A Randomized Trial of Medical and Surgical Treatments for Patients With GERD Symptoms That Are Refractory to Proton Pump Inhibitors
Primary Purpose
GERD
Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Nissen fundoplication
baclofen
Desipramine
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for GERD
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age 18-70 years
- History of heartburn (defined as a burning sensation in the retrosternal area of the chest) that is refractory to antisecretory medications
Initial GERD-HRQL:
- Total score must be at least 6 and at least one of the six heartburn questions must be scored at least 2
GERD-HRQL after two weeks of treatment with omeprazole:
- Total score must be >50% of the initial GERD-HRQL score and at least one of the six heartburn questions must be scored at least 2
Either or both of the following by baseline esophageal pH/multichannel intraluminal impedance (MII) monitoring in patients on omeprazole 20 mg two times a day (BID):
- Positive symptom association probability (SAP) (>95%) for acid reflux, non-acid reflux or all reflux.
- Abnormal acid reflux (esophageal pH<4 for at least 4.2% of the 24-hour monitoring period)
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients who do not have heartburn, defined as a burning sensation in the chest
- Patients unwilling or unable to provide informed consent
- Pregnancy or women unwilling to use effective contraception
- Age <18 or >70 years
- History of surgery on the stomach or esophagus
- History of seizure disorder
- History of heart block
- Allergy to or previous inability to tolerate study medications (omeprazole, baclofen, desipramine)
- Esophageal varices
- Cirrhosis
- Co-morbidity of sufficient severity to preclude elective surgery (e.g. pulmonary, cardiac, renal, liver disease)
- History of disorders that can cause medically-refractory "GERD symptoms" (eosinophilic esophagitis, neoplasms of the upper gastrointestinal tract, gastroparesis, achalasia)
- Myocardial infarction within the past 6 months
- History of schizophrenia
- Current use of clopidogrel
- Patients who have a contraindication to omeprazole or baclofen or who require therapy with a medication that has a clinically important drug interaction with omeprazole or baclofen.
- Patients who, in the judgment of the PI, are not suitable candidates for therapy with a study medication (omeprazole, baclofen, desipramine)
- Initial GERD-HRQL score: Total score <6 and/or all heartburn scores <2
- Inability to tolerate omeprazole during the 2-week treatment phase (before randomization)
- GERD-HRQL after two weeks of treatment with omeprazole: Total score less than or equal to 50% of initial GERD-HRQL score and/or all heartburn scores <2
Laboratory abnormalities including:
- Platelet count <100,000
- international normalized ratio (INR) >1.5 (off anticoagulants)
- Serum creatinine >2.0 mg per deciliter
Endoscopic abnormalities including:
- Los Angeles Classification of Oesophagitis (LA grade) C or D reflux esophagitis
- Active ulceration of the esophagus that is not due to reflux esophagitis
- Candida esophagitis
- Esophageal varices
- Active ulceration of the stomach and/or duodenum
- Neoplasm of the esophagus, stomach or duodenum
- Gastric outlet obstruction
- Eosinophilic esophagitis at least (15 eosinophils per high power field in any esophageal biopsy specimen)
Manometric abnormalities including:
- Achalasia
- Complete aperistalsis
- Negative SAP ( 95%) for acid reflux, non-acid reflux and all reflux on baseline combined esophageal pH/MII monitoring and normal acid reflux (esophageal pH<4 for <4.2% of the 24-hour monitoring period)
- Study surgeon identifies a contraindication to laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication
- Morbid obesity (BMI at least 40)
- Large paraesophageal hernia
Sites / Locations
- Birmingham VA Medical Center, Birmingham, AL
- Southern Arizona VA Health Care System, Tucson, AZ
- VA Loma Linda Healthcare System, Loma Linda, CA
- VA Long Beach Healthcare System, Long Beach, CA
- VA Connecticut Healthcare System West Haven Campus, West Haven, CT
- Baltimore VA Medical Center VA Maryland Health Care System, Baltimore, MD
- VA Boston Healthcare System Jamaica Plain Campus, Jamaica Plain, MA
- VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI
- Kansas City VA Medical Center, Kansas City, MO
- Syracuse VA Medical Center, Syracuse, NY
- Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, NC
- Salisbury W.G. (Bill) Hefner VA Medical Center, Salisbury, NC
- VA North Texas Health Care System Dallas VA Medical Center, Dallas, TX
- Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, TX
- VA Puget Sound Health Care System Seattle Division, Seattle, WA
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm 3
Arm Type
Other
Other
Other
Arm Label
Medical Treatment Group
Surgical Treatment Group
Placebo Medical Treatment Group
Arm Description
Omeprazole or Omeprazole + baclofen or Omeprazole + desipramine
Laparoscopic nissen fundoplications
Omeprazole + placebo
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Number of Participants Achieving at Least a 50% Improvement in the Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Health-related Quality of Life Index (GERD-HRQL) From Baseline to 12 Months
Success; ≥50% improvement in the baseline GERD-HRQL score at 12 months.
Failure; <50% improvement in the baseline GERD-HRQL score at 12 months or:
For patients randomized to Surgical Treatment: a.<50% improvement in the baseline GERD-HRQL score and/or persistent heartburn of sufficient severity to warrant treatment with any antisecretory medication, antireflux medication or neurotropic medication at any quarterly clinic visit.
For patients randomized to Active Medical or Placebo Medical Treatment:
a.inability to tolerate both study medications or b.For patients treated with desipramine, i.<50% improvement in baseline GERD-HRQL score symptom after at least 10 weeks of treatment with the second drug at any quarterly clinic visit. c.For patients in whom desipramine is contraindicated,i.<50% improvement in baseline GERD-HRQL score symptom after at least 10 weeks of treatment with baclofen or its corresponding placebo at any quarterly clinic visit.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Number of Enrolled Participants With Esophageal Ulceration.
Number of Enrolled Participants With Reflux Esophagus.
Number of Enrolled Participants With Eosinophilic Esophagitis
Number of Enrolled Participants With Active Ulceration of the Stomach and/or Duodenum.
Number of Enrolled Participants With Neoplasm of the Esophagus, Stomach or Duodenum
Number of Enrolled Participants With Candida Esophagitis.
Number of Enrolled Participants With Gastric Outlet Obstruction
Number of Enrolled Participants With Achalasia
Number of Enrolled Participants With Aperistalsis
Number of Enrolled Participants With Distal Esophageal Spasm
Number of Enrolled Participants With Nutcracker Esophagus
Number of Enrolled Participants With Ineffective Esophageal Motility
Number of Enrolled Participants With Rapid Contraction
Number of Enrolled Participants With Hypertensive Peristalsis
Number of Enrolled Participants With Jackhammer Esophagus
Number of Enrolled Participants With Weak Peristalsis I
Number of Enrolled Participants With Weak Peristalsis II
Number of Enrolled Participants With Anxiety and/or Depression
Number of Enrolled Participants With Functional Heartburn
Number of Enrolled Participants With Functional Chest Pain of Presumed Esophageal Origin
Number of Enrolled Participants With Functional Dysphagia
Number of Enrolled Participants With Globus
Number of Enrolled Participants With Belching Disorders
Number of Enrolled Participants With Chronic Idiopathic Nausea
Number of Enrolled Participants With Functional Vomiting
Number of Enrolled Participants With Cyclic Vomiting Syndrome
Number of Enrolled Participants With Irritable Bowel Syndrome
Number of Enrolled Participants With Functional Bloating
Number of Enrolled Participants With Functional Diarrhea
Number of Enrolled Participants With Unspecified Functional Bowel Disorder
Number of Enrolled Participants With Functional Gallbladder Disorder
Number of Successful Participants With Anxiety and/or Depression.
Association between anxiety and/or depression (GAD-7 and PHQ-9) and the outcome of medical and surgical treatments (success or failure) will be evaluated.
Number of Successful Participants With Functional Heartburn
Presence of functional heartburn as assessed by the ROME III functional GI disorders questionnaire.
Number of Successful Participants With Functional Chest Pain of Presumed Esophageal Origin
Presence of functional chest pain of presumed esophageal origin as assessed by the ROME III functional GI disorders questionnaire.
Number of Successful Participants With Functional Dysphagia
Presence of functional dysphagia as assessed by the ROME III functional GI disorders questionnaire.
Number of Successful Participants With Globus
Presence of globus as assessed by the ROME III functional GI disorders questionnaire.
Number of Successful Participants With Belching Disorders
Presence of belching disorders as assessed by the ROME III functional GI disorders questionnaire.
Number of Successful Participants With Chronic Idiopathic Nausea
Presence of chronic idiopathic nausea as assessed by the ROME III functional GI disorders questionnaire.
Number of Successful Participants With Functional Vomiting
Presence of functional vomiting as assessed by the ROME III functional GI disorders questionnaire.
Number of Successful Participants With Cyclic Vomiting Syndrome
Presence of cyclic vomiting syndrome as assessed by the ROME III functional GI disorders questionnaire.
Number of Successful Participants With Irritable Bowel Syndrome
Presence of irritable bowel syndrome as assessed by the ROME III functional GI disorders questionnaire.
Number of Successful Participants With Functional Bloating
Presence of functional bloating as assessed by the ROME III functional GI disorders questionnaire.
Number of Successful Participants With Functional Diarrhea
Presence of functional diarrhea as assessed by the ROME III functional GI disorders questionnaire.
Number of Successful Participants With Unspecified Functional Bowel Disorder
Presence of unspecified functional bowel disorder as assessed by the ROME III functional GI disorders questionnaire.
Number of Successful Participants With Functional Gallbladder Disorder
Presence of functional gallbladder disorder as assessed by the ROME III functional GI disorders questionnaire.
Number of Successful Surgery Participants With Dissection of Distal Esophagus to Obtain at Least 2.5cm of Tension-free, Intra-abdominal Esophagus Performed.
Number of Successful Surgery Participants With Complete Mobilization of the Fundus, to Include All Short Gastric and Posterior Gastric Vessels to the Base of the Left Crus Performed.
Number of Successful Surgery Participants With Closure of the Crura With Non-absorbable Suture to be Snug With a Dilator of at Least 56 French Diameter Performed.
Number of Successful Surgery Participants With Passage of an Esophageal Dilator of at Least 56 French Diameter Performed.
Number of Successful Surgery Participants With Fundoplication Between 1.5 and 2.5cm in Length Performed.
Number of Successful Surgery Participants With Fundoplication Placed Above the Epiphrenic Fat Pad, Using 3 Sutures Performed.
Number of Successful Surgery Participants With Fundoplication Secured to Esophagus With at Least Two Sutures Performed.
Number of Successful Surgery Participants With Fundoplication Floppiness Demonstrated by Passing a Grasper Between Fundoplication and Dilator-filled Esophagus Performed.
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT01265550
First Posted
December 21, 2010
Last Updated
January 17, 2020
Sponsor
VA Office of Research and Development
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01265550
Brief Title
A Randomized Trial of Medical and Surgical Treatments for Patients With GERD Symptoms That Are Refractory to Proton Pump Inhibitors
Official Title
CSP #573 - A Randomized Trial of Medical and Surgical Treatments for Patients With GERD Symptoms That Are Refractory to Proton Pump Inhibitors
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
January 2020
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
August 13, 2012 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
December 30, 2016 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
December 30, 2016 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
VA Office of Research and Development
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
Background: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), which affects at least 20% of adult Americans, may be especially common and severe in Veteran patients. Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), which block gastric acid production, are the most effective medications for GERD, and the VA spends more than $177 million each year on outpatient PPI prescriptions. PPIs do not prevent the reflux of non-acidic material and do not completely eliminate esophageal acid exposure, however, and bothersome GERD symptoms persist in approximately 40% of patients treated with PPIs. Recent studies using the new technique of esophageal pH/ impedance monitoring, which detects the reflux of both acidic and non-acidic materials, have shown that PPI-resistant GERD symptoms correlate with episodes of reflux (acidic and/or non-acidic) in approximately one-half of patients. For those patients, an antireflux operation might relieve symptoms and obviate the expense of ineffective PPI therapy, but the efficacy of modern, laparoscopic fundoplication in this regard is not clear. For patients with PPI-resistant GERD symptoms, furthermore, the efficacy of medications that that can prevent gastroesophageal reflux (e.g. baclofen) or diminish pain of esophageal origin (e.g. neurotropic agents like desipramine) also is not clear. Study Hypothesis: Laparoscopic antireflux surgery (Nissen fundoplication) is superior to medical therapy (PPIs plus baclofen and desipramine) for GERD patients who, while on PPIs, have persistent episodes of heartburn that are associated with reflux episodes or with abnormal esophageal acid exposure by esophageal pH/impedance monitoring.
Study Goals: The primary goal is to compare the efficacy of laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication and medical therapy (PPIs plus baclofen and desipramine) for GERD patients who, while on PPIs, have persistent episodes of heartburn that are associated with reflux episodes or with abnormal esophageal acid exposure by esophageal pH/impedance monitoring, and to compare the efficacy of each therapy with placebo. Secondary goals are: 1) To determine the frequency with which non-GERD disorders underlie "PPI failure," 2) To determine the frequency of functional gastrointestinal symptoms, anxiety and depression in patients who have persistent heartburn while on PPIs, 3) To determine whether functional gastrointestinal symptoms, anxiety and depression is associated with the outcomes of medical and surgical therapies, and 4) To determine whether the outcome of Nissen fundoplication is associated with adherence to technical aspects of the operation.
Study Design: Up to 16 VA medical centers, there will be a 30-month recruitment period to enroll 108 patients with heartburn that is refractory to PPI therapy. Patients will have their baseline GERD symptoms scored using the GERD Health-Related Quality of Life (GERD-HRQL) index, and will have endoscopy, esophageal manometry and esophageal pH/impedance monitoring while on PPI therapy. Patients who have episodes of heartburn that are associated with reflux episodes or with abnormal esophageal acid exposure by esophageal pH/impedance monitoring will be randomized to one of three treatment groups: Surgical Treatment (laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication), Active Medical Treatment (omeprazole and baclofen initially; desipramine for baclofen failures) or Placebo Medical Treatment (omeprazole, placebo baclofen, placebo desipramine). All patients will have quarterly clinic visits for symptom scoring and laboratory testing. At one year, patients will have a final symptom scoring and repeat endoscopy, esophageal manometry and esophageal pH/impedance monitoring. Treatment success will be defined as 50% improvement in the GERD-HRQL score at 12 months. Patients also will complete the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), Rome III Functional GI Disorders Questionnaire and the Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at baseline and one year. The results will be correlated with treatment outcomes.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
GERD
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Masking Description
Partial Double Blind (Medical Treatment Groups)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
366 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Medical Treatment Group
Arm Type
Other
Arm Description
Omeprazole or Omeprazole + baclofen or Omeprazole + desipramine
Arm Title
Surgical Treatment Group
Arm Type
Other
Arm Description
Laparoscopic nissen fundoplications
Arm Title
Placebo Medical Treatment Group
Arm Type
Other
Arm Description
Omeprazole + placebo
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Nissen fundoplication
Intervention Description
laparoscopic antireflux surgery
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
baclofen
Intervention Description
Baclofen will be prescribed in a dose of 5 mg three times a day (TID) with meals.
The dose of baclofen will be increased by 5 mg TID every week until a total dose of 20 mg TID has been achieved.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Desipramine
Intervention Description
Dose of 25 mg at bedtime (HS) for 1 week, then 50 mg HS for 1 week, then 100 mg HS until the next quarterly visit.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Number of Participants Achieving at Least a 50% Improvement in the Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Health-related Quality of Life Index (GERD-HRQL) From Baseline to 12 Months
Description
Success; ≥50% improvement in the baseline GERD-HRQL score at 12 months.
Failure; <50% improvement in the baseline GERD-HRQL score at 12 months or:
For patients randomized to Surgical Treatment: a.<50% improvement in the baseline GERD-HRQL score and/or persistent heartburn of sufficient severity to warrant treatment with any antisecretory medication, antireflux medication or neurotropic medication at any quarterly clinic visit.
For patients randomized to Active Medical or Placebo Medical Treatment:
a.inability to tolerate both study medications or b.For patients treated with desipramine, i.<50% improvement in baseline GERD-HRQL score symptom after at least 10 weeks of treatment with the second drug at any quarterly clinic visit. c.For patients in whom desipramine is contraindicated,i.<50% improvement in baseline GERD-HRQL score symptom after at least 10 weeks of treatment with baclofen or its corresponding placebo at any quarterly clinic visit.
Time Frame
12 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Number of Enrolled Participants With Esophageal Ulceration.
Time Frame
Screening
Title
Number of Enrolled Participants With Reflux Esophagus.
Time Frame
Screening
Title
Number of Enrolled Participants With Eosinophilic Esophagitis
Time Frame
Screening
Title
Number of Enrolled Participants With Active Ulceration of the Stomach and/or Duodenum.
Time Frame
Screening
Title
Number of Enrolled Participants With Neoplasm of the Esophagus, Stomach or Duodenum
Time Frame
Screening
Title
Number of Enrolled Participants With Candida Esophagitis.
Time Frame
Screening
Title
Number of Enrolled Participants With Gastric Outlet Obstruction
Time Frame
Screening
Title
Number of Enrolled Participants With Achalasia
Time Frame
Screening
Title
Number of Enrolled Participants With Aperistalsis
Time Frame
Screening
Title
Number of Enrolled Participants With Distal Esophageal Spasm
Time Frame
Screening
Title
Number of Enrolled Participants With Nutcracker Esophagus
Time Frame
Screening
Title
Number of Enrolled Participants With Ineffective Esophageal Motility
Time Frame
Screening
Title
Number of Enrolled Participants With Rapid Contraction
Time Frame
Screening
Title
Number of Enrolled Participants With Hypertensive Peristalsis
Time Frame
Screening
Title
Number of Enrolled Participants With Jackhammer Esophagus
Time Frame
Screening
Title
Number of Enrolled Participants With Weak Peristalsis I
Time Frame
Screening
Title
Number of Enrolled Participants With Weak Peristalsis II
Time Frame
Screening
Title
Number of Enrolled Participants With Anxiety and/or Depression
Time Frame
Screening
Title
Number of Enrolled Participants With Functional Heartburn
Time Frame
Screening
Title
Number of Enrolled Participants With Functional Chest Pain of Presumed Esophageal Origin
Time Frame
Screening
Title
Number of Enrolled Participants With Functional Dysphagia
Time Frame
Screening
Title
Number of Enrolled Participants With Globus
Time Frame
Screening
Title
Number of Enrolled Participants With Belching Disorders
Time Frame
Screening
Title
Number of Enrolled Participants With Chronic Idiopathic Nausea
Time Frame
Screening
Title
Number of Enrolled Participants With Functional Vomiting
Time Frame
Screening
Title
Number of Enrolled Participants With Cyclic Vomiting Syndrome
Time Frame
Screening
Title
Number of Enrolled Participants With Irritable Bowel Syndrome
Time Frame
Screening
Title
Number of Enrolled Participants With Functional Bloating
Time Frame
Screening
Title
Number of Enrolled Participants With Functional Diarrhea
Time Frame
Screening
Title
Number of Enrolled Participants With Unspecified Functional Bowel Disorder
Time Frame
Screening
Title
Number of Enrolled Participants With Functional Gallbladder Disorder
Time Frame
Screening
Title
Number of Successful Participants With Anxiety and/or Depression.
Description
Association between anxiety and/or depression (GAD-7 and PHQ-9) and the outcome of medical and surgical treatments (success or failure) will be evaluated.
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Number of Successful Participants With Functional Heartburn
Description
Presence of functional heartburn as assessed by the ROME III functional GI disorders questionnaire.
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Number of Successful Participants With Functional Chest Pain of Presumed Esophageal Origin
Description
Presence of functional chest pain of presumed esophageal origin as assessed by the ROME III functional GI disorders questionnaire.
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Number of Successful Participants With Functional Dysphagia
Description
Presence of functional dysphagia as assessed by the ROME III functional GI disorders questionnaire.
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Number of Successful Participants With Globus
Description
Presence of globus as assessed by the ROME III functional GI disorders questionnaire.
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Number of Successful Participants With Belching Disorders
Description
Presence of belching disorders as assessed by the ROME III functional GI disorders questionnaire.
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Number of Successful Participants With Chronic Idiopathic Nausea
Description
Presence of chronic idiopathic nausea as assessed by the ROME III functional GI disorders questionnaire.
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Number of Successful Participants With Functional Vomiting
Description
Presence of functional vomiting as assessed by the ROME III functional GI disorders questionnaire.
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Number of Successful Participants With Cyclic Vomiting Syndrome
Description
Presence of cyclic vomiting syndrome as assessed by the ROME III functional GI disorders questionnaire.
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Number of Successful Participants With Irritable Bowel Syndrome
Description
Presence of irritable bowel syndrome as assessed by the ROME III functional GI disorders questionnaire.
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Number of Successful Participants With Functional Bloating
Description
Presence of functional bloating as assessed by the ROME III functional GI disorders questionnaire.
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Number of Successful Participants With Functional Diarrhea
Description
Presence of functional diarrhea as assessed by the ROME III functional GI disorders questionnaire.
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Number of Successful Participants With Unspecified Functional Bowel Disorder
Description
Presence of unspecified functional bowel disorder as assessed by the ROME III functional GI disorders questionnaire.
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Number of Successful Participants With Functional Gallbladder Disorder
Description
Presence of functional gallbladder disorder as assessed by the ROME III functional GI disorders questionnaire.
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Number of Successful Surgery Participants With Dissection of Distal Esophagus to Obtain at Least 2.5cm of Tension-free, Intra-abdominal Esophagus Performed.
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Number of Successful Surgery Participants With Complete Mobilization of the Fundus, to Include All Short Gastric and Posterior Gastric Vessels to the Base of the Left Crus Performed.
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Number of Successful Surgery Participants With Closure of the Crura With Non-absorbable Suture to be Snug With a Dilator of at Least 56 French Diameter Performed.
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Number of Successful Surgery Participants With Passage of an Esophageal Dilator of at Least 56 French Diameter Performed.
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Number of Successful Surgery Participants With Fundoplication Between 1.5 and 2.5cm in Length Performed.
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Number of Successful Surgery Participants With Fundoplication Placed Above the Epiphrenic Fat Pad, Using 3 Sutures Performed.
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Number of Successful Surgery Participants With Fundoplication Secured to Esophagus With at Least Two Sutures Performed.
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Number of Successful Surgery Participants With Fundoplication Floppiness Demonstrated by Passing a Grasper Between Fundoplication and Dilator-filled Esophagus Performed.
Time Frame
12 months
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
64 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Age 18-70 years
History of heartburn (defined as a burning sensation in the retrosternal area of the chest) that is refractory to antisecretory medications
Initial GERD-HRQL:
Total score must be at least 6 and at least one of the six heartburn questions must be scored at least 2
GERD-HRQL after two weeks of treatment with omeprazole:
Total score must be >50% of the initial GERD-HRQL score and at least one of the six heartburn questions must be scored at least 2
Either or both of the following by baseline esophageal pH/multichannel intraluminal impedance (MII) monitoring in patients on omeprazole 20 mg two times a day (BID):
Positive symptom association probability (SAP) (>95%) for acid reflux, non-acid reflux or all reflux.
Abnormal acid reflux (esophageal pH<4 for at least 4.2% of the 24-hour monitoring period)
Exclusion Criteria:
Patients who do not have heartburn, defined as a burning sensation in the chest
Patients unwilling or unable to provide informed consent
Pregnancy or women unwilling to use effective contraception
Age <18 or >70 years
History of surgery on the stomach or esophagus
History of seizure disorder
History of heart block
Allergy to or previous inability to tolerate study medications (omeprazole, baclofen, desipramine)
Esophageal varices
Cirrhosis
Co-morbidity of sufficient severity to preclude elective surgery (e.g. pulmonary, cardiac, renal, liver disease)
History of disorders that can cause medically-refractory "GERD symptoms" (eosinophilic esophagitis, neoplasms of the upper gastrointestinal tract, gastroparesis, achalasia)
Myocardial infarction within the past 6 months
History of schizophrenia
Current use of clopidogrel
Patients who have a contraindication to omeprazole or baclofen or who require therapy with a medication that has a clinically important drug interaction with omeprazole or baclofen.
Patients who, in the judgment of the PI, are not suitable candidates for therapy with a study medication (omeprazole, baclofen, desipramine)
Initial GERD-HRQL score: Total score <6 and/or all heartburn scores <2
Inability to tolerate omeprazole during the 2-week treatment phase (before randomization)
GERD-HRQL after two weeks of treatment with omeprazole: Total score less than or equal to 50% of initial GERD-HRQL score and/or all heartburn scores <2
Laboratory abnormalities including:
Platelet count <100,000
international normalized ratio (INR) >1.5 (off anticoagulants)
Serum creatinine >2.0 mg per deciliter
Endoscopic abnormalities including:
Los Angeles Classification of Oesophagitis (LA grade) C or D reflux esophagitis
Active ulceration of the esophagus that is not due to reflux esophagitis
Candida esophagitis
Esophageal varices
Active ulceration of the stomach and/or duodenum
Neoplasm of the esophagus, stomach or duodenum
Gastric outlet obstruction
Eosinophilic esophagitis at least (15 eosinophils per high power field in any esophageal biopsy specimen)
Manometric abnormalities including:
Achalasia
Complete aperistalsis
Negative SAP ( 95%) for acid reflux, non-acid reflux and all reflux on baseline combined esophageal pH/MII monitoring and normal acid reflux (esophageal pH<4 for <4.2% of the 24-hour monitoring period)
Study surgeon identifies a contraindication to laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication
Morbid obesity (BMI at least 40)
Large paraesophageal hernia
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Stuart J Spechler, MD
Organizational Affiliation
VA North Texas Health Care System Dallas VA Medical Center, Dallas, TX
Official's Role
Study Chair
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Birmingham VA Medical Center, Birmingham, AL
City
Birmingham
State/Province
Alabama
ZIP/Postal Code
35233
Country
United States
Facility Name
Southern Arizona VA Health Care System, Tucson, AZ
City
Tucson
State/Province
Arizona
ZIP/Postal Code
85723
Country
United States
Facility Name
VA Loma Linda Healthcare System, Loma Linda, CA
City
Loma Linda
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92357
Country
United States
Facility Name
VA Long Beach Healthcare System, Long Beach, CA
City
Long Beach
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
90822
Country
United States
Facility Name
VA Connecticut Healthcare System West Haven Campus, West Haven, CT
City
West Haven
State/Province
Connecticut
ZIP/Postal Code
06516
Country
United States
Facility Name
Baltimore VA Medical Center VA Maryland Health Care System, Baltimore, MD
City
Baltimore
State/Province
Maryland
ZIP/Postal Code
21201
Country
United States
Facility Name
VA Boston Healthcare System Jamaica Plain Campus, Jamaica Plain, MA
City
Boston
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
02130
Country
United States
Facility Name
VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI
City
Ann Arbor
State/Province
Michigan
ZIP/Postal Code
48105
Country
United States
Facility Name
Kansas City VA Medical Center, Kansas City, MO
City
Kansas City
State/Province
Missouri
ZIP/Postal Code
64128
Country
United States
Facility Name
Syracuse VA Medical Center, Syracuse, NY
City
Syracuse
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
13210
Country
United States
Facility Name
Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, NC
City
Durham
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27705
Country
United States
Facility Name
Salisbury W.G. (Bill) Hefner VA Medical Center, Salisbury, NC
City
Salisbury
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
28144
Country
United States
Facility Name
VA North Texas Health Care System Dallas VA Medical Center, Dallas, TX
City
Dallas
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
75216
Country
United States
Facility Name
Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, TX
City
Houston
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
77030
Country
United States
Facility Name
VA Puget Sound Health Care System Seattle Division, Seattle, WA
City
Seattle
State/Province
Washington
ZIP/Postal Code
98108
Country
United States
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
31618539
Citation
Spechler SJ, Hunter JG, Jones KM, Lee R, Smith BR, Mashimo H, Sanchez VM, Dunbar KB, Pham TH, Murthy UK, Kim T, Jackson CS, Wallen JM, von Rosenvinge EC, Pearl JP, Laine L, Kim AW, Kaz AM, Tatum RP, Gellad ZF, Lagoo-Deenadayalan S, Rubenstein JH, Ghaferi AA, Lo WK, Fernando RS, Chan BS, Paski SC, Provenzale D, Castell DO, Lieberman D, Souza RF, Chey WD, Warren SR, Davis-Karim A, Melton SD, Genta RM, Serpi T, Biswas K, Huang GD. Randomized Trial of Medical versus Surgical Treatment for Refractory Heartburn. N Engl J Med. 2019 Oct 17;381(16):1513-1523. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1811424.
Results Reference
derived
Learn more about this trial
A Randomized Trial of Medical and Surgical Treatments for Patients With GERD Symptoms That Are Refractory to Proton Pump Inhibitors
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs