search
Back to results

A Study of Adalimumab in Japanese Subjects With Intestinal Behçet's Disease

Primary Purpose

Intestinal Behçet's Disease

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
Japan
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Adalimumab
Sponsored by
AbbVie (prior sponsor, Abbott)
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Intestinal Behçet's Disease focused on measuring Behçet's, intestinal

Eligibility Criteria

15 Years - undefined (Child, Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Intestinal Behçet's disease
  • Patients with typical ulcer at ileocecal region
  • Patients who have failed conventional treatment

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Crohn's disease
  • History of ileocecal resection
  • History of tuberculosis (TB)
  • Female subject who is pregnant or breast-feeding or considering becoming pregnant during the study

Sites / Locations

  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 46738
  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 46723
  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 46728
  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 46725
  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 46730
  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 46722
  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 46726
  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 59578
  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 46724
  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 46729
  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 46737
  • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 46733

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm Type

Experimental

Arm Label

Adalimumab

Arm Description

Adalimumab 160 mg at Week 0, 80 mg at Week 2 and 40 mg every other week (eow) starting at Week 4 to Week 50, subcutaneous injection. After Week 52, participants could continue the treatment with 40 mg eow until the day before approval of adalimumab for intestinal Behçet's disease in Japan.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Number of Participants With Marked Improvement at Week 24
Marked improvement is defined as the combination of both global assessment of gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms and endoscopic improvement grades of ≤1. Global assessment of GI symptoms is a participant-assessed, investigator-confirmed grading of global symptoms from 0 to 4: 0=free of symptoms; 1=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks but did not affect participant's daily life; 2=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks and slightly affected participant's daily life; 3=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks and affected participant's daily life; 4=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks and critically affected participant's daily life. Endoscopic improvement was assessed in 4 grades compared to the screening endoscopy based on the longest diameter (none, ≥1 cm to <2 cm, ≥2 cm to <3 cm, ≥3 cm) of ileocecal largest open ulcer (area of mucosal defect). Grades are: 0=healing; 1=marked reduction (reduction to ≤1/4); 2=reduction (reduction to ≤1/2 - 1/4); 3=no change or worse (reduction less than 1/2 or expansion).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Number of Participants With Marked Improvement at Week 52
Marked improvement is defined as the combination of both global assessment of gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms and endoscopic improvement grades of ≤1. Global assessment of GI symptoms is a participant-assessed, investigator-confirmed grading of global symptoms from 0 to 4: 0=free of symptoms; 1=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks but did not affect participant's daily life; 2=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks and slightly affected participant's daily life; 3=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks and affected participant's daily life; 4=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks and critically affected participant's daily life. Endoscopic improvement was assessed in 4 grades compared to the screening endoscopy based on the longest diameter (none, ≥1 cm to <2 cm, ≥2 cm to <3 cm, ≥3 cm) of ileocecal largest open ulcer (area of mucosal defect). Grades are: 0=healing; 1=marked reduction (reduction to ≤1/4); 2=reduction (reduction to ≤1/2 - 1/4); 3=no change or worse (reduction less than 1/2 or expansion).
Number of Participants With Complete Remission at Week 24 and Week 52
Complete remission was defined as both endoscopic improvement and global assessment of gastrointestinal symptoms grades of 0. Endoscopic improvement was assessed in 4 grades compared to the screening (baseline) endoscopy based on the longest diameter (none, ≥1 cm to <2 cm, ≥2 cm to <3 cm, ≥3 cm) of ileocecal largest open ulcer (area of mucosal defect). Grades are: 0=healing; 1=marked reduction (reduction to ≤1/4); 2=reduction (reduction to ≤1/2 - 1/4); 3=no change or worse (reduction less than 1/2 or expansion). Global assessment of gastrointestinal symptoms is a participant-assessed, investigator-confirmed grading of global symptoms from 0 to 4: 0=free of symptoms; 1=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks but did not affect participant's daily life; 2=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks and slightly affected participant's daily life; 3=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks and affected participant's daily life; 4=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks and critically affected participant's daily life.
Number of Participants With a Global Assessment of Gastrointestinal Symptoms Grade 0 or ≤1 and Improvement of ≥1 Grade at Week 24 and Week 52
Study participants completed a global assessment of their gastrointestinal symptoms (Behçet's disease symptoms other than gastrointestinal symptoms were excluded) during 2 weeks before assessment visit on a 5-grade scale. The investigator confirmed this assessment via interview with participants. Assessment is graded from 0 to 4: 0=free of symptoms; 1=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks but did not affect participant's daily life; 2=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks and slightly affected participant's daily life; 3=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks and affected participant's daily life; 4=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks and critically affected participant's daily life. Global assessment of grade 0 or ≤1 and improvement of ≥1 (from baseline) is presented.
Number of Participants With Endoscopic Improvement Grades 0, ≤1 and ≤2 at Week 24 and Week 52
Endoscopic improvement was assessed in 4 grades compared to the screening (baseline) endoscopy based on the longest diameter (none, ≥1 cm to <2 cm, ≥2 cm to <3 cm, ≥3 cm) of ileocecal largest open ulcer (area of mucosal defect). Grades are: 0=healing; 1=marked reduction (reduction to ≤1/4); 2=reduction (reduction to ≤1/2 - 1/4); 3=no change or worse (reduction less than 1/2 or expansion).
Number of Participants With Abdominal Pain, Diarrhea and Other Gastrointestinal (GI) Symptoms Grade ≤1 and Improvement of ≥1 Grade at Week 24 and Week 52
Participants assessed their abdominal pain, diarrhea and other gastrointestinal symptoms (abdominal discomfort, abdominal fullness, etc) during 2 weeks before assessment visit in 5 grades. Investigator confirmed the assessment through interview with participants. Assessment is graded from 0 to 4: 0=free of symptoms; 1=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks but did not affect participant's daily life; 2=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks and slightly affected participant's daily life; 3=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks and affected participant's daily life; 4=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks and critically affected participant's daily life. Improvement of ≥1 grade from baseline is also presented.
Number of Participants With Resolution of Behçet's Disease Symptoms (Other Than Gastrointestinal Symptoms) at Week 24 and Week 52
Investigators assessed oral aphthous (mouth ulcers), skin symptoms, eye symptoms and vulval (genital) ulcers during 4 weeks before study visit via participant interview, using the following grades. Oral aphthous: 0=None; 1=Symptom existed less than 2 weeks in recent 4 weeks; 2=Symptom existed 2 weeks or more in recent 4 weeks; 3=Symptom existed mostly in recent 4 weeks. Skin (Erythema nodosum rash): 0=None; 1=Symptom existed less than 2 weeks in recent 4 weeks; 2=Symptom existed 2 weeks or more in recent 4 weeks; 3=Symptom existed mostly in recent 4 weeks. Eye (Uveitis): 0=None; 1=one eye crisis in recent 4 weeks; 2=two eye crises in recent 4 weeks; 3=three eye crises in recent 4 weeks. Vulval (genital) ulcer: 0=None; 1=Symptom existed less than 2 weeks in recent 4 weeks; 2=Symptom existed 2 weeks or more in recent 4 weeks; 3=Symptom existed mostly in recent 4 weeks. Resolution was defined as: Behçet's disease symptoms other than gastrointestinal symptoms were graded 0 (disappeared).
Mean Change From Baseline in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) at Week 24 and Week 52
Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) is the standard questionnaire to assess the quality of life of patients with inflammatory bowel disease. The IBDQ is a 32-item questionnaire consisting of 4 dimensions: bowel-related symptoms, systemic function, social function and emotional status. The responses to each question within each domain range from 1 (significant impairment) to 7 (no impairment), with total score ranging from 32 (very poor) to 224 (perfect health-related quality of life).
Mean Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 (SF-36) Summary Scores at Week 24 and Week 52
The Short-Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey is a comprehensive quality of life scale. An increase in SF-36 score indicates alleviation of the disease and a decrease in score indicates aggravation of disease. The physical component reflects activity level, activity limitations, pain and rating of one's health. Score on the physical component ranges from 0 (poorest health) to 100 (best health). The mental component reflects vitality, social functioning, role-emotional and mental health. Score on the mental component ranges from 0 (poorest health) to 100 (best health).
Median Change From Baseline in C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Week 24 and Week 52
C-Reactive Protein (CRP) normal range was defined as ≤0.3 mg/dL.

Full Information

First Posted
November 17, 2010
Last Updated
June 27, 2014
Sponsor
AbbVie (prior sponsor, Abbott)
Collaborators
Eisai Co., Ltd.
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01243671
Brief Title
A Study of Adalimumab in Japanese Subjects With Intestinal Behçet's Disease
Official Title
A Multi-Center Study of Adalimumab in Japanese Subjects With Intestinal Behçet's Disease
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
June 2014
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
October 2010 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
March 2012 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
June 2013 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
AbbVie (prior sponsor, Abbott)
Collaborators
Eisai Co., Ltd.

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
To investigate efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics of adalimumab subcutaneous (sc) for Japanese subjects with intestinal Behçet's disease who are refractory to conventional therapies.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Intestinal Behçet's Disease
Keywords
Behçet's, intestinal

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Non-Randomized
Enrollment
20 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Adalimumab
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Adalimumab 160 mg at Week 0, 80 mg at Week 2 and 40 mg every other week (eow) starting at Week 4 to Week 50, subcutaneous injection. After Week 52, participants could continue the treatment with 40 mg eow until the day before approval of adalimumab for intestinal Behçet's disease in Japan.
Intervention Type
Biological
Intervention Name(s)
Adalimumab
Other Intervention Name(s)
ABT-D2E7, Humira
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Number of Participants With Marked Improvement at Week 24
Description
Marked improvement is defined as the combination of both global assessment of gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms and endoscopic improvement grades of ≤1. Global assessment of GI symptoms is a participant-assessed, investigator-confirmed grading of global symptoms from 0 to 4: 0=free of symptoms; 1=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks but did not affect participant's daily life; 2=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks and slightly affected participant's daily life; 3=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks and affected participant's daily life; 4=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks and critically affected participant's daily life. Endoscopic improvement was assessed in 4 grades compared to the screening endoscopy based on the longest diameter (none, ≥1 cm to <2 cm, ≥2 cm to <3 cm, ≥3 cm) of ileocecal largest open ulcer (area of mucosal defect). Grades are: 0=healing; 1=marked reduction (reduction to ≤1/4); 2=reduction (reduction to ≤1/2 - 1/4); 3=no change or worse (reduction less than 1/2 or expansion).
Time Frame
24 weeks
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Number of Participants With Marked Improvement at Week 52
Description
Marked improvement is defined as the combination of both global assessment of gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms and endoscopic improvement grades of ≤1. Global assessment of GI symptoms is a participant-assessed, investigator-confirmed grading of global symptoms from 0 to 4: 0=free of symptoms; 1=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks but did not affect participant's daily life; 2=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks and slightly affected participant's daily life; 3=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks and affected participant's daily life; 4=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks and critically affected participant's daily life. Endoscopic improvement was assessed in 4 grades compared to the screening endoscopy based on the longest diameter (none, ≥1 cm to <2 cm, ≥2 cm to <3 cm, ≥3 cm) of ileocecal largest open ulcer (area of mucosal defect). Grades are: 0=healing; 1=marked reduction (reduction to ≤1/4); 2=reduction (reduction to ≤1/2 - 1/4); 3=no change or worse (reduction less than 1/2 or expansion).
Time Frame
52 weeks
Title
Number of Participants With Complete Remission at Week 24 and Week 52
Description
Complete remission was defined as both endoscopic improvement and global assessment of gastrointestinal symptoms grades of 0. Endoscopic improvement was assessed in 4 grades compared to the screening (baseline) endoscopy based on the longest diameter (none, ≥1 cm to <2 cm, ≥2 cm to <3 cm, ≥3 cm) of ileocecal largest open ulcer (area of mucosal defect). Grades are: 0=healing; 1=marked reduction (reduction to ≤1/4); 2=reduction (reduction to ≤1/2 - 1/4); 3=no change or worse (reduction less than 1/2 or expansion). Global assessment of gastrointestinal symptoms is a participant-assessed, investigator-confirmed grading of global symptoms from 0 to 4: 0=free of symptoms; 1=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks but did not affect participant's daily life; 2=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks and slightly affected participant's daily life; 3=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks and affected participant's daily life; 4=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks and critically affected participant's daily life.
Time Frame
24 weeks, 52 weeks
Title
Number of Participants With a Global Assessment of Gastrointestinal Symptoms Grade 0 or ≤1 and Improvement of ≥1 Grade at Week 24 and Week 52
Description
Study participants completed a global assessment of their gastrointestinal symptoms (Behçet's disease symptoms other than gastrointestinal symptoms were excluded) during 2 weeks before assessment visit on a 5-grade scale. The investigator confirmed this assessment via interview with participants. Assessment is graded from 0 to 4: 0=free of symptoms; 1=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks but did not affect participant's daily life; 2=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks and slightly affected participant's daily life; 3=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks and affected participant's daily life; 4=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks and critically affected participant's daily life. Global assessment of grade 0 or ≤1 and improvement of ≥1 (from baseline) is presented.
Time Frame
24 weeks, 52 weeks
Title
Number of Participants With Endoscopic Improvement Grades 0, ≤1 and ≤2 at Week 24 and Week 52
Description
Endoscopic improvement was assessed in 4 grades compared to the screening (baseline) endoscopy based on the longest diameter (none, ≥1 cm to <2 cm, ≥2 cm to <3 cm, ≥3 cm) of ileocecal largest open ulcer (area of mucosal defect). Grades are: 0=healing; 1=marked reduction (reduction to ≤1/4); 2=reduction (reduction to ≤1/2 - 1/4); 3=no change or worse (reduction less than 1/2 or expansion).
Time Frame
24 weeks, 52 weeks
Title
Number of Participants With Abdominal Pain, Diarrhea and Other Gastrointestinal (GI) Symptoms Grade ≤1 and Improvement of ≥1 Grade at Week 24 and Week 52
Description
Participants assessed their abdominal pain, diarrhea and other gastrointestinal symptoms (abdominal discomfort, abdominal fullness, etc) during 2 weeks before assessment visit in 5 grades. Investigator confirmed the assessment through interview with participants. Assessment is graded from 0 to 4: 0=free of symptoms; 1=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks but did not affect participant's daily life; 2=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks and slightly affected participant's daily life; 3=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks and affected participant's daily life; 4=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks and critically affected participant's daily life. Improvement of ≥1 grade from baseline is also presented.
Time Frame
24 weeks, 52 weeks
Title
Number of Participants With Resolution of Behçet's Disease Symptoms (Other Than Gastrointestinal Symptoms) at Week 24 and Week 52
Description
Investigators assessed oral aphthous (mouth ulcers), skin symptoms, eye symptoms and vulval (genital) ulcers during 4 weeks before study visit via participant interview, using the following grades. Oral aphthous: 0=None; 1=Symptom existed less than 2 weeks in recent 4 weeks; 2=Symptom existed 2 weeks or more in recent 4 weeks; 3=Symptom existed mostly in recent 4 weeks. Skin (Erythema nodosum rash): 0=None; 1=Symptom existed less than 2 weeks in recent 4 weeks; 2=Symptom existed 2 weeks or more in recent 4 weeks; 3=Symptom existed mostly in recent 4 weeks. Eye (Uveitis): 0=None; 1=one eye crisis in recent 4 weeks; 2=two eye crises in recent 4 weeks; 3=three eye crises in recent 4 weeks. Vulval (genital) ulcer: 0=None; 1=Symptom existed less than 2 weeks in recent 4 weeks; 2=Symptom existed 2 weeks or more in recent 4 weeks; 3=Symptom existed mostly in recent 4 weeks. Resolution was defined as: Behçet's disease symptoms other than gastrointestinal symptoms were graded 0 (disappeared).
Time Frame
24 weeks, 52 weeks
Title
Mean Change From Baseline in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) at Week 24 and Week 52
Description
Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) is the standard questionnaire to assess the quality of life of patients with inflammatory bowel disease. The IBDQ is a 32-item questionnaire consisting of 4 dimensions: bowel-related symptoms, systemic function, social function and emotional status. The responses to each question within each domain range from 1 (significant impairment) to 7 (no impairment), with total score ranging from 32 (very poor) to 224 (perfect health-related quality of life).
Time Frame
Baseline, 24 weeks, 52 weeks
Title
Mean Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 (SF-36) Summary Scores at Week 24 and Week 52
Description
The Short-Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey is a comprehensive quality of life scale. An increase in SF-36 score indicates alleviation of the disease and a decrease in score indicates aggravation of disease. The physical component reflects activity level, activity limitations, pain and rating of one's health. Score on the physical component ranges from 0 (poorest health) to 100 (best health). The mental component reflects vitality, social functioning, role-emotional and mental health. Score on the mental component ranges from 0 (poorest health) to 100 (best health).
Time Frame
Baseline, 24 weeks, 52 weeks
Title
Median Change From Baseline in C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Week 24 and Week 52
Description
C-Reactive Protein (CRP) normal range was defined as ≤0.3 mg/dL.
Time Frame
Baseline, 24 weeks, 52 weeks

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
15 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Intestinal Behçet's disease Patients with typical ulcer at ileocecal region Patients who have failed conventional treatment Exclusion Criteria: Crohn's disease History of ileocecal resection History of tuberculosis (TB) Female subject who is pregnant or breast-feeding or considering becoming pregnant during the study
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Morio Ozawa, MS
Organizational Affiliation
AbbVie GK.
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 46738
City
Chikushino
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 46723
City
Kurume
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 46728
City
Nagoya-shi
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 46725
City
Nishinomiya-shi
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 46730
City
Osaka-shi
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 46722
City
Sagamihara-shi
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 46726
City
Sakura
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 59578
City
Sapporo-shi
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 46724
City
Takatsuki-shi
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 46729
City
Tokyo
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 46737
City
Tokyo
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 46733
City
Yokohama-shi
Country
Japan

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
28670237
Citation
Inoue N, Kobayashi K, Naganuma M, Hirai F, Ozawa M, Arikan D, Huang B, Robinson AM, Thakkar RB, Hibi T. Long-term safety and efficacy of adalimumab for intestinal Behcet's disease in the open label study following a phase 3 clinical trial. Intest Res. 2017 Jul;15(3):395-401. doi: 10.5217/ir.2017.15.3.395. Epub 2017 Jun 12.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
25245624
Citation
Tanida S, Inoue N, Kobayashi K, Naganuma M, Hirai F, Iizuka B, Watanabe K, Mitsuyama K, Inoue T, Ishigatsubo Y, Suzuki Y, Nagahori M, Motoya S, Nakamura S, Arora V, Robinson AM, Thakkar RB, Hibi T. Adalimumab for the treatment of Japanese patients with intestinal Behcet's disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 May;13(5):940-8.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2014.08.042. Epub 2014 Sep 19.
Results Reference
derived
Links:
URL
http://rxabbvie.com
Description
Related info

Learn more about this trial

A Study of Adalimumab in Japanese Subjects With Intestinal Behçet's Disease

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs