search
Back to results

Efficacy and Safety Study of Apremilast to Treat Active Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) (PALACE4)

Primary Purpose

Psoriatic Arthritis

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Apremilast 20mg
Apremilast 30mg
Placebo
Sponsored by
Amgen
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Psoriatic Arthritis focused on measuring psoriasis, Arthritis, Psoriatic Arthritis, inflammation, skin condition, inflammatory cells, apremilast, CC-10004, phosphodiesterase type 4

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

Subjects must satisfy the following criteria to be enrolled in the study:

  1. Male or female, aged ≥ 18 years at time of consent.
  2. Must understand and voluntarily sign an informed consent document prior to any study related assessments/procedures being conducted.
  3. Able to adhere to the study visit schedule and other protocol requirements.
  4. Have a documented diagnosis of Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA, by any criteria) of ≥ 3 months duration.
  5. Meet the Classification Criteria for Psoriatic Arthritis (CASPAR) criteria for PsA at time of screening.
  6. Have ≥ 3 swollen AND ≥ 3 tender joints.
  7. Have not been previously treated with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDS) (small molecules or biologics)
  8. Be receiving treatment on an outpatient basis.
  9. If taking oral corticosteroids, must be on a stable dose of prednisone ≤ 10 mg/day or equivalent for at least 1 month prior to screening.
  10. If taking nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) or narcotic analgesics, must be on stable dose for at least 2 weeks prior to screening and until they have completed the Week 24 study visit.
  11. Low potency topical corticosteroids (Appendix M or locally available equivalent) will be allowed as background therapy for treatment of psoriasis on the face, axillae and groin in accordance with the manufacturers' suggested usage during the course of the study. Subjects with scalp psoriasis will be permitted to use coal tar shampoo and/or salicylic acid scalp preparations on scalp lesions. A non-medicated skin emollient (eg, Eucerin cream) will also be permitted for body lesions only. Subjects must not use these treatments within 24 hours prior to the clinic visit.
  12. Meet the following laboratory criteria:

    • White blood cell count ≥ 3000/mm3 (≥ 3.0 x 109/L) and < 14,000/mm3 (< 14 x 109/L)
    • Platelet count ≥ 100,000/mm3 (≥ 100 x 109/L)
    • Serum creatinine ≤ 1.5 mg/dL(≤ 132.6 μmol/L)
    • Aspartate aminotransferase/Serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase (AST/SGOT) and Alanine aminotransferase/Serum glutamic pyruvic transaminase (ALT/SGPT) ≤ 2 x upper limit of normal (ULN)
    • Total bilirubin ≤ 2 mg/dL (≤ 34 μmol/L)
    • Hemoglobin ≥ 9 g/dL (≥ 5.6 mmol/L)
    • Hemoglobin A1c ≤ 9.0%
  13. Male subjects (including those who have had a vasectomy) who engage in activity in which conception is possible must use barrier contraception (latex condom or any nonlatex condom NOT made out of natural [animal] membrane [eg, polyurethane]) while on IP and for at least 28 days after the last dose of IP.
  14. Females of childbearing potential (FCBP) must have a negative pregnancy test at Screening and Baseline. FCBP who engage in activity in which conception is possible must use 2 forms of contraception while on investigational product (IP) and for at least 28 days after the last dose of IP: one highly effective form (ie, hormonal, intrauterine device [IUD], tubal ligation, vasectomized partner) and one additional form (latex condom or any nonlatex condom NOT made out of natural [animal] membrane [eg, polyurethane], diaphragm, sponge). If one highly effective form of contraception cannot be used, then 2 forms of barrier contraception must be used, ie, latex condom or any nonlatex condom NOT made out of natural (animal) membrane (eg, polyurethane) with either of the following: sponge with spermicide or diaphragm with spermicide.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. History of clinically significant (as determined by the Investigator) cardiac, endocrinologic, pulmonary, neurologic, psychiatric, hepatic, renal, hematologic, immunologic disease, or other major uncontrolled disease.
  2. Any condition, including the presence of laboratory abnormalities that places the subject at unacceptable risk if he/she were to participate in the study or confounds the ability to interpret data from the study.
  3. Clinically significant abnormality on 12-lead electrocardiography (ECG) at Screening.
  4. Pregnant or breast feeding.
  5. History of allergy to any component of the IP.
  6. Hepatitis B surface antigen positive at screening.
  7. Hepatitis C antibody positive at screening.
  8. AST/SGOT and/or ALT/SGPT > 1.5 x ULN and total bilirubin > ULN or albumin < lower limit of normal (LLN).
  9. History of positive Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV), or congenital or acquired immunodeficiency (eg, Common Variable Immunodeficiency Disease).
  10. Active tuberculosis or a history of incompletely treated tuberculosis.
  11. Clinically significant abnormality based upon chest radiograph with at least PA view (radiograph must be taken within 12 weeks prior to Screening or during the Screening visit). An additional lateral view is strongly recommended but not required.
  12. Active substance abuse or a history of substance abuse within 6 months prior to Screening.
  13. Bacterial infections requiring treatment with oral or injectable antibiotics, or significant viral or fungal infections, within 4 weeks of Screening. Any treatment for such infections must have been completed at least 4 weeks prior to Screening.
  14. Malignancy or history of malignancy (except for treated [ie, cured] basal cell or squamous cell in situ skin carcinomas and treated [ie, cured] cervical intraepithelial neoplasia [CIN] or carcinoma in situ of the cervix).
  15. Major surgery (including joint surgery) within 8 weeks prior to screening or planned major surgery within 6 months following randomization.
  16. Erythrodermic, guttate, or pustular psoriasis.
  17. Topical therapy for psoriasis, except as noted in the Inclusion Criteria, within 2 weeks of randomization (including but not limited to topical corticosteroids, topical retinoids or vitamin D analog preparations, tacrolimus, pimecrolimus, or anthralin).
  18. Rheumatic autoimmune disease other than PsA, including systemic lupus erythematosis (SLE), mixed connective tissue disease (MCTD), scleroderma, or polymyositis.
  19. Functional Class IV as defined by the ACR Classification of Functional Status in Rheumatoid Arthritis (Appendix Q).
  20. Prior history of or current inflammatory joint disease other than PsA (eg, gout, reactive arthritis, RA, ankylosing spondylitis, Lyme disease).
  21. Prior use of disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDS; small molecules or biologics).
  22. Use of the following systemic therapy(ies) within 4 weeks of randomization, including but not limited to corticosteroids (except as noted in inclusion criteria), oral retinoids and fumaric acid esters.
  23. Use of phototherapy within 4 weeks of randomization (ie, UVB, PUVA).
  24. Previous treatment with any cell depleting therapies, including investigational agents (eg, rituximab, CAMPATH, anti-CD4, anti-CD5, anti-CD3, anti-CD19, and anti-CD20).
  25. Treatment with intravenous gamma globulin, plasmapheresis, or Prosorba® column within 6 months of baseline.
  26. Any previous treatment with alkylating agents such as cyclophosphamide or chlorambucil, or with total lymphoid irradiation.
  27. Prior treatment with apremilast.
  28. Use of any investigational drug within 4 weeks of randomization, or 5 pharmacokinetic/ pharmacodynamic half lives, if known (whichever is longer).

Sites / Locations

  • Arizona Research Center
  • Desert Medical Advances
  • In Vivo Clinical Research
  • Centre For Rheumatology, Immun. And Arthritis
  • North Florida Dermatology
  • Florida Center for Dermatology, PA
  • Tampa Medical Group Pa
  • Atlanta Dermatology, Vein and Research Center, PC
  • Arthritis and Rheumatology of Georgia
  • Sonora Clinical Research, LLC
  • Rockford Orthopedic Associates, LLC
  • The Arthritis Center
  • Indiana. University
  • Klein and Associates MD, PA
  • Klein and Associates MD, PA
  • Clinical Pharmacology Study Group
  • Justus Fiechtner MD PC
  • Heartland Clinical Research, Inc.
  • Physicians East
  • Unifour Medical Research Associatets LLC
  • Altoona Center for Clinical Research
  • Clinical Research Center of Reading, LLP
  • West Tennessee Research Institute
  • Austin Regional Clinic
  • Center for Clinical Studies
  • Houston Medical Research
  • Luckster Enterprises
  • Center for Clinical Studies
  • Rheumatology and Immunotherapy Center
  • PharmaSeek
  • Monash Medical Centre
  • Eastern Health Clinical School
  • Repatriation General Hospital
  • Menzies Centre for Population Health Research
  • Optimus Clinical Research Pty. Ltd
  • The Queen Elizabeth Hospital
  • UZ Leuven
  • CHU de Liege
  • Multiprofile Hospital for Active Treatment Trimontsium
  • 17 Diagnostic and Consulting Centre Sofia EOOD
  • Multiprofile Hospital for Active Treatment Sv. Ivan Rilski
  • Diagnostic-Consultative Center Sveta Anna
  • Diagnostic Consulting Center N4
  • Arthritis Research Centre of Canada
  • PerCuro Clinical Research
  • Manitoba Clinic
  • St. Clare's Health Care Corporation of St. John's
  • Ultranova Skincare
  • William Bensen's Private Practice
  • Rheumatology Research Associates
  • Wilderman Medical Clinic
  • Probity Medical Research Inc
  • Darryl Toth's Private Practice
  • Centre de Rhumatologie St-Louis
  • Saskatoon Osteoporosis Centre
  • Affidea Praha s.r.o
  • Revmatologicky ustav
  • Revmatologicka Ambulance
  • PV - MEDICAL, s.r.o.
  • East Tallinn Central Hospital
  • North Estonia Regional Hospital
  • Clinical Research Centre Ltd
  • Hotel Dieu
  • Groupe Hospitalier Archet I et II
  • Hopital Lariboisiere
  • Fondation Hôpital Saint-Joseph
  • Qualiclinic kft
  • Synexus Magyarország Kft.
  • Honvéd Kórház - Állami Egészségügyi Központ
  • Debreceni Egyetem Orvos- es Egeszsegtudomanyi Centrum
  • Pest Megyei Flor Ferenc Korhaz
  • Principal SMO Kft.
  • MAV Korhaz es Rendelointezet Szolnok
  • Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria San Martino
  • Ospedale Luigi Sacco
  • AOU della II Universita degli Studi di Napoli
  • Fondazione PTV Policlinico Tor Vergata
  • Ospedale Civile Maggiore Borgo Trento
  • Chungnam National University Hospital
  • Inha University Hosiptal
  • Gachon University Gil Medical Center
  • Siauliai Hospital
  • Waikato hospital
  • North Shore Hospital
  • Timaru Hospital
  • Bytomskie Centrum Medyczne Silesiana Sp. z o.o.
  • Szpital Uniwersytecki nr 2 im. Dr Jana Biziela w Bydgoszczy
  • Centrum Medyczne Silesiana Sp. z o.o.
  • Synexus SCM Sp. z o.o.
  • Synexus SCM Sp. z o.o.
  • Niepubliczny Zaklad Opieki Zdrowotnej REUMED
  • Prywatna Praktyka Lekarska
  • REUMATIKA-Centrum Reumatologii Niepubliczny Zaklad Opieki Zdrowotnej
  • Synexus SCM Sp. z o.o. Oddz. Warszawa
  • Synexus SCM Sp. z o.o.
  • Sf. Maria Clinical Hospital
  • Emergency County Clinical Hospital
  • Sf Apostol Andrei Emergency Clinical County Hospital
  • C.M.I. Dr. Ciornohuz Adriana
  • Veterans of Wars Regional Clinical Hospital
  • Kemerovo State Medical Academy of Roszdrav
  • Research Medical Complex Vashe Zdorovie
  • Krasnoyarsk State Medical Academy
  • City Clinical Hospital #5
  • Research Institute of Clinical Immunology
  • Research Institute of Clinical and Experimental Lymphology
  • Penza Regional Clinical Hospital n.a. N.N. Burdenko
  • Departmental Hospital at Smolensk Station RZhD JSC
  • Tomsk Regional Clinical Hospital
  • Regional Clinical Hospital
  • Voronezh Regional Clinical Hopsital #1, Voronezh State Medical Academy
  • Taipei Veterans General Hospital
  • National Taiwan University Hospital
  • Barnsley Hospital
  • Haywood Hospital
  • Cannock Chase Hospital
  • Poole Hospital
  • Southampton General Hospital

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm 4

Arm Type

Experimental

Experimental

Placebo Comparator

Placebo Comparator

Arm Label

Apremilast 20mg

Apremilast 30mg

Placebo + 20mg Apremilast

Placebo + 30mg Apremilast

Arm Description

Apremilast 20mg twice daily, orally

Apremilast 30mg twice daily, orally

Placebo + 20mg Apremilast tablets administered twice daily

Placebo + 30mg Apremilast tablets administered twice daily

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Week 16
A participant was a responder if the following 3 criteria for improvement from Baseline were met: • ≥ 20% improvement in 78 tender joint count; • ≥ 20% improvement in 76 swollen joint count; and • ≥ 20% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: -Patient's assessment of pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale [VAS]); -Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); -Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); -Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI)); -C-Reactive Protein.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire- Disability Index [HAQ-DI]) at Week 16
The Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index is a patient-reported questionnaire consisting of 20 questions referring to eight domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and usual activities. Participants assessed their ability to do each task over the past week using the following response categories: without any difficulty (0); with some difficulty (1); with much difficulty (2); and unable to do (3). Scores on each task are summed and averaged to provide an overall score ranging from 0 to 3, where zero represents no disability and three very severe, high-dependency disability. Negative changes from baseline in the overall score indicate improvement in functional ability.
Percentage of Participants With an ACR 20 Response at Week 24
Percentage of participants with an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) response. A participant was a responder if the following 3 criteria for improvement from baseline were met: • ≥ 20% improvement in 78 tender joint count; • ≥ 20% improvement in 76 swollen joint count; and • ≥ 20% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: Patient's assessment of pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale [VAS]); Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI)); C-Reactive Protein.
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire- Disability Index [HAQ-DI]) at Week 24
The Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index is a patient-reported questionnaire consisting of 20 questions referring to eight domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and usual activities. Participants assessed their ability to do each task over the past week using the following response categories: without any difficulty (0); with some difficulty (1); with much difficulty (2); and unable to do (3). Scores on each task are summed and averaged to provide an overall score ranging from 0 to 3, where zero represents no disability and three very severe, high-dependency disability. Negative changes from Baseline in the overall score indicate improvement in functional ability.
Change From Baseline in 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) Physical Functioning Domain at Week 16
The Medical Outcome Study Short Form 36-Item Health Survey, Version 2 (SF-36) is a self-administered instrument that measures the impact of disease on overall quality of life and consists of 36 questions in eight domains (physical function, pain, general and mental health, vitality, social function, physical and emotional health). SF-36 domain scores were first calculated to range from 0 to100 and then transformed to norm-based scores (the norm-based scores in the US general population have an average of 50 and a standard deviation of 10). Norm-based scores were used in analyses, with higher scores indicating a higher level of functioning. The physical functioning domain assesses limitations in physical activities because of health problems. A positive change from baseline score indicates an improvement.
Percentage of Participants With a Modified Psoriatic Arthritis Response Criteria (PsARC) Response at Week 16
Modified PsARC response is defined as improvement in at least 2 of the 4 measures, at least one of which must be tender joint count or swollen joint count, and no worsening in any of the 4 measures: • 78 tender joint count, • 76 swollen joint count, • Patient global assessment of disease activity, measured on a 100 mm visual Analog scale (VAS), where 0=lowest disease activity and 100=highest; • Physician global assessment of disease activity, measured on a 100 mm VAS, where 0=lowest disease activity and 100=highest. Improvement or worsening in joint counts is defined as decrease or increase, respectively, from baseline by ≥ 30%, and improvement or worsening in global assessments is defined as decrease or increase, respectively, from baseline by ≥ 20 mm VAS.
Change From Baseline in Patient's Assessment of Pain at Week 16
The participant was asked to place a vertical line on a 100-mm visual analog scale on which the left-hand boundary (score = 0 mm) represents "no pain," and the right-hand boundary (score = 100 mm) represents "pain as severe as can be imagined." The distance from the mark to the left-hand boundary was recorded in millimeters.
Change From Baseline in Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Entheses Score (MASES) at Week 16
The Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score quantitates inflammation of the entheses (enthesitis) by assessing pain at the following entheses (sites where tendons or ligaments insert into the bone): 1st costochondral joints left/right; 7th costochondral joints left/right; posterior superior iliac spine left/right; anterior superior iliac spine left/right; iliac crest left/right; 5th lumbar spinous process; and the proximal insertion of the Achilles tendon left/right. The MASES, ranging from 0 to 13, is the number of painful entheses out of 13 entheses.
Change From Baseline in Dactylitis Severity Score at Week 16
Dactylitis is characterized by swelling of the entire finger or toe. Each digit on the hands and feet will be rated as zero for no dactylitis or 1 for dactylitis present. The dactylitis severity score is the sum of the individual scores for each digit. The dactylitis severity score, ranging from 0 to 20, is the number of digits on the hands and feet with dactylitis present.
Change From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) at Week 16
The Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) is a composite index that is calculated as the sum of the: • 28 tender joint count (TJC), • 28 swollen joint count (SJC), • Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity measured on a 10 cm visual analog scale (VAS), where 0 cm = lowest disease activity and 10 cm = highest; • Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity -measured on a 10 cm VAS, where 0 cm = lowest disease activity and 10 cm = highest. The CDAI score ranges from 0-76 where lower scores indicate less disease activity. The following thresholds of disease activity have been defined for the CDAI: Remission: ≤ 2.8 Low Disease Activity: > 2.8 and ≤ 10 Moderate Disease Activity: > 10 and ≤ 22 High Disease Activity: > 22
Change From Baseline in the Disease Activity Score (DAS28) After 16 Weeks of Treatment
The DAS28 measures the severity of disease at a specific time and is derived from the following variables: • 28 tender joint count • 28 swollen joint count, which do not include the DIP joints, the hip joint, or the joints below the knee; • C-reactive protein (CRP) • Patient's global assessment of disease activity. DAS28(CRP) scores range from 0 to approximately 10, with the upper bound dependent on the highest possible level of CRP. A DAS28 score higher than 5.1 indicates high disease activity, a DAS28 score less than 3.2 indicates low disease activity, and a DAS28 score less than 2.6 indicates clinical remission.
Change From Baseline in the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue) Score at Week 16
The FACIT-Fatigue scale is a 13-item self-administered questionnaire that assesses both the physical and functional consequences of fatigue. Each question is answered on a 5-point scale, where 0 means "not at all," and 4 means "very much." The FACIT-Fatigue scale score ranges from 0 to 52, with higher scores denoting lower levels of fatigue. A positive change from baseline score indicates an improvement.
Change From Baseline in 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) Physical Functioning Domain at Week 24
The Medical Outcome Study Short Form 36-Item Health Survey, Version 2 (SF-36) is a self-administered instrument that measures the impact of disease on overall quality of life and consists of 36 questions in eight domains (physical function, pain, general and mental health, vitality, social function, physical and emotional health). SF-36 domain scores were first calculated to range from 0 to100 and then transformed to norm-based scores (the norm-based scores in the US general population have an average of 50 and a standard deviation of 10). Norm-based scores were used in analyses, with higher scores indicating a higher level of functioning. The physical functioning domain assesses limitations in physical activities because of health problems. A positive change from baseline score indicates an improvement.
Percentage of Participants With a Modified Psoriatic Arthritis Response Criteria (PsARC) Response at Week 24
Modified PsARC response is defined as improvement in at least 2 of the 4 measures, at least one of which must be tender joint count or swollen joint count, and no worsening in any of the 4 measures: • 78 tender joint count, • 76 swollen joint count, • Patient global assessment of disease activity, measured on a 100 mm visual Analog scale (VAS), where 0=lowest disease activity and 100=highest; • Physician global assessment of disease activity, measured on a 100 mm VAS, where 0=lowest disease activity and 100=highest. Improvement or worsening in joint counts is defined as decrease or increase, respectively, from baseline by ≥ 30%, and improvement or worsening in global assessments is defined as decrease or increase, respectively, from baseline by ≥ 20 mm VAS.
Change From Baseline in Participants Assessment of Pain at Week 24
The participant was asked to place a vertical line on a 100-mm visual analog scale on which the left-hand boundary (score = 0 mm) represents "no pain," and the right-hand boundary (score = 100 mm) represents "pain as severe as can be imagined." The distance from the mark to the left-hand boundary was recorded in millimeters.
Change From Baseline in Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Entheses Score (MASES) at Week 24
The Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score quantitates inflammation of the entheses (enthesitis) by assessing pain at the following entheses (sites where tendons or ligaments insert into the bone): 1st costochondral joints left/right; 7th costochondral joints left/right; posterior superior iliac spine left/right; anterior superior iliac spine left/right; iliac crest left/right; 5th lumbar spinous process; and the proximal insertion of the Achilles tendon left/right. The MASES, ranging from 0 to 13, is the number of painful entheses out of 13 entheses.
Change From Baseline in Dactylitis Severity Score at Week 24
Dactylitis is characterized by swelling of the entire finger or toe. Each digit on the hands and feet will be rated as zero for no dactylitis or 1 for dactylitis present. The dactylitis severity score is the sum of the individual scores for each digit. The dactylitis severity score, ranging from 0 to 20, is the number of digits on the hands and feet with dactylitis present.
Change From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) at Week 24
The Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) is a composite index that is calculated as the sum of the: • 28 tender joint count (TJC), • 28 swollen joint count (SJC), • Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity measured on a 10 cm visual analog scale (VAS), where 0 cm = lowest disease activity and 10 cm = highest; • Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity -measured on a 10 cm VAS, where 0 cm = lowest disease activity and 10 cm = highest. The CDAI score ranges from 0-76 where lower scores indicate less disease activity. The following thresholds of disease activity have been defined for the CDAI: Remission: ≤ 2.8; Low Disease Activity: > 2.8 and ≤ 10; Moderate Disease Activity: > 10 and ≤ 22; High Disease Activity: > 22.
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score (DAS 28) at Week 24
The DAS28 measures the severity of disease at a specific time and is derived from the following variables: • 28 tender joint count • 28 swollen joint count, which do not include the DIP joints, the hip joint, or the joints below the knee; • C-reactive protein (CRP) • Patient's global assessment of disease activity. DAS28(CRP) scores range from 0 to approximately 10, with the upper bound dependent on the highest possible level of CRP. A DAS28 score higher than 5.1 indicates high disease activity, a DAS28 score less than 3.2 indicates low disease activity, and a DAS28 score less than 2.6 indicates clinical remission.
Change From Baseline in the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue) Score at Week 24
The FACIT-Fatigue scale is a 13-item self-administered questionnaire that assesses both the physical and functional consequences of fatigue. Each question is answered on a 5-point scale, where 0 means "not at all," and 4 means "very much." The FACIT-Fatigue scale score ranges from 0 to 52, with higher scores denoting lower levels of fatigue. A positive change from baseline score indicates an improvement.
Percentage of Participants With ≥ 20% Improvement in Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Entheses Score at Week 16
Percentage of participants with pre-existing enthesopathy whose MASES improved by ≥ 20% from Baseline after 16 weeks of treatment. The Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score quantitates inflammation of the entheses (enthesitis) by assessing pain at the following entheses (sites where tendons or ligaments insert into the bone): 1st costochondral joints left/right; 7th costochondral joints left/right; posterior superior iliac spine left/right; anterior superior iliac spine left/right; iliac crest left/right; 5th lumbar spinous process; and the proximal insertion of the Achilles tendon left/right. The MASES, ranging from 0 to 13, is the number of painful entheses out of 13 entheses.
Percentage of Participants With Dactylitis Improvement ≥ 1 Point at Week 16
Percentage of participants with pre-existing dactylitis whose dactylitis severity score improved by ≥ 1 after 16 weeks of treatment. Dactylitis is characterized by swelling of the entire finger or toe. Each digit on the hands and feet was rated as zero for no dactylitis or 1 for dactylitis present. The dactylitis severity score is the sum of the individual scores for each digit. The dactylitis severity score, ranging from 0 to 20, is the number of digits on the hands and feet with dactylitis present.
Percentage of Participants With Good or Moderate European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response at Week 16
The EULAR response criteria classify each subject as a good, moderate or non-responder to treatment based on the degree of improvement from baseline and the level of disease activity at the endpoint. EULAR response is derived using the individual subject's DAS28 as the measure of severity of disease. Good or moderate response is defined as follows: Good response: DAS28 at the time point ≤ 3.2 and improvement from baseline > 1.2 Moderate response: DAS28 at the time point > 3.2 and improvement from baseline > 1.2, or DAS28 at the time point ≤ 5.1 and improvement from baseline > 0.6 and ≤ 1.2
Percentage of Participants With MASES Improvement ≥ 20% at Week 24
Percentage of participants with pre-existing enthesopathy whose MASES improved by ≥ 20% from Baseline after 24 weeks of treatment. The Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score quantitates inflammation of the entheses (enthesitis) by assessing pain at the following entheses (sites where tendons or ligaments insert into the bone): 1st costochondral joints left/right; 7th costochondral joints left/right; posterior superior iliac spine left/right; anterior superior iliac spine left/right; iliac crest left/right; 5th lumbar spinous process; and the proximal insertion of the Achilles tendon left/right. The MASES, ranging from 0 to 13, is the number of painful entheses out of 13 entheses.
Percentage of Participants With Dactylitis Improvement ≥ 1 Point at Week 24
Percentage of participants with pre-existing dactylitis whose dactylitis severity score improved by ≥ 1 after 24 weeks of treatment. Dactylitis is characterized by swelling of the entire finger or toe. Each digit on the hands and feet was rated as zero for no dactylitis or 1 for dactylitis present. The dactylitis severity score is the sum of the individual scores for each digit. The dactylitis severity score, ranging from 0 to 20, is the number of digits on the hands and feet with dactylitis present.
Percentage of Participants With Good or Moderate EULAR Response at Week 24
The EULAR response reflects an improvement in disease activity and an attainment of a lower degree of disease activity based on th DAS-28. Good or moderate response is defined as follows: Good response: DAS28 at the time point ≤ 3.2 and improvement from baseline > 1.2 Moderate response: DAS28 at the time point > 3.2 and improvement from baseline > 1.2, or DAS28 at the time point ≤ 5.1 and improvement from baseline > 0.6 and ≤ 1.2 A Moderate Response is defined as either: • an improvement (decrease) in the DAS28 of greater than 0.6 and less than or equal to 1.2 and attainment of a DAS28 score of less than or equal to 5.1 or, • an improvement (decrease) in the DAS28 of more than 1.2 and attainment of a DAS28 score of greater than 3.2.
Percentage of Participants With a ACR 50 Response at Week 16
Percentage of participants with an American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) response. A participant was a responder if the following 3 criteria for improvement from Baseline were met: • ≥ 50% improvement in 78 tender joint count; • ≥ 50% improvement in 76 swollen joint count; and • ≥ 50% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: Patient's assessment of pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale [VAS]); Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI)); C-Reactive Protein.
Percentage of Participants With a ACR 70 Response at Week 16
Percentage of participants with an American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) response. A participant was a responder if the following 3 criteria for improvement from Baseline were met: • ≥ 70% improvement in 78 tender joint count; • ≥ 70% improvement in 76 swollen joint count; and • ≥ 70% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: Patient's assessment of pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale [VAS]); Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI)); C-Reactive Protein.
Percentage of Participants With a ACR 50 Response at Week 24
Percentage of participants with an American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) response. A participant was a responder if the following 3 criteria for improvement from Baseline were met: • ≥ 50% improvement in 78 tender joint count; • ≥ 50% improvement in 76 swollen joint count; and • ≥ 50% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: Patient's assessment of pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale [VAS]); Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI)); C-Reactive Protein.
Percentage of Participants With a ACR 70 Response at Week 24
Percentage of participants with an American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) response. A participant was a responder if the following 3 criteria for improvement from Baseline were met: • ≥ 70% improvement in 78 tender joint count; • ≥ 70% improvement in 76 swollen joint count; and • ≥ 70% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: Patient's assessment of pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale [VAS]); Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI)); C-Reactive Protein.
Percentage of Participants With Pre-existing Enthesopathy Whose Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Entheses Score Improves to 0 at Week 16
Percentage of participants with pre-existing enthesopathy whose MASES improves to 0 after 16 weeks of treatment. The Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score quantitates inflammation of the entheses (enthesitis) by assessing pain at the following entheses (sites where tendons or ligaments insert into the bone): 1st costochondral joints left/right; 7th costochondral joints left/right; posterior superior iliac spine left/right; anterior superior iliac spine left/right; iliac crest left/right; 5th lumbar spinous process; and the proximal insertion of the Achilles tendon left/right. The MASES, ranging from 0 to 13, is the number of painful entheses out of 13 entheses.
Percentage of Participants With Pre-existing Dactylitis Whose Dactylitis Severity Score Improves to 0 at Week 16
Percentage of participants with pre-existing dactylitis whose dactylitis severity score improves to zero after 16 weeks of treatment. Dactylitis is characterized by swelling of the entire finger or toe. Each digit on the hands and feet was rated as zero for no dactylitis or 1 for dactylitis present. The dactylitis severity score is the sum of the individual scores for each digit. The dactylitis severity score, ranging from 0 to 20, is the number of digits on the hands and feet with dactylitis present.
Percentage of Participants Achieving a MASES Score of Zero at Week 24
Percentage of participants with pre-existing enthesopathy whose MASES improves to 0 after 24 weeks of treatment. The Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score quantitates inflammation of the entheses (enthesitis) by assessing pain at the following entheses (sites where tendons or ligaments insert into the bone): 1st costochondral joints left/right; 7th costochondral joints left/right; posterior superior iliac spine left/right; anterior superior iliac spine left/right; iliac crest left/right; 5th lumbar spinous process; and the proximal insertion of the Achilles tendon left/right. The MASES, ranging from 0 to 13, is the number of painful entheses out of 13 entheses.
Percentage of Participants Achieving a Dactylitis Score of Zero at Week 24
Percentage of participants with pre-existing dactylitis whose dactylitis severity score improves to zero after 24 weeks of treatment. Dactylitis is characterized by swelling of the entire finger or toe. Each digit on the hands and feet was rated as zero for no dactylitis or 1 for dactylitis present. The dactylitis severity score is the sum of the individual scores for each digit. The dactylitis severity score, ranging from 0 to 20, is the number of digits on the hands and feet with dactylitis present.
Percentage of Participants With a ACR 20 Response at Week 52
Percentage of participants with an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) response. A participant was a responder if the following 3 criteria for improvement from Baseline were met: ≥ 20% improvement in 78 tender joint count; ≥ 20% improvement in 76 swollen joint count; and ≥ 20% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: Patient's assessment of pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale [VAS]); Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI)); C-Reactive Protein. Two-sided 95% confidence interval is based on the Clopper-Pearson method.
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 52
The Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index is a patient-reported questionnaire consisting of 20 questions referring to eight domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and usual activities. Participants assessed their ability to do each task over the past week using the following response categories: without any difficulty (0); with some difficulty (1); with much difficulty (2); and unable to do (3). Scores on each task are summed and averaged to provide an overall score ranging from 0 to 3, where zero represents no disability and three very severe, high-dependency disability. Negative changes from Baseline in the overall score indicate improvement in functional ability.
Change From Baseline in the SF-36v2 Physical Functioning Scale Score at Week 52
The Medical Outcome Study Short Form 36-Item Health Survey, Version 2 (SF-36) is a self-administered instrument that measures the impact of disease on overall quality of life and consists of 36 questions in eight domains (physical function, pain, general and mental health, vitality, social function, physical and emotional health). Norm-based scores were used in analyses, calibrated so that 50 is the average score and the standard deviation equals 10. Higher scores indicate a higher level of functioning. The physical functioning domain assesses limitations in physical activities because of health problems. A positive change from Baseline score indicates an improvement.
Percentage of Participants With a Modified PsARC Response at Week 52
Measure Description: Modified PsARC response is defined as improvement in at least 2 of the 4 measures, at least one of which must be tender joint count or swollen joint count, and no worsening in any of the 4 measures: • 78 tender joint count, • 76 swollen joint count, • Patient global assessment of disease activity, measured on a 100 mm visual Analog scale (VAS), where 0=lowest disease activity and 100=highest; • Physician global assessment of disease activity, measured on a 100 mm VAS, where 0=lowest disease activity and 100=highest. Improvement or worsening in joint counts is defined as decrease or increase, respectively, from baseline by ≥ 30%, and improvement or worsening in global assessments is defined as decrease or increase, respectively, from baseline by ≥ 20 mm VAS. Two-sided 95% confidence interval is based on the Clopper-Pearson method.
Change From Baseline in the Participants Assessment of Pain Using the Visual Analog Scale at Week 52
The participant was asked to place a vertical line on a 100-mm visual analog scale on which the left-hand boundary (score = 0 mm) represents "no pain," and the right-hand boundary (score = 100 mm) represents "pain as severe as can be imagined." The distance from the mark to the left-hand boundary was recorded in millimeters.
Change From Baseline in Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Entheses Score (MASES) at Week 52
The Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score quantitates inflammation of the entheses (enthesitis) by assessing pain at the following entheses (sites where tendons or ligaments insert into the bone): 1st costochondral joints left/right; 7th costochondral joints left/right; posterior superior iliac spine left/right; anterior superior iliac spine left/right; iliac crest left/right; 5th lumbar spinous process; and the proximal insertion of the Achilles tendon left/right. The MASES, ranging from 0 to 13, is the number of painful entheses out of 13 entheses.
Change From Baseline in the Dactylitis Severity Score at Week 52
Dactylitis is characterized by swelling of the entire finger or toe. Each digit on the hands and feet will be rated as zero for no dactylitis or 1 for dactylitis present. The dactylitis severity score is the sum of the individual scores for each digit. The dactylitis severity score, ranging from 0 to 20, is the number of digits on the hands and feet with dactylitis present
Change From Baseline in the CDAI Score at Week 52
The Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) is a composite index that is calculated as the sum of the: 28 tender joint count (TJC), 28 swollen joint count (SJC), Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity measured on a 10 cm visual analog scale (VAS), where 0 cm = lowest disease activity and 10 cm = highest; Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity -measured on a 10 cm VAS, where 0 cm = lowest disease activity and 10 cm = highest. The CDAI score ranges from 0-76 where lower scores indicate less disease activity. The following thresholds of disease activity have been defined for the CDAI: Remission: ≤ 2.8 Low Disease Activity: > 2.8 and ≤ 10 Moderate Disease Activity: > 10 and ≤ 22 High Disease Activity: > 22.
Change From Baseline in the DAS28 at Week 52
The DAS28 measures the severity of disease at a specific time and is derived from the following variables: • 28 tender joint count • 28 swollen joint count, which do not include the DIP joints, the hip joint, or the joints below the knee; • C-reactive protein (CRP) • Patient's global assessment of disease activity. DAS28(CRP) scores range from 0 to approximately 10, with the upper bound dependent on the highest possible level of CRP. A DAS28 score higher than 5.1 indicates high disease activity, a DAS28 score less than 3.2 indicates low disease activity, and a DAS28 score less than 2.6 indicates clinical remission.
Change From Baseline in the FACIT-Fatigue Scale Score at Week 52
The FACIT-Fatigue scale is a 13-item self-administered questionnaire that assesses both the physical and functional consequences of fatigue. Each question is answered on a 5-point scale, where 0 means "not at all," and 4 means "very much." The FACIT-Fatigue scale score ranges from 0 to 52, with higher scores denoting lower levels of fatigue. A positive change from baseline score indicates an improvement.
Percentage of Participants With MASES Improvement ≥ 20% at Week 52
Percentage of participants with pre-existing enthesopathy whose MASES improved by ≥ 20% from Baseline after 52 weeks. The Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score quantitates inflammation of the entheses (enthesitis) by assessing pain at the following entheses (sites where tendons or ligaments insert into the bone): 1st costochondral joints left/right; 7th costochondral joints left/right; posterior superior iliac spine left/right; anterior superior iliac spine left/right; iliac crest left/right; 5th lumbar spinous process; and the proximal insertion of the Achilles tendon left/right. The MASES, ranging from 0 to 13, is the number of painful entheses out of 13 entheses. Two-sided 95% confidence interval is based on the Clopper-Pearson method.
Percentage of Participants With Pre-existing Dactylitis Whose Dactylitis Severity Score Improves From Baseline by ≥ 1 at Week 52
Percentage of participants with pre-existing dactylitis whose dactylitis severity score improved by ≥ 1 after 52 weeks. Dactylitis is characterized by swelling of the entire finger or toe. Each digit on the hands and feet was rated as zero for no dactylitis or 1 for dactylitis present. The dactylitis severity score is the sum of the individual scores for each digit. The dactylitis severity score, ranging from 0 to 20, is the number of digits on the hands and feet with dactylitis present. Two-sided 95% confidence interval is based on the Clopper-Pearson method.
Percentage of Participants Achieving Good or Moderate EULAR Response at Week 52
The EULAR response criteria classify each subject as a good, moderate or non-responder to treatment based on the degree of improvement from baseline and the level of disease activity at the endpoint. EULAR response is derived using the individual subject's DAS28 as the measure of severity of disease. A Good response is defined as follows: Good response: DAS28 at the time point ≤ 3.2 and improvement from baseline > 1.2 A Moderate Response is defined as either: an improvement (decrease) in the DAS28 of greater than 0.6 and less than or equal to 1.2 and attainment of a DAS28 score of less than or equal to 5.1 or, an improvement (decrease) in the DAS28 of more than 1.2 and attainment of a DAS28 score of greater than 3.2. Two-sided 95% confidence interval is based on the Clopper-Pearson method
Percentage of Participants With an ACR 50 Response at Week 52
Percentage of participants with an American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) response. A participant was a responder if the following 3 criteria for improvement from Baseline were met: ≥ 50% improvement in 78 tender joint count; ≥ 50% improvement in 76 swollen joint count; and ≥ 50% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: o Patient's assessment of pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale [VAS]); Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI)); C-Reactive Protein. Two-sided 95% confidence interval is based on the Clopper-Pearson method.
Percentage of Participants With an ACR 70 Response at Week 52
A participant was a responder if the following 3 criteria for improvement from Baseline were met: ≥ 70% improvement in 78 tender joint count; ≥ 70% improvement in 76 swollen joint count; and ≥ 70% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: Patient's assessment of pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale [VAS]); Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI)); C-Reactive Protein. Two-sided 95% confidence interval is based on the Clopper-Pearson method.
Percentage of Participants With Pre-existing Enthesopathy Whose MASES Improves From Baseline to 0 at Week 52
Percentage of participants with pre-existing enthesopathy whose MASES improves to 0 after 24 weeks. The Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score quantitates inflammation of the entheses (enthesitis) by assessing pain at the following entheses (sites where tendons or ligaments insert into the bone): 1st costochondral joints left/right; 7th costochondral joints left/right; posterior superior iliac spine left/right; anterior superior iliac spine left/right; iliac crest left/right; 5th lumbar spinous process; and the proximal insertion of the Achilles tendon left/right. The MASES, ranging from 0 to 13, is the number of painful entheses out of 13 entheses. Two-sided 95% confidence interval was based on the Clopper-Pearson method.
Percentage of Participants With Pre-existing Dactylitis Whose Dactylitis Severity Score Improves From Baseline to 0 at Week 52
Percentage of participants with pre-existing dactylitis whose dactylitis severity score improves to zero after 52 weeks. Dactylitis is characterized by swelling of the entire finger or toe. Each digit on the hands and feet was rated as zero for no dactylitis or 1 for dactylitis present. The dactylitis severity score is the sum of the individual scores for each digit and ranges from 0 to 20. Two-sided 95% confidence interval is based on the Clopper-Pearson method.
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events During the Placebo Controlled Phase
A TEAE is an adverse event (AE) with a start date on or after the date of the first dose of investigational product (IP) and no later than 28 days after the last dose of IP. An AE is any noxious, unintended, or untoward medical occurrence that may appear or worsen in a subject during the course of a study. A serious AE is any AE that results in death; is life-threatening; requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; is a congenital anomaly/birth defect; or constitutes an important medical event. For both AEs and SAEs the investigator assessed the severity of the event according to the grading scale: Mild: asymptomatic or with mild symptoms, Moderate: symptoms causing moderate discomfort or Severe: symptoms causing severe discomfort or pain.
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events During the Apremilast Exposure Period
A TEAE is an adverse event (AE) with a start date on or after the date of the first dose of investigational product (IP) and no later than 28 days after the last dose of IP. An AE is any noxious, unintended, or untoward medical occurrence that may appear or worsen in a subject during the course of a study. A serious AE is any AE that results in death; is life-threatening; requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; is a congenital anomaly/birth defect; or constitutes an important medical event. For both AEs and SAEs the investigator assessed the severity of the event according to the grading scale: Mild: asymptomatic or with mild symptoms, Moderate: symptoms causing moderate discomfort or Severe: symptoms causing severe discomfort or pain.

Full Information

First Posted
November 29, 2010
Last Updated
May 26, 2022
Sponsor
Amgen
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01307423
Brief Title
Efficacy and Safety Study of Apremilast to Treat Active Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA)
Acronym
PALACE4
Official Title
A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group, Efficacy and Safety Study of Two Doses of Apremilast (CC-10004) in Subjects With Active Psoriatic Arthritis Who Have Not Been Previously Treated With Disease-modifying Antirheumatic Drugs
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
April 2020
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
December 9, 2010 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
February 21, 2013 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
August 16, 2017 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Amgen

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine whether apremilast is safe and effective in the treatment of patients with psoriatic arthritis who have not been previously treated with DMARDs. Apremilast is proposed to improve signs and symptoms of psoriatic arthritis (tender and swollen joints, pain, physical function) in treated patients.
Detailed Description
Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is an inflammatory arthritis that occurs in 6-39% of psoriasis patients. The immunopathogenesis of PsA, which mirrors but is not identical to that seen in psoriatic plaques, reflects a complex interaction among resident dendritic, fibroblastic and endothelial cells, and inflammatory cells attracted to the synovium by cytokines and chemokines. Apremilast (CC-10004) is a novel oral agent that modulates multiple inflammatory pathways through targeted phosphodiesterase type 4 (PDE4) enzyme inhibition. Therefore, apremilast has the potential to be effective in the treatment of PsA.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Psoriatic Arthritis
Keywords
psoriasis, Arthritis, Psoriatic Arthritis, inflammation, skin condition, inflammatory cells, apremilast, CC-10004, phosphodiesterase type 4

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
529 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Apremilast 20mg
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Apremilast 20mg twice daily, orally
Arm Title
Apremilast 30mg
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Apremilast 30mg twice daily, orally
Arm Title
Placebo + 20mg Apremilast
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
Placebo + 20mg Apremilast tablets administered twice daily
Arm Title
Placebo + 30mg Apremilast
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
Placebo + 30mg Apremilast tablets administered twice daily
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Apremilast 20mg
Other Intervention Name(s)
CC-10004
Intervention Description
Apremilast 20mg twice daily, orally
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Apremilast 30mg
Other Intervention Name(s)
CC-10004
Intervention Description
Apremilast 30mg twice daily, orally
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Placebo
Intervention Description
Placebo
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Week 16
Description
A participant was a responder if the following 3 criteria for improvement from Baseline were met: • ≥ 20% improvement in 78 tender joint count; • ≥ 20% improvement in 76 swollen joint count; and • ≥ 20% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: -Patient's assessment of pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale [VAS]); -Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); -Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); -Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI)); -C-Reactive Protein.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 16
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire- Disability Index [HAQ-DI]) at Week 16
Description
The Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index is a patient-reported questionnaire consisting of 20 questions referring to eight domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and usual activities. Participants assessed their ability to do each task over the past week using the following response categories: without any difficulty (0); with some difficulty (1); with much difficulty (2); and unable to do (3). Scores on each task are summed and averaged to provide an overall score ranging from 0 to 3, where zero represents no disability and three very severe, high-dependency disability. Negative changes from baseline in the overall score indicate improvement in functional ability.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 16
Title
Percentage of Participants With an ACR 20 Response at Week 24
Description
Percentage of participants with an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) response. A participant was a responder if the following 3 criteria for improvement from baseline were met: • ≥ 20% improvement in 78 tender joint count; • ≥ 20% improvement in 76 swollen joint count; and • ≥ 20% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: Patient's assessment of pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale [VAS]); Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI)); C-Reactive Protein.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 24
Title
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire- Disability Index [HAQ-DI]) at Week 24
Description
The Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index is a patient-reported questionnaire consisting of 20 questions referring to eight domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and usual activities. Participants assessed their ability to do each task over the past week using the following response categories: without any difficulty (0); with some difficulty (1); with much difficulty (2); and unable to do (3). Scores on each task are summed and averaged to provide an overall score ranging from 0 to 3, where zero represents no disability and three very severe, high-dependency disability. Negative changes from Baseline in the overall score indicate improvement in functional ability.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 24
Title
Change From Baseline in 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) Physical Functioning Domain at Week 16
Description
The Medical Outcome Study Short Form 36-Item Health Survey, Version 2 (SF-36) is a self-administered instrument that measures the impact of disease on overall quality of life and consists of 36 questions in eight domains (physical function, pain, general and mental health, vitality, social function, physical and emotional health). SF-36 domain scores were first calculated to range from 0 to100 and then transformed to norm-based scores (the norm-based scores in the US general population have an average of 50 and a standard deviation of 10). Norm-based scores were used in analyses, with higher scores indicating a higher level of functioning. The physical functioning domain assesses limitations in physical activities because of health problems. A positive change from baseline score indicates an improvement.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 16
Title
Percentage of Participants With a Modified Psoriatic Arthritis Response Criteria (PsARC) Response at Week 16
Description
Modified PsARC response is defined as improvement in at least 2 of the 4 measures, at least one of which must be tender joint count or swollen joint count, and no worsening in any of the 4 measures: • 78 tender joint count, • 76 swollen joint count, • Patient global assessment of disease activity, measured on a 100 mm visual Analog scale (VAS), where 0=lowest disease activity and 100=highest; • Physician global assessment of disease activity, measured on a 100 mm VAS, where 0=lowest disease activity and 100=highest. Improvement or worsening in joint counts is defined as decrease or increase, respectively, from baseline by ≥ 30%, and improvement or worsening in global assessments is defined as decrease or increase, respectively, from baseline by ≥ 20 mm VAS.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 16
Title
Change From Baseline in Patient's Assessment of Pain at Week 16
Description
The participant was asked to place a vertical line on a 100-mm visual analog scale on which the left-hand boundary (score = 0 mm) represents "no pain," and the right-hand boundary (score = 100 mm) represents "pain as severe as can be imagined." The distance from the mark to the left-hand boundary was recorded in millimeters.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 16
Title
Change From Baseline in Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Entheses Score (MASES) at Week 16
Description
The Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score quantitates inflammation of the entheses (enthesitis) by assessing pain at the following entheses (sites where tendons or ligaments insert into the bone): 1st costochondral joints left/right; 7th costochondral joints left/right; posterior superior iliac spine left/right; anterior superior iliac spine left/right; iliac crest left/right; 5th lumbar spinous process; and the proximal insertion of the Achilles tendon left/right. The MASES, ranging from 0 to 13, is the number of painful entheses out of 13 entheses.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 16
Title
Change From Baseline in Dactylitis Severity Score at Week 16
Description
Dactylitis is characterized by swelling of the entire finger or toe. Each digit on the hands and feet will be rated as zero for no dactylitis or 1 for dactylitis present. The dactylitis severity score is the sum of the individual scores for each digit. The dactylitis severity score, ranging from 0 to 20, is the number of digits on the hands and feet with dactylitis present.
Time Frame
Baseline to Week 16
Title
Change From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) at Week 16
Description
The Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) is a composite index that is calculated as the sum of the: • 28 tender joint count (TJC), • 28 swollen joint count (SJC), • Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity measured on a 10 cm visual analog scale (VAS), where 0 cm = lowest disease activity and 10 cm = highest; • Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity -measured on a 10 cm VAS, where 0 cm = lowest disease activity and 10 cm = highest. The CDAI score ranges from 0-76 where lower scores indicate less disease activity. The following thresholds of disease activity have been defined for the CDAI: Remission: ≤ 2.8 Low Disease Activity: > 2.8 and ≤ 10 Moderate Disease Activity: > 10 and ≤ 22 High Disease Activity: > 22
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 16
Title
Change From Baseline in the Disease Activity Score (DAS28) After 16 Weeks of Treatment
Description
The DAS28 measures the severity of disease at a specific time and is derived from the following variables: • 28 tender joint count • 28 swollen joint count, which do not include the DIP joints, the hip joint, or the joints below the knee; • C-reactive protein (CRP) • Patient's global assessment of disease activity. DAS28(CRP) scores range from 0 to approximately 10, with the upper bound dependent on the highest possible level of CRP. A DAS28 score higher than 5.1 indicates high disease activity, a DAS28 score less than 3.2 indicates low disease activity, and a DAS28 score less than 2.6 indicates clinical remission.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 16
Title
Change From Baseline in the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue) Score at Week 16
Description
The FACIT-Fatigue scale is a 13-item self-administered questionnaire that assesses both the physical and functional consequences of fatigue. Each question is answered on a 5-point scale, where 0 means "not at all," and 4 means "very much." The FACIT-Fatigue scale score ranges from 0 to 52, with higher scores denoting lower levels of fatigue. A positive change from baseline score indicates an improvement.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 16
Title
Change From Baseline in 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) Physical Functioning Domain at Week 24
Description
The Medical Outcome Study Short Form 36-Item Health Survey, Version 2 (SF-36) is a self-administered instrument that measures the impact of disease on overall quality of life and consists of 36 questions in eight domains (physical function, pain, general and mental health, vitality, social function, physical and emotional health). SF-36 domain scores were first calculated to range from 0 to100 and then transformed to norm-based scores (the norm-based scores in the US general population have an average of 50 and a standard deviation of 10). Norm-based scores were used in analyses, with higher scores indicating a higher level of functioning. The physical functioning domain assesses limitations in physical activities because of health problems. A positive change from baseline score indicates an improvement.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 24
Title
Percentage of Participants With a Modified Psoriatic Arthritis Response Criteria (PsARC) Response at Week 24
Description
Modified PsARC response is defined as improvement in at least 2 of the 4 measures, at least one of which must be tender joint count or swollen joint count, and no worsening in any of the 4 measures: • 78 tender joint count, • 76 swollen joint count, • Patient global assessment of disease activity, measured on a 100 mm visual Analog scale (VAS), where 0=lowest disease activity and 100=highest; • Physician global assessment of disease activity, measured on a 100 mm VAS, where 0=lowest disease activity and 100=highest. Improvement or worsening in joint counts is defined as decrease or increase, respectively, from baseline by ≥ 30%, and improvement or worsening in global assessments is defined as decrease or increase, respectively, from baseline by ≥ 20 mm VAS.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 24
Title
Change From Baseline in Participants Assessment of Pain at Week 24
Description
The participant was asked to place a vertical line on a 100-mm visual analog scale on which the left-hand boundary (score = 0 mm) represents "no pain," and the right-hand boundary (score = 100 mm) represents "pain as severe as can be imagined." The distance from the mark to the left-hand boundary was recorded in millimeters.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 24
Title
Change From Baseline in Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Entheses Score (MASES) at Week 24
Description
The Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score quantitates inflammation of the entheses (enthesitis) by assessing pain at the following entheses (sites where tendons or ligaments insert into the bone): 1st costochondral joints left/right; 7th costochondral joints left/right; posterior superior iliac spine left/right; anterior superior iliac spine left/right; iliac crest left/right; 5th lumbar spinous process; and the proximal insertion of the Achilles tendon left/right. The MASES, ranging from 0 to 13, is the number of painful entheses out of 13 entheses.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 24
Title
Change From Baseline in Dactylitis Severity Score at Week 24
Description
Dactylitis is characterized by swelling of the entire finger or toe. Each digit on the hands and feet will be rated as zero for no dactylitis or 1 for dactylitis present. The dactylitis severity score is the sum of the individual scores for each digit. The dactylitis severity score, ranging from 0 to 20, is the number of digits on the hands and feet with dactylitis present.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 24
Title
Change From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) at Week 24
Description
The Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) is a composite index that is calculated as the sum of the: • 28 tender joint count (TJC), • 28 swollen joint count (SJC), • Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity measured on a 10 cm visual analog scale (VAS), where 0 cm = lowest disease activity and 10 cm = highest; • Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity -measured on a 10 cm VAS, where 0 cm = lowest disease activity and 10 cm = highest. The CDAI score ranges from 0-76 where lower scores indicate less disease activity. The following thresholds of disease activity have been defined for the CDAI: Remission: ≤ 2.8; Low Disease Activity: > 2.8 and ≤ 10; Moderate Disease Activity: > 10 and ≤ 22; High Disease Activity: > 22.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 24
Title
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score (DAS 28) at Week 24
Description
The DAS28 measures the severity of disease at a specific time and is derived from the following variables: • 28 tender joint count • 28 swollen joint count, which do not include the DIP joints, the hip joint, or the joints below the knee; • C-reactive protein (CRP) • Patient's global assessment of disease activity. DAS28(CRP) scores range from 0 to approximately 10, with the upper bound dependent on the highest possible level of CRP. A DAS28 score higher than 5.1 indicates high disease activity, a DAS28 score less than 3.2 indicates low disease activity, and a DAS28 score less than 2.6 indicates clinical remission.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 24
Title
Change From Baseline in the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue) Score at Week 24
Description
The FACIT-Fatigue scale is a 13-item self-administered questionnaire that assesses both the physical and functional consequences of fatigue. Each question is answered on a 5-point scale, where 0 means "not at all," and 4 means "very much." The FACIT-Fatigue scale score ranges from 0 to 52, with higher scores denoting lower levels of fatigue. A positive change from baseline score indicates an improvement.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 24
Title
Percentage of Participants With ≥ 20% Improvement in Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Entheses Score at Week 16
Description
Percentage of participants with pre-existing enthesopathy whose MASES improved by ≥ 20% from Baseline after 16 weeks of treatment. The Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score quantitates inflammation of the entheses (enthesitis) by assessing pain at the following entheses (sites where tendons or ligaments insert into the bone): 1st costochondral joints left/right; 7th costochondral joints left/right; posterior superior iliac spine left/right; anterior superior iliac spine left/right; iliac crest left/right; 5th lumbar spinous process; and the proximal insertion of the Achilles tendon left/right. The MASES, ranging from 0 to 13, is the number of painful entheses out of 13 entheses.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 16
Title
Percentage of Participants With Dactylitis Improvement ≥ 1 Point at Week 16
Description
Percentage of participants with pre-existing dactylitis whose dactylitis severity score improved by ≥ 1 after 16 weeks of treatment. Dactylitis is characterized by swelling of the entire finger or toe. Each digit on the hands and feet was rated as zero for no dactylitis or 1 for dactylitis present. The dactylitis severity score is the sum of the individual scores for each digit. The dactylitis severity score, ranging from 0 to 20, is the number of digits on the hands and feet with dactylitis present.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 16
Title
Percentage of Participants With Good or Moderate European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response at Week 16
Description
The EULAR response criteria classify each subject as a good, moderate or non-responder to treatment based on the degree of improvement from baseline and the level of disease activity at the endpoint. EULAR response is derived using the individual subject's DAS28 as the measure of severity of disease. Good or moderate response is defined as follows: Good response: DAS28 at the time point ≤ 3.2 and improvement from baseline > 1.2 Moderate response: DAS28 at the time point > 3.2 and improvement from baseline > 1.2, or DAS28 at the time point ≤ 5.1 and improvement from baseline > 0.6 and ≤ 1.2
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 16
Title
Percentage of Participants With MASES Improvement ≥ 20% at Week 24
Description
Percentage of participants with pre-existing enthesopathy whose MASES improved by ≥ 20% from Baseline after 24 weeks of treatment. The Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score quantitates inflammation of the entheses (enthesitis) by assessing pain at the following entheses (sites where tendons or ligaments insert into the bone): 1st costochondral joints left/right; 7th costochondral joints left/right; posterior superior iliac spine left/right; anterior superior iliac spine left/right; iliac crest left/right; 5th lumbar spinous process; and the proximal insertion of the Achilles tendon left/right. The MASES, ranging from 0 to 13, is the number of painful entheses out of 13 entheses.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 24
Title
Percentage of Participants With Dactylitis Improvement ≥ 1 Point at Week 24
Description
Percentage of participants with pre-existing dactylitis whose dactylitis severity score improved by ≥ 1 after 24 weeks of treatment. Dactylitis is characterized by swelling of the entire finger or toe. Each digit on the hands and feet was rated as zero for no dactylitis or 1 for dactylitis present. The dactylitis severity score is the sum of the individual scores for each digit. The dactylitis severity score, ranging from 0 to 20, is the number of digits on the hands and feet with dactylitis present.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 24
Title
Percentage of Participants With Good or Moderate EULAR Response at Week 24
Description
The EULAR response reflects an improvement in disease activity and an attainment of a lower degree of disease activity based on th DAS-28. Good or moderate response is defined as follows: Good response: DAS28 at the time point ≤ 3.2 and improvement from baseline > 1.2 Moderate response: DAS28 at the time point > 3.2 and improvement from baseline > 1.2, or DAS28 at the time point ≤ 5.1 and improvement from baseline > 0.6 and ≤ 1.2 A Moderate Response is defined as either: • an improvement (decrease) in the DAS28 of greater than 0.6 and less than or equal to 1.2 and attainment of a DAS28 score of less than or equal to 5.1 or, • an improvement (decrease) in the DAS28 of more than 1.2 and attainment of a DAS28 score of greater than 3.2.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 24
Title
Percentage of Participants With a ACR 50 Response at Week 16
Description
Percentage of participants with an American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) response. A participant was a responder if the following 3 criteria for improvement from Baseline were met: • ≥ 50% improvement in 78 tender joint count; • ≥ 50% improvement in 76 swollen joint count; and • ≥ 50% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: Patient's assessment of pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale [VAS]); Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI)); C-Reactive Protein.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 16
Title
Percentage of Participants With a ACR 70 Response at Week 16
Description
Percentage of participants with an American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) response. A participant was a responder if the following 3 criteria for improvement from Baseline were met: • ≥ 70% improvement in 78 tender joint count; • ≥ 70% improvement in 76 swollen joint count; and • ≥ 70% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: Patient's assessment of pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale [VAS]); Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI)); C-Reactive Protein.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 16
Title
Percentage of Participants With a ACR 50 Response at Week 24
Description
Percentage of participants with an American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) response. A participant was a responder if the following 3 criteria for improvement from Baseline were met: • ≥ 50% improvement in 78 tender joint count; • ≥ 50% improvement in 76 swollen joint count; and • ≥ 50% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: Patient's assessment of pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale [VAS]); Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI)); C-Reactive Protein.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 24
Title
Percentage of Participants With a ACR 70 Response at Week 24
Description
Percentage of participants with an American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) response. A participant was a responder if the following 3 criteria for improvement from Baseline were met: • ≥ 70% improvement in 78 tender joint count; • ≥ 70% improvement in 76 swollen joint count; and • ≥ 70% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: Patient's assessment of pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale [VAS]); Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI)); C-Reactive Protein.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 24
Title
Percentage of Participants With Pre-existing Enthesopathy Whose Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Entheses Score Improves to 0 at Week 16
Description
Percentage of participants with pre-existing enthesopathy whose MASES improves to 0 after 16 weeks of treatment. The Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score quantitates inflammation of the entheses (enthesitis) by assessing pain at the following entheses (sites where tendons or ligaments insert into the bone): 1st costochondral joints left/right; 7th costochondral joints left/right; posterior superior iliac spine left/right; anterior superior iliac spine left/right; iliac crest left/right; 5th lumbar spinous process; and the proximal insertion of the Achilles tendon left/right. The MASES, ranging from 0 to 13, is the number of painful entheses out of 13 entheses.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 16
Title
Percentage of Participants With Pre-existing Dactylitis Whose Dactylitis Severity Score Improves to 0 at Week 16
Description
Percentage of participants with pre-existing dactylitis whose dactylitis severity score improves to zero after 16 weeks of treatment. Dactylitis is characterized by swelling of the entire finger or toe. Each digit on the hands and feet was rated as zero for no dactylitis or 1 for dactylitis present. The dactylitis severity score is the sum of the individual scores for each digit. The dactylitis severity score, ranging from 0 to 20, is the number of digits on the hands and feet with dactylitis present.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 16
Title
Percentage of Participants Achieving a MASES Score of Zero at Week 24
Description
Percentage of participants with pre-existing enthesopathy whose MASES improves to 0 after 24 weeks of treatment. The Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score quantitates inflammation of the entheses (enthesitis) by assessing pain at the following entheses (sites where tendons or ligaments insert into the bone): 1st costochondral joints left/right; 7th costochondral joints left/right; posterior superior iliac spine left/right; anterior superior iliac spine left/right; iliac crest left/right; 5th lumbar spinous process; and the proximal insertion of the Achilles tendon left/right. The MASES, ranging from 0 to 13, is the number of painful entheses out of 13 entheses.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 24
Title
Percentage of Participants Achieving a Dactylitis Score of Zero at Week 24
Description
Percentage of participants with pre-existing dactylitis whose dactylitis severity score improves to zero after 24 weeks of treatment. Dactylitis is characterized by swelling of the entire finger or toe. Each digit on the hands and feet was rated as zero for no dactylitis or 1 for dactylitis present. The dactylitis severity score is the sum of the individual scores for each digit. The dactylitis severity score, ranging from 0 to 20, is the number of digits on the hands and feet with dactylitis present.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 24
Title
Percentage of Participants With a ACR 20 Response at Week 52
Description
Percentage of participants with an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) response. A participant was a responder if the following 3 criteria for improvement from Baseline were met: ≥ 20% improvement in 78 tender joint count; ≥ 20% improvement in 76 swollen joint count; and ≥ 20% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: Patient's assessment of pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale [VAS]); Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI)); C-Reactive Protein. Two-sided 95% confidence interval is based on the Clopper-Pearson method.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 52
Title
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 52
Description
The Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index is a patient-reported questionnaire consisting of 20 questions referring to eight domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and usual activities. Participants assessed their ability to do each task over the past week using the following response categories: without any difficulty (0); with some difficulty (1); with much difficulty (2); and unable to do (3). Scores on each task are summed and averaged to provide an overall score ranging from 0 to 3, where zero represents no disability and three very severe, high-dependency disability. Negative changes from Baseline in the overall score indicate improvement in functional ability.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 52
Title
Change From Baseline in the SF-36v2 Physical Functioning Scale Score at Week 52
Description
The Medical Outcome Study Short Form 36-Item Health Survey, Version 2 (SF-36) is a self-administered instrument that measures the impact of disease on overall quality of life and consists of 36 questions in eight domains (physical function, pain, general and mental health, vitality, social function, physical and emotional health). Norm-based scores were used in analyses, calibrated so that 50 is the average score and the standard deviation equals 10. Higher scores indicate a higher level of functioning. The physical functioning domain assesses limitations in physical activities because of health problems. A positive change from Baseline score indicates an improvement.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 52
Title
Percentage of Participants With a Modified PsARC Response at Week 52
Description
Measure Description: Modified PsARC response is defined as improvement in at least 2 of the 4 measures, at least one of which must be tender joint count or swollen joint count, and no worsening in any of the 4 measures: • 78 tender joint count, • 76 swollen joint count, • Patient global assessment of disease activity, measured on a 100 mm visual Analog scale (VAS), where 0=lowest disease activity and 100=highest; • Physician global assessment of disease activity, measured on a 100 mm VAS, where 0=lowest disease activity and 100=highest. Improvement or worsening in joint counts is defined as decrease or increase, respectively, from baseline by ≥ 30%, and improvement or worsening in global assessments is defined as decrease or increase, respectively, from baseline by ≥ 20 mm VAS. Two-sided 95% confidence interval is based on the Clopper-Pearson method.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 52
Title
Change From Baseline in the Participants Assessment of Pain Using the Visual Analog Scale at Week 52
Description
The participant was asked to place a vertical line on a 100-mm visual analog scale on which the left-hand boundary (score = 0 mm) represents "no pain," and the right-hand boundary (score = 100 mm) represents "pain as severe as can be imagined." The distance from the mark to the left-hand boundary was recorded in millimeters.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 52
Title
Change From Baseline in Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Entheses Score (MASES) at Week 52
Description
The Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score quantitates inflammation of the entheses (enthesitis) by assessing pain at the following entheses (sites where tendons or ligaments insert into the bone): 1st costochondral joints left/right; 7th costochondral joints left/right; posterior superior iliac spine left/right; anterior superior iliac spine left/right; iliac crest left/right; 5th lumbar spinous process; and the proximal insertion of the Achilles tendon left/right. The MASES, ranging from 0 to 13, is the number of painful entheses out of 13 entheses.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 52
Title
Change From Baseline in the Dactylitis Severity Score at Week 52
Description
Dactylitis is characterized by swelling of the entire finger or toe. Each digit on the hands and feet will be rated as zero for no dactylitis or 1 for dactylitis present. The dactylitis severity score is the sum of the individual scores for each digit. The dactylitis severity score, ranging from 0 to 20, is the number of digits on the hands and feet with dactylitis present
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 52
Title
Change From Baseline in the CDAI Score at Week 52
Description
The Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) is a composite index that is calculated as the sum of the: 28 tender joint count (TJC), 28 swollen joint count (SJC), Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity measured on a 10 cm visual analog scale (VAS), where 0 cm = lowest disease activity and 10 cm = highest; Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity -measured on a 10 cm VAS, where 0 cm = lowest disease activity and 10 cm = highest. The CDAI score ranges from 0-76 where lower scores indicate less disease activity. The following thresholds of disease activity have been defined for the CDAI: Remission: ≤ 2.8 Low Disease Activity: > 2.8 and ≤ 10 Moderate Disease Activity: > 10 and ≤ 22 High Disease Activity: > 22.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 52
Title
Change From Baseline in the DAS28 at Week 52
Description
The DAS28 measures the severity of disease at a specific time and is derived from the following variables: • 28 tender joint count • 28 swollen joint count, which do not include the DIP joints, the hip joint, or the joints below the knee; • C-reactive protein (CRP) • Patient's global assessment of disease activity. DAS28(CRP) scores range from 0 to approximately 10, with the upper bound dependent on the highest possible level of CRP. A DAS28 score higher than 5.1 indicates high disease activity, a DAS28 score less than 3.2 indicates low disease activity, and a DAS28 score less than 2.6 indicates clinical remission.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 52
Title
Change From Baseline in the FACIT-Fatigue Scale Score at Week 52
Description
The FACIT-Fatigue scale is a 13-item self-administered questionnaire that assesses both the physical and functional consequences of fatigue. Each question is answered on a 5-point scale, where 0 means "not at all," and 4 means "very much." The FACIT-Fatigue scale score ranges from 0 to 52, with higher scores denoting lower levels of fatigue. A positive change from baseline score indicates an improvement.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 52
Title
Percentage of Participants With MASES Improvement ≥ 20% at Week 52
Description
Percentage of participants with pre-existing enthesopathy whose MASES improved by ≥ 20% from Baseline after 52 weeks. The Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score quantitates inflammation of the entheses (enthesitis) by assessing pain at the following entheses (sites where tendons or ligaments insert into the bone): 1st costochondral joints left/right; 7th costochondral joints left/right; posterior superior iliac spine left/right; anterior superior iliac spine left/right; iliac crest left/right; 5th lumbar spinous process; and the proximal insertion of the Achilles tendon left/right. The MASES, ranging from 0 to 13, is the number of painful entheses out of 13 entheses. Two-sided 95% confidence interval is based on the Clopper-Pearson method.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 52
Title
Percentage of Participants With Pre-existing Dactylitis Whose Dactylitis Severity Score Improves From Baseline by ≥ 1 at Week 52
Description
Percentage of participants with pre-existing dactylitis whose dactylitis severity score improved by ≥ 1 after 52 weeks. Dactylitis is characterized by swelling of the entire finger or toe. Each digit on the hands and feet was rated as zero for no dactylitis or 1 for dactylitis present. The dactylitis severity score is the sum of the individual scores for each digit. The dactylitis severity score, ranging from 0 to 20, is the number of digits on the hands and feet with dactylitis present. Two-sided 95% confidence interval is based on the Clopper-Pearson method.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 52
Title
Percentage of Participants Achieving Good or Moderate EULAR Response at Week 52
Description
The EULAR response criteria classify each subject as a good, moderate or non-responder to treatment based on the degree of improvement from baseline and the level of disease activity at the endpoint. EULAR response is derived using the individual subject's DAS28 as the measure of severity of disease. A Good response is defined as follows: Good response: DAS28 at the time point ≤ 3.2 and improvement from baseline > 1.2 A Moderate Response is defined as either: an improvement (decrease) in the DAS28 of greater than 0.6 and less than or equal to 1.2 and attainment of a DAS28 score of less than or equal to 5.1 or, an improvement (decrease) in the DAS28 of more than 1.2 and attainment of a DAS28 score of greater than 3.2. Two-sided 95% confidence interval is based on the Clopper-Pearson method
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 52
Title
Percentage of Participants With an ACR 50 Response at Week 52
Description
Percentage of participants with an American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) response. A participant was a responder if the following 3 criteria for improvement from Baseline were met: ≥ 50% improvement in 78 tender joint count; ≥ 50% improvement in 76 swollen joint count; and ≥ 50% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: o Patient's assessment of pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale [VAS]); Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI)); C-Reactive Protein. Two-sided 95% confidence interval is based on the Clopper-Pearson method.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 52
Title
Percentage of Participants With an ACR 70 Response at Week 52
Description
A participant was a responder if the following 3 criteria for improvement from Baseline were met: ≥ 70% improvement in 78 tender joint count; ≥ 70% improvement in 76 swollen joint count; and ≥ 70% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: Patient's assessment of pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale [VAS]); Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI)); C-Reactive Protein. Two-sided 95% confidence interval is based on the Clopper-Pearson method.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 52
Title
Percentage of Participants With Pre-existing Enthesopathy Whose MASES Improves From Baseline to 0 at Week 52
Description
Percentage of participants with pre-existing enthesopathy whose MASES improves to 0 after 24 weeks. The Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score quantitates inflammation of the entheses (enthesitis) by assessing pain at the following entheses (sites where tendons or ligaments insert into the bone): 1st costochondral joints left/right; 7th costochondral joints left/right; posterior superior iliac spine left/right; anterior superior iliac spine left/right; iliac crest left/right; 5th lumbar spinous process; and the proximal insertion of the Achilles tendon left/right. The MASES, ranging from 0 to 13, is the number of painful entheses out of 13 entheses. Two-sided 95% confidence interval was based on the Clopper-Pearson method.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 52
Title
Percentage of Participants With Pre-existing Dactylitis Whose Dactylitis Severity Score Improves From Baseline to 0 at Week 52
Description
Percentage of participants with pre-existing dactylitis whose dactylitis severity score improves to zero after 52 weeks. Dactylitis is characterized by swelling of the entire finger or toe. Each digit on the hands and feet was rated as zero for no dactylitis or 1 for dactylitis present. The dactylitis severity score is the sum of the individual scores for each digit and ranges from 0 to 20. Two-sided 95% confidence interval is based on the Clopper-Pearson method.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 52
Title
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events During the Placebo Controlled Phase
Description
A TEAE is an adverse event (AE) with a start date on or after the date of the first dose of investigational product (IP) and no later than 28 days after the last dose of IP. An AE is any noxious, unintended, or untoward medical occurrence that may appear or worsen in a subject during the course of a study. A serious AE is any AE that results in death; is life-threatening; requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; is a congenital anomaly/birth defect; or constitutes an important medical event. For both AEs and SAEs the investigator assessed the severity of the event according to the grading scale: Mild: asymptomatic or with mild symptoms, Moderate: symptoms causing moderate discomfort or Severe: symptoms causing severe discomfort or pain.
Time Frame
Week 0 to Week 16 for placebo participants who entered EE at Week 16 and up to Week 24 for all other participants (placebo participants who remained on placebo through week 24 and participants randomized to the APR 20 mg BID or APR 30 mg BID)
Title
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events During the Apremilast Exposure Period
Description
A TEAE is an adverse event (AE) with a start date on or after the date of the first dose of investigational product (IP) and no later than 28 days after the last dose of IP. An AE is any noxious, unintended, or untoward medical occurrence that may appear or worsen in a subject during the course of a study. A serious AE is any AE that results in death; is life-threatening; requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; is a congenital anomaly/birth defect; or constitutes an important medical event. For both AEs and SAEs the investigator assessed the severity of the event according to the grading scale: Mild: asymptomatic or with mild symptoms, Moderate: symptoms causing moderate discomfort or Severe: symptoms causing severe discomfort or pain.
Time Frame
Week 0 to Week 260; median duration of exposure to apremilast 20 mg BID was 168.93 weeks and 229.36 weeks for apremilast 30 mg BID

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Subjects must satisfy the following criteria to be enrolled in the study: Male or female, aged ≥ 18 years at time of consent. Must understand and voluntarily sign an informed consent document prior to any study related assessments/procedures being conducted. Able to adhere to the study visit schedule and other protocol requirements. Have a documented diagnosis of Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA, by any criteria) of ≥ 3 months duration. Meet the Classification Criteria for Psoriatic Arthritis (CASPAR) criteria for PsA at time of screening. Have ≥ 3 swollen AND ≥ 3 tender joints. Have not been previously treated with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDS) (small molecules or biologics) Be receiving treatment on an outpatient basis. If taking oral corticosteroids, must be on a stable dose of prednisone ≤ 10 mg/day or equivalent for at least 1 month prior to screening. If taking nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) or narcotic analgesics, must be on stable dose for at least 2 weeks prior to screening and until they have completed the Week 24 study visit. Low potency topical corticosteroids (Appendix M or locally available equivalent) will be allowed as background therapy for treatment of psoriasis on the face, axillae and groin in accordance with the manufacturers' suggested usage during the course of the study. Subjects with scalp psoriasis will be permitted to use coal tar shampoo and/or salicylic acid scalp preparations on scalp lesions. A non-medicated skin emollient (eg, Eucerin cream) will also be permitted for body lesions only. Subjects must not use these treatments within 24 hours prior to the clinic visit. Meet the following laboratory criteria: White blood cell count ≥ 3000/mm3 (≥ 3.0 x 109/L) and < 14,000/mm3 (< 14 x 109/L) Platelet count ≥ 100,000/mm3 (≥ 100 x 109/L) Serum creatinine ≤ 1.5 mg/dL(≤ 132.6 μmol/L) Aspartate aminotransferase/Serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase (AST/SGOT) and Alanine aminotransferase/Serum glutamic pyruvic transaminase (ALT/SGPT) ≤ 2 x upper limit of normal (ULN) Total bilirubin ≤ 2 mg/dL (≤ 34 μmol/L) Hemoglobin ≥ 9 g/dL (≥ 5.6 mmol/L) Hemoglobin A1c ≤ 9.0% Male subjects (including those who have had a vasectomy) who engage in activity in which conception is possible must use barrier contraception (latex condom or any nonlatex condom NOT made out of natural [animal] membrane [eg, polyurethane]) while on IP and for at least 28 days after the last dose of IP. Females of childbearing potential (FCBP) must have a negative pregnancy test at Screening and Baseline. FCBP who engage in activity in which conception is possible must use 2 forms of contraception while on investigational product (IP) and for at least 28 days after the last dose of IP: one highly effective form (ie, hormonal, intrauterine device [IUD], tubal ligation, vasectomized partner) and one additional form (latex condom or any nonlatex condom NOT made out of natural [animal] membrane [eg, polyurethane], diaphragm, sponge). If one highly effective form of contraception cannot be used, then 2 forms of barrier contraception must be used, ie, latex condom or any nonlatex condom NOT made out of natural (animal) membrane (eg, polyurethane) with either of the following: sponge with spermicide or diaphragm with spermicide. Exclusion Criteria: History of clinically significant (as determined by the Investigator) cardiac, endocrinologic, pulmonary, neurologic, psychiatric, hepatic, renal, hematologic, immunologic disease, or other major uncontrolled disease. Any condition, including the presence of laboratory abnormalities that places the subject at unacceptable risk if he/she were to participate in the study or confounds the ability to interpret data from the study. Clinically significant abnormality on 12-lead electrocardiography (ECG) at Screening. Pregnant or breast feeding. History of allergy to any component of the IP. Hepatitis B surface antigen positive at screening. Hepatitis C antibody positive at screening. AST/SGOT and/or ALT/SGPT > 1.5 x ULN and total bilirubin > ULN or albumin < lower limit of normal (LLN). History of positive Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV), or congenital or acquired immunodeficiency (eg, Common Variable Immunodeficiency Disease). Active tuberculosis or a history of incompletely treated tuberculosis. Clinically significant abnormality based upon chest radiograph with at least PA view (radiograph must be taken within 12 weeks prior to Screening or during the Screening visit). An additional lateral view is strongly recommended but not required. Active substance abuse or a history of substance abuse within 6 months prior to Screening. Bacterial infections requiring treatment with oral or injectable antibiotics, or significant viral or fungal infections, within 4 weeks of Screening. Any treatment for such infections must have been completed at least 4 weeks prior to Screening. Malignancy or history of malignancy (except for treated [ie, cured] basal cell or squamous cell in situ skin carcinomas and treated [ie, cured] cervical intraepithelial neoplasia [CIN] or carcinoma in situ of the cervix). Major surgery (including joint surgery) within 8 weeks prior to screening or planned major surgery within 6 months following randomization. Erythrodermic, guttate, or pustular psoriasis. Topical therapy for psoriasis, except as noted in the Inclusion Criteria, within 2 weeks of randomization (including but not limited to topical corticosteroids, topical retinoids or vitamin D analog preparations, tacrolimus, pimecrolimus, or anthralin). Rheumatic autoimmune disease other than PsA, including systemic lupus erythematosis (SLE), mixed connective tissue disease (MCTD), scleroderma, or polymyositis. Functional Class IV as defined by the ACR Classification of Functional Status in Rheumatoid Arthritis (Appendix Q). Prior history of or current inflammatory joint disease other than PsA (eg, gout, reactive arthritis, RA, ankylosing spondylitis, Lyme disease). Prior use of disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDS; small molecules or biologics). Use of the following systemic therapy(ies) within 4 weeks of randomization, including but not limited to corticosteroids (except as noted in inclusion criteria), oral retinoids and fumaric acid esters. Use of phototherapy within 4 weeks of randomization (ie, UVB, PUVA). Previous treatment with any cell depleting therapies, including investigational agents (eg, rituximab, CAMPATH, anti-CD4, anti-CD5, anti-CD3, anti-CD19, and anti-CD20). Treatment with intravenous gamma globulin, plasmapheresis, or Prosorba® column within 6 months of baseline. Any previous treatment with alkylating agents such as cyclophosphamide or chlorambucil, or with total lymphoid irradiation. Prior treatment with apremilast. Use of any investigational drug within 4 weeks of randomization, or 5 pharmacokinetic/ pharmacodynamic half lives, if known (whichever is longer).
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
MD
Organizational Affiliation
Amgen
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Arizona Research Center
City
Phoenix
State/Province
Arizona
ZIP/Postal Code
85023
Country
United States
Facility Name
Desert Medical Advances
City
Palm Desert
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92260
Country
United States
Facility Name
In Vivo Clinical Research
City
Doral
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33166
Country
United States
Facility Name
Centre For Rheumatology, Immun. And Arthritis
City
Fort Lauderdale
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33334
Country
United States
Facility Name
North Florida Dermatology
City
Jacksonville
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
32204
Country
United States
Facility Name
Florida Center for Dermatology, PA
City
Saint Augustine
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
32086
Country
United States
Facility Name
Tampa Medical Group Pa
City
Tampa
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33614
Country
United States
Facility Name
Atlanta Dermatology, Vein and Research Center, PC
City
Alpharetta
State/Province
Georgia
ZIP/Postal Code
30022
Country
United States
Facility Name
Arthritis and Rheumatology of Georgia
City
Atlanta
State/Province
Georgia
ZIP/Postal Code
30342
Country
United States
Facility Name
Sonora Clinical Research, LLC
City
Boise
State/Province
Idaho
ZIP/Postal Code
83702
Country
United States
Facility Name
Rockford Orthopedic Associates, LLC
City
Rockford
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
61107
Country
United States
Facility Name
The Arthritis Center
City
Springfield
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
62704
Country
United States
Facility Name
Indiana. University
City
Indianapolis
State/Province
Indiana
ZIP/Postal Code
46202
Country
United States
Facility Name
Klein and Associates MD, PA
City
Cumberland
State/Province
Maryland
ZIP/Postal Code
21502
Country
United States
Facility Name
Klein and Associates MD, PA
City
Hagerstown
State/Province
Maryland
ZIP/Postal Code
21740
Country
United States
Facility Name
Clinical Pharmacology Study Group
City
Worcester
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
01605
Country
United States
Facility Name
Justus Fiechtner MD PC
City
Lansing
State/Province
Michigan
ZIP/Postal Code
48910
Country
United States
Facility Name
Heartland Clinical Research, Inc.
City
Omaha
State/Province
Nebraska
ZIP/Postal Code
68134
Country
United States
Facility Name
Physicians East
City
Greenville
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27834
Country
United States
Facility Name
Unifour Medical Research Associatets LLC
City
Hickory
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
28602
Country
United States
Facility Name
Altoona Center for Clinical Research
City
Duncansville
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
16635
Country
United States
Facility Name
Clinical Research Center of Reading, LLP
City
West Reading
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
19610
Country
United States
Facility Name
West Tennessee Research Institute
City
Jackson
State/Province
Tennessee
ZIP/Postal Code
38305
Country
United States
Facility Name
Austin Regional Clinic
City
Austin
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
78731
Country
United States
Facility Name
Center for Clinical Studies
City
Houston
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
77065
Country
United States
Facility Name
Houston Medical Research
City
Houston
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
77090
Country
United States
Facility Name
Luckster Enterprises
City
San Antonio
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
78232
Country
United States
Facility Name
Center for Clinical Studies
City
Webster
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
77598
Country
United States
Facility Name
Rheumatology and Immunotherapy Center
City
Franklin
State/Province
Wisconsin
ZIP/Postal Code
53132
Country
United States
Facility Name
PharmaSeek
City
Middleton
State/Province
Wisconsin
ZIP/Postal Code
53562
Country
United States
Facility Name
Monash Medical Centre
City
Clayton
State/Province
Victoria
ZIP/Postal Code
3168
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Eastern Health Clinical School
City
Box Hill
ZIP/Postal Code
3128
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Repatriation General Hospital
City
Daws Park
ZIP/Postal Code
5041
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Menzies Centre for Population Health Research
City
Hobart
ZIP/Postal Code
7000
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Optimus Clinical Research Pty. Ltd
City
Kogarah
ZIP/Postal Code
2217
Country
Australia
Facility Name
The Queen Elizabeth Hospital
City
Woodville
ZIP/Postal Code
5011
Country
Australia
Facility Name
UZ Leuven
City
Leuven
ZIP/Postal Code
3000
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
CHU de Liege
City
Liège
ZIP/Postal Code
4000
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
Multiprofile Hospital for Active Treatment Trimontsium
City
Plovdiv
ZIP/Postal Code
4000
Country
Bulgaria
Facility Name
17 Diagnostic and Consulting Centre Sofia EOOD
City
Sofia
ZIP/Postal Code
1505
Country
Bulgaria
Facility Name
Multiprofile Hospital for Active Treatment Sv. Ivan Rilski
City
Sofia
ZIP/Postal Code
1606
Country
Bulgaria
Facility Name
Diagnostic-Consultative Center Sveta Anna
City
Sofia
ZIP/Postal Code
1709
Country
Bulgaria
Facility Name
Diagnostic Consulting Center N4
City
Varna
ZIP/Postal Code
9010
Country
Bulgaria
Facility Name
Arthritis Research Centre of Canada
City
Vancouver
State/Province
British Columbia
ZIP/Postal Code
V5Z1L7
Country
Canada
Facility Name
PerCuro Clinical Research
City
Victoria
State/Province
British Columbia
ZIP/Postal Code
V8P5P6
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Manitoba Clinic
City
Winnipeg
State/Province
Manitoba
ZIP/Postal Code
R3A1M3
Country
Canada
Facility Name
St. Clare's Health Care Corporation of St. John's
City
St John's
State/Province
Newfoundland and Labrador
ZIP/Postal Code
A1C-5B8
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Ultranova Skincare
City
Barrie
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
L4M 6L2
Country
Canada
Facility Name
William Bensen's Private Practice
City
Hamilton
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
L8N1Y2
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Rheumatology Research Associates
City
Ottawa
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
K1H1A2
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Wilderman Medical Clinic
City
Thornhill
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
L4J1W3
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Probity Medical Research Inc
City
Waterloo
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
N2J1C4
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Darryl Toth's Private Practice
City
Windsor
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
N8W 1E6
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Centre de Rhumatologie St-Louis
City
Sainte Foy
State/Province
Quebec
ZIP/Postal Code
G1W 4R4
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Saskatoon Osteoporosis Centre
City
Saskatoon
State/Province
Saskatchewan
ZIP/Postal Code
S7K 0H6
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Affidea Praha s.r.o
City
Praha 11
ZIP/Postal Code
148 00
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
Revmatologicky ustav
City
Praha 2
ZIP/Postal Code
128 50
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
Revmatologicka Ambulance
City
Praha 4
ZIP/Postal Code
140 00
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
PV - MEDICAL, s.r.o.
City
Zlin
ZIP/Postal Code
760 01
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
East Tallinn Central Hospital
City
Tallinn
ZIP/Postal Code
EE-11412
Country
Estonia
Facility Name
North Estonia Regional Hospital
City
Tallinn
ZIP/Postal Code
EE-13419
Country
Estonia
Facility Name
Clinical Research Centre Ltd
City
Tartu
ZIP/Postal Code
50106
Country
Estonia
Facility Name
Hotel Dieu
City
Nantes Cedex 01
ZIP/Postal Code
44093
Country
France
Facility Name
Groupe Hospitalier Archet I et II
City
Nice
ZIP/Postal Code
6002
Country
France
Facility Name
Hopital Lariboisiere
City
Paris Cedex 10
ZIP/Postal Code
75475
Country
France
Facility Name
Fondation Hôpital Saint-Joseph
City
Paris
ZIP/Postal Code
75014
Country
France
Facility Name
Qualiclinic kft
City
Budapest
ZIP/Postal Code
1036
Country
Hungary
Facility Name
Synexus Magyarország Kft.
City
Budapest
ZIP/Postal Code
1036
Country
Hungary
Facility Name
Honvéd Kórház - Állami Egészségügyi Központ
City
Budapest
ZIP/Postal Code
1062
Country
Hungary
Facility Name
Debreceni Egyetem Orvos- es Egeszsegtudomanyi Centrum
City
Debrecen
ZIP/Postal Code
4032
Country
Hungary
Facility Name
Pest Megyei Flor Ferenc Korhaz
City
Kistarcsa
ZIP/Postal Code
2143
Country
Hungary
Facility Name
Principal SMO Kft.
City
Mako
ZIP/Postal Code
6900
Country
Hungary
Facility Name
MAV Korhaz es Rendelointezet Szolnok
City
Szolnok
ZIP/Postal Code
5000
Country
Hungary
Facility Name
Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria San Martino
City
Genova
ZIP/Postal Code
16132
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Ospedale Luigi Sacco
City
Milano
ZIP/Postal Code
20157
Country
Italy
Facility Name
AOU della II Universita degli Studi di Napoli
City
Napoli
ZIP/Postal Code
80130
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Fondazione PTV Policlinico Tor Vergata
City
Roma
ZIP/Postal Code
00133
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Ospedale Civile Maggiore Borgo Trento
City
Verona
ZIP/Postal Code
37126
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Chungnam National University Hospital
City
DaeJeon
ZIP/Postal Code
301-721
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
Inha University Hosiptal
City
Incheon
ZIP/Postal Code
400-711
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
Gachon University Gil Medical Center
City
Incheon
ZIP/Postal Code
405-760
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
Siauliai Hospital
City
Siauliai
ZIP/Postal Code
LT-76231
Country
Lithuania
Facility Name
Waikato hospital
City
Hamilton
ZIP/Postal Code
3204
Country
New Zealand
Facility Name
North Shore Hospital
City
Takapuna
ZIP/Postal Code
1309
Country
New Zealand
Facility Name
Timaru Hospital
City
Timaru
ZIP/Postal Code
8601
Country
New Zealand
Facility Name
Bytomskie Centrum Medyczne Silesiana Sp. z o.o.
City
Bialystok
ZIP/Postal Code
15-099
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Szpital Uniwersytecki nr 2 im. Dr Jana Biziela w Bydgoszczy
City
Bydgoszcz
ZIP/Postal Code
85-168
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Centrum Medyczne Silesiana Sp. z o.o.
City
Bytom
ZIP/Postal Code
41-902
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Synexus SCM Sp. z o.o.
City
Gdynia
ZIP/Postal Code
81-384
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Synexus SCM Sp. z o.o.
City
Katowice
ZIP/Postal Code
Poland
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Niepubliczny Zaklad Opieki Zdrowotnej REUMED
City
Lublin
ZIP/Postal Code
20-582
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Prywatna Praktyka Lekarska
City
Poznan
ZIP/Postal Code
61-397
Country
Poland
Facility Name
REUMATIKA-Centrum Reumatologii Niepubliczny Zaklad Opieki Zdrowotnej
City
Warszawa
ZIP/Postal Code
00-235
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Synexus SCM Sp. z o.o. Oddz. Warszawa
City
Warszawa
ZIP/Postal Code
01-192
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Synexus SCM Sp. z o.o.
City
Wroclaw
ZIP/Postal Code
50-088
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Sf. Maria Clinical Hospital
City
Bucharest
ZIP/Postal Code
011172
Country
Romania
Facility Name
Emergency County Clinical Hospital
City
Cluj-Napoca
ZIP/Postal Code
400006
Country
Romania
Facility Name
Sf Apostol Andrei Emergency Clinical County Hospital
City
Galati
ZIP/Postal Code
800578
Country
Romania
Facility Name
C.M.I. Dr. Ciornohuz Adriana
City
Iasi
ZIP/Postal Code
700127
Country
Romania
Facility Name
Veterans of Wars Regional Clinical Hospital
City
Kemerovo
ZIP/Postal Code
650000
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Kemerovo State Medical Academy of Roszdrav
City
Kemerovo
ZIP/Postal Code
650066
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Research Medical Complex Vashe Zdorovie
City
Kezch
ZIP/Postal Code
214025
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Krasnoyarsk State Medical Academy
City
Krasnoyarsk
ZIP/Postal Code
660022
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
City Clinical Hospital #5
City
Nizhniy Novgorod
ZIP/Postal Code
603005
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Research Institute of Clinical Immunology
City
Novosibirsk
ZIP/Postal Code
630099
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Research Institute of Clinical and Experimental Lymphology
City
Novosibirsk
ZIP/Postal Code
630117
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Penza Regional Clinical Hospital n.a. N.N. Burdenko
City
Penza
ZIP/Postal Code
440026
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Departmental Hospital at Smolensk Station RZhD JSC
City
Smolensk
ZIP/Postal Code
214025
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Tomsk Regional Clinical Hospital
City
Tomsk
ZIP/Postal Code
634063
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Regional Clinical Hospital
City
Vladimir
ZIP/Postal Code
600023
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Voronezh Regional Clinical Hopsital #1, Voronezh State Medical Academy
City
Voronezh
ZIP/Postal Code
394066
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Taipei Veterans General Hospital
City
Taipei
ZIP/Postal Code
11217
Country
Taiwan
Facility Name
National Taiwan University Hospital
City
Tapei
ZIP/Postal Code
10002
Country
Taiwan
Facility Name
Barnsley Hospital
City
Barnsley South Yorkshire
ZIP/Postal Code
S75 2EP
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Haywood Hospital
City
Burslem
ZIP/Postal Code
ST6 7AG
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Cannock Chase Hospital
City
Cannock
ZIP/Postal Code
WS11 5XY
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Poole Hospital
City
Poole
ZIP/Postal Code
BH1 5JB
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Southampton General Hospital
City
Southampton
ZIP/Postal Code
SO16 6YD
Country
United Kingdom

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Yes
IPD Sharing Plan Description
De-identified individual patient data for variables necessary to address the specific research question in an approved data sharing request
IPD Sharing Time Frame
Data sharing requests relating to this study will be considered beginning 18 months after the study has ended and either 1) the product and indication have been granted marketing authorization in both the US and Europe or 2) clinical development for the product and/or indication discontinues and the data will not be submitted to regulatory authorities. There is no end date for eligibility to submit a data sharing request for this study.
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
Qualified researchers may submit a request containing the research objectives, the Amgen product(s) and Amgen study/studies in scope, endpoints/outcomes of interest, statistical analysis plan, data requirements, publication plan, and qualifications of the researcher(s). In general, Amgen does not grant external requests for individual patient data for the purpose of re-evaluating safety and efficacy issues already addressed in the product labelling. Requests are reviewed by a committee of internal advisors. If not approved, a Data Sharing Independent Review Panel will arbitrate and make the final decision. Upon approval, information necessary to address the research question will be provided under the terms of a data sharing agreement. This may include anonymized individual patient data and/or available supporting documents, containing fragments of analysis code where provided in analysis specifications. Further details are available at the URL below.
IPD Sharing URL
http://www.amgen.com/datasharing
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
35428720
Citation
Mease PJ, Kavanaugh A, Ogdie A, Wells AF, Bergman M, Gladman DD, Richter S, Teng L, Jardon S, Smolen JS. Baseline Disease Activity Predicts Achievement of cDAPSA Treatment Targets With Apremilast: Phase III Results in DMARD-naive Patients With Psoriatic Arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2022 Jul;49(7):694-699. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.210906. Epub 2022 Apr 15.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
34100922
Citation
Wells AF, Edwards CJ, Kivitz AJ, Bird P, Guerette B, Delev N, Paris M, Teng L, Aelion JA. Apremilast monotherapy for long-term treatment of active psoriatic arthritis in DMARD-naive patients. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2022 Mar 2;61(3):1035-1043. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keab449.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
29635379
Citation
Wells AF, Edwards CJ, Kivitz AJ, Bird P, Nguyen D, Paris M, Teng L, Aelion JA. Apremilast monotherapy in DMARD-naive psoriatic arthritis patients: results of the randomized, placebo-controlled PALACE 4 trial. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2018 Jul 1;57(7):1253-1263. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/key032.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Efficacy and Safety Study of Apremilast to Treat Active Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA)

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs