search
Back to results

Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Hydrocodone Bitartrate Extended-Release Tablets (CEP-33237) for Relief of Moderate to Severe Pain in Patients With Osteoarthritis or Low Back Pain Who Require Opioid Treatment for an Extended Period of Time

Primary Purpose

Chronic Pain

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Hydrocodone ER
Placebo
Sponsored by
Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc.
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Chronic Pain focused on measuring osteoarthritis, low back pain, Moderate to Severe Pain

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 80 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • The patient is able to speak English and is willing to provide written informed consent, including a written opioid agreement, to participate in this study.
  • The patient must be willing and able to successfully self-administer the study drug, comply with study restrictions, complete the electronic diary, and return to the clinic for scheduled study visits as specified in this protocol.
  • Women of childbearing potential (not surgically sterile or 2 years postmenopausal), must use a medically accepted method of contraception and must agree to continue use of this method for the duration of the study and for 30 days after participation in the study, and have a negative pregnancy test at screening.
  • The patient has pain of at least 3 months' duration associated with osteoarthritis or low back pain.
  • The patient reports an average pain intensity score, over the prior 24 hours, of 5 or more on the 11-point numerical rating scale.
  • If the patient is receiving physical therapy, biofeedback therapy, acupuncture therapy, or herbal remedies, these therapies must remain unchanged during the study.
  • The patient must not participate in other study involving an investigational agent while enrolled into the present study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • The patient has known or suspected hypersensitivities, allergies, or other contraindications to any ingredient in the study drug.
  • The patient has a recent history (within 5 years) or current evidence of alcohol or other substance abuse with the exception of nicotine or caffeine.
  • The patient has medical or psychiatric disease that, in the opinion of the investigator, would compromise collected data.
  • The patient is taking a total (ie, around-the-clock plus rescue medication) of more than 135 mg/day of oxycodone, or equivalent, during the 14 days prior to screening.
  • The patient has a history of suicidality.
  • The patient is expected to have surgery during the study.
  • The patient's primary painful condition under study is related to any source of chronic pain other than osteoarthritis or low back pain.
  • The patient is pregnant or lactating.
  • The patient has active malignancy.
  • The patient has human immunodeficiency virus (HIV).
  • In the judgment of the investigator, the patient has any clinically significant deviation from normal in the physical examination and/or clinical laboratory test values.
  • The patient has cardiopulmonary disease that would, in the opinion of the investigator, significantly increase the risk of treatment with opioids.
  • The patient has participated in a study involving an investigational drug in the previous 30 days.
  • The patient has received a monoamine oxidase inhibitor (MAOI) within 14 days before the first treatment with study drug.
  • The patient has any other medical condition or is receiving concomitant medication/therapy (e.g., regional nerve block) that would, in the opinion of the investigator, compromise the patient's safety or compliance with the study protocol, or compromise collected data.
  • The patient is involved in active litigation in regard to the pain currently being treated.
  • The patient has a positive urine drug screen (UDS) that is not medically explainable.
  • The investigator feels that the patient is not suitable for the study for any reason.

Sites / Locations

  • Horizon Research Group LLC
  • Radiant Research, Inc.
  • Radiant Research, Inc.
  • Radiant Research Inc.
  • Physician Alliance Research Center
  • Associated Pharmaceutical Research Center, Inc.
  • Providence Clinical Research
  • Synergy Clinical Research
  • Research Center of Fresno, Inc.
  • Pacific Coast Pain Management Center
  • South Orange County Surgical Medical Group
  • Robert M. Karns, MD A Medical Corporation
  • Accelovance, Inc.
  • Radiant Research, Inc.
  • Bayview Research Group, LLC
  • Radiant Research, Inc
  • Clinical Research of West Florida, Inc.
  • Avail Clinical Research, LLC
  • International Research Associates, LLC
  • Compass Research
  • Radiant Research, Inc.
  • Gold Coast Research LLC
  • Sarasota Pain Medicine Research LLC
  • Clinical Research of West Florida, Inc.
  • Drug Studies America
  • Georgia Institute for Clinical Research, LLC
  • Better Health Clinical Research, Inc.
  • Millennium Pain Center
  • Medex Healthcare Research, Inc.
  • Rehabilitation Associates of Indiana
  • International Clinical Research, Inc.
  • Community Research
  • The Pain Treatment Center of the Bluegrass
  • Horizon Research Group, LLC
  • WK River Cities Clinical Research Center
  • MidAtlantic Pain Medicine Center
  • Beacon Clinical Research, LLC
  • HealthCare Research
  • Medex Healthcare Research Inc.
  • Sundance Clinical Research, LLC
  • Meridian Clinical Research
  • Clinical Research Center of Nevada
  • Advanced Pain Consultants
  • Upstate Clinical Research Associates
  • Wake Research Associates
  • Radiant Research, Inc
  • Sterling Research Group, Ltd.
  • Community Research, Inc
  • Community Research, Inc
  • Rapid Medical Research
  • Columbus Clinical Research
  • SP Research
  • Pain Research of Oregon
  • Summit Research Network Inc.
  • Brandywine Clinical Research
  • Tipton Medical and Diagnostic Center
  • AMH Feasterville Family Health Care Center
  • Clinical Research Center of Reading
  • Omega Medical Research
  • Radiant Research Inc.
  • Greenville Pharmaceutical Research
  • Radiant Research, Inc
  • Trident Institute of Medical Research, LLC
  • South Carolina Pharmaceutical Research
  • KRK Medical Research
  • Radiant Research Dallas
  • Renaissance Clinical Research & Hypertension of Texas, PLLC
  • Medstar Clinical Research
  • Benchmark Research
  • DCT-Sugarland, LLC
  • Hillcrest Family Health Centers
  • Aspen Clinical Research, LLC
  • Lifetree Clinical Research

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Placebo Comparator

Experimental

Arm Label

Placebo

Hydrocodone ER

Arm Description

Participants were administered hydrocodone ER tablets at dosages of 15, 30, 45, 60, or 90 mg every 12 hours at the dosage deemed successful for managing their pain during the titration period. During the treatment period, participants were administered placebo tablets every 12 hours that matched the dosage deemed successful for managing their pain during the titration period. A step-wise, double-blind schedule to tamper off active drug was implemented during the first 2 weeks of the 12-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled treatment period to reduce the risk of withdrawal effects in participants randomly assigned to placebo.

Participants were administered hydrocodone ER tablets at dosages of 15, 30, 45, 60, or 90 mg every 12 hours at the dosage deemed successful for managing their pain during the titration period. During the 12-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled treatment period, participants randomly assigned to hydrocodone ER were administered tablets every 12 hours at the dosage deemed successful for managing their pain during the titration period.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Weekly Average Pain Intensity (wAPI)
The primary efficacy variable was the change from baseline to week 12 in the wAPI. The API over the previous 24 hours, based on the 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS 11), was collected daily by e-diary. The Week 12 wAPI scores from the previous 7 days were calculated for each study visit and averaged. The baseline wAPI score was calculated by averaging API scores from 3 to 12 days when the successful dose of hydrocodone extended release was confirmed at the end of the open label titration period, before patients were randomly assigned study drug. In the case of missing week-12 data due to early withdrawal from the study, or excessive rescue medication usage, the wAPI for week 12 was imputed. The Numeric Rating Scale (NRS-11) is an 11-point scale for patient self-reporting of pain on a Likert-type scale in which 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain imaginable. Negative change from baseline values indicate lessening in pain intensity.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Percentage of Participants Withdrawn From the Study During the Double-Blind Treatment Period By Reason
Percentage of participants who withdrew from the study during the double-blind treatment period. Withdrawal is due to any cause, including lack of efficacy.
Kaplan-Meier Estimates for Time to Discontinuation From the Study
Kaplan-Meier estimates for time to discontinuation from the study (due to any cause) was calculated as the number of days since participants were randomly assigned to study drug treatment, ie, the difference between the date the participants withdrew and the date participants were randomly assigned to study drug treatment. The censoring flag was set to 0 if a participant was withdrawn from study drug treatment early and was set to 1 if the participant completed the 12 week treatment period. Censoring time was calculated as the difference of treatment completion date (ie, date of last study drug administration) and date participant was randomly assigned to study drug treatment.
Participants With a Weekly Average Pain Intensity (wAPI) Increase From Baseline Exceeding 33%
The API over the previous 24 hours, based on the 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS 11), was collected daily by e-diary. The wAPI scores from the previous 7 days were calculated for each study visit and averaged. The baseline wAPI score was calculated by averaging API scores from 3 to 12 days when the successful dose of hydrocodone extended release was confirmed at the end of the open label titration period, before patients were randomly assigned study drug. The Numeric Rating Scale (NRS-11) is an 11-point scale for patient self-reporting of pain on a Likert-type scale in which 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain imaginable.
Participants With a Weekly Average Pain Intensity (wAPI) Increase From Baseline Exceeding 50%
The API over the previous 24 hours, based on the 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS 11), was collected daily by e-diary. The wAPI scores from the previous 7 days were calculated for each study visit and averaged. The baseline wAPI score was calculated by averaging API scores from 3 to 12 days when the successful dose of hydrocodone extended release was confirmed at the end of the open label titration period, before patients were randomly assigned study drug. The Numeric Rating Scale (NRS-11) is an 11-point scale for patient self-reporting of pain on a Likert-type scale in which 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain imaginable.
Weekly Average Pain Intensity (wAPI) Scores During the Double-blind Treatment Period
The API over the previous 24 hours, based on the 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS 11), was collected daily by e-diary. The wAPI scores from the previous 7 days were calculated for each study visit and averaged. The baseline wAPI score was calculated by averaging API scores from 3 to 12 days when the successful dose of hydrocodone extended release was confirmed at the end of the open label titration period, before patients were randomly assigned study drug. The Numeric Rating Scale (NRS-11) is an 11-point scale for patient self-reporting of pain on a Likert-type scale in which 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain imaginable.
Weekly Average Worst Pain Intensity (WPI) Scores During the Double-blind Treatment Period
The WPI was recorded by the patient in the e-diary daily throughout the study, based on the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS-11). Participants were asked to select the number that best described their WPI over the previous 24 hours. Values were averaged for each week. The Numeric Rating Scale (NRS-11) is an 11-point scale for patient self-reporting of pain on a Likert-type scale in which 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain imaginable.
Clinician Assessment of Patient Function (CAPF) at Week 4
Clinicians assessed participants across 5 dimensions: Patients general activities Patients walking ability Patients ability to work/perform activities of daily living Patients relationships with others Patients enjoyment of life Assessments are rated on a 7-point scale, in which 1 is very much worsened and 7 is very much improved since the start of the study.
Clinician Assessment of Patient Function (CAPF) at Week 8
Clinicians assessed participants across 5 dimensions: Patients general activities Patients walking ability Patients ability to work/perform activities of daily living Patients relationships with others Patients enjoyment of life Assessments are rated on a 7-point scale, in which 1 is very much worsened and 7 is very much improved since the start of the study.
Clinician Assessment of Patient Function (CAPF) at Week 12
Clinicians assessed participants across 5 dimensions: Patients general activities Patients walking ability Patients ability to work/perform activities of daily living Patients relationships with others Patients enjoyment of life Assessments are rated on a 7-point scale, in which 1 is very much worsened and 7 is very much improved since the start of the study.
Clinician Assessment of Patient Function (CAPF) at Endpoint
Clinicians assessed participants across 5 dimensions: Patients general activities Patients walking ability Patients ability to work/perform activities of daily living Patients relationships with others Patients enjoyment of life Assessments are rated on a 7-point scale, in which 1 is very much worsened and 7 is very much improved since the start of the study. Endpoint values are the last observed postbaseline data.
Patient Assessment of Function (PAF) at Week 4
The PAF is a self-administered questionnaire used to measure patients' assessment of their own ability to function in normal activities. Answers to the 7 questions were rated on a 7 point scale in which 1 was very much worsened and 7 were very much improved since the start of the study. The seven functional areas are: ability to go to work ability to perform at work (includes both work outside the home and housework) ability to walk ability to exercise ability to participate in social events ability to have sex ability to enjoy life
Patient Assessment of Function (PAF) at Week 8
The PAF is a self-administered questionnaire used to measure patients' assessment of their own ability to function in normal activities. Answers to the 7 questions were rated on a 7 point scale in which 1 was very much worsened and 7 were very much improved since the start of the study. The seven functional areas are: ability to go to work ability to perform at work (includes both work outside the home and housework) ability to walk ability to exercise ability to participate in social events ability to have sex ability to enjoy life
Patient Assessment of Function (PAF) at Week 12
The PAF is a self-administered questionnaire used to measure patients' assessment of their own ability to function in normal activities. Answers to the 7 questions were rated on a 7 point scale in which 1 was very much worsened and 7 were very much improved since the start of the study. The seven functional areas are: ability to go to work ability to perform at work (includes both work outside the home and housework) ability to walk ability to exercise ability to participate in social events ability to have sex ability to enjoy life
Patient Assessment of Function (PAF) at Endpoint
The PAF is a self-administered questionnaire used to measure patients' assessment of their own ability to function in normal activities. Answers to the 7 questions were rated on a 7 point scale in which 1 was very much worsened and 7 were very much improved since the start of the study. The seven functional areas are: ability to go to work ability to perform at work (includes both work outside the home and housework) ability to walk ability to exercise ability to participate in social events ability to have sex ability to enjoy life Endpoint values are the last observed postbaseline data.
Clinician Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S) of Illness Scores During the Double-blind Treatment Period
The CGI-S is a clinician-rated scale that assesses the severity of the patient's pain condition and response to the treatment. Severity of illness, as related to moderate to severe pain, consists of the following 7 categories: 1 normal-shows no sign of illness, 2 borderline ill, 3 mildly (slightly) ill, 4 moderately ill, 5 markedly ill, 6 severely ill, and 7 among the most extremely ill (Guy 1976). The clinician assesses the severity of the patient's condition, based on the clinician's total clinical experience with patients with this condition, in response to treatment. Endpoint values are the last observed postbaseline data.
Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Physical and Mental Component Summary Scores at Baseline, Week 12 and Endpoint
SF-36 is a generic 36-item questionnaire measuring health-related quality of life (HRQL) covering 2 summary measures: physical component summary (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS). The SF-36 consists of 8 subscales. The PCS is represented by 4 subscales: physical function, role limitations due to physical problems, pain, and general health perception. The MCS is represented by 4 subscales: vitality, social function, role limitations due to emotional problems, and mental health. Participants self-report on items in a subscale that have between 2-6 choices per item using Likert-type responses (e.g. none of the time, some of the time, etc.). PCS and MCS scores are constructed as a T-score with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10 and no minimum or maximum score; higher scores indicate better health status.
Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form (BPI-SF) Pain Interference Mean Score During the Double-Blind Treatment Period
For pain interference, the BPI-SF used numerical scales to measure how much pain had interfered with 7 daily activities, including general activity, walking, work, mood, enjoyment of life, relations with others, and sleep in the past 24 hours. The scale used an 11 point Likert scale; range: 0 [does not interfere] to 10 [completely interferes]. BPI pain interference was typically scored as the mean of the 7 interference items. This mean could be used if at least 4 of 7 items had been completed on a given administration.
Participants With Adverse Events
An adverse event (AE) was defined in the protocol as any untoward medical occurrence that develops or worsens in severity during the conduct of a clinical study and does not necessarily have a causal relationship to the study drug. Severity was rated by the investigator on a scale of mild, moderate and severe, with severe= an inability to carry out usual activities. Relation of AE to treatment was determined by the investigator. Serious AEs include death, a life-threatening adverse event, inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, persistent or significant disability or incapacity, a congenital anomaly or birth defect, OR an important medical event that jeopardized the patient and required medical intervention to prevent the previously listed serious outcomes.
Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Vital Signs Values During the Double-Blind Treatment Period
Data represents participants with potentially clinically significant (PCS) vital sign values. Significance criteria Pulse - high: >=120 and increase of >= 15 beats/minute from baseline Pulse - low: <=50 and decrease of >=15 beats/minute Systolic blood pressure - high: >=180 and increase >=20 mmHg Systolic blood pressure - low: <=90 and decrease >=20 mmHg Diastolic blood pressure - high: >=105 and increase of >=15 mmHg Diastolic blood pressure - low: <=50 and decrease of >=15 mmHg
Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Laboratory Values During the Double-Blind Treatment Period
Data represents participants with potentially clinically significant abnormal serum chemistry, hematology and urinalysis values. Significance criteria: Blood urea nitrogen: >=10.71 mmol/L Uric acid: M>=625, F>=506 μmol/L Hemoglobin: M<=115, F<=95 g/dL Hematocrit: M<0.37, F<0.32 % Urinalysis: blood (hemoglobin) and total protein: >=2 unit increase from baseline
Subjective Opiate Withdrawal Scales (SOWS) Scores During the Double-Blind Treatment Period
The results of the SOWS were collected in the e-diary daily during the first 4 weeks of the double blind treatment period and then during clinic visits at weeks 8 and 12 or early termination. The SOWS was a self administered questionnaire used to measure a participant's signs and symptoms of withdrawal from opiates. The scale contained 16 symptoms (eg, my nose is running; I feel restless), the participant rated the intensity on a scale of 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely) for a total score of 0-64. The daily total score for the first 4 weeks was the largest score observed during the time period preceding that visit. For example, the week 1 score for each participant was the largest total score on any day between baseline and the night before the week 1 visit; the week 4 score for each participant was the largest score observed between the week 2 visit and the night before the week 4 visit.
Clinical Opiate Withdrawal Scales (COWS) Scores During the Double-Blind Treatment Period
The COWS was a clinician rated scale used to measure a participant's signs and symptoms of withdrawal from opiates, with ratings based only on apparent relationship to withdrawal. The COWS was performed at day 0 and weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12 (double blind treatment period) or early termination. The scale contained 11 signs/symptoms whose intensity the clinician rated on a scale of 0 to 4 or 5. A total score was calculated as the sum of the responses to the 11 signs/symptoms for a total range of 0-48. Withdrawal severity was classified, based on the total score, as follows: 0 to 4=normal 5 to 12=mild 13 to 24=moderate 25 to 36=moderately severe >36=severe
Addiction Behavior Checklist (ABC) Total Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Double-Blind Treatment Periods
The ABC was a clinician rated scale that consisted of a brief (20 item) questionnaire designed to track behaviors characteristic of addiction related to prescription opioid medications in chronic pain populations. Items were focused on observable behaviors noted both during and between clinic visits. Each affirmative response was counted as one point, and points were added to calculate the total score, consequently resulting in scores ranging from 0 to 20 (0=no addiction-related behaviors seen and higher scores indicating an increasing number of addition-related behaviors seen). The ABC was to be performed at visits 2 and 7 (beginning and end of Open-label Titration period) and weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12 (Double-blind Treatment period) or early termination.
Current Opioid Misuse Measures (COMM) Total Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Double-Blind Treatment Periods
The COMM was a clinician rated scale developed as a brief self report measure of current aberrant drug-related behavior for patients with chronic pain who were already on long term opioid therapy. A total score was calculated as the sum of the 17 questions. The total score ranged from 0 to 68. A score of 0 indicates no aberrant drug-related behaviors were seen. Patients with a total score of 9 or greater were classified as exhibiting aberrant drug-related behavior. The COMM was to be performed at visits 2 and 7 (beginning and end of Open-label Titration period) and weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12 (Double-blind Treatment period) or early termination.
Change From Baseline to Endpoint in the Double-Blind Treatment Phase in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters
A 12-lead ECG was conducted at baseline and the last visit during the double-blind treatment period (week 12, or early termination).

Full Information

First Posted
November 10, 2010
Last Updated
June 2, 2017
Sponsor
Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc.
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01240863
Brief Title
Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Hydrocodone Bitartrate Extended-Release Tablets (CEP-33237) for Relief of Moderate to Severe Pain in Patients With Osteoarthritis or Low Back Pain Who Require Opioid Treatment for an Extended Period of Time
Official Title
A 12-Week, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Hydrocodone Bitartrate Extended-Release Tablets (CEP-33237) at 15 to 90 mg Every 12 Hours for Relief of Moderate to Severe Pain in Patients With Osteoarthritis or Low Back Pain Who Require Opioid Treatment for an Extended Period of Time
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
June 2017
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
November 2010 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
August 2011 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
August 2011 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc.

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate efficacy of hydrocodone extended-release (ER) tablets compared with placebo in alleviating moderate to severe pain in patients with osteoarthritis or low back pain as assessed by the weekly Average Pain Intensity (API) at week 12.
Detailed Description
The study consisted of a screening period of approximately 7 to 14 days, an open label titration period of up to 6 weeks, and a double blind treatment period of 12 weeks. Participants entered the open label titration period and received hydrocodone ER tablets beginning with 15 mg every 12 hours for 3 to 7 days. The objective of the open label titration period was to find the successful dose of hydrocodone ER tablets that produced stable pain relief (defined as an Average Pain Intensity (API) score of 4 or less on the 11-point numerical rating scale for either 3 consecutive days or 3 out of 5 consecutive days while the patient was maintained on the same dose of study drug for up to 7 days). Patients returned to the study center prior to each dose adjustment. Participants who met the criterion of a stabilized dose were randomly assigned into the 12 week, double blind, placebo controlled treatment period on the final day of the open label titration period (baseline visit). Patients began treatment with double blind study drug at the effective dose of hydrocodone ER tablets achieved during the titration period or matching placebo. Rescue medication was permitted in addition to the study drug during the double blind treatment period.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Chronic Pain
Keywords
osteoarthritis, low back pain, Moderate to Severe Pain

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
391 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Placebo
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
Participants were administered hydrocodone ER tablets at dosages of 15, 30, 45, 60, or 90 mg every 12 hours at the dosage deemed successful for managing their pain during the titration period. During the treatment period, participants were administered placebo tablets every 12 hours that matched the dosage deemed successful for managing their pain during the titration period. A step-wise, double-blind schedule to tamper off active drug was implemented during the first 2 weeks of the 12-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled treatment period to reduce the risk of withdrawal effects in participants randomly assigned to placebo.
Arm Title
Hydrocodone ER
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participants were administered hydrocodone ER tablets at dosages of 15, 30, 45, 60, or 90 mg every 12 hours at the dosage deemed successful for managing their pain during the titration period. During the 12-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled treatment period, participants randomly assigned to hydrocodone ER were administered tablets every 12 hours at the dosage deemed successful for managing their pain during the titration period.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Hydrocodone ER
Other Intervention Name(s)
CEP-33237, Hydrocodone bitartrate extended-release
Intervention Description
During the open-label, titration period, all participants were administered hydrocodone ER tablets at dosages of 15, 30, 45, 60, or 90 mg every 12 hours to identify a dosage deemed successful for managing their pain. Hydrocodone ER was taken by participants randomized to the hydrocodone ER treatment arm during the double-blind treatment period at the dose level identified during the titration period. Participants were instructed to take tablets with a glass of water on an empty stomach at least 1 hour before or 2 hours after eating.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Placebo
Intervention Description
Placebo matching the active drug dose identified during the titration period was taken by participants randomized to the placebo treatment arm during the double-blind treatment period. Participants were instructed to take intervention with a glass of water on an empty stomach at least 1 hour before or 2 hours after eating.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Weekly Average Pain Intensity (wAPI)
Description
The primary efficacy variable was the change from baseline to week 12 in the wAPI. The API over the previous 24 hours, based on the 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS 11), was collected daily by e-diary. The Week 12 wAPI scores from the previous 7 days were calculated for each study visit and averaged. The baseline wAPI score was calculated by averaging API scores from 3 to 12 days when the successful dose of hydrocodone extended release was confirmed at the end of the open label titration period, before patients were randomly assigned study drug. In the case of missing week-12 data due to early withdrawal from the study, or excessive rescue medication usage, the wAPI for week 12 was imputed. The Numeric Rating Scale (NRS-11) is an 11-point scale for patient self-reporting of pain on a Likert-type scale in which 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain imaginable. Negative change from baseline values indicate lessening in pain intensity.
Time Frame
Baseline (end of Open-Label Titration Period), Week 12 of Double-blind Treatment Period
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Percentage of Participants Withdrawn From the Study During the Double-Blind Treatment Period By Reason
Description
Percentage of participants who withdrew from the study during the double-blind treatment period. Withdrawal is due to any cause, including lack of efficacy.
Time Frame
Day 1 to Week 12 of the double-blind treatment period
Title
Kaplan-Meier Estimates for Time to Discontinuation From the Study
Description
Kaplan-Meier estimates for time to discontinuation from the study (due to any cause) was calculated as the number of days since participants were randomly assigned to study drug treatment, ie, the difference between the date the participants withdrew and the date participants were randomly assigned to study drug treatment. The censoring flag was set to 0 if a participant was withdrawn from study drug treatment early and was set to 1 if the participant completed the 12 week treatment period. Censoring time was calculated as the difference of treatment completion date (ie, date of last study drug administration) and date participant was randomly assigned to study drug treatment.
Time Frame
Day 1 to Week 12 of the double-blind treatment period
Title
Participants With a Weekly Average Pain Intensity (wAPI) Increase From Baseline Exceeding 33%
Description
The API over the previous 24 hours, based on the 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS 11), was collected daily by e-diary. The wAPI scores from the previous 7 days were calculated for each study visit and averaged. The baseline wAPI score was calculated by averaging API scores from 3 to 12 days when the successful dose of hydrocodone extended release was confirmed at the end of the open label titration period, before patients were randomly assigned study drug. The Numeric Rating Scale (NRS-11) is an 11-point scale for patient self-reporting of pain on a Likert-type scale in which 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain imaginable.
Time Frame
Baseline (end of Open-Label Titration Period), Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12 of the Double-blind treatment period
Title
Participants With a Weekly Average Pain Intensity (wAPI) Increase From Baseline Exceeding 50%
Description
The API over the previous 24 hours, based on the 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS 11), was collected daily by e-diary. The wAPI scores from the previous 7 days were calculated for each study visit and averaged. The baseline wAPI score was calculated by averaging API scores from 3 to 12 days when the successful dose of hydrocodone extended release was confirmed at the end of the open label titration period, before patients were randomly assigned study drug. The Numeric Rating Scale (NRS-11) is an 11-point scale for patient self-reporting of pain on a Likert-type scale in which 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain imaginable.
Time Frame
Baseline (end of Open-Label Titration Period), Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12 of the Double-blind treatment period
Title
Weekly Average Pain Intensity (wAPI) Scores During the Double-blind Treatment Period
Description
The API over the previous 24 hours, based on the 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS 11), was collected daily by e-diary. The wAPI scores from the previous 7 days were calculated for each study visit and averaged. The baseline wAPI score was calculated by averaging API scores from 3 to 12 days when the successful dose of hydrocodone extended release was confirmed at the end of the open label titration period, before patients were randomly assigned study drug. The Numeric Rating Scale (NRS-11) is an 11-point scale for patient self-reporting of pain on a Likert-type scale in which 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain imaginable.
Time Frame
Baseline (end of Open-Label Titration Period), Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12 of the Double-blind treatment period
Title
Weekly Average Worst Pain Intensity (WPI) Scores During the Double-blind Treatment Period
Description
The WPI was recorded by the patient in the e-diary daily throughout the study, based on the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS-11). Participants were asked to select the number that best described their WPI over the previous 24 hours. Values were averaged for each week. The Numeric Rating Scale (NRS-11) is an 11-point scale for patient self-reporting of pain on a Likert-type scale in which 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain imaginable.
Time Frame
Baseline (end of Open-Label Titration Period), Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12 of the Double-blind treatment period
Title
Clinician Assessment of Patient Function (CAPF) at Week 4
Description
Clinicians assessed participants across 5 dimensions: Patients general activities Patients walking ability Patients ability to work/perform activities of daily living Patients relationships with others Patients enjoyment of life Assessments are rated on a 7-point scale, in which 1 is very much worsened and 7 is very much improved since the start of the study.
Time Frame
Week 4 of the Double-blind Treatment Period
Title
Clinician Assessment of Patient Function (CAPF) at Week 8
Description
Clinicians assessed participants across 5 dimensions: Patients general activities Patients walking ability Patients ability to work/perform activities of daily living Patients relationships with others Patients enjoyment of life Assessments are rated on a 7-point scale, in which 1 is very much worsened and 7 is very much improved since the start of the study.
Time Frame
Week 8 of the Double-blind Treatment Period
Title
Clinician Assessment of Patient Function (CAPF) at Week 12
Description
Clinicians assessed participants across 5 dimensions: Patients general activities Patients walking ability Patients ability to work/perform activities of daily living Patients relationships with others Patients enjoyment of life Assessments are rated on a 7-point scale, in which 1 is very much worsened and 7 is very much improved since the start of the study.
Time Frame
Week 12 of the Double-blind Treatment Period
Title
Clinician Assessment of Patient Function (CAPF) at Endpoint
Description
Clinicians assessed participants across 5 dimensions: Patients general activities Patients walking ability Patients ability to work/perform activities of daily living Patients relationships with others Patients enjoyment of life Assessments are rated on a 7-point scale, in which 1 is very much worsened and 7 is very much improved since the start of the study. Endpoint values are the last observed postbaseline data.
Time Frame
Endpoint of the Double-blind Treatment Period (up to week 12)
Title
Patient Assessment of Function (PAF) at Week 4
Description
The PAF is a self-administered questionnaire used to measure patients' assessment of their own ability to function in normal activities. Answers to the 7 questions were rated on a 7 point scale in which 1 was very much worsened and 7 were very much improved since the start of the study. The seven functional areas are: ability to go to work ability to perform at work (includes both work outside the home and housework) ability to walk ability to exercise ability to participate in social events ability to have sex ability to enjoy life
Time Frame
Week 4 of the Double-blind Treatment Period
Title
Patient Assessment of Function (PAF) at Week 8
Description
The PAF is a self-administered questionnaire used to measure patients' assessment of their own ability to function in normal activities. Answers to the 7 questions were rated on a 7 point scale in which 1 was very much worsened and 7 were very much improved since the start of the study. The seven functional areas are: ability to go to work ability to perform at work (includes both work outside the home and housework) ability to walk ability to exercise ability to participate in social events ability to have sex ability to enjoy life
Time Frame
Week 8 of the Double-blind Treatment Period
Title
Patient Assessment of Function (PAF) at Week 12
Description
The PAF is a self-administered questionnaire used to measure patients' assessment of their own ability to function in normal activities. Answers to the 7 questions were rated on a 7 point scale in which 1 was very much worsened and 7 were very much improved since the start of the study. The seven functional areas are: ability to go to work ability to perform at work (includes both work outside the home and housework) ability to walk ability to exercise ability to participate in social events ability to have sex ability to enjoy life
Time Frame
Week 12 of the Double-blind Treatment Period
Title
Patient Assessment of Function (PAF) at Endpoint
Description
The PAF is a self-administered questionnaire used to measure patients' assessment of their own ability to function in normal activities. Answers to the 7 questions were rated on a 7 point scale in which 1 was very much worsened and 7 were very much improved since the start of the study. The seven functional areas are: ability to go to work ability to perform at work (includes both work outside the home and housework) ability to walk ability to exercise ability to participate in social events ability to have sex ability to enjoy life Endpoint values are the last observed postbaseline data.
Time Frame
Endpoint of the Double-blind Treatment Period (up to week 12)
Title
Clinician Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S) of Illness Scores During the Double-blind Treatment Period
Description
The CGI-S is a clinician-rated scale that assesses the severity of the patient's pain condition and response to the treatment. Severity of illness, as related to moderate to severe pain, consists of the following 7 categories: 1 normal-shows no sign of illness, 2 borderline ill, 3 mildly (slightly) ill, 4 moderately ill, 5 markedly ill, 6 severely ill, and 7 among the most extremely ill (Guy 1976). The clinician assesses the severity of the patient's condition, based on the clinician's total clinical experience with patients with this condition, in response to treatment. Endpoint values are the last observed postbaseline data.
Time Frame
Baseline (end of Open-Label Titration Period), Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12 of the Double-blind treatment period
Title
Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Physical and Mental Component Summary Scores at Baseline, Week 12 and Endpoint
Description
SF-36 is a generic 36-item questionnaire measuring health-related quality of life (HRQL) covering 2 summary measures: physical component summary (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS). The SF-36 consists of 8 subscales. The PCS is represented by 4 subscales: physical function, role limitations due to physical problems, pain, and general health perception. The MCS is represented by 4 subscales: vitality, social function, role limitations due to emotional problems, and mental health. Participants self-report on items in a subscale that have between 2-6 choices per item using Likert-type responses (e.g. none of the time, some of the time, etc.). PCS and MCS scores are constructed as a T-score with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10 and no minimum or maximum score; higher scores indicate better health status.
Time Frame
Baseline (end of Open-Label Titration Period), Week 12 and Endpoint (last visit up to week 12) of the Double-blind treatment period
Title
Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form (BPI-SF) Pain Interference Mean Score During the Double-Blind Treatment Period
Description
For pain interference, the BPI-SF used numerical scales to measure how much pain had interfered with 7 daily activities, including general activity, walking, work, mood, enjoyment of life, relations with others, and sleep in the past 24 hours. The scale used an 11 point Likert scale; range: 0 [does not interfere] to 10 [completely interferes]. BPI pain interference was typically scored as the mean of the 7 interference items. This mean could be used if at least 4 of 7 items had been completed on a given administration.
Time Frame
Baseline (end of Open-Label Titration Period), Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 and Endpoint (last visit up to week 12) of the Double-blind treatment period
Title
Participants With Adverse Events
Description
An adverse event (AE) was defined in the protocol as any untoward medical occurrence that develops or worsens in severity during the conduct of a clinical study and does not necessarily have a causal relationship to the study drug. Severity was rated by the investigator on a scale of mild, moderate and severe, with severe= an inability to carry out usual activities. Relation of AE to treatment was determined by the investigator. Serious AEs include death, a life-threatening adverse event, inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, persistent or significant disability or incapacity, a congenital anomaly or birth defect, OR an important medical event that jeopardized the patient and required medical intervention to prevent the previously listed serious outcomes.
Time Frame
Day 1 up to Day 52 in Open-Label Titration; Day 1 up to Day 128 in Double-Blind Treatment period
Title
Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Vital Signs Values During the Double-Blind Treatment Period
Description
Data represents participants with potentially clinically significant (PCS) vital sign values. Significance criteria Pulse - high: >=120 and increase of >= 15 beats/minute from baseline Pulse - low: <=50 and decrease of >=15 beats/minute Systolic blood pressure - high: >=180 and increase >=20 mmHg Systolic blood pressure - low: <=90 and decrease >=20 mmHg Diastolic blood pressure - high: >=105 and increase of >=15 mmHg Diastolic blood pressure - low: <=50 and decrease of >=15 mmHg
Time Frame
Day 1 up to Day 128 in Double-Blind Treatment period
Title
Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Laboratory Values During the Double-Blind Treatment Period
Description
Data represents participants with potentially clinically significant abnormal serum chemistry, hematology and urinalysis values. Significance criteria: Blood urea nitrogen: >=10.71 mmol/L Uric acid: M>=625, F>=506 μmol/L Hemoglobin: M<=115, F<=95 g/dL Hematocrit: M<0.37, F<0.32 % Urinalysis: blood (hemoglobin) and total protein: >=2 unit increase from baseline
Time Frame
Day 1 up to Day 128 in Double-Blind Treatment period
Title
Subjective Opiate Withdrawal Scales (SOWS) Scores During the Double-Blind Treatment Period
Description
The results of the SOWS were collected in the e-diary daily during the first 4 weeks of the double blind treatment period and then during clinic visits at weeks 8 and 12 or early termination. The SOWS was a self administered questionnaire used to measure a participant's signs and symptoms of withdrawal from opiates. The scale contained 16 symptoms (eg, my nose is running; I feel restless), the participant rated the intensity on a scale of 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely) for a total score of 0-64. The daily total score for the first 4 weeks was the largest score observed during the time period preceding that visit. For example, the week 1 score for each participant was the largest total score on any day between baseline and the night before the week 1 visit; the week 4 score for each participant was the largest score observed between the week 2 visit and the night before the week 4 visit.
Time Frame
Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 and Endpoint (last visit up to Week 12) of the Double-blind treatment period
Title
Clinical Opiate Withdrawal Scales (COWS) Scores During the Double-Blind Treatment Period
Description
The COWS was a clinician rated scale used to measure a participant's signs and symptoms of withdrawal from opiates, with ratings based only on apparent relationship to withdrawal. The COWS was performed at day 0 and weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12 (double blind treatment period) or early termination. The scale contained 11 signs/symptoms whose intensity the clinician rated on a scale of 0 to 4 or 5. A total score was calculated as the sum of the responses to the 11 signs/symptoms for a total range of 0-48. Withdrawal severity was classified, based on the total score, as follows: 0 to 4=normal 5 to 12=mild 13 to 24=moderate 25 to 36=moderately severe >36=severe
Time Frame
Baseline (end of Open-Label Titration Period), Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 and Endpoint (last visit up to Week 12) of the Double-blind treatment period
Title
Addiction Behavior Checklist (ABC) Total Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Double-Blind Treatment Periods
Description
The ABC was a clinician rated scale that consisted of a brief (20 item) questionnaire designed to track behaviors characteristic of addiction related to prescription opioid medications in chronic pain populations. Items were focused on observable behaviors noted both during and between clinic visits. Each affirmative response was counted as one point, and points were added to calculate the total score, consequently resulting in scores ranging from 0 to 20 (0=no addiction-related behaviors seen and higher scores indicating an increasing number of addition-related behaviors seen). The ABC was to be performed at visits 2 and 7 (beginning and end of Open-label Titration period) and weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12 (Double-blind Treatment period) or early termination.
Time Frame
Baseline for Open-Label Titration period, Baseline for Double-Blind Treatment period (which is also the end of the Open-Label Titration period), Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12, and Endpoint (last visit up to Week 12) of the Double-blind Treatment period
Title
Current Opioid Misuse Measures (COMM) Total Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Double-Blind Treatment Periods
Description
The COMM was a clinician rated scale developed as a brief self report measure of current aberrant drug-related behavior for patients with chronic pain who were already on long term opioid therapy. A total score was calculated as the sum of the 17 questions. The total score ranged from 0 to 68. A score of 0 indicates no aberrant drug-related behaviors were seen. Patients with a total score of 9 or greater were classified as exhibiting aberrant drug-related behavior. The COMM was to be performed at visits 2 and 7 (beginning and end of Open-label Titration period) and weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12 (Double-blind Treatment period) or early termination.
Time Frame
Baseline for Open-Label Titration period, Baseline for Double-Blind Treatment period (which is also the end of the Open-Label Titration period), Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12, and Endpoint (last visit up to Week 12) of the Double-blind Treatment period
Title
Change From Baseline to Endpoint in the Double-Blind Treatment Phase in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters
Description
A 12-lead ECG was conducted at baseline and the last visit during the double-blind treatment period (week 12, or early termination).
Time Frame
Baseline (end of Open-Label Titration Period), Endpoint (last visit up to Week 12) of the Double-blind treatment period

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
80 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: The patient is able to speak English and is willing to provide written informed consent, including a written opioid agreement, to participate in this study. The patient must be willing and able to successfully self-administer the study drug, comply with study restrictions, complete the electronic diary, and return to the clinic for scheduled study visits as specified in this protocol. Women of childbearing potential (not surgically sterile or 2 years postmenopausal), must use a medically accepted method of contraception and must agree to continue use of this method for the duration of the study and for 30 days after participation in the study, and have a negative pregnancy test at screening. The patient has pain of at least 3 months' duration associated with osteoarthritis or low back pain. The patient reports an average pain intensity score, over the prior 24 hours, of 5 or more on the 11-point numerical rating scale. If the patient is receiving physical therapy, biofeedback therapy, acupuncture therapy, or herbal remedies, these therapies must remain unchanged during the study. The patient must not participate in other study involving an investigational agent while enrolled into the present study. Exclusion Criteria: The patient has known or suspected hypersensitivities, allergies, or other contraindications to any ingredient in the study drug. The patient has a recent history (within 5 years) or current evidence of alcohol or other substance abuse with the exception of nicotine or caffeine. The patient has medical or psychiatric disease that, in the opinion of the investigator, would compromise collected data. The patient is taking a total (ie, around-the-clock plus rescue medication) of more than 135 mg/day of oxycodone, or equivalent, during the 14 days prior to screening. The patient has a history of suicidality. The patient is expected to have surgery during the study. The patient's primary painful condition under study is related to any source of chronic pain other than osteoarthritis or low back pain. The patient is pregnant or lactating. The patient has active malignancy. The patient has human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). In the judgment of the investigator, the patient has any clinically significant deviation from normal in the physical examination and/or clinical laboratory test values. The patient has cardiopulmonary disease that would, in the opinion of the investigator, significantly increase the risk of treatment with opioids. The patient has participated in a study involving an investigational drug in the previous 30 days. The patient has received a monoamine oxidase inhibitor (MAOI) within 14 days before the first treatment with study drug. The patient has any other medical condition or is receiving concomitant medication/therapy (e.g., regional nerve block) that would, in the opinion of the investigator, compromise the patient's safety or compliance with the study protocol, or compromise collected data. The patient is involved in active litigation in regard to the pain currently being treated. The patient has a positive urine drug screen (UDS) that is not medically explainable. The investigator feels that the patient is not suitable for the study for any reason.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Sponsor's Medical Expert, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Cephalon
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Horizon Research Group LLC
City
Mobile
State/Province
Alabama
ZIP/Postal Code
36608
Country
United States
Facility Name
Radiant Research, Inc.
City
Chandler
State/Province
Arizona
ZIP/Postal Code
85225
Country
United States
Facility Name
Radiant Research, Inc.
City
Scottsdale
State/Province
Arizona
ZIP/Postal Code
85251
Country
United States
Facility Name
Radiant Research Inc.
City
Tucson
State/Province
Arizona
ZIP/Postal Code
85710
Country
United States
Facility Name
Physician Alliance Research Center
City
Anaheim
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92804
Country
United States
Facility Name
Associated Pharmaceutical Research Center, Inc.
City
Buena Park
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
90620
Country
United States
Facility Name
Providence Clinical Research
City
Burbank
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
91505
Country
United States
Facility Name
Synergy Clinical Research
City
Escondido
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92025
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Center of Fresno, Inc.
City
Fresno
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
93726
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pacific Coast Pain Management Center
City
Laguna Hills
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92637
Country
United States
Facility Name
South Orange County Surgical Medical Group
City
Laguna Hills
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92653
Country
United States
Facility Name
Robert M. Karns, MD A Medical Corporation
City
Los Angeles
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
90036
Country
United States
Facility Name
Accelovance, Inc.
City
San Diego
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92108
Country
United States
Facility Name
Radiant Research, Inc.
City
Santa Rosa
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
95405
Country
United States
Facility Name
Bayview Research Group, LLC
City
Valley Village
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
91607
Country
United States
Facility Name
Radiant Research, Inc
City
Denver
State/Province
Colorado
ZIP/Postal Code
80239
Country
United States
Facility Name
Clinical Research of West Florida, Inc.
City
Clearwater
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33765
Country
United States
Facility Name
Avail Clinical Research, LLC
City
DeLand
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
32720
Country
United States
Facility Name
International Research Associates, LLC
City
Miami
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33183
Country
United States
Facility Name
Compass Research
City
Orlando
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
32806
Country
United States
Facility Name
Radiant Research, Inc.
City
Pinellas Park
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33781
Country
United States
Facility Name
Gold Coast Research LLC
City
Plantation
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33317
Country
United States
Facility Name
Sarasota Pain Medicine Research LLC
City
Sarasota
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
34238
Country
United States
Facility Name
Clinical Research of West Florida, Inc.
City
Tampa
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33603
Country
United States
Facility Name
Drug Studies America
City
Marietta
State/Province
Georgia
ZIP/Postal Code
30060
Country
United States
Facility Name
Georgia Institute for Clinical Research, LLC
City
Marietta
State/Province
Georgia
ZIP/Postal Code
30060
Country
United States
Facility Name
Better Health Clinical Research, Inc.
City
Newnan
State/Province
Georgia
ZIP/Postal Code
30265
Country
United States
Facility Name
Millennium Pain Center
City
Bloomington
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
61701
Country
United States
Facility Name
Medex Healthcare Research, Inc.
City
Chicago
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60603
Country
United States
Facility Name
Rehabilitation Associates of Indiana
City
Indianapolis
State/Province
Indiana
ZIP/Postal Code
46250
Country
United States
Facility Name
International Clinical Research, Inc.
City
Leawood
State/Province
Kansas
ZIP/Postal Code
66211
Country
United States
Facility Name
Community Research
City
Crestview
State/Province
Kentucky
ZIP/Postal Code
41017
Country
United States
Facility Name
The Pain Treatment Center of the Bluegrass
City
Lexington
State/Province
Kentucky
ZIP/Postal Code
40503
Country
United States
Facility Name
Horizon Research Group, LLC
City
Baton Rouge
State/Province
Louisiana
ZIP/Postal Code
70809
Country
United States
Facility Name
WK River Cities Clinical Research Center
City
Shreveport
State/Province
Louisiana
ZIP/Postal Code
71105
Country
United States
Facility Name
MidAtlantic Pain Medicine Center
City
Pikesville
State/Province
Maryland
ZIP/Postal Code
21208
Country
United States
Facility Name
Beacon Clinical Research, LLC
City
Brockton
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
02301
Country
United States
Facility Name
HealthCare Research
City
Florissant
State/Province
Missouri
ZIP/Postal Code
63031
Country
United States
Facility Name
Medex Healthcare Research Inc.
City
Saint Louis
State/Province
Missouri
ZIP/Postal Code
63117
Country
United States
Facility Name
Sundance Clinical Research, LLC
City
Saint Louis
State/Province
Missouri
ZIP/Postal Code
63141
Country
United States
Facility Name
Meridian Clinical Research
City
Omaha
State/Province
Nebraska
ZIP/Postal Code
68134
Country
United States
Facility Name
Clinical Research Center of Nevada
City
Las Vegas
State/Province
Nevada
ZIP/Postal Code
89104
Country
United States
Facility Name
Advanced Pain Consultants
City
Voorhees
State/Province
New Jersey
ZIP/Postal Code
08043
Country
United States
Facility Name
Upstate Clinical Research Associates
City
Williamsville
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
14221
Country
United States
Facility Name
Wake Research Associates
City
Raleigh
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27612
Country
United States
Facility Name
Radiant Research, Inc
City
Akron
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
44311
Country
United States
Facility Name
Sterling Research Group, Ltd.
City
Cincinnati
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
45219
Country
United States
Facility Name
Community Research, Inc
City
Cincinnati
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
45227
Country
United States
Facility Name
Community Research, Inc
City
Cincinnati
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
45245
Country
United States
Facility Name
Rapid Medical Research
City
Cleveland
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
44122
Country
United States
Facility Name
Columbus Clinical Research
City
Columbus
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
43213
Country
United States
Facility Name
SP Research
City
Oklahoma City
State/Province
Oklahoma
ZIP/Postal Code
73112
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pain Research of Oregon
City
Eugene
State/Province
Oregon
ZIP/Postal Code
97401
Country
United States
Facility Name
Summit Research Network Inc.
City
Portland
State/Province
Oregon
ZIP/Postal Code
97210
Country
United States
Facility Name
Brandywine Clinical Research
City
Downingtown
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
19335
Country
United States
Facility Name
Tipton Medical and Diagnostic Center
City
Tipton
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
16684
Country
United States
Facility Name
AMH Feasterville Family Health Care Center
City
Trevose
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
19053
Country
United States
Facility Name
Clinical Research Center of Reading
City
Wyomissing
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
19610
Country
United States
Facility Name
Omega Medical Research
City
Warwick
State/Province
Rhode Island
ZIP/Postal Code
02886
Country
United States
Facility Name
Radiant Research Inc.
City
Anderson
State/Province
South Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
29621
Country
United States
Facility Name
Greenville Pharmaceutical Research
City
Greenville
State/Province
South Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
29615
Country
United States
Facility Name
Radiant Research, Inc
City
Greer
State/Province
South Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
29651
Country
United States
Facility Name
Trident Institute of Medical Research, LLC
City
North Charleston
State/Province
South Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
29406
Country
United States
Facility Name
South Carolina Pharmaceutical Research
City
Spartanburg
State/Province
South Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
29303
Country
United States
Facility Name
KRK Medical Research
City
Dallas
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
75230
Country
United States
Facility Name
Radiant Research Dallas
City
Dallas
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
75231
Country
United States
Facility Name
Renaissance Clinical Research & Hypertension of Texas, PLLC
City
Dallas
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
75235
Country
United States
Facility Name
Medstar Clinical Research
City
Houston
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
77083
Country
United States
Facility Name
Benchmark Research
City
San Angelo
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
76904
Country
United States
Facility Name
DCT-Sugarland, LLC
City
Sugar Land
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
77478
Country
United States
Facility Name
Hillcrest Family Health Centers
City
Waco
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
76710
Country
United States
Facility Name
Aspen Clinical Research, LLC
City
Orem
State/Province
Utah
ZIP/Postal Code
84058
Country
United States
Facility Name
Lifetree Clinical Research
City
Salt Lake City
State/Province
Utah
ZIP/Postal Code
84106
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Hydrocodone Bitartrate Extended-Release Tablets (CEP-33237) for Relief of Moderate to Severe Pain in Patients With Osteoarthritis or Low Back Pain Who Require Opioid Treatment for an Extended Period of Time

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs