search
Back to results

Study Comparing Short Term Efficacy of Dysport and Dysport NG to Placebo, and to Assess Efficacy and Safety of Dysport NG of Subjects With Cervical Dystonia

Primary Purpose

Cervical Dystonia

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Botulinum toxin type A
Botulinum toxin type A
Placebo
Sponsored by
Ipsen
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Cervical Dystonia

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Dystonia with at least 18 months duration since onset.
  • Previously untreated with Botulinum toxin-A (BTX-A) or -B or a minimum of 14 weeks since the last injection.
  • TWSTRS score at baseline of: Total score ≥ 30, Severity Sub-Scale score ≥ 15, Disability Sub-Scale score ≥ 3, Pain Sub-Scale score ≥ 2.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known hypersensitivity to Botulinum toxin (BTX) or related compounds or any component in the study drug formulation (including cow milk protein).
  • Pure anterocollis or pure retrocollis.
  • In apparent remission from Cervical Dystonia.
  • Known clinically significant underlying swallowing or respiratory abnormality which might be exacerbated by BTX treatment.
  • Previous poor response to BTX treatment or known presence of BTX neutralising antibodies.
  • Previous phenol or alcohol injections into the neck muscles.
  • Previous myotomy or denervation surgery involving the neck or shoulder region.

Sites / Locations

  • Monash Medical Centre
  • Austin Hospital
  • Department of Neurosciences Alfred Hospital
  • Westmead Hospital
  • Univ.-Klinik für Neurologie
  • Univ.-Klinik für Neurologie
  • AZ St. Jan
  • Universitair Ziekenhuis Antwerpen
  • AZ Sint Lucas
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège
  • HH Ziekenhuis
  • Fakultni nemocnice Brno
  • Pardubicka krajska nemocnice
  • RESEARCH SITE s.r.o.
  • Vseobecna fakultni nemocnice v Praze
  • CHU Amiens
  • Hopital Neurologique
  • CHU Caremeau
  • CHU Bordeaux
  • CHU Strasbourg
  • Hopital Purpan
  • Neurologische Klinik u. Poliklinik
  • Neurologische Klinik u. Poliklinik
  • Neurologische Klinik
  • Neurologische Klinik
  • Neurologische Klinik
  • Neurologische Klinik
  • Neurologische Klinik
  • Neurologische Klinik
  • Neurologische Klinik
  • Neurologische Klinik
  • Semmelweis Egyetem
  • Jósa András Oktató Kórház Nonprofit Kft.
  • Pécsi Tudományegyetem
  • Szegedi Tudományegyetem Szent-Györgyi Albert Klinikai Központ
  • Pomorskie Centrum Traumatologii im. M. Kopernika w Gdansku
  • Specjalistyczna Praktyka Lekarska
  • Malopolskie Centrum Medyczne
  • Gabinet Lekarski
  • Niepubliczny Zaklad Opieki Zdrowotnej
  • Samodzielny Publiczny Centralny Szpital Kliniczny
  • Hospital Santa Maria
  • Hospital Geral de Santo Antonio
  • Research Medical Complex "Vashe Zdorovie"
  • Research Center of Neurology of RAMS
  • Nizhniy Novgorod Research Institute for Traumatology and Orthopaedics
  • Samara Regional Clinical Hospital
  • Smolensk State Medical Academy Smolensk Regional Clinical Hospital
  • Russian Medical Military Academy n.a. S.M.Kirov
  • Bukovinian Medical State University
  • Ukrainian State Institute of Medical and Social Problems of Disability
  • Donetsk Railroad Clinical Hospital
  • Institute of Neurology, Psychiatry and Narcology AMS of Ukraine
  • Lviv Regional Clinical Hospital
  • Municipal Institution "Odesa Regional Clinical Hospital"
  • Uzhgorod National University
  • Vinnytsya National Medical University

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Placebo Comparator

Arm Label

Dysport NG

Dysport

Placebo

Arm Description

500U (1mL) administered as intramuscular injection on day 1 of treatment cycle 1 and 2. 250U (0.5mL), 500U (1mL) or 750U (1.5mL) administered as intramuscular injection on day 1 of treatment cycle 3. 250U (0.5mL), 500U (1mL), 750U (1.5mL) or 1000U (2mL) administered as intramuscular injection on day 1 of treatment cycle 4 and 5.

500U (1mL) injected as intramuscular injection on day 1 of treatment cycle 1.

1mL administered as, intramuscular injection on day 1 of treatment cycle 1.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Change From Baseline in Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) Total Score Following First Treatment Cycle
TWSTRS measures the degree of CD and is comprised of three different components, namely Severity, Disability and Pain subscales. There is an ordinal scale score and range for each component. Severity scores range from 0 (absence of severity) to 35 (maximum severity), Disability scores range from 0 (no disability) to 30 (maximum disability) and Pain scores range from 0 (no pain) to 20 (maximum pain). TWSTRS Total score is the sum of the 3 component scores ranging from 0 to a maximum of 85, with higher scores denoting worse outcome. If the change from baseline is negative, this represents an improvement in symptoms.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Change From Baseline in Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) Severity Subscale Score Following First Treatment Cycle
TWSTRS measures the degree of CD and comprises three different components, one of which is the Severity subscale. TWSTRS Severity subscale scores range from 0 (absence of severity) to 35 (maximum severity). If the change from baseline is negative, this represents an improvement in symptoms.
Change From Baseline in Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) Disability Subscale Score Following First Treatment Cycle
TWSTRS measures the degree of CD and comprises three different components, one of which is the Disability subscale. TWSTRS Disability subscale scores range from 0 (no disability) to 30 (maximum disability). If the change from baseline is negative, this represents an improvement in symptoms.
Change From Baseline in Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) Pain Subscale Score Following First Treatment Cycle
TWSTRS measures the degree of CD and comprises three different components, one of which is the Pain subscale. TWSTRS Pain subscale scores range from 0 (no pain) to 20 (maximum pain). If the change from baseline is negative, this represents an improvement in symptoms.
Change From Baseline in Subject Visual Analogue Score (VAS) for Pain From Cervical Dystonia Following First Treatment Cycle
The assessment was made on a continuous 100-mm horizontal line with a scale range of 0 mm (no pain) to 100 mm (worst possible pain).
Change From Baseline in Subject Visual Analogue Score (VAS) for Symptoms of Cervical Dystonia Following First Treatment Cycle
The assessment was made on a continuous 100-mm horizontal line with a scale range of 0 mm (no symptoms) to 100 mm (worst possible symptoms).
Percentage of Treatment Responders Following First Treatment Cycle
A treatment responder was defined as a patient with >30% improvement in TWSTRS Total score compared to baseline. TWSTRS measures the degree of CD and is comprised of three different components, namely Severity, Disability and Pain subscales. There is an ordinal scale score and range for each component. Severity scores range from 0 (absence of severity) to 35 (maximum severity), Disability scores range from 0 (no disability) to 30 (maximum disability) and Pain scores range from 0 (no pain) to 20 (maximum pain). TWSTRS Total score is the sum of the 3 component scores ranging from 0 to a maximum of 85, with higher scores denoting worse outcome. If the change from baseline is negative, this represents an improvement in symptoms.
Change From Baseline in Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) Total Score for Treatment Cycles 2 to 5
TWSTRS measures the degree of CD and is comprised of three different components, namely Severity, Disability and Pain subscales. There is an ordinal scale score and range for each component. Severity scores range from 0 (absence of severity) to 35 (maximum severity), Disability scores range from 0 (no disability) to 30 (maximum disability) and Pain scores range from 0 (no pain) to 20 (maximum pain). TWSTRS Total score is the sum of the 3 component scores ranging from 0 to a maximum of 85, with higher scores denoting worse outcome. If the change from baseline is negative, this represents an improvement in symptoms.
Change From Baseline in Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) Severity Score for Treatment Cycles 2 to 5
TWSTRS measures the degree of CD and comprises three different components, one of which is the Severity subscale. TWSTRS Severity subscale scores range from 0 (absence of severity) to 35 (maximum severity). If the change from baseline is negative, this represents an improvement in symptoms.
Change From Baseline in Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) Disability Score for Treatment Cycles 2 to 5
TWSTRS measures the degree of CD and comprises three different components, one of which is the Disability subscale. TWSTRS Disability subscale scores range from 0 (no disability) to 30 (maximum disability). If the change from baseline is negative, this represents an improvement in symptoms.
Change From Baseline in Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) Pain Subscale Score for Treatment Cycles 2 to 5
TWSTRS measures the degree of CD and comprises three different components, one of which is the Pain subscale. TWSTRS Pain subscale scores range from 0 (no pain) to 20 (maximum pain). If the change from baseline is negative, this represents an improvement in symptoms.
Change From Baseline in Subject Visual Analogue Score (VAS) for Pain From Cervical Dystonia for Treatment Cycles 2 to 5
The assessment was made on a continuous 100-mm horizontal line with a scale range of 0 mm (no pain) to 100 mm (worst possible pain).
Change From Baseline in Subject Visual Analogue Score (VAS) for Symptoms of Cervical Dystonia for Treatment Cycles 2 to 5
The assessment was made on a continuous 100-mm horizontal line with a scale of 0 mm (no symptoms) to 100 mm (worst possible symptoms).
Percentage of Treatment Responders for Treatment Cycles 2 to 5
A treatment responder was defined as a patient with >30% improvement in TWSTRS Total score compared to baseline. TWSTRS measures the degree of CD and is comprised of three different components, namely Severity, Disability and Pain subscales. There is an ordinal scale score and range for each component. Severity scores range from 0 (absence of severity) to 35 (maximum severity), Disability scores range from 0 (no disability) to 30 (maximum disability) and Pain scores range from 0 (no pain) to 20 (maximum pain). TWSTRS Total score is the sum of the 3 component scores ranging from 0 to a maximum of 85, with higher scores denoting worse outcome. If the change from baseline is negative, this represents an improvement in symptoms.

Full Information

First Posted
December 15, 2010
Last Updated
September 15, 2022
Sponsor
Ipsen
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01261611
Brief Title
Study Comparing Short Term Efficacy of Dysport and Dysport NG to Placebo, and to Assess Efficacy and Safety of Dysport NG of Subjects With Cervical Dystonia
Official Title
A Phase III, Randomised, Double-blind and Open Label Phase, Active and Placebo Controlled Study Comparing the Short-term Efficacy of Two Formulations of Clostridium Botulinum Type A Toxin (Dysport and Dysport NG) to Placebo, and Assessing the Short and Long Term Efficacy and Safety of Dysport NG Following Repeated Treatments of Subjects With Cervical Dystonia
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
September 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
April 2011 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
May 2012 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
June 2013 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Ipsen

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate how well a new drug called Dysport NG works and how safe it is, when it is used for the treatment of cervical dystonia. Dysport NG will be compared to an approved drug called Dysport.
Detailed Description
The primary study objectives will be assessed in terms of improvement of the subject's CD at a pre-defined time point after treatment. The primary study objectives are to demonstrate the superiority of Dysport NG to placebo in terms of efficacy and to test the non-inferior efficacy of Dysport NG, when compared to Dysport, in CD subjects. In addition to testing for the primary study objectives, the superiority in terms of efficacy of Dysport versus placebo, will be assessed. This clinical study was designed and implemented and reported in accordance with the International Conference on Harmonization (ICH) Harmonized Tripartite Guidelines for Good Clinical Practice (GCP), with applicable local regulations (including European Directive 2001/20/EC, US Code of Federal Regulations Title 21, and with the ethical principles laid down in the Declaration of Helsinki. A large body of evidence demonstrates the safety and efficacy of Dysport across several clinical indications. This study was the first use of Dysport NG in humans with CD. The active substance (BTX-A-HAC) in Dysport NG was the same as in the currently marketed Dysport product and had the same mechanism of action. Dysport NG was, therefore, expected to have the same efficacy and safety profile in humans as Dysport, with the advantage of eliminating the potential risk of transmission of infective agents, by the substitution of plant and synthetic products for human and animal-derived products. However, due to the change of excipient, thorough assessment of the safety and efficacy of Dysport NG is necessary. Previous clinical studies indicate that the maximum effect of Dysport and maximum improvements in CD are observed approximately 4 weeks post treatment, after which there is a gradual return to baseline disease status. The Week 4 follow up visit after the first treatment cycle was therefore, chosen as the primary time point of interest. Retreatment is necessary in order to maintain the beneficial effect and the long term treatment of CD. Previously conducted long term studies demonstrate the maintenance of the therapeutic effect of Dysport following repeated treatments, with a favourable short and long term safety and immunogenicity profile.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Cervical Dystonia

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
382 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Dysport NG
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
500U (1mL) administered as intramuscular injection on day 1 of treatment cycle 1 and 2. 250U (0.5mL), 500U (1mL) or 750U (1.5mL) administered as intramuscular injection on day 1 of treatment cycle 3. 250U (0.5mL), 500U (1mL), 750U (1.5mL) or 1000U (2mL) administered as intramuscular injection on day 1 of treatment cycle 4 and 5.
Arm Title
Dysport
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
500U (1mL) injected as intramuscular injection on day 1 of treatment cycle 1.
Arm Title
Placebo
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
1mL administered as, intramuscular injection on day 1 of treatment cycle 1.
Intervention Type
Biological
Intervention Name(s)
Botulinum toxin type A
Other Intervention Name(s)
AbobotulinumtoxinA (DysportRU®)
Intervention Description
I.M. (in the muscle) injection on day 1 of up to 5 treatment cycles.
Intervention Type
Biological
Intervention Name(s)
Botulinum toxin type A
Other Intervention Name(s)
AbobotulinumtoxinA (Dysport®)
Intervention Description
I.M. injection on day 1 of treatment cycle 1.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Placebo
Intervention Description
I.M. injection on day 1 of treatment cycle 1.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change From Baseline in Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) Total Score Following First Treatment Cycle
Description
TWSTRS measures the degree of CD and is comprised of three different components, namely Severity, Disability and Pain subscales. There is an ordinal scale score and range for each component. Severity scores range from 0 (absence of severity) to 35 (maximum severity), Disability scores range from 0 (no disability) to 30 (maximum disability) and Pain scores range from 0 (no pain) to 20 (maximum pain). TWSTRS Total score is the sum of the 3 component scores ranging from 0 to a maximum of 85, with higher scores denoting worse outcome. If the change from baseline is negative, this represents an improvement in symptoms.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 4
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change From Baseline in Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) Severity Subscale Score Following First Treatment Cycle
Description
TWSTRS measures the degree of CD and comprises three different components, one of which is the Severity subscale. TWSTRS Severity subscale scores range from 0 (absence of severity) to 35 (maximum severity). If the change from baseline is negative, this represents an improvement in symptoms.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 4
Title
Change From Baseline in Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) Disability Subscale Score Following First Treatment Cycle
Description
TWSTRS measures the degree of CD and comprises three different components, one of which is the Disability subscale. TWSTRS Disability subscale scores range from 0 (no disability) to 30 (maximum disability). If the change from baseline is negative, this represents an improvement in symptoms.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 4
Title
Change From Baseline in Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) Pain Subscale Score Following First Treatment Cycle
Description
TWSTRS measures the degree of CD and comprises three different components, one of which is the Pain subscale. TWSTRS Pain subscale scores range from 0 (no pain) to 20 (maximum pain). If the change from baseline is negative, this represents an improvement in symptoms.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 4
Title
Change From Baseline in Subject Visual Analogue Score (VAS) for Pain From Cervical Dystonia Following First Treatment Cycle
Description
The assessment was made on a continuous 100-mm horizontal line with a scale range of 0 mm (no pain) to 100 mm (worst possible pain).
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 4
Title
Change From Baseline in Subject Visual Analogue Score (VAS) for Symptoms of Cervical Dystonia Following First Treatment Cycle
Description
The assessment was made on a continuous 100-mm horizontal line with a scale range of 0 mm (no symptoms) to 100 mm (worst possible symptoms).
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 4
Title
Percentage of Treatment Responders Following First Treatment Cycle
Description
A treatment responder was defined as a patient with >30% improvement in TWSTRS Total score compared to baseline. TWSTRS measures the degree of CD and is comprised of three different components, namely Severity, Disability and Pain subscales. There is an ordinal scale score and range for each component. Severity scores range from 0 (absence of severity) to 35 (maximum severity), Disability scores range from 0 (no disability) to 30 (maximum disability) and Pain scores range from 0 (no pain) to 20 (maximum pain). TWSTRS Total score is the sum of the 3 component scores ranging from 0 to a maximum of 85, with higher scores denoting worse outcome. If the change from baseline is negative, this represents an improvement in symptoms.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 4
Title
Change From Baseline in Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) Total Score for Treatment Cycles 2 to 5
Description
TWSTRS measures the degree of CD and is comprised of three different components, namely Severity, Disability and Pain subscales. There is an ordinal scale score and range for each component. Severity scores range from 0 (absence of severity) to 35 (maximum severity), Disability scores range from 0 (no disability) to 30 (maximum disability) and Pain scores range from 0 (no pain) to 20 (maximum pain). TWSTRS Total score is the sum of the 3 component scores ranging from 0 to a maximum of 85, with higher scores denoting worse outcome. If the change from baseline is negative, this represents an improvement in symptoms.
Time Frame
Treatment cycle Baseline and Week 4
Title
Change From Baseline in Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) Severity Score for Treatment Cycles 2 to 5
Description
TWSTRS measures the degree of CD and comprises three different components, one of which is the Severity subscale. TWSTRS Severity subscale scores range from 0 (absence of severity) to 35 (maximum severity). If the change from baseline is negative, this represents an improvement in symptoms.
Time Frame
Treatment cycle Baseline and Week 4
Title
Change From Baseline in Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) Disability Score for Treatment Cycles 2 to 5
Description
TWSTRS measures the degree of CD and comprises three different components, one of which is the Disability subscale. TWSTRS Disability subscale scores range from 0 (no disability) to 30 (maximum disability). If the change from baseline is negative, this represents an improvement in symptoms.
Time Frame
Treatment cycle Baseline and Week 4
Title
Change From Baseline in Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) Pain Subscale Score for Treatment Cycles 2 to 5
Description
TWSTRS measures the degree of CD and comprises three different components, one of which is the Pain subscale. TWSTRS Pain subscale scores range from 0 (no pain) to 20 (maximum pain). If the change from baseline is negative, this represents an improvement in symptoms.
Time Frame
Treatment cycle Baseline and Week 4
Title
Change From Baseline in Subject Visual Analogue Score (VAS) for Pain From Cervical Dystonia for Treatment Cycles 2 to 5
Description
The assessment was made on a continuous 100-mm horizontal line with a scale range of 0 mm (no pain) to 100 mm (worst possible pain).
Time Frame
Treatment cycle Baseline and Week 4
Title
Change From Baseline in Subject Visual Analogue Score (VAS) for Symptoms of Cervical Dystonia for Treatment Cycles 2 to 5
Description
The assessment was made on a continuous 100-mm horizontal line with a scale of 0 mm (no symptoms) to 100 mm (worst possible symptoms).
Time Frame
Treatment cycle Baseline and Week 4
Title
Percentage of Treatment Responders for Treatment Cycles 2 to 5
Description
A treatment responder was defined as a patient with >30% improvement in TWSTRS Total score compared to baseline. TWSTRS measures the degree of CD and is comprised of three different components, namely Severity, Disability and Pain subscales. There is an ordinal scale score and range for each component. Severity scores range from 0 (absence of severity) to 35 (maximum severity), Disability scores range from 0 (no disability) to 30 (maximum disability) and Pain scores range from 0 (no pain) to 20 (maximum pain). TWSTRS Total score is the sum of the 3 component scores ranging from 0 to a maximum of 85, with higher scores denoting worse outcome. If the change from baseline is negative, this represents an improvement in symptoms.
Time Frame
Treatment cycle Baseline and Week 4

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Dystonia with at least 18 months duration since onset. Previously untreated with Botulinum toxin-A (BTX-A) or -B or a minimum of 14 weeks since the last injection. TWSTRS score at baseline of: Total score ≥ 30, Severity Sub-Scale score ≥ 15, Disability Sub-Scale score ≥ 3, Pain Sub-Scale score ≥ 2. Exclusion Criteria: Known hypersensitivity to Botulinum toxin (BTX) or related compounds or any component in the study drug formulation (including cow milk protein). Pure anterocollis or pure retrocollis. In apparent remission from Cervical Dystonia. Known clinically significant underlying swallowing or respiratory abnormality which might be exacerbated by BTX treatment. Previous poor response to BTX treatment or known presence of BTX neutralising antibodies. Previous phenol or alcohol injections into the neck muscles. Previous myotomy or denervation surgery involving the neck or shoulder region.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Ipsen Medical Director
Organizational Affiliation
Ipsen
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Monash Medical Centre
City
Clayton
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Austin Hospital
City
Heidelberg
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Department of Neurosciences Alfred Hospital
City
Prahran
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Westmead Hospital
City
Westmead
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Univ.-Klinik für Neurologie
City
Innsbruck
Country
Austria
Facility Name
Univ.-Klinik für Neurologie
City
Wien
Country
Austria
Facility Name
AZ St. Jan
City
Brugge
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
Universitair Ziekenhuis Antwerpen
City
Edegem
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
AZ Sint Lucas
City
Gent
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège
City
Liège
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
HH Ziekenhuis
City
Roeselare
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
Fakultni nemocnice Brno
City
Brno
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
Pardubicka krajska nemocnice
City
Pardubice
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
RESEARCH SITE s.r.o.
City
Plzen
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
Vseobecna fakultni nemocnice v Praze
City
Praha
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
CHU Amiens
City
Amiens
Country
France
Facility Name
Hopital Neurologique
City
Bron
Country
France
Facility Name
CHU Caremeau
City
Nîmes
Country
France
Facility Name
CHU Bordeaux
City
Pessac
Country
France
Facility Name
CHU Strasbourg
City
Strasbourg
Country
France
Facility Name
Hopital Purpan
City
Toulouse
Country
France
Facility Name
Neurologische Klinik u. Poliklinik
City
Berlin
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Neurologische Klinik u. Poliklinik
City
Bonn
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Neurologische Klinik
City
Düsseldorf
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Neurologische Klinik
City
Halle
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Neurologische Klinik
City
Hannover
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Neurologische Klinik
City
Leipzig
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Neurologische Klinik
City
München
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Neurologische Klinik
City
Tübingen
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Neurologische Klinik
City
Wiesbaden
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Neurologische Klinik
City
Würzburg
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Semmelweis Egyetem
City
Budapest
Country
Hungary
Facility Name
Jósa András Oktató Kórház Nonprofit Kft.
City
Nyíregyháza
Country
Hungary
Facility Name
Pécsi Tudományegyetem
City
Pécs
Country
Hungary
Facility Name
Szegedi Tudományegyetem Szent-Györgyi Albert Klinikai Központ
City
Szeged
Country
Hungary
Facility Name
Pomorskie Centrum Traumatologii im. M. Kopernika w Gdansku
City
Gdansk
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Specjalistyczna Praktyka Lekarska
City
Katowice
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Malopolskie Centrum Medyczne
City
Krakow
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Gabinet Lekarski
City
Lodz
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Niepubliczny Zaklad Opieki Zdrowotnej
City
Poznan
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Samodzielny Publiczny Centralny Szpital Kliniczny
City
Warszawa
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Hospital Santa Maria
City
Lisboa
Country
Portugal
Facility Name
Hospital Geral de Santo Antonio
City
Porto
Country
Portugal
Facility Name
Research Medical Complex "Vashe Zdorovie"
City
Kazan
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Research Center of Neurology of RAMS
City
Moscow
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Nizhniy Novgorod Research Institute for Traumatology and Orthopaedics
City
Nizhniy Novgorod
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Samara Regional Clinical Hospital
City
Samara
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Smolensk State Medical Academy Smolensk Regional Clinical Hospital
City
Smolensk
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Russian Medical Military Academy n.a. S.M.Kirov
City
St. Petersburg
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Bukovinian Medical State University
City
Chernivtsi
Country
Ukraine
Facility Name
Ukrainian State Institute of Medical and Social Problems of Disability
City
Dnipropetrovsk
Country
Ukraine
Facility Name
Donetsk Railroad Clinical Hospital
City
Donetsk
Country
Ukraine
Facility Name
Institute of Neurology, Psychiatry and Narcology AMS of Ukraine
City
Kharkiv
Country
Ukraine
Facility Name
Lviv Regional Clinical Hospital
City
Lviv
Country
Ukraine
Facility Name
Municipal Institution "Odesa Regional Clinical Hospital"
City
Odessa
Country
Ukraine
Facility Name
Uzhgorod National University
City
Uzhgorod
Country
Ukraine
Facility Name
Vinnytsya National Medical University
City
Vinnytsya
Country
Ukraine

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Yes
IPD Sharing Plan Description
Qualified researchers may request access to patient level data and related study documents including the clinical study report, study protocol with any amendments, annotated case report form, statistical analysis plan, and dataset specifications. Patient level data will be anonymized, and study documents will be redacted to protect the privacy of study participants. Any requests should be submitted to www.vivli.org for assessment by an independent scientific review board.
IPD Sharing Time Frame
Where applicable, data from eligible studies are available 6 months after the studied medicine and indication have been approved in the US and EU or after the primary manuscript describing the results has been accepted for publication, whichever is later.
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
Further details on Ipsen's sharing criteria, eligible studies and process for sharing are available here (https://vivli.org/members/ourmembers/).
IPD Sharing URL
https://vivli.org/members/ourmembers/
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
27653448
Citation
Poewe W, Burbaud P, Castelnovo G, Jost WH, Ceballos-Baumann AO, Banach M, Potulska-Chromik A, Ferreira JJ, Bihari K, Ehler E, Bares M, Dzyak LA, Belova AN, Pham E, Liu WJ, Picaut P. Efficacy and safety of abobotulinumtoxinA liquid formulation in cervical dystonia: A randomized-controlled trial. Mov Disord. 2016 Nov;31(11):1649-1657. doi: 10.1002/mds.26760. Epub 2016 Sep 21.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Study Comparing Short Term Efficacy of Dysport and Dysport NG to Placebo, and to Assess Efficacy and Safety of Dysport NG of Subjects With Cervical Dystonia

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs