Laparoscopic Surgery or Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery in Treating Patients With Rectal Cancer That Can Be Removed By Surgery
Primary Purpose
Recurrent Rectal Cancer, Stage I Rectal Cancer, Stage II Rectal Cancer
Status
Withdrawn
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
conventional laparoscopic surgery
robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery
quality-of-life assessment
questionnaire administration
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Recurrent Rectal Cancer
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion
- Able to provide written informed consent
- Diagnosis of rectal cancer amenable to curative surgery either by anterior resection or abdominoperineal resection (i.e. staged T1-3, N0-2, M0 by CT and MRI or transrectal ultrasound)
- Rectal cancer suitable for resection by either standard or robotic-assisted laparoscopic procedure
- Fit for robotic-assisted or standard laparoscopic rectal resection
- ASA =< 3
- Capable of completing required questionnaires at time of consent
Exclusion
- Benign lesions of the rectum
- Cancers of the anal canal
- Locally advanced cancers not amenable to curative surgery
- Locally advanced cancers requiring en bloc multi-visceral resection
- Synchronous colorectal tumours requiring multi-segment surgical resection
- Co-existent inflammatory bowel disease
- Clinical or radiological evidence of metastatic spread
- Concurrent or previous diagnosis of invasive cancer within 5 years that could confuse diagnosis (non-melanomatous skin cancer or superficial bladder cancer treated with curative intent are acceptable; for other cases please discuss with Chief Investigator via CTRU)
- History of psychiatric or addictive disorder or other medical condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, would preclude the patient from meeting the trial requirements
- Pregnancy
- Participation in another rectal cancer clinical trial relating to surgical technique
Sites / Locations
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Experimental
Arm Label
Arm I
Arm II
Arm Description
Patients undergo standard conventional laparoscopic resection.
Patients undergo robotic-assisted laparoscopic resection.
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Rate of conversion to open surgery as an indicator of surgical technical difficulty
Secondary Outcome Measures
Circumferential resection margin positivity rate
Local recurrence rate
Intra-operative and post-operative complications
Operative mortality
Self reported bladder and sexual function
Health related quality of life
Disease free and overall survival
Intra-operative laparoscopic skills (randomly selected cases only) as assessed by the global assessment tool for evaluation of intra-operative laparoscopic skills (GOALS)
Quality of the plane of surgery as assessed by central review of photographs
Health economics
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT01196000
First Posted
September 3, 2010
Last Updated
April 16, 2012
Sponsor
City of Hope Medical Center
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01196000
Brief Title
Laparoscopic Surgery or Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery in Treating Patients With Rectal Cancer That Can Be Removed By Surgery
Official Title
Laparoscopic Versus Robotic-Assisted Surgery for Rectal Cancer
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
April 2012
Overall Recruitment Status
Withdrawn
Why Stopped
The study has never been opened to accrual at COH. Study to be closed at COH due to the lack of qualified robotic colorectal surgeons.
Study Start Date
December 2011 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
July 2013 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
undefined (undefined)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
City of Hope Medical Center
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
RATIONALE: Robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery may be a less invasive type of surgery for rectal cancer and may have fewer side effects and improve recovery. It is not yet known whether robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery is more effective than laparoscopic surgery in treating patients with rectal cancer.
PURPOSE: This randomized clinical trial studies robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery to see how well it works compared to laparoscopic surgery in treating patients with rectal cancer that can be removed by surgery.
Detailed Description
OBJECTIVES:
I. To evaluate robotic-assisted rectal cancer surgery versus standard laparoscopic rectal cancer resection by means of a randomized, controlled trial.
II. To assess technical ease of the operation, as determined by the clinical indicator of low conversion rate to open operation.
III. To assess surgical accuracy and improved oncological outcome as determined by clear pathological resection margins.
IV. To assess quality of life and analyze cost-effectiveness to aid evidence-based knowledge to inform NHS and other service providers and decision-makers.
V. To analyze disease-free and overall survival and local recurrence rates at 3-year follow-up.
OUTLINE:
Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.
ARM I: Patients undergo standard laparoscopic resection.
ARM II: Patients undergo robotic-assisted laparoscopic resection.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up at 1 month, 6 months, and then annually thereafter for 3 years.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Recurrent Rectal Cancer, Stage I Rectal Cancer, Stage II Rectal Cancer, Stage III Rectal Cancer
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
0 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Arm I
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Patients undergo standard conventional laparoscopic resection.
Arm Title
Arm II
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Patients undergo robotic-assisted laparoscopic resection.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
conventional laparoscopic surgery
Other Intervention Name(s)
laparoscopy-assisted surgery, surgery, laparoscopic
Intervention Description
operation using conventional laparoscopic techniques
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery
Intervention Description
operation that involves use of laparoscopic assistance with robotic assistance
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
quality-of-life assessment
Other Intervention Name(s)
quality of life assessment
Intervention Description
Ancillary studies
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
questionnaire administration
Intervention Description
Ancillary studies
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Rate of conversion to open surgery as an indicator of surgical technical difficulty
Time Frame
At completion of surgery
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Circumferential resection margin positivity rate
Time Frame
At completion of pathology review
Title
Local recurrence rate
Time Frame
At 3 years
Title
Intra-operative and post-operative complications
Time Frame
At day 30 and 6 months
Title
Operative mortality
Time Frame
At day 30
Title
Self reported bladder and sexual function
Time Frame
At day 30 and 6 months
Title
Health related quality of life
Time Frame
At day 30 and 6 months
Title
Disease free and overall survival
Time Frame
At 3 years
Title
Intra-operative laparoscopic skills (randomly selected cases only) as assessed by the global assessment tool for evaluation of intra-operative laparoscopic skills (GOALS)
Time Frame
Upon completion of GOALS assessment by an independent expert
Title
Quality of the plane of surgery as assessed by central review of photographs
Time Frame
At completion of the central review of photographs
Title
Health economics
Time Frame
At day 30 and 6 months
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion
Able to provide written informed consent
Diagnosis of rectal cancer amenable to curative surgery either by anterior resection or abdominoperineal resection (i.e. staged T1-3, N0-2, M0 by CT and MRI or transrectal ultrasound)
Rectal cancer suitable for resection by either standard or robotic-assisted laparoscopic procedure
Fit for robotic-assisted or standard laparoscopic rectal resection
ASA =< 3
Capable of completing required questionnaires at time of consent
Exclusion
Benign lesions of the rectum
Cancers of the anal canal
Locally advanced cancers not amenable to curative surgery
Locally advanced cancers requiring en bloc multi-visceral resection
Synchronous colorectal tumours requiring multi-segment surgical resection
Co-existent inflammatory bowel disease
Clinical or radiological evidence of metastatic spread
Concurrent or previous diagnosis of invasive cancer within 5 years that could confuse diagnosis (non-melanomatous skin cancer or superficial bladder cancer treated with curative intent are acceptable; for other cases please discuss with Chief Investigator via CTRU)
History of psychiatric or addictive disorder or other medical condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, would preclude the patient from meeting the trial requirements
Pregnancy
Participation in another rectal cancer clinical trial relating to surgical technique
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Alessio Pigazzi
Organizational Affiliation
City of Hope Medical Center
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Learn more about this trial
Laparoscopic Surgery or Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery in Treating Patients With Rectal Cancer That Can Be Removed By Surgery
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs