search
Back to results

Effect of Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) in Painful Diabetic Polyneuropathy (PDP)

Primary Purpose

Diabetic Neuropathies, Pain, Electric Stimulation Therapy

Status
Unknown status
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Netherlands
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Spinal Cord Stimulation
Sponsored by
Maastricht University Medical Center
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Diabetic Neuropathies focused on measuring Electric stimulation therapy, Diabetic Neuropathies

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 75 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Moderate-to-severe PDP in the lower limbs

    • The pain intended to treat has been present for more than 12 months
    • Previous treatment has been unsuccessful (insufficient pain relief and/or unacceptable side-effects) with drugs from the following drug categories:
    • Amitriptylin or an other tricyclic antidepressant and/or
    • Pregabalin (Lyrica®) or Gabapentin (Neurontin®) and/or
    • Duloxetine (Cymbalta®) and/or
    • Tramadol or strong opioids Patients were treated with 3 drugs from the above mentioned drug categories and followed the treatment algorithm for painful diabetic polyneuropathy according to Jensen. Starting dosage was based on individual patient characteristics. Each drug was tried for at least 3 weeks and dose was raised once, if possible. By insufficient pain relief and/or unacceptable side-effects, the drug treatment was stopped. Patients reached a steady state in medication use and it is not allowed to increase dosage during the study.
  • Mean pain intensity during daytime and/or night time should be 5 or higher measured on a numeric rating scale (NRS). Pain during daytime will be scored 3 times per day during for 4 days according to Jensen.
  • Patient's age is between 18 and 75 years.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • The patient has had neuromodulation therapy during the month before the intake
  • Neuropathic pain is most prevalent in the upper limbs (NRS>3)
  • Neuropathy or chronic pain of other origin than diabetes mellitus (NRS> 3)
  • Addiction: drugs, alcohol (> 5E / day) and/or medication

    • Drugs: cocaine, heroine, marihuana.
    • Alcohol: wine, beer, liquor (max 5E / day)
    • Medication: benzodiazepines.
  • Insufficient cooperation from the patient (little motivation, understanding or communication)
  • Blood clotting disorder, when using 2 or more different kinds of anti coagulation
  • Immune deficiency (HIV-positive, corticosteroids with a dose equivalent to > prednisolone 10 mg, immunodepressive, etc.)
  • Peripheral vascular disease without palpable peripheral pulses at both feet (inclusion is possible if pulses are absent, but ankle brachial index is between 0.7 and 1.2 in both feet)
  • Active foot ulceration
  • Life expectancy < 1 year
  • Pacemaker
  • Local infection or other skin disorders at site of incision
  • Psychiatric problems potentially interfering with cooperation in the study
  • Pregnancy
  • Severe cardiac or pulmonary failure (> NYHA classification II)
  • Unstable blood glucose control (change in HbA1c>1,0% in three months prior to inclusion)

Sites / Locations

  • UMC St. Radboud
  • Maastricht University Medical Center

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

No Intervention

Arm Label

Spinal Cord Stimulation

Treatment as usual

Arm Description

Spinal cord stimulation

Treatment as usual

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Pain intensity measured on a weighted NRS according to Jensen and a PGIC for pain measured on a 7-point Likert scale.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Effect SCS on health related quality of life, quality of sleep, mood, blood glucose control, large/small nerve fibre functions, predictive factors success of SCS treatment, small fibre loss/regeneration, cost-utility and cost-effectiveness

Full Information

First Posted
July 7, 2010
Last Updated
July 3, 2017
Sponsor
Maastricht University Medical Center
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01162993
Brief Title
Effect of Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) in Painful Diabetic Polyneuropathy
Acronym
PDP
Official Title
Effect of Spinal Cord Stimulation in Painful Diabetic Polyneuropathy: a Multicenter Randomised Controlled Trial (PDP Study)
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
October 2016
Overall Recruitment Status
Unknown status
Study Start Date
April 2010 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
January 2013 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
January 2018 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Maastricht University Medical Center

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Rationale: Diabetic neuropathy is one of the most common complications of Diabetes Mellitus (DM). Pain is a common symptom of diabetic neuropathy, affecting 11-34% of patients suffering form DM. The burden of disease of painful diabetic polyneuropathy (PDP) is high for both the patient and society, due to significant pain levels, frequent co-morbidity, polypharmacy and significant health resource use. Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has been used for over 30 years to treat neuropathic pain. Several small clinical studies have shown a beneficial effect of SCS on pain in PDP. Objective: The primary objective of this study is to investigate whether SCS leads to clinically relevant (≥50%) pain relief in patients with moderate-to-severe PDP in the lower limbs after 6 months of treatment. Secondary objectives to investigate 1) the effect of SCS on health related quality of life in PDP; 2) the effect of SCS on the quality of sleep in PDP; 3) the effect of SCS on mood in PDP; 4) the effect of SCS on blood glucose control in PDP; 5) the effect of SCS on large and small nerve fibre functions in PDP; 6) identifying predictive factors for success of SCS treatment of PDP; after 6 months 7) the effect of SCS on small fibre loss and regeneration in PDP; and 8) costs, cost-utility and cost-effectiveness after 12 months of treatment. Study design: the study is a multi centre randomized controlled trial. Study population: Patients suffering from moderate-to-severe PDP in the lower limbs due to diabetes mellitus type 1 or type 2 as diagnosed by clinical symptoms (glove and stocking distribution). Intervention: patients assigned to group 1 will receive spinal cord stimulation (SCS) and/or best (drug) treatment as possible, patients assigned to group 2 will receive best (drug) treatment as possible. Main study parameters/endpoints: The main study parameter will be the mean pain intensity and/or maximal pain intensity during daytime and/or during night time as measured on a weighted NRS and/or a PGIC for pain and sleep measured on a 7-point Likert scale, after 6 months of treatment. Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: SCS related risks include: lead migration (14%), lead breakage (7%), implanted pulse generator migration (1%), loss of therapeutic effect, lost or unpleasant paresthesias (12%), infection or wound breakdown (10%), Pain at IPG incision site (12%), IPG pocket fluid collection (5%). Treatment-as-usual related risks are related to the medication used and do not increase due to participation in this study.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Diabetic Neuropathies, Pain, Electric Stimulation Therapy
Keywords
Electric stimulation therapy, Diabetic Neuropathies

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
40 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Spinal Cord Stimulation
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Spinal cord stimulation
Arm Title
Treatment as usual
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
Treatment as usual
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Spinal Cord Stimulation
Other Intervention Name(s)
Medtronic leads and neurostimulator (CE mark 0123)
Intervention Description
The intervention is spinal cord stimulation and will be used for 2 weeks trial stimulation. After clinical successful pain relief (≥50% relief of pain intensity on a weighted numeric rating scale (NRS) or a score of ≥6 on a seven-point Likert scale (1=very much worse; 7=very much improved) of the PGIC scale for pain and sleep) a definite spinal cord system will be implanted.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Pain intensity measured on a weighted NRS according to Jensen and a PGIC for pain measured on a 7-point Likert scale.
Time Frame
6 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Effect SCS on health related quality of life, quality of sleep, mood, blood glucose control, large/small nerve fibre functions, predictive factors success of SCS treatment, small fibre loss/regeneration, cost-utility and cost-effectiveness
Time Frame
6 and 12 months and 5 year follow-up

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
75 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Moderate-to-severe PDP in the lower limbs The pain intended to treat has been present for more than 12 months Previous treatment has been unsuccessful (insufficient pain relief and/or unacceptable side-effects) with drugs from the following drug categories: Amitriptylin or an other tricyclic antidepressant and/or Pregabalin (Lyrica®) or Gabapentin (Neurontin®) and/or Duloxetine (Cymbalta®) and/or Tramadol or strong opioids Patients were treated with 3 drugs from the above mentioned drug categories and followed the treatment algorithm for painful diabetic polyneuropathy according to Jensen. Starting dosage was based on individual patient characteristics. Each drug was tried for at least 3 weeks and dose was raised once, if possible. By insufficient pain relief and/or unacceptable side-effects, the drug treatment was stopped. Patients reached a steady state in medication use and it is not allowed to increase dosage during the study. Mean pain intensity during daytime and/or night time should be 5 or higher measured on a numeric rating scale (NRS). Pain during daytime will be scored 3 times per day during for 4 days according to Jensen. Patient's age is between 18 and 75 years. Exclusion Criteria: The patient has had neuromodulation therapy during the month before the intake Neuropathic pain is most prevalent in the upper limbs (NRS>3) Neuropathy or chronic pain of other origin than diabetes mellitus (NRS> 3) Addiction: drugs, alcohol (> 5E / day) and/or medication Drugs: cocaine, heroine, marihuana. Alcohol: wine, beer, liquor (max 5E / day) Medication: benzodiazepines. Insufficient cooperation from the patient (little motivation, understanding or communication) Blood clotting disorder, when using 2 or more different kinds of anti coagulation Immune deficiency (HIV-positive, corticosteroids with a dose equivalent to > prednisolone 10 mg, immunodepressive, etc.) Peripheral vascular disease without palpable peripheral pulses at both feet (inclusion is possible if pulses are absent, but ankle brachial index is between 0.7 and 1.2 in both feet) Active foot ulceration Life expectancy < 1 year Pacemaker Local infection or other skin disorders at site of incision Psychiatric problems potentially interfering with cooperation in the study Pregnancy Severe cardiac or pulmonary failure (> NYHA classification II) Unstable blood glucose control (change in HbA1c>1,0% in three months prior to inclusion)
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Maarten van Kleef, Prf. Dr.
Organizational Affiliation
Maastricht University Medical Center
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
UMC St. Radboud
City
Nijmegen
State/Province
Gelderland
Country
Netherlands
Facility Name
Maastricht University Medical Center
City
Maastricht
State/Province
Limburg
Country
Netherlands

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
8973433
Citation
Tesfaye S, Watt J, Benbow SJ, Pang KA, Miles J, MacFarlane IA. Electrical spinal-cord stimulation for painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy. Lancet. 1996 Dec 21-28;348(9043):1698-701. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(96)02467-1.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
8876718
Citation
Kumar K, Toth C, Nath RK. Spinal cord stimulation for chronic pain in peripheral neuropathy. Surg Neurol. 1996 Oct;46(4):363-9. doi: 10.1016/s0090-3019(96)00191-7.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
18413161
Citation
de Vos CC, Rajan V, Steenbergen W, van der Aa HE, Buschman HP. Effect and safety of spinal cord stimulation for treatment of chronic pain caused by diabetic neuropathy. J Diabetes Complications. 2009 Jan-Feb;23(1):40-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2007.08.002. Epub 2008 Apr 16.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
15787662
Citation
Daousi C, Benbow SJ, MacFarlane IA. Electrical spinal cord stimulation in the long-term treatment of chronic painful diabetic neuropathy. Diabet Med. 2005 Apr;22(4):393-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2004.01410.x.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
34854473
Citation
O'Connell NE, Ferraro MC, Gibson W, Rice AS, Vase L, Coyle D, Eccleston C. Implanted spinal neuromodulation interventions for chronic pain in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Dec 2;12(12):CD013756. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013756.pub2.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
29109298
Citation
van Beek M, Geurts JW, Slangen R, Schaper NC, Faber CG, Joosten EA, Dirksen CD, van Dongen RT, van Kuijk SMJ, van Kleef M. Severity of Neuropathy Is Associated With Long-term Spinal Cord Stimulation Outcome in Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy: Five-Year Follow-up of a Prospective Two-Center Clinical Trial. Diabetes Care. 2018 Jan;41(1):32-38. doi: 10.2337/dc17-0983. Epub 2017 Nov 6.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
27965045
Citation
Slangen R, Faber CG, Schaper NC, Joosten EA, van Dongen RT, Kessels AG, van Kleef M, Dirksen CD. A Trial-Based Economic Evaluation Comparing Spinal Cord Stimulation With Best Medical Treatment in Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy. J Pain. 2017 Apr;18(4):405-414. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2016.11.014. Epub 2016 Dec 11.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
26116722
Citation
van Beek M, Slangen R, Schaper NC, Faber CG, Joosten EA, Dirksen CD, van Dongen RT, Kessels AG, van Kleef M. Sustained Treatment Effect of Spinal Cord Stimulation in Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy: 24-Month Follow-up of a Prospective Two-Center Randomized Controlled Trial. Diabetes Care. 2015 Sep;38(9):e132-4. doi: 10.2337/dc15-0740. Epub 2015 Jun 26. No abstract available.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
25216508
Citation
Slangen R, Schaper NC, Faber CG, Joosten EA, Dirksen CD, van Dongen RT, Kessels AG, van Kleef M. Spinal cord stimulation and pain relief in painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy: a prospective two-center randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Care. 2014 Nov;37(11):3016-24. doi: 10.2337/dc14-0684. Epub 2014 Sep 11.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Effect of Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) in Painful Diabetic Polyneuropathy

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs