Study on the Effect of Cervical Mobilization on Motor Function and Pressure Pain Threshold in Pain Free Individuals
Primary Purpose
Neck Pain
Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Passive cervical mobilisation
Manual contact
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional basic science trial for Neck Pain focused on measuring physical therapy, pain threshold, electromyography, musculoskeletal manipulation, neck muscles
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- No history of neck or back pain over the last six months
- Without any previous experience with spinal manual therapy techniques
Exclusion Criteria:
- History of musculoskeletal or rheumatologic conditions
- Any kind of spinal surgery
- Dizziness
- Previous trauma to the cervical spine
- Neurological signs or symptoms
Sites / Locations
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm 3
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Placebo Comparator
No Intervention
Arm Label
Passive cervical mobilisation
Manual contact
Non-contact control
Arm Description
Grade III cervical mobilization technique as described by Maitland. Applied to left C5/6 Segment.
Manual contact control, which involved light manual contact on the left C5/C6 segment as if to perform the treatment technique.
Non-contact control, which involved the subject resting in the treatment position without any physical contact between the researcher and the subject.
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Electromyography of sternocleidomastoid muscle.
Measurement of sternocleidomastoid muscle activation during deep neck flexion. The degree of neck flexion is determined by a pressure biofeedback unit place underneath the neck. EMG of the left and right sternocleidomastoids are recorded for 5seconds at each level of neck flexion
Secondary Outcome Measures
Pressure pain threshold
The algometer to measure pressure pain threshold was applied at a constant rate of 40 kPa/sec on the posterior aspect of the left and right articular pillar of C5/C6.
Full Information
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01161758
Brief Title
Study on the Effect of Cervical Mobilization on Motor Function and Pressure Pain Threshold in Pain Free Individuals
Official Title
A Crossover Study on the Effect of Cervical Mobilization on Motor Function and Pressure Pain Threshold in Pain Free Individuals
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
November 2005
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
April 2005 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
October 2005 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
December 2005 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Name of the Sponsor
Curtin University
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
Passive accessory cervical mobilization is widely used as a clinical approach to the management of musculoskeletal pain of spinal origin. The purpose of the study is to determine if passive cervical mobilization can improve motor function in situations where motor performance is not impaired by the presence of pain.
Detailed Description
Cervical mobilization has been shown to elicit effects on pain perception, autonomic function and motor function in subjects who experience musculoskeletal pain. The improvement in motor function may be a direct effect of the treatment or secondary to a hypoalgesic effect. This study aims to demonstrate whether it is possible to alter motor function following joint mobilization, in situations where motor performance is not impaired by pain.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Neck Pain
Keywords
physical therapy, pain threshold, electromyography, musculoskeletal manipulation, neck muscles
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Basic Science
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Crossover Assignment
Masking
ParticipantInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
24 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Passive cervical mobilisation
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Grade III cervical mobilization technique as described by Maitland. Applied to left C5/6 Segment.
Arm Title
Manual contact
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
Manual contact control, which involved light manual contact on the left C5/C6 segment as if to perform the treatment technique.
Arm Title
Non-contact control
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
Non-contact control, which involved the subject resting in the treatment position without any physical contact between the researcher and the subject.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Passive cervical mobilisation
Other Intervention Name(s)
Physiotherapy
Intervention Description
Passive cervical mobilization which involved an oscillatory grade III unilateral postero-anterior mobilization applied to the left C5/C6 segment. The mobilization consisted of 3 periods of 1 minute applications with a resting period of 1 minute in between.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Manual contact
Other Intervention Name(s)
placebo light touch
Intervention Description
Manual contact control, which involved light manual contact on the left C5/C6 segment as if to perform the treatment technique. The light manual contact consisted of 3 periods of 1 minute applications with a resting period of 1 minute in between.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Electromyography of sternocleidomastoid muscle.
Description
Measurement of sternocleidomastoid muscle activation during deep neck flexion. The degree of neck flexion is determined by a pressure biofeedback unit place underneath the neck. EMG of the left and right sternocleidomastoids are recorded for 5seconds at each level of neck flexion
Time Frame
Pre intervention (baseline) and 1 minute post intervention
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Pressure pain threshold
Description
The algometer to measure pressure pain threshold was applied at a constant rate of 40 kPa/sec on the posterior aspect of the left and right articular pillar of C5/C6.
Time Frame
Pre intervention (baseline) and 1 minute post intervention
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
55 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
No history of neck or back pain over the last six months
Without any previous experience with spinal manual therapy techniques
Exclusion Criteria:
History of musculoskeletal or rheumatologic conditions
Any kind of spinal surgery
Dizziness
Previous trauma to the cervical spine
Neurological signs or symptoms
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Benjamin Soon Tze Chin, MManipTher
Organizational Affiliation
The University of Queensland
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Annina Schmid, MManipTher
Organizational Affiliation
The University of Queensland
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Elias Fridriksson, MManipTher
Organizational Affiliation
Curtin University
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Philip Cheong, MManipTher
Organizational Affiliation
Curtin University
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Elisabeth Gresslos, MManipTher
Organizational Affiliation
Curitn University of Technology
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Anthony Wright, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Curtin University
Official's Role
Study Chair
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Learn more about this trial
Study on the Effect of Cervical Mobilization on Motor Function and Pressure Pain Threshold in Pain Free Individuals
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs