search
Back to results

Vasculaire Compression System Increases Flow Velocity in the Femoral Vein

Primary Purpose

Venous Thrombosis

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Pneumatic Compression therapy
Sponsored by
Venous Health Systems, Inc.
About
Eligibility
Locations
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional prevention trial for Venous Thrombosis focused on measuring Deep Vein Thrombosis, Effects of compression therapy, Peak Flow Velocity

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 65 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male or female subjects between 18 years old and 65 years old;
  • Capable of and willing to lay supine for approximately one hour;
  • Subjects must provide written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) or suspected DVT;
  • History of vascular disease, e.g. coronary or peripheral artery disease;
  • History of stroke;
  • History of pulmonary edema;
  • History of congestive heart failure;
  • Diabetes mellitus;
  • Past or present smoker;
  • Surgery or trauma to the right leg within the last six months;
  • Open ulcers or wounds on the right leg;
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding.

Sites / Locations

  • Venous Health System, Inc.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Change in Femoral Venous Peak Flow Velocity Compared to Resting Baseline
The femoral vein in the mid-thigh area was located and the femoral venous Peak Flow Velocity (PFV)was measured using duplex ultrasound during the compression phase of treatment. PFV is the maximum velocity of blood flow achieved when the foot and calf compression is applied. The PFV was then compared to the subject's own baseline PFV using a paired t-test.

Secondary Outcome Measures

PFV Percent Augmentation
Peak Flow Velocity (PFV) from the compression phase subtracted from the PFV from the decompression phase divided by the PFV from the decompression phase expressed as the percent augmentation.
Subject Comfort
Subject comfort was measured on a scale 1 to 5 (1=negative response; 5=positive response) during the sleeve installation, during use, and completion.

Full Information

First Posted
November 10, 2010
Last Updated
March 2, 2011
Sponsor
Venous Health Systems, Inc.
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01240330
Brief Title
Vasculaire Compression System Increases Flow Velocity in the Femoral Vein
Official Title
Evaluation of the Effect of the Vasculaire Compression System on Flow Velocity in the Femoral Vein
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
March 2011
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
August 2010 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
September 2010 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
September 2010 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Name of the Sponsor
Venous Health Systems, Inc.

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The objective of this clinical study was to demonstrate the performance of the Vasculaire Compression System to increase femoral venous peak velocity (PFV) in healthy subjects. This study was a single-arm, open label, prospective, single-center clinical study.
Detailed Description
Venous thromboembolism, e.g. deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism, occurs in approximately one in 1,000 persons in the United States annually and results in more than 250,000 hospital admissions annually in the United States. Intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC), which prevents stasis in the lower limbs, has been shown to be a safe and effective method of prophylaxis of DVT in studies comparing the incidence of DVT and pulmonary embolism with and without IPC. IPC devices decrease venous stasis by augmenting the venous blood flow in the lower extremities. Studies have suggested that an important indicator of the effectiveness of an IPC device in preventing DVT is the peak femoral venous velocity augmentation during the compression phase as compared with the decompression phase of the device. IPC devices produced in the early 1980s and 1990s were cumbersome, noisy and required external power sources, making them suitable only for non-ambulatory patients. Furthermore, these devices have been associated with poor compliance in trauma patients in a hospital setting, and the poor compliance was associated with a higher rate of DVT. The aim of this study is to test the hemodynamic performance of a new portable IPC device, the Venous Health Systems' Vasculaire Compression System. This new device is designed to provide patient comfort and convenience of use while providing similar improvement in venous blood flow when compared with existing IPC devices.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Venous Thrombosis
Keywords
Deep Vein Thrombosis, Effects of compression therapy, Peak Flow Velocity

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Prevention
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
33 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Pneumatic Compression therapy
Other Intervention Name(s)
Intermittent pneumatic compression, Sequential compression
Intervention Description
Subject comparison analysis of femoral venous Peak Flow Velocity at rest and during compression therapy.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in Femoral Venous Peak Flow Velocity Compared to Resting Baseline
Description
The femoral vein in the mid-thigh area was located and the femoral venous Peak Flow Velocity (PFV)was measured using duplex ultrasound during the compression phase of treatment. PFV is the maximum velocity of blood flow achieved when the foot and calf compression is applied. The PFV was then compared to the subject's own baseline PFV using a paired t-test.
Time Frame
3 measurements/10 min. therapy
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
PFV Percent Augmentation
Description
Peak Flow Velocity (PFV) from the compression phase subtracted from the PFV from the decompression phase divided by the PFV from the decompression phase expressed as the percent augmentation.
Time Frame
3 measurements/10 minute therapy
Title
Subject Comfort
Description
Subject comfort was measured on a scale 1 to 5 (1=negative response; 5=positive response) during the sleeve installation, during use, and completion.
Time Frame
10 min therapy

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
65 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Male or female subjects between 18 years old and 65 years old; Capable of and willing to lay supine for approximately one hour; Subjects must provide written informed consent Exclusion Criteria: History of Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) or suspected DVT; History of vascular disease, e.g. coronary or peripheral artery disease; History of stroke; History of pulmonary edema; History of congestive heart failure; Diabetes mellitus; Past or present smoker; Surgery or trauma to the right leg within the last six months; Open ulcers or wounds on the right leg; Pregnant or breastfeeding.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Thomas J Fogarty, M.D.
Organizational Affiliation
Founder
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Venous Health System, Inc.
City
Portola Valley
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
94028
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

Vasculaire Compression System Increases Flow Velocity in the Femoral Vein

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs