Feasibility Study to Evaluate Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) Settings for the Treatment of Parkinson's Disease (SAGE)
Primary Purpose
Parkinson's Disease
Status
Withdrawn
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
GUIDE software, Version 0.1
Clinically defined stimulation parameters
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional supportive care trial for Parkinson's Disease focused on measuring Deep Brain Stimulation, DBS, Parkinson's disease, PD, Patients who have a preexisting Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) system for the treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD)
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patient is able and willing to provide informed consent to participate in the study.
- The patient's implanted DBS system shall be the Medtronic, Inc. Activa® System. The Medtronic Activa System may consists of either, Soletra®, Kinetra® Activa® RC, or Activa® PC Neurostimulator(s) and two DBS Leads (Model 3387 or 3389).
- Patient shall have bilateral DBS of the subthalamic nucleolus (STN).
- Patient shall have stable DBS stimulation without changes in stimulation parameters for no less than 3 months prior to enrollment.
- Patient shall have stable and optimal regimen of antiparkinson drug therapy for no less than 3 months prior to enrollment.
- Patient, and caregiver if applicable, is able and willing to be available for study visits throughout the duration of the study (e.g. no planned relocation of residence or extended vacation during the study that would prevent compliance with study visit schedule).
- Availability, from the patient's medical records, of a Pre-op MRI and high resolution CT with artifact reduction no less than six (6) weeks post-op.
- Patient shall have Hoehn and Yahr stage III or worse when off stimulation and off medication.
- Patient shall have demonstrated good response to L-DOPA, defined as no less than a 30% improvement in a UPDRS-III motor exam following the administration of L-DOPA during their screening neurological exam.
- Patient shall have demonstrated good response to DBS following the administration of DBS while off medication, defined as an improvement in UPDRS-III motor scores better than their improvement to L-DOPA (as determine in above) or no less than 20% worse of an improvement.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Evidence of secondary or atypical Parkinsonism as suggested by: stroke, encephalitis, exposure to toxins, neuroleptic antipsychotics, neurologic signs of upper motor neuron or cerebellar involvement, or supranuclear palsy.
- Dementia as evidenced by a mini-mental state examination of 24 or below (MMSE ≥ 24).
- Prior participation in the Intelect Medical GUIDE study.
Sites / Locations
- University of Florida
- North Shore University Hospital
- Evergreen Healthcare
- Medical College of Wisconsin
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Experimental
Arm Label
Clinical
Model
Arm Description
Stimulation settings predetermined clinically (Clinical)
stimulation settings derived from a patient-specific computer-based model (Model)
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
sustained improvement in working memory
The primary endpoint of this study is to determine whether or not sustained improvement in working memory can be obtained during DBS with stimulation settings derived from a patient-specific computer-based model (Model) as compared with stimulation settings predetermined clinically (Clinical).
Secondary Outcome Measures
Quality of Life (QOL)improvements
The secondary endpoints will evaluate whether or not sustained cognitive improvements translate into other aspects of the patient's life (e.g. mood, activities of daily living, apathy, etc.) during DBS with stimulation settings derived from a patient-specific computer-based model (Model) as compared with stimulation settings predetermined clinically (Clinical).
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT01230151
First Posted
October 27, 2010
Last Updated
February 17, 2011
Sponsor
Intelect Medical, Inc.
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01230151
Brief Title
Feasibility Study to Evaluate Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) Settings for the Treatment of Parkinson's Disease
Acronym
SAGE
Official Title
Sustained Affect of GUIDE (SAGE):A Software Evaluation Study
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
February 2011
Overall Recruitment Status
Withdrawn
Why Stopped
Sponsor (Intelect Medical, Inc.) was acquired by Boston Scientific and study was canceled.
Study Start Date
December 2010 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
December 2011 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
undefined (undefined)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Name of the Sponsor
Intelect Medical, Inc.
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to assess the cognitive performance in patients with advanced Parkinson's disease receiving Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) with settings predetermined clinically to settings derived from a patient-specific computational model.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Parkinson's Disease
Keywords
Deep Brain Stimulation, DBS, Parkinson's disease, PD, Patients who have a preexisting Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) system for the treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD)
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Supportive Care
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Crossover Assignment
Masking
ParticipantInvestigator
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
80 (Anticipated)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Clinical
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Stimulation settings predetermined clinically (Clinical)
Arm Title
Model
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
stimulation settings derived from a patient-specific computer-based model (Model)
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
GUIDE software, Version 0.1
Intervention Description
The GUIDE software uses computer-based models to determine the spread of stimulation from DBS therapy into surrounding nuclei of the brain. The software models stimulation and is not used to program or communicate with the patient's implanted DBS System. The software was recently validated in a multi-center clinical study.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Clinically defined stimulation parameters
Intervention Description
Stimulation parameters clinically determined prior to start of clinical study
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
sustained improvement in working memory
Description
The primary endpoint of this study is to determine whether or not sustained improvement in working memory can be obtained during DBS with stimulation settings derived from a patient-specific computer-based model (Model) as compared with stimulation settings predetermined clinically (Clinical).
Time Frame
2 Months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Quality of Life (QOL)improvements
Description
The secondary endpoints will evaluate whether or not sustained cognitive improvements translate into other aspects of the patient's life (e.g. mood, activities of daily living, apathy, etc.) during DBS with stimulation settings derived from a patient-specific computer-based model (Model) as compared with stimulation settings predetermined clinically (Clinical).
Time Frame
2 Months
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Patient is able and willing to provide informed consent to participate in the study.
The patient's implanted DBS system shall be the Medtronic, Inc. Activa® System. The Medtronic Activa System may consists of either, Soletra®, Kinetra® Activa® RC, or Activa® PC Neurostimulator(s) and two DBS Leads (Model 3387 or 3389).
Patient shall have bilateral DBS of the subthalamic nucleolus (STN).
Patient shall have stable DBS stimulation without changes in stimulation parameters for no less than 3 months prior to enrollment.
Patient shall have stable and optimal regimen of antiparkinson drug therapy for no less than 3 months prior to enrollment.
Patient, and caregiver if applicable, is able and willing to be available for study visits throughout the duration of the study (e.g. no planned relocation of residence or extended vacation during the study that would prevent compliance with study visit schedule).
Availability, from the patient's medical records, of a Pre-op MRI and high resolution CT with artifact reduction no less than six (6) weeks post-op.
Patient shall have Hoehn and Yahr stage III or worse when off stimulation and off medication.
Patient shall have demonstrated good response to L-DOPA, defined as no less than a 30% improvement in a UPDRS-III motor exam following the administration of L-DOPA during their screening neurological exam.
Patient shall have demonstrated good response to DBS following the administration of DBS while off medication, defined as an improvement in UPDRS-III motor scores better than their improvement to L-DOPA (as determine in above) or no less than 20% worse of an improvement.
Exclusion Criteria:
Evidence of secondary or atypical Parkinsonism as suggested by: stroke, encephalitis, exposure to toxins, neuroleptic antipsychotics, neurologic signs of upper motor neuron or cerebellar involvement, or supranuclear palsy.
Dementia as evidenced by a mini-mental state examination of 24 or below (MMSE ≥ 24).
Prior participation in the Intelect Medical GUIDE study.
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University of Florida
City
Gainesville
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
32610
Country
United States
Facility Name
North Shore University Hospital
City
Manhasset
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
11030
Country
United States
Facility Name
Evergreen Healthcare
City
Kirkland
State/Province
Washington
ZIP/Postal Code
98034
Country
United States
Facility Name
Medical College of Wisconsin
City
Milwaukee
State/Province
Wisconsin
ZIP/Postal Code
53226
Country
United States
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
20061324
Citation
Frankemolle AM, Wu J, Noecker AM, Voelcker-Rehage C, Ho JC, Vitek JL, McIntyre CC, Alberts JL. Reversing cognitive-motor impairments in Parkinson's disease patients using a computational modelling approach to deep brain stimulation programming. Brain. 2010 Mar;133(Pt 3):746-61. doi: 10.1093/brain/awp315. Epub 2010 Jan 7.
Results Reference
background
Learn more about this trial
Feasibility Study to Evaluate Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) Settings for the Treatment of Parkinson's Disease
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs