Study Comparing Orteronel Plus Prednisone in Participants With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.
Primary Purpose
Prostate Cancer
Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Orteronel
Prednisone
Orteronel Placebo
Sponsored by

About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Prostate Cancer focused on measuring Drug therapy
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Each participant must meet all of the following inclusion criteria:
- Voluntary written consent
- Male 18 years or older
- Histologically or cytologically confirmed diagnosis of prostate adenocarcinoma
- Radiograph-documented metastatic disease
- Progressive disease
- Prior surgical castration or concurrent use of an agent for medical castration
- Progressive disease during or following 1 or 2 regimens of cytotoxic chemotherapy, 1 of which must have included docetaxel. Must have received greater than or equal to (>=) 360 milligram per square meter (mg/m^2) of docetaxel within a 6-month period. Participants who were clearly intolerant to docetaxel or develop progressive disease before receiving >= 360 mg/m^2 are also eligible if they have received at least 225 mg/m^2 of docetaxel within a 6-month period and meet the other study entry criteria.
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0 to 2
- Even if surgically sterilized, participants must practice effective barrier contraception during the entire study treatment period and for 4 months after the last dose of study drug, OR Abstain from heterosexual intercourse
- Screening laboratory values as specified in protocol
- Stable medical condition
- Life expectancy of 6 months or more
- Participants who have had up to 2 prior chemotherapy treatments are eligible to participate
Exclusion Criteria:
Participants meeting any of the following exclusion criteria are not to be enrolled in the study:
- Known hypersensitivity to orteronel, prednisone or gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogue
- Received prior therapy with orteronel, aminoglutethimide, ketoconazole or abiraterone
- Any other therapies for prostate cancer, except for GnRH analogue therapy, must be discontinued 2 weeks before the first dose of study drug
- Radioisotope therapy or external beam radiation therapy within 4 weeks of first dose of study drug
- Documented central nervous system metastases
- Treatment with any investigational compound within 30 days prior to first dose of study drug (Participants who are in long-term follow-up following active treatment in other trials are eligible)
- Diagnosis or treatment of another malignancy within 2 years preceding first dose of study drug except nonmelanoma skin cancer or in situ malignancy completely resected
- Uncontrolled cardiovascular condition as specified in study protocol
- Known history of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, hepatitis B, or hepatitis C
- Unwilling or unable to comply with protocol
- Known gastrointestinal disease or procedure that could interfere with oral absorption or tolerance of orteronel
- Uncontrolled nausea, vomiting, or diarrhea despite appropriate medical therapy
- Prostate cancer confined to just the prostrate bed or immediate adjacent tissue
Sites / Locations
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Placebo Comparator
Arm Label
Orteronel + prednisone
Placebo + prednisone
Arm Description
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Overall Survival
Overall survival was calculated from the date of participant randomization to the date of participant death due to any cause. Participants without documentation of death at time of the analysis were censored as of the date the participant was last known to be alive, or the data cutoff date, whichever was earlier.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Radiographic Progression-free Survival (rPFS)
rPFS was defined as the time from randomization until radiographic disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Radiographic disease progression was defined as the occurrence of 1 or more of the following: The appearance of 2 or more new lesions on radionuclide bone scan as defined by prostate cancer working group (PCWG)2; Should 2 or more new bone lesions be evident at the first assessment (8-week assessment) on treatment, 2 or more additional new lesions must have been evident on a confirmatory assessment at least 6 weeks later; One or more new soft tissue/visceral organ lesions identified by computed tomography (CT)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); Progression as defined by response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) 1.1 criteria.
Percentage of Participants Achieving 50 Percent Reduction From Baseline in Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA50 Response) at Week 12
The PSA50 was defined as the percentage of participants who had a PSA decline of at least 50 percent (%) from baseline.
Percentage of Participants With Pain Response at Week 12
Pain response was defined as the occurrence of 1 of the following and confirmed by an additional assessment, at least 3 weeks but not more than 5 weeks later: A greater than or equal to (>=) 2 point reduction from baseline in BPI-SF worst pain score without an increase in analgesic use; or a 25 percent (%) or more reduction in analgesic use from baseline without an increase in worst pain score from baseline.
Number of Participants Reporting One or More Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination Findings
Number of Participants With TEAEs Related to Vital Signs
Number of Participants With TEAEs Related to Weight
Number of Participants With Worst Change From Baseline in Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status
ECOG assessed participant's performance status on 5 point scale: 0=Fully active/able to carry on all pre-disease activities without restriction; 1=restricted in physically strenuous activity, ambulatory/able to carry out light or sedentary work; 2=ambulatory (>50% of waking hours [hrs]), capable of all self care, unable to carry out any work activities; 3=capable of only limited self care, confined to bed/chair >50% of waking hrs; 4=completely disabled, cannot carry on any self care, totally confined to bed/chair; 5=dead. Worst change was defined as the worst overall change that occurred in ECOG status at any measured time point during the treatment period.
Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings
Number of Participants With TEAEs Categorized Into Investigations Related to Chemistry, Hematology or Steroid Hormone Panel
Percentage of Participants Achieving PSA50 Response at Any Time During the Study
The PSA50 was defined as the percentage of participants who had a PSA decline of at least 50% from baseline.
Percentage of Participants Achieving 90 Percent Reduction From Baseline in Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA90 Response) at Week 12
The PSA90 was defined as the percentage of participants who had a PSA decline of at least 90% from baseline.
Percentage of Participants Achieving PSA90 Response at Any Time During the Study
The PSA90 was defined as the percentage of participants who had a PSA decline of at least 90% from baseline.
Best PSA Response at Any Time During the Study
The PSA50 was defined as the percentage of participants who had a PSA decline of at least 50% from baseline. PSA90 was defined as the percentage of participants who had a PSA decline of at least 90% from baseline.
Time to PSA Progression
Time to PSA progression was defined as time from randomization to a PSA increase of 25% and PSA rise of at least 2 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) above the lowest value observed post baseline or, if no PSA decline occurred post baseline, above the baseline PSA.
Number of Participants With Shifts From Baseline Between Favorable and Unfavorable Categories in Circulating Tumor Cell Count (CTC)
A favorable CTC count was defined as less than (<) 5 counts per (/) 7.5 mililiter (mL) in whole blood. An unfavorable CTC count was defined as >=5 counts/7.5 mL in whole blood.
Percentage of Participants With Objective Response
Percentage of participants with objective response based assessment of confirmed complete response (CR) or confirmed partial response (PR) according to RECIST 1.1. The overall objective response was defined as a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR). A complete response (CR) was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions determined by computerized tomography (CT) or MRI. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have had reduction in short axis to <10 millimetre (mm). A PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of longest diameters of non-lymph node lesions and of the short diameter(s) or short axis of lymph nodes.
Time to Pain Progression
Time to pain progression was defined as the time from participant randomization to the first assessment date of pain progression. Pain progression was defined as the occurrence of 1 of the following and confirmed by an additional assessment, at least 3 weeks but not more than 5 weeks later: The brief pain inventory-short form (BPI-SF) worst pain score was >= 4 with a >= 2 point increase over baseline in BPI-SF worst pain score with stable or increased analgesic use; The BPI-SF worst pain score was >= 4 but not less than baseline with new or increased (relative to baseline) Step II or Step III analgesic use; The BPI-SF worst pain score was <= 3 but not less than baseline with new or increased (relative to baseline) Step III analgesic use.
Time to Pain Response
Time to pain response was defined as the time from randomization until first pain response. Pain response was defined as the occurrence of 1 of the following and confirmed by an additional assessment, at least 3 weeks but not more than 5 weeks later: A >= 2 point reduction from baseline in BPI-SF worst pain score without an increase in analgesic use, or a 25% or more reduction in analgesic use from baseline without an increase in worst pain score from baseline. The analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier method.
Number of Participants With Best Pain Response
Best pain response was evaluated in participants who had a pain response across the entire study were summarized by treatment group. The pain response was defined as a >=2-point reduction from baseline in BPI-SF worst pain score without an increase in analgesic use, or a 25% or more reduction in analgesic use from baseline without an increase in worst pain score from baseline.
Percentage of Participants With Health-related Quality of Life (HRQOL) Response at Week 12
The global health status or quality of life (QOL) was measured as the HRQOL response rate at 12 weeks using the 2-item global health status index of the european organization for research and treatment of cancer-quality of life questionnaire-C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) instrument. HRQOL response was defined as a 17-point increase from the baseline assessment on the QOL index, after the score had been linearly transformed to a 0 to 100 scale. EORTC QLQ-C30: included 5 functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social), 1 global health status, 3 symptom scales (fatigue, pain, nausea/vomiting) and 6 single items (dyspnoea, appetite loss, insomnia, constipation/diarrhea and financial difficulties). Most questions used 4 point scale (1 'Not at all' to 4 'Very much'; 2 questions used 7-point scale (1 'very poor' to 7 'Excellent'). Scores averaged, transformed to 0-100 scale; higher score representing better level of functioning or greater degree of symptoms.
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT01193257
First Posted
August 31, 2010
Last Updated
November 28, 2018
Sponsor
Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01193257
Brief Title
Study Comparing Orteronel Plus Prednisone in Participants With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.
Official Title
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Multicenter Trial Comparing Orteronel (TAK-700) Plus Prednisone With Placebo Plus Prednisone in Patients With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer That Has Progressed During or Following Docetaxel-based Therapy.
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
November 2018
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
November 15, 2010 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
May 16, 2013 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
February 29, 2016 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
This is a randomized, double-blind, multicenter, phase 3 study evaluating orteronel plus prednisone compared with placebo plus prednisone in men with metastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) that has progressed following Docetaxel-based therapy
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Prostate Cancer
Keywords
Drug therapy
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantInvestigator
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
1099 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Orteronel + prednisone
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Title
Placebo + prednisone
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Orteronel
Other Intervention Name(s)
TAK-700
Intervention Description
Orteronel tablets
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Prednisone
Intervention Description
Prednisone tablets
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Orteronel Placebo
Intervention Description
Orteronel placebo-matching tablets
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Overall Survival
Description
Overall survival was calculated from the date of participant randomization to the date of participant death due to any cause. Participants without documentation of death at time of the analysis were censored as of the date the participant was last known to be alive, or the data cutoff date, whichever was earlier.
Time Frame
Baseline until death (approximately up to 4.5 years)
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Radiographic Progression-free Survival (rPFS)
Description
rPFS was defined as the time from randomization until radiographic disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Radiographic disease progression was defined as the occurrence of 1 or more of the following: The appearance of 2 or more new lesions on radionuclide bone scan as defined by prostate cancer working group (PCWG)2; Should 2 or more new bone lesions be evident at the first assessment (8-week assessment) on treatment, 2 or more additional new lesions must have been evident on a confirmatory assessment at least 6 weeks later; One or more new soft tissue/visceral organ lesions identified by computed tomography (CT)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); Progression as defined by response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) 1.1 criteria.
Time Frame
Baseline until disease progression or death, whichever occurred first (approximately up to 4.5 years)
Title
Percentage of Participants Achieving 50 Percent Reduction From Baseline in Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA50 Response) at Week 12
Description
The PSA50 was defined as the percentage of participants who had a PSA decline of at least 50 percent (%) from baseline.
Time Frame
Week 12
Title
Percentage of Participants With Pain Response at Week 12
Description
Pain response was defined as the occurrence of 1 of the following and confirmed by an additional assessment, at least 3 weeks but not more than 5 weeks later: A greater than or equal to (>=) 2 point reduction from baseline in BPI-SF worst pain score without an increase in analgesic use; or a 25 percent (%) or more reduction in analgesic use from baseline without an increase in worst pain score from baseline.
Time Frame
Week 12
Title
Number of Participants Reporting One or More Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Time Frame
Baseline up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (Cycle 59 Day 58)
Title
Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination Findings
Time Frame
Baseline up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (Cycle 59 Day 58)
Title
Number of Participants With TEAEs Related to Vital Signs
Time Frame
Baseline up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (Cycle 59 Day 58)
Title
Number of Participants With TEAEs Related to Weight
Time Frame
Baseline up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (Cycle 59 Day 58)
Title
Number of Participants With Worst Change From Baseline in Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status
Description
ECOG assessed participant's performance status on 5 point scale: 0=Fully active/able to carry on all pre-disease activities without restriction; 1=restricted in physically strenuous activity, ambulatory/able to carry out light or sedentary work; 2=ambulatory (>50% of waking hours [hrs]), capable of all self care, unable to carry out any work activities; 3=capable of only limited self care, confined to bed/chair >50% of waking hrs; 4=completely disabled, cannot carry on any self care, totally confined to bed/chair; 5=dead. Worst change was defined as the worst overall change that occurred in ECOG status at any measured time point during the treatment period.
Time Frame
Baseline up to End-of-treatment (EOT) (Cycle 59 Day 58)
Title
Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings
Time Frame
Cycle 59 Day 58
Title
Number of Participants With TEAEs Categorized Into Investigations Related to Chemistry, Hematology or Steroid Hormone Panel
Time Frame
Baseline up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (Cycle 59 Day 58)
Title
Percentage of Participants Achieving PSA50 Response at Any Time During the Study
Description
The PSA50 was defined as the percentage of participants who had a PSA decline of at least 50% from baseline.
Time Frame
Cycle: 4, 7, 10, 13, 16, 19, 22, and 25
Title
Percentage of Participants Achieving 90 Percent Reduction From Baseline in Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA90 Response) at Week 12
Description
The PSA90 was defined as the percentage of participants who had a PSA decline of at least 90% from baseline.
Time Frame
Week 12
Title
Percentage of Participants Achieving PSA90 Response at Any Time During the Study
Description
The PSA90 was defined as the percentage of participants who had a PSA decline of at least 90% from baseline.
Time Frame
Cycle: 7, 10, 13, 16, 19, 22, and 25
Title
Best PSA Response at Any Time During the Study
Description
The PSA50 was defined as the percentage of participants who had a PSA decline of at least 50% from baseline. PSA90 was defined as the percentage of participants who had a PSA decline of at least 90% from baseline.
Time Frame
Cycle: 4, 7, 10, 13, 16, 19, 22, and 25
Title
Time to PSA Progression
Description
Time to PSA progression was defined as time from randomization to a PSA increase of 25% and PSA rise of at least 2 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) above the lowest value observed post baseline or, if no PSA decline occurred post baseline, above the baseline PSA.
Time Frame
Baseline until the final on treatment assessment or until end of short term follow-up following discontinuation of treatment, whichever occurred later (approximately up to 4.5 years)
Title
Number of Participants With Shifts From Baseline Between Favorable and Unfavorable Categories in Circulating Tumor Cell Count (CTC)
Description
A favorable CTC count was defined as less than (<) 5 counts per (/) 7.5 mililiter (mL) in whole blood. An unfavorable CTC count was defined as >=5 counts/7.5 mL in whole blood.
Time Frame
Baseline and EOT (Cycle 59 Day 58)
Title
Percentage of Participants With Objective Response
Description
Percentage of participants with objective response based assessment of confirmed complete response (CR) or confirmed partial response (PR) according to RECIST 1.1. The overall objective response was defined as a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR). A complete response (CR) was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions determined by computerized tomography (CT) or MRI. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have had reduction in short axis to <10 millimetre (mm). A PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of longest diameters of non-lymph node lesions and of the short diameter(s) or short axis of lymph nodes.
Time Frame
Baseline until disease progression or death, whichever occurred first (approximately up to 4.5 years)
Title
Time to Pain Progression
Description
Time to pain progression was defined as the time from participant randomization to the first assessment date of pain progression. Pain progression was defined as the occurrence of 1 of the following and confirmed by an additional assessment, at least 3 weeks but not more than 5 weeks later: The brief pain inventory-short form (BPI-SF) worst pain score was >= 4 with a >= 2 point increase over baseline in BPI-SF worst pain score with stable or increased analgesic use; The BPI-SF worst pain score was >= 4 but not less than baseline with new or increased (relative to baseline) Step II or Step III analgesic use; The BPI-SF worst pain score was <= 3 but not less than baseline with new or increased (relative to baseline) Step III analgesic use.
Time Frame
Baseline until EOT visit or until end of short term follow-up, whichever occurred later (approximately up to 4.5 years)
Title
Time to Pain Response
Description
Time to pain response was defined as the time from randomization until first pain response. Pain response was defined as the occurrence of 1 of the following and confirmed by an additional assessment, at least 3 weeks but not more than 5 weeks later: A >= 2 point reduction from baseline in BPI-SF worst pain score without an increase in analgesic use, or a 25% or more reduction in analgesic use from baseline without an increase in worst pain score from baseline. The analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier method.
Time Frame
Baseline until disease progression or death, whichever occurred first (approximately up to 4.5 years)
Title
Number of Participants With Best Pain Response
Description
Best pain response was evaluated in participants who had a pain response across the entire study were summarized by treatment group. The pain response was defined as a >=2-point reduction from baseline in BPI-SF worst pain score without an increase in analgesic use, or a 25% or more reduction in analgesic use from baseline without an increase in worst pain score from baseline.
Time Frame
Baseline until disease progression or death, whichever occurred first (approximately up to 4.5 years)
Title
Percentage of Participants With Health-related Quality of Life (HRQOL) Response at Week 12
Description
The global health status or quality of life (QOL) was measured as the HRQOL response rate at 12 weeks using the 2-item global health status index of the european organization for research and treatment of cancer-quality of life questionnaire-C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) instrument. HRQOL response was defined as a 17-point increase from the baseline assessment on the QOL index, after the score had been linearly transformed to a 0 to 100 scale. EORTC QLQ-C30: included 5 functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social), 1 global health status, 3 symptom scales (fatigue, pain, nausea/vomiting) and 6 single items (dyspnoea, appetite loss, insomnia, constipation/diarrhea and financial difficulties). Most questions used 4 point scale (1 'Not at all' to 4 'Very much'; 2 questions used 7-point scale (1 'very poor' to 7 'Excellent'). Scores averaged, transformed to 0-100 scale; higher score representing better level of functioning or greater degree of symptoms.
Time Frame
Week 12
10. Eligibility
Sex
Male
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Each participant must meet all of the following inclusion criteria:
Voluntary written consent
Male 18 years or older
Histologically or cytologically confirmed diagnosis of prostate adenocarcinoma
Radiograph-documented metastatic disease
Progressive disease
Prior surgical castration or concurrent use of an agent for medical castration
Progressive disease during or following 1 or 2 regimens of cytotoxic chemotherapy, 1 of which must have included docetaxel. Must have received greater than or equal to (>=) 360 milligram per square meter (mg/m^2) of docetaxel within a 6-month period. Participants who were clearly intolerant to docetaxel or develop progressive disease before receiving >= 360 mg/m^2 are also eligible if they have received at least 225 mg/m^2 of docetaxel within a 6-month period and meet the other study entry criteria.
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0 to 2
Even if surgically sterilized, participants must practice effective barrier contraception during the entire study treatment period and for 4 months after the last dose of study drug, OR Abstain from heterosexual intercourse
Screening laboratory values as specified in protocol
Stable medical condition
Life expectancy of 6 months or more
Participants who have had up to 2 prior chemotherapy treatments are eligible to participate
Exclusion Criteria:
Participants meeting any of the following exclusion criteria are not to be enrolled in the study:
Known hypersensitivity to orteronel, prednisone or gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogue
Received prior therapy with orteronel, aminoglutethimide, ketoconazole or abiraterone
Any other therapies for prostate cancer, except for GnRH analogue therapy, must be discontinued 2 weeks before the first dose of study drug
Radioisotope therapy or external beam radiation therapy within 4 weeks of first dose of study drug
Documented central nervous system metastases
Treatment with any investigational compound within 30 days prior to first dose of study drug (Participants who are in long-term follow-up following active treatment in other trials are eligible)
Diagnosis or treatment of another malignancy within 2 years preceding first dose of study drug except nonmelanoma skin cancer or in situ malignancy completely resected
Uncontrolled cardiovascular condition as specified in study protocol
Known history of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, hepatitis B, or hepatitis C
Unwilling or unable to comply with protocol
Known gastrointestinal disease or procedure that could interfere with oral absorption or tolerance of orteronel
Uncontrolled nausea, vomiting, or diarrhea despite appropriate medical therapy
Prostate cancer confined to just the prostrate bed or immediate adjacent tissue
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Medical Monitor
Organizational Affiliation
Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
City
Anchorage
State/Province
Alaska
ZIP/Postal Code
99508
Country
United States
City
Fort Smith
State/Province
Arkansas
ZIP/Postal Code
72903
Country
United States
City
Fountain Valley
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92708
Country
United States
City
Los Angeles
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
90025
Country
United States
City
Riverside
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92501
Country
United States
City
San Diego
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92120
Country
United States
City
Fort Myers
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33916
Country
United States
City
Port Saint Lucie
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
34952
Country
United States
City
Indianapolis
State/Province
Indiana
ZIP/Postal Code
46219
Country
United States
City
Jeffersonville
State/Province
Indiana
ZIP/Postal Code
47130
Country
United States
City
New Orleans
State/Province
Louisiana
ZIP/Postal Code
70112
Country
United States
City
Westminster
State/Province
Maryland
ZIP/Postal Code
21157
Country
United States
City
Detroit
State/Province
Michigan
ZIP/Postal Code
48201
Country
United States
City
Jefferson City
State/Province
Missouri
ZIP/Postal Code
65109
Country
United States
City
Las Vegas
State/Province
Nevada
ZIP/Postal Code
89169
Country
United States
City
Hackensack
State/Province
New Jersey
ZIP/Postal Code
07601
Country
United States
City
Albany
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
12208
Country
United States
City
East Syracuse
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
13057
Country
United States
City
Rochester
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
14623
Country
United States
City
Raleigh
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27607
Country
United States
City
Cincinnati
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
45230
Country
United States
City
Tualatin
State/Province
Oregon
ZIP/Postal Code
97062
Country
United States
City
Lancaster
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
17604
Country
United States
City
Pittsburgh
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
15212
Country
United States
City
Greenville
State/Province
South Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
29605
Country
United States
City
Chattanooga
State/Province
Tennessee
ZIP/Postal Code
37404
Country
United States
City
Nashville
State/Province
Tennessee
ZIP/Postal Code
37203
Country
United States
City
Amarillo
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
79106
Country
United States
City
Bedford
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
76022
Country
United States
City
Dallas
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
75231
Country
United States
City
Dallas
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
75246
Country
United States
City
Odessa
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
79761
Country
United States
City
Tyler
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
75702
Country
United States
City
Webster
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
77598
Country
United States
City
Salt Lake City
State/Province
Utah
Country
United States
City
Newport News
State/Province
Virginia
ZIP/Postal Code
23606
Country
United States
City
Kennewick
State/Province
Washington
ZIP/Postal Code
99336
Country
United States
City
Redcliffe
State/Province
Queensland
Country
Australia
City
Woodville South
State/Province
South Australia
ZIP/Postal Code
5011
Country
Australia
City
Hobart
State/Province
Tasmania
Country
Australia
City
Malvere
State/Province
Victoria
Country
Australia
City
Wodonga
State/Province
Victoria
Country
Australia
City
Brussels
Country
Belgium
City
Kortijk
Country
Belgium
City
Liege
Country
Belgium
City
Namur
Country
Belgium
City
Edmonton
State/Province
Alberta
Country
Canada
City
Kelowna
State/Province
British Columbia
ZIP/Postal Code
V1Y2H4
Country
Canada
City
Moncton
State/Province
New Brunswick
Country
Canada
City
Brampton
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
L6T4S5
Country
Canada
City
Newmarket
State/Province
Ontario
Country
Canada
City
Greenfield Park
State/Province
Quebec
ZIP/Postal Code
J4V2H3
Country
Canada
City
Montreal
State/Province
Quebec
Country
Canada
City
Pointe-Claire
State/Province
Quebec
ZIP/Postal Code
H9R4S3
Country
Canada
City
Hradec Dralove
Country
Czechia
City
Kromertz
Country
Czechia
City
Modrice
Country
Czechia
City
Praha
Country
Czechia
City
Zlin
Country
Czechia
City
Tallinn
Country
Estonia
City
Oulu
Country
Finland
City
Tampere
Country
Finland
City
La Roche-sur-Yon
Country
France
City
Le Mans
Country
France
City
Lyon Cedex
Country
France
City
Lyon
Country
France
City
Marseille
Country
France
City
Paris
Country
France
City
Villejuif cedex
ZIP/Postal Code
94805
Country
France
City
Patras
Country
Greece
City
Miskolc
Country
Hungary
City
Osztaly
Country
Hungary
City
Novara
Country
Italy
City
Rome
Country
Italy
City
Eindhoven
Country
Netherlands
City
Bielsko-Biala
Country
Poland
City
Goczalkowice-Zdroj
Country
Poland
City
Wroclaw
Country
Poland
City
Sevilla
Country
Spain
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
29272162
Citation
Heller G, McCormack R, Kheoh T, Molina A, Smith MR, Dreicer R, Saad F, de Wit R, Aftab DT, Hirmand M, Limon A, Fizazi K, Fleisher M, de Bono JS, Scher HI. Circulating Tumor Cell Number as a Response Measure of Prolonged Survival for Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: A Comparison With Prostate-Specific Antigen Across Five Randomized Phase III Clinical Trials. J Clin Oncol. 2018 Feb 20;36(6):572-580. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.75.2998. Epub 2017 Dec 22.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
26031410
Citation
Suri A, Chapel S, Lu C, Venkatakrishnan K. Physiologically based and population PK modeling in optimizing drug development: A predict-learn-confirm analysis. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2015 Sep;98(3):336-44. doi: 10.1002/cpt.155. Epub 2015 Jul 14.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
25624429
Citation
Fizazi K, Jones R, Oudard S, Efstathiou E, Saad F, de Wit R, De Bono J, Cruz FM, Fountzilas G, Ulys A, Carcano F, Agarwal N, Agus D, Bellmunt J, Petrylak DP, Lee SY, Webb IJ, Tejura B, Borgstein N, Dreicer R. Phase III, randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial comparing orteronel (TAK-700) plus prednisone with placebo plus prednisone in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer that has progressed during or after docetaxel-based therapy: ELM-PC 5. J Clin Oncol. 2015 Mar 1;33(7):723-31. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.56.5119. Epub 2015 Jan 26.
Results Reference
derived
Learn more about this trial
Study Comparing Orteronel Plus Prednisone in Participants With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs