search
Back to results

Cetuximab Standard or Dose Escalation in First Line Colorectal Cancer (Everest2)

Primary Purpose

Colorectal Cancer

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Dose escalation of cetuximab
Standard first line treatment with cetuximab + Folfiri
Sponsored by
Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Colorectal Cancer focused on measuring colorectal cancer, K-Ras wildtype, first line metastatic, standard cetuximab + FOLFIRI, dose escalation cetuximab

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Written informed consent (+ optional for PK and TR) must be given according to ICH/GCP and national/local regulations.
  2. Patient is at least 18 years of age.
  3. Patient's body weight is ≤ 120 kg.
  4. Histologically proven and measurable (RECIST criteria v.1.1) metastatic adenocarcinoma of the colon or rectum, not in a previously irradiated area.
  5. K-Ras wild type tumour eligible for treatment with cetuximab.
  6. Unresectable metastatic disease.
  7. Life expectancy of at least 12 weeks.
  8. WHO ECOG performance status: 0 or 1.
  9. Effective contraception for both male and female patients if the risk of conception exists.
  10. Adequate organ function.
  11. Adequate bone marrow, hepatic and renal function (assessed within 14 days prior to study entry):

    • Hemoglobin > 10.0 g/dL, absolute neutrophil count > 1.5 x 109/L, platelet count > 100 x 109/L
    • ALAT, ASAT < 2.5 x ULN, up to < 5 x ULN in case of liver metastases
    • Alkaline phosphatase < 2.5 x ULN
    • Total bilirubin < 1.5 x ULN
    • Creatinine clearance > 50 mL/min (calculated according to Cockroft and Gault)

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Prior treatment for metastatic disease (adjuvant therapy with fluoropyrimidines +/-oxaliplatin based regimens allowed if stopped 6 months prior to registration on study).
  2. Prior treatment with EGFR inhibitor or chemotherapy with irinotecan in adjuvant settings.
  3. Surgery (excluding diagnostic biopsy) or irradiation within 4 weeks prior to study entry.
  4. Administration of any investigational drug or agent/procedure, i.e. participation in another trial within 4 weeks before beginning treatment.
  5. Concurrent chronic systemic immune therapy, chemotherapy, radiation therapy or hormone therapy not indicated in the study protocol.
  6. Any active dermatological condition > grade 1.
  7. Brain metastasis (known or suspected).
  8. Significant impairment of intestinal absorption (e.g. chronic diarrhea, inflammatory bowel disease).
  9. Other uncontrolled concomitant illness, including serious uncontrolled intercurrent infection.
  10. Uncontrolled coronary artery disease and/or unstable angina, a history of a myocardial infarction within the last 12 months or heart failure NYHA class III or IV. High risk of uncontrolled arrhythmia.
  11. Known allergy or any other adverse reaction to any of the drugs or to any related compound.
  12. Known dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) deficiency.
  13. Gilbert disease.
  14. Previous (within 5 years) or concurrent malignancies at other sites with the exception of surgically cured or adequately treated carcinoma in-situ of the cervix and basal cell carcinoma of the skin.
  15. Organ allografts requiring immunosuppressive therapy.
  16. Pregnancy (absence confirmed by serum/urine beta human choriongonadotrophin in pre-menopausal women) or breast-feeding.
  17. Medical, social or psychological condition which, in the opinion of the investigator, would not permit the patient to complete the study or sign meaningful informed consent.

Sites / Locations

  • Universitätsklinik für Innere medizin, Klinishe abteilung für hämatologie und Onkologie
  • LKH Leoben, abteilung f. innere Medizin
  • AKH Linz, Innere Medizin 3, Zentrum für Hämatologie und medizinishe Onkologie
  • Landeskrankenhaus Salzburg, Univ. Klinik für innere Medizin III, Universitätsklinikum der PMU
  • Krankenanstalt Rudolfstiftung, 1 medizinishe Abteilung
  • St Vincent Krankenhaus Betriebs GmbH
  • Imelda Ziekenhuis
  • Erasme Hospital
  • Cliniques Universitaires St Luc
  • AZ Middelares Gent
  • UZ Gent
  • Centre Hospitalier de Jolimont-Lobbes, Oncology Médicale
  • AZ Groeninge
  • UZ Gasthuisberg
  • CHC Saint Joseph
  • AZ Sint Maarten Mechelen/Duffel
  • H. Hartziekenhuis
  • AZ Turnhout (Campus St Elisabeth)
  • Hôpital Avicennes
  • Hôpital Saint-André
  • Hopital Européen Georges Pompidou
  • Centre Eugène Marquis
  • CHU Charles Nicolle
  • State Health Center
  • Medical Center of the University of Pecs , National Institute Oncology
  • Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron
  • Institut Català d'Oncologia
  • Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla
  • Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío
  • Hospital Clinico Universitario De Valencia

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Other

Experimental

Arm Label

Arm B - standard dose of cetuximab

Arm A - dose escalation of cetuximab

Arm Description

Patients with skin toxicity grade 1-4 or other significant toxicity who are not eligible for dose escalation will continue on the standard dose of cetuximab 250 mg/m2 weekly. No comparison between arms was planned.

Patients with skin toxicity grade 0 will follow an increasing dose schedule: on days 22 and 29 they will receive 350 mg/m2 and from day 36 onwards, 500 mg/m2 weekly.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

PFS Probability Rate at 9 Months in the Dose Escalation Arm
A precise estimate (+/- 10%) of the probability of not having progression at 9 months. This measure is an estimation derived from the Kaplan-Meier algorithm and does not represent a dimple percentage of participants.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Progression Free Survival (PFS) Median Time
Progression free survival time was considered from start of treatment until the first observation of disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. All patients (ITT).
Progression Free Survival (PFS) Median Time for Resected Patients
Progression free survival time was considered from start of treatment until the first observation of disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. This is the subset of resected patients (resection of secondary lesions with curative intent was performed). Patients resected after they started subsequent anti-cancer treatment or after progression on treatment were not considered as 'resected for metastatic lesions on study'. Patients were not censored at time of surgery.
Progression Free Survival (PFS) Time for Resected Versus Non-resected Patients (Hazard Ratio)
Progression free survival time was considered from start of treatment until the first observation of disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. This is the subset of resected patients (resection of secondary lesions with curative intent was performed). Patients resected after they started subsequent anti-cancer treatment or after progression on treatment were not considered as 'resected for metastatic lesions on study'. Patients were not censored at time of surgery.
Death Rates by 3 Years Follow-up
Deaths by 3 years follow-up after last cetuximab administration + 30 days. All patients (ITT).
Overall Survival (OS) Median Time
Overall survival was considered from start of treatment to death. All patients (ITT).
Overall Survival (OS) Median Time for Resected Patients
Overall survival was considered from start of treatment to death. Subset of resected patients (resection of secondary lesions with curative intent was performed). Patients resected after they started subsequent anti-cancer treatment (600-01-006 and 600-04-006) or after progression (100-02-002, End point description: Clinical trial results 2009-009992-36 version 1 EU-CTR publication date: Page 15 of 38 200-03-001, and 600-01-038) were not considered as 'resected for metastatic lesions on study.
Overall Response
Overall response is defined as the best tumor response on treatment of either complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) (CR + PR). Tumor response is based on the CT/MRI assessments of target and non-target lesions as well as considering the occurrence of new lesions as per RECIST criteria. All patients (ITT).
Overall Response in Patients With Liver-limited Disease
Overall response is defined as the best tumor response on treatment of either complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) (CR + PR). Tumor response is based on the imaging (CT/MRI) assessments of target and non-target lesions as well as considering the occurrence of new lesions as per RECIST criteria. Subset of patients with liver-limited disease.
Disease Control
Disease control is defined as a best response on treatment (e.g. till end of treatment evaluation) of either complete response (CR), partial response (PR), or stable disease (SD) (CR + PR + SD). RECIST criteria (CT/MRI). All patients (ITT).
Disease Control in Patients With Liver-limited Disease
Disease control is defined as a best response on treatment (e.g. till end of treatment evaluation) of either complete response (CR), partial response (PR), or stable disease (SD) (CR + PR + SD). RECIST criteria (CT/MRI). Subset of patients with liver-limited disease.
Duration of Response
The duration of response in responding patients is defined as the time interval from the time measurement criteria are first met for CR/PR during treatment to either the first time disease progression is documented or death. Subset of responders.
Duration of Response in Liver-limited Disease Patients
The duration of response in responding patients is defined as the time interval from the time measurement criteria are first met for CR/PR during treatment to either the first time disease progression is documented or death. Subset of responders among patients with liver-limited disease.
Resections for Metastatic Lesions
All patients were deemed non-resectable at baseline but some became resectable during or posttreatment. All patients (ITT). Only those patients in whom resection of secondary lesions with curative intent was performed were considered as 'resected'. Patients resected after they started subsequent anti-cancer treatment (600-01-006 and 600-04-006) or after progression (100-02-002, 200-03-001, and 600-01-038) were not considered as 'resected for metastatic lesions on study'.
R0 Rate (Free of Tumor After Resection for Metastatic Lesions)
Rate of patients free of tumor after surgery. Subset of resected patients (resection of secondary lesions with curative intent was performed). Patients resected after they started subsequent anti-cancer treatment (600-01-006 and 600-04-006) or after progression (100-02-002, 200-03-001, and 600-01- 038) were not considered as 'resected for metastatic lesions on study'.
Skin Toxicity (Safety)
Treatment-emergent adverse events identified by the investigator as skin reaction or events with description skin infection or nail infection. Grading of severity was per NCI CTCAE version 4.0. All events are summarized based on the timing of occurrence per Arm in the first two rows, and worst grade per patient events are presented (following 3 rows). Grade 0 is the absence of any skin reaction and grade 3 is worst severity. All patients treated (Safety set). Note: There were 3 deviations from arm allocation rules based on the occurrence of skin toxicity. Detailed data is available upon request.
Laboratory Safety Assessments
Severe laboratory abnormalities (hematology and biochemistry grade 3 and higher). Worst grade per patient. All patients treated (Safety set).
Deaths Till 30 Days From Last Cetuximab Administration
Deaths of all causes occuring between the signature of consent and the date of last cetuximab administration + 30 days are listed per arm. None of these fatalities were deemed related to the investigational drug.

Full Information

First Posted
December 1, 2010
Last Updated
October 10, 2019
Sponsor
Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven
Collaborators
Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01251536
Brief Title
Cetuximab Standard or Dose Escalation in First Line Colorectal Cancer
Acronym
Everest2
Official Title
A Two Arm Phase II Study of FOLFIRI in Combination With Standard or Escalating Dose of Cetuximab as First Line Treatment of K-Ras Wild Type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Everest 2
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
October 2019
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
December 2010 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
June 2016 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
July 2019 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven
Collaborators
Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The purposes of this study are to determine whether administering escalating doses of cetuximab in patients with no early skin toxicity could delay the progression of disease in a significant proportion of patients and to study the molecular signatures of response.
Detailed Description
Colorectal carcinoma (CRC) is the third most common form of cancer worldwide and remains a leading malignancy both in incidence and mortality. In the light of existing knowledge, the investigators propose a phase II open label, two arm study in patients presenting with K-Ras wild-type metastatic colorectal tumours in the first line setting. The standard combination of irinotecan plus infusional 5-FU/LV (FOLFIRI) and cetuximab will be given to all patients entering the study. As the investigators hypothesize that increasing the dose of cetuximab might increase the intensity of skin reactions that directly correlates with outcome, in patients experiencing no skin toxicity, the dose of cetuximab will be escalated from 250 mg/m2 to 350 mg/m2 and then up to 500 mg/m2, in order to better define the effect of dose escalation in the first-line setting in a K-Ras wild type tumour population and in an attempt to increase efficacy. Pharmacokinetic studies will be performed to document PK parameters of cetuximab in patients from both arms in selected centers. Translational research studies are planned for all patients. Some more in depth molecular testing will be performed in a subset of patients from whom three serial tissue samples from accessible metastases by biopsy are available.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Colorectal Cancer
Keywords
colorectal cancer, K-Ras wildtype, first line metastatic, standard cetuximab + FOLFIRI, dose escalation cetuximab

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Non-Randomized
Enrollment
108 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Arm B - standard dose of cetuximab
Arm Type
Other
Arm Description
Patients with skin toxicity grade 1-4 or other significant toxicity who are not eligible for dose escalation will continue on the standard dose of cetuximab 250 mg/m2 weekly. No comparison between arms was planned.
Arm Title
Arm A - dose escalation of cetuximab
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Patients with skin toxicity grade 0 will follow an increasing dose schedule: on days 22 and 29 they will receive 350 mg/m2 and from day 36 onwards, 500 mg/m2 weekly.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Dose escalation of cetuximab
Other Intervention Name(s)
Erbitux
Intervention Description
Dose, frequency & treatment mode: 400 mg/m2 (loading at day 1) followed by 250 mg/m2 weekly (at day 8 and 15) Arm allocation at day 22: Patients with skin toxicity grade 0 will follow an increasing dose schedule: on days 22 and 29 they will receive 350 mg/m2 and from day 36 onwards, 500 mg/m2 weekly
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Standard first line treatment with cetuximab + Folfiri
Other Intervention Name(s)
Erbitux
Intervention Description
Dose, frequency & treatment mode: 400 mg/m2 (loading at day 1) followed by 250 mg/m2 weekly (at day 8 and 15) Arm allocation at day 22: Patients with skin toxicity grade 1-4 or other significant toxicity who are not eligible for dose escalation will continue on the standard dose of cetuximab: 250 mg/m2 weekly.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
PFS Probability Rate at 9 Months in the Dose Escalation Arm
Description
A precise estimate (+/- 10%) of the probability of not having progression at 9 months. This measure is an estimation derived from the Kaplan-Meier algorithm and does not represent a dimple percentage of participants.
Time Frame
9 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Progression Free Survival (PFS) Median Time
Description
Progression free survival time was considered from start of treatment until the first observation of disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. All patients (ITT).
Time Frame
Treatment + follow-up (3 years from database lock)
Title
Progression Free Survival (PFS) Median Time for Resected Patients
Description
Progression free survival time was considered from start of treatment until the first observation of disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. This is the subset of resected patients (resection of secondary lesions with curative intent was performed). Patients resected after they started subsequent anti-cancer treatment or after progression on treatment were not considered as 'resected for metastatic lesions on study'. Patients were not censored at time of surgery.
Time Frame
Treatment + follow-up (3 years from database lock)
Title
Progression Free Survival (PFS) Time for Resected Versus Non-resected Patients (Hazard Ratio)
Description
Progression free survival time was considered from start of treatment until the first observation of disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. This is the subset of resected patients (resection of secondary lesions with curative intent was performed). Patients resected after they started subsequent anti-cancer treatment or after progression on treatment were not considered as 'resected for metastatic lesions on study'. Patients were not censored at time of surgery.
Time Frame
Treatment + follow-up (3 years from database lock)
Title
Death Rates by 3 Years Follow-up
Description
Deaths by 3 years follow-up after last cetuximab administration + 30 days. All patients (ITT).
Time Frame
Treatment + follow-up (3 years from database lock)
Title
Overall Survival (OS) Median Time
Description
Overall survival was considered from start of treatment to death. All patients (ITT).
Time Frame
Treatment + follow-up (3 years from database lock)
Title
Overall Survival (OS) Median Time for Resected Patients
Description
Overall survival was considered from start of treatment to death. Subset of resected patients (resection of secondary lesions with curative intent was performed). Patients resected after they started subsequent anti-cancer treatment (600-01-006 and 600-04-006) or after progression (100-02-002, End point description: Clinical trial results 2009-009992-36 version 1 EU-CTR publication date: Page 15 of 38 200-03-001, and 600-01-038) were not considered as 'resected for metastatic lesions on study.
Time Frame
Treatment + follow-up (3 years from database lock)
Title
Overall Response
Description
Overall response is defined as the best tumor response on treatment of either complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) (CR + PR). Tumor response is based on the CT/MRI assessments of target and non-target lesions as well as considering the occurrence of new lesions as per RECIST criteria. All patients (ITT).
Time Frame
Treatment duration (interval from first infusion to last infusion on study for each patient), an average of 8.5 months.
Title
Overall Response in Patients With Liver-limited Disease
Description
Overall response is defined as the best tumor response on treatment of either complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) (CR + PR). Tumor response is based on the imaging (CT/MRI) assessments of target and non-target lesions as well as considering the occurrence of new lesions as per RECIST criteria. Subset of patients with liver-limited disease.
Time Frame
Treatment duration (interval from first infusion to last infusion on study for each patient), an average of 8.5 months.
Title
Disease Control
Description
Disease control is defined as a best response on treatment (e.g. till end of treatment evaluation) of either complete response (CR), partial response (PR), or stable disease (SD) (CR + PR + SD). RECIST criteria (CT/MRI). All patients (ITT).
Time Frame
Treatment duration (interval from first infusion to last infusion on study for each patient), an average of 8.5 months.
Title
Disease Control in Patients With Liver-limited Disease
Description
Disease control is defined as a best response on treatment (e.g. till end of treatment evaluation) of either complete response (CR), partial response (PR), or stable disease (SD) (CR + PR + SD). RECIST criteria (CT/MRI). Subset of patients with liver-limited disease.
Time Frame
Treatment duration (interval from first infusion to last infusion on study for each patient), an average of 8.5 months.
Title
Duration of Response
Description
The duration of response in responding patients is defined as the time interval from the time measurement criteria are first met for CR/PR during treatment to either the first time disease progression is documented or death. Subset of responders.
Time Frame
Treatment + follow-up (3 years from database lock)
Title
Duration of Response in Liver-limited Disease Patients
Description
The duration of response in responding patients is defined as the time interval from the time measurement criteria are first met for CR/PR during treatment to either the first time disease progression is documented or death. Subset of responders among patients with liver-limited disease.
Time Frame
Treatment + follow-up (3 years from database lock)
Title
Resections for Metastatic Lesions
Description
All patients were deemed non-resectable at baseline but some became resectable during or posttreatment. All patients (ITT). Only those patients in whom resection of secondary lesions with curative intent was performed were considered as 'resected'. Patients resected after they started subsequent anti-cancer treatment (600-01-006 and 600-04-006) or after progression (100-02-002, 200-03-001, and 600-01-038) were not considered as 'resected for metastatic lesions on study'.
Time Frame
Treatment + follow-up (3 years from database lock)
Title
R0 Rate (Free of Tumor After Resection for Metastatic Lesions)
Description
Rate of patients free of tumor after surgery. Subset of resected patients (resection of secondary lesions with curative intent was performed). Patients resected after they started subsequent anti-cancer treatment (600-01-006 and 600-04-006) or after progression (100-02-002, 200-03-001, and 600-01- 038) were not considered as 'resected for metastatic lesions on study'.
Time Frame
Treatment + follow-up (3 years from database lock)
Title
Skin Toxicity (Safety)
Description
Treatment-emergent adverse events identified by the investigator as skin reaction or events with description skin infection or nail infection. Grading of severity was per NCI CTCAE version 4.0. All events are summarized based on the timing of occurrence per Arm in the first two rows, and worst grade per patient events are presented (following 3 rows). Grade 0 is the absence of any skin reaction and grade 3 is worst severity. All patients treated (Safety set). Note: There were 3 deviations from arm allocation rules based on the occurrence of skin toxicity. Detailed data is available upon request.
Time Frame
From signature of informed consent to last cetuximab administration on study plus 30 days for each patient, an average of 9.5 months.
Title
Laboratory Safety Assessments
Description
Severe laboratory abnormalities (hematology and biochemistry grade 3 and higher). Worst grade per patient. All patients treated (Safety set).
Time Frame
From signature of informed consent to last cetuximab administration on study plus 30 days for each patient, an average of 9.5 months.
Title
Deaths Till 30 Days From Last Cetuximab Administration
Description
Deaths of all causes occuring between the signature of consent and the date of last cetuximab administration + 30 days are listed per arm. None of these fatalities were deemed related to the investigational drug.
Time Frame
From signature of informed consent to last cetuximab administration on study plus 30 days for each patient, an average of 9.5 months.

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Written informed consent (+ optional for PK and TR) must be given according to ICH/GCP and national/local regulations. Patient is at least 18 years of age. Patient's body weight is ≤ 120 kg. Histologically proven and measurable (RECIST criteria v.1.1) metastatic adenocarcinoma of the colon or rectum, not in a previously irradiated area. K-Ras wild type tumour eligible for treatment with cetuximab. Unresectable metastatic disease. Life expectancy of at least 12 weeks. WHO ECOG performance status: 0 or 1. Effective contraception for both male and female patients if the risk of conception exists. Adequate organ function. Adequate bone marrow, hepatic and renal function (assessed within 14 days prior to study entry): Hemoglobin > 10.0 g/dL, absolute neutrophil count > 1.5 x 109/L, platelet count > 100 x 109/L ALAT, ASAT < 2.5 x ULN, up to < 5 x ULN in case of liver metastases Alkaline phosphatase < 2.5 x ULN Total bilirubin < 1.5 x ULN Creatinine clearance > 50 mL/min (calculated according to Cockroft and Gault) Exclusion Criteria: Prior treatment for metastatic disease (adjuvant therapy with fluoropyrimidines +/-oxaliplatin based regimens allowed if stopped 6 months prior to registration on study). Prior treatment with EGFR inhibitor or chemotherapy with irinotecan in adjuvant settings. Surgery (excluding diagnostic biopsy) or irradiation within 4 weeks prior to study entry. Administration of any investigational drug or agent/procedure, i.e. participation in another trial within 4 weeks before beginning treatment. Concurrent chronic systemic immune therapy, chemotherapy, radiation therapy or hormone therapy not indicated in the study protocol. Any active dermatological condition > grade 1. Brain metastasis (known or suspected). Significant impairment of intestinal absorption (e.g. chronic diarrhea, inflammatory bowel disease). Other uncontrolled concomitant illness, including serious uncontrolled intercurrent infection. Uncontrolled coronary artery disease and/or unstable angina, a history of a myocardial infarction within the last 12 months or heart failure NYHA class III or IV. High risk of uncontrolled arrhythmia. Known allergy or any other adverse reaction to any of the drugs or to any related compound. Known dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) deficiency. Gilbert disease. Previous (within 5 years) or concurrent malignancies at other sites with the exception of surgically cured or adequately treated carcinoma in-situ of the cervix and basal cell carcinoma of the skin. Organ allografts requiring immunosuppressive therapy. Pregnancy (absence confirmed by serum/urine beta human choriongonadotrophin in pre-menopausal women) or breast-feeding. Medical, social or psychological condition which, in the opinion of the investigator, would not permit the patient to complete the study or sign meaningful informed consent.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Eric Van Cutsem, MD
Organizational Affiliation
UZ Leuven
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Universitätsklinik für Innere medizin, Klinishe abteilung für hämatologie und Onkologie
City
Innsbruck
Country
Austria
Facility Name
LKH Leoben, abteilung f. innere Medizin
City
Leoben
Country
Austria
Facility Name
AKH Linz, Innere Medizin 3, Zentrum für Hämatologie und medizinishe Onkologie
City
Linz
Country
Austria
Facility Name
Landeskrankenhaus Salzburg, Univ. Klinik für innere Medizin III, Universitätsklinikum der PMU
City
Salzburg
Country
Austria
Facility Name
Krankenanstalt Rudolfstiftung, 1 medizinishe Abteilung
City
Wien
Country
Austria
Facility Name
St Vincent Krankenhaus Betriebs GmbH
City
Zams
Country
Austria
Facility Name
Imelda Ziekenhuis
City
Bonheiden
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
Erasme Hospital
City
Brussels
ZIP/Postal Code
1070
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
Cliniques Universitaires St Luc
City
Brussels
ZIP/Postal Code
1200
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
AZ Middelares Gent
City
Gent
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
UZ Gent
City
Gent
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
Centre Hospitalier de Jolimont-Lobbes, Oncology Médicale
City
Haine Saint Paul
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
AZ Groeninge
City
Kortrijk
ZIP/Postal Code
8500
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
UZ Gasthuisberg
City
Leuven
ZIP/Postal Code
3000
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
CHC Saint Joseph
City
Liege
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
AZ Sint Maarten Mechelen/Duffel
City
Mechelen
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
H. Hartziekenhuis
City
Roeselare
ZIP/Postal Code
8800
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
AZ Turnhout (Campus St Elisabeth)
City
Turnhout
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
Hôpital Avicennes
City
Bobigny
Country
France
Facility Name
Hôpital Saint-André
City
Bordeaux
ZIP/Postal Code
33000
Country
France
Facility Name
Hopital Européen Georges Pompidou
City
Paris
ZIP/Postal Code
75015
Country
France
Facility Name
Centre Eugène Marquis
City
Rennes Cedex
ZIP/Postal Code
35042
Country
France
Facility Name
CHU Charles Nicolle
City
Rouen
ZIP/Postal Code
76031
Country
France
Facility Name
State Health Center
City
Budapest
ZIP/Postal Code
1062
Country
Hungary
Facility Name
Medical Center of the University of Pecs , National Institute Oncology
City
Budapest
ZIP/Postal Code
1122
Country
Hungary
Facility Name
Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron
City
Barcelona
ZIP/Postal Code
8035
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Institut Català d'Oncologia
City
Barcelona
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla
City
Santander
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío
City
Sevilla
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Hospital Clinico Universitario De Valencia
City
Valencia
Country
Spain

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No

Learn more about this trial

Cetuximab Standard or Dose Escalation in First Line Colorectal Cancer

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs