search
Back to results

IRB-HSR# 13957: IV Lidocaine for Patients Undergoing Primary Breast Cancer Surgery:

Primary Purpose

Breast Cancer

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Placebo
Lidocaine
Sponsored by
University of Virginia
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional prevention trial for Breast Cancer focused on measuring Breast Cancer

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 80 Years (Adult, Older Adult)FemaleDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. informed consent
  2. age older than 18 to 80 years (inclusive)
  3. scheduled for mastectomy because of breast cancer
  4. American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical classification classes I - III

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Allergy to local anesthetics, fentanyl or morphine
  2. severe cardiovascular disease (myocardial infarction within 6 months), profoundly decreased left ventricular function (ejection fraction <40%) or high-grade arrhythmias
  3. severe liver disease (known AST or ALT or billirubin >2.5 times the upper limit of normal)
  4. renal impairment (creatinine clearance less than 60)
  5. pregnant or breast feeding
  6. patient is enrolled in another study or have been in one in the last 30 days

Sites / Locations

  • University of Virginia Health System

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Placebo Comparator

Experimental

Arm Label

Placebo

Lidocaine

Arm Description

ALL subjects will receive lidocaine up to 1.5mg/kg IV (in the vein) as a rapid injection. Then the continuous IV infusion of the study medication (containing lidocaine 8 mg/ml or placebo) will be started and will continue for up to two hours in the recovery room.

ALL subjects will receive lidocaine up to 1.5mg/kg IV (in the vein) as a rapid injection. Then the continuous IV infusion of the study medication (containing lidocaine 8 mg/ml or placebo) will be started and will continue for up to two hours in the recovery room.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

opiate consumption
We hypothesize that intraoperative use of intravenous lidocaine (as compared with placebo) will result in: decreased opiate consumption (primary endpoint), less pain, less fatigue and earlier postoperative discharge.

Secondary Outcome Measures

chronic pain
We hypothesize that patients receiving IV lidocaine will report less pain than those in the placebo group at 6 months following surgery.
cancer recurrence
We hypothesize that patients in the IV lidocaine group will have a lower rate of cancer recurrence than those in the placebo group at 5 years following surgery.

Full Information

First Posted
September 15, 2010
Last Updated
March 9, 2022
Sponsor
University of Virginia
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01204242
Brief Title
IRB-HSR# 13957: IV Lidocaine for Patients Undergoing Primary Breast Cancer Surgery:
Official Title
IRB-HSR# 13957: IV Lidocaine for Patients Undergoing Primary Breast Cancer Surgery: Effects on Postoperative Recovery and Cancer Recurrence
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
March 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
August 1, 2009 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
November 8, 2018 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
November 8, 2018 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
University of Virginia

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine whether a local anesthetic drug (lidocaine) given during anesthesia intravenously (IV) through a needle in your vein,), can: Help decrease pain after surgery. Have you need less pain medication. Have less side effects like nausea and vomiting following your surgery. Help to prevent chronic pain. Affect recurrence of cancer after surgery.
Detailed Description
Pain after breast surgery is usually treated with narcotics; however, these are associated with a high incidence of side effects such as itching, nausea and vomiting, constipation, urinary retention and dizziness. Another modality for pain control is regional anesthesia; thoracic paravertebral blocks [TPVB] using local anesthetics are particularly appealing for breast surgery. They provide good pain control, possibly blunting surgical stress response, and decrease the need for anesthetic agent. However, TPVB are not widely used, and the inherent risk associated with their placement, such as pneumothorax, nerve injury, bleeding and infection, makes them less appealing to patients. From a pain management point of view, paravertebral blocks may be the optimal approach for reducing pain and opiate consumption after breast cancer surgery. In addition, retrospective data suggest a reduction in cancer recurrence if this technique is used. Unfortunately, this effective technique is not widely performed because of the risk of pneumothorax and is only used in some centers. Our intent is to study an alternative approach with fewer risks. In this study, we will test the ability of intravenous lidocaine to provide pain relief after breast surgery. We base our hypothesis on a number of previous trials showing significant benefits of intravenous local anesthetics in the setting of abdominal surgery1-4. Approximately 30 to 50% of patients will develop chronic pain following mastectomy5,6. It has been suggested that adequately treating pain in the immediate perioperative period will prevent chronic pain. Specifically, application of EMLA (local anesthetic) cream perioperatively during breast surgery has been shown to reduce the incidence of chronic pain development7. Perioperative administration of intravenous lidocaine may offer similar benefits. Therefore, we will study the incidence of chronic pain in our population after 6 months. Finally, anesthetic choice during primary surgical intervention for cancer may affect recurrence and metastasis. A recent retrospective study suggests a profound reduction in recurrence in breast cancer patients receiving regional + general anesthesia as compared with general alone9. Similar data have been published in abstract form regarding recurrence after prostate surgery10. Also, Christopherson et al studied the long-term survival of 177 patients after resection of colon cancer in a trial of general anesthesia with and without epidural anesthesia and analgesia supplementation for resection of colon cancer. Epidural supplementation was associated with enhanced survival among patients without metastases before 1.46 years8. Although the mechanisms of this beneficial effect are unclear, attenuation of the surgical stress response, modulation of the inflammatory system, and/or decreased requirement for volatile anesthetics and opiates by regional anesthesia are possible mechanisms11. For example, the neural inputs activated during surgical stress may result in activation of promalignant pathways. Morphine has been shown to promote angiogenesis in a model of breast cancer, a key step in tumor development12. In addition, opiates interfere with natural killer cell function13. It is conceivable that the beneficial effect on recurrence might derive from low systemic level of local anesthetics attained during regional anesthesia. A number of studies have demonstrated significant reduction in opiate requirements and a decrease in the magnitude of stress response when local anesthetics are used intravenously1,3,4. If so, systemic administration would be a safer and a simpler way to reach the same goal. We therefore will compare the effect of local anesthetics given intravenously as compared with placebo on cancer recurrence rate.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Breast Cancer
Keywords
Breast Cancer

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Prevention
Study Phase
Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
78 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Placebo
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
ALL subjects will receive lidocaine up to 1.5mg/kg IV (in the vein) as a rapid injection. Then the continuous IV infusion of the study medication (containing lidocaine 8 mg/ml or placebo) will be started and will continue for up to two hours in the recovery room.
Arm Title
Lidocaine
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
ALL subjects will receive lidocaine up to 1.5mg/kg IV (in the vein) as a rapid injection. Then the continuous IV infusion of the study medication (containing lidocaine 8 mg/ml or placebo) will be started and will continue for up to two hours in the recovery room.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Placebo
Other Intervention Name(s)
xylocaine
Intervention Description
ALL subjects will receive lidocaine up to 1.5mg/kg IV (in the vein) as a rapid injection. Then the continuous IV infusion of the study medication (containing lidocaine 8 mg/ml or placebo) will be started and will continue for up to two hours in the recovery room.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Lidocaine
Other Intervention Name(s)
xylocaine
Intervention Description
ALL subjects will receive lidocaine up to 1.5mg/kg IV (in the vein) as a rapid injection. Then the continuous IV infusion of the study medication (containing lidocaine 8 mg/ml or placebo) will be started and will continue for up to two hours in the recovery room.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
opiate consumption
Description
We hypothesize that intraoperative use of intravenous lidocaine (as compared with placebo) will result in: decreased opiate consumption (primary endpoint), less pain, less fatigue and earlier postoperative discharge.
Time Frame
hospital discharge/ days 0-7
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
chronic pain
Description
We hypothesize that patients receiving IV lidocaine will report less pain than those in the placebo group at 6 months following surgery.
Time Frame
6 months after surgery
Title
cancer recurrence
Description
We hypothesize that patients in the IV lidocaine group will have a lower rate of cancer recurrence than those in the placebo group at 5 years following surgery.
Time Frame
yearly for 5 years after surgery

10. Eligibility

Sex
Female
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
80 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: informed consent age older than 18 to 80 years (inclusive) scheduled for mastectomy because of breast cancer American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical classification classes I - III Exclusion Criteria: Allergy to local anesthetics, fentanyl or morphine severe cardiovascular disease (myocardial infarction within 6 months), profoundly decreased left ventricular function (ejection fraction <40%) or high-grade arrhythmias severe liver disease (known AST or ALT or billirubin >2.5 times the upper limit of normal) renal impairment (creatinine clearance less than 60) pregnant or breast feeding patient is enrolled in another study or have been in one in the last 30 days
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Mohammed Tiouririne, MD
Organizational Affiliation
UVA Dept of Anesthesiology
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University of Virginia Health System
City
Charlottesville
State/Province
Virginia
ZIP/Postal Code
22908
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
17197840
Citation
Kaba A, Laurent SR, Detroz BJ, Sessler DI, Durieux ME, Lamy ML, Joris JL. Intravenous lidocaine infusion facilitates acute rehabilitation after laparoscopic colectomy. Anesthesiology. 2007 Jan;106(1):11-8; discussion 5-6. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200701000-00007.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17667496
Citation
Herroeder S, Pecher S, Schonherr ME, Kaulitz G, Hahnenkamp K, Friess H, Bottiger BW, Bauer H, Dijkgraaf MG, Durieux ME, Hollmann MW. Systemic lidocaine shortens length of hospital stay after colorectal surgery: a double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Ann Surg. 2007 Aug;246(2):192-200. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31805dac11. Erratum In: Ann Surg. 2009 Apr;249(4):701. Dijkgraaf, Omarcel G W [corrected to Dijkgraaf, Marcel G W].
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
9459225
Citation
Groudine SB, Fisher HA, Kaufman RP Jr, Patel MK, Wilkins LJ, Mehta SA, Lumb PD. Intravenous lidocaine speeds the return of bowel function, decreases postoperative pain, and shortens hospital stay in patients undergoing radical retropubic prostatectomy. Anesth Analg. 1998 Feb;86(2):235-9. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199802000-00003.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
3898920
Citation
Cassuto J, Wallin G, Hogstrom S, Faxen A, Rimback G. Inhibition of postoperative pain by continuous low-dose intravenous infusion of lidocaine. Anesth Analg. 1985 Oct;64(10):971-4.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
8880841
Citation
Wallace MS, Wallace AM, Lee J, Dobke MK. Pain after breast surgery: a survey of 282 women. Pain. 1996 Aug;66(2-3):195-205. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(96)03064-3.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
12855309
Citation
Jung BF, Ahrendt GM, Oaklander AL, Dworkin RH. Neuropathic pain following breast cancer surgery: proposed classification and research update. Pain. 2003 Jul;104(1-2):1-13. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3959(03)00241-0. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
10925929
Citation
Fassoulaki A, Sarantopoulos C, Melemeni A, Hogan Q. EMLA reduces acute and chronic pain after breast surgery for cancer. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2000 Jul-Aug;25(4):350-5. doi: 10.1053/rapm.2000.7812. Erratum In: Reg Anesth Pain Med 2002 Jan-Feb;27(1):116.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
18635504
Citation
Christopherson R, James KE, Tableman M, Marshall P, Johnson FE. Long-term survival after colon cancer surgery: a variation associated with choice of anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 2008 Jul;107(1):325-32. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e3181770f55.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17006061
Citation
Exadaktylos AK, Buggy DJ, Moriarty DC, Mascha E, Sessler DI. Can anesthetic technique for primary breast cancer surgery affect recurrence or metastasis? Anesthesiology. 2006 Oct;105(4):660-4. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200610000-00008.
Results Reference
background
Citation
Biki B MD, Sessler DI, Mascha E, Buggy DJ: Can Anaesthetic Technique for Radical Prostatectomy Surgery Affect Recurrence or Metastasis?, ASA Annual Meeting American Society of Anesthesiologists. San Francisco, 2007
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
10074922
Citation
Ben-Eliyahu S, Page GG, Yirmiya R, Shakhar G. Evidence that stress and surgical interventions promote tumor development by suppressing natural killer cell activity. Int J Cancer. 1999 Mar 15;80(6):880-8. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0215(19990315)80:63.0.co;2-y.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17971769
Citation
Farooqui M, Li Y, Rogers T, Poonawala T, Griffin RJ, Song CW, Gupta K. COX-2 inhibitor celecoxib prevents chronic morphine-induced promotion of angiogenesis, tumour growth, metastasis and mortality, without compromising analgesia. Br J Cancer. 2007 Dec 3;97(11):1523-31. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604057. Epub 2007 Oct 30.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
9610671
Citation
Eisenstein TK, Hilburger ME. Opioid modulation of immune responses: effects on phagocyte and lymphoid cell populations. J Neuroimmunol. 1998 Mar 15;83(1-2):36-44. doi: 10.1016/s0165-5728(97)00219-1.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15190136
Citation
Apfel CC, Korttila K, Abdalla M, Kerger H, Turan A, Vedder I, Zernak C, Danner K, Jokela R, Pocock SJ, Trenkler S, Kredel M, Biedler A, Sessler DI, Roewer N; IMPACT Investigators. A factorial trial of six interventions for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting. N Engl J Med. 2004 Jun 10;350(24):2441-51. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa032196.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25275577
Citation
Terkawi AS, Durieux ME, Gottschalk A, Brenin D, Tiouririne M. Effect of intravenous lidocaine on postoperative recovery of patients undergoing mastectomy: a double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2014 Nov-Dec;39(6):472-7. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000140.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

IRB-HSR# 13957: IV Lidocaine for Patients Undergoing Primary Breast Cancer Surgery:

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs