search
Back to results

Augment® Injectable Bone Graft Compared to Autologous Bone Graft as a Bone Regeneration Device in Hindfoot Fusions

Primary Purpose

Degenerative Joint Disease, Congenital Deformity, Arthritis

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Augment® Injectable Bone Graft
Autologous bone graft
Sponsored by
BioMimetic Therapeutics
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Degenerative Joint Disease focused on measuring degenerative joint disease, DJD, joint fusion, hindfoot, congenital deformity, osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, post-traumatic arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, Augment(tm) Injectable Bone Graft, autologous bone graft, autogenous bone graft, beta-TCP, bovine collagen, rhPDGF(bb)

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

KEY INCLUSION CRITERIA:

  • at least 18 years old and considered skeletally mature
  • diagnosed with degenerative joint disease (DJD) affecting the hindfoot due to a congenital or acquired deformity, osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, post- traumatic arthritis or ankylosing spondylitis of the ankle, subtalar, calcaneocuboid, and/or talonavicular joints
  • requires one of the following hindfoot fusion proceduress with supplemental bone graft/substitute: ankle fusion (tibiotalar), subtalar fusion (talocalcaneal), calcaneocuboid fusion, talonavicular fusion, triple arthrodesis (subtalar, talonavicular and calcaneocuboid joints) OR double fusions (any combination of any two of the following: subtalar, talonavicular and calcaneocuboid joints)
  • fusion site able to be rigidly stabilized with no more than 3 screws across the fusion site

    • supplemental pins or staples allowed
    • supplemental screws external to the fusion site(s) allowed
  • signed informed consent document, independent, ambulatory, and can comply with all post-operative evaluations and visits

KEY EXCLUSION CRITERIA:

  • undergone previous fusion surgery at the proposed location, i.e., revision of a failed fusion
  • more than one previous procedure at the involved joints
  • retained hardware spanning the joint(s) intended for fusion
  • procedure anticipated to require plate fixation (including claw plates), IM nails or more than 3 screws to achieve rigid fixation based on pre-op planning
  • procedure expected to require more than 9cc of graft material based on pre-op planning
  • procedure expected to require structural bone graft, allograft, bone graft substitute, platelet rich plasma (PRP) or bone marrow aspirate
  • procedure expected to require a pantalar fusion, i.e., fusion of ankle plus all hindfoot joints (talonavicular, subtalar, and calcaneocuboid) or an ankle fusion in combination with any hindfoot fusion
  • radiographic evidence of bone cysts, segmental defects or growth plate fracture near the fusion site that could negatively impact the proposed fusion procedure
  • tested positive or been treated for a malignancy in the past or is suspected of having a malignancy or currently undergoing radio- or chemotherapy treatment for a malignancy anywhere in the body, whether adjacent to or distant from the proposed surgical site
  • pre-existing sensory impairment, e.g., diabetics with baseline sensory impairment, which limits ability to perform objective functional measurements and may be at risk for complications

    - diabetics not sensitive to the 5.07 monofilament (Semmes-Weinstein) are to be excluded

  • metabolic disorder known to adversely affect the skeleton other than primary osteoporosis or diabetes, e.g., renal osteodystrophy or hypercalcemia
  • use of chronic medications known to affect the skeleton, e.g., glucocorticoid usage > 10mg/day
  • pre-fracture neuromuscular or musculoskeletal deficiency which limits the ability to perform objective functional measurements
  • physically or mentally compromised, e.g., current treatment for a psychiatric disorder, senile dementia, Alzheimer's disease, etc., to the extent that the Investigator judges the subject to be unable or unlikely to remain compliant
  • allergic to yeast-derived products or bovine collagen or other bovine-sourced products
  • received an investigational therapy within 30 days of proposed surgery or during the follow-up phase of the study
  • is a prisoner, known or suspected transient or a history of drug/alcohol abuse within the 12 months prior to screening
  • pregnant or intending to become pregnant within 12 months of the study procedure
  • morbidly obese defined as BMI > 45 kg/m2
  • currently has an acute infection at the surgical site

Sites / Locations

  • Tucson Orthopaedic Research Center
  • University of Arizona
  • California Pacific Medical Center
  • Illinois Bone & Joint Institute, Ltd.
  • Loyola University Medical Center
  • Union Memorial Hospital
  • Mid Michigan Orthopaedic Institute
  • Orthopaedic Associates of Michigan, PC
  • Desert Orthopaedic Center
  • University of Medicine & Dentistry of New Jersey
  • Hospital for Special Surgery
  • University of Rochester Medical Center
  • OrthoCarolina, PA
  • Cleveland Clinic Orthopaedic
  • Orthopedic Foot & Ankle Center
  • Health Research Institute, Inc.
  • The Rothman Institute
  • Campbell Clinic / InMotion Orthopaedic Research Center
  • Texas Health Research & Education Institute
  • St. Luke's Episcopal Hospital
  • Life Mark Health Centre
  • St. Paul's Hospital
  • Queen Elizabeth II Health Services
  • The Ottawa Hospital
  • St. Michael's Hospital

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Augment® Injectable Bone Graft

Autologous bone graft

Arm Description

Standard rigid fixation + Augment® Injectable Bone Graft (beta-TCP/bovine collagen matrix + rhPDGF-BB)

Standard Rigid Fixation + Autologous bone graft

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Pain on Weight Bearing
Subjects were asked to stand and report pain on a 100 mm Visual Analog Scale (with 0 being no pain and 100 being worst pain imaginable).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Foot Function Index (FFI)
The Foot Function Index (FFI) measures the impact of foot pathology on function in terms of pain, disability and activity restriction. The FFI is a self-administered index consisting of 23 items divided into 3 sub-scales all ranging from 0-100. To obtain a sub-scale score, the item scores for a sub-scale are totaled and then divided by the maximum total possible for all of the sub-scale items which the subject indicated were applicable. Any item marked as not applicable is excluded from the total possible. Sub-scales are an average of the completed ratings within that sub-scale. The total foot function score is an average of the three sub-scale scores and ranges from 0-100. Lower scores are indicative of better outcomes whereas higher scores indicate greater impairment.
AOFAS Hindfoot and Ankle Score
Subjects were asked to report pain, functionality and ability levels while the physician performed assessments based on alignment, abnormality, motion, and stability. The total score ranges from a low of zero to a high of 100, with subscales measuring pain (40 points), function (50 points), and alignment (10 points), with higher scores showing better outcomes.
Fusion Site Pain
Subjects were asked to report current pain level at the fusion site on a 100 mm Visual Analog Scale (with 0 being no pain and 100 being worst pain imaginable).
SF-12 Physical Component Score
The SF-12 Physical Component Score is a validated quality of life metric with a minimum of zero and a maximum of 100, with higher scores denoting higher quality of life.

Full Information

First Posted
February 25, 2011
Last Updated
December 4, 2018
Sponsor
BioMimetic Therapeutics
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01305356
Brief Title
Augment® Injectable Bone Graft Compared to Autologous Bone Graft as a Bone Regeneration Device in Hindfoot Fusions
Official Title
A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Multi-Center, Pivotal Human Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of Augment® Injectable Bone Graft Compared to Autologous Bone Graft as a Bone Regeneration Device in Hindfoot Fusions
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
December 2018
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
March 2011 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
April 2013 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
April 2014 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
BioMimetic Therapeutics

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
STUDY OBJECTIVES: To demonstrate equivalent clinical and radiologic outcomes as "gold standard" (Autologous Bone Graft) in a representative clinical model (hindfoot fusions) STUDY HYPOTHESIS: Augment® Injectable is an equivalent bone grafting substitute to autologous bone graft in applications as shown by superiority analysis for safety and non-inferiority analysis for effectiveness STUDY RATIONALE: To evaluate a fully synthetic bone graft material to facilitate fusion in conditions or injuries requiring bone graft in a representative clinical fusion model and thus the opportunity to provide equivalent union rates as Autologous Bone Graft without necessitating an additional invasive procedure to harvest the graft
Detailed Description
STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, controlled, non-inferiority, multi-center trial NUMBER OF STUDY CENTERS: 25 NUMBER OF SUBJECTS: 299 Subjects (see "Study Population"). The subject population included subjects enrolled in 3 separate Clinical Trials. (BMTI-2006-01, BMTI-2009-01, and BMTI-2010-01) STUDY POPULATION: Male and female subjects 18 years of age or older requiring a hindfoot fusion procedure involving a bone grafting procedure. TREATMENT GROUPS: Group I: Standard Rigid Fixation + Autologous Bone Graft Group II: Standard Rigid Fixation + Augment® Injectable Bone Graft Subjects will be randomized in a 2:1 ratio (Augment® Injectable:Autologous Bone Graft). ROUTE OF ADMINISTRATION: Investigational device is manually implanted inside and around the fusion space to ensure Augment® Injectable Bone Graft (beta-TCP/bovine collagen matrix +rhPDGF-BB) or autologous bone graft is contained within the joint space STUDY DURATION: Twenty-four month follow-up post-surgery

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Degenerative Joint Disease, Congenital Deformity, Arthritis, Osteoarthritis, Rheumatoid Arthritis
Keywords
degenerative joint disease, DJD, joint fusion, hindfoot, congenital deformity, osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, post-traumatic arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, Augment(tm) Injectable Bone Graft, autologous bone graft, autogenous bone graft, beta-TCP, bovine collagen, rhPDGF(bb)

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Outcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
299 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Augment® Injectable Bone Graft
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Standard rigid fixation + Augment® Injectable Bone Graft (beta-TCP/bovine collagen matrix + rhPDGF-BB)
Arm Title
Autologous bone graft
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Standard Rigid Fixation + Autologous bone graft
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Augment® Injectable Bone Graft
Intervention Description
Implantation of up to 9cc of Augment® Injectable Bone Graft
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Autologous bone graft
Intervention Description
Implantation of up to 9cc of autologous bone graft
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Pain on Weight Bearing
Description
Subjects were asked to stand and report pain on a 100 mm Visual Analog Scale (with 0 being no pain and 100 being worst pain imaginable).
Time Frame
Baseline, 9, 12, 16, 24, 36, and 52 weeks
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Foot Function Index (FFI)
Description
The Foot Function Index (FFI) measures the impact of foot pathology on function in terms of pain, disability and activity restriction. The FFI is a self-administered index consisting of 23 items divided into 3 sub-scales all ranging from 0-100. To obtain a sub-scale score, the item scores for a sub-scale are totaled and then divided by the maximum total possible for all of the sub-scale items which the subject indicated were applicable. Any item marked as not applicable is excluded from the total possible. Sub-scales are an average of the completed ratings within that sub-scale. The total foot function score is an average of the three sub-scale scores and ranges from 0-100. Lower scores are indicative of better outcomes whereas higher scores indicate greater impairment.
Time Frame
Baseline, 9, 12, 16, 24, 36, and 52 weeks
Title
AOFAS Hindfoot and Ankle Score
Description
Subjects were asked to report pain, functionality and ability levels while the physician performed assessments based on alignment, abnormality, motion, and stability. The total score ranges from a low of zero to a high of 100, with subscales measuring pain (40 points), function (50 points), and alignment (10 points), with higher scores showing better outcomes.
Time Frame
Baseline, 9, 12, 16, 24, 36, and 52 weeks
Title
Fusion Site Pain
Description
Subjects were asked to report current pain level at the fusion site on a 100 mm Visual Analog Scale (with 0 being no pain and 100 being worst pain imaginable).
Time Frame
Baseline, 9, 12, 16, 24, 36, and 52 weeks
Title
SF-12 Physical Component Score
Description
The SF-12 Physical Component Score is a validated quality of life metric with a minimum of zero and a maximum of 100, with higher scores denoting higher quality of life.
Time Frame
Baseline, 9, 12, 16, 24, 36, and 52 weeks

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
KEY INCLUSION CRITERIA: at least 18 years old and considered skeletally mature diagnosed with degenerative joint disease (DJD) affecting the hindfoot due to a congenital or acquired deformity, osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, post- traumatic arthritis or ankylosing spondylitis of the ankle, subtalar, calcaneocuboid, and/or talonavicular joints requires one of the following hindfoot fusion proceduress with supplemental bone graft/substitute: ankle fusion (tibiotalar), subtalar fusion (talocalcaneal), calcaneocuboid fusion, talonavicular fusion, triple arthrodesis (subtalar, talonavicular and calcaneocuboid joints) OR double fusions (any combination of any two of the following: subtalar, talonavicular and calcaneocuboid joints) fusion site able to be rigidly stabilized with no more than 3 screws across the fusion site supplemental pins or staples allowed supplemental screws external to the fusion site(s) allowed signed informed consent document, independent, ambulatory, and can comply with all post-operative evaluations and visits KEY EXCLUSION CRITERIA: undergone previous fusion surgery at the proposed location, i.e., revision of a failed fusion more than one previous procedure at the involved joints retained hardware spanning the joint(s) intended for fusion procedure anticipated to require plate fixation (including claw plates), IM nails or more than 3 screws to achieve rigid fixation based on pre-op planning procedure expected to require more than 9cc of graft material based on pre-op planning procedure expected to require structural bone graft, allograft, bone graft substitute, platelet rich plasma (PRP) or bone marrow aspirate procedure expected to require a pantalar fusion, i.e., fusion of ankle plus all hindfoot joints (talonavicular, subtalar, and calcaneocuboid) or an ankle fusion in combination with any hindfoot fusion radiographic evidence of bone cysts, segmental defects or growth plate fracture near the fusion site that could negatively impact the proposed fusion procedure tested positive or been treated for a malignancy in the past or is suspected of having a malignancy or currently undergoing radio- or chemotherapy treatment for a malignancy anywhere in the body, whether adjacent to or distant from the proposed surgical site pre-existing sensory impairment, e.g., diabetics with baseline sensory impairment, which limits ability to perform objective functional measurements and may be at risk for complications - diabetics not sensitive to the 5.07 monofilament (Semmes-Weinstein) are to be excluded metabolic disorder known to adversely affect the skeleton other than primary osteoporosis or diabetes, e.g., renal osteodystrophy or hypercalcemia use of chronic medications known to affect the skeleton, e.g., glucocorticoid usage > 10mg/day pre-fracture neuromuscular or musculoskeletal deficiency which limits the ability to perform objective functional measurements physically or mentally compromised, e.g., current treatment for a psychiatric disorder, senile dementia, Alzheimer's disease, etc., to the extent that the Investigator judges the subject to be unable or unlikely to remain compliant allergic to yeast-derived products or bovine collagen or other bovine-sourced products received an investigational therapy within 30 days of proposed surgery or during the follow-up phase of the study is a prisoner, known or suspected transient or a history of drug/alcohol abuse within the 12 months prior to screening pregnant or intending to become pregnant within 12 months of the study procedure morbidly obese defined as BMI > 45 kg/m2 currently has an acute infection at the surgical site
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Stephen Roach
Organizational Affiliation
Stryker Trauma GmbH
Official's Role
Study Director
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Christopher DiGiovanni, MD
Organizational Affiliation
University Orthopaedics, Inc.
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Tucson Orthopaedic Research Center
City
Tucson
State/Province
Arizona
ZIP/Postal Code
85712
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Arizona
City
Tucson
State/Province
Arizona
ZIP/Postal Code
85724
Country
United States
Facility Name
California Pacific Medical Center
City
San Francisco
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
94118
Country
United States
Facility Name
Illinois Bone & Joint Institute, Ltd.
City
Glenview
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60025
Country
United States
Facility Name
Loyola University Medical Center
City
Maywood
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60153
Country
United States
Facility Name
Union Memorial Hospital
City
Baltimore
State/Province
Maryland
ZIP/Postal Code
21218
Country
United States
Facility Name
Mid Michigan Orthopaedic Institute
City
East Lansing
State/Province
Michigan
ZIP/Postal Code
48823
Country
United States
Facility Name
Orthopaedic Associates of Michigan, PC
City
Grand Rapids
State/Province
Michigan
ZIP/Postal Code
49525
Country
United States
Facility Name
Desert Orthopaedic Center
City
Las Vegas
State/Province
Nevada
ZIP/Postal Code
89121
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Medicine & Dentistry of New Jersey
City
Newark
State/Province
New Jersey
ZIP/Postal Code
07101
Country
United States
Facility Name
Hospital for Special Surgery
City
New York
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
10021
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Rochester Medical Center
City
Rochester
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
14642
Country
United States
Facility Name
OrthoCarolina, PA
City
Charlotte
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
28207
Country
United States
Facility Name
Cleveland Clinic Orthopaedic
City
Cleveland
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
44195
Country
United States
Facility Name
Orthopedic Foot & Ankle Center
City
Columbus
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
43231
Country
United States
Facility Name
Health Research Institute, Inc.
City
Oklahoma City
State/Province
Oklahoma
ZIP/Postal Code
73109
Country
United States
Facility Name
The Rothman Institute
City
Philadelphia
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
19107
Country
United States
Facility Name
Campbell Clinic / InMotion Orthopaedic Research Center
City
Memphis
State/Province
Tennessee
ZIP/Postal Code
38138
Country
United States
Facility Name
Texas Health Research & Education Institute
City
Dallas
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
75231
Country
United States
Facility Name
St. Luke's Episcopal Hospital
City
Houston
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
77030
Country
United States
Facility Name
Life Mark Health Centre
City
Calgary
State/Province
Alberta
Country
Canada
Facility Name
St. Paul's Hospital
City
Vancouver
State/Province
British Columbia
ZIP/Postal Code
V6Z1Y6
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Queen Elizabeth II Health Services
City
Halifax
State/Province
Nova Scotia
ZIP/Postal Code
B3H3A7
Country
Canada
Facility Name
The Ottawa Hospital
City
Ottawa
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
K1H8L6
Country
Canada
Facility Name
St. Michael's Hospital
City
Toronto
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
M5C1R6
Country
Canada

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
25848134
Citation
Daniels TR, Younger AS, Penner MJ, Wing KJ, Le IL, Russell IS, Lalonde KA, Evangelista PT, Quiton JD, Glazebrook M, DiGiovanni CW. Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial of Hindfoot and Ankle Fusions Treated With rhPDGF-BB in Combination With a beta-TCP-Collagen Matrix. Foot Ankle Int. 2015 Jul;36(7):739-48. doi: 10.1177/1071100715576370. Epub 2015 Apr 6.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
23824386
Citation
DiGiovanni CW, Lin SS, Baumhauer JF, Daniels T, Younger A, Glazebrook M, Anderson J, Anderson R, Evangelista P, Lynch SE; North American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Study Group. Recombinant human platelet-derived growth factor-BB and beta-tricalcium phosphate (rhPDGF-BB/beta-TCP): an alternative to autogenous bone graft. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013 Jul 3;95(13):1184-92. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.K.01422.
Results Reference
result

Learn more about this trial

Augment® Injectable Bone Graft Compared to Autologous Bone Graft as a Bone Regeneration Device in Hindfoot Fusions

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs