search
Back to results

Effects of Motivational Interviewing in Prison

Primary Purpose

Alcohol Abuse

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
Sweden
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Motivational Interviewing; MI
Sponsored by
Karolinska Institutet
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Alcohol Abuse focused on measuring Inmates with heavy use of alcohol or drugs

Eligibility Criteria

20 Years - 50 Years (Adult)MaleAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Born between 01-01-1954 and 31-12-1984;
  • Conditional release no later than 30-06-2005 (this was extended to 19-09-2005 and again to 31-03-2006);
  • Swedish or Norwegian speaker;
  • Not having previously received BSF in remand or any other prison;
  • Heavy use of alcohol or drugs, measured by the standard prison and probation system: 1= occasional use; 2= heavy use;
  • ASI interview at intake;
  • No order for deportation after release from prison

Exclusion Criteria:

-

Sites / Locations

  • Karolinska Institutet, Dep Clin Neuroscience

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Arm Label

(BSF) MI sessions

(BSF+) MI sessions with supervision

(UPI) Usual Planning Interview

Arm Description

5 semi-structured manualised MI sessions was conducted by existing prison staff having undergone 3 days of Motivational Interviewing workshop training and 2 days of training with the BSF manual.

5 semi-structured manualised MI sessions was conducted by ordinary prison staff having undergone 3 days of Motivational Interviewing workshop training and 2 days of training with the BSF manual, followed by ongoing Motivational Interviewing training with feedback based on audio taped sessions in peer supervision groups.

5 sessions was conducted by prison staff according to usual working practices, with the exception that content was structured into 5 sessions and audio recorded. The provision of a government decree served as a basis for the intervention, covering planning of prison activities and post release arrangements including strategies for drug use cessation.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

number of days with substance use
alcohol- or drug use as measured by the Addiction Severity Index (ASI) at intake and at 10 months after release

Secondary Outcome Measures

reported days of illegal activity
as measured by Addiction Severity Index at intake and 10 months after release
number of days working
as measured by the Addiction Severity Index at intake and 10 months after release

Full Information

First Posted
August 18, 2010
Last Updated
August 18, 2010
Sponsor
Karolinska Institutet
Collaborators
the research committee of the National Prison and Probation Administration
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01184612
Brief Title
Effects of Motivational Interviewing in Prison
Official Title
Motivational Interviewing Delivered by Existing Prison Staff: A Randomized Controlled Study of Effectiveness on Substance Use After Release
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
October 2003
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
April 2004 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
March 2007 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
July 2008 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Name of the Sponsor
Karolinska Institutet
Collaborators
the research committee of the National Prison and Probation Administration

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Motivational Interviewing (MI) is a communication style demonstrated to decrease drug and alcohol use. A five session MI intervention (BSF) was implemented in the Swedish correctional system. The intervention was delivered by counsellors with workshop only MI training (BSF) or by counsellors with workshop MI training followed by peer group supervision based on audio taped feedback (BSF+). Aim was to examine whether BSF in prisons reduces drug and alcohol use more effectively than interviews conducted according to the usual planning interview routine (UPI).

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Alcohol Abuse
Keywords
Inmates with heavy use of alcohol or drugs

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Masking
Outcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
296 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
(BSF) MI sessions
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
5 semi-structured manualised MI sessions was conducted by existing prison staff having undergone 3 days of Motivational Interviewing workshop training and 2 days of training with the BSF manual.
Arm Title
(BSF+) MI sessions with supervision
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
5 semi-structured manualised MI sessions was conducted by ordinary prison staff having undergone 3 days of Motivational Interviewing workshop training and 2 days of training with the BSF manual, followed by ongoing Motivational Interviewing training with feedback based on audio taped sessions in peer supervision groups.
Arm Title
(UPI) Usual Planning Interview
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
5 sessions was conducted by prison staff according to usual working practices, with the exception that content was structured into 5 sessions and audio recorded. The provision of a government decree served as a basis for the intervention, covering planning of prison activities and post release arrangements including strategies for drug use cessation.
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Motivational Interviewing; MI
Intervention Description
MI is a communication style defined as a collaborative, person-centred form of guiding to elicit and strengthen motivation to change. The method is based on four principles: showing empathy; developing discrepancy between the subject's current behaviour and an alternate, more desired, behaviour; reinforcing self-efficacy; and "rolling" with resistance to change. Client arguments for change are elicited and reinforced in an atmosphere that is empathic, collaborative and supportive of autonomy. The choice to change and the responsibility for change remain with the client.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
number of days with substance use
Description
alcohol- or drug use as measured by the Addiction Severity Index (ASI) at intake and at 10 months after release
Time Frame
of the last 30 days
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
reported days of illegal activity
Description
as measured by Addiction Severity Index at intake and 10 months after release
Time Frame
during the preceding 30 days
Title
number of days working
Description
as measured by the Addiction Severity Index at intake and 10 months after release
Time Frame
during the last 30 days

10. Eligibility

Sex
Male
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
20 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
50 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Born between 01-01-1954 and 31-12-1984; Conditional release no later than 30-06-2005 (this was extended to 19-09-2005 and again to 31-03-2006); Swedish or Norwegian speaker; Not having previously received BSF in remand or any other prison; Heavy use of alcohol or drugs, measured by the standard prison and probation system: 1= occasional use; 2= heavy use; ASI interview at intake; No order for deportation after release from prison Exclusion Criteria: -
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Lars G Forsberg, Ph D
Organizational Affiliation
Karolinska Institutet
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Karolinska Institutet, Dep Clin Neuroscience
City
Stockholm
ZIP/Postal Code
S-171 76
Country
Sweden

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

Effects of Motivational Interviewing in Prison

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs