search
Back to results

Improving Hand and Arm Function After Spinal Cord Injury (SCI)

Primary Purpose

Spinal Cord Injury

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Arm and hand training
Sponsored by
University of Miami
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Spinal Cord Injury focused on measuring task-specific training, arm and hand function, corticomotor plasticity, individuals with motor-incomplete spinal cord injury

Eligibility Criteria

16 Years - 70 Years (Child, Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • traumatic spinal cord injury of at least one-year duration
  • injury to cervical spinal cord at C7 or higher
  • sufficient strength of thenar muscles to generate, at minimum, a visible twitch contraction in at least one thumb

Exclusion Criteria:

  • history of head trauma and/or cognitive deficit
  • subject history of stroke, seizures or other intracranial disease
  • family history of seizures
  • inability to provide informed consent

Sites / Locations

  • The Miami Project to Cure Paralysis

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Somatosensory stimulation (SS)

Massed practice + somatosensory stimulation (MP+SS)

Conventional resistance training (CRT)

Arm Description

Participants in the SS group receive median nerve electrical stimulation applied to the skin of the wrists.

Participants in the MP+SS group receive a combined intervention consisting of SS and a skill-based exercise protocol

Participants in the CRT group will participate in a weight-based exercise program

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

The Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function Test
The Jebsen Test is an assessment of hand function and improvement in hand function associated with therapeutic procedures. Individuals with cervical SCI are included in the target population for use of the test. The test is comprised of 7 subtests, including writing, turning over cards, picking up small common objects, simulated feeding, stacking checkers, picking up large light objects, and picking up large heavy objects.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Cortical motor excitability via transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)
The motor threshold (intensity required to evoke 5/10 motor evoked potentials), a recruitment curve (from 80% of the motor threshold to the maximum stimulator output, in increments of 20%), and the thenar motor map (number of active sites for the thenar muscles in the hand motor cortical distribution) will be recorded via TMS.

Full Information

First Posted
June 11, 2010
Last Updated
October 9, 2013
Sponsor
University of Miami
Collaborators
National Institutes of Health (NIH)
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01143597
Brief Title
Improving Hand and Arm Function After Spinal Cord Injury (SCI)
Official Title
Improving Hand and Arm Function After SCI
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
October 2013
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
August 2007 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
August 2013 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
August 2013 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
University of Miami
Collaborators
National Institutes of Health (NIH)

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The long-term goal of this project is to develop rehabilitation strategies that facilitate optimal restoration of skilled hand use in individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI). The objective of the studies proposed in this application is to determine whether a protocol of massed practice + somatosensory stimulation (MP+SS) is more effective for improving skilled hand use compared to a somatosensory stimulation (SS) alone, and to determine whether these approaches are each more effective than traditional therapy (consisting of conventional resistance training; CRT). Specific Aim I: In individuals with chronic incomplete tetraplegia, quantify changes in skilled hand use and sensory function associated with either: massed practice training combined with somatosensory stimulation (MP+SS), somatosensory stimulation (SS), or control (conventional resistance training [CRT]), and compare differences among groups. The investigators hypothesize that: H1.1: At the end of 4 weeks, gains in scores on standardized tests of skilled hand motor function (Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function Test and Chedoke-McMaster Arm and Hand Activity Inventory) and sensory function (quantitative sensory tests; QST) will be greater in individuals who are trained using MP+SS compared to the SS and RT groups. H1.2: At the end of 4 weeks, gains in scores on standardized tests of skilled hand motor function and sensory function tests will be greater in individuals who are trained using SS compared to CRT. H1.3: At 6 months post training, motor and sensory gains will be retained by the MP+SS and SS groups. Specific Aim 2: In individuals with chronic incomplete tetraplegia, quantify changes in cortical and spinal neurophysiology associated with either: massed practice combined with somatosensory stimulation (MP+SS), somatosensory stimulation (SS), or control (conventional resistance training [CRT]), and compare differences among groups. The investigators hypothesize that, after 4 weeks: H2.1: Measures representing cortical neurophysiologic function (i.e., motor-evoked potential amplitude and location of cortical map) will show greater change in the direction of more normal values in individuals who are trained using MP+SS compared to the SS and the CRT groups. H2.2: Measures representing spinal neurophysiologic function (i.e., F-wave and H-reflex amplitude) will show greater change in the direction of more normal values in individuals who are trained using SS compared to the MP+SS and the CRT groups. H2.3: There will be a positive relationship between change scores associated with functional outcome measures and cortical neurophysiologic outcome measures in the MP+SS group; there will be a positive relationship between change scores associated with the functional outcome measures and spinal neurophysiologic outcome measures in the SS group. Specific Aim 3: In individuals with chronic incomplete tetraplegia, quantify changes in self-assessment of quality of life and societal participation associated with massed practice combined with somatosensory stimulation (MP+SS), somatosensory stimulation (SS) or control (conventional resistance training [CRT]), and compare difference among groups. The investigators hypothesize that: H3.1: Gains in scores on standardized measures of quality of life (Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36 [SF-36]) and societal participation (Impact on Participation and Autonomy Questionnaire [IPAQ]) will be greater in individuals who are trained using MP+SS compared to both the SS and the CRT groups. H3.2: Gains in scores on standardized measures of quality of life and societal participation will be greater in individuals who are trained using SS compared to the CRT group. H3.3: At 6 months post training, gains in the quality of life and the societal participation measures will be retained by the MP+SS and SS groups. Risks: This is a low risk study that investigates the effects of standard rehabilitation and exercise interventions on hand/arm function in individuals with SCI. All devices are considered minimal risk devices by the FDA.
Detailed Description
Evidence suggests that both intensive, skill-based practice training combined with somatosensory stimulation (MP+SS) and somatosensory stimulation alone (SS) may be associated with functional changes that are greater than those associated with skill-based training alone (MP). These studies are significant in that they advance the field of rehabilitation science as it relates to the goal of improving skilled hand use in individuals with SCI; there are few goals that have more important implications for function, independence and quality of life in these individuals.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Spinal Cord Injury
Keywords
task-specific training, arm and hand function, corticomotor plasticity, individuals with motor-incomplete spinal cord injury

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Outcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
48 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Somatosensory stimulation (SS)
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Participants in the SS group receive median nerve electrical stimulation applied to the skin of the wrists.
Arm Title
Massed practice + somatosensory stimulation (MP+SS)
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Participants in the MP+SS group receive a combined intervention consisting of SS and a skill-based exercise protocol
Arm Title
Conventional resistance training (CRT)
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Participants in the CRT group will participate in a weight-based exercise program
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Arm and hand training
Intervention Description
Individuals will receive either: somatosensory stimulation isolated or combined with a skill-based exercise protocol, or a conventional strengthening program.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
The Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function Test
Description
The Jebsen Test is an assessment of hand function and improvement in hand function associated with therapeutic procedures. Individuals with cervical SCI are included in the target population for use of the test. The test is comprised of 7 subtests, including writing, turning over cards, picking up small common objects, simulated feeding, stacking checkers, picking up large light objects, and picking up large heavy objects.
Time Frame
4 weeks
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Cortical motor excitability via transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)
Description
The motor threshold (intensity required to evoke 5/10 motor evoked potentials), a recruitment curve (from 80% of the motor threshold to the maximum stimulator output, in increments of 20%), and the thenar motor map (number of active sites for the thenar muscles in the hand motor cortical distribution) will be recorded via TMS.
Time Frame
4 weeks

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
16 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
70 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: traumatic spinal cord injury of at least one-year duration injury to cervical spinal cord at C7 or higher sufficient strength of thenar muscles to generate, at minimum, a visible twitch contraction in at least one thumb Exclusion Criteria: history of head trauma and/or cognitive deficit subject history of stroke, seizures or other intracranial disease family history of seizures inability to provide informed consent
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Edelle C Field-Fote, PT, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
University of Miami
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
The Miami Project to Cure Paralysis
City
Miami
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33131
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
18373988
Citation
Beekhuizen KS, Field-Fote EC. Sensory stimulation augments the effects of massed practice training in persons with tetraplegia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008 Apr;89(4):602-8. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.11.021.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17213410
Citation
Hoffman LR, Field-Fote EC. Cortical reorganization following bimanual training and somatosensory stimulation in cervical spinal cord injury: a case report. Phys Ther. 2007 Feb;87(2):208-23. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20050365. Epub 2007 Jan 9.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15673842
Citation
Beekhuizen KS, Field-Fote EC. Massed practice versus massed practice with stimulation: effects on upper extremity function and cortical plasticity in individuals with incomplete cervical spinal cord injury. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2005 Mar;19(1):33-45. doi: 10.1177/1545968305274517.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

Improving Hand and Arm Function After Spinal Cord Injury (SCI)

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs