search
Back to results

CyberKnife® for Hepatic Metastases From Colorectal Cancer

Primary Purpose

Colorectal Liver Metastases

Status
Terminated
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
CyberKnife SBRT
Sponsored by
Accuray Incorporated
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Colorectal Liver Metastases focused on measuring Hepatic metastases, Liver metastases, Colorectal cancer, Colorectal adenocarcinoma, Accuray, CyberKnife

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male or Female
  • Hepatic metastases from histologically confirmed colorectal adenocarcinoma
  • 3 hepatic lesions or less present
  • Cumulative size of hepatic lesions between 1 and 10 cm
  • Treatment determined by the liver/GI tumor board or equivalent organization at the participating site
  • Metastatic disease not amenable to surgery as assessed by the panel (including a surgeon) or patient who refuses surgery
  • Patient must be able to undergo contrast enhanced CT for planning
  • Age >= 18 years old
  • Performance Status (ECOG) ≤ 2
  • Minimum of 6 months between the initial diagnosis of the disease and the first hepatic metastasis
  • Minimum of 4 weeks between prior chemotherapy or targeted therapy and the first CyberKnife session
  • Total bilirubin ≤ 3 times the upper limit of normal, ASAT and ALAT ≤ 5 times the upper limit of normal
  • Albumin >= 36 g/L and lymphocytes >= 700/mm3
  • No contraindication to fiducials implantation, hemostasis problems shall be corrected before implantation
  • Life expectancy >= 3 months
  • Patient affiliated with a health insurance system. Applicable for French patients only.
  • Patient having signed the informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prior abdominal radiation therapy
  • Any evidence of visible intra-hepatic bile duct dilatation on pre-treatment images
  • Extrahepatic metastases
  • Current evidence of ascitis
  • Renal insufficiency (creatinine clearance < 45 ml/min)
  • Known allergy to gold
  • Pregnant or lactating woman
  • Prior history of other cancer except basocellular carcinoma and in situ cervix carcinoma
  • Patient already enrolled in another therapeutic clinical trial
  • Inability to comply with follow-up visits for geographical, social or psychological reasons

Sites / Locations

  • Centre Oscar Lambret
  • Alexis Vautrin Cancer Center
  • Centre Antoine Lacassagne
  • Hopital Bretonneau
  • CyberKnife Zentrum Mecklenburg-Vorpommern
  • Harley Street Clinic

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm Type

Experimental

Arm Label

CyberKnife SBRT

Arm Description

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Local recurrence-free survival
Local hepatic control (non progression: complete response, partial response or stable disease) will be assessed according to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1. Local recurrence-free survival time is calculated as the time between the date of first treatment session and the date of the first local recurrence. Patients alive who never experienced local recurrence at the time of analysis are censored at the date of the last follow-up visit. Patients who die from causes other than local recurrence at the time of analysis are censored at the date of death.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Recurrence-free survival
Recurrence-free survival time is calculated as the time between the date of first treatment session and the date of a local or distant recurrence or death from progression whichever comes first. Patients alive who never experienced recurrence at the time of analysis are censored at the date of the last follow-up visit. Patients who die from causes other than cancer are censored at the date of death.
Overall survival
Overall survival time is calculated as the time between the date of first treatment session and the date of death, whatever the cause. Patients alive at the time of analysis are censored at the date of the last follow-up visit.
Acute and long term toxicity
The National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0 will be used for toxicity assessment.
Quality of Life
European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (QLQ-C30) measures the quality of life for patients with cancer (for all participating sites). Quality of Life Questionnaire-Liver Metastases Colorectal (QLQ-LMC21) is a specific module developed by the EORTC for patients with colorectal liver metastases (for sites in the United Kingdom, The Netherlands, Germany, France, and Belgium (French speaking part)).
Correlation of response as assessed by Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 and Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Response Criteria in Solid Tumors (PERCIST)
The PERCIST response criteria will be applied to patients who have tumor characteristics measured by a PET-Scan. The association of response according to RECIST 1.1 and PERCIST will be evaluated with Spearman's correlation coefficient and the kappa statistic.
Local recurrence-free survival
Local hepatic control (non progression: complete response, partial response or stable disease) will be assessed according to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1. Local recurrence-free survival time is calculated as the time between the date of first treatment session and the date of the first local recurrence. Patients alive who never experienced local recurrence at the time of analysis are censored at the date of the last follow-up visit. Patients who die from causes other than local recurrence at the time of analysis are censored at the date of death.

Full Information

First Posted
March 16, 2011
Last Updated
April 5, 2013
Sponsor
Accuray Incorporated
Collaborators
Centre Oscar Lambret
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01318447
Brief Title
CyberKnife® for Hepatic Metastases From Colorectal Cancer
Official Title
International, Phase II Study of CyberKnife® for Hepatic Metastases From Colorectal Cancer
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
April 2013
Overall Recruitment Status
Terminated
Why Stopped
Lack of enrollment
Study Start Date
January 2011 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
March 2013 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
March 2013 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Accuray Incorporated
Collaborators
Centre Oscar Lambret

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This prospective, multicenter study is intended to establish the efficacy and toxicity of treating unresectable colorectal liver metastases with accurately administered radiation using the CyberKnife stereotactic radiosurgery system.
Detailed Description
Colorectal cancer is the fourth most commonly diagnosed malignant disease worldwide, with an estimated 1,023,000 new cases and 529,000 deaths each year. The liver is the most frequent site of metastatic spread from colorectal cancer, 25% of colorectal cancer patients will have liver metastases at the time of initial colorectal resection and more than 50% of colorectal cancer patients will develop liver metastases during the course of the disease. The current standard of care and only potential curative therapy for colorectal liver metastases is liver resection of the metastatic lesions. Surgical resection provides long term survival in patients with colorectal carcinoma (CRC) liver metastases. In a report of 1001 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer from Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center in NY, USA, surgical resection of liver metastases resulted in 3- and 5-year survival rates of 37% and 22%, respectively. Advances in pre- and intra-operative imaging and chemotherapy during recent years have increased overall survival up to 60% at 5 years after liver resection. However, 80-90% of liver metastases are unresectable at the time of diagnosis usually due to tumor location, multifocality, inadequate functional hepatic reserve or the patient's overall condition. For those patients, harboring unresectable liver metastases, alternative treatment approaches include neoadjuvant chemotherapy, local ablation therapy and stereotactic radiation therapy. The recent availability of neoadjuvant chemotherapeutic agents has increased the response rates and doubled the median overall survival time for metastatic colorectal cancer from 10 to 20 months. Recent studies have demonstrated that neoadjuvant therapy allows 12.5% of patients with unresectable CRC liver metastases to be significantly downstaged and eligible for hepatic resection. For unresectable CRC liver metastases, local ablative therapies are widely applied. Local ablative treatment refers to a variety of intervention techniques that specifically target tumors to directly destroy them. Numerous methods of ablation have been developed including cryoablation, percutaneous ethanol injection, radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and stereotactic radiation therapy. The most widely employed non-radiation based local ablative treatment is RFA which induces thermal ablation by passing high-frequency alternating current through the tumor utilizing electrodes that are placed within the tumor and surrounding tissue. RFA can be applied percutaneously under ultrasonic guidance or directly during laparoscopy or open laparotomy. Local recurrence rates of 44.4% at 18 months were reported by Solbiati et al. for CRC liver metastases with a median diameter of 2.6 cm. For tumors greater than 4 cm the local recurrence rate was 68%. RFA has an overall 3-year survival rate of 28-46% and a 5-year survival rate of 25%. However, patients with advanced hepatic decompensation, large tumors (3 to 5 cm), or multifocal tumors are generally considered poor candidates for RFA. Conventional radiation therapy has been shown useful for palliation of hepatic capsular pain, but historically it has played a minor role in the treatment of patients with unresectable liver metastases. This can be attributed chiefly to the low tolerance of the whole liver to radiation. The liver was thought to be a relatively radiosensitive organ and with whole liver irradiation, it was difficult to achieve the radiation doses necessary to eradicate gross tumors without causing radiation induced liver disease. Partial liver irradiation has shown some promise. Limiting irradiation to only one-third of the liver through three-dimensional (3D) conformal radiotherapy techniques, including intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), several studies have shown that partial liver irradiation is safe with doses up to 50-72.6 Gy. However, further dose escalation with conventional radiation therapy techniques risks injury to adjacent abdominal organs. Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) has emerged as a novel approach for the local ablation of liver metastases. SBRT provides a conformal isodose distribution with a steep radiation dose gradient allowing much higher doses of radiation than conventional radiation therapy and conformal radiotherapy techniques to be delivered safely with high precision to focal liver metastases while minimizing the radiation dose to normal liver and adjacent organs. To achieve this, precise localization of the target during treatment is required which necessitates accounting for tumor motion. SBRT technology utilizes a number of techniques to accommodate for tumor and respiratory motion including motion-restrictive techniques such as frames and abdominal compression, as well as motion-compensating techniques such as active breathing control and tumor tracking. The motion-restrictive techniques can be difficult for some patients to withstand, limiting those patients from being able to receive treatment. The motion-restrictive techniques can also necessitate the use of wide margins. Rusthoven et al. found a gross tumor volume (GTV) to planning target volume (PTV) expansion of up to 15 mm necessary in the craniocaudal direction. Wide margins can result in irradiation of a substantial volume of normal liver, potentially increasing the risk of radiation-induced injury. Some studies suggest the motion-compensating approach of active breathing control can aid in reducing the margins required by motion-restrictive approaches, however, Korreman et al. suggest those reductions may only be applicable with the use of image-guidance between and within sessions. The CyberKnife robotic radiosurgery system (Accuray Incorporated, Sunnyvale, CA) an advanced platform to deliver SBRT, provides a therapeutic solution to this problem by continuously tracking the tumor during treatment while it accounts for organ motion due to respiratory movement, using the Synchrony respiratory tracking system (Accuray Incorporated, Sunnyvale, CA). Utilizing continuous tumor tracking, margin expansion to account for motion uncertainty can be reduced, having the potential to make this a safe and effective treatment. The frameless nature of the CyberKnife and its continuous image guidance system eliminates the need of motion-restriction techniques increasing the comfort and availability of the treatment to patients.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Colorectal Liver Metastases
Keywords
Hepatic metastases, Liver metastases, Colorectal cancer, Colorectal adenocarcinoma, Accuray, CyberKnife

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
15 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
CyberKnife SBRT
Arm Type
Experimental
Intervention Type
Radiation
Intervention Name(s)
CyberKnife SBRT
Intervention Description
Dose is 45 Gy (15 Gy in 3 fractions) and delivered over 5 to 10 days.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Local recurrence-free survival
Description
Local hepatic control (non progression: complete response, partial response or stable disease) will be assessed according to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1. Local recurrence-free survival time is calculated as the time between the date of first treatment session and the date of the first local recurrence. Patients alive who never experienced local recurrence at the time of analysis are censored at the date of the last follow-up visit. Patients who die from causes other than local recurrence at the time of analysis are censored at the date of death.
Time Frame
12 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Recurrence-free survival
Description
Recurrence-free survival time is calculated as the time between the date of first treatment session and the date of a local or distant recurrence or death from progression whichever comes first. Patients alive who never experienced recurrence at the time of analysis are censored at the date of the last follow-up visit. Patients who die from causes other than cancer are censored at the date of death.
Time Frame
3, 6, 9, 12, 18 and 24 months
Title
Overall survival
Description
Overall survival time is calculated as the time between the date of first treatment session and the date of death, whatever the cause. Patients alive at the time of analysis are censored at the date of the last follow-up visit.
Time Frame
3, 6, 9, 12, 18 and 24 months
Title
Acute and long term toxicity
Description
The National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0 will be used for toxicity assessment.
Time Frame
3, 6, 9, 12, 18 and 24 months
Title
Quality of Life
Description
European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (QLQ-C30) measures the quality of life for patients with cancer (for all participating sites). Quality of Life Questionnaire-Liver Metastases Colorectal (QLQ-LMC21) is a specific module developed by the EORTC for patients with colorectal liver metastases (for sites in the United Kingdom, The Netherlands, Germany, France, and Belgium (French speaking part)).
Time Frame
3, 6, 9, 12, 18 and 24 months
Title
Correlation of response as assessed by Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 and Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Response Criteria in Solid Tumors (PERCIST)
Description
The PERCIST response criteria will be applied to patients who have tumor characteristics measured by a PET-Scan. The association of response according to RECIST 1.1 and PERCIST will be evaluated with Spearman's correlation coefficient and the kappa statistic.
Time Frame
6, 18 and 24 months
Title
Local recurrence-free survival
Description
Local hepatic control (non progression: complete response, partial response or stable disease) will be assessed according to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1. Local recurrence-free survival time is calculated as the time between the date of first treatment session and the date of the first local recurrence. Patients alive who never experienced local recurrence at the time of analysis are censored at the date of the last follow-up visit. Patients who die from causes other than local recurrence at the time of analysis are censored at the date of death.
Time Frame
3, 6, 9, 18 and 24 months

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Male or Female Hepatic metastases from histologically confirmed colorectal adenocarcinoma 3 hepatic lesions or less present Cumulative size of hepatic lesions between 1 and 10 cm Treatment determined by the liver/GI tumor board or equivalent organization at the participating site Metastatic disease not amenable to surgery as assessed by the panel (including a surgeon) or patient who refuses surgery Patient must be able to undergo contrast enhanced CT for planning Age >= 18 years old Performance Status (ECOG) ≤ 2 Minimum of 6 months between the initial diagnosis of the disease and the first hepatic metastasis Minimum of 4 weeks between prior chemotherapy or targeted therapy and the first CyberKnife session Total bilirubin ≤ 3 times the upper limit of normal, ASAT and ALAT ≤ 5 times the upper limit of normal Albumin >= 36 g/L and lymphocytes >= 700/mm3 No contraindication to fiducials implantation, hemostasis problems shall be corrected before implantation Life expectancy >= 3 months Patient affiliated with a health insurance system. Applicable for French patients only. Patient having signed the informed consent Exclusion Criteria: Prior abdominal radiation therapy Any evidence of visible intra-hepatic bile duct dilatation on pre-treatment images Extrahepatic metastases Current evidence of ascitis Renal insufficiency (creatinine clearance < 45 ml/min) Known allergy to gold Pregnant or lactating woman Prior history of other cancer except basocellular carcinoma and in situ cervix carcinoma Patient already enrolled in another therapeutic clinical trial Inability to comply with follow-up visits for geographical, social or psychological reasons
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Xavier Mirabel, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Centre Oscar Lambret
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Centre Oscar Lambret
City
Lille
ZIP/Postal Code
59020
Country
France
Facility Name
Alexis Vautrin Cancer Center
City
Nancy
Country
France
Facility Name
Centre Antoine Lacassagne
City
Nice
Country
France
Facility Name
Hopital Bretonneau
City
Tours
Country
France
Facility Name
CyberKnife Zentrum Mecklenburg-Vorpommern
City
Gustrow
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Harley Street Clinic
City
London
Country
United Kingdom

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

CyberKnife® for Hepatic Metastases From Colorectal Cancer

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs