search
Back to results

Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Placulumab (CEP-37247) Administered by the Transforaminal Epidural Route for the Treatment of Patients With Lumbosacral Radicular Pain Associated With Disk Herniation

Primary Purpose

Sciatica

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 1
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
CEP-37247
Placebo
Sponsored by
Cephalon
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Sciatica focused on measuring Sciatica, Pain

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 70 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Over the 4 days prior to the randomization visit, the patient has a mean score greater than or equal to 5 (of 10) for "Average Pain Over the Past 24 Hours" for the pain in the affected leg as assessed by the 11-Point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS-11) captured in the electronic diaries. The patient must have valid (non-missing) data for at least 3 out of the 4 days, and the mean score must be at least 5 without rounding.
  • The patient has a current diagnosis of lumbosacral radicular pain. Pain must radiate into the leg in a dermatomal/myotomal distribution consistent with the diagnosis of lumbosacral radicular pain in the suspected involved nerve root. Based on history and medical records (if available), the duration of the current episode of pain must be between 6 and 52 weeks duration.
  • Diagnosis must be confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (or existing computed tomography [CT] or MRI related to the symptoms present at screening) performed within 6 months prior to screening and demonstrating disk herniation at a location consistent with the clinical symptoms of radicular pain. Other incidental pathology is permitted as long as it is asymptomatic and believed not causal of the primary diagnosis of lumbosacral radicular pain at the specific spinal level as described below.
  • The patient must have at least 1 of the following: a positive straight leg raise (L5-S1), positive femoral stretch test (L3-L4), or other positive test result upon physical examination that is consistent with the presence of nerve root irritation at the nerve root suspected to be involved in the diagnosed lumbosacral radicular pain at screening.
  • Herniation must affect L3-L4, L4-L5, or L5-S1 and must be consistent with clinical presentation of the current episode of lumbosacral radicular pain as described above.
  • Patients with significant or progressive sensory impairment or motor impairment (such as foot drop) must be assessed on a case-by-case basis by the investigator, and must in each case receive written approval of the Sponsor prior to randomization.
  • There must be confirmation that the patient does not have an active tuberculosis infection at screening. The patient should have either a negative QuantiFERON®-TB Gold blood test or negative tuberculin skin test (TST) result at screening; however if QuantiFERON®-TB Gold test or TST is positive, a chest radiogram may be used to determine whether a patient has an active infection.
  • The patient is willing to keep all analgesic medication and other therapy usage (such as physiotherapy, acupuncture, or transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation [TENS]) stable or decreased during the study and use only the rescue pain medication as needed and as specified by the protocol.
  • The patient is in good health (with the exception of the condition under study) as determined by a medical and psychiatric history, medical examination, ECG, serum chemistry, hematology, urinalysis, and serology.
  • Women of childbearing potential (ie, not surgically sterile or 2 years postmenopausal), must use a medically accepted method of contraception and must agree to continue use of this method for the duration of the study and for 30 days after participation in the study, and have a negative pregnancy test at screening.

Exclusion Criteria:

The patient:

  • has a documented history of an allergic reaction (hives, rash, etc.) or a clinically significant intolerance to study drug or ingredients.
  • has a body mass index (BMI) greater than 40 kg/m2.
  • the patient has an established history of a major psychiatric disorder, not controlled with medication or appears to have anxiety that would interfere with clinical pain scores or participation in the trial.
  • has clinically significant abnormalities in clinical chemistry, hematology or urinalysis, including serum glutamic-oxaloacetic transaminase/aspartate aminotransferase (AST) or serum glutamic-pyruvic transaminase/alanine aminotransferase (ALT) greater than or equal to 3 times the upper limit of the reference range or an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) less than or equal to 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 (Modification of Diet in Renal Disease [MDRD] study formula) at screening.
  • has received an intra-epidural steroid injection for the treatment of the current episode of sciatica during the last 3 months prior to screening.
  • has significant pain unrelated to the disk herniation that would significantly compromise assessment of the radicular back and leg pain related to the disk herniation.
  • has radiologic evidence of disk herniation at more than 1 spinal level, and clinical evidence of lumbosacral radicular pain at more than 1 spinal nerve corresponding to the levels of the multiple disk herniations.
  • has received any investigational drug within 30 days prior to screening, or is scheduled to receive an investigational drug other than blinded study drug during the course of this study.
  • has had lumbar or sacral back surgery related to the specific disk that is the cause of the radicular pain upon presentation to the study, or currently plans to undergo spine surgical intervention while in the study.
  • has received epidural corticosteroid injections in the back within 3 months of screening.
  • is involved in an ongoing worker's compensation claim, disability claim, or litigation related to any pain problem.
  • has any active infection that is not self-limiting and not resolved prior to study drug administration.
  • has a history of malignancy or evidence of malignancy or lymphoproliferative or neoplastic disease with the exception of successfully treated basal or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin or cervical intraepithelial neoplasia within 5 years of the screening visit.
  • has a history of systemic fungal infection.
  • has a history of opportunistic infection within 3 months prior to screening.
  • has a history of known or suspected chronic infection, tuberculosis, hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV), or Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV). The investigator will review all medical history (including medication history), and patients found to be HIV positive based on medical review are to be excluded from the study.
  • has a history of any demyelinating disease, including multiple sclerosis and optic neuritis.
  • has used anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) receptor medication (anakinra [KINERET®, Biovitrum]) or anti-TNF medication (etanercept [ENBREL®, Amgen Inc.], infliximab [REMICADE®, Centocor Ortho Biotech Inc.], or adalimumab [HUMIRA®, Abbott Laboratories], or any experimental TNF inhibitor) within the past year.
  • has a planned joint replacement surgery or a history of infected joint prosthesis or has received antibiotics for a suspected infection of a joint prosthesis if that prosthesis has not been removed or replaced.
  • has been given live vaccines within 14 days of study drug administration.
  • has severe spinal stenosis or spondylolisthesis (grade 2 or higher).
  • has coagulopathy.
  • is a pregnant or lactating woman (any women becoming pregnant during the study will be withdrawn from the study).
  • has a history of diabetic neuropathy or peripheral neuropathy in the lower extremities.
  • has a history of any condition (not otherwise specified) known to be amenable to TNF inhibitors (e.g., Crohn's disease).
  • has a known allergy or idiosyncratic (atopic) reaction to contrast agent, local anesthetic, study drug, any ingredient listed as being present in a study formulation, or any other pain management compound likely to be prescribed in the study, including their metabolites (if applicable) or any ingredient listed as being present in their formulations.
  • has any clinically significant uncontrolled medical condition (treated or untreated).

Sites / Locations

  • Teva Investigational Site 22
  • Teva Investigational Site 18
  • Teva Investigational Site 19
  • Teva Investigational Site 2
  • Teva Investigational Site 14
  • Teva Investigational Site 5
  • Teva Investigational Site 10
  • Teva Investigational Site 13
  • Teva Investigational Site 9
  • Teva Investigational Site 15
  • Teva Investigational Site 8
  • Teva Investigational Site 20
  • Teva Investigational Site 16
  • Teva Investigational Site 21
  • Teva Investigational Site 17
  • Teva Investigational Site 1
  • Teva Investigational Site 11
  • Teva Investigational Site 6
  • Teva Investigational Site 4
  • Teva Investigational Site 3
  • Teva Investigational Site 103
  • Teva Investigational Site 102
  • Teva Investigational Site 100
  • Teva Investigational Site 101

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Placebo Comparator

Arm Label

CEP-37247

Matching placebo

Arm Description

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Occurrence of adverse events compared to placebo
Mean change in the weekly average of daily average pain intensity (API) in the affected leg on the 11-Point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS-11)
The average pain intensity over the past 24 hours on the NRS-11 will be collected daily by electronic diary.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Weekly average of daily leg API score as assessed by the NRS-11 from electronic diary entries
Evaluate the efficacy of each dose of CEP-37247 as compared with placebo within each individual dose group and with the combined placebo group.
Weekly average of daily back API score as assessed by the NRS-11 from electronic diary entries
Evaluate the efficacy of each dose of CEP-37247 as compared with placebo within each individual dose group and with the combined placebo group.
Weekly average of daily worst leg pain score as assessed by the NRS-11 from electronic diary entries
Evaluate the efficacy of each dose of CEP-37247 as compared with placebo within each individual dose group and with the combined placebo group.
Weekly average of daily worst back pain score as assessed by the NRS-11 from electronic diary entries
Evaluate the efficacy of each dose of CEP-37247 as compared with placebo within each individual dose group and with the combined placebo group.
Patients with 30% and 50% reductions in average pain over the previous 24 hours as measured by the Brief Pain Inventory Short Form (BPI-SF)
Evaluate the efficacy of each dose of CEP-37247 as compared with placebo within each individual dose group and with the combined placebo group.
Change in total Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score as well as subscale scores
Evaluate the efficacy of each dose of CEP-37247 as compared with placebo within each individual dose group and with the combined placebo group.
Score on the Patient Global Impression of Change
Evaluate the efficacy of each dose of CEP-37247 as compared with placebo within each individual dose group and with the combined placebo group.
Change in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) score
Evaluate the efficacy of each dose of CEP-37247 as compared with placebo within each individual dose group and with the combined placebo group.
Average daily amount of rescue medication used
Evaluate the efficacy of each dose of CEP-37247 as compared with placebo within each individual dose group and with the combined placebo group.
Patients requiring a subsequent injection of epidural steroids
Evaluate the efficacy of each dose of CEP-37247 as compared with placebo within each individual dose group and with the combined placebo group.
Patients requiring back surgery
Evaluate the efficacy of each dose of CEP-37247 as compared with placebo within each individual dose group and with the combined placebo group.
Evaluate the safety of CEP-37247 treatment as assessed by vital signs measurements
Evaluate the safety of CEP-37247 treatment as assessed by electrocardiogram (ECG) results
Evaluate the safety of CEP-37247 treatment as assessed by clinical laboratory tests
Evaluate the safety of CEP-37247 treatment as assessed by physical examination
Evaluate the safety of CEP-37247 treatment as assessed by neurologic examination
Evaluate the safety of CEP-37247 treatment as assessed by concomitant medication usage
Evaluate the safety of CEP-37247 treatment as assessed by immunogenicity tests
Characterize the serum pharmacokinetics of CEP-37247 following epidural administration

Full Information

First Posted
November 10, 2010
Last Updated
July 19, 2016
Sponsor
Cephalon
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01240876
Brief Title
Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Placulumab (CEP-37247) Administered by the Transforaminal Epidural Route for the Treatment of Patients With Lumbosacral Radicular Pain Associated With Disk Herniation
Official Title
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Ascending-Dose Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of CEP-37247 Administered at Single Doses of 0.5, 1, 3, 6, or 12 mg by the Transforaminal Epidural Route for the Treatment of Patients With Lumbosacral Radicular Pain Associated With Disk Herniation
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
July 2016
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
January 2011 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
March 2013 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
April 2013 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Cephalon

4. Oversight

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of CEP-37247 compared with placebo as assessed by the occurrence of adverse events, and the mean change in average pain intensity (API) in the affected leg.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Sciatica
Keywords
Sciatica, Pain

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 1, Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
98 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
CEP-37247
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Title
Matching placebo
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
CEP-37247
Other Intervention Name(s)
placulumab
Intervention Description
0.5-, 1-, 3-, 6-, and 12-mg doses of CEP-37247 will be administered by the transforaminal epidural route.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Placebo
Intervention Description
Matching placebo vials will be filled with the buffered solution for CEP-37247.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Occurrence of adverse events compared to placebo
Time Frame
throughout the 28-week double-blind treatment period
Title
Mean change in the weekly average of daily average pain intensity (API) in the affected leg on the 11-Point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS-11)
Description
The average pain intensity over the past 24 hours on the NRS-11 will be collected daily by electronic diary.
Time Frame
at week 4 compared with baseline
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Weekly average of daily leg API score as assessed by the NRS-11 from electronic diary entries
Description
Evaluate the efficacy of each dose of CEP-37247 as compared with placebo within each individual dose group and with the combined placebo group.
Time Frame
at each of the first 6 weeks
Title
Weekly average of daily back API score as assessed by the NRS-11 from electronic diary entries
Description
Evaluate the efficacy of each dose of CEP-37247 as compared with placebo within each individual dose group and with the combined placebo group.
Time Frame
at each of the first 6 weeks
Title
Weekly average of daily worst leg pain score as assessed by the NRS-11 from electronic diary entries
Description
Evaluate the efficacy of each dose of CEP-37247 as compared with placebo within each individual dose group and with the combined placebo group.
Time Frame
at each of the first 6 weeks
Title
Weekly average of daily worst back pain score as assessed by the NRS-11 from electronic diary entries
Description
Evaluate the efficacy of each dose of CEP-37247 as compared with placebo within each individual dose group and with the combined placebo group.
Time Frame
at each of the first 6 weeks
Title
Patients with 30% and 50% reductions in average pain over the previous 24 hours as measured by the Brief Pain Inventory Short Form (BPI-SF)
Description
Evaluate the efficacy of each dose of CEP-37247 as compared with placebo within each individual dose group and with the combined placebo group.
Time Frame
at 1, 2, 4, 6, 14, and 28 weeks
Title
Change in total Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score as well as subscale scores
Description
Evaluate the efficacy of each dose of CEP-37247 as compared with placebo within each individual dose group and with the combined placebo group.
Time Frame
at 1, 2, 4, 6, 14, and 28 weeks
Title
Score on the Patient Global Impression of Change
Description
Evaluate the efficacy of each dose of CEP-37247 as compared with placebo within each individual dose group and with the combined placebo group.
Time Frame
at 1, 2, 4, 6, 14, and 28 weeks
Title
Change in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) score
Description
Evaluate the efficacy of each dose of CEP-37247 as compared with placebo within each individual dose group and with the combined placebo group.
Time Frame
from baseline to weeks 4, 14, and 28
Title
Average daily amount of rescue medication used
Description
Evaluate the efficacy of each dose of CEP-37247 as compared with placebo within each individual dose group and with the combined placebo group.
Time Frame
during each of the first 6 weeks of the 28-week double-blind treatment period
Title
Patients requiring a subsequent injection of epidural steroids
Description
Evaluate the efficacy of each dose of CEP-37247 as compared with placebo within each individual dose group and with the combined placebo group.
Time Frame
up to 28 weeks after CEP-37247 treatment
Title
Patients requiring back surgery
Description
Evaluate the efficacy of each dose of CEP-37247 as compared with placebo within each individual dose group and with the combined placebo group.
Time Frame
up to 28 weeks after CEP-37247 treatment
Title
Evaluate the safety of CEP-37247 treatment as assessed by vital signs measurements
Time Frame
at weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 14, and 28 (or early termination)
Title
Evaluate the safety of CEP-37247 treatment as assessed by electrocardiogram (ECG) results
Time Frame
at week 4
Title
Evaluate the safety of CEP-37247 treatment as assessed by clinical laboratory tests
Time Frame
at weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 14, and 28 (or early termination)
Title
Evaluate the safety of CEP-37247 treatment as assessed by physical examination
Time Frame
at weeks 4 and 28 (or early termination)
Title
Evaluate the safety of CEP-37247 treatment as assessed by neurologic examination
Time Frame
at weeks 1, 2, 4 and 28 (or early termination)
Title
Evaluate the safety of CEP-37247 treatment as assessed by concomitant medication usage
Time Frame
throughout the 28-week double-blind treatment period
Title
Evaluate the safety of CEP-37247 treatment as assessed by immunogenicity tests
Time Frame
at weeks 2, 4, 6, 14, and 28 (or early termination)
Title
Characterize the serum pharmacokinetics of CEP-37247 following epidural administration
Time Frame
Throughout the 28-week double-blind treatment period

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
70 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Over the 4 days prior to the randomization visit, the patient has a mean score greater than or equal to 5 (of 10) for "Average Pain Over the Past 24 Hours" for the pain in the affected leg as assessed by the 11-Point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS-11) captured in the electronic diaries. The patient must have valid (non-missing) data for at least 3 out of the 4 days, and the mean score must be at least 5 without rounding. The patient has a current diagnosis of lumbosacral radicular pain. Pain must radiate into the leg in a dermatomal/myotomal distribution consistent with the diagnosis of lumbosacral radicular pain in the suspected involved nerve root. Based on history and medical records (if available), the duration of the current episode of pain must be between 6 and 52 weeks duration. Diagnosis must be confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (or existing computed tomography [CT] or MRI related to the symptoms present at screening) performed within 6 months prior to screening and demonstrating disk herniation at a location consistent with the clinical symptoms of radicular pain. Other incidental pathology is permitted as long as it is asymptomatic and believed not causal of the primary diagnosis of lumbosacral radicular pain at the specific spinal level as described below. The patient must have at least 1 of the following: a positive straight leg raise (L5-S1), positive femoral stretch test (L3-L4), or other positive test result upon physical examination that is consistent with the presence of nerve root irritation at the nerve root suspected to be involved in the diagnosed lumbosacral radicular pain at screening. Herniation must affect L3-L4, L4-L5, or L5-S1 and must be consistent with clinical presentation of the current episode of lumbosacral radicular pain as described above. Patients with significant or progressive sensory impairment or motor impairment (such as foot drop) must be assessed on a case-by-case basis by the investigator, and must in each case receive written approval of the Sponsor prior to randomization. There must be confirmation that the patient does not have an active tuberculosis infection at screening. The patient should have either a negative QuantiFERON®-TB Gold blood test or negative tuberculin skin test (TST) result at screening; however if QuantiFERON®-TB Gold test or TST is positive, a chest radiogram may be used to determine whether a patient has an active infection. The patient is willing to keep all analgesic medication and other therapy usage (such as physiotherapy, acupuncture, or transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation [TENS]) stable or decreased during the study and use only the rescue pain medication as needed and as specified by the protocol. The patient is in good health (with the exception of the condition under study) as determined by a medical and psychiatric history, medical examination, ECG, serum chemistry, hematology, urinalysis, and serology. Women of childbearing potential (ie, not surgically sterile or 2 years postmenopausal), must use a medically accepted method of contraception and must agree to continue use of this method for the duration of the study and for 30 days after participation in the study, and have a negative pregnancy test at screening. Exclusion Criteria: The patient: has a documented history of an allergic reaction (hives, rash, etc.) or a clinically significant intolerance to study drug or ingredients. has a body mass index (BMI) greater than 40 kg/m2. the patient has an established history of a major psychiatric disorder, not controlled with medication or appears to have anxiety that would interfere with clinical pain scores or participation in the trial. has clinically significant abnormalities in clinical chemistry, hematology or urinalysis, including serum glutamic-oxaloacetic transaminase/aspartate aminotransferase (AST) or serum glutamic-pyruvic transaminase/alanine aminotransferase (ALT) greater than or equal to 3 times the upper limit of the reference range or an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) less than or equal to 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 (Modification of Diet in Renal Disease [MDRD] study formula) at screening. has received an intra-epidural steroid injection for the treatment of the current episode of sciatica during the last 3 months prior to screening. has significant pain unrelated to the disk herniation that would significantly compromise assessment of the radicular back and leg pain related to the disk herniation. has radiologic evidence of disk herniation at more than 1 spinal level, and clinical evidence of lumbosacral radicular pain at more than 1 spinal nerve corresponding to the levels of the multiple disk herniations. has received any investigational drug within 30 days prior to screening, or is scheduled to receive an investigational drug other than blinded study drug during the course of this study. has had lumbar or sacral back surgery related to the specific disk that is the cause of the radicular pain upon presentation to the study, or currently plans to undergo spine surgical intervention while in the study. has received epidural corticosteroid injections in the back within 3 months of screening. is involved in an ongoing worker's compensation claim, disability claim, or litigation related to any pain problem. has any active infection that is not self-limiting and not resolved prior to study drug administration. has a history of malignancy or evidence of malignancy or lymphoproliferative or neoplastic disease with the exception of successfully treated basal or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin or cervical intraepithelial neoplasia within 5 years of the screening visit. has a history of systemic fungal infection. has a history of opportunistic infection within 3 months prior to screening. has a history of known or suspected chronic infection, tuberculosis, hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV), or Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV). The investigator will review all medical history (including medication history), and patients found to be HIV positive based on medical review are to be excluded from the study. has a history of any demyelinating disease, including multiple sclerosis and optic neuritis. has used anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) receptor medication (anakinra [KINERET®, Biovitrum]) or anti-TNF medication (etanercept [ENBREL®, Amgen Inc.], infliximab [REMICADE®, Centocor Ortho Biotech Inc.], or adalimumab [HUMIRA®, Abbott Laboratories], or any experimental TNF inhibitor) within the past year. has a planned joint replacement surgery or a history of infected joint prosthesis or has received antibiotics for a suspected infection of a joint prosthesis if that prosthesis has not been removed or replaced. has been given live vaccines within 14 days of study drug administration. has severe spinal stenosis or spondylolisthesis (grade 2 or higher). has coagulopathy. is a pregnant or lactating woman (any women becoming pregnant during the study will be withdrawn from the study). has a history of diabetic neuropathy or peripheral neuropathy in the lower extremities. has a history of any condition (not otherwise specified) known to be amenable to TNF inhibitors (e.g., Crohn's disease). has a known allergy or idiosyncratic (atopic) reaction to contrast agent, local anesthetic, study drug, any ingredient listed as being present in a study formulation, or any other pain management compound likely to be prescribed in the study, including their metabolites (if applicable) or any ingredient listed as being present in their formulations. has any clinically significant uncontrolled medical condition (treated or untreated).
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Sponsor's Medical Expert, Associate Director, Clinical Research, MD, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Cephalon
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 22
City
La Mesa
State/Province
California
Country
United States
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 18
City
Laguna Hills
State/Province
California
Country
United States
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 19
City
Pasadena
State/Province
California
Country
United States
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 2
City
Pasadena
State/Province
California
Country
United States
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 14
City
Orlando
State/Province
Florida
Country
United States
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 5
City
Sarasota
State/Province
Florida
Country
United States
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 10
City
Marietta
State/Province
Georgia
Country
United States
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 13
City
Marietta
State/Province
Georgia
Country
United States
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 9
City
Bloomington
State/Province
Illinois
Country
United States
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 15
City
Overland Park
State/Province
Kansas
Country
United States
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 8
City
Shreveport
State/Province
Louisiana
Country
United States
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 20
City
Winston-Salem
State/Province
North Carolina
Country
United States
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 16
City
Dayton
State/Province
Ohio
Country
United States
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 21
City
Eugene
State/Province
Oregon
Country
United States
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 17
City
Altoona
State/Province
Pennsylvania
Country
United States
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 1
City
Greenville
State/Province
South Carolina
Country
United States
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 11
City
North Charleston
State/Province
South Carolina
Country
United States
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 6
City
Spartanburg
State/Province
South Carolina
Country
United States
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 4
City
Orem
State/Province
Utah
Country
United States
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 3
City
Salt Lake City
State/Province
Utah
Country
United States
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 103
City
Caulfied South
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 102
City
Malvern East
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 100
City
North Terrace
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Teva Investigational Site 101
City
St. Leonards
Country
Australia

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Placulumab (CEP-37247) Administered by the Transforaminal Epidural Route for the Treatment of Patients With Lumbosacral Radicular Pain Associated With Disk Herniation

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs