search
Back to results

Perioperative Morbidity in Gyneco-oncology According to the Procedure : Coelioscopy Versus Robot-assisted Coelioscopy (ROBO-GYN)

Primary Purpose

Cervical Cancer, Uterus Cancer, Ovarian Cancer

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
France
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
gynecologic surgery - standard coelioscopy
gynecologic surgery - robot assisted coelioscopy
Sponsored by
Centre Oscar Lambret
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Cervical Cancer focused on measuring gynecology, oncology, coelioscopy, robot, morbidity

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)FemaleDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patient with uterus cancer depending on hysterectomy ± pelvic lymphadenectomy or a restadification
  • patient with cervical cancer depending on enlarged colpo-hysterectomy ± pelvic lymphadenectomy or a surgery after concomitant radiochemotherapy, or lombo aortic lymphadenectomy for a locally advanced cancer, or a restadification
  • patient with cervical cancer depending on a restadification
  • patient aged over 18 years
  • previous antitumor treatment allowed but necessarily disrupted 20 days before inclusion
  • WHO score equal or inferior to 3
  • cirrhosis-related Child-Pugh score under or equal to A7 are allowed
  • life expectancy equal or superior to 12 weeks
  • patient affiliated to health insurance
  • dated and signed informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • metastatic disease
  • pregnant or breastfeeding woman
  • patient unable to proceed follow-up visit, because of geographic, social or mental reasons

Sites / Locations

  • CHU Bordeaux, Hôpital Saint-André
  • Polyclinique Bordeaux Nord Aquitaine
  • Centre Oscar Lambret
  • CHRU Lille, Hôpital Jeanne de Flandres
  • CHU Limoges
  • Institut Paoli Calmette
  • CHU Nîmes
  • Polyclinique KenVal
  • Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou
  • Polyclinique Courlancy
  • Centre hospitalier de Roubaix
  • Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest Site René Gauducheau
  • Institut Claudius Regaud
  • CHU Rangueil
  • CHRU de Tours
  • Centre Hospitalier de Valenciennes
  • Centre Alexis Vautrin

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Experimental

Arm Label

Standard Coelioscopy

Robot-assisted coelioscopy

Arm Description

gynecologic surgery - standard coelioscopy

gynecologic surgery - robot assisted coelioscopy

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Perioperative morbidity at six months
To estimate the rate of complications within the first six months after surgery, according to the Clavien-Dindo and NCI CTCAE-v4.0 grading scales

Secondary Outcome Measures

Anesthesic and ventilator parameters
Description of anesthesic and ventilator parameters
Post-operative analgesia
collect of antalgic treatments
Surgeon's ergonomy
according to Borg and NASA-TLX scales
Patient-reported survey of patient health
36-item short form health Survey (SF36) : Scoring is a two-step process. First, numeric values of all items are recoded per the scoring key (for example, values are 0/100, or 0/25/50/75/100 depending the items). All items are scored so that a high score defines a more favorable health state. Each item is scored on a 0 to 100 range so that the lowest and highest possible scores are 0 and 100, respectively. Scores represent the percentage of total possible score achieved. In step 2, items in the same scale are averaged together to create the 8 scale scores: physical functioning, Role functioning/physical, Role functioning/emotional, Energy/fatigue, Emotional well-being, Social functioning, Pain, General health, Health change. Scale scores represent the average for all items in the scale that the respondent answered.
Description of surgical procedures
operative time (overall intervention, incision or "skin-to-skin", robot).
Progression-free survival
delay between the date of randomization and the date of the following event: local relapse, regional relapse, metastasis or death.
Anatomopathology
rate of exeresis with histologically healthy resection margins (R0), number of lymph nodes removed.

Full Information

First Posted
November 19, 2010
Last Updated
March 6, 2019
Sponsor
Centre Oscar Lambret
Collaborators
CRG : Groupe Francophone de Chirurgie Robotique en Gynécologie, National Cancer Institute, France
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01247779
Brief Title
Perioperative Morbidity in Gyneco-oncology According to the Procedure : Coelioscopy Versus Robot-assisted Coelioscopy
Acronym
ROBO-GYN
Official Title
Assessment of Perioperative Morbidity in Gyneco-oncology According to the Surgical Approach : Coelioscopy Versus Robot-assisted Coelioscopy
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
March 2019
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
December 2010 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
March 2016 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
November 2017 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Centre Oscar Lambret
Collaborators
CRG : Groupe Francophone de Chirurgie Robotique en Gynécologie, National Cancer Institute, France

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare perioperative morbidity of coelioscopy versus robot-assisted coelioscopy in cervical cancer, uterus cancer and ovarian cancer.
Detailed Description
Laparoscopic surgery, also called minimally invasive surgery (MIS), is a surgical method less invasive than classical laparoscopic open procedure. Particularly, MIS is used for resection of some gynecological cancer such as endometrial cancer, cervical cancer or ovarian cancer. Several studies demonstrated that MIS induce less surgical complications (bleeding, infections, post-operative pains...), shorter hospitalization time, earlier recovery of activity and better quality of life than laparoscopic open procedure. However, MIS is the selected method in only 9 to 25 % of gynecologic cancer surgery in France. This is likely due to the longer learning curve of MIS compared to laparoscopic open procedure. In 2001 the FDA allowed the use of robot assisted laparoscopic surgery (RALS). This technique adds some advantage to laparoscopic surgery. Indeed, surgeon operates with better precision while seated comfortably at a computer console viewing a 3-D image of the surgical field. Moreover learning curve of RALS is shorter than MIS. Comparative studies between RALS and MIS demonstrate an equivalence of these techniques for operation length and bleeding. However for surgery linked complications and time for recovery of activity, RALS had better results than MIS. Despite its expensive cost, RALS is now commonly used in North America (90% of prostatectomy and 40% of cancer linked hysterectomy). However RALS need to be evaluated in a randomized clinical trial before it's acceptation in gyneco-oncology in France. Thus, the purpose of the ROBOGYN clinical trial is to compare clinical benefit of RALS and MIS in a randomized study for patients with cancer of cervix, uterus or ovary.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Cervical Cancer, Uterus Cancer, Ovarian Cancer
Keywords
gynecology, oncology, coelioscopy, robot, morbidity

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
386 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Standard Coelioscopy
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
gynecologic surgery - standard coelioscopy
Arm Title
Robot-assisted coelioscopy
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
gynecologic surgery - robot assisted coelioscopy
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
gynecologic surgery - standard coelioscopy
Intervention Description
lymphadenectomy; hysterectomy; nerve sparing; enlarged trachelectomy; omentectomy; appendicectomy; pelvectomy
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
gynecologic surgery - robot assisted coelioscopy
Intervention Description
lymphadenectomy; hysterectomy; nerve sparing; enlarged trachelectomy; omentectomy; appendicectomy; pelvectomy
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Perioperative morbidity at six months
Description
To estimate the rate of complications within the first six months after surgery, according to the Clavien-Dindo and NCI CTCAE-v4.0 grading scales
Time Frame
six months after surgery
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Anesthesic and ventilator parameters
Description
Description of anesthesic and ventilator parameters
Time Frame
every 30 min during the surgery
Title
Post-operative analgesia
Description
collect of antalgic treatments
Time Frame
at 24h, 48h after sugery and until discharge
Title
Surgeon's ergonomy
Description
according to Borg and NASA-TLX scales
Time Frame
every hour during surgery (Borg scale), and at the end of intervention (NASA-TLX scale)
Title
Patient-reported survey of patient health
Description
36-item short form health Survey (SF36) : Scoring is a two-step process. First, numeric values of all items are recoded per the scoring key (for example, values are 0/100, or 0/25/50/75/100 depending the items). All items are scored so that a high score defines a more favorable health state. Each item is scored on a 0 to 100 range so that the lowest and highest possible scores are 0 and 100, respectively. Scores represent the percentage of total possible score achieved. In step 2, items in the same scale are averaged together to create the 8 scale scores: physical functioning, Role functioning/physical, Role functioning/emotional, Energy/fatigue, Emotional well-being, Social functioning, Pain, General health, Health change. Scale scores represent the average for all items in the scale that the respondent answered.
Time Frame
until 2 years after surgery
Title
Description of surgical procedures
Description
operative time (overall intervention, incision or "skin-to-skin", robot).
Time Frame
during surgery
Title
Progression-free survival
Description
delay between the date of randomization and the date of the following event: local relapse, regional relapse, metastasis or death.
Time Frame
until 2 years after surgery
Title
Anatomopathology
Description
rate of exeresis with histologically healthy resection margins (R0), number of lymph nodes removed.
Time Frame
during surgery

10. Eligibility

Sex
Female
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: patient with uterus cancer depending on hysterectomy ± pelvic lymphadenectomy or a restadification patient with cervical cancer depending on enlarged colpo-hysterectomy ± pelvic lymphadenectomy or a surgery after concomitant radiochemotherapy, or lombo aortic lymphadenectomy for a locally advanced cancer, or a restadification patient with cervical cancer depending on a restadification patient aged over 18 years previous antitumor treatment allowed but necessarily disrupted 20 days before inclusion WHO score equal or inferior to 3 cirrhosis-related Child-Pugh score under or equal to A7 are allowed life expectancy equal or superior to 12 weeks patient affiliated to health insurance dated and signed informed consent Exclusion Criteria: metastatic disease pregnant or breastfeeding woman patient unable to proceed follow-up visit, because of geographic, social or mental reasons
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Fabrice NARDUCCI, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Eric LAMBAUDIE, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Institut Paoli-Calmettes
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
CHU Bordeaux, Hôpital Saint-André
City
Bordeaux
ZIP/Postal Code
33300
Country
France
Facility Name
Polyclinique Bordeaux Nord Aquitaine
City
Bordeaux
ZIP/Postal Code
33300
Country
France
Facility Name
Centre Oscar Lambret
City
Lille
ZIP/Postal Code
59000
Country
France
Facility Name
CHRU Lille, Hôpital Jeanne de Flandres
City
Lille
ZIP/Postal Code
59037
Country
France
Facility Name
CHU Limoges
City
Limoges
ZIP/Postal Code
87042
Country
France
Facility Name
Institut Paoli Calmette
City
Marseille
ZIP/Postal Code
13009
Country
France
Facility Name
CHU Nîmes
City
Nimes
ZIP/Postal Code
30029
Country
France
Facility Name
Polyclinique KenVal
City
Nimes
ZIP/Postal Code
30900
Country
France
Facility Name
Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou
City
Paris
ZIP/Postal Code
75015
Country
France
Facility Name
Polyclinique Courlancy
City
Reims
ZIP/Postal Code
51100
Country
France
Facility Name
Centre hospitalier de Roubaix
City
Roubaix
ZIP/Postal Code
59056
Country
France
Facility Name
Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest Site René Gauducheau
City
St HERBLAIN
ZIP/Postal Code
44805
Country
France
Facility Name
Institut Claudius Regaud
City
Toulouse
ZIP/Postal Code
31052
Country
France
Facility Name
CHU Rangueil
City
Toulouse
ZIP/Postal Code
31059
Country
France
Facility Name
CHRU de Tours
City
Tours
ZIP/Postal Code
37044
Country
France
Facility Name
Centre Hospitalier de Valenciennes
City
Valenciennes
ZIP/Postal Code
59322
Country
France
Facility Name
Centre Alexis Vautrin
City
Vandoeuvre-les-Nancy
ZIP/Postal Code
54511
Country
France

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
32467054
Citation
Narducci F, Bogart E, Hebert T, Gauthier T, Collinet P, Classe JM, Lecuru F, Delest A, Motton S, Conri V, Ferrer C, Marchal F, Ferron G, Probst A, Thery J, Le Deley MC, Lefebvre D, Francon D, Leblanc E, Lambaudie E. Severe perioperative morbidity after robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopy in gynecologic oncology: Results of the randomized ROBOGYN-1004 trial. Gynecol Oncol. 2020 Aug;158(2):382-389. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.05.010. Epub 2020 May 25.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Perioperative Morbidity in Gyneco-oncology According to the Procedure : Coelioscopy Versus Robot-assisted Coelioscopy

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs