search
Back to results

Safety Extension Study Of Tanezumab When Administered By Subcutaneous Injection To Patients With Osteoarthritis

Primary Purpose

Osteoarthritis

Status
Terminated
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Tanezumab
Tanezumab
Tanezumab
Sponsored by
Pfizer
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Osteoarthritis focused on measuring Musculoskeletal Diseases, Joint Diseases, Arthritis, Rheumatic Diseases

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 99 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Must have participated in specific Phase 3 parent study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Failed screening for parent study, pregnant women, lactating mothers

Sites / Locations

  • Triwest Research Associates

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm Type

Experimental

Experimental

Experimental

Arm Label

Tanezumab 10 mg

Tanezumab 5 mg

Tanezumab 2.5 mg

Arm Description

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a product or medical device; the event need not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment or usage. An SAE is an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent are events between first dose of study drug, up to early termination (Day 107) that were absent before treatment in this study or that worsened relative to pretreatment state.
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities
Laboratory examination included blood chemistry, hematology and urinalysis. Reported results were to include abnormal laboratory findings without regard to baseline abnormality.
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities
Following parameters were analyzed for ECG abnormality: PR interval, QRS interval, QT interval, QT interval corrected using the Bazett's formula (QTcB), QT interval corrected using Fredericia's formula (QTcF), RR interval and heart rate (HR).
Number of Participants With Neurologic Examination Abnormalities
Neurologic examination assessed the strength of groups of muscles of the head and neck, upper limbs and lower limbs, deep tendon reflexes and sensation (tactile, vibration, joint position sense and pin prick) of index fingers and great toes.
Number of Participants With Anti-Drug (Tanezumab) Antibody (ADA)
Human serum ADA samples were analyzed for the presence or absence of anti-tanezumab antibodies by using the semi-quantitative enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).
Number of Participants With Injection Site Reactions
Injection site reactions included: erythema (redness), induration (swelling), ecchymosis (bruising), pruritus (itching) and pain that occurred after the injection has been administered.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, and 64
The WOMAC pain subscale is a 5-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of pain experienced due to osteoarthritis in the index joint in the past 48 hours. It is calculated as the mean of the scores from the 5 individual questions scored on a numerical rating scale (NRS) of 0 to 10, where higher scores indicated higher pain. Total score range for WOMAC pain subscale score is 0 to 10, where higher scores indicated higher pain.
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, and 64
The WOMAC physical function subscale is a 17-item questionnaire used to assess the degree of difficulty experienced due to osteoarthritis in the index joint in the past 48 hours. It is calculated as the mean of the scores from the 17 individual questions scored on a NRS of 0 to 10, where higher scores indicated worse function. Total score range for WOMAC physical function subscale score is 0 to 10, where higher scores indicate worse function. Physical function refers to participant's ability to move around and perform usual activities of daily living.
Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, and 64
PGA: Participants answered the following question: "Considering all the ways your osteoarthritis (OA) in your knee affects you, how are you doing today?" Participants rated their condition by using a 5-point Likert scale: 1) Very Good (asymptomatic and no limitation of normal activities); 2) Good (mild symptoms and no limitation of normal activities); 3) Fair (moderate symptoms and limitation of some normal activities); 4) Poor (severe symptoms and inability to carry out most normal activities); and 5) Very Poor (very severe symptoms which are intolerable and inability to carry out all normal activities).
Percentage of Participants With Outcome Measures in Rheumatoid Arthritis Clinical Trials - Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) Response
OMERACT-OARSI response: >=50 percent (%) improvement from baseline and absolute change from baseline of >=2 units at Week of interest in WOMAC pain or physical function subscale, or at least 2 of the following 3 being true: >=20% improvement from baseline and absolute change from baseline of >=1 unit at Week of interest in 1) WOMAC pain subscale, 2) WOMAC physical function subscale, 3) PGA of osteoarthritis (score: 1-5, higher score=more affected). WOMAC pain, physical function subscales assess amount of pain/difficulty experienced (score: 0-10, higher score=higher pain/difficulty).
Percentage of Participants With At Least 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score
The WOMAC pain subscale is a 5-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of pain experienced due to osteoarthritis in the index joint in the past 48 hours. It was calculated as the mean of the scores from the 5 individual questions scored on a numerical rating scale (NRS) of 0 to 10, where higher scores indicated higher pain. Total score range for WOMAC pain subscale score was 0 to 10, where higher scores indicated higher pain.
Number of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score
The WOMAC pain subscale is a 5-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of pain experienced due to osteoarthritis in the index joint in the past 48 hours. It was calculated as the mean of the scores from the 5 individual questions scored on a numerical rating scale (NRS) of 0 to 10, where higher scores indicated higher pain. Total score range for WOMAC pain subscale score was 0 to 10, where higher scores indicated higher pain.
Percentage of Participants With Improvement of At Least (>=) 2 Point in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis
PGA: Participants answered the following question: "Considering all the ways your OA in your joint affects you, how are you doing today?" Participants rated their condition by using a 5-point Likert scale: 1) Very Good (asymptomatic and no limitation of normal activities); 2) Good (mild symptoms and no limitation of normal activities); 3) Fair (moderate symptoms and limitation of some normal activities); 4) Poor (severe symptoms and inability to carry out most normal activities); and 5) Very Poor (very severe symptoms which are intolerable and inability to carry out all normal activities).
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, and 64
The WOMAC stiffness subscale is a 2-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of stiffness experienced in the index joint in the past 48 hours. It was calculated as the mean of the scores from the 2 individual questions scored on NRS of 0 to 10; where higher scores indicated more stiffness. Total score range for WOMAC stiffness subscale score is 0 to 10, where higher scores indicated more stiffness. Stiffness is defined as a sensation of decreased ease in movement of the index joint.
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, and 64
WOMAC: self-administered, disease-specific 24-item questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain (5 items), stiffness (2 items) and physical function (17 items) in participants with osteoarthritis. WOMAC average score was the mean of WOMAC pain, physical function and stiffness subscale scores and ranges from 0 to 10, where higher score indicated worse response.
Change From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Item (Pain When Walking on a Flat Surface) at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, and 64
Participants answered: "How much pain have you had when walking on a flat surface?" Participants responded by using a NRS of 0 to 10, where 0 = no pain and 10 = extreme pain.
Change From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Item (Pain When Going Up or Down Stairs) at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, and 64
Participants answered: "How much pain have you had when going up or down stairs?" Participants responded by using a NRS of 0 to 10, where 0 = no pain and 10 = extreme pain.
Time to Discontinuation Due to Lack of Efficacy
Number of Participants Who Received Concomitant Analgesic Medication for Osteoarthritis Treatment
Permissible concomitant analgesic medications included Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved opioids, topical analgesics, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), capsaicin products, oral/injectable corticosteroids and viscosupplementation (for example, hyaluronan) and were to be prescribed as per investigator's discretion.
Days Per Week of Concomitant Analgesic Medication Usage for Osteoarthritis Treatment
Permissible concomitant analgesic medications included Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved opioids, topical analgesics, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), capsaicin products, oral/injectable corticosteroids and viscosupplementation (for example, hyaluronan) and were to be prescribed as per investigator's discretion.
Tanezumab Plasma Concentration
Nerve Growth Factor (NGF) Serum Concentration
Serum samples were analyzed for determining total NGF concentration. Total NGF was analyzed using a validated, sensitive, and specific immune-affinity enrichment liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometric (IA/LC/MS/MS) method.

Full Information

First Posted
May 20, 2010
Last Updated
March 3, 2021
Sponsor
Pfizer
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01127893
Brief Title
Safety Extension Study Of Tanezumab When Administered By Subcutaneous Injection To Patients With Osteoarthritis
Official Title
A PHASE 3, MULTICENTER, RANDOMIZED, LONG TERM STUDY OF THE SAFETY OF THE SUBCUTANEOUS ADMINISTRATION OF TANEZUMAB IN PATIENTS WITH OSTEOARTHRITIS OF THE KNEE
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
February 2021
Overall Recruitment Status
Terminated
Why Stopped
See termination reason in detailed description.
Study Start Date
June 15, 2010 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
September 29, 2010 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
September 29, 2010 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Pfizer

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
An evaluation of the long term safety of tanezumab when administered by subcutaneous injection every 8 weeks for up to 64 weeks
Detailed Description
This study was terminated on 29 September 2010 following a US FDA clinical hold for tanezumab osteoarthritis clinical studies which halted dosing and enrollment of patients on 23 June 2010 for potential safety issues.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Osteoarthritis
Keywords
Musculoskeletal Diseases, Joint Diseases, Arthritis, Rheumatic Diseases

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantInvestigator
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
1 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Tanezumab 10 mg
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Title
Tanezumab 5 mg
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Title
Tanezumab 2.5 mg
Arm Type
Experimental
Intervention Type
Biological
Intervention Name(s)
Tanezumab
Intervention Description
Tanezumab 10 mg administered by subcutaneous injection every 8 weeks for up to 7 injections
Intervention Type
Biological
Intervention Name(s)
Tanezumab
Intervention Description
Tanezumab 5 mg administered by subcutaneous injection every 8 weeks for up to 7 injections
Intervention Type
Biological
Intervention Name(s)
Tanezumab
Intervention Description
Tanezumab 2.5 mg administered by subcutaneous injection every 8 weeks for up to 7 injections
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Description
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a product or medical device; the event need not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment or usage. An SAE is an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent are events between first dose of study drug, up to early termination (Day 107) that were absent before treatment in this study or that worsened relative to pretreatment state.
Time Frame
Baseline up to Early Termination (Day 107)
Title
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities
Description
Laboratory examination included blood chemistry, hematology and urinalysis. Reported results were to include abnormal laboratory findings without regard to baseline abnormality.
Time Frame
Baseline up to Early Termination (Day 107)
Title
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities
Description
Following parameters were analyzed for ECG abnormality: PR interval, QRS interval, QT interval, QT interval corrected using the Bazett's formula (QTcB), QT interval corrected using Fredericia's formula (QTcF), RR interval and heart rate (HR).
Time Frame
Baseline up to Early Termination (Day 107)
Title
Number of Participants With Neurologic Examination Abnormalities
Description
Neurologic examination assessed the strength of groups of muscles of the head and neck, upper limbs and lower limbs, deep tendon reflexes and sensation (tactile, vibration, joint position sense and pin prick) of index fingers and great toes.
Time Frame
Baseline up to Early Termination (Day 107)
Title
Number of Participants With Anti-Drug (Tanezumab) Antibody (ADA)
Description
Human serum ADA samples were analyzed for the presence or absence of anti-tanezumab antibodies by using the semi-quantitative enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).
Time Frame
Baseline up to Early Termination (Day 107)
Title
Number of Participants With Injection Site Reactions
Description
Injection site reactions included: erythema (redness), induration (swelling), ecchymosis (bruising), pruritus (itching) and pain that occurred after the injection has been administered.
Time Frame
Baseline up to Early Termination (Day 107)
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, and 64
Description
The WOMAC pain subscale is a 5-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of pain experienced due to osteoarthritis in the index joint in the past 48 hours. It is calculated as the mean of the scores from the 5 individual questions scored on a numerical rating scale (NRS) of 0 to 10, where higher scores indicated higher pain. Total score range for WOMAC pain subscale score is 0 to 10, where higher scores indicated higher pain.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64
Title
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, and 64
Description
The WOMAC physical function subscale is a 17-item questionnaire used to assess the degree of difficulty experienced due to osteoarthritis in the index joint in the past 48 hours. It is calculated as the mean of the scores from the 17 individual questions scored on a NRS of 0 to 10, where higher scores indicated worse function. Total score range for WOMAC physical function subscale score is 0 to 10, where higher scores indicate worse function. Physical function refers to participant's ability to move around and perform usual activities of daily living.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64
Title
Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, and 64
Description
PGA: Participants answered the following question: "Considering all the ways your osteoarthritis (OA) in your knee affects you, how are you doing today?" Participants rated their condition by using a 5-point Likert scale: 1) Very Good (asymptomatic and no limitation of normal activities); 2) Good (mild symptoms and no limitation of normal activities); 3) Fair (moderate symptoms and limitation of some normal activities); 4) Poor (severe symptoms and inability to carry out most normal activities); and 5) Very Poor (very severe symptoms which are intolerable and inability to carry out all normal activities).
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64
Title
Percentage of Participants With Outcome Measures in Rheumatoid Arthritis Clinical Trials - Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) Response
Description
OMERACT-OARSI response: >=50 percent (%) improvement from baseline and absolute change from baseline of >=2 units at Week of interest in WOMAC pain or physical function subscale, or at least 2 of the following 3 being true: >=20% improvement from baseline and absolute change from baseline of >=1 unit at Week of interest in 1) WOMAC pain subscale, 2) WOMAC physical function subscale, 3) PGA of osteoarthritis (score: 1-5, higher score=more affected). WOMAC pain, physical function subscales assess amount of pain/difficulty experienced (score: 0-10, higher score=higher pain/difficulty).
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64
Title
Percentage of Participants With At Least 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score
Description
The WOMAC pain subscale is a 5-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of pain experienced due to osteoarthritis in the index joint in the past 48 hours. It was calculated as the mean of the scores from the 5 individual questions scored on a numerical rating scale (NRS) of 0 to 10, where higher scores indicated higher pain. Total score range for WOMAC pain subscale score was 0 to 10, where higher scores indicated higher pain.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64
Title
Number of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score
Description
The WOMAC pain subscale is a 5-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of pain experienced due to osteoarthritis in the index joint in the past 48 hours. It was calculated as the mean of the scores from the 5 individual questions scored on a numerical rating scale (NRS) of 0 to 10, where higher scores indicated higher pain. Total score range for WOMAC pain subscale score was 0 to 10, where higher scores indicated higher pain.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64
Title
Percentage of Participants With Improvement of At Least (>=) 2 Point in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis
Description
PGA: Participants answered the following question: "Considering all the ways your OA in your joint affects you, how are you doing today?" Participants rated their condition by using a 5-point Likert scale: 1) Very Good (asymptomatic and no limitation of normal activities); 2) Good (mild symptoms and no limitation of normal activities); 3) Fair (moderate symptoms and limitation of some normal activities); 4) Poor (severe symptoms and inability to carry out most normal activities); and 5) Very Poor (very severe symptoms which are intolerable and inability to carry out all normal activities).
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64
Title
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, and 64
Description
The WOMAC stiffness subscale is a 2-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of stiffness experienced in the index joint in the past 48 hours. It was calculated as the mean of the scores from the 2 individual questions scored on NRS of 0 to 10; where higher scores indicated more stiffness. Total score range for WOMAC stiffness subscale score is 0 to 10, where higher scores indicated more stiffness. Stiffness is defined as a sensation of decreased ease in movement of the index joint.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64
Title
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, and 64
Description
WOMAC: self-administered, disease-specific 24-item questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain (5 items), stiffness (2 items) and physical function (17 items) in participants with osteoarthritis. WOMAC average score was the mean of WOMAC pain, physical function and stiffness subscale scores and ranges from 0 to 10, where higher score indicated worse response.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64
Title
Change From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Item (Pain When Walking on a Flat Surface) at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, and 64
Description
Participants answered: "How much pain have you had when walking on a flat surface?" Participants responded by using a NRS of 0 to 10, where 0 = no pain and 10 = extreme pain.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64
Title
Change From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Item (Pain When Going Up or Down Stairs) at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, and 64
Description
Participants answered: "How much pain have you had when going up or down stairs?" Participants responded by using a NRS of 0 to 10, where 0 = no pain and 10 = extreme pain.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64
Title
Time to Discontinuation Due to Lack of Efficacy
Time Frame
Baseline up to Week 64
Title
Number of Participants Who Received Concomitant Analgesic Medication for Osteoarthritis Treatment
Description
Permissible concomitant analgesic medications included Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved opioids, topical analgesics, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), capsaicin products, oral/injectable corticosteroids and viscosupplementation (for example, hyaluronan) and were to be prescribed as per investigator's discretion.
Time Frame
Baseline up to Day 107 (Early Termination)
Title
Days Per Week of Concomitant Analgesic Medication Usage for Osteoarthritis Treatment
Description
Permissible concomitant analgesic medications included Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved opioids, topical analgesics, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), capsaicin products, oral/injectable corticosteroids and viscosupplementation (for example, hyaluronan) and were to be prescribed as per investigator's discretion.
Time Frame
Baseline up to Week 64
Title
Tanezumab Plasma Concentration
Time Frame
Pre-dose on Week 8, 24, 40; Week 56, 64
Title
Nerve Growth Factor (NGF) Serum Concentration
Description
Serum samples were analyzed for determining total NGF concentration. Total NGF was analyzed using a validated, sensitive, and specific immune-affinity enrichment liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometric (IA/LC/MS/MS) method.
Time Frame
Pre-dose on Week 8, 24, 40; Week 56, 64

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
99 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Must have participated in specific Phase 3 parent study Exclusion Criteria: Failed screening for parent study, pregnant women, lactating mothers
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Pfizer CT.gov Call Center
Organizational Affiliation
Pfizer
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Triwest Research Associates
City
La Mesa
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
91942
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Yes
IPD Sharing Plan Description
Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical_trials/trial_data_and_results/data_requests.
IPD Sharing URL
https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical_trials/trial_data_and_results/data_requests
Links:
URL
https://trialinfoemail.pfizer.com/pages/landing.aspx?StudyID=A4091032&StudyName=Safety%20Extension%20Study%20Of%20Tanezumab%20When%20Administered%20By%20Subcutaneous%20Injection%20To%20Patients%20With%20Osteoarthritis%20
Description
To obtain contact information for a study center near you, click here.

Learn more about this trial

Safety Extension Study Of Tanezumab When Administered By Subcutaneous Injection To Patients With Osteoarthritis

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs