higher than 20 international units per milliliter (IU/mL) is considered positive.
Percentage of Participants With Anti-cyclic Citrullinated Protein (Anti-CCP) Antibodies at 24 Weeks After Treatment
Anti-CCP antibodies are auto antibodies (antibodies directed against 1 or more of an individual's own proteins) that are frequently detected in the blood of rheumatoid arthritis participants. Anti-CCP antibodies value higher than 10 U/mL is considered positive.
Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity
The Physician's Global Assessment of disease activity is assessed on a 0 to 100 millimeter (mm) horizontal VAS by the physician. The left-hand extreme of the line equals 0 mm, and is described as "no disease activity" (symptom-free and no arthritis symptoms) and the right-hand extreme equals 100 mm as "maximum disease activity" (maximum arthritis disease activity). Physicians were asked to mark the line and the distance from the left edge was measured. Higher values correspond to worst state of participant (high disease activity).
Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity
The Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity is assessed on a 0 to 100 mm horizontal VAS by the participant. The left-hand extreme of the line equals 0 mm, and is described as "no disease activity" (symptom-free and no arthritis symptoms) and the right-hand extreme equals 100 mm as "maximum disease activity" (maximum arthritis disease activity). Higher values correspond to worst state of participant (high disease activity).
Patient's Global Assessment of Pain
The participants assessed their pain over the past 24 hours on a 0 to 100 mm horizontal VAS. The left-hand extreme of the line equals 0 mm, and is described as "no pain" and the right-hand extreme equals 100 mm as "unbearable pain". Participants were asked to mark the line and the distance from the left edge was measured. Higher values correspond to worst state of participant (high pain levels).
Participant Assessment of Fatigue
Participants were asked to rate their level of fatigue over the last 7 days on a 100-mm VAS. The left-hand extreme of the line equals 0 mm, and is described as "no fatigue" and the right-hand extreme equals 100 mm as "extreme fatigue". Participants were asked to mark the line and the distance from the left edge was measured. Higher values correspond to worst state of participant (high levels of fatigue).
Cortisone Intake AUC (Time- and Weight-Weighted)
All cortisone intakes (in mg) were taken into account (oral, IV [including the cortisone administration before the rituximab infusion], intramuscular, and intra-articular).
Total Mean Dose of Cortisone Between Week 24 and Week 104
All cortisone intakes were taken into account, including oral, IV (including the cortisone administration before the rituximab infusion), intramuscular and intra-articular.
HAQ-DI Scores
HAQ-DI: participant-reported assessment of ability to perform tasks in 8 categories of daily living activities: dress/groom; arise; eat; walk; reach; grip; hygiene; and common activities over past week. Each item scored on 4-point scale from 0 to 3: 0=no difficulty; 1=some difficulty; 2=much difficulty; 3=unable to do. Overall score was computed as the sum of domain scores and divided by the number of domains answered. Total possible score range 0-3 where 0=least difficulty and 3 extreme difficulty.
Short Form 12 (SF-12) Physical Health Composite Score
Physical and Mental Health Composite Scores of SF-12 were computed using the scores of 12 questions and range from 0 to 100, where a 0 score indicates the lowest level of health measured by the scales and 100 indicates the highest level of health.
SF-12 Mental Health Composite Score
Mental Health Composite Scores of SF-12 were computed using the scores of 12 questions and range from 0 to 100, where a 0 score indicates the lowest level of health measured by the scales and 100 indicates the highest level of health.
Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale (MOS-Sleep) Composite Sleep Problems 6 (SLP6) Index
The MOS Sleep Scale measures most constructs of sleep. The scale has a battery of questions to measure specific aspects of sleep in participants with co-morbidities. The SLP6 index is comprised of 6 items: provides a summary of sleep problems and contains questions from the sleep disturbance, sleep adequacy, respiratory impairment, and somnolence domains. The SLP6 index score ranges between 0 and 100, with higher values corresponding to more sleep problems.
Percentage of Participants Reporting Acceptable Disease Activity Symptom State Assessed Using Patient Acceptable and Unacceptable Symptom State (PASS)
Percentage of participants reporting acceptable symptom state: acceptance to remain for the rest of their lives with the level of disease activity they had during the last 48 hours; and unacceptable symptom state: not able to remain for the rest of their lives with the level of disease activity they had during the last 48 hours. In the case of missing data, participants who withdrew from the study because of inefficacy or toxicity were considered "unacceptable".
Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity in Participants Reporting Acceptable Symptoms Using PASS
The Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity assessed in participants reporting acceptable symptom state using PASS (acceptance to remain for the rest of their lives with the level of disease activity they had during the last 48 hours) on a 0 to 100 mm horizontal VAS by the participant. The left-hand extreme of the line equals 0 mm, and is described as "no disease activity" (symptom-free and no arthritis symptoms) and the right-hand extreme equals 100 mm as "maximum disease activity" (maximum arthritis disease activity). Higher values correspond to worst state of participant (high disease activity).
Percentage of Participants With Minimum Clinically Important Improvement (MCII) in Disease Activity
Participants were asked how their disease activity had been during the last 48 hours compared to baseline. Those participants that reported improvement assessed how important this improvement was to them; range: very important, moderately important, slightly important, or not at all important. Binary response options: 1=improved very important, or improved moderately important; 2=slightly important, not at all important, no change, or worse-more disease activity.
Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity in Participants With MCII
The Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity was assessed in participants reporting MCII on a 0 to 100 mm horizontal VAS by the participant. The left-hand extreme of the line equals 0 mm, and is described as "no disease activity" (symptom-free and no arthritis symptoms) and the right-hand extreme equals 100 mm as "maximum disease activity" (maximum arthritis disease activity). Higher values correspond to worst state of participant (high disease activity).
Percentage of Participants Reporting Acceptable Symptom State in Functioning Assessed Using PASS
Percentage of participants reporting acceptable symptom state: acceptance to remain for the rest of their lives with the level of function they had during the last 48 hours; and unacceptable symptom state: not able to remain for the rest of their lives with the level of function they had during the last 48 hours. In the case of missing data, participants who withdrew from the study because of inefficacy or toxicity were considered "unacceptable".
HAQ-DI Scores in Participants Reporting Acceptable Function Using PASS
HAQ-DI was assessed in participants reporting acceptable symptom state using PASS (acceptance to remain for the rest of their lives with the level of disease activity they had during the last 48 hours). HAQ-DI is a participant-reported assessment of ability to perform tasks in 8 categories of daily living activities: dress/groom; arise; eat; walk; reach; grip; hygiene; and common activities over past week. Each item scored on 4-point scale from 0 to 3: 0=no difficulty; 1=some difficulty; 2=much difficulty; 3=unable to do. Overall score was computed as the sum of domain scores and divided by the number of domains answered. Total possible score range 0-3 where 0=least difficulty and 3 extreme difficulty.
Percentage of Participants With MCII in Functioning
Participants were asked how their functioning had been during the last 48 hours compared to baseline. Those participants that reported improvement assessed how important this improvement was to them; range: very important, moderately important, slightly important, or not at all important. Binary response options: 1=improved very important, or improved moderately important; 2=slightly important, not at all important, no change, or worse.
Change From Baseline in HAQ-DI in Participants With MCII
HAQ-DI was assessed in participants with MCII. HAQ-DI is a participant-reported assessment of ability to perform tasks in 8 categories of daily living activities: dress/groom; arise; eat; walk; reach; grip; hygiene; and common activities over past week. Each item scored on 4-point scale from 0 to 3: 0=no difficulty; 1=some difficulty; 2=much difficulty; 3=unable to do. Overall score was computed as the sum of domain scores and divided by the number of domains answered. Total possible score range 0-3 where 0=least difficulty and 3 extreme difficulty.
Percentage of Participants With Acceptable Symptom State in Pain Assessed Using PASS
Percentage of participants reporting acceptable symptom state: acceptance to remain for the rest of their lives with the level of pain they had during the last 48 hours; and unacceptable symptom state: not able to remain for the rest of their lives with the level of pain they had during the last 48 hours. In the case of missing data, participants who withdrew from the study because of inefficacy or toxicity were considered "unacceptable".
Patient Global Assessment of Pain in Participants Reporting Acceptable Symptoms Using PASS
Patient Global Assessment of Pain assessed in participants reporting acceptable symptom state using PASS (acceptance to remain for the rest of their lives with the level of pain they had during the last 48 hours) on a 0 to 100 mm horizontal VAS by the participant. The left-hand extreme of the line equals 0 mm, and is described as "no pain" and the right-hand extreme equals 100 mm as "unbearable pain". Higher values correspond to worst state of participant (high pain levels).
Percentage of Participants With MCII in Pain
Participants were asked how their pain had been during the last 48 hours compared to baseline. Those participants that reported improvement assessed how important this improvement was to them; range: very important, moderately important, slightly important, or not at all important. Binary response options: 1=improved very important, or improved moderately important; 2=slightly important, not at all important, no change, or worse pain.
Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Pain in Participants With MCII
The participants assessed their pain over the past 24 hours on a 0 to 100 mm horizontal VAS. The left-hand extreme of the line equals 0 mm, and is described as "no pain" and the right-hand extreme equals 100 mm as "unbearable pain". Participants were asked to mark the line and the distance from the left edge was measured. Higher values correspond to worst state of participant (high pain levels).

Full Information

First Posted
May 18, 2010
Last Updated
September 10, 2014
Sponsor
Hoffmann-La Roche
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01126541
Brief Title
SMART Study: A Study of Re-treatment With MabThera (Rituximab) in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis Who Have Failed on Anti-TNF Alfa Therapy
Official Title
A Comparative Study to Assess the Effect of Retreatment With 2 Doses of MabThera on Disease Activity Score in Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Who Have Had an Inadequate Response or Intolerance to antiTNF-alfa Therapy.(SMART)
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
September 2014
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
September 2006 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
November 2011 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
November 2011 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Hoffmann-La Roche

4. Oversight

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This study will compare the efficacy and safety of re-treatment with 2 doses of MabThera (rituximab) in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who have previously experienced an inadequate response or intolerance to anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) therapies etanercept, infliximab or adalimumab therapy. All patients will receive infusions of 1000 mg intravenous (IV) MabThera on Days 1 and 15; at Week 24 patients who have demonstrated a moderate or good response will be randomized to receive re-treatment with either 1 or 2 additional infusions of 1000 mg IV MabThera. The anticipated time on study treatment is 2+ years, and the target sample size is 100-500 individuals.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Rheumatoid Arthritis

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
224 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
A
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
1000 mg IV rituximab
Arm Title
B
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
2 x 1000 mg IV rituximab
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
rituximab
Other Intervention Name(s)
MabThera/Rituxan
Intervention Description
Arm A: 1000 mg IV (one infusion) every 2 months \nArm B: 2 x 1000 mg IV (2 infusions) every 2 months
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joints Count and C-Reactive Protein (DAS28-CRP) Area Under the Curve (AUC) at Week 104
Description
DAS28-CRP was based on joint counts, overall participant assessment, and serum CRP levels (measured in milligrams per liter [mg/L]) at each visit. Joint counts included swollen joint count (SJC) and tender joint count (TJC). Total score range was 0 to 9.4; a higher score indicated more disease activity. DAS28-CRP less than or equal to (≤)3.2 implied low disease activity, >3.2 to 5.1 implied moderate to high disease activity, and less than (<)2.6 equals (=) remission. The AUC of all DAS28-CRP values between Day 1 and Week 104 (15 values of protocol visits) was calculated using the trapeze method (AUC between t1 and t2=(t2-t1)*((DAS28-CRP at t1 + DAS28-CRP at t2)/2). The true visit dates were used to calculate the time between 2 DAS28-CRP evaluations. All the AUC were censored at Week 104 (linear extrapolation using the 2 last DAS28-CRP values (Weeks 96 and 104) to obtain the "true" DAS28-CRP value at the "true" Week 104).
Time Frame
Week 104
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
DAS28-CRP During the Initial Treatment
Description
Mean DAS28-CRP at Week 24 of the Initial Treatment study. DAS28-CRP was based on joint counts, overall participant assessment, and the serum CRP level at each visit. Joint counts included SJC and TJC using the 28 joints count and CRP (mg/L). Total score range: 0 to 9.4, higher score indicated more disease activity. DAS28-CRP ≤3.2 implied low disease activity, >3.2 to 5.1 implied moderate to high disease activity, and <2.6=remission.
Time Frame
Days 1 and 15, and Weeks 6, 12, and 24
Title
DAS28-CRP and Changes From Baseline to Week 24 in DAS28-CRP by Retreatment Course
Description
DAS28-CRP was based on joint counts, overall participant assessment, and the serum CRP level at each visit. Joint counts included SJC and TJC using the 28 joints count and CRP (mg/L). Total score range=0 to 9.4; a higher score indicated more disease activity. A DAS28-CRP score of ≤3.2 implied low disease activity, >3.2 to 5.1 implied moderate to high disease activity, and <2.6=remission.
Time Frame
Day 1, 24 weeks following each infusion up to 72 Weeks
Title
Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission (DAS28-CRP <2.6) or Low Disease Activity (DAS28-CRP ≤3.2)
Description
Percentage of participants with clinical remission and low disease activity as measured by DAS28-CRP for Arm A and Arm B at Week 24 of the Initial Treatment, at 24 weeks after first re-treatment, and at 24 weeks after second retreatment. DAS28-CRP was based on joint counts, overall participant assessment, and the serum CRP level at each visit. Joint counts included SJC and TJC using the 28 joints count and CRP (mg/L). Total score range=0 to 9.4; a higher score indicated more disease activity. A DAS28-CRP score of ≤3.2 implied low disease activity and <2.6 = remission.
Time Frame
Week 24 of the Initial Treatment, 24 weeks after first retreatment, and 24 weeks after second retreatment
Title
DAS28-CRP AUC Weighted Time
Description
DAS28-CRP was based on joint counts, overall participant assessment, and the serum CRP level at each visit. Joint counts included SJC and TJC using the 28 joints count and CRP (mg/L). Total score range=0 to 9.4; a higher score indicated more disease activity. A DAS28-CRP score of ≤3.2 implied low disease activity, >3.2 to 5.1 implied moderate to high disease activity, and <2.6=remission.
Time Frame
Days 1 and 15, Weeks 6, 12, and 24 and every 8 weeks thereafter through Week 104
Title
Time to Achieve DAS28-CRP Remission After the First Course
Description
DAS28-CRP was based on joint counts, overall participant assessment, and the serum CRP level at each visit. Joint counts included SJC and TJC using the 28 joints count and CRP (mg/L). Total score range=0 to 9.4; a higher score indicated more disease activity. A DAS28-CRP <2.6=remission.
Time Frame
Days 1 and 15, Weeks 6, 12, and 24 and every 8 weeks thereafter through Week 104
Title
Time to Achieve DAS28-CRP Remission After Retreatment
Description
DAS28-CRP was based on joint counts, overall participant assessment, and the serum CRP level at each visit. Joint counts included SJC and TJC using the 28 joints count and CRP (mg/L). Total score range=0 to 9.4; a higher score indicated more disease activity. A DAS28-CRP <2.6=remission.
Time Frame
Days 1 and 15, Weeks 6, 12, and 24 and every 8 weeks thereafter through Week 104
Title
Time to Achieve DAS28-CRP ≤3.2 After the First Course of Treatment
Description
DAS28-CRP was based on joint counts, overall participant assessment, and the serum CRP level at each visit. Joint counts included SJC and TJC using the 28 joints count and CRP (mg/L). Total score range=0 to 9.4; a higher score indicated more disease activity. A DAS28-CRP score of ≤3.2 implied low disease activity.
Time Frame
Days 1 and 15, Weeks 6, 12, and 24 and every 8 weeks thereafter through Week 104
Title
Time to Achieve DAS28-CRP ≤3.2 After Retreatment
Description
DAS28-CRP was based on joint counts, overall participant assessment, and the serum CRP level at each visit. Joint counts included SJC and TJC using the 28 joints count and CRP (mg/L). Total score range=0 to 9.4; a higher score indicated more disease activity. A DAS28-CRP score of ≤3.2 implied low disease activity.
Time Frame
Days 1 and 15, Weeks 6, 12, and 24 and every 8 weeks thereafter through Week 104
Title
Duration of DAS28-CRP Remission After the First Course of Treatment
Description
DAS28-CRP was based on joint counts, overall participant assessment, and the serum CRP level at each visit. Joint counts included SJC and TJC using the 28 joints count and CRP (mg/L). Total score range=0 to 9.4; a higher score indicated more disease activity. A DAS28-CRP <2.6=remission.
Time Frame
Days 1 and 15, Weeks 6, 12, and 24 and every 8 weeks thereafter through Week 104
Title
Duration of DAS28-CRP Remission After Retreatment
Description
DAS28-CRP was based on joint counts, overall participant assessment, and the serum CRP level at each visit. Joint counts included SJC and TJC using the 28 joints count and CRP (mg/L). Total score range=0 to 9.4; a higher score indicated more disease activity. A DAS28-CRP <2.6=remission.
Time Frame
Days 1 and 15, Weeks 6, 12, and 24 and every 8 weeks thereafter through Week 104
Title
Duration of DAS28-CRP ≤3.2 After the First Course of Treatment
Description
DAS28-CRP was based on joint counts, overall participant assessment, and the serum CRP level at each visit. Joint counts included SJC and TJC using the 28 joints count and CRP (mg/L). Total score range=0 to 9.4; a higher score indicated more disease activity. A DAS28-CRP score of ≤3.2 implied low disease activity.
Time Frame
Days 1 and 15, Weeks 6, 12, and 24 and every 8 weeks thereafter through Week 104
Title
Duration of DAS28-CRP ≤3.2 After Retreatment
Description
DAS28-CRP was based on joint counts, overall participant assessment, and the serum CRP level at each visit. Joint counts included SJC and TJC using the 28 joints count and CRP (mg/L). Total score range=0 to 9.4; a higher score indicated more disease activity. A DAS28-CRP score of ≤3.2 implied low disease activity.
Time Frame
Days 1 and 15, Weeks 6, 12, and 24 and every 8 weeks thereafter through Week 104
Title
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20%, 50%, and 70% Improvement (ACR20/ACR50/ACR70)
Description
ACR20/50/70 response defined as ≥20%, 50%, or 70% improvement, respectively, in TJC and SJC, and ≥20%, 50%, or 70% improvement, respectively, in at least 3 of 5 remaining ACR core measures: Patient Global Assessment of Pain, Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity, Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (on a visual analog scale [VAS]); Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI); and CRP.
Time Frame
Week 24 of the initial treatment, 24 weeks after first retreatment, and 24 weeks after second retreatment
Title
Percentage of Participants Achieving a Response During Initial Treatment by European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Category
Description
DAS28-based EULAR response criteria were used to measure individual response as no response, good, and moderate, depending on the extent of change from baseline and the level of disease activity reached. Good responders = change from baseline >1.2 with a DAS28 score of ≤3.2; moderate responders = change from baseline >1.2 with a DAS28 score of >3.2 to ≤ 5.1 or change from baseline >0.6 to ≤1.2 with a DAS28 score of ≤5.1; non-responders = change from baseline ≤0.6 or change from baseline >0.6 and ≤ 1.2 with a DAS28 score of >5.1.
Time Frame
Day 15, Weeks 6, 12, and 24
Title
Percentage of Participants Achieving a Response During Retreatment by EULAR Category
Description
DAS28-based EULAR response criteria were used to measure individual response as no response, good, and moderate, depending on the extent of change from baseline and the level of disease activity reached. Good responders = change from baseline >1.2 with a DAS28 score of ≤3.2; moderate responders = change from baseline >1.2 with a DAS28 score of >3.2 to ≤ 5.1 or change from baseline >0.6 to ≤1.2 with a DAS28 score of ≤5.1; non-responders = change from baseline ≤0.6 or change from baseline >0.6 and ≤ 1.2 with a DAS28 score of >5.1.
Time Frame
Week 24, 24 weeks after 1st retreatment, 24 weeks after 2nd retreatment
Title
Percentage of Participants With Rheumatoid Factor (RF) at 24 Weeks After Treatment
Description
RF is the auto antibody directed against immunoglobulin G (IgG) and its concentration is observed in human serum or plasma. RF value higher than 20 international units per milliliter (IU/mL) is considered positive.
Time Frame
Week 24 of the initial treatment, 24 weeks after first re-treatment, and 24 weeks after second retreatment
Title
Percentage of Participants With Anti-cyclic Citrullinated Protein (Anti-CCP) Antibodies at 24 Weeks After Treatment
Description
Anti-CCP antibodies are auto antibodies (antibodies directed against 1 or more of an individual's own proteins) that are frequently detected in the blood of rheumatoid arthritis participants. Anti-CCP antibodies value higher than 10 U/mL is considered positive.
Time Frame
Week 24 of the initial treatment, 24 weeks after first re-treatment, and 24 weeks after second retreatment
Title
Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity
Description
The Physician's Global Assessment of disease activity is assessed on a 0 to 100 millimeter (mm) horizontal VAS by the physician. The left-hand extreme of the line equals 0 mm, and is described as "no disease activity" (symptom-free and no arthritis symptoms) and the right-hand extreme equals 100 mm as "maximum disease activity" (maximum arthritis disease activity). Physicians were asked to mark the line and the distance from the left edge was measured. Higher values correspond to worst state of participant (high disease activity).
Time Frame
Day 1 and Week 24 of initial treatment, before 1st retreatment, at 1st retreatment, and at 12 and 24 weeks after 1st retreatment
Title
Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity
Description
The Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity is assessed on a 0 to 100 mm horizontal VAS by the participant. The left-hand extreme of the line equals 0 mm, and is described as "no disease activity" (symptom-free and no arthritis symptoms) and the right-hand extreme equals 100 mm as "maximum disease activity" (maximum arthritis disease activity). Higher values correspond to worst state of participant (high disease activity).
Time Frame
Day 1 and Week 24 of initial treatment, before 1st retreatment, at 1st retreatment, and at 12 and 24 weeks after 1st retreatment
Title
Patient's Global Assessment of Pain
Description
The participants assessed their pain over the past 24 hours on a 0 to 100 mm horizontal VAS. The left-hand extreme of the line equals 0 mm, and is described as "no pain" and the right-hand extreme equals 100 mm as "unbearable pain". Participants were asked to mark the line and the distance from the left edge was measured. Higher values correspond to worst state of participant (high pain levels).
Time Frame
Day 1 and Week 24 of initial treatment, before 1st retreatment, at 1st retreatment, and at 12 and 24 weeks after 1st retreatment
Title
Participant Assessment of Fatigue
Description
Participants were asked to rate their level of fatigue over the last 7 days on a 100-mm VAS. The left-hand extreme of the line equals 0 mm, and is described as "no fatigue" and the right-hand extreme equals 100 mm as "extreme fatigue". Participants were asked to mark the line and the distance from the left edge was measured. Higher values correspond to worst state of participant (high levels of fatigue).
Time Frame
Day 1 and Week 24 of initial treatment, before 1st retreatment, at 1st retreatment, and at 12 and 24 weeks after 1st retreatment
Title
Cortisone Intake AUC (Time- and Weight-Weighted)
Description
All cortisone intakes (in mg) were taken into account (oral, IV [including the cortisone administration before the rituximab infusion], intramuscular, and intra-articular).
Time Frame
Day 1 (each infusion), Week 24, Week 104
Title
Total Mean Dose of Cortisone Between Week 24 and Week 104
Description
All cortisone intakes were taken into account, including oral, IV (including the cortisone administration before the rituximab infusion), intramuscular and intra-articular.
Time Frame
Week 24 to Week 104
Title
HAQ-DI Scores
Description
HAQ-DI: participant-reported assessment of ability to perform tasks in 8 categories of daily living activities: dress/groom; arise; eat; walk; reach; grip; hygiene; and common activities over past week. Each item scored on 4-point scale from 0 to 3: 0=no difficulty; 1=some difficulty; 2=much difficulty; 3=unable to do. Overall score was computed as the sum of domain scores and divided by the number of domains answered. Total possible score range 0-3 where 0=least difficulty and 3 extreme difficulty.
Time Frame
Day 1 and Week 24 of initial treatment, before 1st retreatment, at 1st retreatment, and at 12 and 24 weeks after 1st retreatment
Title
Short Form 12 (SF-12) Physical Health Composite Score
Description
Physical and Mental Health Composite Scores of SF-12 were computed using the scores of 12 questions and range from 0 to 100, where a 0 score indicates the lowest level of health measured by the scales and 100 indicates the highest level of health.
Time Frame
Day 1 and Week 24 of initial treatment, before 1st retreatment, at 1st retreatment, and at 12 and 24 weeks after 1st retreatment
Title
SF-12 Mental Health Composite Score
Description
Mental Health Composite Scores of SF-12 were computed using the scores of 12 questions and range from 0 to 100, where a 0 score indicates the lowest level of health measured by the scales and 100 indicates the highest level of health.
Time Frame
Day 1 and Week 24 of initial treatment, before 1st retreatment, at 1st retreatment, and at 12 and 24 weeks after 1st retreatment
Title
Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale (MOS-Sleep) Composite Sleep Problems 6 (SLP6) Index
Description
The MOS Sleep Scale measures most constructs of sleep. The scale has a battery of questions to measure specific aspects of sleep in participants with co-morbidities. The SLP6 index is comprised of 6 items: provides a summary of sleep problems and contains questions from the sleep disturbance, sleep adequacy, respiratory impairment, and somnolence domains. The SLP6 index score ranges between 0 and 100, with higher values corresponding to more sleep problems.
Time Frame
Day 1 and Week 24 of initial treatment, before 1st retreatment, at 1st retreatment, and at 12 and 24 weeks after 1st retreatment
Title
Percentage of Participants Reporting Acceptable Disease Activity Symptom State Assessed Using Patient Acceptable and Unacceptable Symptom State (PASS)
Description
Percentage of participants reporting acceptable symptom state: acceptance to remain for the rest of their lives with the level of disease activity they had during the last 48 hours; and unacceptable symptom state: not able to remain for the rest of their lives with the level of disease activity they had during the last 48 hours. In the case of missing data, participants who withdrew from the study because of inefficacy or toxicity were considered "unacceptable".
Time Frame
Week 24, 12 and 24 weeks after 1st retreatment
Title
Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity in Participants Reporting Acceptable Symptoms Using PASS
Description
The Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity assessed in participants reporting acceptable symptom state using PASS (acceptance to remain for the rest of their lives with the level of disease activity they had during the last 48 hours) on a 0 to 100 mm horizontal VAS by the participant. The left-hand extreme of the line equals 0 mm, and is described as "no disease activity" (symptom-free and no arthritis symptoms) and the right-hand extreme equals 100 mm as "maximum disease activity" (maximum arthritis disease activity). Higher values correspond to worst state of participant (high disease activity).
Time Frame
Week 24, 12 and 24 weeks after 1st retreatment
Title
Percentage of Participants With Minimum Clinically Important Improvement (MCII) in Disease Activity
Description
Participants were asked how their disease activity had been during the last 48 hours compared to baseline. Those participants that reported improvement assessed how important this improvement was to them; range: very important, moderately important, slightly important, or not at all important. Binary response options: 1=improved very important, or improved moderately important; 2=slightly important, not at all important, no change, or worse-more disease activity.
Time Frame
Week 24, 12 and 24 weeks after 1st retreatment
Title
Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity in Participants With MCII
Description
The Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity was assessed in participants reporting MCII on a 0 to 100 mm horizontal VAS by the participant. The left-hand extreme of the line equals 0 mm, and is described as "no disease activity" (symptom-free and no arthritis symptoms) and the right-hand extreme equals 100 mm as "maximum disease activity" (maximum arthritis disease activity). Higher values correspond to worst state of participant (high disease activity).
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 24, 12 and 24 weeks after 1st retreatment
Title
Percentage of Participants Reporting Acceptable Symptom State in Functioning Assessed Using PASS
Description
Percentage of participants reporting acceptable symptom state: acceptance to remain for the rest of their lives with the level of function they had during the last 48 hours; and unacceptable symptom state: not able to remain for the rest of their lives with the level of function they had during the last 48 hours. In the case of missing data, participants who withdrew from the study because of inefficacy or toxicity were considered "unacceptable".
Time Frame
Week 24, 12 and 24 weeks after 1st retreatment
Title
HAQ-DI Scores in Participants Reporting Acceptable Function Using PASS
Description
HAQ-DI was assessed in participants reporting acceptable symptom state using PASS (acceptance to remain for the rest of their lives with the level of disease activity they had during the last 48 hours). HAQ-DI is a participant-reported assessment of ability to perform tasks in 8 categories of daily living activities: dress/groom; arise; eat; walk; reach; grip; hygiene; and common activities over past week. Each item scored on 4-point scale from 0 to 3: 0=no difficulty; 1=some difficulty; 2=much difficulty; 3=unable to do. Overall score was computed as the sum of domain scores and divided by the number of domains answered. Total possible score range 0-3 where 0=least difficulty and 3 extreme difficulty.
Time Frame
Week 24, 12 and 24 weeks after 1st retreatment
Title
Percentage of Participants With MCII in Functioning
Description
Participants were asked how their functioning had been during the last 48 hours compared to baseline. Those participants that reported improvement assessed how important this improvement was to them; range: very important, moderately important, slightly important, or not at all important. Binary response options: 1=improved very important, or improved moderately important; 2=slightly important, not at all important, no change, or worse.
Time Frame
Week 24, 12 and 24 weeks after 1st retreatment
Title
Change From Baseline in HAQ-DI in Participants With MCII
Description
HAQ-DI was assessed in participants with MCII. HAQ-DI is a participant-reported assessment of ability to perform tasks in 8 categories of daily living activities: dress/groom; arise; eat; walk; reach; grip; hygiene; and common activities over past week. Each item scored on 4-point scale from 0 to 3: 0=no difficulty; 1=some difficulty; 2=much difficulty; 3=unable to do. Overall score was computed as the sum of domain scores and divided by the number of domains answered. Total possible score range 0-3 where 0=least difficulty and 3 extreme difficulty.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 24, 12 and 24 weeks after 1st retreatment
Title
Percentage of Participants With Acceptable Symptom State in Pain Assessed Using PASS
Description
Percentage of participants reporting acceptable symptom state: acceptance to remain for the rest of their lives with the level of pain they had during the last 48 hours; and unacceptable symptom state: not able to remain for the rest of their lives with the level of pain they had during the last 48 hours. In the case of missing data, participants who withdrew from the study because of inefficacy or toxicity were considered "unacceptable".
Time Frame
Week 24, 12 and 24 weeks after 1st retreatment
Title
Patient Global Assessment of Pain in Participants Reporting Acceptable Symptoms Using PASS
Description
Patient Global Assessment of Pain assessed in participants reporting acceptable symptom state using PASS (acceptance to remain for the rest of their lives with the level of pain they had during the last 48 hours) on a 0 to 100 mm horizontal VAS by the participant. The left-hand extreme of the line equals 0 mm, and is described as "no pain" and the right-hand extreme equals 100 mm as "unbearable pain". Higher values correspond to worst state of participant (high pain levels).
Time Frame
Week 24, 12 and 24 weeks after 1st retreatment
Title
Percentage of Participants With MCII in Pain
Description
Participants were asked how their pain had been during the last 48 hours compared to baseline. Those participants that reported improvement assessed how important this improvement was to them; range: very important, moderately important, slightly important, or not at all important. Binary response options: 1=improved very important, or improved moderately important; 2=slightly important, not at all important, no change, or worse pain.
Time Frame
Week 24, 12 and 24 weeks after 1st retreatment
Title
Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Pain in Participants With MCII
Description
The participants assessed their pain over the past 24 hours on a 0 to 100 mm horizontal VAS. The left-hand extreme of the line equals 0 mm, and is described as "no pain" and the right-hand extreme equals 100 mm as "unbearable pain". Participants were asked to mark the line and the distance from the left edge was measured. Higher values correspond to worst state of participant (high pain levels).
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 24, 12 and 24 weeks after 1st retreatment

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Adult patients >18 years of age RA for >=6 months Receiving outpatient treatment Ongoing treatment with methotrexate for >=3 months, stable for >=1 month Inadequate response or intolerance to etanercept, infliximab or adalimumab Exclusion Criteria: Previous treatment with MabThera Concurrent treatment with any anti TNF-alfa therapy or biologic therapy Previous treatment with any investigational cell-depleting therapies
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Clinical Trials
Organizational Affiliation
Hoffmann-La Roche
Official's Role
Study Chair
Facility Information:
City
Abbeville
ZIP/Postal Code
80142
Country
France
City
Agen
ZIP/Postal Code
47923
Country
France
City
Aix En Provence
ZIP/Postal Code
13616
Country
France
City
Aix Les Bains
ZIP/Postal Code
73106
Country
France
City
Amiens
ZIP/Postal Code
80054
Country
France
City
Belfort
ZIP/Postal Code
90016
Country
France
City
Berck
ZIP/Postal Code
62600
Country
France
City
Bobigny
ZIP/Postal Code
93009
Country
France
City
Bois-guillaume
ZIP/Postal Code
76233
Country
France
City
Boulogne-billancourt
ZIP/Postal Code
92104
Country
France
City
Brest
ZIP/Postal Code
29609
Country
France
City
Caen
ZIP/Postal Code
14033
Country
France
City
Cahors
ZIP/Postal Code
46005
Country
France
City
Clermont-ferrand
ZIP/Postal Code
63003
Country
France
City
Corbeil-essonnes
ZIP/Postal Code
91106
Country
France
City
Echirolles
ZIP/Postal Code
38434
Country
France
City
La Roche Sur Yon
ZIP/Postal Code
85925
Country
France
City
Le Kremlin Bicetre
ZIP/Postal Code
94275
Country
France
City
Libourne
ZIP/Postal Code
33505
Country
France
City
Lievin
ZIP/Postal Code
62800
Country
France
City
Lille
ZIP/Postal Code
59037
Country
France
City
Limoges
ZIP/Postal Code
87042
Country
France
City
Lomme
ZIP/Postal Code
59462
Country
France
City
Lyon
ZIP/Postal Code
69365
Country
France
City
Marseille
ZIP/Postal Code
13013
Country
France
City
Montivilliers
ZIP/Postal Code
76290
Country
France
City
Montpellier
ZIP/Postal Code
34295
Country
France
City
Nantes
ZIP/Postal Code
44035
Country
France
City
Narbonne
ZIP/Postal Code
11108
Country
France
City
Nice
ZIP/Postal Code
06202
Country
France
City
Paris
ZIP/Postal Code
75019
Country
France
City
Paris
ZIP/Postal Code
75475
Country
France
City
Paris
ZIP/Postal Code
75571
Country
France
City
Paris
ZIP/Postal Code
75651
Country
France
City
Paris
ZIP/Postal Code
75674
Country
France
City
Paris
ZIP/Postal Code
75679
Country
France
City
Paris
ZIP/Postal Code
75877
Country
France
City
PAU
ZIP/Postal Code
64046
Country
France
City
Perpignan
ZIP/Postal Code
66046
Country
France
City
Pessac
ZIP/Postal Code
33600
Country
France
City
Pierre Benite
ZIP/Postal Code
69495
Country
France
City
Poitiers
ZIP/Postal Code
86021
Country
France
City
Reims
ZIP/Postal Code
51100
Country
France
City
Rennes
ZIP/Postal Code
35203
Country
France
City
Saint-etienne
ZIP/Postal Code
4200
Country
France
City
Strasbourg
ZIP/Postal Code
67098
Country
France
City
Toulon
ZIP/Postal Code
83100
Country
France
City
Toulouse
ZIP/Postal Code
31054
Country
France
City
Toulouse
ZIP/Postal Code
31059
Country
France
City
Valence
ZIP/Postal Code
26000
Country
France
City
Valenciennes
ZIP/Postal Code
59322
Country
France
City
Vandoeuvre-les-nancy
ZIP/Postal Code
54511
Country
France
City
Vannes
ZIP/Postal Code
56017
Country
France

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
28363827
Citation
de Jong TD, Sellam J, Agca R, Vosslamber S, Witte BI, Tsang-A-Sjoe M, Mantel E, Bijlsma JW, Voskuyl AE, Nurmohamed MT, Verweij CL, Mariette X. A multi-parameter response prediction model for rituximab in rheumatoid arthritis. Joint Bone Spine. 2018 Mar;85(2):219-226. doi: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2017.02.015. Epub 2017 Mar 28.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
27964756
Citation
Sellam J, Riviere E, Courties A, Rouzaire PO, Tolusso B, Vital EM, Emery P, Ferraccioli G, Soubrier M, Ly B, Hendel Chavez H, Taoufik Y, Dougados M, Mariette X. Serum IL-33, a new marker predicting response to rituximab in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Res Ther. 2016 Dec 13;18(1):294. doi: 10.1186/s13075-016-1190-z. Erratum In: Arthritis Res Ther. 2017 Jan 23;19(1):11.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
23740460
Citation
Sellam J, Rouanet S, Hendel-Chavez H, Miceli-Richard C, Combe B, Sibilia J, Le Loet X, Tebib J, Jourdan R, Dougados M, Taoufik Y, Mariette X. CCL19, a B cell chemokine, is related to the decrease of blood memory B cells and predicts the clinical response to rituximab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2013 Sep;65(9):2253-61. doi: 10.1002/art.38023.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
23723317
Citation
Mariette X, Rouanet S, Sibilia J, Combe B, Le Loet X, Tebib J, Jourdan R, Dougados M. Evaluation of low-dose rituximab for the retreatment of patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: a non-inferiority randomised controlled trial. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014 Aug;73(8):1508-14. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-203480. Epub 2013 May 30.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
22127692
Citation
Sellam J, Rouanet S, Hendel-Chavez H, Abbed K, Sibilia J, Tebib J, Le Loet X, Combe B, Dougados M, Mariette X, Taoufik Y. Blood memory B cells are disturbed and predict the response to rituximab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2011 Dec;63(12):3692-701. doi: 10.1002/art.30599.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
21225699
Citation
Sellam J, Hendel-Chavez H, Rouanet S, Abbed K, Combe B, Le Loet X, Tebib J, Sibilia J, Taoufik Y, Dougados M, Mariette X. B cell activation biomarkers as predictive factors for the response to rituximab in rheumatoid arthritis: a six-month, national, multicenter, open-label study. Arthritis Rheum. 2011 Apr;63(4):933-8. doi: 10.1002/art.30233.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

SMART Study: A Study of Re-treatment With MabThera (Rituximab) in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis Who Have Failed on Anti-TNF Alfa Therapy

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs