search
Back to results

The CANTATA-D2 Trial (CANagliflozin Treatment And Trial Analysis - DPP-4 Inhibitor Second Comparator Trial)

Primary Purpose

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Sitagliptin 100 mg
Canagliflozin 300 mg
Metformin
Sulphonylurea
Sponsored by
Janssen Research & Development, LLC
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 focused on measuring Canagliflozin, Sitagliptin (Januvia), Metformin, Sulphonylurea, Hemoglobin A1c, Type 2 diabetes mellitus

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All patients must have a diagnosis of T2DM and be currently treated with metformin and sulphonylurea
  • Patients in the study must have a HbA1c between >=7 and <=10.5% and a fasting plasma glucose (FPG) <300 mg/dL (16.7 mmol/L)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of diabetic ketoacidosis, type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM), pancreas or beta cell transplantation, or diabetes secondary to pancreatitis or pancreatectomy
  • or a severe hypoglycemic episode within 6 months before screening

Sites / Locations

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Canagliflozin 300 mg

Sitagliptin 100 mg

Arm Description

Each patient will receive 300 mg of canagliflozin once daily for 52 weeks with protocol-specified doses of metformin and sulphonylurea

Each patient will receive 100 mg of sitagliptin once daily for 52 weeks with protocol-specified doses of metformin and sulphonylurea

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Change in HbA1c From Baseline to Week 52
The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean change in HbA1c from Baseline to Week 52 for each treatment group. The statistical analysis shows the treatment difference (ie, between canagliflozin and sitagliptin) in the LS mean change.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Percentage of Patients With HbA1c <7% at Week 52
The table below shows the percentage of patients with HbA1c <7% at Week 52 in each treatment group. The statistical analysis shows the treatment difference (ie, between canagliflozin and sitagliptin) in the percentage.
Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) From Baseline to Week 52
The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean change in FPG from Baseline to Week 52 for each treatment group. The statistical analysis shows the treatment difference (ie, between canagliflozin and sitagliptin) in the LS mean change.
Percent Change in Body Weight From Baseline to Week 52
The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean percent change in body weight from Baseline to Week 52 for each treatment group. The statistical analysis shows the treatment difference (ie, between canagliflozin and sitagliptin) in the LS mean percent change.
Change in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) From Baseline to Week 52
The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean change in SBP from Baseline to Week 52 for each treatment group. The statistical analysis shows the treatment difference (ie, between canagliflozin and sitagliptin) in the LS mean change.
Percent Change in Triglycerides From Baseline to Week 52
The table below shows the mean percent change in triglycerides from Baseline to Week 52 for each treatment group. The statistical analysis shows the treatment difference (ie, between canagliflozin and sitagliptin) in the LS mean change.
Percent Change in High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) From Baseline to Week 52
The table below shows the mean percent change in HDL-C from Baseline to Week 52 for each treatment group. The statistical analysis shows the treatment difference (ie, between canagliflozin and sitagliptin) in the LS mean change.

Full Information

First Posted
June 3, 2010
Last Updated
January 5, 2015
Sponsor
Janssen Research & Development, LLC
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01137812
Brief Title
The CANTATA-D2 Trial (CANagliflozin Treatment And Trial Analysis - DPP-4 Inhibitor Second Comparator Trial)
Official Title
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Active-Controlled, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Canagliflozin Versus Sitagliptin in the Treatment of Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus With Inadequate Glycemic Control on Metformin and Sulphonylurea Therapy
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
January 2015
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
July 2010 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
March 2012 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
March 2012 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Janssen Research & Development, LLC

4. Oversight

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of canagliflozin compared with sitagliptin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who are receiving treatment with metformin and sulphonylurea and have inadequate glycemic (blood sugar) control.
Detailed Description
Canagliflozin is a drug that is being tested to see if it may be useful in treating patients diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). This is a randomized (study drug assigned by chance), double-blind (neither the patient or the study doctor will know the name of the assigned treatment), multicenter study to determine the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of canagliflozin 300 mg compared to sitagliptin 100 mg (an antihyperglycemic drug) in patients with T2DM who are not achieving an adequate response from current antihyperglycemic therapy with metformin and sulphonylurea to control their diabetes. Approximately 720 patients with T2DM who are receiving combination therapy with metformin and sulphonylurea will receive the addition of once-daily treatment with canagliflozin 300 mg or sitagliptin 100 mg capsules for 52 weeks. Patients will participate in the study for approximately 59 to 72 weeks. During treatment, patients will be monitored for safety by review of adverse events, results from laboratory tests, 12-lead electrocardiograms (ECGs), vital signs measurements, body weight, physical examinations, and self monitored blood glucose (SMBG) measurements. The primary outcome measure in the study is the effect of canagliflozin compared to sitagliptin on hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) after 52 weeks of treatment. Study drug will be taken orally (by mouth) once daily before the first meal each day unless otherwise specified. Patients will take single-blind placebo for 2 weeks before randomization. After randomization, patients in the study will take double-blind canagliflozin 300 mg or matching sitagliptin 100 mg for 52 weeks.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
Keywords
Canagliflozin, Sitagliptin (Januvia), Metformin, Sulphonylurea, Hemoglobin A1c, Type 2 diabetes mellitus

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderInvestigator
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
756 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Canagliflozin 300 mg
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Each patient will receive 300 mg of canagliflozin once daily for 52 weeks with protocol-specified doses of metformin and sulphonylurea
Arm Title
Sitagliptin 100 mg
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Each patient will receive 100 mg of sitagliptin once daily for 52 weeks with protocol-specified doses of metformin and sulphonylurea
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Sitagliptin 100 mg
Intervention Description
One 100 mg capsule once daily for 52 weeks with protocol-specified doses of metformin and sulphonylurea
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Canagliflozin 300 mg
Intervention Description
One 300 mg capsule once daily for 52 weeks with protocol-specified doses of metformin and sulphonylurea
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Metformin
Intervention Description
Patients will continue to take background therapy with Metformin for T2DM at maximally or near-maximally effective protocol-specified doses for the duration of the study.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Sulphonylurea
Intervention Description
Patients will continue to take background therapy with Sulphonylurea for T2DM at maximally or near-maximally effective protocol-specified doses for the duration of the study.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in HbA1c From Baseline to Week 52
Description
The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean change in HbA1c from Baseline to Week 52 for each treatment group. The statistical analysis shows the treatment difference (ie, between canagliflozin and sitagliptin) in the LS mean change.
Time Frame
Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 52
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Percentage of Patients With HbA1c <7% at Week 52
Description
The table below shows the percentage of patients with HbA1c <7% at Week 52 in each treatment group. The statistical analysis shows the treatment difference (ie, between canagliflozin and sitagliptin) in the percentage.
Time Frame
Week 52
Title
Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) From Baseline to Week 52
Description
The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean change in FPG from Baseline to Week 52 for each treatment group. The statistical analysis shows the treatment difference (ie, between canagliflozin and sitagliptin) in the LS mean change.
Time Frame
Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 52
Title
Percent Change in Body Weight From Baseline to Week 52
Description
The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean percent change in body weight from Baseline to Week 52 for each treatment group. The statistical analysis shows the treatment difference (ie, between canagliflozin and sitagliptin) in the LS mean percent change.
Time Frame
Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 52
Title
Change in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) From Baseline to Week 52
Description
The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean change in SBP from Baseline to Week 52 for each treatment group. The statistical analysis shows the treatment difference (ie, between canagliflozin and sitagliptin) in the LS mean change.
Time Frame
Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 52
Title
Percent Change in Triglycerides From Baseline to Week 52
Description
The table below shows the mean percent change in triglycerides from Baseline to Week 52 for each treatment group. The statistical analysis shows the treatment difference (ie, between canagliflozin and sitagliptin) in the LS mean change.
Time Frame
Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 52
Title
Percent Change in High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) From Baseline to Week 52
Description
The table below shows the mean percent change in HDL-C from Baseline to Week 52 for each treatment group. The statistical analysis shows the treatment difference (ie, between canagliflozin and sitagliptin) in the LS mean change.
Time Frame
Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 52

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: All patients must have a diagnosis of T2DM and be currently treated with metformin and sulphonylurea Patients in the study must have a HbA1c between >=7 and <=10.5% and a fasting plasma glucose (FPG) <300 mg/dL (16.7 mmol/L) Exclusion Criteria: History of diabetic ketoacidosis, type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM), pancreas or beta cell transplantation, or diabetes secondary to pancreatitis or pancreatectomy or a severe hypoglycemic episode within 6 months before screening
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Janssen Research & Development, LLC C. Clinical Trial
Organizational Affiliation
Janssen Research & Development, LLC
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
City
Mobile
State/Province
Alabama
Country
United States
City
Goodyear
State/Province
Arizona
Country
United States
City
Mesa
State/Province
Arizona
Country
United States
City
Escondido
State/Province
California
Country
United States
City
Fresno
State/Province
California
Country
United States
City
Greenbrae
State/Province
California
Country
United States
City
La Mesa
State/Province
California
Country
United States
City
Laguna Hills
State/Province
California
Country
United States
City
Lancaster
State/Province
California
Country
United States
City
Long Beach
State/Province
California
Country
United States
City
Los Angeles
State/Province
California
Country
United States
City
Norwalk
State/Province
California
Country
United States
City
Pismo Beach
State/Province
California
Country
United States
City
Roseville
State/Province
California
Country
United States
City
Spring Valley
State/Province
California
Country
United States
City
Walnut Creek
State/Province
California
Country
United States
City
Watsonville
State/Province
California
Country
United States
City
Denver
State/Province
Colorado
Country
United States
City
Northglenn
State/Province
Colorado
Country
United States
City
Milford
State/Province
Connecticut
Country
United States
City
Bradenton
State/Province
Florida
Country
United States
City
Cape Coral
State/Province
Florida
Country
United States
City
Clearwater
State/Province
Florida
Country
United States
City
Delray Beach
State/Province
Florida
Country
United States
City
Miami
State/Province
Florida
Country
United States
City
Pembroke Pines
State/Province
Florida
Country
United States
City
Tampa
State/Province
Florida
Country
United States
City
Atlanta
State/Province
Georgia
Country
United States
City
Lewiston
State/Province
Idaho
Country
United States
City
Chicago
State/Province
Illinois
Country
United States
City
O'Fallon
State/Province
Illinois
Country
United States
City
Springfield
State/Province
Illinois
Country
United States
City
Topeka
State/Province
Kansas
Country
United States
City
Bowling Green
State/Province
Kentucky
Country
United States
City
Lexington
State/Province
Kentucky
Country
United States
City
Madisonville
State/Province
Kentucky
Country
United States
City
Baton Rouge
State/Province
Louisiana
Country
United States
City
Mandeville
State/Province
Louisiana
Country
United States
City
Metairie
State/Province
Louisiana
Country
United States
City
Sunset
State/Province
Louisiana
Country
United States
City
Brockton
State/Province
Massachusetts
Country
United States
City
Saint Clair Shores
State/Province
Michigan
Country
United States
City
Southfield
State/Province
Michigan
Country
United States
City
Dakota Dunes
State/Province
Nebraska
Country
United States
City
Toms River
State/Province
New Jersey
Country
United States
City
Albuquerque
State/Province
New Mexico
Country
United States
City
West Seneca
State/Province
New York
Country
United States
City
Calabash
State/Province
North Carolina
Country
United States
City
Greensboro
State/Province
North Carolina
Country
United States
City
Moerhead City
State/Province
North Carolina
Country
United States
City
Morganton
State/Province
North Carolina
Country
United States
City
Cincinnati
State/Province
Ohio
Country
United States
City
Gallipolis
State/Province
Ohio
Country
United States
City
Marion
State/Province
Ohio
Country
United States
City
Mason
State/Province
Ohio
Country
United States
City
Toledo
State/Province
Ohio
Country
United States
City
Zanesville
State/Province
Ohio
Country
United States
City
Beaver
State/Province
Pennsylvania
Country
United States
City
Bensalem
State/Province
Pennsylvania
Country
United States
City
Norristown
State/Province
Pennsylvania
Country
United States
City
Perryopolis
State/Province
Pennsylvania
Country
United States
City
Philadelphia
State/Province
Pennsylvania
Country
United States
City
Pittsburgh
State/Province
Pennsylvania
Country
United States
City
Pottstown
State/Province
Pennsylvania
Country
United States
City
Greenville
State/Province
South Carolina
Country
United States
City
Spartanburg
State/Province
South Carolina
Country
United States
City
Johnson City
State/Province
Tennessee
Country
United States
City
Dallas
State/Province
Texas
Country
United States
City
Fort Worth
State/Province
Texas
Country
United States
City
Houston
State/Province
Texas
Country
United States
City
Killeen
State/Province
Texas
Country
United States
City
Richardson
State/Province
Texas
Country
United States
City
San Antonio
State/Province
Texas
Country
United States
City
Schertz
State/Province
Texas
Country
United States
City
Sugar Land
State/Province
Texas
Country
United States
City
Burke
State/Province
Virginia
Country
United States
City
Danville
State/Province
Virginia
Country
United States
City
Falls Church
State/Province
Virginia
Country
United States
City
Hampton
State/Province
Virginia
Country
United States
City
Henrico
State/Province
Virginia
Country
United States
City
Manassas
State/Province
Virginia
Country
United States
City
Norfolk
State/Province
Virginia
Country
United States
City
Richmond
State/Province
Virginia
Country
United States
City
Selah
State/Province
Washington
Country
United States
City
Tacoma
State/Province
Washington
Country
United States
City
Salzburg
Country
Austria
City
Wien
Country
Austria
City
Hedersem (Aalst)
Country
Belgium
City
Tremelo
Country
Belgium
City
Belem
Country
Brazil
City
Brasilia
Country
Brazil
City
Fortaleza
Country
Brazil
City
Goiânia
Country
Brazil
City
Marília
Country
Brazil
City
Passo Fundo
Country
Brazil
City
Porto Alegre
Country
Brazil
City
Rio De Janeiro
Country
Brazil
City
Sao Paulo
Country
Brazil
City
Calgary
State/Province
Alberta
Country
Canada
City
Red Deer
State/Province
Alberta
Country
Canada
City
Vancouver
State/Province
British Columbia
Country
Canada
City
Halifax
State/Province
Nova Scotia
Country
Canada
City
Brampton
State/Province
Ontario
Country
Canada
City
Oshawa
State/Province
Ontario
Country
Canada
City
Toronto
State/Province
Ontario
Country
Canada
City
Charlottetown
State/Province
Prince Edward Island
Country
Canada
City
Sherbrooke
State/Province
Quebec
Country
Canada
City
Ville, Laint-Laurent
State/Province
Quebec
Country
Canada
City
Pointe-Claire
Country
Canada
City
Toronto
Country
Canada
City
Aalborg
Country
Denmark
City
Ballerup
Country
Denmark
City
Gentofte
Country
Denmark
City
Vejle
Country
Denmark
City
Vipperoed
Country
Denmark
City
Bondy Cedex
Country
France
City
Dijon
Country
France
City
Marseille
Country
France
City
Nantes
Country
France
City
Narbonne Cedex
Country
France
City
Paris
Country
France
City
Pessac
Country
France
City
St Etienne
Country
France
City
Berlin
Country
Germany
City
Dresden
Country
Germany
City
Eisenach
Country
Germany
City
Großheirath
Country
Germany
City
Meißen
Country
Germany
City
Bangalore
Country
India
City
Coimbatore
Country
India
City
Hyderabad
Country
India
City
Jaipur
Country
India
City
Nagpur
Country
India
City
Nashik
Country
India
City
Pune
Country
India
City
Beer Sheba
Country
Israel
City
Jerusalem
Country
Israel
City
Kfar Saba
Country
Israel
City
Nazareth
Country
Israel
City
Rishon Lezion
Country
Israel
City
Tel-Aviv
Country
Israel
City
Busan
Country
Korea, Republic of
City
Daegu
Country
Korea, Republic of
City
Jeonju-Si
Country
Korea, Republic of
City
Seongnam
Country
Korea, Republic of
City
Seoul
Country
Korea, Republic of
City
Ipoh
Country
Malaysia
City
Johor Bahru
Country
Malaysia
City
Kelantan
Country
Malaysia
City
Selangor
Country
Malaysia
City
Breda
Country
Netherlands
City
Eindhoven
Country
Netherlands
City
Groningen
Country
Netherlands
City
Leiderdorp
Country
Netherlands
City
Rotterdam
Country
Netherlands
City
Velp Gld
Country
Netherlands
City
Zoetermeer
Country
Netherlands
City
Christchurch
Country
New Zealand
City
Dunedin
Country
New Zealand
City
Rotorua
Country
New Zealand
City
Tauranga
Country
New Zealand
City
Wellington
Country
New Zealand
City
Bialystok
Country
Poland
City
Chrzanow
Country
Poland
City
Gdansk
Country
Poland
City
Kamieniec Zabkowicki
Country
Poland
City
Krakow
Country
Poland
City
Lublin
Country
Poland
City
Sobotka
Country
Poland
City
Sopot
Country
Poland
City
Torun
Country
Poland
City
Wroclaw
Country
Poland
City
Zabrze
Country
Poland
City
Singapore
Country
Singapore
City
Dnepropetrovsk
Country
Ukraine
City
Ivano Frankivsk
Country
Ukraine
City
Kharkov
Country
Ukraine
City
Kiev
Country
Ukraine
City
Odessa
Country
Ukraine
City
Poltava
Country
Ukraine
City
Sumy
Country
Ukraine
City
Ternopil
Country
Ukraine
City
Vinnitsa
Country
Ukraine
City
Zaporozhye
Country
Ukraine

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
29313267
Citation
Cai J, Delahanty LM, Akapame S, Slee A, Traina S. Impact of Canagliflozin Treatment on Health-Related Quality of Life among People with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Pooled Analysis of Patient-Reported Outcomes from Randomized Controlled Trials. Patient. 2018 Jun;11(3):341-352. doi: 10.1007/s40271-017-0290-4.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
27977934
Citation
Qiu R, Balis D, Xie J, Davies MJ, Desai M, Meininger G. Longer-term safety and tolerability of canagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes: a pooled analysis. Curr Med Res Opin. 2017 Mar;33(3):553-562. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2016.1271780. Epub 2017 Jan 4.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
27391951
Citation
Schernthaner G, Lavalle-Gonzalez FJ, Davidson JA, Jodon H, Vijapurkar U, Qiu R, Canovatchel W. Canagliflozin provides greater attainment of both HbA1c and body weight reduction versus sitagliptin in patients with type 2 diabetes. Postgrad Med. 2016 Nov;128(8):725-730. doi: 10.1080/00325481.2016.1210988. Epub 2016 Jul 26.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
26580237
Citation
Watts NB, Bilezikian JP, Usiskin K, Edwards R, Desai M, Law G, Meininger G. Effects of Canagliflozin on Fracture Risk in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2016 Jan;101(1):157-66. doi: 10.1210/jc.2015-3167. Epub 2015 Nov 18.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
26579834
Citation
Lavalle-Gonzalez FJ, Eliaschewitz FG, Cerdas S, Chacon Mdel P, Tong C, Alba M. Efficacy and safety of canagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus from Latin America. Curr Med Res Opin. 2016;32(3):427-39. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2015.1121865. Epub 2016 Jan 14.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
25795432
Citation
Bailey RA, Vijapurkar U, Meininger G, Rupnow MF, Blonde L. Diabetes-Related Composite Quality End Point Attainment: Canagliflozin Versus Sitagliptin Based on a Pooled Analysis of 2 Clinical Trials. Clin Ther. 2015 May 1;37(5):1045-54. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2015.02.020. Epub 2015 Mar 18.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
24585202
Citation
Polidori D, Mari A, Ferrannini E. Canagliflozin, a sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor, improves model-based indices of beta cell function in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetologia. 2014 May;57(5):891-901. doi: 10.1007/s00125-014-3196-x. Epub 2014 Mar 1.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
23564919
Citation
Schernthaner G, Gross JL, Rosenstock J, Guarisco M, Fu M, Yee J, Kawaguchi M, Canovatchel W, Meininger G. Canagliflozin compared with sitagliptin for patients with type 2 diabetes who do not have adequate glycemic control with metformin plus sulfonylurea: a 52-week randomized trial. Diabetes Care. 2013 Sep;36(9):2508-15. doi: 10.2337/dc12-2491. Epub 2013 Apr 5. Erratum In: Diabetes Care. 2013 Dec;36(12):4172.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

The CANTATA-D2 Trial (CANagliflozin Treatment And Trial Analysis - DPP-4 Inhibitor Second Comparator Trial)

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs