search
Back to results

Efficacy of Cognitive Remediation in Patients With Schizophrenia or Schizoaffective Disorder Stabilized on Lurasidone

Primary Purpose

Schizophrenia

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Cognitive Remediation
Sponsored by
New York State Psychiatric Institute
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Schizophrenia focused on measuring Cognition, Function, Attention, Vigilance, Verbal Memory, Visual Memory, Processing Speed, Problem Solving, Social Cognition

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 55 Years (Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male or female between 18-55 years of age who meet DSM-IV-TR criteria for schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder confirmed by the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Clinical trial version (SCID-CT version). Duration of illness > 1 year. Outpatient status.
  • Change in antipsychotic medication is clinically warranted as evidenced by

    • persistent psychosis despite adequate dose and duration of antipsychotic, or * inability to achieve therapeutic dose because of dose-limiting side effects,
    • persistent side effects that either cause significant subjective distress or significantly increase medical risks, such as substantial weight gain or metabolic disturbances, or
    • patient preference to switch and treating psychiatrist is in agreement.
  • No behaviors suggesting potential danger to self or others over the 6 months prior to participation.
  • For the last 2 weeks of lurasidone stabilization phase, a score of 4 or less on PANSS items of conceptual disorganization, hallucinations, suspiciousness and unusual thought content items.
  • At end of lurasidone stabilization phase, Simpson-Angus Scale total score <
  • At end of lurasidone stabilization phase, Calgary Depression Scale total score <10.
  • No acute medical problems; any chronic medical condition (e.g. hypertension) consistently treated and stable during the 1 month prior to participation.
  • Able to provide signed informed consent and to cooperate with all study procedures.
  • Able to attend twice weekly sessions (each lasting approximately 75 minutes) for cognitive remediation or active control sessions for the ~6 month duration of the cognitive remediation phase of the study.
  • Must meet the following cognitive performance criteria:

    • Able to complete the baseline MATRICS validly at baseline as assessed by NP tester.
    • Raw score of 12 or greater on the WTAR (Wechsler Test of Adult Reading) at screening.
  • Women who can become pregnant must be using an adequate method of contraception to avoid pregnancy throughout the study and for up to 4 weeks after the study in such a manner that the risk of pregnancy is minimized. Acceptable methods include oral, injectable or implanted contraceptives, intrauterine devices or barrier methods such as condoms, diaphragm and spermicides. Women who can become pregnant must have a negative urine pregnancy test at the Screening Visit. Women who can become pregnant include anyone who has experienced menarche and who has not undergone successful surgical sterilization (hysterectomy, bilateral tubal ligation or bilateral oophorectomy), or is not postmenopausal (defined as amenorrhea 12 consecutive months).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Documented history of learning disability.
  • Hearing or visual impairment; not fluent in English.
  • Current treatment with clozapine or history of treatment resistance as evidenced by failure to improve (in the judgment of the investigator) with 2 or more adequate dose antipsychotic trials of at least 6 weeks duration in preceding 1 year.
  • Concomitant or anticipated treatment with potent CYP 3A4 inhibitor such a cimetidine, cyclosporine, erythromycin or erythromycin-like drugs (e.g., azithromycin, clarithromycin except short term acute treatment for 1 week or less), diltiazem, itraconazole, ketoconazole or other systemic antifungal agents in the azole class, nefazodone; or potent CYP3A4 inducer including: carbamazepine, modafinil, Phenobarbital, phenytoin, rifampin, St. Johns Wort, and troglitazone.
  • Current treatment with psychotropic agents known to affect cognition such as amphetamines, topiramate.
  • History of treatment with electroconvulsive therapy within the 6 months prior to participation or expectation that patient may require ECT during the study.
  • History of neurological or neuropsychiatric conditions (e.g. stroke, traumatic brain injury, epilepsy, etc).
  • Subjects with a history of clinically significant neurological, metabolic, hepatic, renal, hematological, pulmonary, cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, and/or urological disorders (e.g. unstable angina, decompensate congestive heart failure, CNS infection or history of HIV seropositivity), which would pose a risk to the patient if they were to participate in the study or that might confound the results of the study. Active medical conditions that are minor or well controlled are not exclusionary if they do not affect risk to the patient of the study results. For example, the following are not exclusionary: a) stable and well-controlled hypertension; b) asthma (no serious attacks in the past year); c) hypothyroidism (TSH within normal limits).
  • A positive test for Hepatitis C antibody with concurrent evidence of impaired hepatic function (increased AST or ALT greater than 2 times the upper limit of normal) or positive tests for Hepatitis A antibody IgM fraction or Hepatitis B surface antigen, irrespective of the AST or ALT values.
  • History of alcohol or substance abuse or dependence during the 6 months prior to participation.
  • Participation in a clinical trial involving an investigational medication within 3 months prior to participation or 2 or more investigational drug trials in the preceding 12 months.
  • Pregnant women or women of child-bearing potential who are not using adequate birth control.
  • Woman who are breast feeding.
  • Individuals who: a) received any cognitive remediation in the 6 months prior to study entry or b)received more than 6 hours of cognitive remediation in the 12 months prior to study entry or c) received more than 15 hours in the 24 months prior to study entry. Cognitive remediation is defined as any behavioral intervention consisting of training activities that aim to target impairments in cognitive domains of sensory processing, attention, memory, processing speed, working memory, and executive functioning.

Sites / Locations

  • San Fernando Mental Health Center
  • University of California - Irvine
  • Yale University
  • University of Miami Department of Psychiatry
  • Medical College of Georgia
  • Northwestern University
  • Rush University Psychiatric Clinical Research Center
  • Indiana University
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
  • University of Minnesota
  • University of Missouri
  • Columbia University
  • Psychopharmacology Research Unit- Nathan KIine Institute for Psychiatric Research
  • Duke University Medical Center
  • University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas
  • University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

No Intervention

Arm Label

Cognitive Remediation

Cognitive activity control group

Arm Description

Cognitive remediation intervention will be administered in small group settings twice weekly for 30 sessions and will utilize computerized and verbal group training exercises to address basic skills such as auditory processing, attention, processing speed, and verbal working memory and learning, as well as intermediate and complex skills such as deductive reasoning, planning and sequencing, set shifting, and complex problem solving.

This is a non-specific mental activity control condition, conducted two times per week for a total of 30 sessions.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Cognitive Function Measured by MCCB Composite Score
The MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB) will be used to assess cognitive function. The MCCB composite score is comprised of sub-scale measures of: a) working memory; b) attention and vigilance; c) verbal learning; d) visual learning; e) speed of processing; f) reason and problem solving; and g) social cognition. The MCCB takes 90 minutes or less to complete. MCCB assessed 4 times: prestabilization (screening), randomization (after 6-8 weeks of lurasidone stabilization, prior to initial cognitive remediation), midpoint (after 20 cognitive remediation session), and study completion (final visit after 30 cognitive remediation sessions). MCCB composite scores are reported as t-scores where a t-score = 50 is the population average. Every 10 points is one standard deviation. There is no range as scores are as far from population average.
Cognitive Function as Measured by the University of California, San Diego, Performance-Based Skills Assessment-Brief (UPSA-B) Scale
The UPSA-B assesses functional capacity to perform tasks similar to those in daily life. Raw scores are converted into scaled scores ranging from 0-100, with higher scores indicating better functional capacity.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Cognition as Measured by Cognitive Assessment Interview (CAI)
Cognitive Assessment Interview was used to obtain information about cognitive functioning from both subject and an informant. Composite CAI scores were reported. Scale ranges from 1-7 with the following anchors: Normal, no cognitive impairment Borderline impairment Mildly impaired Moderately impaired Markedly impaired Severely impaired Among the most extremely impaired
Efficacy as Measured by Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS)
Total PANSS score with 30 items. Each item is rated 1-7 so the minimum Total PANSS score =30 and the maximum is 210. Anchors for each item are as follows, the higher values represent an increase in severity of symptoms: Absent Minimal Mild Moderate Moderately severe Severe Extremely severe

Full Information

First Posted
July 8, 2010
Last Updated
February 28, 2017
Sponsor
New York State Psychiatric Institute
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01173874
Brief Title
Efficacy of Cognitive Remediation in Patients With Schizophrenia or Schizoaffective Disorder Stabilized on Lurasidone
Official Title
Clinical and Biomarker Assessment of Efficacy of Cognitive Remediation in Patients With Schizophrenia or Schizoaffective Disorder Stabilized on Lurasidone
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
February 2017
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
July 2010 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
October 2013 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
November 2013 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
New York State Psychiatric Institute

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The investigators hypothesize that cognitive remediation will be superior to the active control group on the change from baseline to study end point of cognitive remediation phase on both co-primary outcome measures (standardized composite MATRICS score and Cognitive Assessment Interview).
Detailed Description
OVERVIEW & SPECIFIC AIMS Marked cognitive impairment underlies much of the social & occupational dysfunction associated with schizophrenia. Currently available antipsychotic medications are primarily effective in treating psychotic symptoms & have demonstrated only limited potential in ameliorating cognitive deficits in schizophrenia patients. Lurasidone is a novel compound synthesized by SEPRACOR, Inc.for the treatment of patients with schizophrenia & bipolar disorder. It possesses high affinity for dopamine D2, serotonin 5-HT2A, 5-HT7, 5-HT1A & noradrenaline α2C receptors. Compared with other atypical antipsychotics, lurasidone demonstrates similar binding affinities for the D2 & 5-HT2A receptors, but greater affinity for serotonin 5-HT1A receptors. Lurasidone displays no affinity for histamine H1 or acetylcholine M1 receptors. In animal studies, lurasidone significantly reversed memory impairment induced by MK-801, an N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist, in a rat step-through type passive avoidance task. The maximum inhibitory effects of lurasidone were greater than those observed with risperidone, quetiapine, & olanzapine, while aripiprazole was not effective in reversing the impairment induced by MK-801. Additionally, lurasidone significantly reversed memory impairment induced by the anticholinergic drug scopolamine in the passive avoidance task. The reversal of pharmacologically induced cognitive deficits in rats by lurasidone is promising & warrants specific investigation in subjects with schizophrenia, given the prominence of cognitive deficits in this disorder. From a different therapeutic perspective, the utility of cognitive remediation in ameliorating cognitive deficits & improving functional outcomes in schizophrenia has recently been evaluated in several studies. A meta-analysis of these trials found effect sizes for improvement in cognitive & psychosocial functioning in the low to moderate range (McGurck 2007). The best outcomes in psychosocial functioning were evident when cognitive remediation was combined with teaching of psychosocial skills. Given the recalcitrant nature of cognitive deficits in schizophrenia & their impact on functional capacity we felt that in designing a study to test the effectiveness of cognitive remediation we should maximize the likelihood of therapeutic benefit by administering cognitive remediation in the context of pharmacotherapy that may have potential for precognitive effects. By so doing we could possibly boost the effect sizes seen with cognitive remediation alone. In this study we will transition patients with schizophrenia (in whom a change in antipsychotic therapy is clinically warranted) from their current antipsychotic to lurasidone - clinicians will have eight weeks to complete the switch. Subjects who are successfully switched to lurasidone will then be randomized to receive either cognitive remediation or a non-specific mental activity control condition two times/week for a total of 30 sessions over a 4-6 month period. Our goal is to have 140 patients complete the cognitive remediation phase. A subset of the sample will participate in 2 biomarker studies. Event related potentials & fMRI will be done in these subjects at baseline & study completion. This study will be done as an Investigator initiated trial (J. Lieberman, M.D. - PI) under a separate IND. Primary Aim: We hypothesize that cognitive remediation will be superior to the active control group on the change from baseline to study end point of cognitive remediation phase on both co-primary outcome measures (standardized composite MATRICS score & Cognitive Assessment Interview). Additional aims To compare cognitive remediation to active control on functional outcome as assessed by the change in UCSD Performance-Based Skills Assessment (UPSA-Brief) from baseline to end point of cognitive remediation phase. To compare cognitive remediation to active control on changes from lurasidone stabilized baseline to end point in indices of functional brain activation (ERP & fMRI) during cognitive activation tasks. Evaluate the effect of 8 weeks of lurasidone treatment on cognitive & functional outcomes as assessed by changes from baseline in the MATRICS composite score, CAI, & UPSA-Brief. Evaluate the effect of cognitive remediation compared to nonspecific mental activity on cognitive & functional outcomes as assessed by changes from lurasidone stabilized baseline to end of cognitive remediation phase in the MATRICS composite score, CAI, & UPSA-Brief. Evaluate the efficacy, safety, & tolerability of lurasidone in patients with schizophrenia as assessed by the change from baseline to week 8 & to end of cognitive remediation phase in the PANSS total score, Side Effect Checklist, AIMS, SAS, BAS, & frequency of abnormal laboratory values.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Schizophrenia
Keywords
Cognition, Function, Attention, Vigilance, Verbal Memory, Visual Memory, Processing Speed, Problem Solving, Social Cognition

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Outcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
120 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Cognitive Remediation
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Cognitive remediation intervention will be administered in small group settings twice weekly for 30 sessions and will utilize computerized and verbal group training exercises to address basic skills such as auditory processing, attention, processing speed, and verbal working memory and learning, as well as intermediate and complex skills such as deductive reasoning, planning and sequencing, set shifting, and complex problem solving.
Arm Title
Cognitive activity control group
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
This is a non-specific mental activity control condition, conducted two times per week for a total of 30 sessions.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Cognitive Remediation
Intervention Description
Cognitive remediation intervention will be administered in small group settings twice weekly for 30 sessions and will utilize computerized and verbal group training exercises to address basic skills such as auditory processing, attention, processing speed, and verbal working memory and learning, as well as intermediate and complex skills such as deductive reasoning, planning and sequencing, set shifting, and complex problem solving.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Cognitive Function Measured by MCCB Composite Score
Description
The MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB) will be used to assess cognitive function. The MCCB composite score is comprised of sub-scale measures of: a) working memory; b) attention and vigilance; c) verbal learning; d) visual learning; e) speed of processing; f) reason and problem solving; and g) social cognition. The MCCB takes 90 minutes or less to complete. MCCB assessed 4 times: prestabilization (screening), randomization (after 6-8 weeks of lurasidone stabilization, prior to initial cognitive remediation), midpoint (after 20 cognitive remediation session), and study completion (final visit after 30 cognitive remediation sessions). MCCB composite scores are reported as t-scores where a t-score = 50 is the population average. Every 10 points is one standard deviation. There is no range as scores are as far from population average.
Time Frame
4-6 month period
Title
Cognitive Function as Measured by the University of California, San Diego, Performance-Based Skills Assessment-Brief (UPSA-B) Scale
Description
The UPSA-B assesses functional capacity to perform tasks similar to those in daily life. Raw scores are converted into scaled scores ranging from 0-100, with higher scores indicating better functional capacity.
Time Frame
4-6 month period
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Cognition as Measured by Cognitive Assessment Interview (CAI)
Description
Cognitive Assessment Interview was used to obtain information about cognitive functioning from both subject and an informant. Composite CAI scores were reported. Scale ranges from 1-7 with the following anchors: Normal, no cognitive impairment Borderline impairment Mildly impaired Moderately impaired Markedly impaired Severely impaired Among the most extremely impaired
Time Frame
4-6 month period
Title
Efficacy as Measured by Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS)
Description
Total PANSS score with 30 items. Each item is rated 1-7 so the minimum Total PANSS score =30 and the maximum is 210. Anchors for each item are as follows, the higher values represent an increase in severity of symptoms: Absent Minimal Mild Moderate Moderately severe Severe Extremely severe
Time Frame
4-6 month period

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
55 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Male or female between 18-55 years of age who meet DSM-IV-TR criteria for schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder confirmed by the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Clinical trial version (SCID-CT version). Duration of illness > 1 year. Outpatient status. Change in antipsychotic medication is clinically warranted as evidenced by persistent psychosis despite adequate dose and duration of antipsychotic, or * inability to achieve therapeutic dose because of dose-limiting side effects, persistent side effects that either cause significant subjective distress or significantly increase medical risks, such as substantial weight gain or metabolic disturbances, or patient preference to switch and treating psychiatrist is in agreement. No behaviors suggesting potential danger to self or others over the 6 months prior to participation. For the last 2 weeks of lurasidone stabilization phase, a score of 4 or less on PANSS items of conceptual disorganization, hallucinations, suspiciousness and unusual thought content items. At end of lurasidone stabilization phase, Simpson-Angus Scale total score < At end of lurasidone stabilization phase, Calgary Depression Scale total score <10. No acute medical problems; any chronic medical condition (e.g. hypertension) consistently treated and stable during the 1 month prior to participation. Able to provide signed informed consent and to cooperate with all study procedures. Able to attend twice weekly sessions (each lasting approximately 75 minutes) for cognitive remediation or active control sessions for the ~6 month duration of the cognitive remediation phase of the study. Must meet the following cognitive performance criteria: Able to complete the baseline MATRICS validly at baseline as assessed by NP tester. Raw score of 12 or greater on the WTAR (Wechsler Test of Adult Reading) at screening. Women who can become pregnant must be using an adequate method of contraception to avoid pregnancy throughout the study and for up to 4 weeks after the study in such a manner that the risk of pregnancy is minimized. Acceptable methods include oral, injectable or implanted contraceptives, intrauterine devices or barrier methods such as condoms, diaphragm and spermicides. Women who can become pregnant must have a negative urine pregnancy test at the Screening Visit. Women who can become pregnant include anyone who has experienced menarche and who has not undergone successful surgical sterilization (hysterectomy, bilateral tubal ligation or bilateral oophorectomy), or is not postmenopausal (defined as amenorrhea 12 consecutive months). Exclusion Criteria: Documented history of learning disability. Hearing or visual impairment; not fluent in English. Current treatment with clozapine or history of treatment resistance as evidenced by failure to improve (in the judgment of the investigator) with 2 or more adequate dose antipsychotic trials of at least 6 weeks duration in preceding 1 year. Concomitant or anticipated treatment with potent CYP 3A4 inhibitor such a cimetidine, cyclosporine, erythromycin or erythromycin-like drugs (e.g., azithromycin, clarithromycin except short term acute treatment for 1 week or less), diltiazem, itraconazole, ketoconazole or other systemic antifungal agents in the azole class, nefazodone; or potent CYP3A4 inducer including: carbamazepine, modafinil, Phenobarbital, phenytoin, rifampin, St. Johns Wort, and troglitazone. Current treatment with psychotropic agents known to affect cognition such as amphetamines, topiramate. History of treatment with electroconvulsive therapy within the 6 months prior to participation or expectation that patient may require ECT during the study. History of neurological or neuropsychiatric conditions (e.g. stroke, traumatic brain injury, epilepsy, etc). Subjects with a history of clinically significant neurological, metabolic, hepatic, renal, hematological, pulmonary, cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, and/or urological disorders (e.g. unstable angina, decompensate congestive heart failure, CNS infection or history of HIV seropositivity), which would pose a risk to the patient if they were to participate in the study or that might confound the results of the study. Active medical conditions that are minor or well controlled are not exclusionary if they do not affect risk to the patient of the study results. For example, the following are not exclusionary: a) stable and well-controlled hypertension; b) asthma (no serious attacks in the past year); c) hypothyroidism (TSH within normal limits). A positive test for Hepatitis C antibody with concurrent evidence of impaired hepatic function (increased AST or ALT greater than 2 times the upper limit of normal) or positive tests for Hepatitis A antibody IgM fraction or Hepatitis B surface antigen, irrespective of the AST or ALT values. History of alcohol or substance abuse or dependence during the 6 months prior to participation. Participation in a clinical trial involving an investigational medication within 3 months prior to participation or 2 or more investigational drug trials in the preceding 12 months. Pregnant women or women of child-bearing potential who are not using adequate birth control. Woman who are breast feeding. Individuals who: a) received any cognitive remediation in the 6 months prior to study entry or b)received more than 6 hours of cognitive remediation in the 12 months prior to study entry or c) received more than 15 hours in the 24 months prior to study entry. Cognitive remediation is defined as any behavioral intervention consisting of training activities that aim to target impairments in cognitive domains of sensory processing, attention, memory, processing speed, working memory, and executive functioning.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jeffrey Lieberman, M.D.
Organizational Affiliation
Columbia University
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Zafar Sharif, M.D.
Organizational Affiliation
Columbia University
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
San Fernando Mental Health Center
City
Granada Hills
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
91344
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of California - Irvine
City
Orange
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92868
Country
United States
Facility Name
Yale University
City
New Haven
State/Province
Connecticut
ZIP/Postal Code
06519
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Miami Department of Psychiatry
City
Miami
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33136
Country
United States
Facility Name
Medical College of Georgia
City
Augusta
State/Province
Georgia
ZIP/Postal Code
30912
Country
United States
Facility Name
Northwestern University
City
Chicago
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60611
Country
United States
Facility Name
Rush University Psychiatric Clinical Research Center
City
Chicago
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60612
Country
United States
Facility Name
Indiana University
City
Indianapolis
State/Province
Indiana
ZIP/Postal Code
46222
Country
United States
Facility Name
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
City
Boston
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
02115
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Minnesota
City
Minneapolis
State/Province
Minnesota
ZIP/Postal Code
55454
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Missouri
City
Columbia
State/Province
Missouri
ZIP/Postal Code
65212
Country
United States
Facility Name
Columbia University
City
New York
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
10032
Country
United States
Facility Name
Psychopharmacology Research Unit- Nathan KIine Institute for Psychiatric Research
City
New York
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
10035
Country
United States
Facility Name
Duke University Medical Center
City
Butner
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27509
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas
City
Dallas
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
75390
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio
City
San Antonio
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
78229
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
1736359
Citation
Baddeley A. Working memory. Science. 1992 Jan 31;255(5044):556-9. doi: 10.1126/science.1736359.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15099598
Citation
Bruder GE, Wexler BE, Sage MM, Gil RB, Gorman JM. Verbal memory in schizophrenia: additional evidence of subtypes having different cognitive deficits. Schizophr Res. 2004 Jun 1;68(2-3):137-47. doi: 10.1016/S0920-9964(03)00156-7.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
9734557
Citation
Carter CS, Perlstein W, Ganguli R, Brar J, Mintun M, Cohen JD. Functional hypofrontality and working memory dysfunction in schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry. 1998 Sep;155(9):1285-7. doi: 10.1176/ajp.155.9.1285.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19369319
Citation
Davidson M, Galderisi S, Weiser M, Werbeloff N, Fleischhacker WW, Keefe RS, Boter H, Keet IP, Prelipceanu D, Rybakowski JK, Libiger J, Hummer M, Dollfus S, Lopez-Ibor JJ, Hranov LG, Gaebel W, Peuskens J, Lindefors N, Riecher-Rossler A, Kahn RS. Cognitive effects of antipsychotic drugs in first-episode schizophrenia and schizophreniform disorder: a randomized, open-label clinical trial (EUFEST). Am J Psychiatry. 2009 Jun;166(6):675-82. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2008.08060806. Epub 2009 Apr 15. Erratum In: Am J Psychiatry. 2009 Jun;166(6):731.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
9153028
Citation
Elger CE, Grunwald T, Lehnertz K, Kutas M, Helmstaedter C, Brockhaus A, Van Roost D, Heinze HJ. Human temporal lobe potentials in verbal learning and memory processes. Neuropsychologia. 1997 May;35(5):657-67. doi: 10.1016/s0028-3932(96)00110-8.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19448187
Citation
Fisher M, Holland C, Merzenich MM, Vinogradov S. Using neuroplasticity-based auditory training to improve verbal memory in schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry. 2009 Jul;166(7):805-11. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2009.08050757. Epub 2009 May 15.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
10472417
Citation
Goldman-Rakic PS. The physiological approach: functional architecture of working memory and disordered cognition in schizophrenia. Biol Psychiatry. 1999 Sep 1;46(5):650-61. doi: 10.1016/s0006-3223(99)00130-4.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
7841806
Citation
Goldman-Rakic PS. Working memory dysfunction in schizophrenia. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 1994 Fall;6(4):348-57. doi: 10.1176/jnp.6.4.348.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15531406
Citation
Green MF, Kern RS, Heaton RK. Longitudinal studies of cognition and functional outcome in schizophrenia: implications for MATRICS. Schizophr Res. 2004 Dec 15;72(1):41-51. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2004.09.009.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
8610818
Citation
Green MF. What are the functional consequences of neurocognitive deficits in schizophrenia? Am J Psychiatry. 1996 Mar;153(3):321-30. doi: 10.1176/ajp.153.3.321.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
8167200
Citation
Gur RE, Jaggi JL, Shtasel DL, Ragland JD, Gur RC. Cerebral blood flow in schizophrenia: effects of memory processing on regional activation. Biol Psychiatry. 1994 Jan 1;35(1):3-15. doi: 10.1016/0006-3223(94)91160-6.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
10610049
Citation
Kayser J, Bruder GE, Friedman D, Tenke CE, Amador XF, Clark SC, Malaspina D, Gorman JM. Brain event-related potentials (ERPs) in schizophrenia during a word recognition memory task. Int J Psychophysiol. 1999 Dec;34(3):249-65. doi: 10.1016/s0167-8760(99)00082-3.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16356767
Citation
Kayser J, Tenke CE. Principal components analysis of Laplacian waveforms as a generic method for identifying ERP generator patterns: I. Evaluation with auditory oddball tasks. Clin Neurophysiol. 2006 Feb;117(2):348-68. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2005.08.034. Epub 2005 Dec 13.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16356768
Citation
Kayser J, Tenke CE. Principal components analysis of Laplacian waveforms as a generic method for identifying ERP generator patterns: II. Adequacy of low-density estimates. Clin Neurophysiol. 2006 Feb;117(2):369-80. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2005.08.033. Epub 2005 Dec 13.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16805862
Citation
Kayser J, Tenke CE, Gates NA, Kroppmann CJ, Gil RB, Bruder GE. ERP/CSD indices of impaired verbal working memory subprocesses in schizophrenia. Psychophysiology. 2006 May;43(3):237-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2006.00398.x.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17640266
Citation
Kayser J, Tenke CE, Gates NA, Bruder GE. Reference-independent ERP old/new effects of auditory and visual word recognition memory: Joint extraction of stimulus- and response-locked neuronal generator patterns. Psychophysiology. 2007 Nov;44(6):949-67. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2007.00562.x. Epub 2007 Jul 19.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19539269
Citation
Sambataro F, Reed JD, Murty VP, Das S, Tan HY, Callicott JH, Weinberger DR, Mattay VS. Catechol-O-methyltransferase valine(158)methionine polymorphism modulates brain networks underlying working memory across adulthood. Biol Psychiatry. 2009 Sep 15;66(6):540-8. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2009.04.014. Epub 2009 Jun 17.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
18056233
Citation
McGurk SR, Twamley EW, Sitzer DI, McHugo GJ, Mueser KT. A meta-analysis of cognitive remediation in schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry. 2007 Dec;164(12):1791-802. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2007.07060906.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15515151
Citation
McMahon RP, Arndt S, Conley RR. More powerful two-sample tests for differences in repeated measures of adverse effects in psychiatric trials when only some patients may be at risk. Stat Med. 2005 Jan 15;24(1):11-21. doi: 10.1002/sim.1837.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
8879463
Citation
Mozley LH, Gur RC, Gur RE, Mozley PD, Alavi A. Relationships between verbal memory performance and the cerebral distribution of fluorodeoxyglucose in patients with schizophrenia. Biol Psychiatry. 1996 Sep 15;40(6):443-51. doi: 10.1016/0006-3223(95)00421-1.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
11747097
Citation
Nichols TE, Holmes AP. Nonparametric permutation tests for functional neuroimaging: a primer with examples. Hum Brain Mapp. 2002 Jan;15(1):1-25. doi: 10.1002/hbm.1058.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15531405
Citation
Nuechterlein KH, Barch DM, Gold JM, Goldberg TE, Green MF, Heaton RK. Identification of separable cognitive factors in schizophrenia. Schizophr Res. 2004 Dec 15;72(1):29-39. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2004.09.007.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
1449384
Citation
Park S, Holzman PS. Schizophrenics show spatial working memory deficits. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1992 Dec;49(12):975-82. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1992.01820120063009.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
2464490
Citation
Perrin F, Pernier J, Bertrand O, Echallier JF. Spherical splines for scalp potential and current density mapping. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1989 Feb;72(2):184-7. doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(89)90180-6.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
11431234
Citation
Ragland JD, Gur RC, Raz J, Schroeder L, Kohler CG, Smith RJ, Alavi A, Gur RE. Effect of schizophrenia on frontotemporal activity during word encoding and recognition: a PET cerebral blood flow study. Am J Psychiatry. 2001 Jul;158(7):1114-25. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.158.7.1114.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
2069492
Citation
Saykin AJ, Gur RC, Gur RE, Mozley PD, Mozley LH, Resnick SM, Kester DB, Stafiniak P. Neuropsychological function in schizophrenia. Selective impairment in memory and learning. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1991 Jul;48(7):618-24. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1991.01810310036007.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
11743939
Citation
Weinberger DR, Egan MF, Bertolino A, Callicott JH, Mattay VS, Lipska BK, Berman KF, Goldberg TE. Prefrontal neurons and the genetics of schizophrenia. Biol Psychiatry. 2001 Dec 1;50(11):825-44. doi: 10.1016/s0006-3223(01)01252-5.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
9862552
Citation
Wexler BE, Stevens AA, Bowers AA, Sernyak MJ, Goldman-Rakic PS. Word and tone working memory deficits in schizophrenia. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1998 Dec;55(12):1093-6. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.55.12.1093.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
12151286
Citation
Wykes T, Brammer M, Mellers J, Bray P, Reeder C, Williams C, Corner J. Effects on the brain of a psychological treatment: cognitive remediation therapy: functional magnetic resonance imaging in schizophrenia. Br J Psychiatry. 2002 Aug;181:144-52. doi: 10.1017/s0007125000161872.
Results Reference
background
Citation
Westfall PH. 1997. Multiple testing of general contrasts using logical constraints and correlations, J Am Stat Assoc, 92; 299-306.
Results Reference
background
Citation
Westfall PH, Tobias RD, Rom D, Wolfinger RD, Hochberg Y. Multiple comparisons and multiple tests using the SAS7 system, SAS Institute, Inc., Cary NC, pp. 149-175, 335-343, 1999.
Results Reference
background
Citation
Schafer, JL. Analysis of Incomplete Multivariate Data, New York: Chapman and Hall. 1997
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
12716966
Citation
Mattay VS, Goldberg TE, Fera F, Hariri AR, Tessitore A, Egan MF, Kolachana B, Callicott JH, Weinberger DR. Catechol O-methyltransferase val158-met genotype and individual variation in the brain response to amphetamine. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 May 13;100(10):6186-91. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0931309100. Epub 2003 Apr 25.
Results Reference
background
Citation
Little RJA, and Rubin DB. Statistical Analysis with Missing Data, Second Edition, New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2002.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24591198
Citation
Cohen JD, Forman SD, Braver TS, Casey BJ, Servan-Schreiber D, Noll DC. Activation of the prefrontal cortex in a nonspatial working memory task with functional MRI. Hum Brain Mapp. 1994;1(4):293-304. doi: 10.1002/hbm.460010407.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
2223937
Citation
Friedman D. ERPs during continuous recognition memory for words. Biol Psychol. 1990 Feb;30(1):61-87. doi: 10.1016/0301-0511(90)90091-a.
Results Reference
background
Citation
Holm S. A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 6, 65-70, 1979.
Results Reference
background
Citation
Kayser, J., Tenke, C.E. Consensus on PCA for ERP data, and sensibility of unrestricted solutions. Clinical Neurophysiology, 117(3), 703-707. (2006c).
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
27035157
Citation
Kantrowitz JT, Sharif Z, Medalia A, Keefe RS, Harvey P, Bruder G, Barch DM, Choo T, Lee S, Lieberman JA. A Multicenter, Rater-Blinded, Randomized Controlled Study of Auditory Processing-Focused Cognitive Remediation Combined With Open-Label Lurasidone in Patients With Schizophrenia and Schizoaffective Disorder. J Clin Psychiatry. 2016 Jun;77(6):799-806. doi: 10.4088/JCP.15m09998.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
33539561
Citation
Roberts MT, Lloyd J, Valimaki M, Ho GW, Freemantle M, Bekefi AZ. Video games for people with schizophrenia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Feb 4;2(2):CD012844. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012844.pub2.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Efficacy of Cognitive Remediation in Patients With Schizophrenia or Schizoaffective Disorder Stabilized on Lurasidone

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs