search
Back to results

Care Management for the Effective Use of Opioids (CAMEO)

Primary Purpose

Low Back Pain, Pain

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Pharmacological (MED)
Behavioral treatment (CBT)
Sponsored by
VA Office of Research and Development
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Low Back Pain focused on measuring Back pain, Care Management, Pain, Patient outcomes, Patient-center Care, Primary care

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

Veterans will be eligible if they have:

  • chronic lower back pain of at least moderate intensity
  • pain for 6 months
  • on chronic opioid therapy
  • and access to a working telephone

Exclusion Criteria:

Exclusion criteria includes:

  • severe medical conditions
  • active psychosis
  • schizophrenia
  • active suicidal ideation
  • pending back surgery
  • moderately severe cognitive impairment
  • involvement in ongoing pain trials
  • and pregnant or trying to become pregnant

The investigators will exclude Veterans with an active substance use disorder (i.e., those currently in treatment), but to maximize generalizability the investigators will not exclude those with a past history of substance abuse.

Sites / Locations

  • Richard L. Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Experimental

Arm Label

Arm 1: Pharmacological (MED)

Arm 2: Behavioral treatment (CBT)

Arm Description

Subjects in the Pharmacological (MED) arm will receive at least 8 contacts with the nurse care managers (NCM) over the trial period. Participants will have an initial visit at baseline to assess their current and past treatments for chronic lower back pain, pain intensity, and pain-related limitations. Patients' opioids will be adjusted and/or co-analgesics (or adjuvants) will be initiated. During follow-up calls, patients' pain severity, response to treatment, adherence, adverse effects, and desire to change current treatment will be assessed. Follow-up NCM telephone contacts will occur at 2 and 4 weeks after baseline, and months 2, 3, 4, 6, and 9 months. On average, these calls last between 10 to 20 minutes. Detailed logs will be kept of the timing and content of patient contacts.

Veterans randomized to behavioral treatment arm (CBT) will receive a series of 8 pain self-management/coping skills training sessions delivered by one of three primary-care based clinical psychologists. Since optimal application of non-pharmacological interventions for pain involves tailoring to patient needs, participants will be introduced to a menu of self-management and coping skills rather than receive a prescribed program. Delivery of the behavioral intervention will employ a flexible approach that is easily adapted to individual preferences and perceived need for learning specific pain coping skills. Tailoring will include the selection of relevant content and skills and assessment of readiness to change behaviors.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Brief Pain Inventory Total Score at Baseline and Change Score From Baseline at 3, 6, 9, and 12 Months
The Brief Pain Inventory Total Score combines scores from the BPI Pain Intensity subscale and the BPI Pain Interference subscale. This scale provides a total score from 0 (no pain/no pain interference) to 10 (worst pain imaginable/completely interferes). We report below the baseline score on the 0 to 10 scale. At each follow-up time point (3, 6, 9, and 12 months) we report the change from baseline to follow-up. This value was calculated as the baseline score minus the follow-up score.
Brief Pain Inventory Pain Intensity Score at Baseline and Each Follow-up Time Point
The Brief Pain Inventory pain intensity score is scored from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable). We report below the baseline score on the 0 to 10 scale. At each follow-up time point (3, 6, 9, and 12 months) we report the change from baseline to follow-up. This value was calculated as the baseline score minus the follow-up score.
Brief Pain Inventory Pain Interference Scale Score
The Brief Pain Inventory Pain Interference Scale score assesses if pain interferes with 7 common activities. This scale is score 0 (no interference) to 10 (high interference). The 7-items are averaged to give a score.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Pain Catastrophizing Scale
The Pain Catastrophizing Scale a 13-item scale that assesses catastrophizing - a pain belief that have been found to be strong predictor of poor treatment response. It is scored from 0 (no catastrophizing) to 52 (severe catastrophizing)
Roland Morris Disability Scale
The Roland Morris Disability Scale is a 24-item pain-specific measure of physical disability. It provides a score from 0 (no disability) to 24 (high disability)
Patient Health Questionnaire-9
The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 is used to assess depression severity. It's 9-items that are scored from 0 (no depression) to 27 (severe depression)
Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item (GAD-7) Scale
The GAD-7 is a measure of anxiety. The GAD-7 consists of 7 items that are scored from 0 (no anxiety) to 21 (severe anxiety)
AUDIT-C
The AUDIT-C is validated as an effective screening test and diagnostic tool for alcohol misuse in primary care samples. It is scored on 0 to 10 score with higher scores representing alcohol misuse
Current Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM)
The COMM (Current Opioid Misuse Measure) is a 17-item instrument designed to monitor misuse and aberrant behaviors in patients prescribed opioids. The scale is scored from 0 (no evidence of opioid misuse or aberrant behaviors) to 64 (strong evidence for opioid misuse and aberrant behaviors)
SF-36 General Health Perception
The SF-36 is a subscale that assesses the self-reported general health. It is scored on a 0 to 100 scale with higher scores representing greater perceived general health
SF-36 Vitality Scale
The SF-36 vital score is a subscale that assesses participants' vitality/energy. It is scored on a 0 to 100 scale with higher scores representing greater vitality/energy.
SF-36 Social Functioning Scale
The SF-36 social functioning scale is a subscale that assesses the self-reported social functioning. It is scored on a 0 to 100 scale with higher scores representing better social functioning.

Full Information

First Posted
November 5, 2010
Last Updated
July 19, 2023
Sponsor
VA Office of Research and Development
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01236521
Brief Title
Care Management for the Effective Use of Opioids
Acronym
CAMEO
Official Title
Care Management for the Effective Use of Opioids (CAMEO)
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
July 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
December 1, 2011 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
December 11, 2015 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
December 31, 2015 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
VA Office of Research and Development

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The CAre Management for the Effective use of Opioids (CAMEO) trial is a 2-arm randomized clinical trial to compare the effectiveness of pharmacological vs. behavioral approaches for chronic lower back pain. The study aims are to compare the interventions' (PHARM vs. BEH) effects on pain intensity, pain interference, function, and other pain relevant outcomes over 12 months.
Detailed Description
The general purpose of the CAre Management for the Effective use of Opioids (CAMEO) study is to develop, test, and implement novel treatments and care delivery models that address barriers to effective pain management and that can be practicably applied in VA primary care settings for chronic low back pain (CLBP). The CAMEO trial is a 2-arm randomized clinical trial to compare the effectiveness of pharmacological vs. behavioral approaches for CLBP. The investigators' study sample will target 272 Veterans with moderate to severe CLBP despite long-term opioid therapy. Patients from five primary care clinics at the Roudebush VA Medical Center and two community based outpatient clinics will be recruited to participate in CAMEO and randomized to one of two treatment arms. The pharmacological arm will involve guideline-concordant opioid management coupled with algorithm-based co-analgesic treatment (MED). Patients in the behavioral arm (CBT) will receive pain self-management/coping skills training. The trial will last 12-months and all participants will undergo comprehensive outcome assessments at baseline, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. Study Aims: Among Veterans with chronic low back pain refractory to long-term opioid therapy To compare the interventions' (MED vs. CBT) effects on pain intensity and function over 12 months To compare the interventions' effects (MED vs. CBT) on other relevant outcomes Health-related quality of life Pain Catastrophizing Depression Anxiety Disability Opioid misuse and opioid dose

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Low Back Pain, Pain
Keywords
Back pain, Care Management, Pain, Patient outcomes, Patient-center Care, Primary care

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Outcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
261 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Arm 1: Pharmacological (MED)
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Subjects in the Pharmacological (MED) arm will receive at least 8 contacts with the nurse care managers (NCM) over the trial period. Participants will have an initial visit at baseline to assess their current and past treatments for chronic lower back pain, pain intensity, and pain-related limitations. Patients' opioids will be adjusted and/or co-analgesics (or adjuvants) will be initiated. During follow-up calls, patients' pain severity, response to treatment, adherence, adverse effects, and desire to change current treatment will be assessed. Follow-up NCM telephone contacts will occur at 2 and 4 weeks after baseline, and months 2, 3, 4, 6, and 9 months. On average, these calls last between 10 to 20 minutes. Detailed logs will be kept of the timing and content of patient contacts.
Arm Title
Arm 2: Behavioral treatment (CBT)
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Veterans randomized to behavioral treatment arm (CBT) will receive a series of 8 pain self-management/coping skills training sessions delivered by one of three primary-care based clinical psychologists. Since optimal application of non-pharmacological interventions for pain involves tailoring to patient needs, participants will be introduced to a menu of self-management and coping skills rather than receive a prescribed program. Delivery of the behavioral intervention will employ a flexible approach that is easily adapted to individual preferences and perceived need for learning specific pain coping skills. Tailoring will include the selection of relevant content and skills and assessment of readiness to change behaviors.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Pharmacological (MED)
Other Intervention Name(s)
Co-analgesic algorithm
Intervention Description
During the baseline assessment, the nurse care managers will determine current and past treatments for chronic lower back pain and establish whether or not patients have had an adequate trial (i.e., were analgesics sufficiently dosed). If not, the nurse care manager in conjunction with study doctors will recommend an adjustment of the patients' opioid or initiate treatment with a co-analgesic with appropriate dosing and scheduling. The Patients in the MED arm will be asked to sign an opioid treatment agreement at enrollment.
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Behavioral treatment (CBT)
Other Intervention Name(s)
Pain self-management/coping skills treatment
Intervention Description
There will be 8 sessions of pain self-management and coping skills.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Brief Pain Inventory Total Score at Baseline and Change Score From Baseline at 3, 6, 9, and 12 Months
Description
The Brief Pain Inventory Total Score combines scores from the BPI Pain Intensity subscale and the BPI Pain Interference subscale. This scale provides a total score from 0 (no pain/no pain interference) to 10 (worst pain imaginable/completely interferes). We report below the baseline score on the 0 to 10 scale. At each follow-up time point (3, 6, 9, and 12 months) we report the change from baseline to follow-up. This value was calculated as the baseline score minus the follow-up score.
Time Frame
Baseline and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months
Title
Brief Pain Inventory Pain Intensity Score at Baseline and Each Follow-up Time Point
Description
The Brief Pain Inventory pain intensity score is scored from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable). We report below the baseline score on the 0 to 10 scale. At each follow-up time point (3, 6, 9, and 12 months) we report the change from baseline to follow-up. This value was calculated as the baseline score minus the follow-up score.
Time Frame
Baseline and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months
Title
Brief Pain Inventory Pain Interference Scale Score
Description
The Brief Pain Inventory Pain Interference Scale score assesses if pain interferes with 7 common activities. This scale is score 0 (no interference) to 10 (high interference). The 7-items are averaged to give a score.
Time Frame
Baseline and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Pain Catastrophizing Scale
Description
The Pain Catastrophizing Scale a 13-item scale that assesses catastrophizing - a pain belief that have been found to be strong predictor of poor treatment response. It is scored from 0 (no catastrophizing) to 52 (severe catastrophizing)
Time Frame
Baseline, 6 months, and 12 months
Title
Roland Morris Disability Scale
Description
The Roland Morris Disability Scale is a 24-item pain-specific measure of physical disability. It provides a score from 0 (no disability) to 24 (high disability)
Time Frame
Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, and 12 months
Title
Patient Health Questionnaire-9
Description
The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 is used to assess depression severity. It's 9-items that are scored from 0 (no depression) to 27 (severe depression)
Time Frame
Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, and 12 months
Title
Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item (GAD-7) Scale
Description
The GAD-7 is a measure of anxiety. The GAD-7 consists of 7 items that are scored from 0 (no anxiety) to 21 (severe anxiety)
Time Frame
Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, and 12 months
Title
AUDIT-C
Description
The AUDIT-C is validated as an effective screening test and diagnostic tool for alcohol misuse in primary care samples. It is scored on 0 to 10 score with higher scores representing alcohol misuse
Time Frame
Baseline, 6 months, and 12 months
Title
Current Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM)
Description
The COMM (Current Opioid Misuse Measure) is a 17-item instrument designed to monitor misuse and aberrant behaviors in patients prescribed opioids. The scale is scored from 0 (no evidence of opioid misuse or aberrant behaviors) to 64 (strong evidence for opioid misuse and aberrant behaviors)
Time Frame
Baseline, 6 months, and 12 months
Title
SF-36 General Health Perception
Description
The SF-36 is a subscale that assesses the self-reported general health. It is scored on a 0 to 100 scale with higher scores representing greater perceived general health
Time Frame
Baseline, 6 months, and 12 months
Title
SF-36 Vitality Scale
Description
The SF-36 vital score is a subscale that assesses participants' vitality/energy. It is scored on a 0 to 100 scale with higher scores representing greater vitality/energy.
Time Frame
Baseline, 6 months, and 12 months
Title
SF-36 Social Functioning Scale
Description
The SF-36 social functioning scale is a subscale that assesses the self-reported social functioning. It is scored on a 0 to 100 scale with higher scores representing better social functioning.
Time Frame
Baseline, 6 months, and 12 months

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Veterans will be eligible if they have: chronic lower back pain of at least moderate intensity pain for 6 months on chronic opioid therapy and access to a working telephone Exclusion Criteria: Exclusion criteria includes: severe medical conditions active psychosis schizophrenia active suicidal ideation pending back surgery moderately severe cognitive impairment involvement in ongoing pain trials and pregnant or trying to become pregnant The investigators will exclude Veterans with an active substance use disorder (i.e., those currently in treatment), but to maximize generalizability the investigators will not exclude those with a past history of substance abuse.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Matthew J. Bair, MD MS
Organizational Affiliation
Richard L. Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Richard L. Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN
City
Indianapolis
State/Province
Indiana
ZIP/Postal Code
46202-2884
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
IPD Sharing Plan Description
Upon request, we will share data with other researchers
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
29200181
Citation
Chen CX, Kroenke K, Stump TE, Kean J, Carpenter JS, Krebs EE, Bair MJ, Damush TM, Monahan PO. Estimating minimally important differences for the PROMIS pain interference scales: results from 3 randomized clinical trials. Pain. 2018 Apr;159(4):775-782. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001121.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
30529442
Citation
Chen CX, Kroenke K, Stump T, Kean J, Krebs EE, Bair MJ, Damush T, Monahan PO. Comparative Responsiveness of the PROMIS Pain Interference Short Forms With Legacy Pain Measures: Results From Three Randomized Clinical Trials. J Pain. 2019 Jun;20(6):664-675. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2018.11.010. Epub 2018 Dec 6.
Results Reference
result
Citation
Bair MJ, Outcalt SD, Slaven JE, Kroenke K, Kempf C, Zillich AJ, Damush TM, Saha C, French DD, Krebs EE. Care Management for the Effective Use of Opioids (CAMEO): A Randomized Trial. Abstracts of the 77th Annual Scientific Meeting, March 6-9, 2019. Vancouver, BC, Canada. Abstract 1734. [Abstract]. Psychosomatic medicine. 2019 May 1; 81(4):A-149.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
32056864
Citation
Kroenke K, Stump TE, Chen CX, Kean J, Bair MJ, Damush TM, Krebs EE, Monahan PO. Minimally important differences and severity thresholds are estimated for the PROMIS depression scales from three randomized clinical trials. J Affect Disord. 2020 Apr 1;266:100-108. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.01.101. Epub 2020 Jan 23.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
33541362
Citation
Kroenke K, Stump TE, Chen CX, Kean J, Damush TM, Bair MJ, Krebs EE, Monahan PO. Responsiveness of PROMIS and Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ) Depression Scales in three clinical trials. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2021 Feb 4;19(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s12955-021-01674-3.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
34052655
Citation
Kroenke K, Stump TE, Kean J, Krebs EE, Damush TM, Bair MJ, Monahan PO. Diagnostic operating characteristics of PROMIS scales in screening for depression. J Psychosom Res. 2021 Aug;147:110532. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2021.110532. Epub 2021 May 25.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
34048943
Citation
Bushey MA, Slaven J, Outcalt SD, Kroenke K, Kempf C, Froman A, Sargent C, Baecher B, Zillich A, Damush TM, Saha C, French DD, Bair MJ. Design and methods of the Care Management for the Effective Use of Opioids (CAMEO) trial. Contemp Clin Trials. 2021 Jul;106:106456. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2021.106456. Epub 2021 May 25.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
36394874
Citation
Bushey MA, Slaven JE, Outcalt SD, Kroenke K, Kempf C, Froman A, Sargent C, Baecher B, Zillich AJ, Damush TM, Saha C, French DD, Bair MJ. Effect of Medication Optimization vs Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Among US Veterans With Chronic Low Back Pain Receiving Long-term Opioid Therapy: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Nov 1;5(11):e2242533. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.42533.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
24073098
Citation
Midboe AM, Lewis ET, Paik MC, Gallagher RM, Rosenberg JM, Goodman F, Kerns RD, Becker WC, Trafton JA. Measurement of adherence to clinical practice guidelines for opioid therapy for chronic pain. Transl Behav Med. 2012 Mar;2(1):57-64. doi: 10.1007/s13142-011-0104-5.
Results Reference
result

Learn more about this trial

Care Management for the Effective Use of Opioids

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs