search
Back to results

Effect of Minimising Ultrasound Power to 1% During Cataract Surgery on Corneal Endothelium. (OCTOPUS)

Primary Purpose

Cataract

Status
Unknown status
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
India
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
one percent ultrasound power in CMICS
40 percent ultrasound power in CMICS
Sponsored by
Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Hospital
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Cataract focused on measuring cataract,, phacoemulsification,, one percent ultrasound, endothelial cell density

Eligibility Criteria

40 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients of >40yrs will be included in the study.
  2. Grade 0.1-6.0 (LOCS III grading) of senile cataract.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with pre-operative endothelial cell density count less than 1500cells/mm2.
  2. All eye pathologies that can compromise the visual recovery.
  3. Eyes with any kind of corneal dystrophy or corneal scars preventing visualisation of cataract for reliable grading.
  4. Raised intraocular pressure (> 21 mmHg).
  5. Previous intraocular surgery.

Sites / Locations

  • Dr. R.M.L.Hospital,Recruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

one percent ultrasound

40 percent ultrasound

Arm Description

Co-axial MICS shall be performed in cases allocated to this arm .The ultrasound power shall be kept at one percent during the surgery.A note of effective phacotime,volume of fluid aspirated and any intraoperative complications shall be made.

Co-axial MICS shall be performed in cases allocated to this arm .The ultrasound power shall be kept at 40 percent during the surgery.A note of effective phacotime,volume of fluid aspirated and any intraoperative complications shall be made.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

change in endothelial cell count from baseline over time
Noncontact specular microscope (EM - 3000; TOMEY: VERSION 2A/OJ) will be used to calculate the endothelial cell density, coefficient of variation of cell size, percentage of hexagonal cells and corneal thickness before surgery and 1day, 1 week, 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months visits after surgery. 3 endothelial cell photographs will be taken at each visit and the mean cell count of three photographs will be calculated. Counts will be performed by an observer blinded to which procedure the patient had undergone. Endothelial cell loss will be calculated as a percentage of pre operative cell density

Secondary Outcome Measures

change in Intraocular pressure from baseline
Intraocular pressure will be measured using applanation tonometer.
visual acuity
snellens visual acuity will be converted to Logmar scale and recorded with and without spectacle correction
posterior capsular rupture
any incidence of posterior capsular rupture during surgery would be noted

Full Information

First Posted
December 6, 2010
Last Updated
December 14, 2010
Sponsor
Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Hospital
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01259349
Brief Title
Effect of Minimising Ultrasound Power to 1% During Cataract Surgery on Corneal Endothelium.
Acronym
OCTOPUS
Official Title
Standard Coaxial Microincision Cataract Surgery Versus Coaxial Microincision Cataract Surgery Using 1% Ultrasound in Immature Senile Cataract :a Corneal Endothelium Study
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
November 2010
Overall Recruitment Status
Unknown status
Study Start Date
November 2010 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
April 2011 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
April 2012 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Name of the Sponsor
Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Hospital

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Coaxial microincision cataract surgery using 1% ultrasound is not inferior to standard coaxial microincision cataract surgery in patients of grade 0.1-6.0 immature senile cataract in terms of corneal endothelial safety.
Detailed Description
Corneal endothelial damage and posterior capsular rupture are two most undesirable complications of cataract surgery, infact significant loss of endothelium can lead to corneal decompensation and loss of corneal clarity. However, some degree of endothelial cell loss is inevitable after any cataract surgery. A loss of 3.2%-23.2% has been shown in various studies since 1967. It is well known that during cataract surgery many different factors can generate endothelial damages, these include the impact of the nuclear fragments, the turbulence generated in anterior chamber and the volume of liquid. It is also related to the amount of ultrasonic energy used and the subsequent temperature rise, the contact with surgical instruments and the IOL during implantation. It also depends on the release of free radicals the length and features of incision,the surgical technique used . The risk of endothelial cell density loss is further enhanced when surgeons have to deal with high density cataract, shallow anterior chamber and old age. Since the time Kelman introduced his technique of phacoemulsification, there has been constant and conscious effort on the part of phaco surgeons to reduce their phaco time by bringing some alteration or innovation in their personal technique or introducing new technologies for the procedure of phacoemulsification. Development of Laser emulsifier, SONAAR machines, introduction of cold phaco with modulations of ultrasound in the form of pulse, micropulse and bursts were achievements towards attaining this end and goal. Coaxial microphacoemulsification is the standard phacoemulsification technique being practised globally for cataract extraction and on many occasions we intentionally do not use the phaco power either at all or fully as per the pre set limit. In fact the use of efficient fluidic controls and a chopper minimizes the use of phaco energy. If we could assess a zero/minimal ultrasound technique in a scientific setting we might achieve the desired goal without resorting to major modifications of instrumentation and machine. Coaxial MICS fully utilizes the advantages of small incision and provides the most comfortable platform for the surgeons using conventional phacoemulsification. We imagined that most ideal setting would be introducing zero phaco power in the anterior chamber for emulsifying the nucleus as has been done already in case of Aqualase using warm fluid based system and Howard Fines new technique of mechanically emulsifying the lens with rotators(under investigation). For that we undertook a pilot study in 10 patients and performed coaxial microincision phacoemulsification, introducing the ultrasound power in incremental fashion during the surgery in each of the 10 patients till we could achieve the adequate aspiration of fluid and fragments . At zero power the phacotip and tubing experienced repeated blockages with associated prolongation of surgical time,thus increment to one percent was made during the same sitting. To our surprise, the very first step of introducing 1% ultrasound power made all the difference.No further increments were required as all techniques of nuclear management and lens aspiration were conveniently possible at this setting. The procedure of aspiration of fragments was smooth and continuous, it also caused a reduction in the surgical time in comparison to zero power phaco.The cases revealed less corneal endothelial trauma in comparison to conventional phacoemulsification using higher power settings. The most surprising observation was that we could dissemble the nucleus with any known technique of nucleus fragmentation(stop and chop, divide and conquer, phaco-chop) in almost all grades of cataracts .Possibly that high vaccum 300-350 is responsible for this nuclear fragmentation and not only the cavitational effects of ultrasound power. Keeping all the other parameters uniform we wish to design an RCT to study the effect of eliminating phaco power. With this in view,this study compares the endothelial status in addition to various complications and visual outcome following standard coaxial microincision cataract surgery and coaxial microincision cataract surgery using 1% ultrasound.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Cataract
Keywords
cataract,, phacoemulsification,, one percent ultrasound, endothelial cell density

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
72 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
one percent ultrasound
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Co-axial MICS shall be performed in cases allocated to this arm .The ultrasound power shall be kept at one percent during the surgery.A note of effective phacotime,volume of fluid aspirated and any intraoperative complications shall be made.
Arm Title
40 percent ultrasound
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Co-axial MICS shall be performed in cases allocated to this arm .The ultrasound power shall be kept at 40 percent during the surgery.A note of effective phacotime,volume of fluid aspirated and any intraoperative complications shall be made.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
one percent ultrasound power in CMICS
Other Intervention Name(s)
OCTOPUS
Intervention Description
Co-axial MICS shall be performed in cases allocated to this arm .The ultrasound power shall be kept at one percent during the surgery.A note of effective phacotime,volume of fluid aspirated and any intraoperative complications shall be made.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
40 percent ultrasound power in CMICS
Other Intervention Name(s)
standard CMICS
Intervention Description
Co-axial MICS shall be performed in cases allocated to this arm .The ultrasound power shall be kept at 40 percent during the surgery.A note of effective phacotime,volume of fluid aspirated and any intraoperative complications shall be made.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
change in endothelial cell count from baseline over time
Description
Noncontact specular microscope (EM - 3000; TOMEY: VERSION 2A/OJ) will be used to calculate the endothelial cell density, coefficient of variation of cell size, percentage of hexagonal cells and corneal thickness before surgery and 1day, 1 week, 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months visits after surgery. 3 endothelial cell photographs will be taken at each visit and the mean cell count of three photographs will be calculated. Counts will be performed by an observer blinded to which procedure the patient had undergone. Endothelial cell loss will be calculated as a percentage of pre operative cell density
Time Frame
1 day,1week,months 1,3,6,9,12
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
change in Intraocular pressure from baseline
Description
Intraocular pressure will be measured using applanation tonometer.
Time Frame
1day,1week,months1,3,6,9,12
Title
visual acuity
Description
snellens visual acuity will be converted to Logmar scale and recorded with and without spectacle correction
Time Frame
1 month
Title
posterior capsular rupture
Description
any incidence of posterior capsular rupture during surgery would be noted
Time Frame
day 0 of surgery

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
40 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Patients of >40yrs will be included in the study. Grade 0.1-6.0 (LOCS III grading) of senile cataract. Exclusion Criteria: Patients with pre-operative endothelial cell density count less than 1500cells/mm2. All eye pathologies that can compromise the visual recovery. Eyes with any kind of corneal dystrophy or corneal scars preventing visualisation of cataract for reliable grading. Raised intraocular pressure (> 21 mmHg). Previous intraocular surgery.
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Taru Dewan, MS FRCSEd
Phone
0091-9810673180
Email
tarudewan@hotmail.com
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Praveen K Malik, MS
Phone
0091-9810405681
Email
praveenk002@yahoo.com
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Taru Dewan, MS FRCSEd
Organizational Affiliation
Dr. R.M.L.Hospital,New Delhi,India
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Dr. R.M.L.Hospital,
City
New Delhi
State/Province
Delhi
ZIP/Postal Code
110001
Country
India
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Taru Dewan, MS,FRCSEd
Phone
0091-9810673180
Email
tarudewan@hotmail.com
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Praveen K Malik, MS
Phone
009109810405681
Email
praveenk002@yahoo.com
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Taru Dewan, MS FRCSEd

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

Effect of Minimising Ultrasound Power to 1% During Cataract Surgery on Corneal Endothelium.

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs