A Trial of EVL\GVS Alone vs. EVL\GVS Combined Propranolol
Primary Purpose
Liver Cirrhosis, Hepatoma
Status
Unknown status
Phase
Phase 4
Locations
Taiwan
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
propranolol
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Liver Cirrhosis focused on measuring Variceal bleeding, portal hypertension, hepatocelluar carcinoma, endoscopic variceal ligation, non-selective beta-blocker, rebleeding
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Clinical diagnosis of HCC, endoscopically proven gastroesophageal variceal bleeding
- Aged 18 to 80
Exclusion Criteria:
- Had a terminal illness of any major organ system,such as heart failure, kidney failure, COPD
Sites / Locations
- Veteran General Hospital-TaipeiRecruiting
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
No Intervention
Active Comparator
Arm Label
EVL\GVS Alone
EVL\GVS Combined Propranolol
Arm Description
Endoscopic ligation treatment in the 2nd prevention of gastroesophageal variceal bleeding in patients with HCC
Propranolol and endoscopic ligation treatment is used for 2nd prevention of gastroesophageal variceal bleeding in patients with HCC. <EVL\GVS Combined Propranolol>
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Rebleeding
Secondary Outcome Measures
complication surivial
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT01298284
First Posted
October 4, 2010
Last Updated
June 14, 2011
Sponsor
Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01298284
Brief Title
A Trial of EVL\GVS Alone vs. EVL\GVS Combined Propranolol
Official Title
Endoscopic Treatment Alone Versus Combined Propranolol and Endoscopic Treatment of Acute Variceal Hemorrhage in Patients With HCC:a Randomized Trial
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
June 2011
Overall Recruitment Status
Unknown status
Study Start Date
October 2009 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
June 2010 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
December 2011 (Anticipated)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Name of the Sponsor
Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
New strategy to improve the outcomes in patients with HCC and acute variceal bleeding. NSBB added to endoscopic ligation may further reduce rebleeding in cirrhotic patients.
Detailed Description
Gastroesophageal vaiceal bleeding is a major complication of portal hypertension. Gastroesophageal variceal bleeding is characteristic of high rebleeding rate and mortality. Thanks to the recent advance of treatment including immediate vasoactive agents (such as somatostatin and vasopressin analogue for acute bleeding), non-selective beta-blocker (NSBB) for prevention of bleeding, prophylactic antibiotics, endoscopic variceal ligation, endoscopic cyanoacrylate injection , combination treatment and general improvement of care for patients with acute variceal bleeding, the rebleeding rate and mortality has a marked reduction. However, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a distinct group characteristic of very poor prognosis in patients in portal hypertensive patients when compared to those of liver cirrhosis only. Therefore it needs to specially clarify their treatment strategy, particularly in Taiwan, a highly prevalent area of HCC.
In patients of HCC presenting acute variceal bleeding, the rebleeding is around 50% doubled that of patients with cirrhosis only and bleeding mortality also more than 50%. The trend is not changed even after introduction of immediate use of vasoactive agents and endoscopic ligation. The poor outcome is because that HCC patients usually have arterioporal shunting or portal vein thrombosis and higher portal pressure. Moreover, their liver function deteriorated faster. Both high portal pressure and poor liver function are major determinant of hemostatic outcomes. Therefore, it is important to find a new strategy to improve the outcomes in patients with HCC and acute variceal bleeding.NSBB added to endoscopic ligation may further reduce rebleeding in cirrhotic patients. However, whether the hypotensive effect of NSBB is adequate to prevent rebleeding in patients with HCC who usually has higher portal pressure in not known. In addition, concomitant rapid deterioration of liver function might also dampen NSBB effects. Furthermore, due to faster deterioration of general condition, the tolerance of NSBB in these patients might be remarkable and lead to a higher withdrawal rate. Therefore, it is very important to clarify whether there is additive therapeutic effect of NSBB to endoscopic treatment in the 2nd prevention of gastroesophageal variceal bleeding in patients with HCC.
Therefore, the investigators design a study to randomize patients with HCC and acute variceal bleeding to endoscopic treatment alone and combination with endoscopic treatment and NSBB. This is the two years study.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Liver Cirrhosis, Hepatoma
Keywords
Variceal bleeding, portal hypertension, hepatocelluar carcinoma, endoscopic variceal ligation, non-selective beta-blocker, rebleeding
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 4
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Outcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
60 (Anticipated)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
EVL\GVS Alone
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
Endoscopic ligation treatment in the 2nd prevention of gastroesophageal variceal bleeding in patients with HCC
Arm Title
EVL\GVS Combined Propranolol
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Propranolol and endoscopic ligation treatment is used for 2nd prevention of gastroesophageal variceal bleeding in patients with HCC.
<EVL\GVS Combined Propranolol>
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
propranolol
Other Intervention Name(s)
Inderal,Cardolol
Intervention Description
Starting from 20 mg daily, titrated weekly to decrease heart rate more than 25 % of baseline, administrated during the whole study period
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Rebleeding
Time Frame
1 years
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
complication surivial
Time Frame
1 years
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
80 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Clinical diagnosis of HCC, endoscopically proven gastroesophageal variceal bleeding
Aged 18 to 80
Exclusion Criteria:
Had a terminal illness of any major organ system,such as heart failure, kidney failure, COPD
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Ming-Chih Hou, MD
Phone
886-2-28712111
Ext
3763
Email
mchou@vghtpe.gov.tw
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Han-Chieh Lin, MD
Phone
886-2-28712111
Ext
3349
Email
hclin@vghtpe.gov.tw
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Ming-Chih Hou, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Veteran General Hospital-Taipei
City
Taipei city
Country
Taiwan
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Ming-Chih Hou, MD
Phone
886-2-28712121
Ext
3763
Email
mchou@vghtpe.gov.tw
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Ming-Chih Hou, MD
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Learn more about this trial
A Trial of EVL\GVS Alone vs. EVL\GVS Combined Propranolol
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs