search
Back to results

Cognitive Training for Nicotine Dependence

Primary Purpose

Tobacco Use Disorder, Nicotine Addiction

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Cognitive Training
Control training
Sponsored by
University of Pennsylvania
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Tobacco Use Disorder focused on measuring Tobacco, Smoking, Cognition, Behavioral Training, Relapse

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 65 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion:

  1. Healthy male and female treatment-seeking smokers who are between 18 and 65 years of age and self-report smoking at least 5 cigarettes (menthol and/or non-menthol) per day for at least the last 6 months
  2. Plan to live in the area for at least the next 8 months
  3. Capable of giving written informed consent, which includes compliance with the requirements and restrictions listed in the combined consent and HIPAA form
  4. Able to communicate fluently in English (speaking, writing, and reading)
  5. Have uninterrupted access to a home computer with sound capabilities, keyboard, mouse, and active Internet connection
  6. Provide a Carbon Monoxide (CO) breath test reading greater than or equal to 8 parts per million (ppm) at Intake Visit

Sites / Locations

  • Center for Interdiscplinary Research on Nicotine Addiction, University of Pennsylvania

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Placebo Comparator

Arm Label

Cognitive Training

Control Training

Arm Description

Participants in this arm received computerized cognitive training in addition to nicotine patch and smoking cessation counseling.

Participants in this arm received computerized control training in addition to nicotine patch and smoking cessation counseling

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Point-prevalence Abstinence at End of Treatment
Daily smoking, from the Target Quit Date to End of Treatment (EOT), was assessed by a validated timeline follow-back measure. Based on guidelines for smoking cessation trials, the primary outcome was 7-day point prevalence abstinence at EOT, and abstinence was defined as no self-reported smoking (even a puff) for at least 7 days, with in-person verification by carbon monoxide breath levels (CO <8ppm). Following standard convention, participants who withdrew or were lost to follow-up were considered smokers.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Point-prevalence Abstinence at 6-month Follow-up
Daily smoking from the Target Quit Date to 6 month follow-up was assessed by a validated timeline follow-back measure. Based on guidelines for smoking cessation trials, the secondary outcome was 7-day point prevalence abstinence at the 6 month follow-up, and abstinence was defined as no self-reported smoking (even a puff) for at least 7 days, with in-person verification by carbon monoxide breath levels (CO <8ppm). Following standard convention, participants who withdrew or were lost to follow-up were considered smokers.
Cognitive Performance (Working Memory)
Change in performance on the Digit Span Forward task (working memory) between Baseline and End of Treatment (Week 12). In this task, participants are presented with a series of digits on the computer screen at one second intervals. Participants are then required to enter the digits in order. The number of digits in each series ranges from 3 to 7, and the maximum recall span is the length of the largest series entered correctly. The outcome measure is the change score (calculated by subtracting the Baseline score from the end of treatment score). Change scores can range from -4 to 4. Negative numbers indicate worse performance at EOT; positive numbers indicate better performance at EOT; and 0 indicates no change.
Cognitive Performance (Response Inhibition)
Change in performance on the Go/No-Go Task (response inhibition) between Baseline and End of Treatment (Week 12). In this task, participants are presented with a series of stimuli (the word "PRESS" in either green or red). Participants are instructed to respond by pressing the spacebar when the stimulus is green, and to withhold a response when the stimulus is red. The outcome is the change in number of commission errors (failure to withhold a response to a red stimulus) from EOT minus baseline. The potential range for the change score is -42 to 42. Negative numbers indicate a decrease in the number of commission errors (improved performance) from baseline to EOT; positive numbers indicate an increase in commission errors (worse performance); 0 indicates no change.
Cognitive Performance (Attention)
Change in performance on the Continuous Performance Task (attention) between Baseline and End of Treatment (Week 12). In this task, participants are presented with a series of letters at 2.5s intervals and are instructed to respond by pressing the space bar if the same letter appears twice in a row. The outcome is the change in the number of commission errors (the number of times the participant responded to a non-target at EOT minus baseline). There are a total of 125 trials, with 20 target trials (response required) and 85 non-target trials (no response required); therefore the possible range for the change score is -85 to 85. Negative numbers indicate a decrease in commission errors (better performance at EOT compared to baseline); positive numbers indicate an increase in commission errors (worse performance at EOT compared to baseline); and 0 indicates no change.

Full Information

First Posted
December 1, 2010
Last Updated
January 12, 2017
Sponsor
University of Pennsylvania
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01252966
Brief Title
Cognitive Training for Nicotine Dependence
Official Title
Cognitive Training for Nicotine Dependence
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
January 2017
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
March 2011 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
September 2015 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
September 2015 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
University of Pennsylvania

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This randomized clinical trial tested the effects of a computerized (web-based) cognitive training intervention on smoking cessation. All participants received 8 weeks of standard nicotine patch therapy, smoking cessation counseling, and were randomized to 1 of 2 different training programs: cognitive training vs. control training.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Tobacco Use Disorder, Nicotine Addiction
Keywords
Tobacco, Smoking, Cognition, Behavioral Training, Relapse

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Participant
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
213 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Cognitive Training
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participants in this arm received computerized cognitive training in addition to nicotine patch and smoking cessation counseling.
Arm Title
Control Training
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
Participants in this arm received computerized control training in addition to nicotine patch and smoking cessation counseling
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Cognitive Training
Intervention Description
The computerized cognitive training intervention is a 12-week standardized course of internet-based computerized cognitive exercises designed to enhance executive cognitive function.
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Control training
Intervention Description
The computerized control training intervention is a 12-week standardized course of internet-based deep breathing exercises which does not contain the cognitive exercises designed to enhance executive cognitive function.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Point-prevalence Abstinence at End of Treatment
Description
Daily smoking, from the Target Quit Date to End of Treatment (EOT), was assessed by a validated timeline follow-back measure. Based on guidelines for smoking cessation trials, the primary outcome was 7-day point prevalence abstinence at EOT, and abstinence was defined as no self-reported smoking (even a puff) for at least 7 days, with in-person verification by carbon monoxide breath levels (CO <8ppm). Following standard convention, participants who withdrew or were lost to follow-up were considered smokers.
Time Frame
End of treatment (Week 12)
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Point-prevalence Abstinence at 6-month Follow-up
Description
Daily smoking from the Target Quit Date to 6 month follow-up was assessed by a validated timeline follow-back measure. Based on guidelines for smoking cessation trials, the secondary outcome was 7-day point prevalence abstinence at the 6 month follow-up, and abstinence was defined as no self-reported smoking (even a puff) for at least 7 days, with in-person verification by carbon monoxide breath levels (CO <8ppm). Following standard convention, participants who withdrew or were lost to follow-up were considered smokers.
Time Frame
6 month follow-up
Title
Cognitive Performance (Working Memory)
Description
Change in performance on the Digit Span Forward task (working memory) between Baseline and End of Treatment (Week 12). In this task, participants are presented with a series of digits on the computer screen at one second intervals. Participants are then required to enter the digits in order. The number of digits in each series ranges from 3 to 7, and the maximum recall span is the length of the largest series entered correctly. The outcome measure is the change score (calculated by subtracting the Baseline score from the end of treatment score). Change scores can range from -4 to 4. Negative numbers indicate worse performance at EOT; positive numbers indicate better performance at EOT; and 0 indicates no change.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 12 (EOT)
Title
Cognitive Performance (Response Inhibition)
Description
Change in performance on the Go/No-Go Task (response inhibition) between Baseline and End of Treatment (Week 12). In this task, participants are presented with a series of stimuli (the word "PRESS" in either green or red). Participants are instructed to respond by pressing the spacebar when the stimulus is green, and to withhold a response when the stimulus is red. The outcome is the change in number of commission errors (failure to withhold a response to a red stimulus) from EOT minus baseline. The potential range for the change score is -42 to 42. Negative numbers indicate a decrease in the number of commission errors (improved performance) from baseline to EOT; positive numbers indicate an increase in commission errors (worse performance); 0 indicates no change.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 12 (EOT)
Title
Cognitive Performance (Attention)
Description
Change in performance on the Continuous Performance Task (attention) between Baseline and End of Treatment (Week 12). In this task, participants are presented with a series of letters at 2.5s intervals and are instructed to respond by pressing the space bar if the same letter appears twice in a row. The outcome is the change in the number of commission errors (the number of times the participant responded to a non-target at EOT minus baseline). There are a total of 125 trials, with 20 target trials (response required) and 85 non-target trials (no response required); therefore the possible range for the change score is -85 to 85. Negative numbers indicate a decrease in commission errors (better performance at EOT compared to baseline); positive numbers indicate an increase in commission errors (worse performance at EOT compared to baseline); and 0 indicates no change.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 12 (EOT)

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
65 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion: Healthy male and female treatment-seeking smokers who are between 18 and 65 years of age and self-report smoking at least 5 cigarettes (menthol and/or non-menthol) per day for at least the last 6 months Plan to live in the area for at least the next 8 months Capable of giving written informed consent, which includes compliance with the requirements and restrictions listed in the combined consent and HIPAA form Able to communicate fluently in English (speaking, writing, and reading) Have uninterrupted access to a home computer with sound capabilities, keyboard, mouse, and active Internet connection Provide a Carbon Monoxide (CO) breath test reading greater than or equal to 8 parts per million (ppm) at Intake Visit
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Caryn Lerman, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
University of Pennsylvania
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Center for Interdiscplinary Research on Nicotine Addiction, University of Pennsylvania
City
Philadelphia
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
19104
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
28694338
Citation
Kable JW, Caulfield MK, Falcone M, McConnell M, Bernardo L, Parthasarathi T, Cooper N, Ashare R, Audrain-McGovern J, Hornik R, Diefenbach P, Lee FJ, Lerman C. No Effect of Commercial Cognitive Training on Brain Activity, Choice Behavior, or Cognitive Performance. J Neurosci. 2017 Aug 2;37(31):7390-7402. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2832-16.2017. Epub 2017 Jul 10.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Cognitive Training for Nicotine Dependence

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs